Bright days ahead for container shipping safety

Consilium Safety Group discusses the integration of digital and AI-driven solutions in container shipping safety, introducing the revolutionary TMS

Almost every shirt we wear, and every gadget we use has made a journey across the seas, a testament to the container shipping industry’s role in knitting the global economy together.

These colourful containers move more than 90 per cent of global trade.

Capable of carrying over 24,000 containers, today´s ships carry an incredible 1 500 percent more containers than in the late 1960s.

Yet, as these ships swell in size, now stretching to the lengths of four football fields, they carry not just cargo but a potential risk of fire.

A peril that grows with every container added to their load.

Thobias Ernfridsson, the Chief Technology Officer at Consilium Safety Group, sits at the heart of efforts to mitigate this risk.

“The expansion of container transportation is undeniable,” he states, “and with it, the risk of fire escalates, posing a significant threat to goods, ships, and more importantly, human lives and the environment.”

A stark reality

This recognition is echoed in the stark figures of the 2023 Cargosafe study, commissioned by the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA), which highlights the potential risk associated with the median operation of these ships.

The study shows a ship faces potential losses including fatalities, cargo, the ship itself, environmental damage, and salvage costs.

As insurance premiums for container shipping rise by 55 per cent, reflecting the increased risks of fire and cargo loss, the industry is at a crossroads.

“With the values aboard these vessels soaring, insurance costs can account for the third highest operational expense, after fuel and crew,” Ernfridsson explains.

Yet, amidst the calculus of risk and premium, Ernfridsson sees a silver lining: “Cut through the risk, and you slice through the premiums. It’s straightforward economics but underpinned by a complex challenge.”

Innovation at the helm

In the wake of disaster, innovation often follows, spurred by necessity and the collective will for change.

“Accidents are never good, but it is usually the way that triggers a desire for change”, says Ernfridsson.

 This sentiment is echoed across the industry, from insurance companies and ship owners to ports and suppliers, all recognizing the need for a more digital and AI-driven approach to early detection and fire prevention.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has responded with plans to introduce new fire safety regulations by January 2028.

Aiming to address the increased fire risks brought on by container ships and the misdeclaration of hazardous goods.

“My understanding is that IMO’s wish or requirement is that safety players like Consilium should embrace digitalisation a bit more on board,” says Ernfridsson.

The revolutionary TMS technology

At the heart of Consilium Safety Group’s response to this call is the strategic acquisition of Radicos, a vanguard in linear heat detection.

The acquisition has birthed the innovation of a Temperature Monitoring System (TMS), a product formerly under Radicos before its rebranding and integration into Consilium’s fire, flame, and gas safety solutions.

TMS represents a fundamental shift in how fire safety is approached at sea.

Leveraging a sophisticated network of sensors to monitor for the slightest anomalies in temperature that could indicate a possible fire.

Promises early detection of fire risks, potentially saving lives, cargo, and ships from disaster.

“This solution allows quick tracing if for instance, one container is at 18 degrees Celsius, and the adjacent one is 35 degrees Celsius.

“Using our safety management system software, SMiG, operators receive valuable information when a conflicting pattern is identified.

“With this solution, incidents are detected in an early stage, even at ambient temperatures.

It’s a true game-changer for safety within the container shipping industry”, highlights Thobias Ernfridsson.

The robustness of the system is further underlined by real-world testing.

It has been rigorously tested in harsh environments, including various stressors such as saltwater exposure, vibrations, wind and temperature variations.

The technology has proven to be highly reliable and effective in the most demanding maritime conditions.

With a new round of real-world trials planned for early 2025, and the first ship deliveries and installations expected later that summer, the anticipation within the marine community is palpable.

“It is in everyone’s interest to bring this product to market as quickly as possible.

“We have listened to our customers, insurers, and the authorities.

“Based on this, we have developed this outstanding product,” says Ernfridsson, reflecting a sentiment that goes beyond commercial interests and touches on collective responsibility for safety at sea.

“Simply said, there won’t be as many fires, everyone will be happy”, he concludes.

The expansive potential of TMS

The potential applications for TMS extend far beyond container ships, with interest from sectors ranging from car carriers such as RoRo ships to agriculture.

 “This technology is unique,” says Marcus Andersson, CCO at Consilium, “and its ability to monitor temperature changes has a wide range of applications, from detecting heat increases in cars on a car deck to monitoring the well-being of livestock.”

He explains:  “It was our customers who led us to expand our vision,” Andersson reveals, his voice a testament to the collaborative spirit that drives this innovation.

“They nudged us to see beyond the immediate. And now, car carriers are on the horizon.

“It´s not every day you hear enthusiasm for monitoring heat variations below cars at a car deck, but here we are, in dialogue with shipping companies”.

Our conversation takes an unexpected detour through the countryside, to a chicken farm, where the potential of TMS to save lives takes on another dimension.

“Imagine hanging a cable, a simple act, and suddenly you’re not just monitoring chickens, you’re actively protecting them.

“The rollout of TMS will be methodical, phased, and sensitive to the ecosystems it enters.

“We start with containers and car carriers, yes, but it’s about the order of things,” Andersson explains.

“The fire alarm, the gas alarm, and then this – our solution.

“It’s a sequence designed not just for implementation, but for integration, to become a support system that is as seamless as it is essential”.

Talking to Marcus Andersson, the essence of TMS as more than just a product but a solution comes to the fore.

It’s a technology born from the need to solve a critical problem that expands its embrace to offer protection and peace of mind.

“We can act as a supplier with support. We want to be close to our customers, to meet their challenges, which is why this was created,” he says, summing up the essence of their mission.

 ”We’re not just engineers and salespeople, we’re partners in safety, wherever that journey might lead us”, Andersson concludes.

TMS technology in brief

Basic concept

Imagine the TMS as a highly sensitive digital thermometer spread throughout a ship, constantly checking the temperature of every container on board.

This system is like a network of watchful eyes, designed to notice even the smallest rise in temperature that could indicate a fire risk.

How it works

The system uses a series of advanced sensors placed around the ship in direct proximity of the containers.

These sensors continuously monitor temperatures and send this data to a central system that execute advanced energy flow analysis onboard the ship.

It’s akin to having a network of smoke detectors, but instead of detecting smoke, they’re looking for unusual heat.

Detection and response

Should one container get warmer than usual, perhaps due to a malfunctioning electronic device, a battery or a chemical reaction, the TMS quickly spots this temperature anomaly.

The system then alerts the ship’s crew to the exact location of the potential hazard, allowing them to take immediate action, such as investigating the issue or initiating firefighting measures, long before a small problem turns into a major fire.

Integration with existing systems

TMS isn’t a standalone service; it’s integrated with the ship’s overall safety management system.

This means it works in harmony with other safety measures onboard, like fire extinguishers and alarms, to provide a comprehensive safety net.

Benefits beyond early detection

The true game-changer of this system lies not just in detecting potential fires but in its ability to provide peace of mind.

For ship operators, it means reducing the risk of losing cargo or, more importantly, risking lives.

For insurance companies, it’s about lowering the chances of costly disasters.

And for the global economy, it ensures that the goods we rely on every day make it safely across the seas.

This article was originally published in the August 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Fire safety issues persist in European ship inspections despite lower detention rates

Report highlights ongoing fire safety issues

The proportion of ships detained after inspections by European port authorities fell from a 10-year high in 2023 but familiar failings continued, according to a new report.

Fire safety, electrical issues and seafarer welfare remained among the top reasons for detaining ships by the 27 states that are part of the Paris MoU agreement, as reported by Trade Winds.

The detention rate of ships inspected in 2023 was 3.81%, down from 4.25% the previous year.

However, it was still above the pre-COVID-19 rates in 2019 when it dipped below 3%.

Performance of ship flags

The four lowest-ranked flags all performed worse in 2023 compared to the previous year.

The highest number of detentions per inspection was recorded by Cameroon (35%), followed by Tanzania (34%), Comoros (22%), and Vanuatu (18%).

A higher proportion of livestock carriers and general cargo ships were detained than other ship types.

In 2022, Moldova-flagged vessels had the highest proportion of detentions, with 31% of inspected ships being detained.

Criticism of maritime sector players

The Paris MoU leadership in last year’s report criticised shipowners, flag states, and recognised organisations for not doing enough to ensure good quality shipping.

The report noted the “minimal improvement” in 2023 and stated that it would continue to monitor developments closely this year.

It emphasised the expectation for all players in the maritime sector to “take the measures necessary to guarantee safe and environment-friendly shipping, with adequate working and living conditions on board”.

Background on the Paris MoU

The Paris MoU is one of 10 port state control regimes worldwide.

Its membership includes 26 European coastal states and Canada.

The organisation focuses on the safety and environmental standards of ships to ensure they meet international regulations.

Global marine fire safety system market to reach USD 159.1 billion by 2032

Market growth driven by advanced fire safety technologies and crew training

The global marine fire safety system market is projected to expand from USD 86.05 billion in 2023 to USD 159.1 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 6.1% during the forecast period of 2024–2032, as reported by Industry Today.

This growth is attributed to the increasing demand for advanced fire detection and suppression technologies in maritime operations.

The emphasis on crew training and competency development is also a key factor propelling the market, with shipowners and operators recognising the importance of well-trained personnel in effectively responding to fire emergencies and reducing risks to life and property.

Environmental sustainability and regulatory compliance are significant factors fuelling the market.

With rising scrutiny on the environmental impact of traditional firefighting agents, there is an increasing demand for alternative solutions that minimise ecological harm while maintaining fire safety efficacy.

Impact of artificial intelligence on marine fire safety systems

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming fire safety measures in the maritime industry.

By integrating AI-powered systems, vessels can proactively detect potential fire risks, analyse complex data patterns, and execute swift responses to enhance safety.

AI algorithms facilitate predictive modelling, allowing maritime authorities and ship operators to forecast fire occurrences based on historical data, environmental conditions, and vessel-specific parameters.

AI-driven solutions also optimise resource allocation by autonomously directing firefighting efforts and deploying extinguishing agents precisely where needed.

This advanced technology is revolutionising how vessels mitigate and prevent fire hazards, providing a significant boost to safety measures on board.

Major drivers and existing restraints in the market

The increasing globalisation and international trade within the maritime industry are primary drivers of the market.

The expansion of maritime activities in key shipping routes and ports worldwide is expected to drive the adoption of advanced fire prevention and suppression technologies to protect valuable assets and ensure uninterrupted trade operations.

Additionally, concerns over onboard safety and the protection of human lives are fuelling the market.

With passenger vessels, cruise ships, and ferries accommodating large numbers of travellers, safety remains paramount, prompting investments in cutting-edge fire detection and suppression technologies.

However, the complexity and cost of implementing advanced marine fire safety systems pose significant restraints.

The high initial investment required for installing and maintaining sophisticated fire detection, suppression, and control equipment deters small and medium-sized vessel owners from upgrading their safety systems.

Furthermore, environmental concerns over traditional fire suppression agents limit the market due to regulatory restrictions and international agreements aimed at phasing out ozone-depleting substances and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Emerging opportunities and regional outlook

The rapid digitalisation and automation of maritime operations are creating lucrative opportunities for the integration of AI and machine learning (ML) technologies in the market.

AI-powered predictive analytics enable ships to anticipate fire hazards based on real-time data insights, allowing for proactive risk mitigation measures and reducing the likelihood of catastrophic incidents.

The rising demand for autonomous and unmanned vessels also presents new opportunities, with AI-powered fire detection and suppression systems, including autonomous firefighting drones and robotic devices, offering scalable and efficient solutions for mitigating fire risks in unmanned operations.

Regionally, North America held a major market share in 2023 due to stringent regulatory frameworks and the presence of prominent maritime industry players investing in advanced fire safety technologies.

The robust maritime infrastructure in North America, coupled with a strong focus on safety and compliance standards, is driving the adoption of sophisticated fire detection and suppression systems across various vessel types.

The Asia Pacific region is projected to experience significant growth due to robust economic development, increasing trade activities, and investments in port infrastructure across countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore.

The region’s focus on enhancing safety standards and regulatory compliance in maritime operations, along with rising awareness of the importance of fire safety measures, is expected to drive the demand for advanced fire detection and suppression technologies.

Survitec highlights increase in ship fire safety deficiencies

Increase in fire safety deficiencies reported

Global Survival Technology solutions provider Survitec has highlighted the dangers of inadequate maintenance, testing, and inspection of ship fire safety systems in a new white paper.

The paper points to an alarming increase in fire-safety-related deficiencies found during Port State Control Inspections and subsequent ship detentions, as reported by Survitec.

The white paper, released at the Posidonia tradeshow, emphasises that fire continues to be a leading cause of major shipping incidents, accounting for over 20% of total losses and the most expensive cause of marine insurance claims.

In 2022, the Paris MoU recorded the highest level of fire safety deficiencies in a decade, and the Tokyo MoU reported an increase in detentions, with 15,562 deficiencies in 2023.

Economic downturn impacting fire safety standards

Survitec has found that the economic downturn and the emphasis on cost reduction post-COVID have negatively impacted fire safety.

Some shipowners and operators are maintaining and inspecting safety equipment themselves to save costs.

Metkel Yohannes, Director of Service & Rental Solutions at Survitec, said: “We’re finding basic errors and oversights that do not become apparent until either the ship fails an inspection and is detained – or there is a fire.”

He cited an example where a crew installed a new foam pump but forgot to remove a protective cap, causing a blockage.

Disparity in service quality and use of incorrect parts

Survitec also finds issues with the quality of parts used and the service quality between providers.

In CO2 firefighting systems, for example, hydraulic hoses are often mistaken for high-pressure hoses, which can burst under pressure.

Yohannes noted: “We see evidence of a slip in standards regarding basic safety practices but also a wide disparity in service quality between service providers.

“Approval stamps are being applied to fire systems and appliances that would or should not pass inspection.”

New fire risks with alternative fuels

The white paper highlights an incident involving a bulk carrier where a fire broke out shortly after leaving port, despite the vessel having passed a fire safety inspection.

Over half of the CO2 cylinders failed to activate, causing significant damage and resulting in repair costs estimated between $2-3 million USD.

Yohannes commented: “The development and introduction of alternative fuels, including the use and transportation of lithium-ion batteries, brings new fire risks and safety challenges that can’t be ignored.

“Fire systems and equipment must be maintained and tested as mandated by SOLAS, the IMO and the FSS code.”

Survitec launches containment device for valve actuator safety

Survitec unveils new safety device

Survitec has introduced a new energy containment safety device designed to mitigate risks associated with catastrophic valve actuator failures.

High-pressure spring-loaded actuator failures can cause severe injury or death and significant damage to equipment and facilities.

Regular inspection and maintenance are often neglected, and the risks have not received much technological or regulatory attention.

Features of the Survitec Gauntlet

The Survitec Gauntlet is compatible with all valve actuator types.

It is a protective sleeve made from lightweight para-aramid armouring, which is ten times as strong as steel.

This design aims to contain the forces unleashed during a failure.

Lloyd’s Register has technically qualified the Survitec Gauntlet, providing immediate containment protection and enhancing safety measures.

It adds minimal weight to the actuator, avoiding additional stress, and protects the actuator’s components from corrosion and degradation.

Market adoption and expert opinions

Survitec has supplied the Gauntlet to many operators, including major companies in the North Sea.

The company has also received an order from a Spanish oil and gas operator.

David Montgomery, Head of Sales at Survitec, said: “The introduction of the Gauntlet is a testament to our proactive stance on safety enhancement.

“The absence of detailed regulatory control pertaining to valve actuator failures or maintenance of this critical component is a pressing issue that demands immediate attention.

“We urge regulators to initiate further discussions and ask operators to act promptly to safeguard their personnel and critical plants in the event of an uncontained failure of an actuator.”

Addressing corrosion and aging issues

Valve actuator failures offshore often result from corrosion and the age of the units, with hundreds in service on each offshore installation.

Paul Gwynne, Sales & Contracts Manager at Survitec, highlighted: “The valve return spring sits in a pre-loaded or loaded condition and is powerful enough to close down the valve even during full operation.

“However, far too many of these actuators have been left to degrade. We are now seeing hundreds in an unsafe or unknown condition – which may be intensified by pneumatic and/or hydraulic control pressures and, therefore, a huge issue and possible danger to equipment and personnel.”

Gwynne added: “Many actuators have suffered significant corrosion of the unit’s internal workings, not only the exterior weather shield, which is visible.

“The problem can be compounded when these actuators are tagged as non-operational or decommissioned, no longer serviced but in place, but still containing a pre-load force in the spring, which can be equivalent to several tonnes depending on the size of the actuator.

“The force and impact of an actuator failure can be violent and often potentially fatal, impacting people, critical plants and even pipelines.”

Preplanning for ship incidents with Paul E. Calderwood

Structural fire fighting response to marine incidents (part 2) By Paul E. Calderwood, Calderwood Consulting International

[Part 1 can be found here]

In February 1989 there was a vessel fire in Wilmington Delaware on the MV Centaurus and the following issues and problems were identified by the fire department:

  • Inability to communicate with the crew
  • Lack of knowledge of vessel systems and arrangement
  • Lack of knowledge of the fire control plan
  • Logistic of managing large amounts of foam concentrate, including protecting the foam from freezing temperatures
  • Difficulty in recharging large numbers of radios and flashlights during a prolonged operation
  • Difficulty in dewatering and controlling pollution from contaminated runoff

These and many other issues and problems will be faced by fire fighters and the command staff at a vessel fire and with proper pre-fire planning many of these can be eliminated or reduced.

All fires to a fire fighter can be a life and death situation, but with shipboard firefighting there is a heightened level of risk due to the unknowns.

Use of 30-minute air tanks may be only enough to get you to the fire but not able to exit from a lower deck or engine room.

There are a number of MIRT (Marine Incident Response Teams) Teams formed in the US today.

The make-up of these teams includes port area fire departments, USCG, special experts like marine architects and marine chemist and other agencies and departments that would be called upon to respond to a vessel fire.

These teams are used also to provide training and drills prior to actual events but it gives the responders the opportunity to meet each other and iron out any problems in a non-emergency situation.

Mutual aid training of fire fighters is an area of planning that will need extensive work to accomplish.

Every fire department is faced with legally mandated training, much of which is required to be repeated annually.

Finding the time, the vessels, competent instructors and a safe location to hold training is needed and not easy to do.

The basic training of fire fighters for responding to a shipboard fire is roughly 16 – 24 hours.

Now you have to factor in the typical day in the life of a fire fighter, shift starts at 8am, equipment checks and housework until 9am, training from 9-9:30 until lunch.

After lunch class could start around 1:30 until 5 pm, so in one day with breaks and lunch you will get about 6 hours’ worth of training in; unless there is a fire or a medical call.

Depending on fire department work schedules, vacation schedules, sick days and injuries it could take months to get everyone through just the basic training.

The hands-on training can be organized through multi-departmental drills with assistance from the shipping companies and the US Coast Guard.

The one item that can be pointed to as a problem at every fire that has not gone right is communications.

The command staff of a vessel fire should already be aware that they will have communications problems, especially trying to communicate with the fire attack teams below deck.

The comment about being able to communicate in any type of building can also be any type of vessel.

The steel construction of a vessel is going to cause problems on many levels but especially with communications.

During practical drills in Everett we have found that a standard portable radio can reach 2-3 decks below the main deck near a stairwell.

The use of radio relays or using the ship’s communications systems may be the only way to get messages back and forth.

A secondary issue of communications comes from the ability of the OIC to communicate in a common language.

The terminology of the marine environment and ships system is complicated; if an OIC has no idea what a ship’s crew member is talking about it is doubtful that he will go along with it.

During port calls, many of the ship’s crewmembers may be on shore leave and will be unavailable to assist in the emergency and with a language barrier it will be difficult to ascertain who is accounted for or missing.

A M.I.R.T. is a group of training individuals from the many different agencies and departments in the area that have practiced together and responded to actual incidents.

Special experts like marine architects, marine chemists and vessel stability are vital to have on scene throughout the event.

The M.I.R.T. team concept can help bridge the gaps that are left from the lack of training.

These experts can help OIC’s in developing attack plans that can actually keep fire fighters above deck and not have to enter spaces that can be attacked using ship systems.

The use of some indirect attack methods, like flooding a space with CO2, can help buy time for the OIC to arrange for further support and resources.

There are similarities in the basic construction and layouts but being familiar with a vessel will make a difference when an actual event occurs.

Training can be upgraded to practice drills where fire fighters board a vessel in turnout gear and simulate fire conditions, advance lines, do search and rescue, patient removals and systems operations.

Through the use of drills on actual vessels fire fighters will gain a working knowledge of how to operate on a vessel, how to find their way around the different decks and how to communicate.

The simple task of walking onto the ship, across the main deck and then down 4-5 decks to a smoke-filled engine room is not something an average fire fighter can physically do.

The command staff needs to know how to organize the attack on a fire and how to set up an accountability system to track all fire fighters and crew members.

The pre-fire planning that is needed in a port community needs to address all the different types of vessels that dock there.

Based on the different types of vessel the plan can be generic for all vessels or it may have to be specific to each type of vessel due to the size or hazards associated with the vessel.

In the back of the NFPA 1405 Guide there are generic forms that can be used to start your planning; the intent of the forms is to have a memory jogger that will assist the incident commander that is first assigned to the vessel fire to gather important information that can and will change during the course of the fire.

These changes need to be monitored but without a good base line to start with the changes may not seem to be as serious as they really are.

Things like the depth of the vessel in the water and any listing of the vessel to one side are important to note.

Accountability was one area that needs to be assigned to an officer at the beginning of the incident.

When coordinating the efforts of hundreds of fire fighters and the alphabet soup of local, state and federal agencies, there has to be a detailed method of accounting for everyone, especially those entering into the hot zones.

Control and check points need to be established at the vessel entrances and members need to check in when boarding and check out when leaving the vessel.

A secondary check point is also needed at the point where fire fighters are actually entering into the vessel to attack the fire.

The time they enter, and their air bottle pressure should be written down and an estimated time of return and their destination.

If the crew does not return within the given time period and is unable to be contacted the rapid intervention team should be sent in to search for them.

Crews can easily become disorientated below deck and travel to another exit point, but they should always contact the checkpoint where they entered to notify them that the team has exited the interior of the vessel safely.

If your department could be called on to respond to any type of vessel fire, please take the time and get the proper training to be able to safely and professionally respond and mitigate the situations.

I dedicate this article to Firefighter Augusto Acabou and Firefighter Wayne Brooks Jr., may they both Rest In Peace.

Contact me regarding available training programs in the US and International locations: dchiefpaul@aol.com

This article was originally published in the May 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Fire Protection Research Foundation to host webinar on marine transport safety of energy storage systems

Fire safety in marine transportation of energy storage systems highlighted in upcoming webinar

The Fire Protection Research Foundation (FPRF) is set to host an insightful webinar on the marine transportation of energy storage systems (ESS) titled “Hazard Assessment and Regulatory Analysis”.

This event, part of the 2024 FPRF webinar series, will take place on April 29, from 11:00 am to 12:30 pm ET.

Participants are encouraged to register via the NFPA’s dedicated link.

This session will focus on enhancing understanding of the risks associated with transporting ESS by sea, a practice increasing due to the global manufacturing and distribution of these systems.

Details of the webinar

Energy storage systems, which store renewable energy for later use, often require transportation across oceans due to international manufacturing.

The webinar will address the unique challenges posed by large-scale ESS during marine transport, such as safety and regulatory compliance.

A study by Transport Canada, conducted by the FPRF, will be presented, detailing new insights and recommendations for safe transportation practices and regulatory adherence.

This is crucial for ensuring the safety of ESS in the confined and resource-limited environments of marine vessels.

Support and sponsorship

The 2024 Fire Protection Research Foundation webinar series has garnered support from several key industry stakeholders.

Sponsors include the American Wood Council, AXA XL Risk Consulting, Johnson Controls, Inc., Telgian Engineering and Consulting LLC, and Zurich Resilience Solutions.

Their involvement underscores the significance of collaborative efforts in advancing safety standards in energy storage and transportation sectors.

Foreign flagged vessels continue to face detention in UK ports due to safety failures

Detention of foreign ships in UK highlights ongoing safety concerns

In March 2024, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) reported the detention of foreign flagged ships in UK ports for failing to meet the safety standards required by the Paris MOU Port State Control.

A total of three new detentions were recorded during the month, with two vessels still under detention as the month concluded.

This ongoing issue highlights critical safety lapses that could potentially jeopardize maritime operations and crew welfare.

Details from the latest detention report

According to the MCA, significant deficiencies were found in emergency power sources and fire safety systems on these vessels.

For instance, the SUDE-S, flagged by Malta, was detained due to inoperative emergency generators and inadequate fire extinguishing installations, leading to its release after three days following corrections.

Another vessel, EEMS SERVANT from the Netherlands, showcased more extensive issues with 22 deficiencies including ineffective crew performance evaluations and poor emergency system familiarity, taking approximately two weeks for release post-detention.

Patterns of non-compliance and enforcement

The detention list includes various ships such as the TRUFFALDINO, flagged by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and the GUNDEM AZRA from Panama, both demonstrating non-compliance in multiple safety aspects.

Notably, issues ranged from inoperative fire detection systems to outdated navigational charts and life-saving appliances, reflecting a broader problem of adherence to international maritime safety norms.

MCA’s role and the impact of these detentions

Enforcement by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency

As part of its commitment to enhancing maritime safety, the MCA conducts rigorous inspections to ensure that vessels comply with international standards.

These measures are crucial for preventing potential accidents and environmental hazards, thus maintaining the integrity of marine operations within UK waters.

International cooperation and database utility

The MCA utilises the THETIS database, which centralises information on ships inspected under the Paris MOU.

This system helps in identifying high-risk vessels and prioritising them for inspections, thereby efficiently managing resources to address the most significant threats to maritime safety.

IFSJ Comment

The continued detention of vessels for failing safety inspections underlines the critical need for stringent enforcement of maritime laws.

The MCA’s efforts are essential in ensuring that such deficiencies are addressed promptly to prevent accidents and protect marine environments.

Moreover, the detailed reporting and transparency in handling these detentions reflect the UK’s commitment to upholding high safety standards, serving as a model for maritime authorities worldwide.

Dockside Dangers: Structural firefighting response to marine incidents

By Paul E. Calderwood, Calderwood Consulting International

I have been following the tragic story for the past few months from Newark NJ where on July 5, 2023 around 9:30 pm.

The Newark Fire Department was notified about a fire on the Grande Costa d’Avorio.

The ship was loaded with 1200 junk cars and a fire broke out during the loading process on deck level 10.

During the fire attack two firefighters called a “may-day” and they were found removed from the ship and succumbed to their injures.

For over 40 years I have advocating for more and better training for structural firefighters on responding to and handing fires on marine vessels, the reason for this article.

In 1986 I was hired as firefighter with the Everett (MA) Fire Department and having grown up there I knew about the city, its industry and its people but what I did not know about was the number of vessels that came into the port of Everett.

Everett is on the north side of the Boston Harbor and the home of Exxon Oil Company and Distrigas large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facility.

The department had not had a major incident with any of the vessels that docked there so there were no plans in place to respond to an incident involving a vessel.

In 1990 the US Coast Guard was in the process of putting into place the OPA 90 regulations regarding vessel pollution safety.

The plans called for the oil companies to have plans in place for a pollution related incident and I moved forward to expand these plans to also include fires and other emergencies.

Shortly thereafter, the Port Emergency Planning Committee was formed for Boston Harbor to help develop plans for vessel incidents.

The plans included equipment, communications, response capabilities, and training.

In the introduction of the 1996 NFPA 1405 guide there is a comment made by the committee that expresses what every firefighter should understand regarding vessels.

“The tactics and strategies utilised to attack a fire aboard a vessel are in many ways similar to those used routinely in attacking structure fires.

However, there are many aspects of marine fire fighting that warrant special attention because of the unique environment encountered aboard a vessel.”.

The lack of pre-planning and training of firefighters can and possibly will result in the serious injury or death to firefighters.

The Texas City explosion

Thinking about the background of the problem of shipboard fire fighting the best place to start is with the Texas City Explosion of 1947.

The morning of April 16, 1947, a morning that many must have thought was the end of the world, and for some people it did become the end of their world.

A ship in the Texas City harbor, the Grand Camp, bearing a cargo of ammonium nitrate fertiliser destined for Europe caught fire.

The fire department was on the scene trying to put out the fire, and a crowd of people (many children) had gathered to watch the firefighters.

The bright orange color that came out of the black smoke seemed to catch everyone’s attention.

The crowd must not have known that ammonium nitrate is highly explosive, or they didn’t know what was in the cargo hold of the ship.

The standard plan for towing a dangerously burning ship from the harbor was not implemented until it was too late, and the tugboat didn’t arrive in time to prevent what happened next.

A little after 9:00 a.m.

the Texas City Disaster, as it is often referred to, happened as the Grand Camp exploded.

Throughout the night, fear mounted because another freighter, the High Flyer, which was also loaded with ammonium nitrate as well as sulfur, had also been burning all day.

Tugs had tried in vain to tow her out of the ruined harbor.

At 1:00 a.m. on April 17, everyone was ordered away from the area.

At 1:10 a.m. the High Flyer exploded in the most violent of all the blasts, taking with her another ship, the Wilson B. Keene.

It also destroyed a concrete warehouse and a grain elevator and triggered even more fires.

Almost the entire fire department had been lost in the first explosion, along with plant workers, dockworkers, school children, and other bystanders.

Windows rattled in Baytown and a fine mist of black oil rained in Galveston. The losses from the disaster were unprecedented.

Nearly 600 deaths in a town of about 16,000 is a terrible toll. It is impossible to arrive at an exact figure because many bodies were never recovered.

The loss of these three vessels and the devastation to the city was nothing compared to the loss of the fire department from one incident where the department was obviously not prepared or trained to handle a vessel fire.

I wish I could say that because of this incident that the fire service has learned and today has changed its ways but I that found that it is not true.

Many port fire departments still do not have a written plan for what they will do when faced with a fire of this same magnitude.

Coast Guard response

Presently many departments are still of the belief that when there is a fire on a vessel that they respond to that they will fight it as if it was a fire in any other structure or that they will contact the United States Coast Guard and they will respond and handle the situation.

The USCG has changed their response mode to vessel fires and the official response from the Coast Guard is: “Generally, Coast Guard personnel shall not directly engage in fire fighting activities on other than Coast Guard units except when necessary to save a life or when possible to avert a significant threat with minimal risk to Coast Guard personnel…

“During marine fire-fighting situations involving vessels or waterfront facilities, Commanding Officers of Coast Guard units shall adopt a conservative response posture, and shall focus their actions on those traditional Coast Guard activities listed above not requiring unit personnel to enter into a hazardous environment or be unduly tasked….

“Coast Guard personnel shall not engage in independent fire-fighting operations, except to save a life or in the early stages of a fire to avert a significant threat without undue risk.”

The problem faced by the many fire departments is that they feel that they cannot train all their personnel on the hazards of the vessels and what the potential incidents could be.

A coordinated effort of multiple departments and agencies is needed to attack and control a vessel fire. This also means the use of mutual aid fire departments.

A department has to recognised that a vessel fire in their city is a problem to our department and our city, how do we explain to the chief and mayors of the surrounding cities and towns that their firefighters need the same level of training as we do.

During a large-scale incident there could be multiple mutual aid companies at the scene and if these firefighters have not been properly trained, how can they be used by the OIC in the fire attack?

An OIC can use untrained firefighter to provide water supply, air bottle movement and general assistance and assign the actual fire attack to those members with the specialised training, like the way we handle hazardous materials responses.

Levels of training

The NFPA Standard 1405, entitled “Guide for Land-based Firefighters Who Respond to Marine Vessel Fires” 1996 edition, has become the basic guide for departments in the development of preplans.

In the introduction of the NFPA 1405 guide there is a comment made by the committee that expresses what every firefighter should understand regarding vessel: “The tactics and strategies utilised to attack a fire aboard a vessel are in many ways similar to those used routinely in attacking structure fires.

“However, there are many aspects of marine fire fighting that warrant special attention because of the unique environment encountered aboard a vessel.”

The IFSTA Manual for Marine Fire Fighting for Land Based Firefighters describes the levels of training the fire department should have:

Awareness Level: Firefighters trained to the awareness level will have general knowledge of safety issues related to the marine environment and unique environmental factors and their impact on shipboard fire fighting.

Operations Level: Shipboard firefighters trained to the operations level will understand the actions necessary to ensure their personal safety.

Technician Level: Shipboard firefighters trained to the technician level will have an understanding of the hazards found in the marine environment and their influences on shipboard fire fighting operations.

Training, training and training are the three most important aspects that a fire department should be involved with to prepare their members.

With proper training the faster and safer an incident can be mitigated with less probability of firefighter injuries or deaths.

Incident Command training is also needed because more technical areas need to be covered like the operation of ship systems like ventilation and suppression systems is vital.

This article was originally published in the April 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

This is part one of two. Part two was published in the May issue of International Fire and Safety Journal. Read part two here.

Survitec achieves ISO 23678 certification to enhance maritime safety

Survitec’s milestone in maritime safety

Survitec, a leading provider of Survival Technology solutions, has achieved the ISO 23678:2022 1-4 certification, positioning itself at the forefront of maritime safety.

This certification, introduced in 2022, sets a global standard for the training of personnel involved in lifeboat inspections, aligning with the requirements of resolution MSC.402(96).

Additionally, this achievement has played a crucial role in Survitec receiving renewed approval for the maintenance, inspection, and testing of lifeboats under Lloyd’s Register (LR) classification.

The impact on safety and training

Matt Macfarlane, Head of Service Operations at Survitec, highlighted the significance of this certification: “By adhering to the stringent principles incorporated into the ISO 23678 standard, we have significantly broadened our scope of certification, enabling qualified and certified technicians to inspect, maintain and test an increasingly extensive range of equipment supplied by an array of different manufacturers.

“Survitec’s achievement ensures customers receive a top-tier service backed by rigorous standards and a commitment to multi-brand service excellence with unmatched authorisations and accreditations from over 70 flag States.”

Advancements in technician competence and assurance

Survitec’s Marine Training Academy (MTA) has also successfully received certification to the new ISO training standard, further demonstrating the company’s commitment to enhancing maritime safety.

In tandem, Survitec developed a dynamic database tool to track technician competence, ensuring compliance with certification requirements and aligning with audit standards.

Paul Watkins, Survitec’s Regulatory & Compliance Manager, said: “We are delighted to have received this certification as ISO 23678 delivers greater assurance to classification surveyors and flag States and reinforces our commitment to delivering a high-quality service to all our customers.”

The call for wider adoption of ISO 23678

The certification not only marks a significant step for Survitec but also sets a precedent for the maritime industry.

Macfarlane emphasized the potential impact of widespread adoption: “The ISO standard has the potential to significantly improve maritime safety globally through the standardised certification of service technicians.

“As the largest company to achieve this standard, we see great benefit to the industry, and we call on regulators to adopt it to significantly enhance safety standards.”

IFSJ Comment

The achievement of ISO 23678 certification by Survitec demonstrates a commitment to the highest standards of safety and training, serving as a benchmark for others in the sector.

This certification not only enhances Survitec’s ability to provide exceptional service across a broad range of equipment but also reinforces the importance of standardized training and certification in improving global maritime safety.

The call for broader adoption of the ISO 23678 standard underscores a collective responsibility towards enhancing safety practices, potentially transforming the landscape of maritime safety worldwide.