Perimeter Solutions secures FM approval for fluorine-free sprinkler foam

Perimeter Solutions foam approved for fixed systems

Perimeter Solutions has secured FM 5130 approval for SOLBERG EVOLUTION 3% Synthetic Fluorine-Free Foam (SFFF), a Newtonian formulation for aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) and sprinkler applications.

The company said the approval makes SOLBERG EVOLUTION 3% SFFF the first fluorine-free foam on the US Department of Defense’s Qualified Products List (QPL) to also hold FM approval for fixed sprinkler systems.

The approval applies to aircraft hangars, fuel storage facilities and other fixed fire protection systems.

The foam has water-like viscosity and is compatible with standard sprinkler hardware.

It is designed for hydrocarbon fuels including gasoline and kerosene-based fuels such as Jet A and Jet A-1.

The product has demonstrated performance through aspirated and non-aspirated standard sprinkler heads to extinguish and secure Class B hydrocarbon fuel fires.

Zachary Brackin, Manager – Business Development and Southern Region Sales Manager at Perimeter Solutions, said: “Aviation fire protection is evolving, and so is the chemistry behind it.

“This advanced formulation delivers effective fire suppression that meets the strict performance and compliance standards set by FM, UL, ICAO, FAA and the US Department of Defense, helping customers transition to fluorine-free foam that is compatible with their existing fire protection infrastructure.”

Technical approvals and product details

SOLBERG EVOLUTION 3% SFFF has UL 162 and FM 5130 fixed-system approvals with SOLBERG bladder tanks, foam chambers and associated system hardware, including non-aspirated sprinkler heads.

It is designed to meet National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) requirements for hydrocarbon fuel and critical asset protection, including aircraft hangars, JUHI facilities and fuel storage operations.

The product is MIL-SPEC-approved and holds International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Level B certification for ARFF performance, meeting Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and ICAO requirements.

It has been tested in accordance with Boeing Specification Support Standard (BSS 7432) for evaluation of airplane maintenance materials.

The formulation contains no intentionally added per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

It was developed without silicone or siloxane chemistries, biopolymers or thickening agents and is designed to be biodegradable with no persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) profile.

James Perriss, Director of Product Management – Global Suppressants at Perimeter Solutions, said: “SOLBERG Evolution builds on the success of SOLBERG 3% MIL-SPEC SFFF, the first fluorine-free concentrate to be included on the Department of Defense’s Qualified Products List (QPL).

“This formulation expands the range of approved applications, including use with standard sprinkler systems, providing another example of how SOLBERG is advancing fire suppression technology while supporting customers with environmentally responsible, high-performance solutions.”

The company said the Solberg team will be at the National Fire Sprinkler Association North American Fire Sprinkler Expo from April 29 to May 1, 2026.

Cleaner concentrate choices: Inside the global SFFF market expansion

IFSJ’s market report tracks the global SFFF market, sizing demand, forecasts, policy drivers, adoption by region and procurement issues for airports and industrial sites

Synthetic fluorine-free foams (SFFF) are moving from limited use to standard specification for Class B suppression in many sectors.

This shift is being driven by tighter PFAS regulations, the financial burden of managing legacy AFFF inventories and greater scrutiny of foam chemistry by buyers, regulators and insurers.

Airports, petrochemical facilities, marine terminals and municipal fire departments are updating procurement frameworks and operational procedures as they assess performance criteria alongside environmental and legal considerations.

This report examines the global SFFF market, focusing on current valuation, projected growth, adoption drivers and regional demand patterns.

Market overview

SFFF forms part of the broader PFAS-free firefighting foam segment, which remains smaller than the legacy fluorinated foam market but is expanding rapidly.

According to Fact.MR, PFAS-free firefighting foams are projected to grow from $310.0 million in 2026 to $937.3 million by 2036, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 11.7%.

Within this category, synthetic detergent-based fluorine-free foams account for about 44% of the segment, placing the estimated SFFF market value at approximately $136 million in 2026 and projected to reach about $412 million by 2036.

Future Market Insights reports similar expansion trends, forecasting PFAS-free foam growth from $346.3 million in 2026 to more than $1 billion by 2036.

The wider firefighting foam market remains substantially larger.

According to Custom Market Insights, the total global firefighting foam market was valued at approximately $5.82 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $7.57 billion by 2034.

The PFAS-free segment is expected to account for an increasing share of this total as replacement cycles accelerate.

Strengths

SFFF provides an alternative to fluorinated concentrates while maintaining operational capability for Class B suppression.

This transition can simplify chemical management and reduce the long-term liabilities associated with PFAS detection in soil, groundwater and infrastructure.

Manufacturers are developing SFFF formulations designed for compatibility with fixed suppression systems, mobile monitors and portable equipment, subject to validation testing.

This compatibility allows agencies and industrial operators to transition while maintaining existing infrastructure where feasible.

Technical improvements in polymer hydration and concentrate formulation have improved viscosity stability and proportioning reliability, which supports consistent performance during storage and discharge.

This reliability is particularly relevant in environments where foam systems may remain inactive for extended periods.

Alcohol-resistant SFFF variants are expanding operational coverage for facilities handling polar solvents such as ethanol, methanol and acetone.

This allows sites to standardize inventory across multiple hazard classes, reducing storage and logistics complexity.

Challenges

System compatibility verification remains one of the primary barriers to adoption.

Many operators must conduct proportioning tests, discharge verification and documentation to confirm performance with their specific equipment.

This process can require technical support, downtime and capital planning.

Application techniques for fluorine-free foams may differ from legacy fluorinated foams, particularly in low expansion applications.

This requires updated training procedures to ensure effective use in emergency conditions.

Product approval and certification availability can also limit supplier selection.

Buyers often require listings from recognized testing bodies or approval from authorities having jurisdiction, which can extend procurement timelines.

In addition to concentrate replacement, organizations face costs associated with the removal, disposal and remediation of legacy AFFF systems.

Cleanup of contaminated infrastructure, wastewater and soil can represent a large share of transition expenditures.

Recent developments

Regulatory changes are accelerating the transition toward fluorine-free foams.

According to the European Commission, new restrictions on PFAS in firefighting foams took effect in October 2025, with phased transition timelines depending on application.

In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration has approved fluorine-free foam use at Part 139 airports, aligning with Department of Defense specifications published in January 2023.

According to the American Association of Airport Executives, airports are actively transitioning to fluorine-free concentrates and expanding procurement programs.

Legislative funding has also supported adoption.

According to the International Association of Fire Fighters, US legislation has allocated $350 million to support airport foam replacement and cleanup, along with $30 million for vehicle modifications and related infrastructure updates.

Product development continues across multiple manufacturers.

For example, Fomtec introduced Enviro NEO in January 2026, an SFFF concentrate designed for petrochemical, oil and gas and marine applications, reflecting ongoing investment in fluorine-free formulations.

Regional insights

North America is one of the largest SFFF adoption regions, driven by airport compliance requirements, military transition programs and litigation exposure related to PFAS contamination.

Municipal fire departments and industrial operators are also incorporating fluorine-free foam into procurement planning.

Europe is progressing rapidly due to regulatory enforcement and environmental compliance frameworks.

Industrial operators, airports and municipal services are aligning procurement with regional PFAS restrictions and national phase-out schedules.

Asia Pacific presents strong growth potential due to expanding aviation infrastructure, industrial development and regulatory activity.

According to Airservices Australia, fluorine-free foams have already been deployed across Australian civilian airports, demonstrating early transition within the region.

The Middle East is seeing adoption primarily within petrochemical, marine and energy sectors, where large-scale fixed suppression systems require fluorine-free concentrates compatible with seawater and high hazard fuels.

Latin America and Africa remain emerging markets for SFFF adoption.

Uptake is concentrated in oil and gas, mining, ports and aviation sectors, where compliance with international insurance and operational standards is driving procurement decisions.

This was originally published in the March 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

How are manufacturers handling the rise of fluorine-free foam?

IFSJ explores the rise of fluorine-free foam, exploring market shifts, regulatory demands and future outlook

The firefighting foam industry is transitioning toward environmentally sustainable alternatives due to growing regulatory scrutiny over per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

Fluorine-free firefighting foams (F3 foams) are gaining attention as organisations seek solutions that reduce environmental impact without compromising firefighting effectiveness.

This article examines the current state of the F3 foam market, focusing on market dynamics, strengths, challenges, recent developments and regional perspectives.

Market overview

The global fluorine-free firefighting foam market is experiencing growth due to increasing regulatory restrictions on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) found in traditional foams.

According to a report by Grand View Research, the global firefighting foam market size was valued at USD 859.4 million in 2020, with a significant portion attributed to the rising demand for fluorine-free alternatives.

The push for F3 foams is driven by environmental regulations and the need for sustainable firefighting solutions.

Regulatory agencies such as the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) have proposed stringent controls on PFAS under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation.

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has outlined actions to address PFAS contamination through its PFAS Strategic Roadmap.

These initiatives are compelling industries to transition to fluorine-free foams to ensure compliance and reduce environmental liabilities.

Strengths

Fluorine-free foams offer environmental benefits by eliminating PFAS, which are persistent in the environment and have been linked to health risks.

According to the Fire Fighting Foam Coalition, F3 foams reduce the potential for soil and water contamination, aligning with sustainability goals.

Additionally, some F3 foams have demonstrated effective performance in specific fire scenarios.

Manufacturers are developing fluorine-free foams that meet international performance standards, such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Level B and European Standard EN 1568.

Compliance with these standards ensures that F3 foams provide acceptable levels of fire suppression, enabling their use in industries like aviation, petrochemical and municipal firefighting.

Challenges

Despite environmental advantages, fluorine-free foams face challenges related to performance in certain fire situations.

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has noted that F3 foams may require higher application rates or different tactics to achieve similar results to fluorinated foams, particularly when suppressing Class B fires involving flammable liquids.

Cost considerations also impact adoption rates.

Transitioning to fluorine-free foams can involve investment in new equipment or retrofitting existing systems, as F3 foams may not be compatible with equipment designed for fluorinated foams.

Training personnel in the use of new foam types is necessary to maintain effective firefighting operations.

Supply chain factors may affect the availability of raw materials required for F3 foam production.

A study by Frost & Sullivan indicates that fluctuations in raw material prices and supply can influence the overall cost and availability of fluorine-free foams.

Recent developments

Regulatory developments are accelerating the adoption of fluorine-free foams.

The European Union is moving toward a comprehensive ban on PFAS in firefighting foams, with ECHA recommending restrictions that could take effect in the coming years.

In the United States, the National Defense Authorization Act mandates that the Department of Defense cease the use of PFAS-containing foams by 2024.

Manufacturers are responding by investing in research and development to improve the performance of fluorine-free foams.

For example, Solberg, a division of Amerex Corporation, has introduced new F3 foam formulations that claim enhanced firefighting capabilities.

Collaboration between industry and research institutions is ongoing to develop foams that meet both environmental and performance requirements.

Regional insights

Europe is leading in the adoption of fluorine-free firefighting foams, driven by stringent environmental regulations and proactive policy measures.

Countries like Norway and Sweden have implemented bans on PFAS-containing foams, prompting widespread adoption of F3 alternatives.

According to a report by MarketsandMarkets, Europe is expected to dominate the fluorine-free foam market due to these regulatory drivers.

In North America, adoption varies by jurisdiction.

Several US states, including California and Washington, have enacted laws restricting PFAS in firefighting foams.

Industries in these states are transitioning to fluorine-free options to comply with local regulations.

The Asia-Pacific region exhibits varying levels of adoption, influenced by differing regulatory environments and economic factors.

Some countries are beginning to recognise the environmental impact of PFAS, which may lead to increased demand for F3 foams in the future.

This article was originally published in the November 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.