The fire service’s greatest health risk: PGI Safety’s case for treating cancer as operational risk

Andy Slater, Managing Director for EMEA and Asia Pacific at PGI Safety, outlines exposure routes and daily hygiene steps for operational crews

Firefighter cancer risk has shifted from emerging concern to operational reality, driven by clinical evidence, national mortality data and lived experience across the service.

While awareness has grown, many brigades still struggle to convert research into everyday practice that reduces exposure, improves early detection and embeds long-term behaviour change.

Education, practical intervention and credible collaboration have therefore become central to closing that gap.

Andy Slater, Managing Director for EMEA and Asia Pacific at PGI Safety, has focused on translating evidence into frontline action through education, PPE development and shared ownership.

Drawing on sustained engagement with firefighters, clinicians and industry peers, Andy has helped shape initiatives aimed at cancer prevention, early screening and cultural change.

IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey spoke with Andy about how education, culture and practical solutions can improve firefighter health outcomes.

You have described cancer as the most serious health threat facing the fire service today. What evidence and lived experience led you to that view?

Cancer is now recognised as the leading cause of line-of-duty deaths among firefighters, surpassing acute incidents like fires or structural collapse.

In the UK, studies show firefighters face significantly higher mortality from certain cancers, with prostate cancer up to 3.8 times higher, leukaemia 3.17 times and oesophageal 2.42 times than the general population, and overall cancer mortality 1.6 times higher.

Internationally, organisations such as the IAFF report that occupational cancer accounts for around 70 to 80 percent of line-of-duty deaths in recent years.

Lived experience reinforces this: I have heard from firefighters diagnosed after years of service, often linking symptoms to repeated exposure.

Collaborations with advocates like John Lord, who survived cancer and now champions awareness through seminars, and Robbie Burns, whose personal testimony has moved entire rooms, have shared stories of colleagues affected young or posthumously.

The WHO’s IARC reclassified occupational firefighting as carcinogenic to humans in 2022, and UK surveys showing elevated diagnoses, including in younger age groups, confirm this is a real and ongoing epidemic we can address through better protection and practices.

How do firefighters encounter carcinogenic exposure, and where can daily practice reduce risk most effectively?

Firefighters encounter carcinogens primarily through inhalation of smoke and particulates, dermal absorption via skin contact with soot and toxins, especially on the neck, groin and wrists, and ingestion from hand-to-mouth transfer or contaminated gear.

Modern fires increasingly involve plastics and synthetics that release toxic chemicals such as PAHs, benzene and PFAS, which linger on PPE, appliances and within stations.

The greatest opportunities lie in consistent day-to-day decontamination protocols: immediate post-incident hygiene, showering within the hour, on-site laundering, particulate-blocking hoods to reduce neck exposure, separating clean and dirty zones in stations and appliances, and avoiding eating or storing gear in contaminated areas.

Simple changes, such as not taking PPE home and adopting breathable barrier fabrics, can dramatically cut absorption.

At PGI, we focus on gear that balances protection with comfort to encourage consistent use, turning these practices into routine habits that save lives over the long term.

How have your education and knowledge-sharing initiatives evolved in practice?

Education started with raising basic awareness of contaminants and has developed into targeted, evidence-based seminars such as the Invisible Risk series.

Early sessions focused heavily on the “why”, including exposures and statistics, but feedback showed firefighters needed the “how”: practical decontamination steps, PPE selection guidance and station culture changes.

We refined the approach by incorporating real firefighter stories, scientific input from toxicology experts, interactive gear demonstrations and emphatic presentations by Robbie Burns.

Collaborations with peers such as John Lord and Robbie have broadened reach, attracting hundreds from fire services, regulators and suppliers.

What works best are actionable takeaways, such as clear post-incident hygiene protocols, combined with peer-led discussions that build buy-in.

Post-seminar engagement has been strong, with firefighters sharing stories of changed behaviours, deeper understanding of PPE requirements and proactive steps such as pursuing SNOMED codes.

Departments have adopted better practices that reduce cross-contamination and encourage earlier health checks.

How can SNOMED codes improve screening and earlier clinical intervention for firefighters?

SNOMED CT codes allow GPs and NHS systems to record a patient’s occupation as firefighter, using code 106382009, and occupational exposure risks, such as 16090571000119109.

This flags elevated cancer risk in electronic records and prompts clinicians to consider occupational factors during consultations.

In practice, this enables targeted screening, including earlier PSA testing, faster referrals for symptoms that might otherwise be dismissed and inclusion in enhanced monitoring.

After promoting SNOMED codes through seminars, several firefighters secured rapid PSA checks, leading to early-stage diagnoses in some unfortunate cases.

Catching cancer very early delivers far better outcomes.

We urge firefighters to request that their GP adds these codes.

It is a simple administrative step with significant impact, as better data leads directly to earlier intervention and improved outcomes.

How do mental and behavioural health challenges interact with cancer risk and long-term outcomes?

PTSD, shift-work stress and burnout are prevalent within the fire service and interact strongly with physical risks.

Chronic stress weakens the immune system, potentially accelerating disease progression, while behaviours such as poor sleep, smoking, alcohol use or skipping health checks compound exposure effects.

Stress can also lead to complacency in decontamination, with firefighters rushing post-incident routines or failing to change contaminated gear properly.

Over time, this creates a cycle where poorer mental health worsens physical outcomes and cancer diagnoses add psychological burden.

Addressing mental and physical wellbeing together helps reduce overall risk, as healthier firefighters are more vigilant about exposure and early detection.

Why do you view inclusion, particularly for women, as a practical safety issue?

Inclusion is a safety imperative.

Women firefighters face risks linked to ill-fitting PPE designed for male builds, which can increase exposure through gaps, and research suggests higher risks for certain cancers, including bladder.

Hormonal factors and reproductive health considerations add further complexity.

This focus also widens to other blue light responders, particularly police and ambulance staff working fire scenes, where correct PPE and RPE fit is critical.

Exclusionary cultures deter reporting concerns or seeking help, delaying interventions.

By prioritising inclusive gear, diverse voices in training and addressing gender-specific risks in seminars, protection improves for all.

I have been fortunate to have individuals such as Dany Cotton and Michelle O’Toole contributing to this important conversation around women’s health and inclusion within the fire service.

How have peers such as John Lord and Robbie Burns shaped this work?

Collaboration underpins credibility.

John Lord, a retired station manager and cancer survivor, has been pivotal through his Invisible Risk seminars and advocacy, including promoting SNOMED codes.

His work has driven personal action, early diagnoses among attendees and wider engagement, including with retired firefighters and international audiences.

Robbie Burns, a serving watch manager, shares his personal bladder cancer journey through powerful, emphatic presentations at PGI seminars.

His testimony brings urgency and authenticity, inspiring immediate behaviour change.

Feedback consistently highlights improved daily practices, better PPE choices and proactive health steps.

Together with PGI’s technical solutions and support from industry colleagues, this peer-driven approach builds trust and motivates adoption across services.

My personal and sincere thanks also go to Mick O’Briand and Chris Thornton from Biggin Hill Airport for their tireless support.

What should the wider sector learn about improving firefighter health outcomes?

Change happens through shared ownership across firefighters, unions, manufacturers, researchers and regulators.

Education must be evidence-based, drawing on UK studies, IARC classifications and real operational data, while being delivered accessibly with practical tools and lived experience.

Sustained investment is needed in prevention, including improved PPE standards, mandatory decontamination protocols, universal SNOMED use and routine health surveillance.

Engagement following our seminars has led to behaviour change, heightened awareness of PPE and health needs, rapid PSA checks and early-stage cancer detections.

Shared ownership ensures no one waits for top-down mandates.

By combining data, lived experience and practical solutions, the sector can build lasting momentum and treat cancer as an operational risk that demands proactive, collective action.

This was originally published in the February 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

PGI Safety discuss protective gear with a purpose 

PGI Safety Managing Director Andy Slater outlines changing protection needs, international expansion, particulate research and the impact of firefighter-driven feedback  

Firefighters face daily exposure to harmful particulates, with long-term health consequences now better understood and harder to ignore.

Protective equipment has had to adapt, with greater attention placed on how garments balance safety, comfort and durability. 

PGI Safety, a technical garment manufacturer with roots dating back to the 1940s, has positioned itself at the centre of this shift.

The company combines certified protective clothing with education initiatives, giving fire and rescue services the evidence and practical knowledge they need to make informed choices. 

Leading the effort is Andy Slater, Managing Director across the UK, Europe and Asia Pacific.

With two decades’ experience in safety equipment – and a personal motivation through his firefighter son – he is guiding PGI’s expansion and focus on solutions that respond directly to frontline concerns.

IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey sat down with Andy to discuss the changing demands in firefighter protection and what’s next. 

When meeting firefighters or procurement teams, what key concerns do they raise about required on-the-job protection? 

The key concern now is that protection is essential. If you go back a few years, there wasn’t so much scepticism as a need for proof and more detailed studies.

That evidence is now available – through the work of organisations like the FBU, Hertfordshire University and from statistics alone. 

The challenge for firefighters and procurement teams is navigating the pitfalls. Sadly, as has been publicised, it’s not just about protecting against particulates.

They also need breathability and comfort. It’s about understanding the testing, the standards and what good really looks like. 

For example, some manufacturers claim NFPA certification when they don’t actually have it.

There is no specific EN standard for particulate hoods – NFPA is the only global benchmark and it is very difficult and expensive to achieve. We pride ourselves on meeting both NFPA and EN Certification. 

Andy Slater

So from the customer’s perspective, the question is: what does good look like and why is your product as good as you claim it is? For us, the answer is proof.

That means hard data, recognised certification, and real-world results from wearer trials.

It’s not just about making claims—it’s about giving customers the tools to understand exactly what performance clothing can and should do, and guiding them through the data so they can make sense of it with confidence. 

With increasing awareness of long-term health risks from exposure, how is PGI addressing this growing challenge? 

When I joined PGI, it was clear there was an education gap. Some authorities understood the research, others knew far less.

We started with a small knowledge-sharing session involving people like Robbie Burns and John Lord and that grew into our particulate and decontamination seminars. 

The first was at Biggin Hill Airport. We combined science, current evidence and practical solutions – not just products, but behavioural changes like showering within the hour and proper handwashing.

We also showed participants how to check standards, labels and certificates. 

The seminars have been good for us and for the wider community. Authorities have even brought projects forward after attending.

The science and data matter, but the personal stories are what really resonate. PGI has invested heavily in particulate protection, with millions spent on R&D.

Andy Slater

Our Barrier Gold hood is now our biggest seller worldwide and we continue to improve it. 

What are the main focus areas for your future seminars and how are you planning the next one? 

We always try to introduce new subjects, but our top priority is keeping the message alive – PSA tests, SNOMED codes and raising awareness.

At the same time, we focus on educating people about available solutions. The challenge is convincing authorities to allocate budgets.

We get strong feedback and sometimes projects move forward, but momentum can fade once people return to daily work. That’s why we keep updating the data, which changes quickly. 

Andy Slater

We also work to keep seminars fresh. Much of the message is the same, because cancer is cancer, but we adapt the focus and stay close to universities, professionals and influential voices like Robbie Burns and John Lord, who connect directly with audiences.

The next seminar is planned for February or March, though dates aren’t finalised.  

How do you ensure industry feedback and experience directly shape the development or updating of products? 

The seminars are interactive, usually around 100 people and we learn as much as we share. Ideas raised there feed back into our R&D, guiding product development.

Simple measures like snoods and base layers can reduce exposure significantly. Cross-contamination is also a big issue – in the past, firefighters took kit home to wash and families were exposed. 

Everything we do is tested against standards and practicality. If it has to be washed a hundred times, it needs to stand up to that.

Andy Slater

These discussions help us refine fabrics, products and approaches, ensuring solutions are practical and effective. 

Crews often highlight comfort and mobility – how do you balance these needs with garment performance standards? 

Although we have a facility in the UK, our main production is in the US, so everything we make meets NFPA standards as a minimum. 

Take hoods as an example. They must filter particulates but also remain breathable. Heat stress is the second biggest killer of firefighters.

Early products blocked contaminants but overheated users, like wearing a plastic bag.

Standards now require breathability, moisture management, flame resistance and durability through repeated laundering. 

Andy Slater

Needs differ. Instructors face high exposure and may accept less breathability for greater protection. For them we developed a laminate version of our Nanoflex based Hoods.

The standard achieves 97–98% efficiency, while the laminate reaches 99.9%. Whilst it is marginally less breathable but ideal for controlled training environments. 

Which areas of innovation are you focused on and how might fire service needs change? 

We are constantly developing, but hoods remain a priority because they are one of the simplest changes an authority can make.

Firefighters already wear them for heat and flame protection, so swapping to a hood with a protective membrane is an easy upgrade.

It is equally comfortable and breathable but now adds particulate protection. 

Some authorities are further ahead than others. Often that comes down to budgets and resources rather than a lack of awareness. For those who adopt them, it is a quick, straightforward improvement. 

This was originally published in the October 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.