BESA calls time on disinterested third in UK construction competence drive

BESA sets out disinterested third challenge

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has called for a disinterested third of UK construction professionals to be driven out of the industry if they will not raise their standards, following its annual conference in London.

BESA Chief Executive David Frise told delegates at The Brewery, London, that one third of people in construction and related disciplines already work to high professional, legal and technical standards.

He said a further third want to reach that level and need support to do so.

The final third, he argued, are “simply not interested” in improving quality, safety or sustainability.

Frise linked this split directly to the need for better control over competence and compliance across project teams.

David Frise, Chief Executive at BESA, said: “Just doing enough is not good enough.”

BESA used the conference to launch its Member Pledge initiative, which asks member firms to place competence and compliance at the centre of their operations and supply chains.

The association said the pledge is designed to give clients clearer assurance because BESA members must pass a technical audit.

BESA reported that it expelled 14 members earlier in 2025 for failing to meet its required standard.

Frise described that decision as proof that membership is tied to measurable competence.

David Frise, Chief Executive at BESA, added: “Membership needs to stand for something.”

Member Pledge links competence, membership and supply chains

BESA said the Member Pledge is intended to create a commercial incentive for clients to choose audited firms over those without such checks.

The association explained that firms signing the pledge commit to evidence their competence and to expect the same from their subcontractors and suppliers.

It argued that this approach can help address inconsistent quality and compliance through multi-layered supply chains.

BESA said its stance is also a response to persistent procurement and payment practices that place pressure on specialist contractors.

Speakers noted that competence efforts will struggle if contractors cannot secure work on sustainable terms.

They also highlighted the risk that firms willing to cut corners on quality will underbid more compliant competitors.

Procurement practices under fire from contractors

Procurement frameworks and contract terms were described as a central threat to the future of many specialist firms.

Remi Suzan, Managing Director of Gratte Brothers Group, said: “Procurement is killing our industry.”

He warned that many projects do not allow contractors to work at an acceptable profit margin.

Suzan stated that risk is often pushed unfairly down the supply chain.

He said clients are not “bad people” but will rarely remove risk from contracts voluntarily.

Remi Suzan, Managing Director of Gratte Brothers Group, explained: “If there are cost constraints then the contractor is bound to get aggressive and start looking for mistakes in the specification so they can charge for variations.”

Suzan pointed to recent insolvencies at ISG and HE Simm “among others” as examples of what can happen when margins and risk sharing become unsustainable.

He also reported that the quality of tender information has been deteriorating, making accurate pricing harder.

Lilly Gallafent, Director at Cast Consultancy, acknowledged that consultants contribute to this picture because they advise clients on what levels of contractual risk to accept.

Gallafent observed that many clients focus on short-term commercial wins during contract negotiations.

Lilly Gallafent, Director at Cast Consultancy, said: “Change needs to start with clients…and we need to persuade them that even if they feel they have ‘won’ now [in a contract negotiation] they won’t feel that in a few years’ time [when all the problems become apparent].”

She added that better procurement models already exist but are not widely used.

Gallafent reported that her firm tries to allocate risk more evenly by analysing it in more detail, but this depends on client agreement.

Public sector pressures and Building Safety Act duties

Noble Francis from the Construction Products Association told the conference that public sector procurement faces similar pressures.

He said civil servants can struggle to obtain Treasury approval if they plan to specify solutions that exceed allocated budgets, even when they are seeking better long-term value and quality.

Noble Francis, Economics Director at the Construction Products Association, said: “The government has lots of theory and value matrices about how to improve procurement, but this rarely reflects reality…and the industry knows how it works so there will always be companies bidding work at the lower level.”

Speakers set this against the wider building safety agenda.

Gallafent said more clients are now considering the competence of their supply chains because of heightened awareness of legal responsibilities under the Building Safety Act.

Francis added that the Act makes clear that legal risk cannot be passed down contracts.

He said the legislation is changing incentives by placing formal responsibilities on clients.

Neil Hope-Collins from the Office of the Building Safety Regulator highlighted that clients are legally responsible for ensuring safety-related work is properly resourced.

He also said contractors are legally required to confirm that their clients understand their duties under the Act before work starts.

Neil Hope-Collins, from the Office of the Building Safety Regulator, said: “Otherwise, you are breaking the law.”

Competence of clients, late payment and retentions

Jon Vanstone, Chair of the Industry Competence Committee, said the competence of clients is a priority for the Building Safety Regulator.

He reported that guidance aimed specifically at clients will be published later in 2025.

Vanstone also acknowledged that building services and mechanical, electrical and plumbing firms can struggle to identify who the legal client is on complex projects.

The conference linked these issues to the government’s ongoing consultation on late payment and retentions.

Industry body Build UK said the current safety regime could change commercial performance and payment behaviour.

Build UK Chief Executive Suzannah Nichol described current arrangements for performance and payment as unstable.

She argued that the safety framework is “a massive game changer for performance and late payment”.

Suzannah Nichol, Chief Executive at Build UK, said: “We have a once in a lifetime opportunity to do something about [late payment and retentions].”

Nichol criticised retentions as a mechanism that removes cash flow from supply chains.

Suzannah Nichol, Chief Executive at Build UK, added: “This is not a system that works [but just] takes cash flow out of the supply chain.”

She questioned why companies remain in a supply chain if the client does not trust them enough to avoid retentions.

Nichol urged building engineering contractors to use the new safety framework when discussing cost and risk with clients.

She said clients should understand what they receive if they focus only on lower prices.

Nichol also linked the role of trade associations to this conversation.

She said clients should be using members of trade bodies, provided that membership criteria reflect measurable competence.

She pointed to the BESA Member Pledge as an example of how associations can set out what their membership represents for buyers.

How competence and procurement debates affect safety-focused roles

The issues raised at the BESA conference could affect building services engineers, mechanical and electrical engineers, fire engineering consultants and system installers who rely on stable, competence-based procurement routes.

For these groups, the Member Pledge and BESA’s decision to expel 14 firms show how membership criteria can be used to demonstrate audited competence to clients.

Contractors and fire-protection specialists working under the Building Safety Act may need to document how they test that clients understand their legal duties before accepting work.

Facility managers and project clients in high-risk buildings can be directly affected by the clarification that legal responsibility for safety cannot be passed down the supply chain.

Procurement officers in both private and public sectors may have to balance budget constraints against the need to appoint competent, audited firms that can meet safety obligations over the life of a project.

Discussions on late payment and retentions are also relevant for specialist contractors delivering fire safety systems, where cash flow and risk transfer can influence their ability to maintain standards.

The safety specialists helping duty holders face new rules

Safety specialists become Fire Aware educators

Fire Aware has brought together safety specialists as Fire Aware Educators to support organisations across the supply chain as they respond to recent and upcoming fire safety legislation.

The organisation said these educators are drawn from members with expertise across different aspects of fire safety practice.

They are intended to help those with duties under fire safety law understand their responsibilities in a period of extensive regulatory change.

According to Fire Aware, the new educator role is aimed at designers, main contractors, domestic trades, material suppliers, building management, hotel and leisure operators, commercial and private landlords and local authorities.

Gavin Skelly, Fire Aware CEO, said: “At a time of increasing concern for the safety of the public who use our buildings and spaces, the fire safety industry is under increasing scrutiny and those with a duty of care should understand this is more than a job, it is a vocation.

“We believe there is enough legislation to ensure safety if they are understood and followed.

“We have specialists who can help guide anyone in the supply chain around some of this new legislation because it can be challenging given its complexity and scale.”

Legislative changes driving demand for guidance

Fire Aware highlighted that key changes under the Building Safety Act require data collection for information at defined stages of construction projects.

The organisation also noted recent amendments to Approved Document B.

It pointed to new regulations for Residential Evacuation Plans that are due to come into effect in 2026.

Fire Aware said its specialist members act as technical guidance experts for organisations needing support with these requirements.

The educators are expected to provide training on fire safety and management tailored to the roles and contexts of different duty holders.

Training is designed to reflect the needs of those working in design, construction, product supply, building management and property ownership.

Moral responsibility and culture in the supply chain

Fire Aware described itself as an expanding fire safety industry body with a focus on the moral responsibilities of those working in the fire safety supply chain.

The organisation said this focus covers designers, developers, asset owners, managers and other stakeholders involved in building projects and occupied premises.

It aims to influence culture in the built environment by linking technical compliance with a declared duty of care towards building users.

Fire Aware plans to do this through a series of charters that set out how member companies commit to behave in their work.

The charters are intended to frame how members approach safety decisions, interactions with partners and service delivery.

Fire Aware described itself as a recognised membership body serving the built environment and related sectors with a shared aim of working and trading to best practice standards in the interests of public safety.

Practical relevance for duty holders and specifiers

The introduction of Fire Aware Educators is directly aimed at designers, main contractors, domestic trades and material suppliers who need support in interpreting current fire safety legislation.

These educators may provide training and technical guidance at key points in the design and construction process, helping duty holders understand data collection duties under the Building Safety Act and changes to Approved Document B.

Building management teams, hotel and leisure operators and commercial and private landlords are identified as further groups that can access guidance on Residential Evacuation Plans ahead of the new regulations taking effect in 2026.

Asset owners and managers within the built environment can use the Fire Aware charters as a framework when commissioning work or selecting partners, aligning contractual expectations with declared duty of care commitments.

Local authorities and other public bodies engaging with Fire Aware members will be able to reference the same charters when assessing how suppliers intend to meet best practice standards.

Collaboration the missing link in Building Safety Act compliance, says Etex

Etex to discuss early collaboration for Building Safety Act compliance

Etex Building Performance will use this year’s London Build event to highlight how early collaboration can support compliance with the Building Safety Act.

The company said its Siniat and Promat brands will focus on the role of test data in improving specification accuracy during project design.

Siniat is sponsoring the Fire Safety Stage at the event, which will host industry discussions on façade design, digital tools and balancing fire risk with sustainability.

Panel discussion on early-stage collaboration

Siniat’s Head of Specification, Steve Warriner, will take part in a panel discussion examining how collaboration during early design can help project teams address fire risk and compliance.

According to Etex, the session will bring together manufacturers, engineers, architects and principal designers to explore how joined-up working can help meet Building Safety Act requirements.

The company said the discussion aims to improve understanding of how early engagement between stakeholders can support smoother progress through Gateway 2 and reduce project delays.

Industry experts joining the panel

Warriner will be joined by Gary Neal, Head of Fire Risk Management at Skanska UK; Neal Morgan-Collins, Director and Head of Design Delivery Unit at Scott Brownrigg; Sun-Mee Ban, Principal Design Manager at Wates; and Amy Cooper, Senior Fire Safety Business Partner at Home Group.

Warriner said: “There has been a huge amount of discussion around the implementation of the Building Safety Act, and the impact this will have on building design.

“It is clear that the demands of the gateway system require accessible, accurate data to demonstrate compliance.

“The key to getting a full picture at the start of a project, and to avoid delays down the line, is through collaboration with all key stakeholders.

“This means close involvement of manufacturers to provide up-to-date, classified test data, and also to take responsibility for the details that they issue.

“This is a key shift in approach where specification of construction products has previously been more fluid.

“The spotlight is on specification, and the need for that to be right first time.

“This panel discussion will focus on how that works in practice, what the industry needs to see and what best practice looks like going forward to ensure compliance, especially in life critical safety such as passive fire protection.”

Event details and exhibition presence

London Build will take place at Olympia London on Tuesday 19 and Wednesday 20 November 2025.

The event will bring together contractors, developers, architects, housebuilders, procurement teams, specifiers and engineers from across the construction industry.

Etex confirmed that experts from both Promat and Siniat will be available at Stand O50 to discuss testing requirements for passive fire protection and structural integrity.

Implications for construction design and safety professionals

The discussion led by Etex, Siniat and Promat will be directly relevant to architects, principal designers, fire engineers and specification professionals working under the Building Safety Act framework.

The focus on early collaboration highlights how manufacturers’ classified test data can inform safer and more compliant designs at the planning stage.

For contractors and compliance officers, the insights shared at London Build will demonstrate how early engagement across disciplines could streamline Gateway 2 approval and prevent costly redesigns or project delays.

The participation of fire risk managers and design leaders also positions the event as a forum for practical strategies to meet evolving legal and technical requirements in fire safety design.

What Passive Fire Design still gets wrong and how ASFP addresses it

ASFP launches course to strengthen Passive Fire Design across the built environment

The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has developed a Passive Fire Protection Design Awareness Course in response to challenges with specification and design in the built environment, the organisation said.

According to the ASFP, the course addresses design-stage decisions that can lead to recurring and costly issues during construction and installation.

The organisation added that the training is available now.

The ASFP stated that the focus is on correct design choices for passive fire materials and systems.

It said the programme is aimed at improving understanding of technical and regulatory drivers for Passive Fire Design.

The organisation indicated that the aim is to support better decisions that improve fire safety and long-term performance.

Early design decisions drive later risk

The ASFP said early-stage choices can create problems at key interfaces during build and fit-out.

It pointed to service penetrations through fire-resisting compartment walls as a frequent source of error.

The organisation also cited integration between structural fire protection and compartmentation systems as an area where coordination often breaks down.

It noted that such issues can lead to additional cost and remedial work.

The ASFP positioned the new course as a route to reduce these known risks through better design understanding.

Course content focuses on interfaces

The ASFP said participants will examine common design issues including insufficient proof of concept.

It added that poor coordination of interfaces will be covered in detail.

The organisation said the course addresses the use of incompatible materials that can compromise fire performance.

It stated that the training explains the difference between insulation and integrity requirements within passive systems.

The ASFP confirmed that risks linked to overcladding intumescent-coated structural steelwork are included.

It noted that this content is intended to align design assumptions with tested performance.

Roles and responsibilities highlighted throughout

The ASFP said the training outlines responsibilities for designers, specifiers, contractors and building owners.

It added that correct design, installation and maintenance are presented as shared duties.

The organisation stated that the course reflects on how regulatory frameworks shape those duties.

It said the objective is to clarify who does what at each stage to maintain fire performance.

The ASFP indicated that clearer role definition can reduce coordination failures at interfaces.

Regulatory context and course availability

The ASFP said the programme reflects on how the Building Safety Act influences responsibilities and compliance standards.

It added that the course positions design choices within this regulatory context.

The organisation confirmed the Design Awareness Course is available now.

It stated that participants should gain a clearer view of the technical challenges driving good Passive Fire Design.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

Architects, building services engineers and fire engineers can use the ASFP course to address early-stage design decisions that later cause interface failures at service penetrations and compartment walls.

Specifiers and system installers can review proof of concept requirements to avoid pairing incompatible materials that compromise fire performance.

Structural engineers and steelwork contractors can examine the stated risks of overcladding intumescent-coated members and align choices with tested performance.

Contractors and facility managers can clarify the separation between insulation and integrity requirements so installed systems meet the intended fire-resistance outcomes.

Building owners can understand how the Building Safety Act frames responsibilities for design, installation and maintenance across the asset lifecycle.

Training officers can schedule participation now because the ASFP has confirmed the course is available.

New Promat study outlines best fire protection for structural steel buildings

Promat publishes whitepaper on protecting structural steel

Promat has published a new whitepaper analysing the most effective methods for protecting structural steel from fire.

The company said structural steel is now a widely used construction material that must be protected to maintain its load-bearing capacity during a fire.

According to Promat, the whitepaper compares fire protection board systems with specialist intumescent coatings, identifying where each option offers advantages for specific building types and design goals.

The document also discusses how increased data requirements under the Building Safety Act have driven demand for clearer evidence of performance.

Report reviews guidance under Building Regulations

Promat explained that the paper, titled Protecting structural steel: Fire board vs intumescent paint, focuses on the application of Part B of the Building Regulations and the Association for Fire Protection’s best practice guidance.

The company said it translates technical requirements into real-world building scenarios, reviewing how both systems perform in compartmented structures and in open-plan designs.

Promat added that the document highlights the importance of maintaining compartmentation in steel-framed buildings so that any fire remains contained within a defined area.

The company noted that while structural steel is non-combustible, it can lose its strength when exposed to extreme heat and must therefore be adequately protected under Approved Document B.

Promat calls for informed design and specification

Joshua Slack, Commercial Director at Promat UK, said: “Modern methods of building continue to evolve, and structural steel is now a leading choice in construction.

“For structural steel the need to maintain structural integrity should a fire break out is critical.

“Correctly specified Passive Fire Protection will protect steel from the rapid spread of fire for a set amount of time, allowing the blaze to be tackled by firefighters.

“With different options of passive fire protection and extensive testing available it is vital that this is supported by a clear understanding of how different methods and products will perform if needed.

“In publishing this whitepaper we aim to open the discussion and raise awareness of the best systems for use in different structural steel applications and identify what best practice looks like – and how this can be evidenced by up-to-date test data.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The whitepaper provides detailed comparisons of fire protection systems that are directly relevant to architects, fire engineers and building services professionals responsible for specifying materials under the Building Regulations.

It also offers guidance for fire-protection contractors and compliance officers involved in maintaining compartmentation and verifying system performance data under the Building Safety Act.

For those overseeing passive fire-protection design in commercial and industrial projects, the document serves as a technical resource for selecting the most appropriate system based on project type and required fire resistance.

Draft competence guidance sets framework for built environment organisations

Consultation opens on draft competence guide for organisations

The Fire Sector Confederation has confirmed the release of a draft guidance document setting out how organisations in the built environment should manage competence under the Building Safety Act 2022.

The publication, titled Managing Competence in the Built Environment: A Guide, was developed by the Industry Task and Finish Group (ITFG) in collaboration with the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) of the Building Safety Regulator.

It is now open for public consultation until 10 November 2025.

According to the Confederation, the document provides a high-level framework to help organisations design and evidence competence management systems that meet ICC principles.

It explains how companies can define, assess, and improve competence across all stages of the building lifecycle – from design and construction to occupation and ongoing management.

The guidance is described as a practical reference for creating proportionate arrangements to ensure individuals, teams and supply chains are demonstrably competent.

Framework built around 15 industry competence principles

The draft sets out fifteen principles agreed by the ICC that describe what organisations must do to plan, support and maintain competence over time.

These principles include establishing a clear scope of activities, setting competence criteria, managing recruitment and assessment processes, monitoring performance, addressing failures, and conducting regular audits and reviews.

They also cover specific responsibilities such as ensuring subcontractor capability, managing change, and maintaining accurate records of competence within a structured management system.

Each principle includes practical steps and diagnostic questions to help organisations apply the framework proportionately, whether operating as a major contractor or a small practice.

The guidance emphasises that competence must be actively managed rather than assumed, and that responsibility rests as much with organisational systems as with individual qualifications or experience.

The fifteen principles explained

  1. Purpose and scope: This principle requires organisations to define exactly what activities they undertake and the boundaries of their capability. It involves identifying relevant legal, regulatory and contractual obligations and ensuring that work remains within those limits. A clearly defined purpose and scope allows the organisation to understand where it is competent to act and where additional expertise or control may be needed.
  2. Establish competence criteria: Organisations must determine the knowledge, skills, experience and behaviours needed for each role. These criteria should be proportionate to the level of responsibility and risk associated with the task. Using recognised frameworks such as BS 8670-1 or PAS 8671–8673 helps ensure that competence standards are clear, consistent and aligned with industry expectations.
  3. Decide processes and methods: This principle focuses on designing structured and repeatable processes for planning, assessing and maintaining competence. Organisations should determine how competence will be evidenced and documented, integrating these arrangements into existing management systems where possible to ensure a consistent approach across all operations.
  4. Select and recruit staff: Recruitment and selection processes must be based on verified competence. Appointments should be made only when individuals meet the defined role requirements, supported by qualifications, references or professional registration. Induction and probationary reviews provide additional assurance that competence is demonstrated in practice.
  5. Determine workforce competence: Once staff are in post, their competence must be assessed through observation, evaluation and feedback. This step ensures that individuals are performing to the required standard and identifies any gaps in capability. Regular assessment helps organisations allocate resources effectively and maintain safe operations.
  6. Develop competence: Competence is not static and must be developed continuously. Training, mentoring and supervised practice should be used to build knowledge and strengthen professional judgement. Development programmes should focus on measurable improvement, ensuring that learning translates into competent behaviour in the workplace.
  7. Assign responsibilities: Work should only be allocated to people who have demonstrated competence for the specific task. Role boundaries and supervision levels must be clearly defined so that individuals understand what they are authorised to do. Effective task allocation prevents staff from working beyond their capability and supports safe decision-making.
  8. Monitor competence: Regular monitoring ensures that competence remains current as roles, technology and regulations evolve. Supervision, audits and performance reviews help identify where standards may be slipping or where further development is required. This continuous oversight maintains assurance that work is being carried out safely and correctly.
  9. Deal with failures: Organisations must have procedures for responding to competence-related failures or performance concerns. Investigations should establish whether shortcomings stem from individual capability, supervision, or systemic factors. Lessons learned from these events should be used to improve training, processes and management oversight.
  10. Manage assessors and managers: Those who evaluate or oversee competence must be competent themselves. Assessors, supervisors and managers need appropriate training and experience to make fair, evidence-based judgements. Regular calibration and review of their work help maintain consistency and reliability across the organisation.
  11. Manage sub-contractor competence: All subcontractors and suppliers must meet equivalent competence standards to those expected of direct employees. Organisations should verify their capability before engagement and monitor performance throughout the contract period. Clear contractual terms should specify competence requirements and audit rights.
  12. Manage information: Accurate and accessible information underpins all competence management activities. Organisations must maintain reliable records of assessments, qualifications and training. These records should be kept up to date, stored securely and used to inform workforce planning and continuous improvement.
  13. Manage change: Changes in legislation, technology, personnel or structure can alter competence needs. Organisations must assess the impact of these changes and update competence profiles, training plans and procedures accordingly. Managing change proactively ensures that capability keeps pace with new demands and risks.
  14. Audit: Auditing provides independent assurance that competence management systems are working effectively. Reviews should check compliance with internal policies, legal duties and best practice standards. Findings from audits must be recorded, acted upon and used to drive improvement.
  15. Review: Regular management reviews evaluate whether competence arrangements remain suitable and effective. Drawing on data from audits, incidents and staff feedback, reviews identify opportunities for refinement. This process supports continuous improvement and helps sustain a strong culture of competence across the organisation.

Building Safety Act context and proportional application

The Fire Sector Confederation explained that the document aligns with duties introduced under the Building Safety Act, which requires dutyholders and accountable persons to demonstrate capability and competence in fulfilling safety obligations.

The guidance outlines how these legal requirements can be translated into day-to-day organisational practices.

It introduces the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) model, a cycle commonly used in ISO 9001 and ISO 45001 management systems, to support continuous improvement in competence.

Large and complex organisations can integrate the guidance into existing certified management systems, while smaller businesses can adopt simpler proportionate arrangements such as defined role profiles, supervision processes and competence registers.

The guide also identifies supporting standards including BS 8670-1, PAS 8671-8673, and BS 8674, alongside relevant Health and Safety Executive publications and quality-management frameworks.

Review process, consultation and next steps

The consultation period will run until 10 November 2025.

A webinar on 30 October from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. will introduce the draft document and answer questions from stakeholders involved in competence management.

The session is open to all interested professionals and will provide an overview of the guidance’s objectives and structure.

Following consultation, the ITFG and ICC will review the feedback and complete a technical verification process before publishing the final version as an open-source document.

The Confederation said that once complete, the guide will provide a shared reference point for demonstrating organisational capability, supporting consistency and transparency across the built environment sector.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The guidance is directly applicable to fire safety officers, consultants, risk assessors, building owners and dutyholders responsible for demonstrating compliance with the Building Safety Act 2022.

It offers a clear model for defining competence standards within fire safety roles, recording professional development, and verifying supplier and subcontractor capability.

For those managing multi-disciplinary teams, the framework helps align recruitment, training and supervision practices with regulatory expectations.

It also provides practical templates and checklists that can assist in preparing evidence for regulators, clients or insurers.

Adopting the framework will allow organisations involved in fire design, construction and management to show that competence is both planned and maintained as part of a continuous assurance process.

New fire safety laws introduce compliance challenges for organisations

Low awareness among professionals on fire safety law changes

WorkNest has reported that many organisations risk non-compliance with recent fire safety law changes, as over half of health and safety professionals are unclear on the details.

Polling conducted by WorkNest found that only 2% of respondents felt confident about the implications of the Building Safety Act 2022, which became fully effective in April 2024.

The amendments update Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) requirements, introduce ‘accountable’ and ‘competent’ person roles, and strengthen the authority of enforcement bodies.

Jeff Watkins, Head of Fire Safety at WorkNest, said: “These amendments follow on from the Grenfell Tower disaster’s Hackett Review, which also resulted in the Building Safety Act 2022.

“That Act has only been fully implemented for less than a year and those in the residential and construction industries particularly will have already been dedicating time and resources to it.

“However, there’s even more to be aware of now with regards to fire safety.”

Key fire safety amendments in the Building Safety Act 2022

The recent changes, introduced under Article 156 of the Building Safety Act 2022, modify FRA requirements and fire safety responsibilities.

The adjustments include clarifications on identifying and informing ‘Responsible Persons’ to improve coordination between stakeholders.

Full FRA documentation is now required instead of just a summary of significant findings.

Fire safety arrangements must include improved access to information for residents.

There is also a focus on the competence of fire risk assessors.

A new British standard is in draft form and is expected to be introduced this year to define the qualifications needed for conducting FRAs.

Building safety regulations introduce new construction requirements

The revisions include updates to Approved Document B (Fire Safety), affecting new developments.

New requirements mandate staircase, sprinkler, and lift shaft standards in all new buildings.

Additionally, the UK has adopted European standards for fire resistance materials, which will influence future construction projects.

These updates are intended to align fire safety regulations with modern construction practices and ensure that new developments meet stricter safety standards.

Government focus on fire safety reforms continues

WorkNest highlighted that fire safety remains a priority for the UK government, with ongoing regulatory developments.

Jeff Watkins added: “Fire safety is high on the Government agenda as it should be.

“We’re seeing new regulatory bodies being formed and an ongoing overhaul of legacy laws so it’s important that those in the building construction sector and all health and safety practitioners across the board keep on top of reforms.”

With new requirements affecting various sectors, businesses are urged to stay informed and update their fire safety protocols to ensure compliance.

New fire safety laws introduce compliance challenges for organisations: Summary

WorkNest has reported that organisations are at risk of non-compliance with recent fire safety law changes, with many health and safety professionals unclear on the amendments.

The Building Safety Act 2022, which came into full effect in April 2024, includes updates to Fire Risk Assessment requirements, introduces new responsible roles, and strengthens enforcement authorities.

Key changes under Article 156 include clearer definitions of ‘Responsible Persons,’ mandatory full FRA documentation, improved access to fire safety information for residents, and new competency requirements for fire risk assessors.

Updates to Approved Document B introduce new construction standards for staircases, sprinklers, lift shafts, and fire-resistant materials in all new developments.

The UK government continues to prioritise fire safety reform, with new regulatory bodies and further legislative changes expected.

WorkNest advises businesses in the residential and construction industries to stay informed and adapt their safety protocols accordingly.

CSCS updates Labourer and Trainee card requirements under Building Safety Act

Changes to Labourer card validity and renewal criteria

CSCS has announced changes to the Labourer and Trainee cards from 1 February to align with competency expectations under the Building Safety Act.

The revisions aim to encourage new entrants to start on a ‘Red’ card with a recognised training pathway.

The Labourer card’s initial validity will now be two years instead of five.

To renew for five years, operatives must provide evidence of employment as a labourer.

Additionally, the CITB Health, Safety and Environment Test validity will extend to three years, allowing continued use for card renewal.

Revised eligibility criteria for Trainee card

CSCS has introduced a simplified pathway for individuals with prior training to obtain a Trainee card.

Those who have completed an approved Level 2 or higher occupation-related non-competence qualification will now be eligible for a two-year Trainee card.

The updated requirements aim to make it easier for new entrants with relevant qualifications to access the industry while ensuring workers meet competency standards.

CSCS has provided a flowchart detailing the available routes to a Trainee card.

Industry Accreditation cards no longer valid

CSCS confirmed that all cards issued via Industry Accreditation have now expired.

Individuals previously holding these cards must obtain a qualification to move onto the appropriate card.

To support this transition, CITB funding has been extended until 31 March 2026 to help individuals gain the required qualifications.

This extension provides additional time for those affected to meet the updated competency standards.

Supporting compliance with the Building Safety Act

The updates to CSCS card requirements are part of broader efforts to align with the Building Safety Act’s competency expectations.

The changes are designed to ensure construction workers meet the necessary standards and encourage structured training and qualification pathways.

The adjustments aim to improve competency verification and maintain safety and compliance in the construction industry.

More details on the revised card requirements are available through CSCS.

CSCS updates Labourer and Trainee card requirements under Building Safety Act: Summary

CSCS has announced changes to its Labourer and Trainee card requirements, effective 1 February, to align with the Building Safety Act.

The Labourer card will now be valid for two years, with a five-year renewal available to those proving employment in a labouring role.

The CITB Health, Safety and Environment Test validity has been extended to three years.

A new pathway has been introduced for Trainee cards, allowing individuals with an approved Level 2 or higher qualification to obtain a two-year card.

CSCS has confirmed that all Industry Accreditation cards have expired, and funding for qualification support is available until 31 March 2026.

The changes are part of efforts to ensure workers meet competency standards and follow recognised training pathways.

AEI Cables calls for Building Safety Act to be widely understood

AEI Cables has said the performance of cabling in critical fire safety systems needs to be clearly understood as part of the new Building Safety Act.

The new Building Safety Act makes requirements for higher-risk buildings which are those deemed to be of at least 18 metres in height or at least seven storeys containing at least two residential units.

The Act updates guidelines for construction and management of higher risk buildings and covers the whole supply chain including electrical safety systems and cabling. The current British Standard Code of Practice BS 8519 identifies six categories of power and control cables with survival times of 30, 60 or 120 minutes. 

General Manager, AEI Cables, Stuart Dover’s statement

Stuart Dover, General Manager of AEI Cables, said: “There is a lot of new detail in the legislation and we welcome the requirements of the Act. However, there is a pressing need to understand the part played by electrical safety systems and the cabling that operates these systems.

“There is good information available through the cabling industry including our own technical advisers about cable testing, cable classifications and cable performance in real fire conditions.”

The systems in these buildings powered by electrical cables, including smoke and heat extraction systems, assist fire services in firefighting and a safe evacuation in the case of life safety.

The Building Safety Regulator

The Building Safety Regulator will oversee the safety and performance of all buildings, as well as having a special focus on high-rise buildings. It will promote competence and organisational capability within the sector including for building control professionals and tradespeople.

Building owners should now have their building safety regime in place and any occupied higher-risk buildings should be registered with the Building Safety Regulator.

New legislation needs to be welcomed, says AEI Cables: Summary

AEI Cables has called for the updates to the Building Safety Act to be widely understood. AEI’S General Manager said that there is a pressing need to understand the part played by electrical safety systems and the cabling that operates these systems.

Building safety act delays impact high-rise construction approvals

Delays in Building Safety Act procedures stall high-rise residential construction

The Fire Industry Association (FIA) has highlighted delays caused by the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) in its latest briefing.

The act introduced Gateway 2 and Gateway 3 regulatory checkpoints to enhance safety in high-risk buildings (HRBs), primarily residential developments over 18 metres tall.

Gateway 2 mandates design approval before construction begins, while Gateway 3 requires final clearance upon project completion.

According to the FIA, these processes have led to significant project delays, exacerbating the housing shortage.

Only 6% of new building applications meet the statutory 12-week approval timeline.

Challenges in gaining Gateway 2 approval

The FIA briefing identifies several issues with Gateway 2.

Submission requirements lack clarity, often resulting in excessive documentation at early project stages.

Moreover, pre-submission consultations are not permitted, forcing designers to make costly adjustments after rejections.

Designers also face restrictions on direct communication with Registered Building Inspectors (RBI) during reviews, which hinders resolution of technical disagreements.

These procedural inefficiencies discourage HRB construction, with developers reducing project sizes to bypass Gateway 2.

Implications for construction and housing

Delays in Gateway 2 approvals are limiting new construction projects, especially in urban areas where high-rise developments are critical for housing supply.

The FIA reports that changes to design plans during construction, classified as Major Changes, require BSR approval to avoid criminal penalties, further complicating project timelines.

Gateway 3 presents additional challenges as completed buildings cannot be occupied until the process is finalised.

Delays at this stage risk leaving new buildings unoccupied for months.

FIA recommendations for process improvements

The FIA recommends simplifying Gateway 2 and Gateway 3 to reduce inefficiencies.

Suggested changes include phased submissions, where initial approvals focus on general arrangements and high-level documents, allowing more detailed designs later.

Clearer guidance on documentation requirements is also advised to reduce wasted resources.

The FIA emphasises maintaining high standards of competency and quality control while addressing procedural issues to support the government’s housing targets.

Building safety act delays impact high-rise construction approvals: Summary

The FIA briefing highlights delays in HRB construction due to stringent Gateway 2 and Gateway 3 processes under the Building Safety Act 2022.

Key issues include unclear submission requirements, limited pre-submission consultations, and inefficient review procedures.

These challenges hinder project approvals, with only 6% of applications meeting statutory deadlines.

Developers are reducing project sizes to avoid the process, exacerbating housing shortages.

The FIA proposes phased submissions and clearer guidance to streamline procedures while maintaining safety standards.