FBU says firefighters face “impossible choice” as safety gear and jobs fall short

Union highlights lack of wildfire PPE

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has warned that firefighters tackling wildfires across the UK were deployed without specialist personal protective equipment.

According to the FBU, recent wildfires in Edinburgh, North Yorkshire and Holt Heath in Dorset exposed gaps in equipment and training across services.

The union reported that the Holt Heath fire drew resources from 17 fire and rescue services, including Avon, Dorset and Wiltshire, Gloucestershire, Berkshire and Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.

It said that many crews attended without lightweight wildfire PPE.

The union added that some firefighters had only received online training or none at all before being sent into wildfire conditions.

Increased risks to firefighter safety

The FBU stated that the absence of specialist PPE forced crews to make unsafe choices in extreme heat.

It warned that firefighters faced elevated risks of heat stroke, exhaustion and burns during extended wildfire deployments.

According to the union, some crews removed heavier structural PPE to reduce overheating, leaving their skin exposed.

It said that this demonstrated the urgent requirement for national standards on equipment and training.

Call for investment and national standards

Adam Taylor, Fire Brigades Union national officer, said: “Wildfires are increasingly a fact of life in many areas now that our climate is rapidly heating, but too often firefighters are not being provided with the basic equipment and training they need to keep themselves and the public safe.

“Without proper PPE, firefighters face an impossible choice between heat stroke and exposing themselves to burns, either from flames or the sun.

“We urgently need investment to sort out this problem. We also need national standards on equipment and training, as well as response times and crewing levels.

“Labour promised to safeguard workers’ rights and to rebuild fire service standards – it’s time for this government to deliver.”

Concerns from firefighters on deployment

Harry Brant, FBU Leicestershire brigade secretary, said: “We are proud of the six firefighters who were deployed from Leicestershire to help tackle the wildfire at Holt Heath.

“But it is not ideal that they were sent without access to proper wildfire PPE to aid them in the arduous conditions they faced.

“Without lightweight wildfire PPE, firefighters face an increased risk of heatstroke, burns and exhaustion.

“Our members travelled more than a hundred miles – the least they deserve is the tools they need to keep themselves and the public safe.

“We need national standards, so that all firefighters can go to work knowing they will have the right equipment, wherever they are working.”

FBU warns of impact from proposed cuts

The Fire Brigades Union has also criticised government plans to cut fire and rescue service budgets.

It said the decision comes just over a year after Labour took office.

The union warned that the reductions could lead to the loss of 2,300 firefighter jobs across the UK.

It explained that the cuts followed a below-inflation funding settlement for 2025–26.

Fire service capacity and climate pressures

The National Fire Chiefs Council has modelled a funding gap of £102m, equal to around 1,500 firefighter posts, not including London or rural services.

The FBU said that including those areas would increase the figure to 2,300 posts at risk.

It added that the service has already lost 12,000 firefighter roles since 2010, equating to one in five.

According to the union, response times have lengthened and in some locations fire engines are mobilised without the full five-person crews needed to manage incidents safely.

It noted that these reductions come as climate-driven risks increase.

The union pointed to more frequent wildfires, floods and extreme weather across the UK, with around 900 wildfire incidents already recorded this year, surpassing 2022 totals.

FBU response to government proposals

Steve Wright, Fire Brigades Union general secretary, said: “It is simply disgraceful that the government is imposing cuts on this scale, having come to power promising change. The fire service is already on its knees after 15 years of austerity.

“Cuts to the emergency services will cost lives. It is a matter of time until someone dies – either because we don’t have the resources to reach them in time, or because cuts mean firefighters are being put in harm’s way.

“The UK has a record number of billionaires. The average FTSE 100 CEO takes three days to earn a firefighter’s whole annual salary. There is a clear alternative – introduce a wealth tax, rebuild our public services, and create an economy for workers.

“Time is running out for Labour to demonstrate that it can provide a meaningful alternative to Tory austerity. The government must think again about these cuts.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

For fire and safety professionals, the concerns raised by the FBU highlight operational risks and long-term challenges in the UK.

The absence of proper PPE and consistent training standards affects frontline safety during wildfire deployments.

At the same time, planned staffing cuts threaten the ability of services to maintain response levels while climate-related emergencies grow in scale and frequency.

The issues identified by the union emphasise the need for clear national standards, sustainable funding and policy measures that align resources with increasing demands.

FBU raises concerns over PPE shortages and budget cuts in UK fire services: Summary

The Fire Brigades Union has reported that firefighters in the UK were sent to wildfires without specialist PPE.

The union said some crews had only received limited or no training.

It stated that firefighters faced increased risks of heat stroke, burns and exhaustion.

The FBU called for national standards on equipment, training, crewing and response times.

The union also warned that government budget cuts could remove 2,300 firefighter posts.

It said this followed a below-inflation funding settlement for 2025–26.

The National Fire Chiefs Council has projected a £102m funding shortfall, excluding London and rural services.

The FBU noted that the service has already lost 12,000 firefighter jobs since 2010.

It said response times have lengthened and fire engines are sometimes mobilised with fewer than five crew members.

The union warned that cuts come as wildfire, flood and extreme weather incidents rise across the UK.

Fire services in England face £102m grant reduction

Government funding changes projected to cut fire service budgets

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has warned that fire and rescue authorities in England could face a real-terms funding cut of £102 million.

According to the NFCC, the reduction stems from Government proposals in the Spending Review and changes to the local government finance settlement.

Independent modelling commissioned by the organisation suggests that standalone fire and rescue authorities would lose the equivalent of around 1,500 wholetime firefighter posts over the next three years.

When London and county fire services are included, this number could rise to as many as 2,300 posts.

The NFCC said that council tax increases will not offset the anticipated cuts, especially when inflation and staff pay rises are taken into account.

NFCC concerns about service demand and workforce numbers

The NFCC explained that demand on fire and rescue services has grown while firefighter numbers have fallen sharply.

Data from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government shows that services in England responded to 600,185 incidents last year.

This represents an increase of 100,000 incidents, or 20 percent, compared to 2014.

At the same time, firefighter numbers have fallen by 25 percent since 2008, the equivalent of 11,000 wholetime firefighters.

The NFCC said this imbalance is placing pressure on already stretched services.

NFCC chair warns of community safety risks

NFCC Chair Phil Garrigan said: “I do recognise the Government has the unenviable task of balancing public finances and they face really tough choices when it comes to funding local services, but we have to confront how precarious a position fire and rescue finances are in right now.

“If I didn’t speak up, I would be letting down the fire and rescue service and, more importantly, the people we serve.

“I would also be letting the Government down as I would be allowing decisions to be made without highlighting the real and legitimate concerns we have – concerns for the public, and concerns for the safety of our firefighters who risk their lives every day.

“Fire and rescue services cannot continue to be expected to deliver more with less.

“We are already seeing demand rising, risks evolving, and our remit expanding – from tackling the effects of climate change to responding to increased blue light collaboration – all while firefighter numbers have fallen sharply.

“A failure to recognise these burdens and to forge ahead with the funding proposals as they stand would be incomprehensible.

“The safety of our communities depends on a funding settlement that matches the reality on the ground, and ensures we have the people, equipment and capability to protect the public.

“We can no longer just roll up our sleeves and get on with it, our silence will put lives at risk. We cannot allow our fire and rescue service to become the forgotten emergency service.”

Impact of the Fair Funding Review

The NFCC said that the upcoming Fair Funding Review 2.0 will determine how reduced central funds are distributed between fire and rescue authorities.

Under the proposed model, population size will be a key factor in calculating allocations.

The organisation explained that areas with faster population growth will receive a larger share of the reduced pot.

Areas with slower growth could face further reductions even if they contain higher levels of risk such as hazardous sites, high-rise housing, or areas of deprivation.

The NFCC stated that this redistribution approach risks destabilising services in many parts of England.

Local council tax increases unlikely to offset cuts

The NFCC noted that standalone fire and rescue authorities can raise their council tax precept by up to £5 per year for a band D property.

However, it added that this will not be enough to counterbalance funding reductions or meet inflation.

The organisation also explained that local political approval is required to apply these increases, meaning not all areas will secure the additional funds.

In some services, spending power could remain frozen or even fall in real terms despite the option to increase council tax.

The NFCC said this further exposes the reliance on central funding to maintain stable service levels.

NFCC calls for changes to funding approach

The NFCC has outlined a set of proposals it believes would protect the long-term resilience of fire and rescue services.

It is calling for funding to be protected in real terms, alongside uncapped council tax flexibility for all fire and rescue authorities.

The organisation also wants fire and rescue funding to be excluded from the Fair Funding Review until a risk-based formula is developed in consultation with the sector.

Other recommendations include a dedicated funding system similar to policing, recognising the national resilience role of fire and rescue services.

The NFCC is also calling for a full risk analysis before any funding formula changes are implemented.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The NFCC’s modelling and warnings are directly relevant to fire and safety professionals across the UK.

Funding decisions influence firefighter staffing levels, resource availability, equipment investment, and training capacity.

Professionals must understand how reductions in grant funding and reliance on council tax could affect operational readiness and long-term service resilience.

Awareness of these financial pressures is essential for anticipating changes to risk management and emergency response capacity in different regions.

NFCC highlights public safety risks from reduced funding: Summary

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has projected a £102 million real-terms cut to standalone fire and rescue authorities.

The modelling suggests this could equal the loss of 1,500 wholetime firefighter posts, rising to 2,300 when London and county services are included.

The NFCC said that council tax increases will not offset the cuts when inflation and staff pay are factored in.

Data shows fire and rescue services in England attended 600,185 incidents last year, an increase of 100,000 compared with 2014.

Firefighter numbers have fallen by 25 percent since 2008, equal to 11,000 wholetime posts.

The Fair Funding Review 2.0 will redistribute reduced funds based on population growth.

The NFCC said this could leave higher-risk areas with slower growth facing further funding reductions.

Local increases in council tax precepts are not guaranteed due to political approval requirements.

The NFCC is calling for funding protection, risk-based allocation, and a dedicated system similar to policing.

Chair Phil Garrigan warned that failure to act risks public safety and operational capacity.

New data reveals scale of job cuts in fire and rescue services across UK

New figures obtained by the Fire Brigades Union reveal that 12,000 firefighter posts have been lost to cuts since 2010, leaving the UK without the resilience needed to guarantee public safety. (1)

One in five firefighter jobs (21%) across the UK have been axed in the last 14 years. One in three fire control staff, who take emergency calls and mobilise crews, have been cut.

Meanwhile, response times to life-threatening fires have slowed by three minutes, from 6.11 minutes in 1995 to 9.13 minutes in 2023.

England was the worst impacted, with 10,000 jobs cut (22%). In the same period, Scotland lost 1,400 firefighters (18%), Wales lost 500 (13%), and Northern Ireland lost over 200 (12%).

12 fire and rescue services in England have lost a quarter or more of their workforce. The worst hit service was Buckinghamshire, which has been cut by over 40%.

The FBU has also found that 4,000 firefighters have both a full-time and an on-call contract, meaning that they will be counted as two firefighters in the data. This double counting means that the numbers employed and available at any one time are significantly lower than official figures suggest.

Matt Wrack, Fire Brigades Union general secretary said:
“Fourteen years of austerity have devastated the fire and rescue service. Every region has been hit, with 12,000 firefighters lost to cuts across the UK.
“With flooding, wildfires and storms on the rise as a result of the climate emergency, firefighters are being asked to do more with less. 999 response times are slower than ever before, putting homes and lives at risk.
“To protect the public, Labour must invest in the fire and rescue service as a matter of urgency.”

(1) A full breakdown of the data by fire and rescue service, obtained by Freedom of Information requests, can be found below.
(2) According to annual Home Office data on average response times Fire statistics data tables – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Fire and Rescue Service 2010 numbers 2024 numbers Number of firefighters cut % decrease

Scotland 7,712 6,306 -1,406 -18%
Northern Ireland 1,994 1,762 -232 -12%
Mid and West Wales 1,196 1,119 -77 -6%
North Wales 883 724 -159 -18%
South Wales 1,666 1,404 -262 -16%
Cleveland 629 409 -220 -35%
Durham 579 512 -67 -12%
Northumberland 430 322 -108 -25%
Tyne and Wear 940 637 -303 -32%
Humberside 1,053 833 -220 -21%
North Yorkshire 773 599 -174 -23%
South Yorkshire 936 748 -188 -20%
West Yorkshire 1,720 1,103 -617 -36%
Cheshire 746 660 -86 -12%
Cumbria 738 490 -248 -34%
Greater Manchester 1,992 1,397 -595 -30%
Lancashire 1,336 1,070 -266 -20%
Merseyside 1,204 1,010 -194 -16%
North West Fire Control 0 69 69 N/A
Derbyshire 779 734 -45 -6%
Leicestershire 796 624 -172 -22%
Lincolnshire 757 612 -145 -19%
Northamptonshire 575 410 -165 -29%
Nottinghamshire 973 651 -322 -33%
Hereford & Worcester 723 622 -101 -14%
Shropshire 573 485 -88 -15%
Staffordshire 930 695 -235 -25%
Warwickshire 457 429 -28 -6%
West Midlands 1,933 1,417 -516 -27%
Bedfordshire 499 458 -41 -8%
Cambridgeshire 695 535 -160 -23%
Essex 1,415 1,171 -244 -17%
Hertfordshire 842 725 -117 -14%
Norfolk 861 781 -80 -9%
Suffolk 782 595 -187 -24%
London 6,018 4,669 -1,349 -22%
Berkshire 579 464 -115 -20%
Buckinghamshire 625 369 -256 -41%
East Sussex 734 552 -182 -25%
Hampshire & IW 1,837 1,402 -435 -24%
Kent 1,663 1,189 -474 -29%
Oxfordshire 652 563 -89 -14%
Surrey 753 621 -132 -18%
West Sussex 825 632 -193 -23%
Avon 970 750 -220 -23%
Cornwall 647 576 -71 -11%
Devon and Somerset 2,058 1,688 -370 -17%
Dorset and Wiltshire 1,297 1,007 -290 -22%
Gloucestershire 523 403 -120 -23%
UK 59,298 47,003 -12,295 -21%

Data is from Home Office, Stats Wales, SFRS, NIFRS and FBU Freedom of information requests. 2024 figures except for Nottinghamshire, London, Avon, who failed to provide these.

Frontline fire service cuts in Nottinghamshire reversed

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has won a reversal of cuts of £2m to the fire service in Nottingham. The cuts which were announced in autumn 2022 would have seen West Bridgford fire station closed at night whilst London Road and Stockhill stations would have lost firefighters and fire appliances.

The victory is the result of a campaign of lobbying by the FBU. On 23 September 2022, members of the union attended a meeting of the Combined Fire Authority, which is chaired by Cllr Michael Payne where they called for the proposals to be shelved and called for the authority and the chief fire officer to join with members of the union in calling for greater investment. The fire authority moved the proposals through with only a few notable objectors voting against.

following the meeting members of the FBU, alongside Cllr Steve Battlemuch, began to mobilise more widely, with firefighters and supporters having a presence on the streets of Nottinghamshire campaigning against the proposed cuts.

The FBU also made the case for further investment in Westminster, demanding that the government increase funding to protect frontline services. The lobbying concluded with a meeting attended by MPs from across the county, alongside the FBU leadership, union members, the chief fire officer and the chair of the authority.

It has now been confirmed that the cuts will not take place.

‘A fantastic result’

Ben Selby, Assistant General Secretary elect of the Fire Brigades Union said: “This is a fantastic result for the people of Nottinghamshire. These cuts would have inevitably increased fire service response times, putting the lives of those that live and work in the affected areas at an increased risk.

“Since 2010, budgets have been attacked by central governments, with fire authorities doing little to protect their communities from cuts that can cost lives.

“This result is testament to the tireless work of members and officials of the FBU in Nottinghamshire. They knew what losing these services would mean for their communities, and fought to save them with everything they had.

“When many policy-makers and onlookers doubted that our members could secure additional funding, they ignored them and cracked on with their campaign. They should be immensely proud of the result.”