California to create public wildfire catastrophe model

by Breaking NewsWildland Fire

Legislation to create a fully transparent public wildfire catastrophe model was signed by California Governor Newsom on Friday 10 October.

The law will give consumers the ability to push back on secret wildfire risk algorithms insurance companies use to raise rates in California.

The legislation, SB 429, was authored by Senator Dave Cortese. It charges California universities and the Department of Insurance with creating the model and funding was approved in the 2025 budget.

Executive Director, Consumer Watchdog, Carmen Balber’s statement

Carmen Balber, Executive Director of Consumer Watchdog explained: “Homeowners are fed up with insurance companies’ black-box models that penalize consumers for fire risk but refuse to explain how they calculate it.

“Even when they do everything to protect their homes from wildfires homeowners face extreme price hikes or lose their insurance completely.

“A fully transparent wildfire model will level the playing field and empower consumers to keep their insurance and make their homes and communities safer.”

SB 429 requires full public access to all aspects of the wildfire catastrophe model, including all “documentation and programs” and “underlying data and algorithms” of the model.

Current regulations in California

Under current regulations, California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara specifically exempted insurance companies from disclosing the same information about the private black-box models they use to set insurance rates.

California regulations require home insurance companies to offer discounts to consumers who meet any of ten wildfire safety measures or who live in a certified wildfire safe community.

The discounts however are often negligible and insurance companies can avoid them by simply choosing not to sell a customer insurance. 

Balber concluded: “Consumers must be rewarded for making their homes – and by extension our communities – safer.

“Insurance companies should not be allowed to continue pushing all the cost of climate change on the public.”

California to create public wildfire catastrophe model: Summary

Legislation to create a fully transparent public wildfire catastrophe model was signed by California Governor Newsom on Friday 10 October.

Federal fire fighters bill proposes work-hour cap and pension reform

by Americas - Breaking NewsAssociations and OrganisationsFeatured News

Senators introduce bipartisan bill to support U.S. federal fire fighters

Senators Ruben Gallego and Bernie Moreno have introduced a bipartisan bill to cap weekly work hours for federal fire fighters and address longstanding issues with pension calculations.

According to the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), the legislation – titled the Federal Fire Fighters Families First Act – limits pre-scheduled work hours to 60 per week and changes how overtime is included in pension formulas.

The IAFF stated that federal fire fighters currently work 72 hours per week, with shift structures that limit rest and recovery between deployments.

The trade union said this has created long-term health, safety, and family wellbeing concerns for fire fighters across military bases, research sites, and other federal locations.

The proposed bill, introduced on 25 July 2025, complements a previously submitted House version, H.R. 759, sponsored by Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick and the late Gerry Connolly.

IAFF says excessive schedules are damaging fire fighters’ health

The IAFF has said that the current work schedules of federal fire fighters are putting their physical and mental health at risk.

General President Edward Kelly said: “Federal fire fighters are being pushed to the brink as they work gruelling schedules that jeopardise their health, safety, and well-being.

“That’s why the IAFF proudly supports the Federal Fire Fighters Families First Act – it caps excessive workweeks, fixes broken retirement rules, and honours the hours our members serve.”

He added: “Not only is this schedule physically demanding, but it also has a mental impact, as these fire fighters are forced to spend so much time away from their families.

“I want to thank Senators Gallego and Moreno for supporting these brave men and women – and their families.

“It’s time for U.S. government to recognise the sacrifices these fire fighters are making every day to protect our federal facilities.

“I urge Congress to pass this bipartisan legislation as quickly as possible.”

Weekly hour cap set at 60 under proposed legislation

The bill would limit pre-scheduled hours for federal fire fighters to 60 per week.

According to the IAFF, current schedules often require personnel to leave or return to work every 24 hours, with little opportunity for recovery.

Senator Ruben Gallego said: “Federal fire fighters protect our communities from wildfires and keep our veterans and service members safe.

“But right now, these brave men and women are forced to work gruelling hours at pay rates far below what other fire fighters make.”

He continued: “It’s unacceptable, and I’m proud to introduce bipartisan legislation to fix it.”

The IAFF explained that the new cap is intended to better align federal schedules with those of non-federal fire departments.

Pension calculations revised under the new bill

The proposed bill also addresses what the IAFF called “unjust penalties” in federal fire fighter pensions.

Currently, 26 percent of pre-scheduled overtime is excluded from retirement benefit calculations.

The IAFF stated that this exclusion reduces long-term earnings and adds to issues of burnout and attrition in federal fire services.

The organisation said the bill will ensure all pre-scheduled hours are included in pension formulae.

Senator Bernie Moreno said: “America’s fire fighters put their lives on the line every day to protect and save communities across the country.”

He added: “This legislation makes sure they and their families are fairly compensated for the incredible work they do and sacrifices they make.”

Companion bill already introduced in the U.S. House

The Senate bill serves as a companion to H.R. 759, introduced in January 2025 in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The earlier bill was brought forward by Representative Brian Fitzpatrick and Representative Gerry Connolly, who passed away earlier this year.

According to the IAFF, both versions aim to establish the same protections and benefits for federal fire fighters.

The association added that alignment between the House and Senate bills is intended to streamline the legislative process and build bipartisan support.

Federal fire fighters bill proposes work-hour cap and pension reform: Summary

Senators Gallego and Moreno introduced a bipartisan bill for federal fire fighters on 25 July 2025.

The bill is titled the Federal Fire Fighters Families First Act.

It proposes a cap of 60 hours per week for federal fire fighter schedules.

The International Association of Fire Fighters said current schedules average 72 hours per week.

The IAFF said these schedules negatively affect fire fighters’ health and wellbeing.

The bill would also change pension calculations for federal fire fighters.

It includes pre-scheduled overtime hours in retirement benefit formulas.

Currently, 26 percent of these hours are excluded from calculations, the IAFF said.

The new bill is the Senate version of House Resolution 759.

House Resolution 759 was introduced in January 2025.

It was sponsored by Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick and Gerry Connolly.

The IAFF has publicly endorsed both versions of the legislation.

The organisation has urged Congress to pass the bill.

New UK fire safety law targets online marketplaces selling unsafe products

by Featured NewsHealth and SafetySafety

UK law enacted to address fire risks from online sales

The UK Department for Business and Trade has announced the Royal Assent of the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, expanding fire safety enforcement powers in response to risks posed by lithium-ion batteries sold online.

The department said the new law aims to align online marketplaces with the same product safety requirements that apply to traditional retailers.

The change follows concern over a rising number of fires caused by unsafe e-bike and e-scooter batteries, often bought through digital platforms.

According to the Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), there were 211 reported fires involving these products in 2024, with 175 incidents reported by London Fire Brigade alone.

The new law will allow regulators to hold online marketplaces accountable for ensuring the safety of products sold through their platforms.

Requirements for online marketplaces under new framework

The UK Government intends to introduce specific obligations for online marketplaces in line with the Product Regulation and Metrology Act.

These obligations include preventing the sale of unsafe products, ensuring sellers meet safety responsibilities, providing product information to consumers, and supporting regulatory investigations.

The Office for Product Safety and Standards will continue its targeted activity, including oversight of button batteries, small magnets, and lithium-ion battery products.

The Government said these measures are designed to create a proportionate and balanced framework that supports both consumer safety and business growth.

According to the department, around 300,000 businesses operate in regulated product sectors across the UK, with a combined estimated turnover of £490 billion.

The OPSS’s public campaigns, such as the “Buy Safe, Be Safe” initiative and its December 2024 lithium battery guidance, will continue alongside the new enforcement approach.

Statements from ministers and safety advocates

Product Safety Minister Justin Madders said: “By giving regulators the teeth to clamp down on unsafe products, we’re ensuring people can shop with confidence whether online or on the high street.

“This will establish a level playing field and mean online marketplaces are held to the same high standards as bricks and mortar shops, ensuring we back businesses and protect consumers as part of our Plan for Change.”

Rocio Concha, Director of Policy and Advocacy at Which?, said: “Which? has campaigned for years to hold online marketplaces to the same standards as high street retailers. For too long, consumers have been exposed to dangerous – and in some cases lethal – products.

“The Product Regulation and Metrology Act has the potential to be a game changer for consumer safety. It paves the way for new laws to clarify and strengthen responsibilities for online marketplaces, which is crucial in the fight against the sale of dangerous products online.

“Following the bill’s Royal Assent, the government must act fast to tighten definitions of online marketplaces, introduce a clear duty so that online marketplaces are accountable for product safety, and empower regulators to issue heavy fines for those that fall short of the required standards.”

London Fire Brigade and safety groups support the legislation

London Fire Brigade Deputy Commissioner Charlie Pugsley said: “We are pleased that the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill (PRAM) has been granted Royal Assent.

“London Fire Brigade sees one e-bike or e-scooter fire every two days and we have long called for regulation to improve product safety and safeguards on online marketplaces to protect people from buying dangerous products that pose a fire risk.

“We welcome this new piece of legislation, which will better regulate unsafe products being sold and help to protect the public from unsafe products and particularly poor quality or non-compliant lithium battery products, which can present unique fire safety challenges.”

John Herriman, Chief Executive at the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, said: “Alongside the coalition, which included the British Toy and Hobby Association and Electrical Safety First, we welcome the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill gaining Royal Assent as a positive step forward in ensuring the UK maintains strong, modern protections for consumers.

“This legislation supports the vital work Trading Standards does in keeping unsafe and non-compliant products off the market, creating a fairer and safer trading environment for businesses and consumers alike.

“We look forward to working closely with government and stakeholders to ensure that the laws that follow, after further consultation, are implemented effectively and contributes to a robust, future-facing regulatory system that will support economic growth in the UK.”

Electrical Safety First welcomes new legislation and calls for strong follow-up regulations

Lesley Rudd, Chief Executive of Electrical Safety First, said the new law marks a turning point in product safety legislation.

Rudd said: “This legislation has the potential to transform our product safety laws, making them fit for the 21st century.

“We now have an opportunity to address new and emerging product safety risks – particularly the threat posed by substandard e-bike batteries, which continue to cause ferocious fires across the country, and the ‘wild west’ of online shopping, where dangerous goods are relentlessly sold.

“Whilst we welcome the Bill’s enactment and the speed at which the Government has moved, the forthcoming consultations must be bold, brave and robust to effectively tackle the serious risks posed by substandard e-bike batteries and dangerous goods sold online.

“These batteries and modified devices continue to cause life-threatening fires, injuring and tragically, in some cases, killing people in their homes.

“Strong new rules are urgently needed to keep poor-quality batteries and accessories off the market.

“Online marketplaces must finally be held legally responsible for the safety of products sold through their platforms.”

According to Electrical Safety First, it secured several amendments to the bill, including measures to improve transparency in assessing new risks, guaranteed rights to consultation, and a government commitment to regulate e-bike batteries.

The organisation said it has played a leading role in raising awareness of fire hazards from substandard lithium batteries.

Its 2022 report, Battery Breakdown, outlined the increasing risks associated with poor-quality e-bike batteries and proposed detailed policy interventions.

Electrical Safety First has also identified banned or unsafe batteries for sale on online platforms, including a UPP model linked to multiple fire incidents and found listed on Facebook Marketplace.

The charity is advocating for new mandatory safety standards for conversion kits and charging systems to address incompatibility risks and reduce battery-related fires.

It has also called for a legal redefinition of online marketplaces to make them formally accountable under UK safety law.

Economic and safety context for regulatory reform

The Government said the regulatory changes were designed to reflect the evolving nature of the marketplace and increasing dependence on online platforms.

The Office for Product Safety and Standards noted a steady rise in incidents involving lithium battery fires, many involving products bought online.

The new act formalises the ability of regulators to take proportionate action against sellers or marketplaces that allow unsafe goods to reach consumers.

This includes civil and criminal penalties where appropriate, and collaboration with trading standards and industry stakeholders to implement the law effectively.

The Department for Business and Trade said its intention is to support enforcement bodies while preserving the UK’s reputation for product safety.

New UK fire safety law targets online marketplaces selling unsafe products: Summary

The Product Regulation and Metrology Act has received Royal Assent.

The law introduces enforcement powers aimed at online marketplaces.

The purpose is to reduce the sale of unsafe goods, including lithium-ion batteries.

According to the Office for Product Safety and Standards, there were 211 e-bike and e-scooter fire incidents in 2024.

Most incidents were reported by London Fire Brigade.

The Government said the act creates parity between online and physical retailers.

Online marketplaces will be required to meet product safety obligations.

The Office for Product Safety and Standards will continue targeted campaigns.

Statements supporting the law came from Government, fire services, and safety groups.

The law affects about 300,000 UK businesses in the regulated product sector.

Thousands of unsafe gas jobs go unchecked as unqualified installers sidestep scrutiny

by Featured NewsSafety

Widespread risk from unregistered gas installations

ATAG has reported that more than 80% of certified UK gas engineers are regularly called out to correct dangerous installations carried out by unregistered individuals.

The findings, based on a national survey conducted by ATAG Heating Technology, indicate a consistent issue, with nearly half of respondents saying the faulty work they encounter creates a serious risk of carbon monoxide poisoning.

The company said one in five engineers reported direct business losses due to these illegal jobs, including reputational damage and lost contracts.

According to the company, the problem stems from limited control over boiler sales and widespread use of social media by unregistered installers to promote their services.

ATAG stated that 61% of surveyed installers believe boiler sales should be restricted to Gas Safe registered engineers to reduce the number of unsafe installations.

Industry calls for tighter product sales restrictions

ATAG has called for legal limits on who can buy and install gas-critical equipment, urging policymakers to take action.

The company said it enforces a strict policy of selling only to certified professionals and is now encouraging others in the sector to adopt the same approach.

Kevin Treanor, Director of ATAG Heating Technology UK, said: “Illegal gas work poses a serious threat to our profession, but more than that, it endangers the lives of UK residents.”

Treanor added: “Every year, around 250,000 gas jobs are carried out by unqualified individuals, and we need to work to bring that number to zero.”

He continued: “According to the Gas Safe Register, two-thirds of work is unsafe, and our engineers routinely uncover dangerously installed systems that could lead to carbon monoxide poisoning, fires, or even explosions.

“Government data also shows that dozens of people lose their lives annually to carbon monoxide poisoning caused by faulty appliances.”

Survey findings highlight scale of problem

The survey found that 45% of illegal gas work is advertised on social media platforms, allowing unqualified individuals to access a broad audience without regulatory oversight.

ATAG said a third of engineers estimated that homeowners spend over £400 to fix these faulty installations, increasing financial risk alongside safety concerns.

Treanor said: “The fact that over half of installers are never asked to show ID when attending a job shows just how vulnerable the current system is. We urgently need tougher safeguards to protect the public and uphold professional standards.”

ATAG has launched a campaign to encourage tradespeople and the public to support legislative change, including a template letter to MPs available on its website.

Gas Safe Register and government data underline safety concerns

Treanor cited data from the Gas Safe Register showing that two-thirds of inspected jobs carried out by non-registered workers are deemed unsafe.

He also referenced UK government figures which show dozens of annual deaths from carbon monoxide poisoning, often linked to faulty gas appliances.

ATAG said that the profession cannot rely solely on customer vigilance and is asking for stronger structural protections to be implemented across the sector.

It stated that sales restrictions, improved verification checks, and public awareness campaigns are necessary to reduce harm.

Industry-wide appeal for legislative support

ATAG is asking the wider industry to join its push for reform by contacting MPs directly.

It is also encouraging members of the public to do the same through its website.

The company stated that legal restrictions on product sales would reduce the number of installations by unregistered individuals and help restore confidence in the profession.

ATAG continues to maintain its policy of working only with Gas Safe registered engineers and said that broader enforcement would benefit both safety and the trade.

Illegal gas work prompts new gas safety legislation call: Summary

ATAG Heating Technology has conducted a national survey of certified gas installers in the UK.

More than 82% of respondents said they fix illegal installations at least once per quarter.

Almost 50% said the work poses serious safety risks, including carbon monoxide poisoning.

One in five said illegal work causes them business harm.

The survey found that 45% of illegal work is advertised on social media.

ATAG reported that a third of engineers said customers pay over £400 to fix faulty jobs.

61% of respondents want boiler sales limited to Gas Safe engineers.

Kevin Treanor of ATAG said 250,000 gas jobs are done by unqualified individuals each year.

He cited Gas Safe Register data showing two-thirds of such work is unsafe.

UK government data shows dozens die each year from carbon monoxide linked to faulty appliances.

ATAG is calling on MPs to pass laws restricting boiler sales to registered professionals.

Installers and the public can write to MPs via the ATAG website.

Senate passes aerial firefighting support act to expand suppression fleet

by Aerial FirefightingFeatured NewsFire Suppression

Senate advances wildfire suppression act with bipartisan backing

The Office of Senator Mark Kelly has reported that the United States Senate has passed the Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act of 2025.

The bill is designed to improve wildfire suppression capabilities by increasing access to aircraft and parts for aerial firefighting.

The measure was introduced with support from Senators Mark Kelly, Martin Heinrich, Tim Sheehy and Alex Padilla.

It will now move to the House of Representatives for consideration.

The legislation amends existing laws to enable the Department of Defense to sell surplus aircraft and components at fair market value, specifically for use in wildfire response operations.

New law to expand U.S. aerial firefighting capabilities

According to the Office of Senator Mark Kelly, the bill reauthorises provisions of the Wildfire Suppression Aircraft Transfer Act of 1996.

It allows the Secretary of Defense to sell excess aircraft and related parts to government-contracted aerial firefighting service providers.

The parts and aircraft must be used exclusively for wildfire suppression.

The original authority lapsed in 2005 and was later reauthorised between 2012 and 2017 before expiring again.

If passed by the House, the new law would provide a renewed legal framework to support the year-round use of military surplus resources in civilian wildfire suppression.

The bill does not provide free transfers but mandates that the sales be conducted at fair market value.

Political support reflects rising wildfire risk

Senator Mark Kelly said: “In Arizona and across the West, wildfires are more frequent, more intense, and no longer confined to a single season.

“Strengthening our aerial firefighting fleet by making more aircraft and parts available is a smart, proven way to help firefighters respond faster and keep communities safe.

“I’m proud to support this effort to ensure the tools are in place to meet the growing threat, and I’ll keep working to get it done.”

Senator Martin Heinrich said: “I’m pleased that my Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act is one step close to becoming law.

“The Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act is urgently needed to expand the operations of Very Large Air Tankers that have proven absolutely essential to firefighters battling large wildfires in New Mexico and across the West.

“I will never stop fighting to deliver the resources that our communities need to effectively respond to wildfires.”

Lawmakers cite urgency of wildfire response improvements

Senator Tim Sheehy said: “It’s only April, and this year has already seen the most dangerous and expensive wildfire season in history.

“It’s clear our government must do more to give wildland firefighters the tools they need to protect communities and save lives.

“The Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act supports that mission by eliminating bureaucratic obstacles to provide our aerial wildfire suppression fleet the resources necessary to fight wildfires quickly and aggressively.

“I’m grateful to my colleagues for their support of this bipartisan legislation, and I will continue to use the full power of my office to support the brave first responders on the front lines fighting wildfires across the country.”

California experiences drive support for aircraft access

Senator Alex Padilla said: “As catastrophic wildfires devastate communities across the country, we need to be smarter and more resourceful in our approach to wildfire suppression.

“Californians saw firsthand the power of our aerial wildfire suppression fleet in putting out the Los Angeles fires as quickly as possible.

“Shoring up aerial firefighting fleets by allowing the Department of Defense to sell excess aircraft parts is a lifesaving, commonsense priority — and I’m glad to see the Senate come together to unanimously pass this bipartisan legislation.”

Senate passes aerial firefighting support act to expand suppression fleet: Summary

The Office of Senator Mark Kelly reported that the Senate passed the Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act of 2025.

The Act allows the sale of Department of Defense surplus aircraft and parts for use in aerial wildfire suppression.

The bill reauthorises a previous authority that expired in 2017.

The aircraft and parts must be sold at fair market value.

Sales are limited to contractors working with the federal government on aerial firefighting.

The Act aims to improve year-round response capabilities to wildfires in the U.S.

Senators Mark Kelly, Martin Heinrich, Tim Sheehy and Alex Padilla supported the legislation.

Senator Kelly said the measure reflects the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires.

Senator Heinrich said the Act is essential for operating Very Large Air Tankers.

Senator Sheehy said the current wildfire season is already among the worst in history.

Senator Padilla said the bill will support faster suppression responses across California.

The bill will proceed to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act advances in US Congress

by Featured NewsSafetyWildland Fire

House passes Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act of 2025

The United States House of Representatives passed the Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act of 2025 on May 13 by unanimous consent.

The legislation, also known as H.R. 2492, would allow the US Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management to approve the removal of hazard trees and vegetation around electrical transmission corridors on public lands without requiring a corresponding timber sale.

This proposed change aims to streamline vegetation management near electric infrastructure to reduce the risk of wildfires.

Senate to consider related legislation

The House bill now advances to the Senate, where a separate but related version, S. 349, was introduced in January.

While H.R. 2492 covers both the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, the Senate version focuses solely on Forest Service lands.

The Senate Committee on Agriculture has not yet reviewed the bill.

Industry support from the American Public Power Association

The American Public Power Association (APPA) has expressed support for the Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act.

The group said the measure aligns with its Resolution 25-09, titled In Support of Increased Federal Efforts to Address the Growing Threats of Wildfires, which was adopted at the 2025 Legislative Rally in Washington, DC.

The resolution calls on federal land management agencies to speed up the approval process for hazard tree removal and routine vegetation management to mitigate wildfire risks.

Key provisions of the legislation

According to the bill, the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior may grant permission under existing special use permits or easements for the cutting and removal of trees and other vegetation around power lines on National Forest System and Bureau of Land Management lands.

This is conditional on the activity being consistent with existing land and resource management plans and environmental regulations.

The legislation also specifies that if an electrical utility sells any removed material, proceeds must be remitted to the respective Secretary after accounting for transport costs.

However, there is no requirement for any removed material to be sold.

Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act: Summary

The US House has passed the Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act of 2025 by unanimous consent.

The act enables the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to allow tree removal around electrical lines without a timber sale.

It applies to both National Forest System lands and BLM-managed lands.

The Senate will now consider a related version of the bill, which focuses only on Forest Service lands.

The American Public Power Association supports the bill as consistent with its wildfire risk reduction policy.

The bill outlines requirements for compliance with environmental law and management plans.

Utilities may sell removed materials but must return proceeds, minus transport costs, to the federal agency.

There is no requirement for materials to be sold.

The legislation is designed to accelerate vegetation management to improve fire safety near electric infrastructure.

Lithium-ion battery fire risks addressed through U.S. House legislation

by Featured NewsSafety

U.S. House approves new consumer safety standards for lithium-ion batteries

The International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) has reported that the U.S. House of Representatives has passed H.R. 973, the Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-ion Batteries Act, by a vote of 365 to 42.

The bill directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue mandatory federal safety standards for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in micromobility devices, including e-bikes and scooters.

The legislation aims to address an increase in fires caused by these batteries, which have been linked to safety hazards across the United States.

Fire service leaders support lithium-ion battery regulation

IAFC President and Board Chair Fire Chief Josh Waldo welcomed the passage of H.R. 973 by the House of Representatives.

Waldo said: “I am thankful that the U.S. House of Representatives has voted overwhelmingly to pass the Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act (H.R. 973).

“I thank Representative Ritchie Torres, House Speaker Mike Johnson, Chairman Brett Guthrie, and Ranking Member Pallone for their leadership in passing this critical legislation to set fire safety standards for lithium-ion batteries and their charging elements in e-mobility devices.

“We look forward to working with our allies to pass this legislation in the Senate.”

According to the IAFC, the next step for the legislation will be consideration in the Senate, where a companion bill, S. 389, has already cleared the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

Scope and implementation of the battery safety legislation

The legislation requires the Consumer Product Safety Commission to finalise federal standards within 180 days of enactment.

It specifies the adoption of the ANSI/CAN/UL 2271 standard for batteries used in light electric vehicles, ANSI/CAN/UL 2849 for e-bike systems, and ANSI/CA/UL 2272 for personal e-mobility devices.

The Commission is instructed to apply these standards only to consumer products as defined under existing consumer product safety law.

Future revisions to these standards must be reported to the Commission, and if no objection is raised within 90 days, the updates will take effect after 180 days.

Reporting requirements and long-term oversight

The bill also requires the Commission to submit a report to Congress within five years of enactment.

This report must include data on fires, explosions and other hazards linked to lithium-ion batteries in micromobility devices.

The report must specify the source of the information, details of the battery and product models involved, and whether the batteries complied with the mandated standards, if known.

It must also include information on the manufacturer and country of origin of the batteries when available.

Lithium-ion battery fire risks addressed through U.S. House legislation: Summary

The International Association of Fire Chiefs reported that the U.S. House passed H.R. 973 with bipartisan support.

The bill is titled the Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-ion Batteries Act.

It mandates federal safety standards for lithium-ion batteries in micromobility devices.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission must implement these standards within 180 days.

Standards include ANSI/CAN/UL 2271, UL 2849 and UL 2272.

Future revisions to these standards will be treated as official safety rules unless objected to.

A companion Senate bill, S. 389, has passed committee and awaits full Senate consideration.

Fire Chief Josh Waldo, IAFC President and Board Chair, expressed support for the legislation.

The Act includes a requirement for the Commission to report on battery-related hazards within five years.

Reports must include sources, product and battery details, compliance status, and manufacturing information.

Geology and fire safety laws approved in Vietnam

by Featured NewsSafety

Vietnam enacts new geology and fire safety legislation

Vietnam’s National Assembly has approved the Geology and Mineral Law with 446 out of 448 deputies voting in favour, representing 93.11 per cent of members.

As reported by Vietnam News, the legislation comprises 12 chapters and 111 articles, addressing geological investigations, mineral resource protection, mining operations, resource recovery, and mineral extraction rights auctions.

State management responsibilities are outlined for Vietnam’s mainland, islands, internal waters, territorial seas, exclusive economic zones, and continental shelves.

The law excludes petroleum resources, natural water aside from mineral or hot spring water, and unrelated mineral processing activities.

Amendments were proposed during discussions, including updates to mineral planning categories.

Article 12 introduces classifications as ‘Group I’ and ‘Group II Mineral Planning’ for legal clarity.

Mining permits under Article 56 now have a maximum validity of 30 years, extendable by 20 years.

Permits for projects with viable reserves may be reissued to ensure efficient resource use.

Fire prevention law targets urban safety

The National Assembly also passed the Fire Prevention, Fighting and Rescue Law with 448 out of 450 deputies voting in favour, representing 93.53 per cent of members.

The legislation comprises eight chapters and 55 articles, defining state agency, organisational, household, and individual responsibilities.

Administrative procedures for fire safety have been streamlined, reducing processes from 37 to 10, lowering compliance costs.

Urban housing requirements mandate fire safety equipment such as alarms and extinguishers in densely populated areas with inadequate infrastructure.

Initial enforcement will focus on Hà Nội, HCM City, Đà Nẵng, Cần Thơ, and Hải Phòng.

Other regions are encouraged to adopt these measures voluntarily.

Stricter regulations for repurposed buildings

The fire safety law includes provisions for residential buildings repurposed for businesses such as karaoke bars, nightclubs, and dance halls.

As outlined in Article 23, these conversions must adhere to construction and fire safety standards.

Article 14 prohibits unauthorised modifications that compromise fire safety.

The legislation also requires Vietnamese citizens aged 18 and above, in good health, to participate in local firefighting and rescue teams when needed.

Enhanced safety measures introduced in Vietnam

Vietnam’s new legislation aims to improve geological resource management and fire safety standards.

The Geology and Mineral Law sets updated guidelines for mining permits, resource recovery, and state responsibilities.

Meanwhile, the Fire Prevention, Fighting and Rescue Law introduces urban fire safety requirements, stricter rules for repurposed buildings, and reduced administrative processes, focusing on densely populated cities while encouraging broader adoption across the country.

US Senators reintroduce legislation to enhance fire safety in public housing

by AmericasBuilding ManagementFeatured NewsHealth and SafetySafety

Legislation to retrofit public housing buildings with sprinkler systems

U.S. Senators Tina Smith and Amy Klobuchar have reintroduced legislation to help install sprinkler systems in older public housing buildings, aiming to increase safety and save lives.

A detailed outline of the proposed legislation can be found here.

Companion legislation has been introduced in the House by US Representatives Bonnie Watson Coleman and John Rutherford, with support from Representative Ilhan Omar.

The Public Housing Fire Safety Act is a response to the tragic Cedar High Apartments fire in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in 2019.

The upper floors of the building where the fire erupted did not have sprinkler systems installed.

Key quotes from the officials on public housing fire safety

Senator Klobuchar stated: “In the wake of the tragic 2019 Cedar High Apartments Fire, I joined Senator Smith in introducing legislation to ensure that buildings have properly installed fire and sprinkler systems.

“Every second counts during a house fire, and with up-to-date systems, more lives can be saved.

“We need to continue these efforts by passing the Public Housing Fire Safety Act to bring us one step closer towards ensuring that buildings are safe for all residents.”

Senator Smith remarked: “The fire at Cedar High Apartments was a tragic loss for the Cedar-Riverside community.

“In the aftermath of the tragedy, I began connecting with people closely affected by the fire and looking into ways to prevent it from happening again.

“This bill gets to the root of what we need to do: incentivise public housing authorities to install sprinkler systems and give them the support they need to do it.”

Bill Webb, Executive Director of the Congressional Fire Services Institute, noted the importance of investment in retrofitting with fire sprinkler systems for public housing safety.

Trinidad Uribe, President of the USA Sprinkler Fitters Association, called the Public Housing Fire Safety Act a “crucial and necessary solution to improving the safety of public housing facilities and protecting the lives of tenants across the country.”

Details of the Public Housing Fire Safety Act and historical context

The Federal Fire Safety Act of 1992 mandated the installation of sprinklers in all newly constructed government-owned high-rise buildings.

However, thousands of public housing apartment buildings around the country were built before that date, leaving them without mandatory sprinkler systems.

Nearly all of the high-rise public housing buildings in Minneapolis were constructed prior to these regulations.

The Public Housing Fire Safety Act would create an annual $25 million competitive grant programme to provide funds to public housing authorities wishing to retrofit older high-rise apartment buildings with sprinkler systems.

Senators Smith and Klobuchar have previously secured $2 million in funding for the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority to install fire sprinklers in outdated public housing, reflecting a long-standing commitment to safety in public housing.

IFSJ Comment

The reintroduction of legislation aimed at improving fire safety measures in public housing reflects a timely response to the ongoing challenge of keeping residents safe.

By focusing on retrofitting older buildings with sprinkler systems, the Public Housing Fire Safety Act has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of tragic incidents like the Cedar High Apartments fire in 2019.

We will continue to monitor the development of this legislation and its potential impact on public housing across the country.

First Responders Fair RETIRE Act passed unanimously by the Senate

by

The US Senate has passed the First Responder Fair RETIRE Act, a piece of bipartisan legislation that ensure federal firefighters, law enforcement officers, and other federal first responders qualify for full retirement benefits if they are injured on the job and return to the federal workforce.

The House passed the legislation unanimously in July, 2022. The legislation was introduced in the House by Congressman Gerry Connolly (D-VA), the Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Government Operations, Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), and Congressman Jim Langevin (D-RI). Companion legislation in the Senate was introduced by Senator Jon Tester (D-MT).

The bill now heads to President Biden’s desk for signature.

Due to the the hazardous nature the job required of Federal first responders, Congress created an accelerated retirement system for these positions and established a mandatory retirement age of 57.

Referred to as “6c” for the section of the law in which this retirement system was established, federal first responders are entitled to an annuity after serving for 20 years and reaching age 50. They pay a greater percentage of their salary into their retirement system, and their annuity amount is calculated at a higher rate than other federal employees who make their payments over the course of 30 years.

The Act addresses inequities facing federal first responders who may become injured on the job and are then unable to continue their service before full retirement. It allows federal first responders to stay in the 6c retirement system if they are placed in another civil service position outside of the 6c system after returning to work from a duty related injury. The bill also allows these employees to receive a refund of their accelerated contributions should they be separated from service before they are entitled to an annuity.

Congressman Gerry Connolly commented: “Our federal firefighters, Capitol Police officers, Secret Service agents, Customs and Border Protections Officers, and other federal law enforcement officials put their lives on the line every day for our fellow Americans.

“We have a responsibility to uphold our promise to those that are injured on the job and ensure their first responders’ benefits are fully protected. They shouldn’t be penalized, especially when they are still committed to public service.”

“I thank Senator Tester for his unwavering support in getting the  First Responder Fair Retire Act across the finish line.

“Our bipartisan legislation will ensure federal firefighters, law enforcement officials, Border Patrol officers, and other federal first responders qualify for full retirement benefits if they are injured on the job.”

The First Responder Fair RETIRE Act is supported by the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, the National Fraternal Order of Police, the National Federation of Federal Employees, the International Association of Firefighters, the National Association of Police Organizations, the National Treasury Employees Union, and the Senior Executives Association.

Edward A. Kelly, General President of the International Association of Fire Fighters, commented: “Fire fighters deserve a dignified retirement. It is why the International Association of Fire Fighters has supported the First Responders Fair RETIRE Act. Our job is dangerous, and the risk of injury is high. Providing federal fire fighters with access to their full retirement benefits if they’re injured on duty is right and fair. The IAFF is grateful to Senator Jon Tester and Representative Gerald Connolly for advocating on behalf of our nation’s fire fighters, who work tirelessly to keep all of us safe.”

National Federation of Federal Employees National President Randy Erwin said: “For decades, when a federal firefighter, law enforcement officer, other any first responder got injured on the job, they could have their hard-earned pension unfairly stolen from them.

“Thanks to this legislation, their pension is now safe. I thank Chairman Connolly for his unrelenting leadership over many congresses to get this done. In the end, this bill passed the House 417-0 and then passed ‘under unanimous’ consent in the Senate. On behalf of our nation’s federal first responders, we thank Chairman Connolly for his support to protect those injured in the line of duty.”