NFCC pushes back on fire funding model that risks winners and losers across England

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has welcomed Government plans that would allow standalone fire and rescue authorities to keep core funding in line with inflation if they increase council tax precepts by £5.

The changes are set out in the Local Government Finance Policy Statement 2026-27 to 2028-29 following months of pressure from NFCC and fire and rescue services over earlier proposals that could have reduced budgets in real terms.

Under the new approach, any standalone fire and rescue authority that uses the £5 council tax flexibility will see its core spending power rise at least in line with inflation as measured by the GDP deflator.

The Government has also confirmed a review of the fire funding formula and a package of £2.1 million in transitional support for areas transferring fire functions to Mayoral Strategic Authorities or undergoing local government reorganisation.

Fire Chiefs have welcomed the move to set out funding proposals across a three-year period, noting that longer-term settlements can ease planning pressures compared with one-year deals.

Phil Garrigan, National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) Chair, said: “We welcome the Government’s recognition of the urgent need to stabilise fire and rescue funding and its commitment to review the formula – this is confirmation that they have listened to our concerns.

“These steps are vital to avoid immediate harm, but we now need to go further to address the impact of a decade of underinvestment, including the loss of almost £1 billion in capital investment.

“This progress reflects the collective efforts of many across the sector – including trade unions – as well as those in politically influential positions, who have consistently championed the often-unseen work of fire and rescue services.

“Fire and rescue services are right there at the forefront of public safety, and NFCC will continue to lead the sector’s work to ensure funding reflects the growing and changing risks we face.

“We need to work through the detail of what these changes mean for fire and rescue services in real terms, but they form a positive step in the right direction.”

NFCC funding analysis warns of uneven impact

NFCC said its earlier modelling showed that previous grant proposals could have produced real terms budget cuts of more than £100 million over three years.

The organisation linked those projections to changes proposed under Fair Funding Review 2.0, which place greater weight on population growth when distributing national fire funding.

NFCC analysis indicated that areas with faster population growth would gain a larger share of the fixed funding pot, leaving slower-growing regions exposed to deeper reductions.

The council highlighted that some of those slower-growing areas also face complex hazards, including chemical sites, high-rise buildings and high levels of deprivation.

NFCC warned that a purely population-driven funding model risked creating clear winners and losers across the country, even where underlying risk profiles differ.

Following the Government’s revised proposals, NFCC believes the combination of a £5 council tax flexibility and the new spending floor will enable standalone fire and rescue authorities to keep pace with inflation if they fully use the precept increase.

The organisation is urging those authorities to make use of the flexibility to avoid avoidable reductions in service provision.

NFCC said the position for county council fire and rescue services is more complex and that it is awaiting further detail to understand the implications for those services.

Service pressures grow as demand increases

NFCC stated that fire and rescue services are already operating under pressure as demand and risk evolve.

Recent data from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) shows that fire and rescue services in England attended 628,764 incidents in the year ending June 2025.

NFCC noted that this total represents a 25% rise over the level recorded a decade ago.

Over the same period, firefighter numbers in England have fallen by 25%, equating to around 11,000 fewer wholetime firefighters since 2008.

NFCC said that services are being asked to respond to the UK’s growing challenges linked to climate change, emerging technology risks and an expanding role in civil resilience and community safety.

The council pointed to the impact of almost £1 billion in lost capital investment over the past decade, with ageing estates and mounting pressures affecting how services maintain and upgrade their infrastructure.

NFCC is calling for sustainable investment to match the demands placed on fire and rescue services so that they can continue to keep communities safe now and in the future.

Funding reforms and planning for fire services

The Government’s council tax flexibility and inflation floor are directly relevant to fire and rescue chiefs and senior officers who are planning budgets and operational capacity for the next three years.

Standalone fire and rescue authorities that choose to use the £5 precept increase can maintain core spending power in real terms, which will shape decisions on crewing models, station portfolios and local risk coverage.

Procurement officers and those responsible for estates will need to set investment priorities in the context of NFCC’s reference to almost £1 billion in lost capital funding and the pressures from ageing buildings and equipment.

Government departments and local government finance teams involved in fire governance will need to interpret the forthcoming review of the fire funding formula and assess how population-based allocations interact with local risk factors such as high-rise buildings or chemical sites.

Risk assessors and fire engineering consultants working with services in areas of slower population growth may see increased focus on how changing grant distributions align with hazards and deprivation levels.

Data from MHCLG on rising incident numbers and reduced firefighter headcount in England provides a quantitative backdrop for discussions on staffing, resilience and future funding requirements.

Fire Brigades Union warns of safety risks in Buckinghamshire service reduction plans

Buckinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service faces proposed cuts

Buckinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service could lose eight fire engines and two fire stations under new proposals from the county’s fire authority.

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) said the proposals would see the number of fire engines in the county fall from 30 to 22.

A meeting of the Liberal Democrat–run authority is scheduled for mid-November, where a public consultation could be approved.

The FBU said Buckinghamshire has already faced some of the deepest cuts in England, losing more than a third of its firefighters between 2010 and 2024.

The union said any further reduction in capacity would seriously undermine public safety.

It added that the authority should focus on rebuilding and strengthening the service rather than making further reductions.

FBU calls for investment and recruitment

Mitch Wallace, FBU brigade secretary for Buckinghamshire, said: “Buckinghamshire FBU has consistently campaigned for investment, growth and resilience in our service. This county has already suffered some of the worst cuts in England, with more than a third of firefighter posts gone.

“It’s time to focus on rebuilding, recruiting and retaining firefighters rather than cutting more resources.

“This is especially critical in harder-to-staff areas, where crewing shortages put lives at risk.

“The fire authority should be lobbying the government for the funding we desperately need.

“The priority must be to invest in recruitment, retention, and resources to protect every community in Buckinghamshire.”

Southern region representative criticises “hollowing out” of services

Chris Wycherley, FBU executive council member for the Southern region, said: “For too long, fire and rescue services have been hollowed out by systemic underfunding and short-sighted mismanagement. Fire stations and fire engines are not expendable – they are essential community assets that protect lives, homes and businesses.

“Every closure and every cut leaves communities more vulnerable and erodes response standards further. Cuts today mean weaker response tomorrow.

“To keep firefighters and the public safe, we must invest in our fire services and ensure firefighters are available when emergencies occur.

“Local authorities should join with the Fire Brigades Union in lobbying government for proper, sustained funding. The future of our service must be built on growth, resilience, and investment – not a dangerous race to the bottom.”

National leadership links cuts to wider resource shortages

Steve Wright, FBU general secretary, said: “This summer, firefighters from across England were called upon to travel to the South coast to battle a blazing wildfire due to a lack of resources. With the climate emergency resulting in increasingly severe major incidents, it’s clear that the fire and rescue service is in urgent need of investment.

“Losing resources locally threatens the safety of residents, and impacts fire cover everywhere.

“The only way to keep the public safe is to invest in crews, so that when an emergency happens there are firefighters available and ready to go.

“Cuts kill. The FBU is calling on Labour to put an end to this dangerous austerity, and the union encourages all fire authorities, councillors, MPs, and members of the public to join the call for funding.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The proposed reduction in fire engines and stations in Buckinghamshire raises concerns for fire and rescue managers, command officers and policymakers involved in operational planning and resource allocation.

Reduced frontline capacity could affect response times and coverage, particularly in rural or harder-to-staff areas, creating implications for community safety and mutual aid planning.

Procurement officers, training coordinators and local authority partners may also need to consider how workforce reductions impact recruitment, retention and readiness strategies.

For senior officers, the development reinforces the importance of sustained funding and advocacy for service resilience at both local and national levels.

This article was informed by information from the following source: The Fire Brigades Union