Lithium-ion battery fires: Why prevention alone is no longer enough

As lithium-ion battery fires become more frequent, Juho Toukola, CSO of Latauspolku Oy, examines why fire safety strategies must move beyond prevention and address the consequences of thermal runaway

Lithium-ion batteries are everywhere. They power e-bike commutes, cordless tools on every construction site and robot mowers in groundskeeping fleets. Their numbers grow every year and so do the number of fires they cause. In January 2026, a DSV logistics terminal in Poland burned to the ground.

In Finland, a country of roughly 5.7 million people, two battery fires made national news within this spring. In Oulu in April 2026, a family of two adults and four children were forced to evacuate their home and were subsequently hospitalised, while neighbouring apartments suffered smoke damage.

In Espoo in May 2026, a tenant noticed an e-scooter battery beginning to overheat and did exactly what every safety guideline instructs: he moved to take it away from everything else. It exploded in his face and the fire spread to an e-bike battery beside it.

Apartment destroyed, building and other apartments suffered massive smoke damages. These are not exotic events anymore. More batteries mean more failures and a failing lithium-ion battery is unlike anything else in our buildings and workplaces. Once thermal runaway begins, there is no practical way for an ordinary person to put it out.

What happens when a lithium-ion battery fails

Thermal runaway is a self-accelerating chain reaction inside the battery cell. Heat generates more heat, cell by cell and the battery becomes its own fuel and its own oxygen source. This is why a battery fire behaves so differently from a bin fire. It reignites.

It ejects burning material. Cells can rupture violently, turning the battery into a source of projectiles as the Espoo tenant learned at close range. The fire itself is only part of the danger.

A burning lithium-ion battery releases a cocktail of toxic gases, most notably hydrogen fluoride. It is dangerous even at low concentrations. In large quantities it penetrates skin and tissue, but even in the light smoke we see before visible ignition it attacks the lungs and can cause severe injury to people who never see a flame. The Oulu family were hospitalised not because flames reached them, but because smoke and gas did. This combination of unstoppable fire, violent failure and toxic gas is what makes the lithium-ion problem categorically different from the fire risks our buildings were designed for.

Three pillars of lithium-ion battery fire safety, two of which fail at the critical moment

Society currently governs this risk with three tools: guidelines, restrictions and technology. It is worth being honest about what each one can and cannot do.

Guidelines are genuinely valuable. Charge with the original charger, inspect batteries for damage, do not charge unattended, do not charge near exits. Followed properly, they greatly reduce the already small probability of a fire.

But probability reduction is all they do. Guidelines do not stop thermal runaway once it begins and they quietly assume a level of supervision that does not exist in real life. The standard instruction to “supervise charging” asks a resident to watch a battery for seven hours or a logistics operator to assign a human to every charging shelf.

Nobody does this. Everybody knows nobody does this. And as Espoo showed, even the person who notices the problem early and follows the guidance to the letter can end up in the path of the failure. Restrictions are the newer instrument and they deserve more scrutiny than they get.

Housing companies and facility operators across Europe are responding to the risk by banning e-bike and e-scooter charging indoors. On paper, the risk disappears. In practice, it goes underground.

People do not stop charging the device they depend on for their commute. They charge it in their apartment, behind a closed door, where no policy reaches and no detection exists. A prohibited risk that everyone quietly takes is not a managed risk.

It is a denied one and it surfaces exactly the way the Espoo and Oulu fires did: inside homes, where people live and sleep.

A wild west of lithium-ion battery fires solutions

Walk through any fire safety exhibition and you will find an expanding catalogue of products marketed against battery fires. Many of them solve a fraction of the problem and leave the rest untouched.

Fire pouches, blankets and battery tarps can be useful for small consumer cells, but an e-mobility battery pack in full thermal runaway generates enough sustained energy to defeat most of them in seconds rather than contain them for minutes.

Specialised battery extinguishers exist but using one effectively means approaching a device that is ejecting flame, gas and potentially projectiles. For a trained responder in protective equipment with self-contained breathing apparatus, that is workable.

For a resident, a warehouse worker or a night-shift caretaker, in normal clothing it is not a realistic instruction. Passive fireproof cabinets are a step up.

They contain the fire and protect the surrounding space from flame spread. But containment is not suppression. The reaction continues inside and the toxic gases still need somewhere to go.

The effect to people problem remains unsolved. Active suppression systems based on aerosols go further and attempt to interrupt the fire. The difficulty is that aerosols suppress visible flame without reliably stopping the chain reaction underneath it and testing has shown that suppressing the flame while the cells continue venting flammable gas can create explosive conditions. Slowing the reaction is not the same as ending it.

Stop arguing probability. Engineer for consequence of lithium-ion battery fires

The uncomfortable truth is that these fires cannot be prevented. As long as lithium-ion chemistry surrounds us, a small number of failures is a statistical certainty. The meaningful question is not ‘how to reach zero probability’, because we cannot.

It is what happens in the building when the failure occurs. Research within Finland’s national LION project points to a clear answer: water immersion.

Global Fire Equipment launches FALCON fire detection and extinguishing panels

Global Fire Equipment (GFE) has expanded its fire protection portfolio with the launch of two new control panels, FALCON and FALCON Ex, designed for commercial, industrial and critical infrastructure applications.

The new range brings together certified fire detection and extinguishing control technology, with GFE saying the panels have been developed to support vigilance, reliability and precision across a range of fire safety environments.

FALCON is an intelligent conventional fire detection control panel intended to meet a wide range of building requirements, while FALCON Ex is a dedicated extinguishing control panel certified to EN12094-1 for fire suppression management.

According to GFE, the FALCON panel offers a scalable conventional fire detection solution with Double-Knock logic to help reduce unwanted alarms, cause-and-effect programming and EN54-certified reliability supported by comprehensive power supply monitoring.

FALCON Ex has been developed for applications where fire suppression performance is critical. The panel includes advanced discharge management, integrated Hold and Abort functions, and full monitoring of valves, pressure, release circuits and extinguishing status to support operational control.

Both panels are certified to EN54 and EN12094-1 requirements. GFE said the range has been created to meet the evolving needs of fire safety professionals by combining certified performance with ease of use.

José A. Azevedo, Business and Innovation Manager of the GSS Group, said: “Innovation remains a pillar of our international growth strategy. The FALCON range reinforces our commitment to delivering Portuguese-developed technology capable of meeting the fire safety challenges faced by customers around the world.”

Part of the GSS Group, Global Fire Equipment develops and manufactures fire detection, alarm and control systems for customers in more than 90 countries. The company said the launch of FALCON and FALCON Ex strengthens its strategy of delivering certified fire protection technologies to international markets.

5 of the biggest fire safety news stories of 2026 so far

2026 has already delivered no shortage of headlines in terms of fire safety news. As fire risks continue to evolve, so too does the industry’s response, with innovation, regulation and investment shaping the future of fire protection and life safety.

In this roundup, we look back at five of the biggest fire safety news stories of 2026 so far. These developments have captured the attention of fire safety professionals worldwide, influencing policy, operations and the technologies protecting people, property and critical infrastructure.

KiddeFenwal expands NATURA line with Micro fire protection for small assets

In January, KiddeFenwal launched NATURA Micro, a compact inert gas fire suppression system offered through its Kidde Fire Systems brand.

The system was introduced at Intersec in Dubai, which took place from 12 to 14 January. NATURA Micro forms part of the company’s inert gas systems portfolio and is intended to protect enclosed, small-sized assets.

Swiss ski resort fire at Le Constellation

January also saw a devastating fire break out at Le Constellation, Crans-Montana, Switzerland, during New Year celebrations in the early hours of 01/01/2026.

Police said the fire started at around 1:30am local time, when the basement bar was busy with revellers marking the turn of the year.

Click here for our coverage on timeline, casualties and investigation.

New Class L created specifically for lithium-ion battery fires

February kicked off with the launch of a new classification for lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery fires. BSI confirmed the update reflects the growing use of Li-ion batteries across the built environment, from large energy storage systems to electric vehicles and personal mobility devices.

Fire safety news

The standard classifies fires according to the nature of the material undergoing combustion.

Battery storage standard UL 9540A updated with large-scale fire testing

Standards and regulations were also on the mind in terms of fire safety news in March, with UL Standards & Solutions publishing the sixth edition of UL 9540A, adding large-scale fire testing requirements to the standard for evaluating thermal runaway fire propagation in battery energy storage systems.

The new edition was published on 13 March and is described it as a key standard for battery energy storage systems (BESS), including lithium-ion systems.

Philippines launches Fire Prevention Month

Meanwhile, March saw the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) officially launch Fire Prevention Month in the Philippines with an assembly of more than 3,000 people and over 300 vehicles on March 1.

The Manila Bulletin reported that the event was led by BFP chief Director Jesus Fernandez.

The launch brought together BFP personnel, national government agencies, local and barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Offices, fire volunteers, fire brigades, private partners and non-government organisations.

Hochiki Training Academy launches FIREbeam course for beam smoke detection projects

Hochiki Europe has expanded its online Training Academy with a free course covering the FIREbeam beam smoke detection range for large open-space application

Hochiki Europe has expanded its online Training Academy with the launch of a new course focused on its FIREbeam beam smoke detection range.

Available free of charge to registered users, the course is designed to help installers, specifiers and distributors develop their knowledge of beam smoke detection and gain confidence in specifying and installing FIREbeam systems for projects involving large, open spaces.

The course introduces both products in the FIREbeam range, including the addressable FIREbeam Xtra and the conventional FIREbeam Conex, alongside the accessories available across the portfolio. It also covers the fundamentals of beam smoke detection, which is commonly used in environments where point detection is impractical, such as warehouses, shopping centres, sports halls, museums, hotel atriums and transport terminals.

The new module forms part of the Hochiki Training Academy, a free online learning platform created for professionals working with Hochiki products, including installers, distributors, specifiers and facilities teams. Courses are completed online, allowing users to learn at their own pace from any location. Each course concludes with an assessment, with successful learners receiving certification.

According to Hochiki Europe, the Academy has grown to more than 2,000 users in just a few years and is now used by businesses across the UK, Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

Martin Green, Commercial Training and Support Manager at Hochiki Europe, said: “The FIREbeam course is another building block in the Academy library. Whether someone is new to our products or has worked with Hochiki for years, the Academy is there to support learning throughout their career, not just at the point of installation or specification.

“Because it is entirely self-paced and accessible from anywhere, our customers can build their knowledge in a way that fits around their own working day, no matter where they are based. If you have a project coming up with a large open space, whether that is a warehouse, an atrium or a sports hall, this course gives you a solid grounding in the FIREbeam range before you get started.”

The FIREbeam training course is available now through the Hochiki Training Academy.

Ramtech deploys wireless fire detection system at 2026 Le Mans race

Ramtech has successfully deployed its wireless fire detection technology at the 2026 24 Hours of Le Mans, providing temporary fire protection across key event infrastructure and demonstrating the increasing adoption of automated fire safety systems at major motorsport events.

Working alongside event infrastructure specialist iEvent and integration partner Prodomo, Ramtech France installed a temporary network of more than 300 wireless devices, including smoke and heat detectors and manual call points. The system protected 14 team paddocks and the Genesis Hospitality Building throughout the event.

Installed on a one-month rental basis, the system delivered continuous 24/7 fire monitoring during both the event build-up and race period, with the core live system operating for one week.

The deployment follows a similar installation at the Formula 1 Hungarian Grand Prix, reflecting a broader trend among major motorsport organisers towards wireless fire protection systems that can be rapidly installed and adapted.

Bruna Esposito, Business Unit Director at Ramtech, said: “The environment at a modern Grand Prix or endurance race closely mirrors the extreme complexities of major commercial construction or industrial sites; massive temporary structures, constantly evolving site layouts, tight installation windows and millions of dollars in critical team assets. Managing these risks via manual human patrols is increasingly seen as an outdated and reactive liability.

“We are seeing a fundamental shift in how the world’s largest public events manage fire safety. Rather than relying on traditional, human-led fire watch personnel to manually patrol grounds, tier-one event organisers are embracing automated wireless safety technology to protect people and temporary infrastructure. This project represents an important milestone for Ramtech, demonstrating the trust that global event organisers place in our technology.”

Because the wireless mesh system requires no cabling or conduit, additional devices could be installed or relocated as site layouts evolved during the build-up to race day, allowing organisers to respond quickly to changing operational requirements.

Wireless system chosen for flexibility

Antoine Galicher, Project Manager at iEvent, said: “Flexibility was one of the key reasons we chose Ramtech’s WES system. For an event of this scale, we needed a solution that could deliver both reliability and ease of deployment, allowing us to adapt quickly as requirements changed. The wireless technology simplified installation while helping us maintain the high safety standards expected at Le Mans.”

Sylvain Castaignau, Business Development Manager for Ramtech France, added: “The customer was initially looking for a solution to improve fire safety but was not aware that an automated system like WES existed. From the first demonstration, it became clear that the flexibility and functionality of the system were perfectly suited to an event environment where requirements change daily. This project proves how temporary fire protection can evolve beyond traditional fire watch approaches.”

Ramtech highlights wider event safety trends

Ramtech believes the Le Mans project reflects a wider shift in temporary fire protection for large-scale events, where organisers are increasingly seeking alternatives to manual fire watch patrols.

Esposito said: “With the additional risk posed by increasing summer temperatures and prolonged heatwaves, relying on manual human labour for continuous fire watch patrols introduces major occupational health risks and soaring overtime costs. In addition, there is a heightened concern around the potential for outbreaks of fire, particularly in conditions of dry outdoor spaces, where events may be held.”

The company says the project demonstrates how wireless fire detection technology can provide flexible protection for temporary venues, particularly where layouts change frequently during construction and event preparation.

MSA Safety completes $555 million acquisition of Autronica Fire and Security

MSA Safety has completed its acquisition of Autronica Fire and Security, strengthening its fire and gas detection portfolio and expanding its presence in key global markets

MSA Safety Incorporated has completed its acquisition of Autronica Fire and Security in a transaction valued at approximately $555 million, strengthening its position in the global fire and gas detection market.

Headquartered in Trondheim, Norway, Autronica designs, manufactures and supplies fire detection, gas detection and alarm systems. The company reported approximately $160 million in sales during 2025.

MSA said the acquisition supports its mission and Accelerate profitable growth strategy, while enhancing its capabilities in fixed fire and gas detection technologies.

Steve Blanco, President and CEO of MSA Safety, said: “We are excited to officially welcome Autronica to the MSA family.

“The addition of this highly complementary business accelerates MSA’s fixed detection growth strategy by enhancing our ability to deliver integrated safety solutions across critical infrastructure, energy and marine applications.

“Autronica’s geographic footprint is also complementary to MSA’s current market reach and, together with its expertise and leadership in fire and gas safety systems, positions us well to expand into an attractive, growing $3 billion-plus addressable market while delivering on our mission.”

According to MSA, the acquisition expands the company’s reach across critical infrastructure, energy and marine sectors while increasing its exposure to the global fixed fire and gas detection market.

The transaction was financed using cash on hand and borrowings under MSA’s existing credit facility. MSA also expects the acquisition to be accretive to its adjusted earnings per share in the first full year of ownership.

PFAS-free fire extinguishers: future-proofing fire safety for sustainability and compliance

Andy Spence of Britannia Fire explains how fire safety professionals can prepare for PFAS restrictions, reduce carbon emissions and improve whole-life value through PFAS-free technology, circular economy principles and sustainable procurement

The fire safety sector is entering a period of significant change. Growing environmental expectations, evolving regulations surrounding PFAS and increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions are prompting organisations to reassess how fire protection products are specified, managed and maintained throughout their lifecycle.

At the same time, budget constraints and supply chain considerations are placing greater emphasis on long-term value rather than upfront cost alone. Future proofing requires organisations to anticipate regulatory change, reduce environmental impact and invest in solutions that deliver long-term operational and financial benefits.

From PFAS free technologies to circular economy principles, the decisions made today will shape both sustainability performance and future resilience.

PFAS regulations and the fire safety challenge

Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), known as ‘forever’ chemicals, have historically been used in firefighting foams and fire extinguishers because of their unique ability to rapidly suppress flammable liquid fires.

However, they are under intense scrutiny as they do not degrade easily in the environment and can lead to a range of health issues, including decreased fertility, developmental delays in children, a higher risk of certain cancers and immune system suppression.

Across the European Union, regulations restricting PFAS in firefighting foams and extinguishers came into force on 23 October 2025, with a ban in most scenarios taking effect from 23 October 2030. The UK government is also taking this issue seriously.

Earlier this year the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) published its PFAS plan, which outlines key steps the government will take to understand, manage and reduce exposure to PFAS. Some action is already being taken, with the Health & Safety Executive (HSE), the agency which regulates chemicals placed on the market in Great Britain (GB), due to report back later this year on how PFAS should be phased out of firefighting foam in the UK.

The HSE is suggesting a staggered approach to phasing out PFAS in firefighting foam and extinguishers, depending on use and type. Looking at the proposed timescales for transition, it’s unlikely fire extinguishers containing PFAS would be phased out before 2031, but what we do know is that they will probably be the first to go – in part due to advances in technology and credible alternatives.

We are expecting the HSE to publish its final opinion later this year, with a decision on UK wide restrictions to follow soon after. As PFAS bans take effect across the EU and the

UK moves towards tighter regulation, those responsible for fire safety need to evaluate their existing assets, develop transition strategies for equipment containing PFAS, budget for replacement costs and manage the complex requirements associated with disposal and environmental compliance.

Transitioning to PFAS-free fire extinguishers and foams

We recognised the detrimental effects of PFAS some time ago and removed them from all our products in 2024. Since then, we have been at the forefront of shaping future fire safety regulation in the UK.

In June last year, I addressed the Environmental Audit Committee in the House of Commons, sharing our experience of phasing out PFAS with the aim of helping policymakers understand both the environmental urgency and the practical realities of a transition.

The emergence of high performing PFAS free solutions is helping to dispel the myth that switching to PFAS free is a compromise. Britannia’s lightweight, composite P50 fire extinguishers are a prime example of how the industry is evolving, combining proven fire suppression performance with PFAS free technology and a reduced environmental footprint.

They are tried and tested in the real world, meaning organisations can confidently transition away from PFAS while maintaining the levels of protection, reliability and compliance that modern fire safety demands.

Organisations need to start thinking about this now. They should review their stock to establish what needs replacing and put in place an action plan as part of their usual fire risk assessments and in accordance with their health and safety asset management plan.

If existing stock is nearing its end of life, has failed an inspection or Knowledge Partner additional units are required, make the switch and get ahead of the ban. Allow time for transition but don’t panic.

Use a reputable supplier that will support and provide advice throughout the process.

Circular economy principles for sustainable fire protection

Future-proofing fire safety requires organisations to look beyond the initial purchase cost and consider the entire lifecycle of their fire protection assets. Factors such as maintenance requirements, replacement frequency, waste generation and end-of-life disposal all contribute to the true environmental and financial cost of a product.

Adopting a lifecycle approach enables organisations to identify solutions that deliver long-term value, reduce resource consumption and minimise carbon emissions. In an era of increasing sustainability expectations, understanding the full lifecycle impact of fire safety equipment is becoming just as important as assessing its firefighting performance.

Composite fire extinguishers and long-life fire safety equipment

Traditionally, steel fire extinguishers have been the go-to solution for facilities managers and fire safety professionals, but they are prone to corrosion and therefore need servicing every year and often replacing every five years.

Composite fire extinguishers, however, are helping organisations to meet stringent waste and carbon reduction targets and simplifying fire safety. They’re made from a unique combination of durable plastic and aramid fibres, meaning they are strong, don’t corrode and therefore last 20 years.

They don’t require costly annual servicing, just simple, efficient in-house checks done as part of an organisation’s routine maintenance programme and a full refurbishment after 10 years.

They are also multipurpose, meaning organisations don’t need as many. Britannia’s composite P50 fire extinguishers are used worldwide and despite some claims to the contrary, they conform to all required regulations and standards, including BS EN3-7.

Delivering long-term cost savings Sustainable products like the P50 are well positioned to deliver long-term savings. High-quality, long-lasting equipment with reduced maintenance and replacement requirements lowers ongoing operational costs, while PFAS free solutions help organisations avoid future disposal expenses and compliance challenges associated with evolving regulations.

P50s are also multi-purpose, capable of tackling Class A and B fires as well as electrical fires, reducing the number of extinguishers needed and saving money.

By taking a whole-life cost approach, organisations can identify solutions that not only support sustainability objectives but also deliver measurable financial benefits over time.

Reducing carbon emissions across the fire safety lifecycle

Manufacturing, transportation, maintenance and end-of-life disposal all contribute to a product’s overall carbon footprint, making it important to look beyond operational performance alone.

By assessing lifecycle emissions rather than simply focusing on purchase price, organisations can identify opportunities to significantly reduce their environmental impact.

For example, selecting composite fire extinguishers that don’t require annual servicing reduces vehicle journeys and associated emissions, while products that don’t need frequently replacing, lowers the carbon costs linked to manufacturing and transportation.

They are also fully recyclable, with solar assisted, low energy manufacturing helping to minimise their carbon footprint. Choosing durable, reusable and recyclable fire safety equipment can therefore make a meaningful contribution to both carbon reduction targets and wider sustainability objectives.

Future-proofing fire safety with sustainable compliance strategies

Fire safety and sustainability are no longer separate considerations. By embracing PFAS-free technologies, lifecycle thinking and circular economy principles today, organisations can strengthen compliance, reduce costs and improve environmental performance. This will ensure that those organisations are well prepared for the challenges and opportunities of the future.

Fire safety compliance for housing providers: Beyond waking watch

Hyfire’s Brett Boyd explains how wireless fire detection is helping housing providers achieve fire safety compliance and reduce reliance on waking watch

For housing providers across the UK, fire safety compliance remains one of the most pressing challenges facing the sector.

As organisations continue to address issues including unsafe cladding, compartmentation failures and inadequate fire stopping, there is increasing pressure to find solutions that not only meet regulatory requirements but can be implemented quickly, cost-effectively and with minimal disruption to residents.

The launch of the Interim Measures Alarm Fund (IMAF) by Homes England in April 2026 is designed to help tackle that challenge, providing funding for housing providers to upgrade fire safety systems in buildings where urgent remedial works are required.

According to Brett Boyd, Regional Sales Manager – South East at Hyfire, the fund represents far more than a financial opportunity. “Compliance is at the centre of it all,” he says. “It’s not just about ticking boxes to access the funding. It’s about making sure systems are actually doing what they’re supposed to do, and that’s protecting people.”

The introduction of IMAF comes at a time when many housing providers are seeking alternatives to temporary fire safety measures while remediation projects are undertaken.

In particular, the industry continues to look for ways to reduce reliance on waking watch arrangements, which can be expensive to maintain over extended periods.

“A big driver behind it has been the need to move away from costly measures like waking watch and towards a more cost-effective and more permanent solution,” says Boyd.

For landlords and building managers, compliance is increasingly about demonstrating that buildings are safe while also providing reassurance to residents.

“Being compliant means housing providers can demonstrate that they are meeting their obligations and can safely step away from things like waking watch, which can be both disruptive and expensive over time,” he explains.

“At the end of the day, compliance gives everyone confidence, from the landlords to the residents. It’s the right level of protection that needs to be in place.”

Delivering fire safety compliance without complexity

While funding provides an opportunity for improvement, implementing compliant fire safety systems can still present practical challenges.

This is particularly true in occupied residential buildings, where traditional hardwired installations can create disruption for residents and significantly extend project timescales.

For Boyd, one of the key advantages of Hyfire’s Taurus system is that compliance has been built into the technology from the outset. “Taurus was developed with real-world challenges in mind, so compliance is built into what we do,” he says.

“Our systems are fully certified and designed to align with the standards that sit behind funding schemes like IMAF.”

However, Boyd is quick to point out that technology alone is only part of the solution.  “One of our big advantages is our network of approved installers,” he explains. “It means organisations aren’t just getting the technology, but also the right expertise to deliver a compliant solution from start to finish.”

That installer network plays an important role in ensuring systems are delivered correctly and in accordance with the latest requirements.

“Installers understand both the technical side and the compliance requirements, which makes the whole process much smoother,” he says.

The flexibility of wireless technology also helps simplify projects that might otherwise be difficult to deliver.

“Because it’s wireless, it gives a lot more flexibility when designing and installing, particularly in buildings where running cables would be difficult or disruptive.” In many cases, speed can be just as important as compliance.

“It’s particularly effective in situations where a fast upgrade is needed,” Boyd adds, revealing that ultimately the goal is straightforward.

“It’s about making compliance more achievable, helping organisations meet funding criteria without overcomplicating the projects that they’re working on.”

Why wireless fire detection is changing the conversation

Wireless fire detection systems have evolved significantly over the last two decades and are increasingly becoming a preferred solution rather than a specialist alternative.

According to Boyd, the technology has transformed the way retrofit projects can be delivered. “Wireless has been a game changer, especially for retrofit projects,” he says.

 “The biggest benefit is the lack of disruption. There’s no need to run cabling through walls and ceilings. Residents can stay in their homes while the system is installed.” For housing providers managing occupied residential buildings, that ability to complete works without requiring residents to relocate can deliver major benefits.

Speed is another important factor. “It’s also much quicker to install, which naturally helps keep costs under control when you look at a whole project,” Boyd explains. “Given the ongoing cost of waking watch, that speed can make a real financial difference.”

One misconception that still occasionally exists within the market is that wireless systems may not offer the same level of reliability as traditional wired installations.

Boyd is keen to challenge that perception. “Modern wireless systems are incredibly robust and perform to the same standards as wired systems,” he says. “There’s no compromise there.” He believes the flexibility of wireless technology is another significant advantage.

“Buildings can change over time and wireless systems can make it easy to adapt without needing major works again in the future.”

Overall, he says, the benefits are clear. “It’s about delivering a safer compliance solution in a way that works for both the building and the people that live in that building.”

Adapting to changing fire safety regulations

As regulations continue to evolve, flexibility is becoming an increasingly valuable feature of fire safety systems. One example is BS 8629, the standard covering evacuation alert systems for use by fire and rescue services in blocks of flats.

For many building owners, the prospect of upgrading systems to meet new requirements can raise concerns about cost and disruption. However, Boyd says this is often not necessary with HyFire systems.

“One of the strengths of Hyfire is how adaptable our system is,” he explains. “If a building needs to meet the requirements of BS 8629, it’s often not a case of ripping everything out and starting again. Instead, we can build on what’s already there.”

In many cases, the process is relatively straightforward. “With proper planning from the outset of a project, it can be as simple as changing out the panel, removing the automatic detectors and doing some basic reprogramming of the system.”

The wireless nature of the technology once again provides a major advantage. “Because it’s wireless, those changes can usually be made without major disruption as well,” Boyd says.

“Residents don’t need to leave their homes.” The approach not only helps simplify compliance but also protects previous investment. “Overall, it’s a pretty straightforward upgrade and it helps protect the original investment in the system as well.”

The future of fire safety compliance

Despite the progress that has been made, Boyd believes housing providers still face considerable challenges. “There’s obviously a lot for housing providers to consider and manage at the moment,” he says.

“Things like compartmentation, unsafe cladding on buildings and substandard fire stopping are major contributing factors and they need to be addressed.” While waking watch remains a common response during remediation works, he believes the industry is increasingly recognising the limitations of the approach.

“While they do provide short-term reassurance, they’re not a sustainable solution and can become very costly over time,” he says. “There’s also the human element to waking watch, where it’s not always as reliable as it should be. Having an automatic detection system can sometimes be a more reliable solution.”

Looking ahead, Boyd sees wireless technology becoming even more prominent across the residential sector. “Where wireless was traditionally always used where cabling couldn’t be installed as a must-have solution, it’s now becoming a go-to solution for a lot of people because the technology has improved over the last two decades.”

Future developments are likely to focus on connectivity and visibility, helping housing providers manage fire safety more effectively across their portfolios. “There’s going to be a bigger focus on smarter, more connected systems that can give housing providers better oversight and control.”

At the same time, resident experience will remain central to decision-making. “When it comes to IMAF, it’s important to note that everything will continue to centre around the residents,” Boyd says.

“The improvements don’t come at a cost of comfort or convenience.” For Hyfire, the long-term objective remains simple.

“We believe in providing the right solution,” he says. “It’s not just about putting something in. It’s the right solution for the right application, solutions that meet the highest standards of safety while still being practical and efficient for the environments that they serve.”

Hellenic Fire System captures first image less than a month after launch

OroraTech has announced that its Hellenic Fire System has captured its first thermal image over Greece less than one month after satellite launch, marking a major milestone toward the country’s future national wildfire monitoring capability.

The first image is said to demonstrate the rapid deployment and operational readiness of OroraTech’s thermal sensing technology. The image, preceded by two weeks of imaging calibration, reveals the thermal signature of the Athens metropolitan area, as well as the islands of Andros, Tinos, Skyros, Chios, Kea, and Kythnos, and visible thermal patterns created by swirling currents across the Aegean Sea.

The sensors are designed to provide highly accurate land surface temperature measurements and wildfire detection capabilities while operating from low Earth orbit with low latency and frequent revisit rates.

Martin Langer, CEO of OroraTech, said: ” This milestone shows our ability to rapidly bring sophisticated space assets into service while providing the high-quality thermal data needed for wildfire detection, environmental monitoring, and scientific research.”

The Hellenic Fire System is being developed as part of Greece’s national investment in space-based wildfire resilience. Once fully operational, the constellation will scan the entirety of Greece twice per day, providing continuous thermal monitoring to support wildfire detection, emergency response, and climate research activities. The system will also generate land surface temperature data for scientists and researchers studying environmental change across the Mediterranean region.

The first-light image confirms that the sensors can observe both terrestrial and maritime thermal phenomena, demonstrating the versatility of the system for a wide range of operational and scientific applications.

The project is being carried out under an ESA Contract in the framework of the Greek National Satellite Space Project. The Project: Small-Satellites (Measure ID 16855) is implemented by the Hellenic Ministry of Digital Governance and Artificial Intelligence with the European Space Agency (ESA) Assistance in the Management and Implementation. The project is part of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan ‘Greece 2.0’, which is funded by the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), core programme of the European Union-NextGenerationEU.

BS 5839-1:2025: Why cyber security is now essential for modern fire alarm systems

Nicholas Whiting, VP Alarm Signalling, AddSecure UK, explains why the updated code of practice reflects the growing need to protect both the physical and digital resilience of modern fire alarm systems

The updated BS 5839-1:2025 code of practice reflects the increasing connectivity of fire alarm systems, introducing stronger guidance on remote access, signalling resilience and system security. As fire alarm technology evolves, cyber security is becoming a core part of protecting life safety and ensuring resilient fire detection.

How BS 5839-1:2025 is reshaping fire alarm best practice

Introduced in 2025, BS 5839-1:2025 replaced the previous 2017 edition, marking a significant evolution in how the fire alarm sector approaches the design, installation, commissioning and maintenance of fire alarm systems in non-domestic buildings. While the standard remains a code of practice rather than a new regulatory requirement, it reflects the growing complexity of connected fire alarm environments and highlights the increasing importance of cyber security alongside fire safety.

As the industry approaches a year since the publication of BS 5839-1:2025, the updated guidance offers valuable lessons on how fire safety and cyber security are becoming increasingly interconnected.

For many years, BS 5839-1 has provided the fire and alarm industry with a framework for good practice. The 2025 revision builds on this by improving fire safety guidance, strengthening detection requirements in higher-risk areas and incorporating lessons learned from major incidents, including Grenfell Tower. The revised code also introduces clearer expectations around documentation, false alarm reduction and protecting vulnerable building occupants.

Key changes for Category L and Category P fire alarm systems

Under BS 5839-1:2025, Category L systems, which prioritise life safety, should use smoke or multi-sensor detectors as the default in sleeping accommodation. Zone plans are now considered essential in multi-zone installations and must be verified for accuracy during maintenance.

For residential care premises, the updated guidance recommends automatic transmission of fire signals to alarm receiving centres, recognising that the absence of remote monitoring is no longer considered acceptable. Meanwhile, Category P systems, designed to protect property, include refreshed guidance on detector positioning around structural obstacles, simplified manual call point distances and enhanced signalling requirements. These include alarm signal transmission within 120 seconds and reporting catastrophic loss of both signalling paths within 31 minutes for dual-path systems.

Why cyber security is now part of fire alarm system design

Perhaps the most significant development within BS 5839-1:2025 is its recognition that fire alarm systems are no longer standalone installations. Modern systems are increasingly integrated into wider building networks, communicate over IP infrastructure and can often be accessed remotely for diagnostics and maintenance.

While these capabilities deliver operational benefits, they also introduce cyber security risks that were largely absent from traditional fire alarm systems. Any system capable of remote access presents the potential for unauthorised interference if appropriate safeguards are not in place.

Historically, engineers were required to attend site to diagnose faults or carry out maintenance. Today’s connected systems allow faster fault identification, earlier notification of issues and, in some cases, remote servicing. However, BS 5839-1:2025 makes it clear that improved functionality must be matched by appropriate security measures.

Although the guidance stops short of mandating specific cyber security controls, it outlines best practice for securing remote access. This includes using secure authentication before connections are established and ensuring equipment used to facilitate remote access is housed within locked cabinets or tamper-resistant enclosures. Whether systems communicate via IP or mobile networks, the revised code reinforces the importance of protecting remote access against unauthorised activity.

Strengthening signalling resilience under BS 5839-1:2025

The updated standard also places greater emphasis on signalling resilience, recognising that reliable communication is fundamental to effective fire protection.

For property protection systems, alarm signals should be transmitted within 120 seconds, while life safety systems are expected to achieve even shorter transmission times due to their higher-risk nature. Dual-path signalling devices must report catastrophic loss of both communication paths within 31 minutes (DP2) for Category P systems, helping ensure faults are detected and escalated promptly.

Dual-path radio systems may be used where they satisfy the reporting requirements for DP2 and DP3. For Category L systems, however, catastrophic failures should be reported within three minutes (DP4), with alarm signals transmitted within 90 seconds. DP3 dual-radio systems should only be used where a documented variation justifies their installation, such as where a fixed IP connection is not technically feasible.

These requirements demonstrate that signalling resilience extends beyond the fire alarm panel itself. As remotely monitored systems become increasingly common, installers are relying more heavily on manufacturers and signalling providers to deliver secure, resilient infrastructure capable of meeting the expectations set out in BS 5839-1:2025.

Training and future resilience

Alongside technological improvements, the revised standard also recognises the importance of ongoing competence. Modern fire alarm systems are active, connected assets that require continual management rather than one-off installation. The guidance recommends that installers invest in continuous professional development to ensure their knowledge evolves alongside increasingly sophisticated systems.

As fire alarm technology continues to become more connected, remotely managed and integrated within wider building management systems, cyber security is no longer a separate consideration. BS 5839-1:2025 demonstrates that protecting connected fire alarm systems now requires both physical and digital resilience. The updated code of practice reflects an industry where fire safety and cyber security are becoming inseparable, requiring manufacturers, installers and building owners to consider both as part of delivering resilient life safety systems.