Collaboration enhances fire safety in UK’s Queens Drive housing development

by ConstructionFeatured NewsProjects

Passive fire safety focus in Swindon housing scheme

Quelfire has reported its involvement in the Queens Drive regeneration project in Swindon, which has delivered 149 affordable homes.

The £36 million project, led by Swindon Borough Council, aimed to address the town’s social housing needs while incorporating sustainable and safety-led design elements.

A key example of collaboration

The Queens Drive regeneration project has been a welcomed initiative of Swindon Borough Council.

Addressing the town’s social housing needs, this project has created 149 affordable homes that will act as a gateway to the town, providing a more welcoming drive into the town centre.

This £36 million project has been designed to reflect Swindon’s railway heritage.

The houses have solar panels, triple-glazed windows, dozens of bird boxes, and trees planted to encourage wildlife growth.

The LABC (Local Authority Building Control) recognised Queens Drive in the National Building Excellence Awards as the best large social housing development.

As the chosen passive fire protection system manufacturer, Quelfire worked alongside Willmott Dixon and Fire Shield to deliver this project.

The main objective was to design and build the homes around the tested details available, creating a safe community for residents to reside in.

During this project, what was the main challenge?

Queens Drive’s main challenge was utilising service penetration types that had limited industry-wide testing, such as electrical socket boxes in conjunction with the innovative Beadmaster product.

What solutions did quelfire reach to resolve any issues?

The key to Queens Drive’s smooth completion was the involvement of the Willmott Dixon design team, which proactively designed and planned the build, ensuring service penetration sealing was a priority.

Acknowledging that early engagement has been crucial in past projects, Willmott Dixon and Fire Shield initiated this approach right from the early stages.

This ensured that Quelfire addressed any service penetration sealing concerns during the design process, guaranteeing that relevant, tested solutions were identified, and grey areas were avoided.

Because of the time Quelfire gained from the early collaboration, in the case of no tested solutions for electrical socket boxes with Beadmaster, they were able to add this to their testing programme upon request from Willmott Dixon.

Because of this scenario-specific testing, Quelfire were able to provide Queens Drive and the wider industry with primary test evidence, as opposed to an engineered judgement.

What kind of success did the client enjoy with quelfire’s services/products?

Queens Drive is proof of the success collaboration and communication between all stakeholders can bring.

Through Quelfire’s early engagement and shared commitment to the project’s success, the project was able to reach a robust and compliant design, resulting in minimal issues and rework during the build stage and, ultimately, no extra costs.

The approach of those involved in the project not only streamlined its progress but also demonstrated their adherence to industry regulations, making each party a vital part of this success story.

Robert England, Senior Project Manager at Fire Shield, said: “Quelfire has been an ally to Fire Shield for many years, specifically myself, regarding the enormous support we receive.

“We appreciate this ongoing support from the training, CPDs, and videos Quelfire offers to ensure we can find suitable answers from project to project. Queens Drive is a testament to this.”

Building control approval for higher-risk buildings: Guidance from the Building Safety Regulator

by Breaking NewsConstructionSafety

Application process applies to high-rise residential, care and hospital buildings in England

The UK Health and Safety Executive has published updated guidance detailing how to apply for building control approval from the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) for work involving higher-risk buildings in England.

Higher-risk buildings are defined as those that are at least 18 metres tall or have seven or more storeys, and either contain at least two residential units or are used as hospitals or care homes.

The guidance outlines when approval is required, how to apply, and the obligations of clients during building projects.

It also explains the classification of building work, exemptions, emergency procedures, and what happens after an application is submitted.

According to the Health and Safety Executive, building work on higher-risk buildings must not begin until building control approval has been granted.

Failing to obtain approval beforehand is a criminal offence.

Clients must ensure applications are accurate and submitted before work begins

Under the regulations, it is the client’s legal responsibility to make sure that an application for building control approval is submitted and approved before any work on a higher-risk building starts.

Clients may nominate someone else to handle the submission process, but responsibility for compliance remains with the client.

Building control approval is required for new higher-risk buildings, work that results in a building becoming or ceasing to be higher-risk, and most work on existing higher-risk buildings unless it is classified as exempt or conducted under a recognised competent person scheme.

Approval is not needed for non-higher-risk buildings.

In such cases, control remains with local authorities or registered building control approvers.

Applications vary based on project scope and must follow defined categories

The process for applying differs depending on whether the project involves a new higher-risk building or work on an existing one.

For new construction, applicants can choose to submit one full application or apply in stages if the project is complex.

In all cases, a single application should be submitted for connected buildings that share common parts such as car parks or walls.

Work on existing higher-risk buildings must be categorised correctly.

Category A includes structural alterations and changes affecting fire safety systems or escape routes.

Category B includes all other work.

Applications submitted under the wrong category may be rejected.

Emergency repairs addressing immediate health or safety risks can be undertaken without prior approval, but BSR must be notified by the end of the next working day.

Approval, inspections, and completion certification processes

Once an application is submitted, the BSR checks that it includes all necessary information.

Applications that pass validation are assessed within 12 weeks for new buildings or 8 weeks for existing buildings, unless otherwise agreed.

Decisions may include approval, conditional approval with further requirements, or rejection.

If rejected, the applicant will receive reasons and can request a review or appeal to a First-tier Tribunal.

After approval, clients must notify the BSR at various stages of the project and comply with a defined inspection schedule.

Any major changes to the project must be submitted for additional approval.

When construction is complete, clients must apply for a completion certificate.

A building with two or more residential units must also be registered with BSR before it can be occupied.

Building control approval for higher-risk buildings: Summary

The Building Safety Regulator, part of the UK Health and Safety Executive, requires building control approval for construction or building work on higher-risk buildings in England.

These buildings are defined as those with at least 18 metres in height or seven storeys, and either containing two or more residential units, or operating as hospitals or care homes.

Clients are legally responsible for ensuring that building control approval is granted before any work starts.

Applications must follow specific processes depending on whether the building is new or existing, and must be categorised appropriately.

Emergency repairs are allowed without prior approval but must be reported to BSR the next working day.

Applications are validated and assessed by BSR, who will issue a decision to approve, approve with requirements, or reject.

Approved projects must follow inspection and change notification protocols.

Upon completion, a certificate must be obtained, and buildings with residential units must be registered with BSR before occupation.

Charges apply according to the BSR’s published scheme.

Building smarter with BIM technology, Microsol Resources discuss

by Breaking NewsConstruction

Daniel Drohan, Account Executive, Microsol Resources, examines how BIM enhances fire safety by improving risk detection, system integration and emergency planning across construction projects 

Fire safety systems integration in building design has always been paramount in the construction process. In the past, fire prevention strategies, such as fire-resistant materials, escape routes and suppression systems, were designed and installed manually.

Building Information Modelling (BIM) has ushered fire safety design approaches to the next level, providing unparalleled advantages in risk assessment, visualisation, regulatory compliance and emergency response strategies. 

This article explores how BIM is changing how we perform fire safety in construction projects. It serves as a one-source reference for professionals, emergency services personnel, industry regulators and decision-makers concerned with fire prevention, safety systems and emergency management. 

How BIM assesses risk and fire prevention

One of BIM’s greatest contributions to fire safety is its ability to maximise construction site safety by assisting in risk assessment in the early design stages. BIM can help designers and safety engineers develop proper fire safety plans and design and simulate what could go wrong before construction occurs.  

Here is how BIM revolutionises risk assessments and fire prevention: 

It analyses and identifies hazards early. BIM offers a holistic approach to fire risk assessment based on data from different sources and building systems (architectural, structural, MEP, etc.). For instance, BIM may detect a badly positioned fire exit or inadequate fire protection systems. 

Ideally, early identification of hazards is essential and design modifications early in the process can facilitate effective improvement to fire safety while avoiding the expensive remedy of retrofitting after construction. 

BIM simulates fire scenarios: Using BIM models, you can simulate the fire dynamics and see how that fire would move through different building sections. This is heat flux analysis, smoke movement analysis and effectiveness analysis of ventilation systems. These simulations are used to design fire barriers, exit routes and fire suppression systems suitable to each building’s needs. 

Fire safety system integration: BIM integrates various fire safety systems into the building’s design, such as sprinklers, alarms and fire-resistant doors. This permits the detection of design conflicts between systems and eliminates design errors that may compromise the building’s fire performance and safety. 

How does the BIM transform the visualisation of fire safety?

Fire safety design has traditionally been and continues to be a highly visual activity. BIM moves this up to a new level by providing a dynamic, interactive platform for visualising fire safety elements and strategies during the building process.  

So, how does BIM transform fire safety visualisation? Let’s get into it in detail. 

Real-time updates and modifications 

BIM differs from a traditional CAD model because it allows real-time updates. If the building design changes, fire safety professionals can quickly determine its effect on fire risk and fire safety systems. For instance, a modification in the building layout may move the fire exit or change the materials used. BIM can instantly assess the changes, meaning the fire safety measures are always current. 

Interactive and immersive visualisation 

BIM allows users to walk through a building virtually, providing an immersive experience that will enable them to see potential fire hazards from both the design team’s perspective and the emergency responders. This is just one level of visualisation that’s very useful when designing emergency evacuation routes and understanding how occupants react during a fire situation. 

Simplifying regulatory compliance with BIM in fire safety 

BIM simplifies building codes and fire safety regulations by automating the work. A BIM model allows architects and engineers to easily check that fire safety codes are being satisfied—for example, fire resistance ratings, escape route widths and where fire alarms and extinguishers should go. It simplifies the process of checking that regulatory requirements are met before approval. 

With BIM, there’s less risk of noncompliance and less chance of costly delays, fines, or hazardous situations. BIM constantly monitors the design against fire safety standards, so the designers and stakeholders have no worries that fire safety measures are not integrated and maintained. 

How BIM models enhance emergency response strategies

The BIM models enable emergency responders to assess and control fires more effectively and faster. They have full access to relevant building information, including fire exits, safety systems and occupancy loads. Many first responders also believe that real-time building data enhances emergency response results. 

Another benefit of BIM is planning training on building configurations and risks in case of fire disasters, which helps enhance compliance and quick decision-making. 

BIM also enables representation of fire cases, which in turn allows firefighters to determine how to proceed when a fire occurs. This need is met through the approach, which offers the best chance at maximising the safety of the building while ensuring the safety of the first responders and the occupants, even in emergencies. 

 How digital twins and BIM are leading the way

The future of fire safety is in the hands of Digital Twins (DTs) and Building Information Modelling (BIM). Both will place fire safety on a more intelligent and proactive path with intelligent safety management—a real-time digital twin of a physical building whose power comes from BIM data and sensors. 

As fire alarm and sprinkler critical systems, this technology allows continuous monitoring and when malfunctions are detected, it alerts the user immediately.

New research conducted in a recent survey shows that 75 percent of respondents believe that digital twins can aid fire safety equipment maintenance, demonstrating the growing faith in digital twins to upgrade safety procedures. 

In addition, digital twins with BIM and IoT contribute to 3D models combined with real-time data to evaluate fire safety and better plan evacuations. In the same survey mentioned above, 89% of respondents favor this approach; they see the opportunity to increase the performance of fire safety equipment and simplify emergency procedures.  

The promise of being a system interconnected with the entire potential building operation will revolutionise fire safety. This will ensure timely interventions and enhance risk management at all stages of building operation. 

Final thought

Integrating BIM into fire safety design is the most significant change in the construction industry. BIM benefits fire safety by improving risk detection, fire prevention, building compliance and emergency response. Like any new technology, such as digital twins, the possibilities for BIM to change how fire safety design is carried out are growing.  

This model has become a critical innovation for those working on construction, emergency services and regulatory authorities. It has become a central part of the modern practice of fire safety as a means of better visualisation, simulation and automation of fire safety systems. 

About the author 

Daniel Drohan is the Account Executive for the New England market for Microsol Resources. He supports architecture, engineering and construction firms that focus on the latest solutions to help improve collaboration and data collection and maximise ROI for any project. Dan has a BS in Marketing and a Minor in Sustainability from UMass Dartmouth. He lives in the Boston area with his wife and his three kids who enjoy sports and the outdoors. 

This article was originally published in the March 2025 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal – to read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Government urged to address skills shortages delaying cladding remediation

by Breaking NewsConstructionPassiveSafety

PAC report highlights UK cladding remediation delays

A new report by the Public Accounts Committee has identified ongoing delays and challenges in the UK’s response to the cladding crisis.

According to the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC), the findings reflect key issues already raised in its recent remediation industry white paper.

NFCC Chair Mark Hardingham said the report confirmed that efforts to fix unsafe buildings continue to be obstructed by major barriers beyond funding alone:

Hardingham said: “Today’s report exposes both the extent of the cladding crisis and the considerable gaps that lie between the remediation action plan and its realisation.”

Fire services say capacity is limiting inspections

The NFCC has reiterated that fire and rescue services are under-resourced to meet the scale of inspection work needed for mid-rise residential buildings.

Hardingham said: “Fire and rescue services have been at the forefront of the response to remediate unsafe buildings, but as we continue to point out, lack the capacity and workforce needed to identify and inspect all mid-rise residential buildings.”

He also pointed to wider labour issues in construction as another contributing factor: “We are also seeing delays to remediation compounded further by skills shortages in the construction sector.”

Enforcement alone will not solve compliance issues

The NFCC cautioned that enforcement strategies cannot resolve the crisis without support for those required to act.

Hardingham said: “Whilst the Committee is justified in putting a spotlight on the important role of enforcement, this must be considered against the fact that many responsible building owners lack the means to comply due to complex ownership structures, or a shortage of skilled professionals to do the job.”

He added: “Put simply – we cannot enforce our way out of the cladding crisis.”

NFCC calls for national skills and remediation strategy

The NFCC is urging the UK Government to lead a centralised remediation effort backed by a national skills strategy.

Hardingham said: “NFCC is calling for a centrally coordinated Government led programme to address barriers to remediating unsafe residential buildings, with a cross-departmental Construction Skills Strategy needed to address chronic shortages in fire engineers, risk assessors, and other key professionals.”

He said a long-term approach is needed to ensure people are not left in unsafe housing indefinitely: “Today’s report underpins the importance of getting those essential foundations in place so that we are not leaving thousands of people living in unsafe buildings for many more years to come.”

Government urged to address skills shortages delaying cladding remediation: Summary

The National Fire Chiefs Council has responded to a new report by the Public Accounts Committee on cladding remediation in the UK.

NFCC Chair Mark Hardingham said the report confirms barriers already raised by the organisation in its white paper, including limited workforce capacity and skills shortages across the fire safety and construction sectors.

He said fire and rescue services do not have the resources to inspect all mid-rise residential buildings.

The NFCC said enforcement alone will not resolve compliance delays, as many responsible building owners are unable to act due to complex legal structures and labour shortfalls.

The NFCC is calling for a Government-led national remediation programme.

It is also proposing a cross-departmental Construction Skills Strategy to address shortages in fire engineers, risk assessors and other professionals.

Grenfell Inquiry response: Government announces reforms, industry calls for action

by Breaking NewsBuilding ManagementConstructionSafety

Government pledges regulatory overhaul following Grenfell Inquiry findings

The UK government has committed to enacting all 58 recommendations from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report, published on 26 February 2025.

The response introduces stricter construction product safety regulations, enhanced protections for social housing tenants, and a new single construction regulator. Seven organisations named in the inquiry report will also be investigated under new procurement laws, which could lead to them being banned from public contracts.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said: “The Grenfell Tower tragedy claimed 72 innocent lives in a disaster that should never have happened. The final report exposed in stark and devastating detail the shocking industry behaviour and wider failures that led to the fire.”

Stronger regulations for construction and fire safety

The government has outlined a series of reforms to address failings identified in the inquiry, including:

  • The creation of a single construction regulator to oversee compliance and accountability in building safety.
  • New rules for construction products, ensuring stricter oversight of manufacturers and certification bodies.
  • The introduction of a Hillsborough Law, imposing a legal duty on public authorities to disclose the truth in major incidents.
  • Greater legal protections for residents, obliging landlords to act on safety concerns and ensuring social housing tenants can challenge landlords.

Building Safety Minister Alex Norris said: “Our response today to the Inquiry’s findings sets out a comprehensive plan to reform the construction sector, strengthen oversight and make sure that residents are the priority when deciding on building safety issues.”

Industry accountability and enforcement measures

The government will use Procurement Act powers to investigate seven organisations found to have failed in their responsibilities regarding Grenfell Tower. These include Arconic, Kingspan, Celotex, Exova, Harley Facades, Rydon Maintenance, and Studio E Architects.

If the investigations find grounds for enforcement, these companies could be placed on a debarment list, restricting them from securing public contracts.

Angela Rayner said: “The organisations responsible for building safety failures included the government and regulators. The failures of my department meant risks were ignored, delayed, or disregarded.”

Commitment to supporting Grenfell community and long-term reforms

The government has pledged ongoing support for the Grenfell community and will work with the independent Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission to establish a lasting tribute.

Other key measures include:

  • The publication of quarterly progress reports on the implementation of Inquiry recommendations, starting mid-2025.
  • The introduction of a Fire and Rescue College, designed to improve training and professionalism in the fire service.
  • A mandatory accreditation system for fire risk assessors to prevent unqualified individuals from making critical safety decisions.
  • The continued implementation of a new Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEPs) policy for high-risk buildings.

The government has also reaffirmed its commitment to the Remediation Acceleration Plan, aimed at expediting the removal of unsafe cladding from high-rise buildings.

Industry reacts to government’s Grenfell Inquiry response

National Fire Chiefs Council welcomes reforms

Mark Hardingham, chair of the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC), said the announcement was an important step but stressed the need for continued progress.

“We strongly welcome the government’s acceptance of the Phase 2 recommendations in full, their commitment to introducing tough reforms to fix building safety, their promise to hold industry to account, and their support in fire and rescue service improvement and reform,” Hardingham said.

He added that fire and rescue services had learned lessons since Grenfell, but further work was necessary to address systemic failures: “Services are now better prepared to respond to fires in high-rise residential buildings. But there is further, significant, work underway.”

Fire Brigades Union calls for systemic change

Steve Wright, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), welcomed the government’s acceptance of the Inquiry’s findings but emphasised that the response must lead to real change.

“The Grenfell Tower fire was a preventable tragedy. As the public inquiry concluded last year, it was made possible by an agenda of deregulation and decades of political failure,” Wright said.

He called for greater public oversight: “Government at all levels must listen to the voices of residents. The deregulation of recent years must be reversed to prevent profiteers from putting lives at risk.”

London Fire Commissioner supports reform efforts

The London Fire Commissioner also responded to the government’s announcement, welcoming the commitment to change and the increased focus on resident safety.

“We welcome the government’s commitment to put residents at the heart of the system, and that must start with those people most impacted by this terrible tragedy,” he said.

Fire risk assessor highlights concerns over implementation

Benjamin Ralph, head of building safety and fire at built environment consultancy Hollis, supported the introduction of mandatory accreditation for fire risk assessors but warned of potential challenges.

“Mandatory accreditation for fire risk assessors and the regulation of the fire engineering profession is a crucial step forward,” Ralph said.

However, he cautioned that the transition must be carefully managed: “With a skills shortage already challenging building safety, an abrupt shift could delay vital work. The government must provide clear timelines and fund upskilling to ensure residents are prioritised.”

On the Remediation Acceleration Plan, Ralph said: “It’s good to see the government reaffirm its commitment, but progress must be faster. Residents should not have to wait another five years to feel safe in their homes.”

Industry response on fire safety reforms

Lee Goodenough, director at Harmony Fire, described the government’s response as an essential step towards improving safety standards.

“Today marks an important milestone in both the quest for justice and the drive to make resident safety a non-negotiable across the UK,” Goodenough said.

He added: “We now move forward on an agreed pathway, with clear expectations on government actions and deliverables. Harmony Fire is committed to playing our role in making these critical changes happen.”

Government commits to full implementation of Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations: Summary

The UK government has confirmed it will implement all 58 recommendations from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 report, published on 26 February 2025. The response includes the creation of a single construction regulator, tougher oversight of construction products, and legal protections for social housing tenants.

Seven organisations named in the report will be investigated under the Procurement Act, which could see them barred from public contracts.

The government will introduce a Hillsborough Law, mandating transparency from public authorities in major incidents. It has also committed to a Fire and Rescue College and new accreditation requirements for fire risk assessors.

The Remediation Acceleration Plan will continue, with the government aiming to remove unsafe cladding from high-rise buildings. Progress updates will be published every three months.

Fire safety organisations, including the NFCC, FBU, and London Fire Brigade, have welcomed the government’s response but stress the need for continued implementation and funding. Fire risk experts have also warned of potential challenges in enforcing new standards without further investment in training.

NFCC calls for centralised programme to address unsafe building remediation barriers

by Associations and OrganisationsBreaking NewsBuilding ManagementConstructionSafety

NFCC highlights challenges in building remediation efforts

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has called for a centrally coordinated programme to overcome barriers to remediating unsafe buildings.

Publishing a new Industry White Paper on Remediation, NFCC states that while some progress has been made, significant challenges remain.

These include difficulties in identifying and inspecting affected buildings, workforce shortages, and funding pressures.

NFCC is urging the Government to increase the use of sprinklers in existing residential buildings over 11 metres based on risk assessments.

The council also highlights concerns about the slow pace of remediation efforts and the impact of limited fire safety resources.

Remediation targets and ongoing concerns

The Government’s Remediation Acceleration Plan, published in December, aims to complete remediation of all buildings over 18 metres within government-funded initiatives by the end of 2029.

Buildings over 11 metres with safety defects should either be remediated or have a clear completion timeline by the same deadline.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) estimates that up to 12,000 buildings over 11 metres need remediation.

However, 60% of affected buildings have yet to be identified.

According to NFCC, reviewing or inspecting all mid-rise residential buildings between 11 and 18 metres could take between 12.76 and 24.23 years, with costs ranging from £284.24 million to £608.82 million.

Funding and workforce challenges

Fire and rescue services continue to face increasing responsibilities, including the effects of extreme weather events and ongoing inflationary pressures.

NFCC states that many services will experience real-term funding reductions under next year’s local government financial settlement.

Even with additional funding, NFCC warns that workforce shortages in the construction and fire safety sectors would hinder progress.

Training fire engineers takes three to five years, and many professionals move to higher-paying private sector roles.

The limited availability of qualified personnel has also contributed to wage inflation.

NFCC is calling on the Government to develop a cross-departmental Construction Skills Strategy to address the shortfall in fire engineers, fire risk assessors, and other key roles.

Call for regulatory and competency reforms

The NFCC’s White Paper also urges the Government to implement recommendations from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 report.

These include measures to improve occupational regulation and competency in fire safety professions.

The council is also advocating for updates to building regulations guidance to ensure compliance with the Building Regulations 2010.

NFCC states that a more coordinated and strategic approach is needed to prevent further delays and ensure that residents in unsafe buildings receive necessary protections.

NFCC Chair Mark Hardingham said: “The Grenfell Tower fire was a national tragedy, and yet nearly eight years on, not enough progress has been made in addressing issues in the built environment.

“We need to put the proper processes in place now to fully identify and remove the barriers to remediation, to manage risk and ensure people are protected.”

NFCC calls for centralised programme to address unsafe building remediation barriers: Summary

NFCC has published an Industry White Paper on Remediation, calling for a centrally coordinated approach to address barriers in remediating unsafe buildings.

Challenges include workforce shortages, difficulties in identifying affected buildings, and funding pressures.

The Government’s Remediation Acceleration Plan aims to complete remediation of all high-rise buildings within government-funded schemes by 2029.

However, NFCC warns that existing capacity constraints mean that reviewing or inspecting mid-rise buildings could take up to 24 years.

The council is urging the Government to introduce a Construction Skills Strategy to address shortages in fire safety professionals.

NFCC is also calling for regulatory reforms and increased use of sprinklers in residential buildings over 11 metres.

NFCC Chair Mark Hardingham and Protection Committee Chair Dave Russel stress the need for urgent action to avoid further delays and ensure the safety of residents in affected buildings.

Northumbrian Water Group selects Blackline Safety for worker protection

by ConstructionFeatured NewsHealth and SafetyPPESafety

Blackline Safety technology adopted at Northumbrian Water treatment sites

Northumbrian Water Group (NWG) has chosen Blackline Safety’s connected safety technology to enhance worker protection at two of its water treatment sites in the UK.

The company, which supplies water and wastewater treatment services to nearly five million people across northeast and southeast England, is the eighth UK water company to implement Blackline’s safety devices.

Blackline’s cloud-connected G7c personal gas wearable and EXO area monitor will be used to consolidate gas detection, communication, and lone worker connectivity into a single system.

Safety concerns drive adoption of connected safety devices

NWG’s decision to invest in Blackline Safety technology follows industry-wide concerns about worker exposure to hazardous gases, contaminated water, combustible gas explosions, and the risks associated with lone work and confined space entry.

A fatal explosion at another UK water company’s treatment plant, where four workers lost their lives, also influenced the decision to enhance safety measures.

Dan Woodward, Process Safety Business Partner at NWG, said: “Feedback we were getting from the team on-site was that they just want to do their jobs but had too many devices, apps and things to think about, and anything we could do to simplify the process would be beneficial for everyone.”

Limitations of previous safety equipment

NWG had previously relied on portable gas monitors, mobile phones, and walkie-talkies for gas detection and communication. However, these methods had limitations, including cross-sensitivity issues leading to faulty gas readings, downtime due to off-site calibrations, and ignition risks from mobile phones in biogas-rich areas.

By integrating Blackline’s technology, NWG can now monitor high-risk areas remotely and ensure real-time communication while reducing the number of devices workers need to carry.

Early benefits of Blackline’s safety system

NWG has already identified previously undetected hazards using the new system. The EXO monitor recently detected gas levels reaching 75% of the explosive limit, triggering an immediate ‘stop work’ order and evacuation.

Additionally, the G7 wearables have helped improve worker communication and safety, with push-to-talk functionality enabling walkie-talkie-style communication. The devices also remain operational in underground environments where mobile signals are weak.

Northumbrian Water and Blackline Safety at Health & Safety Event 2025

NWG will join Blackline Safety at the Health & Safety Event in Birmingham, UK, on 9 April 2025, to discuss their approach to worker safety and the role of connected technology in mitigating risks.

Northumbrian Water Group selects Blackline Safety for worker protection: Summary

Northumbrian Water Group has adopted Blackline Safety’s connected safety technology to enhance worker protection at two water treatment sites in the UK.

The company selected the cloud-connected G7c personal gas wearable and EXO area monitor to improve gas detection, communication, and lone worker connectivity.

NWG’s investment follows concerns about worker safety risks, including exposure to hazardous gases and lone work.

A fatal explosion at another UK water company’s site also contributed to the decision.

Previously used portable gas monitors, mobile phones, and walkie-talkies presented limitations such as faulty gas readings and operational downtime.

Blackline’s system has improved efficiency, identified new safety hazards, and streamlined communication.

NWG will present its findings at the Health & Safety Event in Birmingham on 9 April 2025, alongside Blackline Safety.

Zutec acquires Operance to expand UK building safety and compliance solutions

by ConstructionFeatured NewsProjectsSafety

Acquisition enhances compliance solutions for UK construction industry

Zutec has announced the acquisition of Operance as part of its expansion strategy in the UK.

The company stated that the acquisition will support its focus on handover and Building Safety Act compliance solutions for contractors, developers, housebuilders, and asset owners.

Zutec said the acquisition aligns with its goal of integrating customer bases, solutions, and expertise to accelerate digital transformation and compliance in the building sector.

The deal is expected to create new growth opportunities by combining the strengths of both businesses.

Zutec CEO highlights strategic alignment

Gustave Geisendorf, CEO at Zutec, said the acquisition aligns with the company’s broader strategy of investing in businesses that support its growth objectives.

“As we continue investing in businesses as part of our acquisition strategy, Operance fitted our strategic objectives perfectly, with close alignment with our vision and an exciting addition to our business,” said Geisendorf.

“We believe this collaboration will open up new opportunities for us to expand and better serve existing and new customers, setting the stage for future innovations in the construction and property technology space.”

He added that the Operance team will now be part of Zutec, and the combined business will focus on delivering new capabilities in digital construction solutions.

Operance CEO outlines growth benefits

Ian Yeo, CEO at Operance, said the acquisition will allow the company to accelerate its progress and enhance its service offering.

“Having built up the Operance business, and with a shared growth ambition, we welcome being part of Zutec,” Yeo said.

“As a profitable, fast-growing business primarily focused on the UK and Ireland, this partnership with Zutec will allow us to accelerate our progress faster and provide even more value to the construction and property digital ecosystem as one company.”

Focus on digital transformation in construction

Zutec and Operance said the integration of their technologies and expertise will provide enhanced compliance tools for the UK construction sector.

The companies will work together to deliver solutions that support regulatory requirements and digital transformation in asset management.

Zutec stated that the acquisition reinforces its commitment to expanding its presence in the UK market and delivering technology that improves compliance processes in the construction and property management industries.

Zutec acquires Operance to expand UK building safety and compliance solutions: Summary

Zutec has acquired Operance to strengthen its position in the UK construction and property management software market.

Zutec said the acquisition aligns with its strategy of integrating solutions to support handover and Building Safety Act compliance.

CEO Gustave Geisendorf stated that the acquisition aligns with Zutec’s growth strategy and will enhance services for new and existing customers.

Operance CEO Ian Yeo said the acquisition will accelerate the company’s progress and increase its impact on the digital construction ecosystem.

Zutec confirmed that the companies will work together to develop compliance-focused solutions for contractors, developers, housebuilders, and asset owners.

The acquisition supports Zutec’s continued expansion in the UK and Ireland.

Siderise challenges Kensington and Chelsea building material exclusion in court

by ConstructionFeatured NewsPassive

Judicial review initiated over Siderise product exclusion

Siderise Insulation Ltd has initiated judicial review proceedings against the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC).

The company is seeking the withdrawal and reversal of an RBKC decision made on 11 December 2024, which excludes Siderise products from construction projects within the borough.

RBKC’s decision is based on criteria linked to the Grenfell Tower fire.

Siderise argues that the criteria are being applied incorrectly in its case.

The company states that while its products were used in the Grenfell Tower refurbishment, the Grenfell Inquiry Report does not attribute any responsibility to the firm for the fire or its spread.

Siderise challenges basis of RBKC decision

RBKC’s exclusion policy targets companies that the council deems to have engaged in dishonesty, incompetence, or misleading behaviour related to the Grenfell tragedy.

Siderise states that the Grenfell Inquiry found no evidence of dishonesty or incompetence on its part.

The company contends that RBKC’s decision is unjustified and does not align with the inquiry’s findings.

Protecting company reputation and industry role

Siderise has positioned itself as a supplier of external passive fire protection products and states that it has worked to improve industry standards since the Grenfell fire.

The company emphasises that the exclusion by RBKC affects its reputation and its ability to provide fire protection solutions in the UK and internationally.

RBKC has acknowledged that some companies were excluded from the decision due to a lack of evidence of wrongdoing.

Siderise argues that it should fall within this category.

Siderise reaffirms commitment to building safety

Despite the legal proceedings, Siderise has stated that it remains committed to advancing building safety through its products, systems, and services.

The company continues to work towards higher industry standards and compliance.

Siderise has framed its challenge against RBKC as an effort to protect its standing as a British manufacturer supplying fire safety solutions worldwide.

Judicial review initiated over Siderise product exclusion: Summary

Siderise Insulation Ltd has launched judicial review proceedings against the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea following a decision on 11 December 2024 that excludes its products from construction projects in the borough.

The exclusion is based on criteria linked to the Grenfell Tower fire.

Siderise argues that the Grenfell Inquiry Report does not support the exclusion, as there was no finding of dishonesty, incompetence, or misleading behaviour by the company.

RBKC has stated that some companies were not included in its exclusion policy due to a lack of evidence against them, and Siderise believes it should be among them.

The company is taking legal action to challenge the decision and protect its reputation.

Siderise has stated that it remains focused on building safety and supporting industry standards through its products and services.

Greater London Authority discusses fire safety and viability of tall buildings

by ConstructionFeatured NewsProjects

Second staircases and viability concerns impact London high-rise developments

The Greater London Authority (GLA) is facing challenges in balancing fire safety requirements and the viability of tall building developments in the capital, according to Inside Housing.

Jules Pipe, deputy mayor for planning, regeneration and the fire service, spoke during a planning and regeneration committee meeting about the implications of updated British Standards.

These standards now require additional staircases and lifts in high-rise buildings, which he said has raised viability concerns.

Pipe stated: “With additional lifts, you need additional refuge space and an additional core, even if there are only eight flats.

“It is putting scheme viability in question and, in the short term, the issue is causing stalling.

“Some major sites in London are being stalled by questions of viability because of this.”

As reported by Inside Housing, research commissioned by the UK government found that a second staircase in high-rise buildings can halve evacuation times.

In response, new guidance issued in April 2024 introduced a two-year transition period for developers to comply with the updated standards.

Challenges in defining and locating tall buildings

Inside Housing reported that Pipe also addressed broader concerns about how tall buildings are defined and where they should be located under GLA policy.

He explained that definitions of tall buildings vary across London boroughs, creating inconsistencies in planning.

“Broadly, Part C of the policy, on the impact and quality of buildings, is working.

“But Part A, which concerns the definition of tall buildings, and Part B, on their location, have been problematic.”

Pipe highlighted legal limitations on planning enforcement, stating: “‘Should’ is not written into the London Plan.

‘Must’ may be included but where it is, it is not enforceable.” He cited a 2021 judicial review in Hillingdon, which found that policy 9B could not be used to prevent tall building developments outright.

According to Inside Housing, Pipe suggested that the London Plan could be revised to provide greater statutory force in the next update, which is expected to be adopted in 2027.

London boroughs face limitations in restricting high-rise developments

Planning officials told the committee that despite concerns about their suitability for families and fire safety, boroughs have limited ability to restrict high-rise developments.

As reported by Inside Housing, this is due to legal rulings that prevent height alone from being used as grounds for refusal.

Section 9 of the London Plan allows boroughs to specify the size, location, and impact of tall buildings within planning frameworks.

However, Inside Housing noted that the 2021 judicial review ruling means boroughs cannot reject developments purely based on height.

This has led to increased high-density residential developments, particularly in areas such as Tower Hamlets, Southwark, and Lewisham, where planners prioritise them for transport and sustainability reasons.

Andrew Boff, chair of the planning and regeneration committee, said: “We’ve had evidence before that tall buildings aren’t suitable for families.”

Assembly member Shaun Bailey echoed this concern, stating that many families on London’s housing waiting lists would not choose high-rise living.

Views on high-rise living differ among stakeholders

While concerns remain, some local authority representatives argued that high-rise buildings provide a viable solution for meeting London’s housing demand, Inside Housing reported.

Colin Wilson, head of regeneration for Old Kent Road at Southwark Council, said that mid-rise blocks within high-density developments offer family-friendly housing options.

He stated: “A housing offer in this development would typically be a three-bedroom flat in a mid-rise block, with a generous-sized balcony and good communal space.”

Jessica Potter, urban design team leader for Old Kent Road regeneration at Southwark Council, said that while co-living and student housing are included in these developments, affordable housing remains a priority.

She said: “Tenants are happy with living in mid-rise towers. They’ve lived in flatted accommodation before.

“They are more concerned that they have the space and quality they wanted.”

Michael Ritchie, placeshaping manager at Tower Hamlets Council, added that resident feedback on high-rise living has been mixed.

“Tower Hamlets has a lot of tall buildings and we expect to deliver a lot more. In 2019, we surveyed a thousand people who lived in 10 tall developments on different floors.

“Generally speaking, people were positive about it, which is not what we were expecting.”

As Inside Housing reported, planners continue to debate the best way to balance density, fire safety, and family-friendly housing in London’s growing skyline.

Greater London Authority discusses fire safety and viability of tall buildings, as reported by Inside Housing: Summary

According to Inside Housing, the Greater London Authority is facing challenges in implementing fire safety measures while maintaining the viability of tall building developments.

Deputy mayor Jules Pipe highlighted that new British Standards requiring second staircases and additional lifts have led to delays in major projects.

Government research found that second staircases halve evacuation times, leading to new guidance issued in April 2024 with a two-year transition period.

Inside Housing also reported that challenges remain in defining tall buildings under GLA policy, with borough-level variations creating planning inconsistencies.

A 2021 judicial review determined that boroughs cannot reject developments based on height alone, resulting in increased high-rise construction, particularly in Tower Hamlets, Southwark, and Lewisham.

Committee members expressed concerns over the suitability of tall buildings for families, but local council representatives argued that high-density developments provide affordable housing options.

A 2019 Tower Hamlets survey found mixed resident feedback, with some expressing positive experiences in high-rise living.