New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has reported that Pacific Door Systems Limited (PDS) has begun a voluntary recall of certain fire doors following concerns over asbestos contamination.
Asbestos awareness for emergency responders
With over 20 years in asbestos health, Samantha Collins, Principal Examiner (Asbestos), British Occupational Hygiene Society, discusses the unseen risks firefighting personnel face in asbestos exposure
I consider myself very lucky to have no real experience of the fire sector.
I have of course always been aware of the dangers firefighting personnel must face.
As an occupational hygienist with some health and safety experience, I can probably recognise some of the slightly less obvious issues such as smoke and soot inhalation, exposure to extreme temperatures and the risks of working in high-stress environments.
What I am ashamed to say, however, is that despite having worked within the asbestos industry for 20-plus years, asbestos exposure to firefighting personnel has never been at the forefront of my mind, possibly due to several reasons.
The first is that the ‘immediate risks’ to firefighter’s health and safety were always the ones I thought of first.
The second is that I always imagined the PPE, RPE and decontamination procedures within the emergency services to be of such a high standard that exposure to various ‘nasties’ would be almost non-existent, and finally, as an industry with the HSE as our regulator, we are primarily focussed on the exposure risk in ‘tradespeople’ and members of the public more so than emergency responders.
Recent press releases and campaigns, news articles and reports have all predominantly centred around the risk of asbestos in schools, hospitals and government buildings and there are more training courses marketed for electricians, plumbers, property maintenance workers etc than you can shake a stick at.
But what is this ‘asbestos’ and could we be doing more about it for the fire industry?
Understanding the risks
Asbestos, from a Greek word meaning “inextinguishable” is the name given to a group of ‘naturally occurring fibrous silicate minerals’ formed over time throughout the Earth’s crust.
The mineralogy of asbestos formation is somewhat complex and requires quite specific circumstances influenced by local geology and environmental conditions.
Asbestos was first reportedly discovered by the ancient Greeks and Romans and appears in early texts written by the Greek geographer and philosopher Strabo (64/63 BC – 24 AD) and the Roman naturalist ‘Pliny the Elder’ (AD 23/24 – AD 79).
Following its initial discovery, we quickly recognised the ‘magic’ properties of these asbestos minerals, notably their high resistance to fire and excessive heat, and its historical use has been found in many countries around the world used to strengthen clay cooking pots, form lamp and candle wicks, woven into fireproof tablecloths and interestingly even cremation blankets because the blanket itself didn’t burn and could contain the deceased’s ashes for easy separation from the rest of the funeral pyre.
Closer to home during the Industrial Revolution, the expansion of Britain’s global trading empire and the threat of a second World War, the use of asbestos in the UK became more widespread, particularly in the aftermath of WWII when several political changes resulted in increased demand for schools, hospitals and government buildings, and a general desire of the country to get back on its’ feet.
Cheap and readily available
There are reportedly more than 200 different types of asbestos mineral globally, however, due to various reasons, including how abundant they were and how commercially viable they were to extract, only 6 types tend to be ‘regulated’ in the UK.
These are Chrysotile, Crocidolite, Amosite (more often known by their colours as white, blue and brown respectively) and the slightly rarer types of Fibrous Anthophyllite, Tremolite and Actinolite.
The concept of new construction and engineering materials which were strong, cheap, readily available and more importantly said to ‘save lives’ through fire protection, meant demand and importation of asbestos fibre and the production of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) skyrocketed.
ACMs quickly found their way into various installations around the country with the number of imports increasing steadily from the late 1930s, peaking in the 1970s and only finally reducing throughout the 80s and 90s when awareness of the health risks associated with asbestos exposure began to expand until asbestos was finally banned in the UK in 1999.
It’s estimated that during the 20th Century over 6 million tonnes of asbestos were imported into the UK, mostly as ‘raw fibre’ direct from the mines of countries such as South Africa, Canada, Russia, Cyprus and Australia.
Often arriving by sea and distributed countrywide by road and rail, UK factories and processing plants produced a variety of different ACMs.
There are thought to be approximately 3600 different types of ACMs in the UK.
We have thermal insulation, fireproofing, firebreaks and ‘compartmentalisation’ materials, ‘sprayed coatings’, friction products such as clutch linings and brake pads, roofs and rainwater goods moulded from asbestos-containing cement, ‘Artex’ ceilings, floor tiles, toilet cisterns and even full woven asbestos firefighting suits at one point in time – the list goes on.
The ancient Greeks and Romans may have had conflicting ideas of what asbestos was and where it came from.
They were however in agreement that asbestos caused illness in human beings noting that workers involved in extracting the fibres from the ground or weaving them into cloths and ropes often developed ‘lung sickness’ and had short life expectancies.
Unfortunately, as advancements were made in medicine it became undeniable that asbestos exposure was a serious health concern.
Due to the unique fibrous shape of the minerals, the microscopic size of the fibres, their ability to become easily airborne when agitated, and their resistance to heat, acids and alkalis, once they enter the human body (usually via the respiratory system) they can remain in situ for decades without being broken down or removed by our body’s defences.
This can cause devastating damage including diseases and conditions such as lung cancer, asbestosis, pleural plaques, pleural effusions (lung fluid accumulation), pericardial effusions (build-up of fluid around the heart) and even laryngeal and ovarian cancers.
There is also the infamous ‘mesothelioma’ whereby inhaled fibres can migrate through the lung tissue, penetrate the lung wall and lodge themselves in the pleural lining on the outside of the lungs where they can trigger the growth of aggressive cancerous tumours.
Health impact of asbestos exposure
The frightening thing is that the effects of asbestos exposure and inhalation are not immediate; there is a ‘latency’ period of anything between 15 and 60 years depending on the source of the information and asbestos is now firmly recognised by the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) as a Group 1 Human Carcinogen.
The current stance of the regulators in the UK is that if ACMs are not disturbed and the risk of any fibres being released and becoming airborne is mitigated, then ACMs should stay in place and be ‘managed’.
They are often still doing an important job of thermally insulating or fire-proofing structures and their removal could compromise structural integrity and/or cause unnecessary exposure to removal workers and the public.
There are issues with removal costs; who is liable for these costs, and what we should do with waste asbestos.
Currently, it’s buried at specialist landfill sites but many of these sites are now ‘full’ and ideas on dealing with asbestos waste in the future are limited.
Under the current Control of Asbestos Regulations (2012) Duty Holders are legally obliged to survey their properties for ACMs, keep a register of what and where they are and have a management plan to monitor condition and mitigate exposure.
In addition, we have legal training requirements stating anyone liable to disturb the ‘fabric’ of a building during their work must have a minimum of ‘asbestos awareness’ training to educate them in what different ACMs can look like, their different applications and how to avoid exposure.
There are also tight restrictions on knowingly working with asbestos including minimum RPE and PPE requirements, control measures to reduce fibre levels if disturbed and the all-important site and personnel decontamination.
Limitations of current safety protocols
Whether this system is working however is hotly debated both by industry leaders and politicians, with the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) Select Committee raising its concerns with the Government in 2021 about the usefulness of the regulations for managing asbestos, prompting a review on ‘effectiveness’ by the HSE.
The reason is that despite the legal requirements in place we still have more than 5000 people dying each year in the UK from asbestos-related disease.
So even with the regulations in place and a duty to Manage which has been in effect since 2004, we are still seeing many annual deaths, and this is mostly with our focus on managing asbestos in a controlled way within buildings which are intact or undergoing planned demolition.
Registers should be in place for contractors to reference before starting work; tradespeople are taught not to conduct any work without the correct information and we usually have the small luxury of time for planning and acting when it comes to ACMs in the form of training, data retrieval, method statements and risk assessments.
However, what do we do about emergencies, explosions, unplanned structural collapse, fire and dare I say terrorist attacks?
Of course, these are situations where something has the potential to end a life immediately which understandably takes precedence over some strange ‘fibrous rock’, exposure to which may or may not cause harm in the next 30 years, but should we be doing more when it comes to safeguarding firefighting personnel from this so-called ‘Magic Mineral’?
This article was originally published in the December 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal – to read your FREE digital copy, click here.
Asbestos under fire: What are the legacy risks of asbestos in building safety?
Chris Ivey, Director of UKATA, delves into the legacy risks of asbestos in building safety assessments and the vital need for comprehensive training
I was recently invited to dinner with my oldest friend from the dark days of school and among the other guests was his nephew, a doctor, who mentioned that he was moving into a flat with asbestos but had been told he could cover it up.
The sound of hooves could be heard for miles around as I climbed up onto my high horse and spent the next five minutes explaining the health risks, epidemiology of asbestos related illnesses and social impact associated with asbestos.
Sitting at the table with us were a town planner, two senior project managers and a surveyor, all of whom had completed degrees in the built environment but knew little or nothing of the problem.
It got me thinking, how is this sector of the construction industry protecting itself from asbestos?
A quick search of the internet found several stories about surveyors who had developed mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs, as a result of inadvertently being exposed to asbestos.
Asbestos has a long history, but significantly for the UK, its use post war was almost ubiquitous.
Firstly, it is important to understand that asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral, which due to its fibrous composition makes it ideal to be worked into a myriad of products.
It was also mined in many of what are now commonwealth countries, making it cheap and accessible to the UK as we rebuilt our cities, schools, factories, offices and homes after the war.
Flameproof, non-conducting, resistant to acid and alkali, resistant to heat up to 600-800 degrees and an excellent sound insulator, asbestos was the perfect material with which to re-build the UK’s infrastructure after 1945.
At our dinner, a lot of talk centred around the new Building Safety Act and the rush by building owners to ensure that their premises are up to standard.
There has long been a need for fire risk assessments for premises, and not all of those conducted since the introduction of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order have been up to scratch.
If any good can come out of the tragedy of Grenfell it will be that building owners and those responsible for the safety of occupants are far more aware of the need for competent people to carry out their fire risk assessments.
Good assessors aren’t merely filling out generic forms, they are looking at the fabric and construction of buildings to provide a better understanding of how a fire might start or spread.
One way to prevent or slow the spread of a fire and therefore allow safe evacuation is through compartmentation.
The objective of fire compartmentation is to prevent the spread of smoke, gases, and flames.
By subdividing the building with fire resisting construction, escape routes and high-risk or high-value areas are protected to ensure the safety of occupants and prevent extensive losses.
A suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment will typically involve a review of existing fire compartmentation measures through a sampling approach (walls, floors, voids, and shafts predominantly).
Sampling can indicate the presence of significant issues, such as locating or confirming the presence of fire dampers or establishing if existing measures meet the requirements of current guidance or other specific business resilience objectives.
If the building was constructed before 1999, what better way to provide protection from fire than by using a material that cannot be ignited and can withstand temperatures up to 800c, a material that can be mixed with others to provide flexible, malleable but strong products to provide or fireproof that compartmentation.
Asbestos containing materials, such as insulating boards, thermoplastic floor tiles, ropes, gaskets, etc were a perfect choice for compartmentation walls, ceilings and floors, and for filling gaps around service penetrations.
If a Fire Risk Assessor is therefore disturbing materials to ensure these fire breaks are in place, is it possible that they may be disturbing asbestos, and if so, are they placing themselves and occupiers at risk?
When the Control of Asbestos Regulations were introduced in 2012, they specifically included a requirement for employers to ensure that any employee liable to be exposed to asbestos must be given adequate information, instruction and training.
This is expanded on in the approved code of practice to the regulations (L143) and identifies fire alarm installers, architects, building surveyors and other such professionals as being required to attend “asbestos awareness” training, the only exception being where it can be demonstrated that work will only be carried out in or on premises free of ACMs.
Sadly, I have investigated too many incidents where work has been carried out in buildings where the operatives have been told that no asbestos was present, when in fact a survey had been misread or contained caveats unknown to the worker, and in most cases asbestos awareness training had not been attended.
The list of topics to be covered in asbestos awareness training set out in L143 is relatively short, however it seems ridiculous that you wouldn’t include guidance on how to interrogate an asbestos survey or register.
This is mandatory for any asbestos awareness training course accredited by the UK Asbestos Training Association (UKATA).
As a child of the 70s asbestos has been an ever-present spectre at the feast, from the derelict garage at my family home demolished by hand by my grandfather, to the lagging on the pipes in my classroom at college, so when I got the opportunity to learn more about it, I jumped at it.
Since then, I have been a passionate advocate for sharing that knowledge with everyone.
Knowledge is power, and everyone deserves the power to protect themselves.
So if, whilst carrying out your fire risk assessment, you are going to stick your head into a ceiling void, riser, undercroft or are going to disturb material installed before 1999, are you sure you know what you might find there, do you know what to check before you start work, do you have the knowledge to protect yourself?
Hopefully the irony of putting yourself unnecessarily at risk conducting an assessment won’t be lost on you.
UKATA, a leading association, is dedicated to enhancing the quality and standards of asbestos training with the aim to shield workers and the public from the hazards of asbestos exposure.
The association collaborates closely with its members to guarantee that they have access to the latest information, training resources, and industry updates.
They provide a suite of support services to assist them in accomplishing their training objectives.
Their membership encompasses a diverse array of organisations involved in asbestos training, including training providers, asbestos removal contractors, consultants, and equipment suppliers.
UKATA is fervent about promoting safe and responsible working practices, committed to working with members and partners to realise a shared vision of protecting workers and the public from the hazards linked with asbestos exposure.
This article was originally published in the July 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.
Calls for stronger UK asbestos safety actions amidst ongoing exposure risks
Urgent appeal for government action on asbestos
Two decades after the ban on asbestos, thousands in the UK remain at risk from exposure, according to the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH).
Ahead of Global Asbestos Awareness Week, IOSH has called for increased awareness and consistent management of asbestos, particularly in non-domestic buildings constructed before 1999.
An estimated 300,000 such buildings still contain asbestos, posing a significant health risk during refurbishments or retrofits aimed at achieving net zero targets.
Persistent risks and proposed solutions
Ruth Wilkinson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs at IOSH, emphasised the current dangers and the lack of progress in managing asbestos.
She noted: “We know that about 5,000 people a year die from asbestos-related diseases every year in the UK.
“While the cause of their illness was likely exposure from decades ago, we believe that people are still being exposed today.”
The Work and Pensions Committee’s proposal for a 40-year deadline for removing asbestos from all public and commercial buildings was rejected by the Government in July 2022, prompting calls for a combined effort to address the issue.
National strategy and educational initiatives needed
IOSH advocates for a national strategic plan to address asbestos, aligned with the built environment and net zero initiatives.
Such a plan would focus on the duty to manage asbestos and the competence of individuals, including the development of clear guidance and enforcement.
Ruth Wilkinson added: “Nearly two years have now passed and there hasn’t been any progress. Action is needed now. People’s lives depend on it.”
Enhanced training for employees to raise awareness of asbestos dangers is also deemed essential.
International support for asbestos awareness
Global Asbestos Awareness Week, now in its 20th year, seeks to correct misconceptions about asbestos and enhance public education.
Linda Reinstein, President and CEO of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, highlighted the collaborative efforts to combat asbestos exposure: “This Global Asbestos Awareness Week, as we join forces again with IOSH and BOHS and echo the calls for heightened asbestos awareness, we embody the very essence of collective action.”
IFSJ Comment
The continued presence of asbestos in thousands of UK buildings underscores the need for urgent governmental action and public awareness.
Despite the known risks, efforts to manage and remove asbestos lag behind, posing a direct threat to public health.
The call by IOSH for a cohesive national strategy and improved educational resources is a critical step towards mitigating this ongoing hazard.
Collaboration between government bodies, industry stakeholders, and international organizations like the ADAO can amplify the impact of such initiatives, ensuring a safer environment for future generations.
IAFF advocates for a nationwide asbestos ban in the US
The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) is backing a bill in the US aimed at implementing a nationwide ban on asbestos, hoping to reduce the asbestos-related deaths that affect dozens of fire fighters annually.
Fire fighters at greater risk due to asbestos exposure
Greg Russell, IAFF Governmental Affairs Representative, recently spoke at a congressional staff briefing on the proposed legislation.
He clarified that asbestos is a known carcinogen causing diseases such as mesothelioma and cancers of the lung, larynx, and ovaries.
It’s particularly concerning for fire fighters who often face exposure to airborne asbestos fibres in their line of duty.
Russell said: “Fire fighters are regularly exposed to airborne asbestos fibres as they respond to fires and other hazardous situations, making them 200 times more likely to develop related illnesses than the general public.”
He added that occupational cancers are now the leading cause of death among fire fighters.
To address this, the union is actively seeking solutions.
Recent events underline the urgency for an asbestos ban
Highlighting the seriousness of the issue, Russell shared an incident from Richmond, Indiana.
Fire fighters from the Richmond Local 1403 were called to a warehouse fire insulated with asbestos.
While they managed to control the fire quickly, it lingered for several days, causing prolonged asbestos exposure.
Following the fire, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identified asbestos particles on over 300 properties nearby.
Russell said: “The situation in Indiana illustrates why the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified firefighting as a Group 1 carcinogen.”
He urged lawmakers to prioritise the health and safety of fire fighters by adopting measures such as the proposed asbestos ban.
Global push for asbestos ban gains momentum
Currently, over 70 countries have prohibited the use of asbestos. Should the US pass the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act, it would ban the import, use, and sale of asbestos.
Additionally, industries working with asbestos would need to switch to non-asbestos technology, a transition seen as economically viable and eco-friendly.
The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, co-founded by Linda Reinstein, is leading a coalition in support of the bill.
Reinstein’s dedication stems from a personal tragedy, as her husband Alan succumbed to diseases caused by asbestos exposure.
She highlighted the significance of the legislation, mentioning that it aims to safeguard a broad spectrum of Americans, including vulnerable workers, first responders, and especially children.
IFSJ Comment
The support by IAFF for a nationwide asbestos ban sheds light on the pressing concern of asbestos-related health hazards, especially for fire fighters.
Exposure to this carcinogen has proven fatal for many, and the Richmond incident underscores the risk present in older structures insulated with asbestos.
With over 70 nations already enforcing a similar ban, the push for the U.S. to adopt this legislation is timely.
The move will not only protect the lives of our brave first responders but also benefit the broader community, reinforcing public health and safety standards.
About IAFF
The International Association of Fire Fighters, commonly known as IAFF, is an influential organisation dedicated to representing the interests of professional fire fighters and paramedics in the US and Canada.
They are committed to improving the working conditions of their members, promoting safety, and advocating for better community health and safety regulations.