New online tools aim to prevent suicides within the fire community

The Fire Fighters Charity introduces suicide prevention resources

In a recent initiative, The Fire Fighters Charity announced the launch of a new suite of online suicide prevention and postvention resources.

This effort targets the reduction of suicides within the UK’s fire services community.

Collaboration brings evidence-based resources

Developed in partnership with Nottingham Trent University, these tools are the culmination of thorough research into the health and wellbeing of the fire sector.

They offer practical and evidence-based support for individuals contemplating suicide or those concerned about someone who might be.

These online resources comprise a range of materials.

From videos and specially curated content to downloadable PDFs, they cater to various needs, including support for individuals affected by suicide.

Voices from the field highlight the significance

Dr Jill Tolfrey, Chief Executive of The Fire Fighters Charity, commented on the resources: “Every suicide is a preventable tragedy.”

She mentioned awareness of at least 20 fire service personnel who have succumbed to suicide in the past three years.

Tolfrey further emphasised the charity’s commitment, saying: “As the fire community’s charity, we aim to prevent these tragedies and offer hope to those in crisis.”

In the same light, Professor Rowena Hill, part of the suicide prevention project team at The Fire Fighters Charity, stated: “The loss of a fire community member through suicide highlights the importance of recognising early signs that someone needs support.”

Hill urged members of the fire community to familiarise themselves with these resources and share them with their families.

Professor Karen Slade welcomed the recent release of the Government’s new suicide prevention strategy.

She expressed her satisfaction with the national strategy’s alignment with their work, highlighting the proactive approach they’re taking in offering both pre- and post-suicide support.

Research reveals alarming trends

Nottingham Trent University’s study, which informed these resources, was published earlier this year in May.

It surveyed over 3,000 fire and rescue service personnel and uncovered that factors like sleep disruption, occupational stress, and mental health conditions were affecting their mental wellbeing.

IFSJ Comment

The well-being and mental health of fire and rescue personnel cannot be overstated.

The insights provided by Nottingham Trent University’s research underscore the challenges faced by these brave individuals daily.

Collaborative efforts, such as the one between The Fire Fighters Charity and Nottingham Trent University, are steps in the right direction.

By creating tangible resources, they’re not just acknowledging the issue but actively offering solutions.

We believe initiatives like this can make a real difference in safeguarding our fire community.

Scottish firefighters participate in innovative health trials

Hundreds of firefighters undergo health trials in Scotland

Scottish firefighters are participating in health trials in an effort to detect potential health risks related to their profession.

The testing, taking place between Monday 11th and Wednesday 13th September in Edinburgh, has seen nearly 200 Scottish firefighters providing blood and urine samples.

The aim is to detect early signs of cancers and other diseases and establish connections between occupational cancers and exposure to toxic fire chemicals.

This study is a part of a larger UK-wide firefighter health monitoring research project commissioned by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) and executed by the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan).

Health trials highlight occupational risks

Recent research has revealed that UK firefighters aged 35-39 face cancer rates up to 323% higher than their peers in the general population.

There are also heightened risks of specific cancers, with firefighters being 3.8 times more susceptible to prostate cancer and 3.17 times to leukaemia, for example.

This testing initiative is a UK first and aligns with a World Health Organisation statement that identifies occupational exposure in firefighting as carcinogenic.

Authorities and experts weigh in on health trials

Riccardo La Torre, FBU national officer, expressed: “This research is a vital part of our campaign to protect firefighters from cancer and other occupational disease.”

John McKenzie, FBU Scotland regional secretary, emphasised the importance of such initiatives: “Every firefighter who has volunteered to participate in these health trials should be proud of their contribution to workplace safety.”

SFRS Assistant Chief Officer Andy Watt stated: “The SFRS has already undertaken work to minimise the risk of contaminants for our staff and we will continue to work in partnership with the FBU and Professor Anna Stec to develop and deliver further improvements.”

Professor Anna Stec, renowned for her expertise in fire chemistry and toxicity, highlighted: “This is the first study of its kind in UK and the research brings to light the wide range of occupational hazards that firefighters face.”

IFSJ Comment

The efforts made in Scotland to assess and improve the health of firefighters are commendable.

The health implications tied to the profession have been long-debated, and this study marks a significant step in understanding and combating these risks.

Recognising the elevated risk faced by firefighters, as well as taking proactive measures, could pave the way for greater workplace safety measures and health initiatives not only in Scotland but also across the UK.

Firefighter Syndrome – Understanding Unseen Psychological & Physical Risks

A recent article from the University of Hawaii sheds light on the often-overlooked challenges faced by firefighters in their line of work – firefighter syndrome.

With firefighters having to grapple with a variety of scenarios that can cause trauma, both physically and mentally, are we ignoring a potentially health time-bomb by not addressing the elephant in the room?

We address this very real and present concern in the chapters below.

The Science Behind Firefighter Syndrome

Chris Frueh, a respected psychology professor at the University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo, teamed up with researchers Isabella Zingray and Gina Rudine, offering insights into the wide-ranging medical, psychological, and social risks firefighters grapple with.

Due to the nature of their job, firefighters are constantly exposed to chronic stress and life-threatening situations.

These repeated exposures can lead to serious physiological changes, such as traumatic brain injuries and toxic exposures.

Frueh commented on the objective of their research:

“What we want to do is provide a framework for people who are midcareer to late career to retired to begin to understand their injuries and to begin to be able to understand how to take care of themselves and how to look for medical care that they may need.”

A Disparity in Medical Research

It’s concerning to note the significant gap in medical research concerning firefighters’ health.

In 2021, a study highlighted that firefighters remain one of the least researched high-risk groups.

There was a 30 to 1 ratio in medical journal articles about veterans compared to firefighters.

Frueh emphasised the disparity, stating: “It means we know almost nothing about the types of injuries and health problems that firefighters develop over the course of a career.”

A Framework for Understanding & Support

Frueh’s team, inspired by their previous work on “Operator Syndrome” with military special operators, introduced a framework addressing what they’ve termed “Firefighter Syndrome”.

This comprehensive approach aims to provide holistic support for first-responders.

The ambition is for this groundwork to have a positive effect on firefighters not just in Hawaiʻi, but across the world.

They’ve also crafted a questionnaire, allowing firefighters to self-assess and gauge potential elements they might be experiencing.

This public-domain tool is available for medical professionals and firefighters, intended to inform and guide them back to safety.

Firefighter Syndrome Characteristics

The framework highlights a variety of concerns:

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and toxic exposures.
  • Hormonal issues.
  • Sleep problems.
  • Chronic pain and orthopedic issues.
  • Substance abuse.
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression.
  • Challenges with memory, concentration, and cognitive functions.
  • Issues with family relations and intimacy.
  • Constant state of high alertness.
  • Problems transitioning between home and work.

Frueh elaborated on its importance: “An individual firefighter can look through it and see ‘Oh, my goodness, I check these boxes.’

“It can also be used as a way to educate spouses or family members—and, importantly, to review with their healthcare providers.”

Moreover, the researchers provided guidelines for firefighters, addressing essential topics from suicide risk assessment to finding a reliable primary care provider.

Conclusion

The often-overlooked challenges firefighters face in their profession, both physically and psychologically, deserve our attention and action.

The disparity in research concerning their health risks compared to other high-risk professions is alarming.

Equipping these brave individuals with knowledge, resources, and support systems can make a world of difference, ensuring their well-being as they continue their vital role in our communities.

Scottish firefighters set to join UK-wide health screening trials

Scottish government’s funding initiative

The Scottish Government has provided funding of £56,000 to enable firefighters based in Scotland to join a UK-wide health screening programme.

This initiative is facilitated by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) and the University of Central Lancashire.

Approximately 1,000 UK firefighters are expected to participate in these trials, which will focus on blood tests aiming to detect early signs of illness and cancer.

These trials will contribute to the decision-making process surrounding potential annual health screening in the future.

Endorsement from officials

Siobhian Brown, Minister for Victims and Community Safety, expressed her support: “I am delighted that we have been able to provide funding to ensure that Scottish firefighters are part of this important research.

“We will continue to work closely with the FBU and the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service to ensure the safety and wellbeing of firefighters who tirelessly serve our communities.”

Importance of health screening for firefighters

Research reveals that firefighters report higher incidences of diseases, including cancers, compared to the general population.

These findings stem from a study titled, “Minimising firefighters’ exposure to toxic fire effluents,” commissioned by the FBU and conducted by Professor Anna Stec of the University of Central Lancashire, published in January 2020.

A subsequent study on Scottish firefighters was released in January 2023.

This research spurred an FBU campaign advocating for enhanced health monitoring and the establishment of the FBU DECON Campaign.

Comments from FBU and SFRS officials

John McKenzie, the Regional Secretary for the FBU in Scotland, said: “The FBU welcomes these health monitoring trials: they are essential for the continued safety and health of our members.

“We also appreciate the additional funding from the Scottish Government for this research.”

Efforts to protect firefighter health have been a collaborative endeavour between the SFRS and FBU.

The SFRS has formed a dedicated Contaminants Group, aiming to reduce firefighters’ exposure to harmful substances.

This initiative encompasses the creation of operational policies, ongoing training, and station audits.

Andy Watt, SFRS Assistant Chief Officer, expressed the service’s commitment: “This initiative showcases our unwavering commitment to firefighter safety.

“We have already undertaken measures to minimise risk from contaminants, and our partnership with the FBU and Professor Stec will spearhead further advancements.

“Our staff’s safety is of utmost importance.”

John McKenzie reaffirmed this sentiment, highlighting the need for ongoing vigilance: “The FBU continues its collaborative efforts with the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service to address fire contaminants risks.

“The Contaminants Group’s endeavours are pivotal, and we anticipate seeing their positive impact in the near future.”

IFSJ Comment

The decision by the Scottish Government to fund and support health screening trials for firefighters, especially within the context of the evident risks they face daily, is a significant step forward.

This initiative not only underscores the value placed on firefighter health and safety but also propels a broader discussion about best practices across the profession.

By actively monitoring and understanding potential health risks, agencies can implement strategies that protect those on the frontline.

It’s a commendable move that other firefighting entities globally should closely observe.

Fire safety concerns prompt legal challenge against Bibby Stockholm barge

Fire Brigades Union moves towards legal action over safety concerns on the Bibby Stockholm

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has initiated a legal challenge regarding the Bibby Stockholm barge.

In a Pre-Action Protocol letter, the union voiced its apprehensions about safety on the barge to the Home Secretary.

The government has been given a deadline until Thursday, 31st August, to respond.

The Home Secretary’s stance on the Bibby Stockholm barge safety

Previously, the union sought a meeting with the Home Secretary to discuss its worries.

However, the request for this meeting was declined earlier this month. Matt Wrack, the general secretary of the FBU, commented: “The Fire Brigades Union is the professional voice of firefighters. We have been sounding the alarm about the Bibby Stockholm for weeks.”

He further expressed disappointment in the Home Secretary’s reluctance to engage in discussions on the matter.

About the Bibby Stockholm Barge

The Bibby Stockholm barge, based in Portland Port, Dorset, was introduced as part of the government’s plans to house asylum seekers.

This initiative, led by Home Secretary Suella Braverman, aimed to reduce the cost of asylum accommodations by using barges.

The Bibby Stockholm is owned by Liverpool-based Bibby Marine and has faced various challenges since its introduction, both from legal and public perspectives.

The vessel is a three-storey barge intended to house approximately 500 men awaiting their asylum application results.

Several issues, including overcrowding and limited fire exit access, have been raised by the FBU.

Recent media reports indicate that while the barge has three fire exits, one of them is not operational due to safety concerns regarding the steepness of an associated gangway.

Furthermore, the barge, which initially boasted 222 single-occupancy rooms, had extra beds installed to increase its capacity to 506.

IFSJ Comment

The legal challenge underscores the significance of comprehensive fire safety checks and the essential need to maintain safety standards in all accommodations, regardless of their purpose.

The ongoing debate around the Bibby Stockholm barge brings to light the potential risks involved when regulatory guidelines may not have been adhered to strictly.

It also underlines the importance of transparency and collaboration between authorities, organisations, and concerned parties to ensure public safety.

Auckland accommodation reveals fire safety concerns, according to council study

Fire safety gaps found in Auckland’s budget lodgings

A concerning number of budget accommodations in Auckland are showing gaps in their fire safety measures, according to a recent study by Auckland Council.

Council’s findings on fire safety

Auckland Council’s inspections team discovered issues in approximately 50% of the 170 buildings they inspected.

This inspection was prompted by a tragic fire incident at Loafers Lodge in May, which drew attention to potential fire hazards in similar accommodations.

Two of these buildings were severe enough to warrant a dangerous building notice.

Furthermore, another 80 displayed various fire safety concerns such as exits blocked by rubbish or improperly used smokestop doors.

Jeff Fahrensohn, the Auckland Council inspections manager, commented: “It was a surprise how many low-cost accommodation providers had fire safety deficiencies.”

He noted the building managers’ and owners’ apparent lack of knowledge on fire safety as a significant concern.

Details of the safety lapses

While compromised alarm systems weren’t an issue in the inspected properties, 40 to 50% showed other deficiencies.

The two most concerning buildings, which each housed between 50 to 100 residents, had problems like malfunctioning emergency lights and obstructed exits.

However, they continue to operate with added security measures.

Fahrensohn assured that if any building posed an immediate threat, they would’ve evacuated it.

Interestingly, these two properties had passed their previous audit without any noted issues.

Other buildings with concerns had issues like blocked exits, which were promptly addressed.

Legal and future implications

By law, the responsibility of maintaining safety systems lies with the building owners.

They are mandated to perform routine checks and undergo regular expert building warrant of fitness audits.

Fahrensohn stated the need for more education on this matter but also affirmed, “we’ll escalate to enforcement where we have to”.

Of the 170 buildings investigated, 13 were under further scrutiny by the council.

Meanwhile, the government has a list of 70 similar buildings nationwide, but Auckland Council has already audited those in its region.

As for the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) initiating a separate audit, Fahrensohn mentioned they’re still awaiting communication.

IFSJ Comment

The findings from Auckland Council’s study highlight a broader concern.

The evident gaps in fire safety knowledge among building managers and owners in such a major city like Auckland suggest that similar oversights might be prevalent elsewhere.

Routine checks and audits are crucial.

However, this case underscores the importance of continuous education and awareness about fire safety standards and regulations.

The role of governing bodies, industry leaders, and the community at large becomes imperative to ensure the safety of residents in such accommodations.

IAFF advocates for a nationwide asbestos ban in the US

The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) is backing a bill in the US aimed at implementing a nationwide ban on asbestos, hoping to reduce the asbestos-related deaths that affect dozens of fire fighters annually.

Fire fighters at greater risk due to asbestos exposure

Greg Russell, IAFF Governmental Affairs Representative, recently spoke at a congressional staff briefing on the proposed legislation.

He clarified that asbestos is a known carcinogen causing diseases such as mesothelioma and cancers of the lung, larynx, and ovaries.

It’s particularly concerning for fire fighters who often face exposure to airborne asbestos fibres in their line of duty.

Russell said: “Fire fighters are regularly exposed to airborne asbestos fibres as they respond to fires and other hazardous situations, making them 200 times more likely to develop related illnesses than the general public.”

He added that occupational cancers are now the leading cause of death among fire fighters.

To address this, the union is actively seeking solutions.

Recent events underline the urgency for an asbestos ban

Highlighting the seriousness of the issue, Russell shared an incident from Richmond, Indiana.

Fire fighters from the Richmond Local 1403 were called to a warehouse fire insulated with asbestos.

While they managed to control the fire quickly, it lingered for several days, causing prolonged asbestos exposure.

Following the fire, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identified asbestos particles on over 300 properties nearby.

Russell said: “The situation in Indiana illustrates why the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified firefighting as a Group 1 carcinogen.”

He urged lawmakers to prioritise the health and safety of fire fighters by adopting measures such as the proposed asbestos ban.

Global push for asbestos ban gains momentum

Currently, over 70 countries have prohibited the use of asbestos. Should the US pass the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act, it would ban the import, use, and sale of asbestos.

Additionally, industries working with asbestos would need to switch to non-asbestos technology, a transition seen as economically viable and eco-friendly.

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, co-founded by Linda Reinstein, is leading a coalition in support of the bill.

Reinstein’s dedication stems from a personal tragedy, as her husband Alan succumbed to diseases caused by asbestos exposure.

She highlighted the significance of the legislation, mentioning that it aims to safeguard a broad spectrum of Americans, including vulnerable workers, first responders, and especially children.

IFSJ Comment

The support by IAFF for a nationwide asbestos ban sheds light on the pressing concern of asbestos-related health hazards, especially for fire fighters.

Exposure to this carcinogen has proven fatal for many, and the Richmond incident underscores the risk present in older structures insulated with asbestos.

With over 70 nations already enforcing a similar ban, the push for the U.S. to adopt this legislation is timely.

The move will not only protect the lives of our brave first responders but also benefit the broader community, reinforcing public health and safety standards.

About IAFF

The International Association of Fire Fighters, commonly known as IAFF, is an influential organisation dedicated to representing the interests of professional fire fighters and paramedics in the US and Canada.

They are committed to improving the working conditions of their members, promoting safety, and advocating for better community health and safety regulations.

IAFF welcomes new legislation in Canada proposing stronger penalties for assaults on first responders

Violence against first responders rising in Canada

With the rising incidence of violence against first responders in Canada, the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) is welcoming newly proposed legislation.

Bill C-345, introduced in the House of Commons on June 19 by B.C. NDP MP Peter Julian, aims to create new Criminal Code penalties and more severe sentences for those who assault on-duty firefighters and paramedics.

IAFF and local leaders discuss the need for greater protection

A press conference was held on July 5 with leaders from the British Columbia Professional Fire Fighters Association (BCPFFA) and members of IAFF locals 323 Burnaby and 256 New Westminster.

During the conference, they discussed why greater protections are needed.

Peter Julian stated: “It has been disturbing to me to see an increase in the number of assaults and the violence against fire fighters and paramedics.”

He cited recent examples of such violence.

IAFF supports the proposed amendments to the Criminal Code

The bill aims to expand existing protections for peace officers by defining first responders to include firefighters and paramedics.

It proposes a new offence for assaults against first responders in the course of their duties.

In addition, the proposed legislation suggests an increased maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment for assault against a first responder.

Aggravated assault against a first responder could lead to a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment.

If an assault against a firefighter or paramedic results in death, the bill proposes an automatic first-degree murder charge with a life imprisonment penalty and no possibility of parole for 25 years.

BCPFFA President Todd Schierling expressed his support, saying: “It’s time to include first responders in the same level of protection as peace officers. Such provisions serve to help make emergency responders safer when protecting Canadians.”

Shane Poole, New Westminster Local 256 President, agreed, noting: “We know our job is inherently dangerous, but when we respond to calls for help, we shouldn’t have to be faced with the potential for violence or assaults.”

The IAFF has also declared support for Bill C-321, a separate private member’s bill introduced by B.C. Conservative MP Todd Doherty in March, which would require consideration of an assault victim’s status as an on-duty first responder during sentencing.

IFSJ Comment

The rising number of assaults on first responders is a concerning trend that needs to be addressed.

The new legislation in Canada reflects an essential step towards offering additional protection to firefighters and paramedics, who risk their lives daily to protect others.

The collaboration between various local associations and IAFF in supporting this bill highlights the unified stance in safeguarding those who serve on the front lines.

US Senators reintroduce legislation to enhance fire safety in public housing

Legislation to retrofit public housing buildings with sprinkler systems

U.S. Senators Tina Smith and Amy Klobuchar have reintroduced legislation to help install sprinkler systems in older public housing buildings, aiming to increase safety and save lives.

A detailed outline of the proposed legislation can be found here.

Companion legislation has been introduced in the House by US Representatives Bonnie Watson Coleman and John Rutherford, with support from Representative Ilhan Omar.

The Public Housing Fire Safety Act is a response to the tragic Cedar High Apartments fire in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in 2019.

The upper floors of the building where the fire erupted did not have sprinkler systems installed.

Key quotes from the officials on public housing fire safety

Senator Klobuchar stated: “In the wake of the tragic 2019 Cedar High Apartments Fire, I joined Senator Smith in introducing legislation to ensure that buildings have properly installed fire and sprinkler systems.

“Every second counts during a house fire, and with up-to-date systems, more lives can be saved.

“We need to continue these efforts by passing the Public Housing Fire Safety Act to bring us one step closer towards ensuring that buildings are safe for all residents.”

Senator Smith remarked: “The fire at Cedar High Apartments was a tragic loss for the Cedar-Riverside community.

“In the aftermath of the tragedy, I began connecting with people closely affected by the fire and looking into ways to prevent it from happening again.

“This bill gets to the root of what we need to do: incentivise public housing authorities to install sprinkler systems and give them the support they need to do it.”

Bill Webb, Executive Director of the Congressional Fire Services Institute, noted the importance of investment in retrofitting with fire sprinkler systems for public housing safety.

Trinidad Uribe, President of the USA Sprinkler Fitters Association, called the Public Housing Fire Safety Act a “crucial and necessary solution to improving the safety of public housing facilities and protecting the lives of tenants across the country.”

Details of the Public Housing Fire Safety Act and historical context

The Federal Fire Safety Act of 1992 mandated the installation of sprinklers in all newly constructed government-owned high-rise buildings.

However, thousands of public housing apartment buildings around the country were built before that date, leaving them without mandatory sprinkler systems.

Nearly all of the high-rise public housing buildings in Minneapolis were constructed prior to these regulations.

The Public Housing Fire Safety Act would create an annual $25 million competitive grant programme to provide funds to public housing authorities wishing to retrofit older high-rise apartment buildings with sprinkler systems.

Senators Smith and Klobuchar have previously secured $2 million in funding for the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority to install fire sprinklers in outdated public housing, reflecting a long-standing commitment to safety in public housing.

IFSJ Comment

The reintroduction of legislation aimed at improving fire safety measures in public housing reflects a timely response to the ongoing challenge of keeping residents safe.

By focusing on retrofitting older buildings with sprinkler systems, the Public Housing Fire Safety Act has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of tragic incidents like the Cedar High Apartments fire in 2019.

We will continue to monitor the development of this legislation and its potential impact on public housing across the country.

Exclusive: Guardians of Glastonbury

Gerald Taylor, Devon and Somerset’s Assistant Chief Fire Officer, unveils the intricate fire safety preparations and operations at the globally renowned Glastonbury music festival

Music, art, and camaraderie – these are usually the highlights that come to mind when you think about Glastonbury Festival.

But behind the scenes of the UK’s largest greenfield music and performing arts festival, a different type of rhythm beats – that of the meticulously orchestrated fire safety protocols.

To shed light on these hidden heroes of the festival, we sat down with Gerald Taylor, the Assistant Chief Fire Officer and Director of Service Delivery at Devon and Somerset Fire & Rescue Service.

The festival fire safety team is tasked with the enormous responsibility of ensuring the safety of over 200,000 attendees, performers, and staff at the five-day festival.

From strategy planning to emergency response, Taylor’s insights reveal how critical fire safety planning is to the successful execution of this world-renowned event.

Can you explain the process involved in getting approval for the various plans need to put in place for the festival?

The first thing to say is that Glastonbury has been going since the 1970s – it’s not like you’re starting from scratch.

But it has evolved and changed massively over the years to become a very highly and professionally managed event.

The licence for the festival is key to planning.

A key licencing agreement is that the festival is organised through a SAG (Safety Advisory Group) which they refer to in the in the case of Glastonbury Festival as ‘the multi-agency partnership’, otherwise known as the MAP.

All of the plans for the licence requirement are developed through that multi agency partnership.

 Some of them, the fire service are very directly involved in as you can imagine, such as the fire safety plan, the major incident plan, the command and control plan.

We have direct conversations through meetings to develop those and make sure we’re comfortable with them.

For the more technical plans such as the crowd control and crowd dynamics, we get fire safety professionals involved.

I sign them off, but I do so the advice of the professionals.

The collaborative involvement in their development gives us the competence to sign off through the Council.

What do you need to plan for?

For that the festival itself, it is very much a risk-based approach.

They look at what the key risks are – crowd dynamics is probably one of the most important one.

The way that the actual timings of the performances take place is all designed around the crowd dynamics.

If you’ve got a major actor playing on the Pyramid Stage, you’ll always have a major actor playing on the Other Stage, which actually starts to control the crowd dynamics.

For a fire rescue perspective, it’s important to point out that for 50 weeks of the year is a farm.

Then, for five days, it’s a city of a quarter of a million people.

It’s very difficult to get people familiar with the risk beforehand because if you just go there, you’re looking at farm.

You need to really make sure that the people involved are experienced, that there is continuity, and that they understand the topography of the site and the risks that exist there.

In terms of the fire risk, you have, for example, pyrotechnics, camping gas cylinders, and temporary stages being built.

It’s a case of ensuring that the all the fire safety legislation is being complied with, despite that very temporary nature.

 A lot of hard work goes into walking around and inspecting those venues, negotiating with the venue managers to make sure that they alter their arrangements if needed.

How does the Devon & Somerset Fire & Rescue Service balance the need for a significant safety presence at the festival while maintaining “business as usual” elsewhere?

One of the things I found that there was a quite a heavy draw on people from around the festival working in the festival, and that left us vulnerable outside.

So in order to mitigate that particular risk, I draw people deliberately from across the whole of Devon and Somerset.

We’re a large fire and rescue service, the largest in England.

By spreading the team from across that geographical area it mitigates any impact in any local area, particularly around the festival site itself.

Could you describe the role and activities of the business safety officers during the festival?

The fire safety officers are the people who are qualified to inspect and enforce the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order.

They are qualified people to carry out those inspections, and put in place any enforcement required.

They are very experienced individuals because you’re going to need to deal with some fairly unique risk and work out how to support the festival in in making changes to make sure we haven’t got dangerous conditions in place.

We have a massive tabletop exercise before the festival where we bring together the emergency services and the organisers for each of the venues.

When you sit with them and start talking to them about what their backgrounds are, you find that they are highly qualified individuals.

We all think it’s a group of unqualified roadies , they’re not at all they are engineers, they are highly professional in terms of the way that they consider health and safety.

 It’s never really too much of a battle to get things changed.

They do listen to us and make changes as needed.

I can’t big them up enough.

It’s such a professionally organised event.

The first year I went, I was like a rabbit in the headlights and in awe of the arrangements that are in place.

But it’s such an important festival.

Some people describe it as probably the safest festival, and that’s a reflection on the efforts and professionals of everyone involved.

There was a fire in the Pilton Palais at the festival this year – what happened and how was it handled?

The Pilton Palais is a cinema tent.

Just ahead of a screening the projector caught fire.

That was previously recognised as one of the key potential risk areas for that for that specific marquee and so there was a fire point right next to the projection room with a fire extinguishers in place.

As soon as it caught fire, trained stewards grabbed extinguishers and put it out.

The small fire itself was over and done with before we got there.

Our role was literally to get the PPV fans in place, get the smoke out of the venue, move the projector outside, and then check with a thermal imaging camera to make sure that there was there no other concerns.

It was over and done with before we got there.

How do communicate fire safety to the many thousands of festival goers?

All our campaigns are always based on historical data that we have about what instances we’ve been dealing with.

The risks we deal with, particularly around gas canisters, carbon monoxide, and just camping generally.

We produce social media messaging which then the festival shares through social media accounts.

If there is a more significant event during the event, there are vast communication systems on site. There are 10,000s of stewards are all linked on communications.

There are also massive screens on either side of the stage that we can use if needed to get messaging out there in an emergency. We also have 24/7 command and control through an on-site multi-agency Tactical Control Group.

You engaged with the Gypsy and traveller community prior to the event – can you tell me more about this?

They’ve got a strong history with the festival.

They arrive on the farm in March-April time, certainly early on.

They live in caravans and they are, in normal circumstances, a hard to reach community.

One of our colleagues has got a background in engagement with the them and he gets onsite early, builds those relationships, looks at their caravans and their vehicles and will look to fit smoke alarms and increase their awareness of fire safety within their environment.

 For us it’s a fantastic opportunity to engage with what can sometimes be a hard to engage with group.

 It’s a very positive relationship and an opportunity that is helped massively by the festival.

You work with Glastonbury Fire Safety during the festival – how does that collaboration work and what are their responsibilities?

The event is run through a company called Glastonbury Festival Events limited.

They contract in Glastobury Fire Safety.

They provide first response; they’ve got teams of first responders – firefighters in four-by-four vehicles with beaters and fire extinguishers.

In first instance, they will get called out to deal with minor type incidents.

They send an alert to our team and our incident commander will go in and discuss each of the incidents at the Fire Desk in the Event Control Centre and determine whether we need to mobilise alongside their teams.

We have continual dialogue, a very close working relationship with them in terms of managing the overall fire safety and fire response.

It’s a very positive working relationship and collaboration.

Were there any lessons you learned that you plan to carry forward into your preparations for next year’s festival?

We’ve got a really strong debriefing process.

We start with our internal debrief and that will feed into the wider festival fire safety debrief.

So, including Glastonbury Festival, we’ll set that up probably in September.

That will lead into the multi-agency debrief early in the autumn.

The initial feedback we’ve had from the festival was that it went extremely well.

They were very pleased with the arrangements that were in place, and they proved to be very effective in terms of preventing incidents from happening, but also response when anything did happen was very swift and effective.

If there’s any improvements they will be minor – the model is proven to work well at the moment.

This exclusive article was originally published in the August 2023 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.