What the latest fire service inspections reveal about preparedness – and where the gaps still lie

HMICFRS grades for Hampshire, County Durham, and Lancashire fire and rescue services

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has released its latest inspection reports for Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service, County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service, and Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service.

The reports for the 2023–2025 inspection cycle grade each service across 11 performance areas, using categories ranging from ‘inadequate’ to ‘outstanding’.

Each inspection highlights examples of good practice, identifies areas where services have made progress since earlier visits, and sets out issues that require further attention.

While all three services showed strong performance in at least one core area – including fire prevention, protection work, and understanding risk – inspectors also found challenges in resource planning, recruitment, equality and diversity, and operational processes.

HMICFRS said the inspections reflect both improvements and persistent gaps in performance across the fire and rescue sector.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service

Strong prevention work and volunteer use

HMICFRS said Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service is “good at providing effective activity through its prevention team to keep people safe from fire and other risks”.

Inspectors praised the way the service uses volunteers to support prevention work, identifying this as “an area of promising practice”.

The report notes that prevention activity is well organised and makes use of both staff and volunteers to target those at greatest risk.

Progress on some earlier concerns

Since its last inspection, the service has improved business continuity plans, particularly in high-risk areas.

It has also developed processes to manage individual performance through performance development reviews.

The inspectorate noted: “The service has put in place a more effective system for staff to use learning and debriefs to improve operational response and incident command.”

These steps were seen as positive progress against earlier recommendations.

Ongoing challenges in response cover and planning

However, the service was told it “doesn’t have an adequate plan or processes to co-ordinate its recruitment and succession planning work including its future needs”.

This means there is no guarantee that staffing levels and skillsets are aligned to the safety plan, either now or in the future.

Inspectors also found that on-call firefighter availability remains an issue, and the service “isn’t consistently maintaining the availability of its fire engines”.

There were also concerns about the mobilisation system, which, when problems occur, “could cause unnecessary delays in the dispatch of resources to emergency incidents and result in the public receiving a slower response”.

His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services Roy Wilsher said: “It is disappointing to see that the service hasn’t made the progress we expected.

“For example, it still needs to make sure senior managers are visible and demonstrate service values through their behaviours.”

He added: “I recognise that recruiting on-call firefighters can be difficult and the service is planning some significant changes to meet the financial challenges it faces.

“I will keep in close contact with the service to monitor these changes and its progress in addressing our concerns and associated recommendations.”

County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service

Outstanding performance in public protection

HMICFRS graded County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service as ‘outstanding’ in protecting the public through fire regulation.

The service ensures “firefighters, supervisory managers and specialist protection staff receive fire safety qualification training”, which supports capacity and resilience.

Inspectors described this as “an area of promising practice” and highlighted the service’s ability to deliver a high volume of home fire safety visits prioritised for those at greatest risk.

Targeted prevention and technology innovation

The service has reviewed and updated its risk-based inspection programme, with a greater focus on higher-risk premises.

Its prevention activity is clearly prioritised towards people most at risk, using a risk-based approach to guide decisions.

The report notes that the service is “using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to help analyse its data and support well-informed decisions to improve productivity” and to “improve the accuracy of risk assessments, helping to prioritise workloads so they align with the needs of the community”.

Inclusion and workforce diversity

While the service was rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ in most areas, one area for improvement was in promoting equality, diversity and inclusion.

HMICFRS said the service “needs to do more to increase staff diversity and encourage applicants from diverse backgrounds into middle and senior-level positions”.

His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services Michelle Skeer said: “I congratulate County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service on its performance in keeping people safe and secure from fire and other risks.”

She added: “The service is now outstanding at protecting the public through fire regulation and effectively uses a risk-based approach to clearly prioritise its prevention activity.”

However, she said: “It should improve how it promotes equality, diversity and inclusion, and how it works with under-represented groups in the community.”

Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service

Six outstanding grades awarded

Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service achieved ‘outstanding’ in six areas and ‘good’ in five, including top marks for understanding risk, protecting the public, and responding to major and multi-agency incidents.

The service “builds a comprehensive risk profile using information from a wide range of sources, including consultation with local communities” and uses IT to share incident information quickly.

An automated post-incident system supports a shared understanding of risk across the service.

Linked protection strategy and community engagement

The service’s protection strategy is “clearly linked to the risks identified in its community risk management plan” and enables effective information sharing between staff.

Inspectors praised its proactive work with businesses to promote compliance with fire safety legislation and noted efficiency gains from reduced attendance to unwanted fire signals.

HMICFRS also said the service “is well prepared for major and multi-agency incidents”, collaborating with the local resilience forum and investing in equipment to respond to wildfire and flooding risks.

Strong organisational culture and leadership

Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service “continues to be outstanding at promoting its values and culture”, with leaders who “demonstrate the service’s values” and staff who feel “appreciated and included”.

However, inspectors said the service “needs to do more to make sure that its equality impact assessment process is robust, and the assessment findings are acted on appropriately”.

Michelle Skeer said: “The service uses a wide range of data to understand risk at a local level, and it has a robust plan and resources in place to inspect its highest-risk buildings.”

She added: “I am confident the service will address the area for improvement we have identified around its equality impact assessment process.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The latest HMICFRS reports offer detailed insight into how three different UK fire and rescue services are performing across core operational, prevention, and protection functions.

For professionals, these findings highlight where specific services are excelling, such as Lancashire’s data-led risk assessment processes, and where systemic challenges remain, including Hampshire’s staffing and mobilisation issues and County Durham’s diversity gaps.

The grades and recommendations in these reports can help benchmark local service performance, inform policy planning, and guide collaborative initiatives across the sector.

They also illustrate the inspectorate’s ongoing focus on prevention, protection, and community risk management – themes that will continue to shape service priorities in the coming years.

By examining both best practice and areas needing improvement, fire safety practitioners, operational leads, and policymakers can better target resources, adapt training, and apply lessons learned to enhance resilience and public safety outcomes.

HMICFRS grades for Hampshire, County Durham, and Lancashire fire and rescue services: Summary

HMICFRS has released new performance reports for Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service, County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service, and Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service.

Hampshire was commended for its prevention work and volunteer engagement but told to improve recruitment planning, on-call cover, and mobilisation reliability.

County Durham earned an ‘outstanding’ grade for public protection through fire regulation and was praised for its AI-driven risk assessment approach but urged to progress equality and diversity efforts.

Lancashire achieved six ‘outstanding’ grades, excelling in understanding risk, multi-agency readiness, and organisational culture, though it was advised to strengthen its equality impact assessment process.

The findings showcase strong public protection measures across all three services, alongside clear opportunities for improvement.

They also reflect sector-wide themes, including the importance of data use, inclusive workforce planning, and operational readiness for both everyday incidents and large-scale emergencies.

NFPA and Alabama partner on fire protection and electrical inspection

Alabama joins NFPA affiliate chapter programme

The NFPA has announced that the Alabama Association of Electrical Inspectors has become the latest group to join its Electrical Inspection Section Affiliate Chapter (EIS) programme.

According to the NFPA, the chapter will serve as a key support body for electrical inspectors in Alabama, offering training, education, and opportunities to collaborate on safety issues.

The NFPA said the initiative is designed to support professionals responsible for enforcing electrical standards and requirements as set out in NFPA 70, the National Electrical Code.

The EIS programme aims to strengthen fire protection and life safety by helping state-level inspector groups engage with national standards, resources, and policy development.

This addition marks the sixth EIS Affiliate Chapter established in the United States since the programme began.

NFPA outlines aims for expanded collaboration

Tim McClintock, NFPA lead regional electrical specialist, said the organisation welcomed the Alabama Association of Electrical Inspectors as part of its growing network.

McClintock said: “NFPA is pleased to welcome its latest EIS Affiliate Chapter.”

He added: “Through this relationship, NFPA and the Alabama electrical enforcement community can unite efforts, using our collective voice to help address today’s current and emerging electrical challenges to advance safety in the community.

“We look forward to adding many other chapters in the future.”

He explained that the affiliate programme aims to support enforcement professionals while maintaining their independence from national code bodies.

McClintock continued: “A strong electrical inspection program plays a vital role in safety and compliance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code and other codes, helping safeguard people and property from electrical-related hazards.”

He added: “The new NFPA EIS Affiliate Chapter actively supports electrical inspection professionals who are charged with understanding the NEC and how its requirements are applied.

“It is aimed at both meeting their unique needs, as well as preserving the independent voices of those engaged in electrical inspections.”

U.S. expansion includes new regional roles

The Alabama Association of Electrical Inspectors joins five other state organisations that have launched EIS Affiliate Chapters.

These include inspector associations from Rhode Island, Kentucky, Colorado, North Carolina, and Ohio.

The NFPA noted that the chapters are part of a broader strategy to enhance national fire protection by supporting state and regional enforcement communities.

This expansion also includes the addition of two new regional electrical specialist positions within the NFPA to serve local communities more directly.

The organisation stated that these roles are intended to provide expert support, drive participation in code updates, and respond to region-specific challenges.

Chapter leader highlights compliance role

Blake Wilder, chair of the Alabama Association of Electrical Inspectors, said the partnership would help improve safety outcomes through effective enforcement and knowledge sharing.

Wilder said: “Electrical inspection is a key component to advancing safety in the community, ensuring compliance with the National Electrical Code and an effective electrical system of safety.”

He added: “The Alabama electrical inspection community is pleased to be working closely with NFPA to meet today’s electrical safety challenges head on.

“We hope to help expand our impact and position the chapter for the future.”

The NFPA said affiliate chapter membership supports professionals responsible for code compliance and enforcement in Alabama and nationwide.

It also stated that it encourages active collaboration on both the application and development of electrical safety regulations.

Affiliate benefits include specialist membership

According to the NFPA, individuals affiliated with an EIS chapter may be eligible for its Electrical Inspection Membership.

This membership includes participation in the broader NFPA Electrical Inspection Section.

Membership benefits include access to training on code changes, updates on safety issues, and involvement in the national code development process.

The organisation added that members also receive resources tailored to their roles in inspection and enforcement.

The NFPA said this structure is intended to create a more consistent national framework for electrical safety without reducing the autonomy of local inspectors.

It stated that the association remains committed to supporting professionals through practical resources, national standards, and industry events.

NFPA and Alabama partner on fire protection and electrical inspection: Summary

The National Fire Protection Association has confirmed the Alabama Association of Electrical Inspectors has joined its Electrical Inspection Section Affiliate Chapter programme.

The announcement was made by NFPA on 16 June 2025.

The affiliate chapter will support training and collaboration for electrical inspection professionals in Alabama.

Tim McClintock, NFPA lead regional electrical specialist, said the partnership would address current and emerging electrical challenges.

Blake Wilder, chair of the Alabama Association of Electrical Inspectors, said the group looked forward to working with NFPA.

The Alabama chapter joins five others in the U.S., including those in Rhode Island, Kentucky, Colorado, North Carolina, and Ohio.

The EIS programme is part of NFPA’s national strategy to improve electrical safety enforcement.

It includes new regional roles aimed at providing support to inspectors.

Affiliate chapter members may be eligible for special membership within NFPA.

Membership benefits include code training, event access, and participation in NFPA’s code development process.

HMICFRS assessments show strengths and gaps in Derbyshire and Devon and Somerset fire services

Inspection outcomes reveal progress and outstanding concerns

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has released inspection reports evaluating Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service and Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service.

HMICFRS rated Derbyshire ‘good’ in nine of 11 categories, while Devon and Somerset was rated ‘good’ in three.

Derbyshire received one ‘adequate’ rating and one ‘requires improvement’, while Devon and Somerset received three ‘adequate’ ratings and five ‘requires improvement’.

HMICFRS said Derbyshire had improved emergency response, risk planning and staff support measures.

Devon and Somerset was praised for financial oversight and firefighter availability but was advised to improve its prevention work and workforce inclusion.

Derbyshire’s response capabilities and workforce improvements recognised

HMICFRS reported that Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service was well-prepared to handle emergencies and multi-agency incidents.

The service was found to anticipate foreseeable risks, including floods, pandemics and terrorist events.

Its operational structure was aligned with these risks to support a flexible and responsive deployment model.

Inspectors said the service had acted on previous recommendations around equality and disciplinary procedures.

It had introduced staff training in equality, diversity and inclusion and revised its grievance process to improve effectiveness and well-being.

Devon and Somerset urged to improve prevention work

HMICFRS stated that Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service had not made enough progress on prevention since the last inspection.

The service was advised to implement consistent methods for prioritising home safety visits.

The inspectorate said five improvement areas from earlier inspections had not yet been resolved.

Despite this, Devon and Somerset was assessed as good in responding to emergencies and managing financial resources.

Its on-call firefighter availability remained consistently high, according to the inspection.

Equality, culture and development challenges persist

HMICFRS said both services must improve the way they manage leadership development and organisational culture.

Derbyshire lacked a talent management programme and needed fairer promotion procedures.

Devon and Somerset’s equality and inclusion team was described as understaffed, delaying improvements.

Inspectors found that some staff did not feel comfortable challenging inappropriate workplace behaviour.

The service was urged to evaluate whether its cultural interventions were having the intended impact.

Inspectors issue formal comments on inspection findings

His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services Lee Freeman said: “I am pleased with the performance of Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service in keeping people safe and secure from fire and other risks, but it needs to improve in some areas to provide a consistently good service.

“It has made progress since our 2022 inspection.

“The service is good at responding to emergencies and we were pleased with the efforts to maintain operational availability.

“It has also improved its workforce plan and brought in new measures to promote equality, diversity and inclusion.

“It has also recognised and addressed concerns we had heard about its disciplinary and grievance processes.

“But it should make sure its selection and promotion processes are fair, and do more to identify, support and develop future leaders.

“Overall, I commend the service on the changes it has already made, and I look forward to monitoring how it responds to address the areas for improvement we have identified.”

His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services Roy Wilsher said: “I am satisfied with some aspects of the performance of Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service in keeping people safe and secure from fire and other risks.

“But the service needs to improve in some areas.

“In particular, it needs to do more to prevent fires and other risks.

“We recognise that the service has experienced some changes in senior leadership roles.

“And I don’t underestimate the challenges in changing the culture, performance and efficiency of a fire and rescue service.

“But we were disappointed to find that the service hasn’t made the progress we expected.

“For example, five areas for improvement that we highlighted during our previous inspections of the service still haven’t been addressed.

“Overall, there is a clear commitment from staff and senior leaders to improve.

“The service is aware of the many issues we found and had plans in place to make improvements.

“I will keep in close contact with the service to monitor its progress in addressing the remaining cause of concern and associated recommendations.”

HMICFRS assessments show strengths and gaps in Derbyshire and Devon and Somerset fire services: Summary

HMICFRS has released two inspection reports evaluating Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service and Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service.

Derbyshire was rated ‘good’ in nine of 11 categories.

It was also rated ‘adequate’ in one area and ‘requires improvement’ in another.

Devon and Somerset was rated ‘good’ in three categories.

It received three ‘adequate’ ratings and five ‘requires improvement’ ratings.

HMICFRS praised Derbyshire for emergency response, equality training and risk planning.

The inspectorate said Devon and Somerset had strong financial oversight and on-call firefighter availability.

Devon and Somerset was advised to improve its fire prevention priorities.

Both services were told to improve workforce development and leadership pathways.

Cultural and inclusion-related concerns were raised in both reports.

HMICFRS included statements from Inspectors Lee Freeman and Roy Wilsher.

Both services were reported as having plans to address the remaining areas for improvement.

Fire and rescue services inspection programme 2025–27: How HMICFRS will assess performance

HMICFRS outlines framework for evaluating fire and rescue services

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has confirmed the inspection approach it will use to evaluate fire and rescue services in England between 2025 and 2027.

According to HMICFRS, the fire and rescue services inspection programme 2025–27 will assess each service against defined characteristics of good performance.

These characteristics are designed to support consistency across all services and to clarify how judgements about effectiveness, efficiency and people management will be made.

The inspectorate stated that while these characteristics are informed by national standards, operational guidance and research evidence, they are not intended to constitute definitive benchmarks.

HMICFRS noted it retains the discretion to determine its own measures of performance in assessing services.

Fire and rescue effectiveness to be evaluated in five key areas

HMICFRS explained that its effectiveness assessment will examine how well each fire and rescue service understands and manages risk, prevents incidents, protects the public, responds to emergencies, and works with other agencies during major incidents.

The inspectorate said each service’s Community Risk Management Plan (CRMP) will be reviewed to determine whether risks are accurately identified and mitigated through appropriate resource allocation, governance and accountability.

In terms of prevention, HMICFRS stated that it expects services to have strategies aligned with local risks, statutory requirements and accessible communication for diverse communities.

Services must also show evidence of safeguarding vulnerable individuals and evaluating the impact of their prevention efforts.

Regulatory activity and emergency response will also be assessed

HMICFRS outlined that services will be judged on how effectively they protect the public through fire safety regulation.

This includes implementing fire safety enforcement strategies, conducting audits and using enforcement powers where necessary.

Regarding emergency response, HMICFRS said it will assess services’ alignment with national operational guidance, the appropriateness of response strategies, and how information is gathered and shared.

The inspectorate also said it will consider how services use learning from past incidents to improve future performance.

Services will also be evaluated on their readiness to manage major and multi-agency incidents, with specific attention to planning, exercising joint capabilities, and applying national coordination frameworks.

Efficiency, workforce management and leadership included in inspections

According to HMICFRS, the efficiency assessment will consider how each service uses resources to deliver value for money and manage risk.

This includes financial planning, performance management, and how services exploit opportunities to improve efficiency through estate, fleet and technology decisions.

Inspections will also evaluate how well fire and rescue services support their workforce. HMICFRS said it will look at organisational culture, staff development, training, inclusion, and leadership.

It added that services must demonstrate that they are promoting ethical conduct, supporting staff well-being and ensuring fairness in recruitment and progression.

The inspectorate confirmed that the inspection framework aims to determine whether services have the capacity and capability to deliver sustainable improvement and public service.

Fire and rescue services inspection programme 2025–27: Summary

HMICFRS has released details of how it will inspect fire and rescue services in England from 2025 to 2027.

The inspections will use characteristics of good performance to assess effectiveness, efficiency and people management.

These characteristics are not binding standards but help ensure consistent evaluation across services.

Effectiveness assessments will focus on risk management, prevention, fire safety regulation, emergency response and major incident preparedness.

Efficiency assessments will look at governance, financial management, resource allocation and value for money.

People assessments will consider workforce culture, training, diversity, inclusion and leadership at all levels.

All inspection criteria are linked to services’ Community Risk Management Plans.

HMICFRS retains discretion to apply its own judgment when evaluating service performance.

The inspection programme draws on national standards, operational guidance and research evidence.

Performance findings will inform improvement and accountability across fire and rescue services in England.

HMICFRS reports on Royal Berkshire, Leicestershire and Cleveland fire and rescue services

Update notice for existing article: This article was updated to include the latest inspection findings for Cleveland Fire Brigade.

HMICFRS outlines performance strengths and improvement areas for three English fire services

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has published inspection findings for Royal Berkshire and Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Services.

The two services were assessed under the 2023–2025 inspection cycle.

Each was graded across 11 categories relating to effectiveness, efficiency and workforce management.

Both services were found to be providing core functions to the public, but HMICFRS identified areas requiring further attention, including leadership oversight, staff support processes and the allocation of resources.

Royal Berkshire rated ‘good’ overall with recommendation to improve resource planning

Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service received ‘good’ ratings in eight categories and ‘adequate’ in three.

Inspectors noted the service works effectively with other agencies and continues to deliver its prevention, protection and response responsibilities.

However, HMICFRS said the service should better explain how it allocates resources across these functions, ensuring alignment with the priorities outlined in its community risk management plan.

The report acknowledged improvements in estate transformation, technology use and workforce productivity.

Staff were described as empowered and willing to challenge inappropriate behaviours, with some having completed active bystander training.

HMICFRS also advised the service to develop a fair process to support aspiring leaders.

Roy Wilsher, His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services, said: “It is providing a good service to the public, and it is particularly effective in preventing fires and responding to incidents.”

He added: “It needs to review whether it is allocating the right resources to its prevention, protection and response functions to provide the best service to the public.”

Leicestershire sees operational progress but faces leadership and wellbeing concerns

Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service was graded ‘good’ in six areas, ‘adequate’ in one and ‘requires improvement’ in four.

The service was commended for improvements in incident response and the use of a performance dashboard linked to its community risk management plan.

HMICFRS identified its road safety intervention programme with the Youth and Justice Service as innovative practice.

Despite these strengths, the report raised concerns about leadership behaviour and staff confidence in internal reporting systems.

Some staff reported a fear of reprisals when raising issues, and a high proportion of support staff absences were attributed to stress, mental health challenges and workload pressures.

Equality, diversity and inclusion were also highlighted as requiring more senior leadership commitment and visibility.

Lee Freeman, His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services, said: “There are areas in which the service still needs to improve.”

He added: “I am disappointed to see that, since our 2022 inspection, the service hasn’t made the overall progress we expected.”

Cleveland Fire Brigade praised for progress but advised to strengthen training and culture alignment

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has also published its inspection findings for Cleveland Fire Brigade as part of the 2023–2025 inspection programme.

The service was assessed across 11 areas, with the report highlighting both improvements since the previous inspection and areas requiring further attention.

Inspectors noted that Cleveland Fire Brigade has made progress in how it monitors and evaluates the impact of collaborative activity.

HMICFRS found that senior leaders actively encourage feedback from across the workforce, with evidence of regular engagement through staff forums, network groups and reporting systems.

However, the report also identified several areas in need of improvement.

These include ensuring all staff are appropriately trained for their roles and improving the accuracy of risk information used by operational staff and fire control.

The inspection found that debriefs after incidents were not always completed according to policy, which limited learning opportunities.

Additionally, concerns were raised about inconsistencies between the organisation’s stated values and some of the behaviours observed or reported within the workforce.

The report stated that while there is a strong commitment to improvement across the service, cultural alignment and leadership behaviour remain areas requiring attention.

His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services said: “I am satisfied with some aspects of the performance of Cleveland Fire Brigade in keeping people safe and secure from fire and other risks, but there are areas in which the brigade needs to improve.”

HMICFRS reports on Royal Berkshire, Leicestershire and Cleveland fire and rescue services: Summary

HMICFRS has released inspection reports for Royal Berkshire, Leicestershire and Cleveland Fire and Rescue Services.

Royal Berkshire was rated ‘good’ in eight areas and ‘adequate’ in three.

The service continues to deliver prevention and response functions but was advised to improve how it allocates resources in line with its risk management plan.

Leicestershire was graded ‘good’ in six areas, ‘adequate’ in one and ‘requires improvement’ in four.

While operational improvements were noted, the service was advised to address leadership behaviour, internal reporting processes and staff wellbeing.

Cleveland was found to have made progress since its last inspection, particularly in monitoring collaborative work and encouraging workforce feedback.

However, inspectors said that improvements are needed in training, the accuracy of risk information and consistency in leadership behaviour and organisational culture.

HMICFRS said all three services must focus on leadership engagement, staff development and aligning resources to identified risks.