Fire safety debate grows as more states allow single staircases

Fire safety staircase rules change in several US states

Several US states have changed building codes to allow some apartment buildings taller than three storeys to be built with a single staircase, replacing long-standing requirements for at least two staircases in most buildings above that height.

The New York Times reported that proponents say the change can reduce development costs by removing the need for a second stair and reducing the space required for common areas such as hallways between staircases, allowing buildings to be developed on smaller lots.

Stephen Smith, the executive director of the Center for Building in North America, said: “We’re seeing single-stair buildings on what were otherwise unbuildable small lots.”

“Allowing more cities to do this will help meet demand for housing,” Smith said.

Where the code changes have been adopted and studied

The article said Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Texas and Tennessee have approved code changes in the past two years allowing just one stairway, and Washington State is set to join them in July.

California, Hawaii, New York, Minnesota, Oregon and Virginia are conducting studies exploring the same change.

Colorado now allows a single staircase in buildings up to five storeys in Denver and 10 other cities with more than 100,000 residents, and Governor Jared Polis said: “We wanted lower costs, smaller footprints, more natural light.”

“It just allows for much more flexibility,” Polis said.

In Washington State, single staircases will be allowed in buildings up to six storeys, and State Senator Jesse Salomon said: “Single stairway is one significant avenue to promote infill – that’s the motivation.”

Fire service concerns and safety evidence cited in the report

Tom Pitschneider, the fire marshal in Shakopee, Minnesota, said there are “challenges in firefighter response to a single stair.”

“As we’re going up the same way as the residents are trying to escape, we need working space,” Pitschneider said.

“With a single stair, everybody’s working the same space, so you don’t have a way to take people out,” he said.

Alex Horowitz, the director of housing policy at the Pew Charitable Trusts, said design features such as sprinklers and fire-resistant materials have made apartment buildings built after World War II safer.

Horowitz said Pew examined 468 deaths between 2012 and 2024 in apartment buildings in New York City where fires had broken out, with three in buildings with a single staircase, and the study found those deaths were not caused by having fewer available staircases.

“A one-stair building has faster egress times because it has a smaller floor plate,” Horowitz said.

“Everyone is closer to the stair,” he said.

“And there are so many fewer residents to evacuate,” Horowitz added.

Pitschneider said safety concerns become more serious in rural areas where fire response times are longer or where fewer firefighting resources are available.

“The model works in a St. Paul, where they’re running multiple engines and they’re putting 12, 15, 18 firefighters on scene in that first 10 minutes,” Pitschneider said.

“What we’re not comfortable with is that model going to our outstate, smaller cities that are bringing three, four firefighters in that first 10 minutes of the firefight,” he said.

Why Massachusetts is revisiting single-stair fire safety rules now

Healey-Driscoll administration launches advisory group on single-stair fire safety rules

A new Massachusetts executive order will study allowing single-stair construction in some residential buildings above three storeys.

Governor Maura Healey and Lieutenant Governor Kim Driscoll announced the order on 13 February 2026.

The announcement described the current Massachusetts building code requirement for two exit stairs in buildings above three storeys or with long interior corridors.

The release said this requirement can make it harder to build mid-rise development on smaller parcels.

Driscoll said: “Building new housing that prioritizes affordability, enhancing the livability of our communities and keeping people safe couldn’t be more important as we respond to our housing shortage.”

“Our administration is spurring all kinds of housing production to meets the range of needs facing Massachusetts residents, so I’m eager for the advisory group to get started and study the feasibility of single stair construction while considering all possible safety risks.”

Advisory group remit and building code updates

The announcement said the Governor is establishing a technical advisory group to develop a process for evaluating whether, and under what conditions, single-stair multifamily residential buildings above three storeys can be safely permitted in Massachusetts.

The release said the group will include fire services, building officials, national architectural experts, accessibility advocates and public-safety professionals.

Its charge includes comparing single-stair and multi-stair buildings, identifying required fire and life safety precautions and recommending targeted updates to the State Building Code.

Housing and Livable Communities Secretary Ed Augustus said: “Every safe, evidence-based strategy to build more homes is needed to meet the housing demands we’re facing, and single-stair multifamily residential buildings could offer us a new way to increase our housing supply.”

“This executive order will bring together the right people – from fire safety officials to architects, accessibility experts and more – who will help us explore the possibilities and find the best path forward.”

Existing practice examples and land capacity estimates

The announcement said Massachusetts would be following an approach used in numerous U.S. states and in other countries if it adopts a single-stair standard for residential buildings above three storeys.

It gave examples including New York City and Seattle permitting single-stair buildings up to six storeys for decades and Honolulu legalising them in 2012.

It also said Tennessee, Montana and Connecticut have enacted legislation allowing single-stair buildings up to six storeys under specified safety conditions.

The release cited Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies identifying 4,955 underutilised parcels within ¾ mile of rapid transit that could host a mid-rise building.

It said the Joint Center for Housing Studies estimates these sites could produce up to 130,000 new housing units through urban infill alone if single stair is allowed up to six storeys and 24 units.

John Nunnari, Executive Director, AIA Massachusetts, said: “This is a thoughtful, evidence-driven step that brings together architects, fire-safety professionals and public officials to carefully evaluate how housing production, affordability and life-safety can be advanced together.”

“We look forward to contributing our expertise to a transparent, data-informed process that prioritizes both safe building design and the creation of much-needed housing across the Commonwealth.”

The release said the advisory group will study feasibility and safety risks as part of the executive order’s process.

What giga-projects mean for fire alarm components in the Middle East

A new market report sets a 2026 baseline for the Middle East fire alarm components sector and forecasts how it will evolve to 2035.

The IndexBox Platform analysis defines the market as covering equipment used to detect fires, raise alarms and control systems.

It includes smoke, heat and flame detectors, manual call points, alarm sounders, visual indicators, control panels and input output modules.

It splits the market between conventional systems and addressable intelligent systems, with the latter gaining traction in high-value developments.

It identifies the Gulf Cooperation Council countries Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain as the region’s largest market because of construction activity and tighter regulation.

It says the value chain runs from manufacturers to distributors, system integrators, consultants and contractors before reaching public and private end users.

Demand from codes and mega-projects

The report links demand to stronger national fire and life safety codes, citing the Saudi Building Code and the UAE Fire and Life Safety Code of Practice, and notes their alignment with NFPA and EN standards.

It points to Saudi Vision 2030 projects such as NEOM, the Red Sea Project and Qiddiya, alongside major UAE developments including Expo City Dubai, as major sources of demand.

It says commercial and residential buildings, oil and gas sites and public infrastructure such as airports, metro systems, hospitals and schools all drive consumption of fire alarm components.

It adds that higher insurance costs and business continuity concerns are pushing some organisations beyond minimum code requirements.

Supply, trade and pricing

The report says supply combines imported products with growing regional assembly and manufacturing, particularly in the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

It notes that local production mainly covers control panels, standard detectors, manual call points, alarm sounders and backup batteries, while key electronic parts remain imported.

It identifies China, Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom as major sources of imports, with Jebel Ali in the UAE and King Abdullah Port in Saudi Arabia acting as key logistics hubs.

It says pricing is shaped by global costs for plastics, metals and semiconductors, and by whether products are conventional or addressable.

It adds that large projects typically involve bundled pricing that includes design support, software, commissioning and warranties, with maintenance and spare parts providing ongoing revenue.

The market is expected to shift towards connected fire alarm systems that feed data into wider building and city networks as regulations evolve around performance reporting, cybersecurity and false alarm control.

Building confidence in passive fire protection with Siderise

Peter Schmitt, US Senior Technical Services Engineer at Siderise, outlines system design, contractor needs and compliance considerations for project teams navigating varied codes

Passive fire protection underpins building safety, but varying state requirements, differing inspection practices and hard-to-verify installations leave contractors and specifiers facing complex demands.

Siderise supports this work with dry-fit firestopping and fireblocking systems.

IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey sat down with US Senior Technical Services Engineer Peter Schmitt to discuss how Siderise approaches compliance, testing and contractor support across the US market.

How would you describe Siderise’s product range and its role within wider building protection systems?

Siderise’s engineered product range supports all building exterior applications, including curtain walling and rainscreen with firestopping and fireblocking, which are both forms of passive fire protection.

The industry has developed some well-established solutions for passive fire containment over the years.

However, many of them require application of a spray or sealant to provide a smoke seal, which consumes time and money.

Siderise’s unique one-part dry-fit systems such as the CW-FS Firestop and Perimeter Barrier eliminate this additional step, simplifying the installation considerably.

Our products are unique in the fact that they feature a vertical fibre stone wool Lamella insulation core, which in turn offers unique attributes in terms of functional performance, durability and the ability to withstand building and façade movement.

Compartmentalisation is the name of the game in passive fire protection.

The goal of systems such as ours is not to extinguish a fire, but rather to restrict it to the point of origin and delay its spread to adjacent spaces.

This offers occupants, first responders, etc. sufficient time to evacuate the building.

Passive fire protection not only helps save lives but also limits damage to the structure, which can save the building owner a substantial amount of money on repairs.

What key challenges do differing state codes and varied enforcement practices create for maintaining compliance?

Code requirements and regulations can vary from one state to another, but passive fire protection requirements are very much tied to the International Building Code (IBC) so there is a significant amount of overlap.

However, one of the areas where we see the greatest variance right now is with code requirements related to fireblocking.

The IBC outlines very generic requirements for fireblocking.

In my opinion, these requirements are lagging behind other areas of the world such as the UK, where fireblocking regulations and testing standards have evolved.

That being said, I am encouraged by the relatively recent introduction of the 2022 New York City Building Code, which sought to more clearly define fireblocking requirements in NYC.

We are hopeful that other major cities will follow suit and that such practices will become more commonplace.

The time to implement such changes is not after a major incident occurs, but before.

How significant is third party testing and certification when demonstrating reliable performance of passive systems?

When dealing with life safety, the importance of testing and certification cannot be overstated.

Without comparable third-party testing and certification in accordance with the applicable testing standards, there is no way to know whether any given configuration of construction materials will provide the necessary level of fire performance.

Incorporation of certified passive fire protection systems into the building design and compliance with relevant building codes offers peace of mind to building owners and occupants alike.

Siderise always supports products with third party testing, where required.

What common installation or inspection issues most affect system performance on projects you have supported?

With regard to curtain wall joints, the most common issue I’ve seen relates to improper installation of the safing material between the slab edge and curtain wall in two-part pack and spray systems.

Insufficient compression of this material can result in premature failure during a fire or inability to handle the anticipated movement throughout the lifetime of the building.

Application of spray over the top of the safing material can also hide imperfections that could contribute to premature failure, making it very difficult for inspectors to adequately assess installation quality without destructive testing.

It also requires drying time, which makes the installation process longer.

Siderise’s CW-FS dry-fit curtain wall system, on the other hand, features a foil-facing on both sides which visibly crinkles when compressed.

This, coupled with the absence of spray on the top side, allows inspectors to easily verify that the material was continuously installed with no gaps and proper compression.

How does Siderise’s technical support extend from design and specification through to final verification?

Siderise’s technical support doesn’t end once we’ve been added to a customer’s specification, or after they’ve placed an order.

We want our customers to feel comfortable reaching out to us, at any stage of the project, no matter the question or concern.

We’re here to offer them assurance throughout the entire process, from start to finish and thereafter.

What training or guidance do contractors most often need to ensure correct installation and standards compliance?

A contractor should not only be well trained on material installation but should also be familiarised with the certified systems they are installing in accordance with.

One of the biggest challenges with ensuring proper installation is that knowledge is not always properly transferred after personnel changes.

Siderise would be happy to provide periodic virtual trainings and/or send a representative to conduct on site trainings including benchmark mock up constructions for installers to keep them up to speed.

Our site services offerings also include installation inspections to verify that they fall within the parameters of our systems.

We also offer CPD training backed up with extensive product data, which offers great support to specifiers.

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.