Vacancy: Peabody Seeks Assistant Fire Remediation Manager to Support Building Safety Compliance

Role: Assistant Fire Remediation Manager
Salary: £38,438 pa + benefits
Location; Ealing

Click here to apply

Peabody is looking for a proactive and detail-oriented Assistant Fire Remediation Manager to join its Fire Remediation Team. In this role, the successful candidate will help ensure Peabody’s buildings are compliant with the Building Safety Act 2022 and that residents feel safe and supported.

The Assistant Fire Remediation Manager will work closely with internal teams and external stakeholders to manage works arising from PAS9980 assessments, supporting the delivery of fire safety remediation across Peabody’s portfolio.

This is a unique opportunity to contribute to one of the UK’s largest housing associations and make a meaningful impact on building safety and customer experience.

About the role

As an Assistant Fire Remediation Manager, the postholder will support the Programme Information Manager in coordinating and reporting on fire remediation programmes. They will manage communications, respond to queries, and maintain accurate data across systems and databases. They will liaise with contractors, residents, and internal teams to arrange access, process invoices, and ensure works are delivered efficiently and sensitively. They will also contribute to section 20 consultations, investigate complaints, and represent the department at site meetings. This role will be key in ensuring compliance, improving service delivery, and maintaining trust with customers. The postholder will be required to attend the office two days a week.

What they’ll need
• Experience in housing or fire safety, with a good understanding of the regulatory environment and lease agreements.
• Strong organisational and administrative skills, with attention to detail and the ability to manage multiple tasks.
• Advanced Excel skills and experience with SharePoint; familiarity with Ipos invoice processing is desirable.
• Excellent communication and interpersonal skills, with the ability to work collaboratively and professionally with diverse stakeholders.
• Confidence using IT systems and a flexible, customer-focused approach to working in a fast-paced environment.

Why join Peabody?

When joining Peabody, individuals are joining a team guided by its values: Be Kind, Do the Right Thing, Love New Ideas, Celebrate Diversity, Keep Our Promises, and Pull Together. Peabody believes in creating a workplace where everyone feels supported, included, and empowered.

What Peabody offers

• 30 days’ annual holiday, plus bank holidays
• Two additional paid volunteering days each year
• Flexible benefits scheme, including family-friendly benefits and access to a discount portal
• 4 x salary life assurance
• Up to 10% pension contribution

Closing date: 17th November 2025 at midnight

Please note: As an employer, Peabody does not provide sponsorship as a licensed UK employer.

Click here to apply

Building safety from A to Z: From design to demolition

Yaser Mohammed, FLS Design Manager at Diriyah Company, explains how building safety runs through every phase of a building’s life, from design to demolition

When people think of fire safety in buildings, they often picture sprinklers, smoke alarms, or the red pull stations on the wall.

But true fire safety is much more than devices or hardware.

It is a story that begins the moment a building is imagined and continues until its very last day.

Just like people, buildings have life cycles, birth, growth, changes and eventually retirement.

At every stage, fire safety must remain a constant companion.

According to the NFPA Fire Loss in the United States report (2023), more than 1.5 million fires are reported annually, leading to nearly 3,800 civilian deaths and over $18 billion in property damage.

These sobering numbers remind us why fire safety must be treated not as a single milestone, but as a continuous journey.

From vision to blueprint

The seeds of fire safety are planted at the earliest stage of planning.

Architects, engineers and fire protection specialists must work together to make choices that shape the entire life of a building.

At this point, fundamental questions arise:

  • Who will use the building?
  • How many people will it hold?
  • What hazards might they bring with them?

A hospital, for example, requires defend-in-place strategies for immobile patients, while a shopping mall demands wider exit routes to accommodate tens of thousands of visitors each day.

Standards guide these decisions.

The Saudi Building Code (SBC 201) and NFPA 101 both stress the importance of classifying occupancy types and calculating occupant loads correctly.

The placement and width of exits, the need for fire barriers and the scope of suppression and detection systems are all influenced by these early design choices.

If designers opt for prescriptive compliance, they follow code requirements directly, while performance-based design allows them to use advanced tools such as computational fluid dynamics modeling to demonstrate safety.

As former US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said: “Plans are nothing; planning is everything.”

Building it right

Even the best design means little if it is not built correctly.

The construction phase is often where fire safety faces the biggest risks, not from fire itself, but from shortcuts.

Contractors under pressure to save costs may use materials that don’t meet the code or fail to properly seal fire barriers.

Poor coordination between trades can also create problems, such as sprinklers being blocked by light fixtures or ducts cutting through fire walls without protection

Commissioning serves as the safeguard against these risks.

This process is more than a checklist; it is the proof that fire safety systems function as intended.

Sprinklers are tested to ensure they activate at the correct temperature, alarms are measured to confirm they meet the required sound levels and smoke control systems are evaluated for their response time and integration with detection systems.

NFPA 4, which requires integrated system testing, emphasises that individual components may work, but unless they work together, lives remain at risk.

At the end of this stage, the authority having jurisdiction signs off only if the building demonstrates true readiness.

Living with fire safety

When a building opens and people move in, fire safety begins its longest stage.

The responsibility now belongs to the owners and facility managers and their main task is to stay alert.

Fire systems must be regularly checked, tested and maintained, following standards such as NFPA 25 for sprinklers, NFPA 72 for alarms and NFPA 80 for fire doors.

NFPA research shows that sprinklers worked in 92 percent of fires large enough to trigger them and they were effective 96 percent of the time.

Most failures, however, came from closed valves or poor maintenance, simple issues that could have been prevented, but instead can turn a small fire into a major tragedy

History has shown the consequences of neglect.

The Grenfell Tower fire in London in 2017 demonstrated how outdated systems and compromised fire barriers can magnify disaster.

Similarly, many nightclub fires, from Rhode Island to Brazil, were exacerbated by blocked exits and disabled alarms.

These lessons reinforce the importance of not only maintaining systems but also managing daily operations with discipline: keeping corridors clear, ensuring extinguishers remain accessible and training staff to respond calmly during emergencies.

Renovation brings an additional layer of complexity.

Buildings rarely remain static; an office may transform into a restaurant, or a warehouse into a theatre.

Each change reshapes the fire safety landscape.

Adding new cabling may puncture fire-rated walls, while increased occupancy may demand additional exits or sprinkler coverage.

Owners must treat every renovation as a new chapter, with approvals, reviews and upgrades.

As the saying goes, a building that changes without updating its fire protection is like a car driven without brakes.

Preparing for the inevitable

No matter how strong the design or diligent the maintenance, emergencies can and do occur.

At this stage, the focus shifts from systems to people.

Fire drills, as mandated by NFPA 101, translate theory into practice and have been shown to reduce evacuation times by up to 35 percent.

Modern advances are adding new layers of protection: voice evacuation systems that deliver clear instructions, AI-driven evacuation tools that adapt to real-time smoke and crowd movement and dynamic exit signage that redirects occupants when familiar pathways are blocked.

Even the end of a building’s life cycle brings risks.

Demolition and decommissioning involve hot works, temporary electrical wiring and combustible debris, all of which are potential ignition sources.

NFPA 241 sets strict requirements for construction and demolition safety, while NFPA 14 requires standpipes to remain available in partially demolished high-rise structures until the process is complete.

Fire safety must remain in place until the last wall comes down.

A thread that never breaks

Fire safety is not a one-time achievement but a continuous journey, running like an unbroken thread from the first sketch on paper to the final swing of the wrecking ball.

It demands the commitment of architects, engineers, contractors, regulators, owners and occupants alike.

When managed correctly, the reward is not measured only in compliance certificates but in lives saved and tragedies prevented.

A safe building, in the end, is not the result of one decision, but of a thousand small decisions made right, every day, for decades.

About The Author

Yaser Mohammed is the Fire Life Safety Design Manager at Diriyah Company.

He is an experienced fire protection engineer with more than a decade of work across construction, consultancy, and emergency response.

A member of the NFPA 101 Certification Advisory Group and holder of eight certifications from NFPA and ICC, he specialises in fire and life safety design.

Proficient in Saudi Arabia’s local regulations and the wider GCC market, Yaser ensures that projects align with both local and international standards.

At Diriyah Company, he leads safety design initiatives and works closely with stakeholders to deliver compliant and effective solutions.

Dedicated to advancing safety practice, his focus is on creating safer, smarter, and more sustainable environments.

This was originally published in the October 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

The MHCLG’s latest appointment signals a turning point for construction accountability

Thouria Istephan appointed interim Chief Construction Adviser

A new interim Chief Construction Adviser has been appointed by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).

The appointment, announced on 30 September 2025, sees architect Thouria Istephan take on the role.

She will provide independent, expert advice to ministers and government on building safety and regulatory reform.

The MHCLG said the appointment is a key milestone in delivering the government’s response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations.

Her work will support the development of a safer, more accountable construction sector with residents’ interests central to decision-making.

Role to support building safety and reform

The MHCLG confirmed that Istephan will serve in the role for 12 months on a part-time basis.

Her appointment was made through a direct ministerial process in line with Cabinet Office guidance.

The ministry said the interim position allows essential work to start immediately while the permanent role is established next year.

Her responsibilities will include advising on regulatory design and the ongoing transformation of the built environment sector.

According to the MHCLG, Istephan’s experience in architectural design and safety oversight will help ensure reform efforts continue to advance at pace.

Minister highlights experience and leadership

Samantha Dixon, Minister for Building Safety, said: “Ms Istephan brings extensive experience and a strong commitment to public service that will bring valuable insight and meaningful change to building safety in this country.

“It also allows us to restore trust and improve safety, accountability and confidence across the sector.”

Dixon said the new appointment reflects the government’s ongoing effort to strengthen leadership in construction safety.

Istephan reflects on her appointment

Interim Chief Construction Adviser Thouria Istephan said: “This role enables me to apply my extensive architectural experience, together with insights gained through my work on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

“It represents a unique opportunity to provide independent advice that promotes progressive and proportionate standards.

“I am committed to playing my part in addressing the devastating consequences of past failures – on people, on the environment, and on the innocent lives lost – as well as the enduring emotional and financial burdens that so many continue to face.”

Before joining the Grenfell Tower Inquiry panel, Istephan held senior roles at several international design and architectural practices.

Her previous positions included Construction Design Management Manager, partner and Technical Design Deputy across large-scale projects and sectors.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The appointment of Thouria Istephan as interim Chief Construction Adviser is relevant for building safety officers, architects, fire engineers and regulatory compliance professionals.

Her advisory work will inform government policy on building safety reform and the implementation of Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations.

Changes arising from her input could affect construction standards, design practices and the regulation of fire-safety measures within the built environment.

Professionals involved in design, inspection and risk assessment of buildings may need to align with updated guidance or new frameworks emerging from this advisory period.

This article was informed by information from the following source: the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

New Zealand building code to undergo fire safety updates

Public feedback prompts review of New Zealand building code fire safety rules

New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has reported that the government will amend building code fire safety provisions following public consultation in late 2024.

The ministry stated that the review was initiated after the Loafers Lodge fire in Wellington in May 2023, which caused five fatalities and prompted renewed attention on building safety.

The consultation ran from 23 October to 24 December 2024 and received 112 submissions, the highest number for a fire safety consultation in the past decade.

Submissions were made by architects, engineers, building consent authorities, product suppliers, building owners and occupants, disabled persons’ organisations and Fire and Emergency New Zealand.

MBIE said the review sought feedback on the clarity, effectiveness and modern relevance of the fire safety rules in the building code, without proposing specific changes at the time.

Concerns over complexity and clarity in current fire safety rules

According to MBIE, many submitters said the current framework is overly complex, with confusing building classifications and unclear language.

The ministry stated that these factors were causing inconsistent compliance decisions, delays in consenting processes and difficulties for owners in maintaining buildings.

Feedback indicated that building code requirements need to be clear on protection levels according to building types and users.

Respondents also said the rules must address specific fire hazards to ensure they are fit for purpose and cost-effective.

MBIE noted that several submissions highlighted the need to minimise gaps and inconsistencies to provide greater certainty and consistency in the system.

Changing building use and modern construction methods

MBIE reported that many submissions emphasised the need for fire safety rules to reflect changes in urban design, building use and construction practices since the last major update in 2012.

The ministry stated that evolving building technology, materials and construction methods have introduced new complexities to both fire safety and firefighting operations.

Respondents agreed that fire safety provisions must keep pace with these developments to remain effective.

There was also support for aligning building code requirements with the operational realities of modern-day firefighting.

MBIE said this would ensure the rules continue to protect building occupants and firefighters during emergency situations.

Accessibility and evacuation requirements

According to MBIE, a recurring theme in the submissions was the need to ensure safe evacuation for all building occupants, including people with disabilities.

The ministry stated that particular attention was given to larger residential accommodation such as hotels, motels and boarding houses.

Respondents agreed that evacuation requirements should consider diverse occupant needs and building uses.

Feedback also indicated support for targeted fire hazard management in these settings.

Government response and next steps

Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said: “The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has today released the summary of submissions from last year’s consultation on fire safety regulations in the Building Code.

“The review was launched following the devastating fire at Loafers Lodge in Wellington, which sadly claimed the lives of five people in May 2023.

“The recent tragedy here and similar incidents overseas have made it clear we need to look closely at how safe our buildings are, especially larger residential accommodation.

“More than 100 organisations, businesses, and individuals across New Zealand shared their insights during the consultation. I want to thank everyone who took the time to make a submission.

“Since the last update of the Building Code fire safety regulations in 2012, building uses, technology, materials and construction methods have evolved rapidly – adding new complexities to fire safety in our buildings and to firefighting.

“Many submitters agreed that the current framework is overly complex, with confusing building classifications and unclear language.

“These issues are causing inconsistent compliance decisions, consenting delays and challenges for owners trying to maintain buildings.

“Respondents agreed that it is essential for all building occupants to be able to evacuate safely, including people with disabilities and those in accommodation like hotels, motels and boarding houses.

“Others agreed the rules should target specific fire hazards to ensure requirements are fit-for-purpose and cost-effective.

“There was also support for ensuring fire safety provisions in the Building Code align with the realities of modern-day firefighting to protect firefighters while doing their jobs. Submitters agreed that New Zealand’s rules need to keep pace with new technologies and construction methods.

“We have a clear mandate to strengthen protections for New Zealanders by updating our fire safety requirements for buildings.

“I have instructed the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment to incorporate this feedback into proposed Building Code changes for Cabinet to consider early next year.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The proposed amendments to New Zealand’s building code fire safety provisions will impact how building designs, construction methods and safety systems are assessed for compliance.

Fire engineers, building consent authorities and safety consultants will need to account for any updated requirements in their work once the changes are enacted.

The emphasis on accessibility, hazard targeting and alignment with modern firefighting will require sector professionals to adapt designs and strategies to meet revised standards.

Ongoing awareness of regulatory developments will be essential to ensure compliance and operational readiness in both new projects and existing buildings.

New Zealand to amend building code fire safety rules: Summary

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has released a summary of submissions from its 2024 public consultation on fire safety provisions in the building code.

The consultation followed the Loafers Lodge fire in Wellington in May 2023.

The consultation received 112 submissions between 23 October and 24 December 2024.

Participants included industry professionals, building owners, occupants, and Fire and Emergency New Zealand.

Many submissions said the current framework is complex and unclear.

Concerns were raised about inconsistent compliance decisions and delays.

Respondents called for clear requirements based on building types and users.

Submissions supported aligning rules with modern construction and firefighting practices.

Accessibility and safe evacuation for all occupants were identified as priorities.

The government will propose building code changes for Cabinet consideration in early 2026.

UK Government appoints expert panel for building regulation review

Panel formed to review statutory building regulation guidance

The UK’s Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has announced the appointment of six members to the Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance panel.

The government said the panel will support its response to the Phase 2 recommendations from the Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry, specifically the need to review statutory guidance that supports compliance with Building Regulations.

The panel will provide expert input into the structure, production and presentation of the Approved Documents, which set out examples and explanations to support compliance with functional requirements.

According to the Ministry, the Building Safety Regulator was commissioned in December 2024 to lead the fundamental review.

The new panel will provide an interim update in early 2026 and a final report by summer 2026.

Building Safety Minister outlines goals of review

Minister for Building Safety Alex Norris said the panel was central to ensuring guidance remains clear and effective.

Norris said: “The appointment of this panel is an important step in our response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry. Guidance which supports compliance with Building Regulations must be clear, accurate, and practical, and subject to regular updates to ensure it remains effective.

“The work of the panel will support our delivery of 1.5 million new homes, by making compliance easier, improving safety and quality in construction, and ensuring greater confidence in the building safety system.

“I look forward to receiving the panel’s recommendations.”

The Ministry confirmed that the panel will operate in an advisory capacity.

It added that further updates, including the Terms of Reference, will be published in due course.

Approved Documents under scrutiny after Grenfell

The Ministry stated that Building Regulations set the minimum legal standards for construction work in England and are supported by Approved Documents which give guidance on compliance.

Following concerns raised by the Grenfell Inquiry about the clarity and adequacy of this guidance, responsibility for reviewing and updating the documents was transferred to the Building Safety Regulator in April 2023.

This transfer was made in line with the Building Safety Act 2022, which mandates the Regulator to monitor safety and standards across the built environment.

The December 2024 commissioning of the fundamental review followed a call for urgent reform by the Inquiry.

The newly appointed panel has been established to inform the review process.

Backgrounds of appointed panel members

The panel includes six members with expertise across planning, architecture, digital standards, housebuilding and fire safety.

Dinah Bornat, architect and Director of ZCD, brings experience in people-centred development and urban design.

Dan Rossiter, Built Environment Sector Lead at the British Standards Institute, has worked extensively in technical documentation and digital information management.

Danielle Michalska-Morris, Director of Research and Technical Innovation at Taylor Wimpey, will contribute knowledge in low carbon design and building services.

Rachel Ferguson, Senior Development Manager at Pocket Living, has experience in affordable housing, planning policy and estate regeneration.

Professor Luke Bisby, Chair of Fire and Structures at the University of Edinburgh, was an expert witness in the Grenfell Inquiry and provides insight on structural fire safety.

Dr Hywel Davies, former Technical Director of CIBSE, previously chaired the Building Regulations Advisory Committee and brings broad technical experience.

Timelines and next steps for the review

According to the Ministry, the panel is expected to deliver an interim update in early 2026.

A final report is scheduled for publication in summer 2026.

The review is expected to influence how future guidance is written, structured and applied across sectors.

The panel’s work forms part of a wider effort to improve safety, clarity and accountability in the UK building regulation system.

Further announcements will include the panel’s full terms and working approach.

Government appoints expert panel for building regulation review: Summary

The UK government has appointed a six-member panel to support a review of guidance linked to Building Regulations.

The panel was formed in response to the Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations.

The Building Safety Regulator will lead the review.

The review focuses on how statutory guidance, known as Approved Documents, is produced and structured.

An interim update is expected in early 2026.

A final report is scheduled for summer 2026.

Minister Alex Norris said the panel supports efforts to build 1.5 million new homes.

Dinah Bornat, Dan Rossiter, Danielle Michalska-Morris, Rachel Ferguson, Professor Luke Bisby and Dr Hywel Davies were named to the panel.

The panel will serve in an advisory capacity.

Johnson Controls completes HVAC business sale to Bosch

Johnson Controls confirms $8.1 billion HVAC divestment

Johnson Controls has announced the completion of its sale of the Residential and Light Commercial HVAC business to the Bosch Group.

According to Johnson Controls, the all-cash transaction is valued at $8.1 billion.

The company confirmed that it has received approximately $5 billion in net cash proceeds after taxes and transaction-related expenses.

Johnson Controls said the deal includes its North America ducted business and its global residential joint venture with Hitachi, while certain Hitachi ductless HVAC assets in Japan remain with Hitachi.

The company added that the divestment aligns with its strategy to focus on building technologies and services.

CEO comments on transition

Joakim Weidemanis, CEO of Johnson Controls, said: “The completion of this transaction is an important milestone for Johnson Controls and positions our company as a leading pure-play provider of innovative building solutions.

“Johnson Controls is embarking on its next era, and I’m confident in our ability to reach our full potential as a faster-growing, more profitable, technology-based and service-enabled company.

“I look forward to the journey ahead as we transform our industry for years to come and work together to deliver even greater value for our customers, team members and shareholders.

Weidemanis added: “I want to thank the Residential and Light Commercial HVAC team for their service and dedication and wish them the best of success as they join the Bosch Group.”

Transaction details

Johnson Controls said its portion of the consideration amounts to approximately $6.7 billion.

The transaction was initially announced earlier this year as part of a broader restructuring strategy.

The company stated that the agreement is part of its focus on building management systems and services.

According to Johnson Controls, the deal strengthens its balance sheet and creates additional capital return opportunities for shareholders.

The company confirmed that Bosch will now oversee the R&LC HVAC operations and integration.

Capital return plans

Johnson Controls said it will implement a $5 billion accelerated share repurchase program.

This repurchase initiative is part of its existing share buyback authorisation, which currently has $9.8 billion available.

The company expects the program to begin in the coming weeks.

According to Johnson Controls, the repurchase will be funded from the proceeds of the HVAC sale.

The company added that the transaction provides resources to drive long-term growth and shareholder value.

Market outlook

Johnson Controls explained that its exit from the residential HVAC segment allows greater focus on core building solutions.

The company noted that it aims to expand its offerings in automation, energy efficiency, and integrated services.

Industry observers, as reported by Johnson Controls, have indicated that the Bosch acquisition strengthens Bosch’s HVAC presence in North America and Asia.

The company said that it expects its remaining operations to achieve stronger margins and improved growth trajectories.

Johnson Controls stated that it remains committed to technology-based building management solutions.

Johnson Controls completes HVAC business sale to Bosch: summary

Johnson Controls has completed the sale of its Residential and Light Commercial HVAC business to the Bosch Group.

The all-cash transaction is valued at $8.1 billion.

Johnson Controls’ portion of the consideration is approximately $6.7 billion.

Net cash proceeds to Johnson Controls after tax and expenses are around $5 billion.

The deal includes the North America ducted business and the global residential joint venture with Hitachi.

Hitachi has retained certain ductless HVAC assets in Shimizu, Japan.

Johnson Controls plans to return a portion of the proceeds through a $5 billion accelerated share repurchase program.

The program is expected to begin in the coming weeks.

The transaction was previously announced earlier this year.

Johnson Controls confirmed the sale aligns with its strategy to focus on building technologies and services.

Training launched to support resident directors in building safety roles

Free digital course available for RTM and RMC directors

The Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE) has announced a new free training programme aimed at improving building safety understanding among resident directors in England.

According to LEASE, the digital training was developed in collaboration with the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) to help directors of Right to Manage (RTM) and Resident Management Companies (RMCs) meet their legal duties under the Building Safety Act 2022.

The initiative is designed to help non-professionals understand their responsibilities for managing fire and structural risks in residential buildings over 18 metres in height.

LEASE stated that more than 3,500 RTMs, RMCs and Commonhold Associations operate across England, many of which rely on unpaid resident volunteers to manage safety obligations.

The training aims to simplify complex legal requirements, whether duties are undertaken directly or delegated, and equips directors to assess the quality of services they receive.

Legal context under the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced new regulatory duties following the Grenfell Tower fire.

LEASE explained that individuals who manage buildings above 18 metres must now take on formal roles as Accountable Persons (APs) or Principal Accountable Persons (PAPs), even if operational tasks are outsourced.

The advisory body said that volunteer directors must remain legally responsible, regardless of whether external managing agents or third parties are involved.

The training addresses how to remain compliant within these roles and what directors should know when commissioning professional advice or services.

LEASE added that the training builds confidence in making informed decisions that affect safety and compliance.

Course structure and topics

LEASE said the training comprises four 30-minute eLearning modules.

Module 1 covers preparation for the new safety regime, including the Golden Thread requirement.

Module 2 addresses managing building safety risks and preparing the Safety Case Report.

Module 3 focuses on resident engagement, mandatory occurrence reporting, and complaint handling.

Module 4 outlines the Building Assessment Certificate process and regulatory interactions.

The course uses practical examples and plain language to make the regulatory framework easier to understand.

Applicability across the housing sector

LEASE stated that while the course is targeted at RTM and RMC directors, it is also relevant for others involved in managing residential buildings.

This includes freeholders, housing associations, local authorities, and professional building safety managers.

Managing agents and leaseholders are also encouraged to complete the training to better understand obligations and financial charges.

According to LEASE, the course aims to support everyone involved in building management, not just those with formal legal duties.

The organisation emphasised the importance of shared understanding across all stakeholders.

Joint statement from LEASE and the Building Safety Regulator

Ella Norman, Senior Legal Advisor at LEASE, said: “The new Building Safety eLearning programme fills a critical knowledge gap in building safety guidance.

“Many leaseholders that have volunteered, unpaid, to help manage their high-rise residential buildings often have limited formal training yet now carry significantly more legal responsibility.

“This training will ensure that residents involved in managing high-rise residential buildings have access to the knowledge they need to carry out their legal duties confidently and competently.

“In collaboration with the Building Safety Regulator, we created this free online course to empower and protect both residents and resident directors.”

Andy McGrory, Policy Lead for resident matters at the Building Safety Regulator, said: “We are delighted to have worked with LEASE to make this invaluable training openly available to the directors of thousands of high-rise Resident Management Companies.

“Their role is critical in upholding the highest standards of building safety for high-rise residents across England.

“This programme provides RMCs with the information needed to understand their responsibilities, to work towards implementing robust building safety measures, to be intelligent customers where they secure assistance from third-party providers and to ensure residents feel safe and are safe in their own homes.”

Resident directors, leaseholders and housing professionals can access the Building Safety eLearning via the LEASE website.

Building safety training launched for resident directors in England: Summary

LEASE and the Building Safety Regulator have released a free online training course.

The training targets directors of Right to Manage and Resident Management Companies in England.

It addresses legal duties introduced by the Building Safety Act 2022.

The course includes four interactive 30-minute modules.

Topics include risk management, resident engagement, and safety certification.

The course is also relevant for freeholders, housing associations, and managing agents.

The aim is to help directors understand their roles and legal responsibilities.

It uses clear language and real-life examples.

LEASE said over 3,500 such resident-led groups exist across England.

Ella Norman of LEASE said the training fills a gap in formal safety education.

Andy McGrory of BSR said the training supports consistent standards in high-rise buildings.

The Building Safety eLearning course is now publicly available.

UK building safety research launched by BESA and Barbour ABI

MEP sector compliance under review in new building safety survey

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has announced new research into how UK firms are responding to the current building safety regime.

The research is being carried out with construction analysts Barbour ABI.

BESA said the aim is to evaluate levels of compliance across the mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) sector under the Building Safety Act.

The news follows changes announced by the UK Government, which removed enforcement responsibility from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

According to BESA, this is the second annual building safety survey targeting organisations of all sizes.

The organisation said it will assess levels of legal understanding, individual competence, and organisational capability across the MEP supply chain.

Fast-track measures follow planning delays and low approvals

BESA stated the research comes at a time of policy changes and growing urgency around planning approvals.

According to BESA, delays and a shortage of assessors prompted the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to introduce a fast-track scheme.

The new scheme is being led by two former senior fire officers.

A Freedom of Information request submitted by cost consultant Cast revealed that only 10.8 percent of Gateway 2 project applications had been approved.

The association said these low figures had raised concern among industry bodies and highlighted the practical challenges of meeting planning regulations.

BESA also pointed to renewed public scrutiny following the release of the Netflix documentary Grenfell: Uncovered, which revisited the causes and consequences of the Grenfell Tower fire.

Survey aims to identify barriers to compliance

Rachel Davidson, BESA’s director of specialist knowledge, said the survey aims to uncover obstacles to legal compliance.

Davidson said: “We want to find out what is preventing organisations from adopting the requirements of the legislation.”

She added: “Levels of awareness and understanding of the Act have improved in the past 12 months, but it is a far from consistent picture.”

She continued: “We are seeing very big variations by role and type of organisation.”

She said: “Those with greater understanding, particularly of individual competence and organisational capability, are more likely to have taken steps to comply with the Act.”

BESA said the survey will explore role-specific awareness, track behavioural change, and examine why some organisations have not adapted their practices.

According to Davidson, lack of support remains a key issue: “Where action has not been taken, it is often due to a lack of clarity, guidance, or support.”

She added: “Identifying these barriers will inform targeted interventions to improve industry-wide compliance.”

Industry Competence Committee input included

BESA stated the new survey includes input from Jon Vanstone, chair of the Industry Competence Committee (ICC).

The ICC advises the Building Safety Regulator on matters relating to individual and organisational competence.

Vanstone said: “BESA’s research comes at an important time because pressure is building to get more projects through planning gateways.”

He added: “However, this also raises the stakes around competence and compliance because the industry will still need to meet rigorous safety standards as workloads increase.”

He continued: “Therefore, any findings that help us understand why companies might be struggling to meet the requirements will be incredibly helpful in shaping our advice to the regulator.”

BESA said the inclusion of ICC questions will help shape guidance and education efforts for the wider sector.

Legislative intent remains a central focus

The UK Government has pledged to hire 100 new planning specialists to reduce project delays.

According to BESA, this is linked to the Government’s goal of delivering 1.5 million homes during the current parliamentary term.

Alex Norris, Minister for Building Safety, said: “We’re enhancing operations, reducing delays, and unlocking the homes this country desperately needs – while keeping safety front and centre.”

BESA chief executive officer David Frise said the sector must remember the reason the legislation was created.

Frise said: “The Netflix documentary was a timely reminder to anyone involved in a building project that every decision they make has a consequence.”

He added: “If you are making a change to a design (possibly for very valid reasons) what impact will that have, ultimately, on the people who inhabit that building?”

Frise continued: “The research we are launching aims to understand why so many companies and individuals are still not changing their behaviour because, ultimately, this has to be about doing the right thing – even when no-one is looking.”

UK building safety research launched by BESA and Barbour ABI: Summary

The Building Engineering Services Association has launched new research on building safety compliance.

The study is being carried out with Barbour ABI.

It targets mechanical, electrical and plumbing sector firms across the UK.

It will assess awareness, behaviour, and legal understanding under the Building Safety Act.

The research follows the removal of enforcement powers from the HSE.

A new fast-track planning process has been introduced under the MHCLG.

Only 10.8 percent of Gateway 2 applications have been approved, according to Cast.

The study includes questions provided by the Industry Competence Committee.

The Government has pledged to hire 100 new specialists to speed up planning.

The research also responds to renewed public interest following the Grenfell documentary.

David Frise said the survey aims to identify why compliance remains inconsistent.

Rachel Davidson said understanding varies across roles and organisation types.

Fire safety compliance inspections expand across Hong Kong

Government outlines inspection and prosecution progress

More than 8,600 Fire Hazard Abatement Notices (FHANs) have been issued in Hong Kong following inspections of older high-risk buildings, according to the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

The fire safety inspections followed a 2024 fire at New Lucky House in Jordan that resulted in five deaths and 40 injuries.

The government reported that among around 1,000 composite buildings inspected, over 2,100 FHANs were issued to “three-nil buildings”, which have no owners’ corporation, no management company and no residents’ organisation.

District-level figures show that Sham Shui Po received the highest number of FHANs at 1,074.

A total of 324 successful prosecutions and convictions were secured across the 18 districts.

The most common cause of prosecution was smoke stop door irregularities, accounting for 259 cases.

Compliance rate and new inspection plans

As of the end of June 2025, the Fire Services Department (FSD) reported that over 90 percent of the 8,661 issued FHANs had been complied with.

In March 2025, the FSD created the Divisional Public Safety Team to increase district-level enforcement and community engagement across Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories.

The department stated that it will proactively inspect 1,800 old buildings over the next year.

These efforts are part of a broader strategy to raise compliance with the Fire Safety (Buildings) Ordinance among composite and domestic buildings constructed on or before 1987.

According to the Government, approximately 14,000 buildings fall under this legislation, and around 11,430 have already been inspected.

Progress on defaulted works and pilot programme

Following the December 2024 amendment to the Fire Safety (Buildings) Ordinance, authorities can now carry out fire safety works directly when building owners fail to do so.

The Government confirmed that 10 buildings have been selected under a pilot defaulted works scheme, with over half of them being “three-nil buildings”.

The authorities expect the first of these building upgrades to be completed by mid-2026.

Work consultancy and contractor contracts are planned to be awarded in the third quarter of 2025.

The Government stated that cost estimates will only be provided after assessments are completed by appointed consultants.

In addition to the pilot works, building-level compliance data is now published online to help inform prospective tenants and buyers.

Future expansion of improvement projects

The Government said it expects to extend defaulted works to between 20 and 60 buildings per year in the future.

It plans to assess the programme’s progress and determine the scale of future implementation based on sector capacity and inter-departmental coordination.

A long-term strategy will be developed to support owners facing genuine obstacles in upgrading their buildings.

The authorities confirmed that resourcing and contractor availability will shape how many additional properties can be included annually.

Efforts are ongoing to ensure the model remains sustainable and effective.

Internet of Things trial for early detection

The FSD is also piloting a fire detection system using Internet of Things (IoT) sensors to send alerts directly to emergency services.

Sensors may be installed in flats or communal areas to provide faster fire detection and improve response times.

Only a limited number of buildings per district are currently being invited to participate in the scheme.

The FSD said it is using criteria such as building age, number of storeys and whether a property is a “three-nil building” to decide which buildings are eligible.

The pilot is part of a broader strategy to explore technology use in fire detection, including 5G, AI and big data.

Fire safety compliance inspections expand across Hong Kong: Summary

The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region has reported that 8,661 Fire Hazard Abatement Notices have been issued following inspections of 1,000 high-risk buildings.

A total of 2,112 of these notices were issued to “three-nil buildings”.

There were 324 successful prosecutions, with most involving smoke stop door irregularities.

More than 90 percent of the issued notices have been complied with.

The Fire Services Department will inspect 1,800 additional buildings over the next year.

A Divisional Public Safety Team was established in March 2025 to enhance enforcement.

Ten buildings have been selected for a pilot scheme allowing the government to complete fire safety upgrades on behalf of non-compliant owners.

More than half of the pilot buildings are “three-nil buildings”.

The first works are expected to finish by mid-2026.

Contract procurement is scheduled for the third quarter of 2025.

Costs will be confirmed after consultant assessments.

Authorities expect to complete 20 to 60 defaulted works annually in future.

Building compliance status is now published online.

An Internet of Things detection system is being trialled in selected buildings.

Thousands of high-rise residents left unprotected by missing fire safety plans

One-third of required plans still missing across England

New analysis by FASTSIGNS has reported that many high-rise buildings in England are still not meeting legal requirements under fire safety regulations, with a third of key documentation still outstanding.

According to data sourced by FASTSIGNS from 24 fire and rescue services through Freedom of Information requests, an average of 32 per cent of building plans and 31 per cent of external wall plans for high-rise residential buildings remain unsubmitted.

These documents are required under the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022, which came into force on 23 January 2023 following the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017.

The regulation mandates that responsible persons for high-rise residential buildings of 7 storeys or more must provide up-to-date building and external wall plans to their local fire service.

FASTSIGNS stated that the lack of these plans limits fire services’ ability to prepare for emergencies and obstructs residents’ access to clear exit signage during incidents.

Regional differences in plan submissions

Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service recorded the highest submission rates, receiving 157 per cent of required building plans and 164 per cent of wall plans for its 42 high-rise buildings.

According to FASTSIGNS, Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service ranked second, reporting submission rates of 108 per cent for building plans and 118 per cent for wall plans.

Oxfordshire, Derbyshire, North Yorkshire and Shropshire all reported 100 per cent submissions across both categories.

In contrast, Avon Fire and Rescue Service reported the lowest building plan submissions at just 10 per cent across its 239 high-rise buildings.

Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service received the lowest number of wall plans, with only 22 per cent submitted for its 65 qualifying buildings.

FASTSIGNS stated that the national average across the 24 services surveyed stood at 68 per cent for building plans and 69 per cent for external wall plans.

Fire safety regulation introduced following Grenfell Tower fire

The regulation requiring up-to-date signage and safety documentation was introduced following recommendations made in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower tragedy in July 2017.

Emergency services responding to the incident reported difficulty navigating the building due to the absence of clear signage and building information.

FASTSIGNS explained that the regulation is intended to enable fire services to develop response strategies in advance and support safe evacuation routes for residents.

The company added that certified signage, combined with clear building plans, plays a central role in fire safety preparation for high-rise residential buildings.

John Davies, managing director of FASTSIGNS UK, said: “The tragedy of Grenfell highlighted just how critical clear signage, proper planning and up-to-date safety measures are in ensuring control during an emergency.

“In the case of fire safety, certified and easily visible signage is essential for guiding both residents and emergency response teams through high-rise buildings when an incident occurs, helping to avoid confusion and save lives.

“Our latest research shows that while progress is being made, there are still some challenges to overcome.

“For example, on average, around a third of building plans remain incomplete and audit frequencies can be inconsistent.

“While it’s encouraging to see increased focus on regular, defined checks before and during the construction of high-rise residential buildings, it’s equally important to ensure these checks continue throughout the building’s lifespan.

“We’re continuing to work closely with our customers across England, ensuring that buildings meet the evolving fire safety requirements to safeguard everyone involved.”

Audit and inspection practices vary across fire services

FASTSIGNS also reported that 50 per cent of fire services surveyed confirmed they conduct audits of high-rise buildings, though timeframes and approaches varied.

The company stated that some services conduct annual inspections, while others work on a rolling four-year cycle or base their audits on local risk assessments.

According to the research, there is no consistent national standard for inspection frequency, with practices differing between fire authorities.

Some fire services referenced the use of national guidance to determine inspection schedules, while others described localised or reactive methods.

FASTSIGNSconcluded that the variability in audit procedures could affect how effectively fire safety is maintained over time in different regions.

Industry response calls for improved training

Nicola John, managing director of FDM (Fire Door Maintenance) – Training and Development, commented on the findings of the research.

John said: “This research highlights just how much work still needs to be done to ensure our high-rise buildings are truly safe.

“At FDM – Training and Development, we believe safeguarding lives starts with empowering those responsible, which is why we deliver training for the industry, by the industry, across every level of the supply chain.

“Everyone involved, from manufacturers and installers, to responsible persons, needs the knowledge and confidence to meet their legal duties and protect the people living in these buildings.”

Incomplete fire safety plans hinder UK fire services: Summary

FASTSIGNS has reported that fire services in England are still missing one-third of building and wall plans required by updated fire safety regulations.

The data was sourced through Freedom of Information requests to 24 fire and rescue services across England.

Staffordshire reported the highest submission rates, with over 150 per cent of both building and wall plans received.

Avon and Bedfordshire reported the lowest submission rates, with just 10 per cent and 22 per cent received respectively.

The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 require these documents to be submitted for high-rise residential buildings of 7 storeys or more.

The regulation was introduced following the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017.

The aim is to improve emergency response readiness and resident evacuation through signage and plan availability.

Audit practices also differ across fire services, with 50 per cent confirming inspections but offering varied timelines.

FASTSIGNS stated that inconsistent audit frequency may impact fire safety compliance.

The company highlighted the role of signage and planning in supporting emergency services and residents.

FDM said industry training is essential to help responsible persons meet legal obligations.