NVFC urges Congress to resolve shutdown affecting fire grants and training

“The nation’s fire service should not be collateral damage to this fight,” says NVFC

The National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC) has called on its members to write to Congress to resolve the Department of Homeland Security funding lapse, stating that the shutdown is delaying fire service grants and disrupting federal training.

NVFC said the shutdown, which began on 14 February, has delayed the application period for the Assistance for Firefighters Grants and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grants and has closed the U.S. Fire Administration and the National Fire Academy.

The funding dispute centres on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, where Congress passed a broader spending measure on 3 February that kept most federal agencies open through 30 September.

Department of Homeland Security funding was extended only through 13 February.

The Senate did not advance a longer-term Department of Homeland Security bill on 12 February.

The department entered a partial shutdown on 14 February.

The fire service is affected because the Federal Emergency Management Agency is part of the Department of Homeland Security.

The U.S. Fire Administration sits within FEMA.

This structure means a funding lapse can interrupt grant administration and training activity relied on by local departments.

NVFC warning follows grant delays and academy closure

The Assistance to Firefighters Grants and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response programmes are authorised, although they still depend on annual appropriations and federal administration.

The International Association of Fire Chiefs stated on 6 February that funding for the U.S. Fire Administration, the National Fire Academy and the AFG and SAFER programmes had only been extended through 13 February.

In its 18 February Washington update, the IAFC said the shutdown affected FEMA and USFA and expected delays to the application periods for AFG, FP&S and SAFER.

The IAFC’s March 2026 Legislative Hot Sheet says Congress has not passed the final FY 2026 Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill.

The document states that this will delay the application periods for AFG and SAFER.

It also says Congress authorised up to $750 million each for the FIRE and SAFER grant programmes through FY 2028 under the Fire Grants and Safety Act.

House and Senate negotiators agreed on FY 2026 funding of $342 million each.

FEMA fire grant pages currently carry lapse-in-funding notices.

These notices indicate that normal grant administration is being disrupted.

On training, the IAFC’s March hot sheet says the National Fire Academy is closed because of the lapse in Department of Homeland Security funding.

Public-facing course pages show cancellations for February 2026 offerings.

National Fire Academy procedures state that campus operations halt during a government shutdown.

Current classes are dismissed.

Scheduled students are told to cancel travel plans until operations resume.

Public evidence also indicates disruption to the U.S. Fire Administration.

USFA and FEMA webpages remain online and carry notices stating that some site updates and transactions may not be processed during the funding lapse.

Congress would need to enact either a full FY 2026 Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill or another stopgap measure to restore normal operations.

NVFC campaign message to members of Congress

NVFC has also shared a pre written message that supporters can send to U.S. senators and representatives calling for the shutdown to be resolved.

The council said the message is intended to be sent by constituents, including volunteer firefighters, to outline the effects the funding lapse is having on federal fire service programmes.

The NVFC message reads: “As a volunteer firefighter and your constituent, I am writing to inform you of the significant damage the current lapse in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding has had on the nation’s fire service.

“While I understand the controversy surrounding the funding of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) an agreement must be reached as soon as possible or a carve-out for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding must be made.

“The nation’s fire service should not be collateral damage to this fight.

“FEMA houses many programs and grants that are crucial to the success of the nation’s fire service including the National Fire Academy (NFA), Assistance for Firefighter Grants (AFG), and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants (SAFER).

“The NFA offers the fire service unique specialized and executive training like the U.S. Army and Navy War Colleges provide for our armed services.

“Each year the NFA provides training for approximately 100,000 fire and emergency service personnel.

“Between the NFA’s shutdown from March to June 2025, the Government Shutdown in late 2025, and this latest lapse in funding, the NFA has been closed nearly 5 of the last 12 months.

“This is unacceptable.

“AFG and SAFER are the most important grant programs serving the nation’s fire service.

“They provide funding for critical equipment and recruitment programs that many local tax bases across the country cannot support, this is especially true of rural communities that are mostly served by volunteer departments.

“This lapse in DHS funding has already delayed the rollout of the application period for these grants and will likely delay their required peer review process.

“If swift action is not taken to restore funding, FEMA is going to be hard pressed to get awards for these grants allocated by the end of the fiscal year.

“Much like last year where, because of the undue time related pressure FEMA was under, there was much confusion about grant awards and less flexibility provided to grant recipients.

“Please act immediately to restore funding to DHS to ensure our nation’s security and preparedness, or at minimum fund FEMA so the nation’s fire service and emergency response capabilities are not compromised any further.

“Thank you for your consideration of this important matter.”

IAFF members in British Columbia gain presumptive coverage for eight cancers

Cancer coverage expands in British Columbia

British Columbia has added eight cancers to its presumptive regime for fire fighters, bringing the total to 26 covered cancers.

The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) said the regulatory change was announced on March 3 by B.C. Premier David Eby and Labour Minister Jennifer Whiteside.

Five respiratory cancers are now included: tracheal and bronchial cancers.

Laryngeal cancer, nasal cancer and pharyngeal cancer are also covered.

Skin cancer and soft tissue sarcoma have been added.

Mesothelioma has also been included, described in the source material as a cancer associated with asbestos exposure.

Changes to eligibility and claims process

The regulation reduces the required years of service to qualify for esophageal cancer coverage from 20 to 15.

The source material states that this change reflects a precedent set by the Ontario Professional Fire Fighters Association in 2023.

The announcement was made before delegates attending the British Columbia Professional Fire Fighters Association (BCPFFA) annual Robert E. Hall Legislative Conference in Victoria.

BCPFFA President Todd Schierling said: “The BCPFFA has been a tireless advocate for these changes, and this is the strongest set of protections in the country,

“It means our members won’t be left fighting the system at the same time they’re fighting cancer.”

Schierling added: “This comprehensive approach reinforces the provincial government’s unwavering commitment to those who protect the public, ensuring they return home healthy at the end of their service.”

IAFF reaction and background on presumptive laws

IAFF General President Edward Kelly said: “Cancer remains the leading cause of line-of-duty deaths in the fire service,

“Strong presumptive laws are an important part of confronting that reality across Canada.”

Eby stated: “Fire fighters so often face hazardous situations.

“We’re making sure they have support when they need it most.”

The source material states that occupational cancer claims the lives of more than 60 Canadian IAFF members each year, including 84 IAFF members in British Columbia over the past 10 years.

Presumptive cancer coverage streamlines the workers’ compensation process by reversing the burden of proof so fire fighters and their families can access support and compensation.

Presumptive legislation for fire fighters was first enacted in Manitoba in 2002 and is now in place in every province and territory in Canada.

British Columbia introduced its first presumptive legislation in 2005 with eight forms of cancer and has updated the regime several times.

Coverage also extends to heart injury and operational stress injury.

Sixth District Vice President Mike Carter said: “This advance will ensure that more fire fighters who get job-related cancers, and their families, get the support and compensation they deserve.”

ASFP working group outlines next steps for External Envelope guidance

External envelope work begins with TG14 first meeting

The first meeting of TG14 – ‘Passive Fire Protection and the External Envelope’ brought together specialists from multiple disciplines, according to a blog post by Paul McSoley shared by the Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP).

Participants included designers and engineers, facade experts, penetration seals, cavity barrier and fixing specialists, plus testing, certification and installation representatives.

The day opened with a call from Mike Ward, who said the next logical step towards industry-wide competence in passive fire protection sits within the void between the faced and the building structure.

Discussion centred on definitions, typologies and testing interfaces

Following work on the ASFP Green Book – fire doors and the ASFP Clear Book – fire resistant glazing, Hannah Mansell told the group that facades are a natural area to simplify and that a similar approach should be applied to external systems as the Design Guide for internal passive fire protection nears completion.

The discussion was framed around how a facade should be defined and what passive fire protection means in that context.

Mansell said: “While I recognise I am not a facade expert, part of my objective for the first session was to break down facades into typologies.

“For example, is the facade external to the building structure, or is it recessed within it?

“If so, what are the next natural steps in identifying the principles of each one?

“To go even further, how many common approaches of facade are there in each location, and how do we determine the approaches for how passive fire protection is applied from a cavity barrier, a door, a window or even a flue discharge?

“What about the wall junctions from the internal compartments that separate room space, and what type of building safety risks could they contain?”

McSoley wrote that the ASFP Purple Book – fire-resisting partitions approach to internal substrates may provide comparators for the work on external substrates.

He wrote that passive fire protection systems are either applied as a weight to the wall substrate or supported from the slab, with installation usually specific to partition-type systems or rigid structures.

He added that the difference with external walls is that they become a non-standard supporting construction, and that testing and determining interfaces will be a key part of TG14’s work.

Next meeting to compile feedback and map facade types

McSoley wrote that the group’s next steps will involve breaking system types down and applying the colour book approach to external substrates.

He added that the next meeting should be better placed to compile feedback from the day and identify facade types and common interface principles that form a whole system.

Report questions claims about water mist outperformance in England fire incident data

Water mist systems in IRS data are not like-for-like

A report by Optimal Economics has concluded that Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) incident data cannot be used to determine the comparative effectiveness of sprinklers and water mist systems in England.

Commissioned by the British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA), the analysis drew on the MHCLG Incident Recording System (IRS) dataset of primary fires where a sprinkler or water-based fire suppression system was present between 2018/19 and 2023/24.

It reviewed 2,924 incidents in total.

Sprinkler systems accounted for 2,438 incidents, or 83% of the dataset.

Water mist systems accounted for 486 incidents.

Sprinkler systems are described as fixed, building-wide installations, whereas water mist covers a range of technologies including fixed automatic systems and portable or manually deployed hose-reel and lance equipment.

The dataset does not distinguish between those different water mist system types.

Where fires occurred and how systems were recorded

The analysis identified marked differences in the characteristics of incidents recorded under each system category.

Most sprinkler and water mist incidents occurred in non-residential buildings.

Industrial premises accounted for almost half of non-residential sprinkler incidents, including factories, recycling centres and warehouses.

There were 69 water mist incidents in industrial premises, mainly in food and drinks processing, recycling and factories.

In non-residential settings, 74% of water mist incidents were recorded in custodial environments, including prisons and young offenders’ institutions.

In dwellings, sprinkler incidents were concentrated in purpose-built flats or maisonettes, particularly those with more than ten storeys.

Water mist incidents in dwellings were primarily recorded in low-rise settings, with a concentration in single-occupancy bungalows or self-contained sheltered housing.

The report links these cases to the use of personal protection systems for vulnerable residents under local policies.

Differences were also recorded in the location of systems relative to the fire.

In most sprinkler incidents, the system was located in the room of origin.

In water mist incidents, the system was more often recorded as being on the same floor as the fire.

In 71% of water mist incidents where the system operated, the fire was on the same floor as the system rather than in the room of origin.

Conclusions and recommendations for future data

The report concludes that the IRS dataset does not contain two comparable populations of building-wide automatic suppression systems.

As a result, a robust comparative analysis of operational reliability and performance reliability between sprinklers and water mist is not possible.

It states: “Any claims that MHCLG incident data demonstrate superior effectiveness of water mist systems compared to sprinklers are not supported by the evidence and arise from invalid comparisons between fundamentally different types of fire suppression systems.”

The analysis calls for system-level classification, consistent standards and sufficient sample sizes to enable valid comparisons.

It recommends that future IRS data collection distinguishes fixed building-wide suppression, personal protection systems, local application protection and manually deployed custodial systems.

Without that separation, it warns that “suppression policy risks being shaped by invalid evidence”.

MAGB launches Technical Committee and cavity fire barrier construction guidance

Construction guidance on cavity fire barriers

The Masonry Association of Great Britain (MAGB) has launched a new Technical Committee and published its first Technical Note on cavity fire barrier installation.

MAGB announced the cross-sector group alongside Technical Note TN-01/26, which addresses cavity fire barriers and raises concerns about increasing use of zero-compression products.

MAGB said the Committee brings together senior technical specialists from across the masonry supply chain, including brick and component manufacturers, fire barrier and insulation suppliers, façade contractors, structural engineers, warranty providers and training bodies.

TN-01/26 marks the first step in a programme intended to raise awareness of long-term fire safety performance within masonry construction.

What TN-01/26 sets out on compression

In Technical Note TN-01/26, MAGB states that zero-compression cavity barriers may achieve compliance in laboratory fire testing, and that buildings change over time.

The guidance outlines structural frame shortening caused by creep and shrinkage, brickwork settlement, mortar movement, thermal expansion and construction tolerances as factors that can increase cavity dimensions.

Barriers installed without positive compression rely on exact geometry at the point of installation.

As movement occurs, gaps of only a few millimetres may allow flame and hot gases to bypass the barrier.

Because these interfaces are concealed once construction is complete, failures are not detectable through routine inspection.

The Note recommends installing horizontal and vertical cavity fire barriers with compression, with a nominal minimum preload of 5mm unless greater compression is justified by manufacturer testing.

Committee remit and next publications

Keith Aldis, chair of the Masonry Association Technical Committee, said: “This Committee has been formed to bring senior technical expertise from across the masonry sector into one forum with a clear purpose – to identify emerging risks and provide practical, evidence-based guidance to the industry.

“Our first Technical Note (TN-01/26) reflects our collective assessment of how buildings behave in reality over time.

“Laboratory fire testing is conducted under controlled conditions, but real structures are subject to settlement, shrinkage and differential movement.

“Positive compression in cavity fire barriers is fundamental to maintaining contact and continuity as that movement occurs.

“Our guidance is intended to support long-term fire integrity and promote durable, movement-tolerant solutions across the sector.

“This publication is the first in a series of Technical Notes intended to support long-term fire integrity and promote movement-tolerant, durable solutions across the sector.”

MAGB confirmed that further Technical Notes and guidance documents will follow as part of its ongoing technical programme.

IFE highlights fire sector career pathways during National Careers Week 2026

IFE activity during National Careers Week 2026

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) is taking part in National Careers Week from 2 to 7 March 2026.

The IFE said it is using the week to promote the range of roles available across the fire sector.

The campaign includes a series of interviews with members sharing career journeys, insights and guidance for people considering the profession.

The IFE has also produced job packs that set out career pathways across the fire sector, including fire response and compliance, design, systems, safety management and academia.

Resources and CEO comments

The IFE said the job packs are intended to provide practical information on the breadth of opportunities available in the profession.

Steve Hamm, IFE CEO, said: “Fire safety is far from a one-size-only career.

“We need to encourage future generations to pursue their goals and careers that they desire.

“The IFE supports and nurtures all future talent.

“Fire safety careers play a vital part in building safety and the creation of safe, sustainable places for people to work, live and go about their lives.”

The IFE said it provides learning, recognition and networking opportunities through its Elevate webinars and annual Graduate Lecture.

The organisation said it will share updates during the week on LinkedIn.

Fire Protection Association releases 2025/26 review covering guidance, CPD and influence

Fire Protection Association membership review published for 2025/26

The Fire Protection Association (FPA) has published its 2025/26 Membership Review, outlining updates to member benefits, access to fire safety guidance and professional development.

According to the FPA, the review reflects changes introduced during 2025 to its membership scheme and the range of technical resources available to members.

Membership provides access to fire safety advice, guidance and resources, including continuing professional development (CPD) and education opportunities aimed at supporting competence across the sector.

Guidance expansion, member influence and CPD activity

In 2025, the FPA refreshed its membership structure following member feedback and introduced three category types intended to give organisations of different sizes access to appropriate levels of technical advice and guidance.

The updated scheme also introduced additional benefits linked to collaboration, influence and ongoing CPD.

During 2025, members received priority access to new and updated publications including Sprinkler System Service and Maintenance: Guidance, Records and Checklists and The Joint Code of Practice on the Protection from Fire of Construction Sites and Buildings Undergoing Renovation – Tenth Edition Incorporating Amendments 1 and 2.

Further documents included RC70: Recommendations for Risk Control for Switchgear and Transformers, RC69: Risk Control Recommendations for Onshore Wind Turbines and Business Continuity for Small and Medium Businesses.

Membership also provides opportunities to contribute to FPA guidance, research carried out for insurers, government, regulators and industry, and responses to consultations.

During 2025, members were able to share views on the Building Safety Regulator to inform the House of Lords inquiry into building regulations, suggest topics for the FIRE Conference 2025 programme, provide feedback on new and updated documents and propose areas for future guidance and research.

The CPD programme included approved webinars covering legislative updates, passive fire protection, insurance risk and research developments.

Members also gained access to introductory e-courses addressing hot works, the role of a fire warden, the basics of fire door inspections and personal emergency evacuation plans (PEEPS).

As part of the refreshed scheme, the FPA introduced a Membership Code of Professional Conduct requiring new and renewing members to commit to standards of integrity, professional behaviour and professional competency.

The review makes clear that membership does not accredit or endorse member products or services.

Events, journal coverage and 2026 programme

The Fire & Risk Management (F&RM) journal covered topics in 2025 including the fire safety journey of a building, active protection, building fire safety and law and enforcement.

Additional themes included products and procurement, facilities and fire, organisational culture and approaches to safety and transport-related fire risks.

The FIRE Conference 2025, held at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, centred on future-proofing the built environment and featured sessions on leadership, wildfire detection, regulatory evolution and emerging risks.

Looking ahead, the 2026 programme includes a webinar schedule and research projects delivered through the RISCAuthority research scheme, covering active fire protection, timber construction, moisture management, hybrid buildings, SMART towers and emerging risks.

James Stone, FPA Membership and Marketing Manager, said: “Given the significant changes to the fire safety landscape, it is more important now than ever that we support members ensure we are meeting their needs.

“Their feedback shaped our refreshed membership categories, influenced new guidance, and steered our research priorities.

“The expanded access to technical resources showcased in this review is a direct result of our ongoing dialogue with our members.”

Dr Gavin Dunn, FPA Chief Executive, said: “The Membership Review highlights the FPA’s unwavering focus on ensuring that every member, whether an individual practitioner or a larger organisation, has the guidance and tools required to support them with the challenges they face on a daily basis.

“The breadth of new material and opportunities made available in 2025 demonstrates our continued commitment to raising standards across the sector.”

New compliance resource targets client responsibilities in building safety regime

Compliance guide sets out client duties under building safety law

A coalition of construction industry organisations has published new guidance to help clients understand their legal responsibilities under the Building Safety Act and encourage compliance across all projects.

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) produced the Clients’ Guide to the Building Safety Act with support from eight organisations and backing from the Building Safety Regulator’s Industry Competence Committee (ICC).

The guide responds to concerns that some clients continue to prioritise cost and delivery speed while failing to meet their legislative duties under the Act, which has been in force since 2022.

It is supported by Constructing Excellence, the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), the Construction Clients’ Leadership Group (CCLG), Cast Consultancy, SFG20, the Industry Competence Steering Group, Ackroyd Lowrie and the Safety & Health Engineering Partnership (SHEP).

It explains that the building safety regime applies to all buildings and is not limited to higher-risk or high-rise residential developments.

The document defines the client role, outlines legal duties and describes how compliance must be maintained throughout a project.

It also explains the consequences of failing to meet legal requirements and includes information on processes specific to higher-risk buildings and further resources.

The guidance presents complex legislation in plain English to reduce misunderstanding and support informed procurement decisions.

Jon Vanstone, chair of the Industry Competence Committee (ICC), said: “The Building Safety Act places clear legal duties on clients.

“They set the tone for projects through their procurement decisions, appointments and allocation of resources.

“If those duties are taken seriously and supported by competent appointments and informed oversight, the quality and safety of outcomes will improve.

“If they are not, no amount of downstream control can fully compensate.

“Guidance that helps clients understand both their statutory responsibilities and the practical implications of those responsibilities is therefore welcome, particularly where it aligns with the Regulator’s Principles for Informed Clients and supports consistent cross-industry understanding.”

Guidance aims to support informed procurement and reduce project risks

BESA director of specialist knowledge Rachel Davidson said the guidance was designed to help clients make safer procurement decisions and maintain compliance with legal requirements.

“This is a practical guide designed to help clients navigate the building safety process,” Davidson said.

“It is intended to educate not intimidate by explaining what good looks like so clients can make better, safer procurement decisions that also make sense for their businesses”.

“By following the information in the guide, they can reduce project risks and avoid costly mistakes which lead to expensive delays and re-designs.”

Davidson added that the guide would also help contractors explain legislative requirements and give them confidence to challenge procurement decisions that could affect safety and quality.

“Contractors are duty bound under the legislation to refuse to start work unless they are satisfied that the client is fully aware of their responsibilities.”

Lilly Gallafent, CEO of the Real Estate consultancy Cast, said the guide reinforced the need for clients to take responsibility for long-term building safety outcomes.

“Change needs to start with clients,” Gallafent said.

“Whilst many already do, clients all need to recognise that they have the power to drive a new culture through their supply chains, but they need to be willing to allocate risk fairly and focus on how their decisions will affect the operational life of their buildings.

“Pushing hard for cost savings at the start of a project can, when not managed appropriately, end up being very expensive in the long run and risk needs to be properly assessed and not just pushed down the supply chain.

“This excellent guide reminds us that this is a once in a generation opportunity to bring about meaningful and lasting change to construction procurement for the benefit of the industry and all building users.”

The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) also welcomed the publication and said it would help clients understand their legal obligations under the Act.

Head of client development Linda Stevens said: “The Building Safety Act places responsibilities on both clients and their contractors, and we hear that for many clients it can be a struggle to get to grips with exactly what they are required by law to do.

“Our own Client Guide includes information on building safety amongst other important subjects, and we very much welcome this additional resource from BESA which can help clients in their understanding of what can be complex legislation.

“It can only be through everyone conforming to the Building Safety Act that we will ensure the built environment is safe for every community.”

The guide is available for free download and will be discussed at a building safety briefing event at the Palace of Westminster on May 5.

First Grenfell annual report details progress across construction and fire services

Grenfell annual report published in Parliament

The government has published its first annual report on progress implementing the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government published the report on 25 February 2026 and laid it in Parliament, followed by an oral statement by the Rt Hon Steve Reed OBE MP, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.

The document groups recommendations under four themes covering the construction industry, fire and rescue services, response and recovery, and vulnerable people including Phase 1 recommendations related to Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans.

A total of 58 Phase 2 recommendations were made to government and responsible organisations, all of which were accepted.

Twelve recommendations have now been implemented, completed and formally discharged, including two remaining Phase 1 recommendations.

Government projections indicate that 70% of recommendations will be closed by the end of 2026.

Quarterly progress reports are scheduled for publication in May, September and December 2026.

Translations of the annual report are also planned.

Report sets out implementation progress across safety, enforcement and remediation

The executive summary provides a breakdown of 28 recommendations linked to the construction industry, 13 related to fire and rescue services, 14 covering response and recovery and six addressing vulnerable people and remaining Phase 1 measures.

Across all themes, 49 recommendations remain in progress and 12 have been completed.

Building safety, fire safety and emergency response functions have now been brought under a single departmental lead.

On 27 January 2026, the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) became an independent legal entity, transferring from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to operate as an arm’s-length body under the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.

Consultation has also been launched on extending building control requirements to telecommunications works.

Alongside the annual report, a Construction Products Reform White Paper was published outlining regulatory changes, with further consultation underway on introducing a general safety requirement for currently unregulated products and plans to bring forward secondary legislation later in 2026.

A review of statutory building safety guidance is continuing, supported by an expert panel appointed in July 2025, with an interim report expected in spring 2026.

During 2025, more than 1,200 professionals across fire engineering, building control and construction completed updated competency training aligned with new frameworks.

The Fire Engineers Advisory Panel’s competency statement has been adopted by 35 higher education institutions.

The Building Control Independent Panel has reviewed over 220 evidence submissions to inform recommendations due later in 2026.

Regulatory activity has increased, with local regulators issuing 124% more formal notices and conducting 140% more inspections compared with the previous year.

More than 110 building assessments were supported by the Joint Inspection Team, resulting in 15 enforcement actions where risks remained unresolved.

The Remediation Enforcement Unit is scheduled to reach full staffing by the end of March 2026.

By December 2025, remediation work had started or been completed on 2,168 buildings, including 1,475 where remediation was fully complete.

Developers have confirmed remediation pathways for 93% of buildings covered by the Developer Contract, with work started or completed on 41% of buildings with confirmed defects.

More than 4,500 residents have accessed government funded training and rights information, and the expanded Resident Panel has contributed to over 20 policy decisions.

The Make Things Right campaign reached an estimated 1.8 million tenants, contributing to increased early-stage reporting of issues.

Emergency preparedness measures included updated National Resilience Standards training completed by more than 2,000 responders during 2025.

Five Local Resilience Forum Trailblazer areas are testing integrated resilience leadership models, with early findings expected in summer 2026.

Updated statutory guidance on supporting vulnerable residents was published in April 2025.

Memorial legislation and reform programme outlined

The annual report confirms that legislation will be introduced to enable the construction and maintenance of the Grenfell Tower Memorial.

Plans include the creation of both a public memorial space and a private memorial area for those most directly affected, as recommended by an independent panel.

In the ministerial foreword, Reed said: “The tragedy was preventable, and it should have been prevented.”

The report also sets out planned reforms to the construction products regulatory framework through the publication of a white paper and consultation on new safety requirements, with further legislation planned later in 2026.

Preventr fire protection group secures £10m expansion funding

Preventr secures funding and expands passive fire protection capabilities

Preventr has secured a £10m funding facility from Growth Lending to support expansion and acquisitions, including the purchase of Passive Fire Safety Solutions Limited (PFSS).

Preventr confirmed that an initial £6.2m has been provided to fund the PFSS acquisition and support its growth plans.

The wider facility provides additional capacity to pursue further acquisitions and invest in operational capacity, workforce and technology across the UK.

The PFSS acquisition expands installation and compliance capabilities and complements existing fire door manufacturing operations.

This positions the business to deliver full passive fire protection services nationwide across regulated environments including social housing, NHS facilities, commercial real estate, airports and residential portfolios.

Preventr employs 75 people nationwide and operates as a London-based national fire protection specialist and a portfolio company of Tandy Ventures.

Preventr outlines strategy supported by funding and acquisition

Preventr stated that the funding supports its buy-and-build strategy and internal transformation initiatives, including the roll-out of AI-powered technology to analyse building safety data and prioritise fire safety actions.

This technology is intended to help engineers manage compliance workloads more efficiently and improve building safety data analysis.

Jamil Anakkar, Founder and Chief Executive of Preventr, said: “The financial support provided by Growth Lending has enabled us to accelerate our pace of growth through acquisitions as well as internal transformation projects, helping us to position as a leader in the UK fire safety marketplace.

“The acquisition of PFSS is an important milestone for the group as it complements our existing fire door manufacturing capability.

“We now have the ability to offer full-scope passive protection services on a national basis, strengthening our proposition to clients who require trusted partners capable of delivering at scale.”

Adam Brinn, Managing Director at Growth Lending, said: “Preventr operates in a market supported by clear structural drivers and has built a strong reputation for providing high-quality, compliant fire safety solutions.

“This transaction supports a compelling buy-and-build strategy led by an experienced management team and enables the business to scale its capabilities while delivering positive social impact through improved fire safety standards.”

The transaction was introduced by Langdon Capital, with due diligence support from FRP, tax due diligence provided by Wilson Partners, lender counsel from Browne Jacobson and borrower legal advice from JMW Solicitors.