These equipment failures are putting cargo ships at risk, says Survitec

Survitec reveals the most common equipment and servicing failures found on commercial cargo ships—and why addressing them is more urgent than ever

Fires are a common occurrence in commercial shipping, and they occur almost weekly in the container shipping segment.

The latest figures from insurer Allianz highlight the extent of the problem, as while the number of ships lost across the industry is now at a record low, there has still been 55 total losses caused by fires in the past five years. Over 200 fire incidents were reported in 2023 alone.

Industry analysts have pointed to the use of new alternative fuels, the carriage of lithium-ion battery cargoes, and a reported increase in mis-declared dangerous cargoes, especially hazardous containerised cargoes, as being contributing factors.

Metkel Yohannes, Director of Service and Rental Solutions at Survitec, believes that inadequate fire safety inspections are a less obvious but just as important underlying cause.

“The economic downturn and the emphasis on cost reduction post-Covid have had a negative impact on fire safety,” says Yohannes. “We know from experience that some ship owners and operators are maintaining and inspecting safety equipment themselves as a way of making their budgets stretch further. Crew training is also being negatively impacted. We’re finding basic errors and oversights that do not become apparent until either the ship fails an inspection and is detained – or there is a fire.”

Small oversights, big problems: Lessons from inspections

As an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and fire safety expert, Survitec is often called upon to investigate problems or faults with fire safety equipment. Their specialist fire safety technicians routinely find deficiencies in the routine maintenance and testing of safety-critical equipment that then impact system performance, even leading to equipment failure in some cases.

For instance, Survitec was called out to a vessel after an engine room fire. The crew had managed to extinguish the fire but suspected there was a fault with their high expansion foam firefighting system. The cause of the fault was a blockage in the system. The crew had installed a new foam pump and forgotten to remove one of the protective caps.

Survitec often finds issues that indicate insufficient training or a lack of expertise. For example, the foam proportioner on a high expansion foam system should be removed and inspected regularly, yet Survitec will often find membranes are damaged or broken, which impacts the delivery of foam to the system.

Another common mistake is to mix different types or brands of firefighting foam. When this happens, the foam becomes contaminated. In one inspection of the foam tank for a helideck system, Survitec found the foam had changed from a liquid state to an almost sponge-like, gelatinous state.

The system was therefore inoperable and required major work – and considerable expense – to remove the contaminated foam, deep-clean the system, and recharge it. Fortunately, in this instance, the fault was discovered and rectified before the ship had cause to use the system, because the system would certainly have failed had there been a fire.

The backbone of safety: Routine equipment inspections

Rigorous fire safety inspections of fixed firefighting systems play a vital role in ensuring the safety of a vessel and its crew. Survitec reports that many, if not most, of the inspections they perform reveal issues that require immediate corrective measures.

Furthermore, issues related to poor maintenance or superficial inspections will generally be found across multiple systems, not just one system. For example, valves that have corroded and do not open or close properly can be a common issue across all systems.

This erosion of standards correlates directly with a troubling rise in fire safety-related deficiencies recorded on board ships in recent years. The resulting increase in ship detentions following port state control inspections underscores the real-world consequences of these lapses in safety practices.

Yohannes says: “We clearly see evidence of a slip in standards when it comes to basic safety practices. Approval stamps are being applied to fire systems and appliances that would or should not pass inspection.

“There should be more oversight, more governance, and better quality control procedures. Shipowners and managers need accredited service partners they can trust.”

Technical Sales Manager at Survitec, Jan-Oskar Lid, confirms that while paperwork might indicate that a service inspection has been carried out, the levels of wear and tear on the equipment can sometimes suggest otherwise. “Some issues are self-evident – for example, the rust on a valve or a fire extinguisher is clear to see, but other issues are less obvious and can have catastrophic consequences.”

Lid quotes an example. In early 2024 a bulk carrier left port, having just completed a fire safety inspection and received full certification from a local service provider. Shortly after leaving port, a fire started in the engine room.

The crew released the CO2 system, which had just been inspected and approved, yet more than half the cylinders failed to activate. The fire was eventually extinguished but there was significant damage to the vessel, with costs of US$2-3 million for off-hire and repairs.

Lid also points out that this is not just an issue for older vessels. Inspections are just as essential for new vessels, to verify that new equipment is fully operational. For example, a CO2 system will be disabled, for safety, while a ship remains in the shipyard.

It is not uncommon for Survitec service technicians to discover that a new ship has been sailing without a functioning CO2 firefighting system, because the pilot hoses for the main control valves and release cabinets have not yet been reconnected, and safety pins are still in place.

Procuring the right parts

The procurement of spare and replacement parts can also be a challenge for ship owners and operators. Without the relevant training or expertise, it can be difficult for purchasing personnel to recognise low-quality or counterfeit parts, or even the “right” part.

High pressure hoses for CO2 fire extinguishing systems are a key example. Hoses approved for use on a high-pressure CO2 system can be distinguished by the pin pricks that run along the length of the hose, and by the Type Approval Test certificate details which will be stamped into the crimping neck, as mandated by the class societies. Poor-quality or counterfeit parts will not have these features, but the purchaser needs to know what to look for.

Revised guidelines for the maintenance and inspection of CO2 systems were published in 2021 (MSC 1318 Rev.1), to help protect seafarers against the dangers of leaking gas. Yet, safety inspections often uncover serious issues.

Hydraulic hoses are often mistaken for high-pressure hoses and improperly used in CO2 systems, risking failure under pressure. Deviations from datasheet specifications, ill-fitting hoses forced with copper washers, over-crimping, blocked or peeling hoses, and the use of multiple connections—all contrary to best practices—highlight lapses in inspection and maintenance routines.

Evaluating service provider credentials

Survey reports from Survitec’s global network of service engineers indicate declining crew competencies and skills in this respect, possibly due in part to the seafarer shortage but also the challenge of keeping on top of the various rules and regulations.

As Yohannes explains: “Service requirements are complex and varied. The International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) MSC 1432. MSC 1432 is effectively a baseline for servicing. The vessel class and flag may specify additional or stricter requirements, and the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) may have their own requirements too.

“Requirements will also vary depending on the service interval. Specialist fire safety service providers therefore invest heavily in training to provide for this.”

However, it is not always easy to identify the reputable providers. There can be a wide disparity in service quality between service providers. As Lid explains: “Cost can be the determining factor when selecting a service provider, especially when different providers boast the same approvals. Some providers may compete by undercutting their competitors, but they can often only do this by cutting corners.

“They may not invest in training to the same degree, so their technicians may lack knowledge of the different rules and regulations or the requirements for all the different brands.

“They may not even have all the equipment required to complete the inspection beyond a cursory visual check. In extreme cases, certificates may even be issued without an engineer setting foot onboard the vessel.”

Finding a provider you can trust

In its 2024 white paper Why are the fires not going out? Survitec highlights the importance of proactive measures and robust maintenance practices to ensure fire safety systems operate effectively in critical situations, also offering practical advice on what shipping companies should look for in their fire safety providers, and how to assess competency.

As Yohannes maintains, specialist fire safety service providers can play a crucial role in supporting proper and effective maintenance and testing on board ship, however trust is key. “Currently, there are no quality benchmarks, and no training standards in place to help determine competencies,” says Yohannes.

“As an industry, we should review current practices and decide: do we need more oversight, more governance, better quality control procedures around servicing and approvals?

“Ship owners and operators need accredited service partners they can trust. Anything less is not just a false economy, it’s potentially dangerous.”

Why Are the Fires Not Going Out?

Survitec’s recent white paper, Why Are the Fires Not Going Out? explores these key considerations in greater detail, offering practical advice on evaluating providers’ expertise, compliance with safety standards, and ability to deliver effective, long-term solutions. Download your free copy at survitecgroup.com

This article was originally published in the February 2025 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal – to read your FREE digital copy, click here.

White paper wins award for addressing maritime fire safety deficiencies

Survitec report highlights gaps in maritime fire safety

A white paper by Survitec has won the Safety in Maritime (Marine) award at the International Bulk Journal (IBJ) Awards.

The document, titled Why Are the Fires Not Going Out? Unveiling the True Cost of Inadequate Fire Safety Inspections, focuses on critical lapses in fire safety practices across the maritime sector.

According to the paper, systemic risks and post-pandemic cost-cutting measures have contributed to a rise in shipboard fire incidents globally.

Survitec’s research draws on data and testimonies from its network of service technicians.

The findings reveal that untrained crews often perform fire safety maintenance, leading to system failures such as incorrect installations, counterfeit parts, and poorly fitted equipment.

Fire safety lapses and real-world consequences

The white paper highlights examples of fire safety failures and their consequences.

In one case, a vessel’s high-expansion foam system failed during an engine room fire due to a blockage caused by a protective cap left in the system during installation.

Another incident in early 2024 involved a bulk carrier fire, which resulted in $2-3 million USD in damages.

Over half of the CO2 cylinders recently inspected and certified failed to activate during the emergency.

Survitec’s study also warns of emerging risks linked to alternative fuels and lithium-ion batteries, emphasising the need for specialised detection and firefighting systems.

Call for industry-wide improvements

Metkel Yohannes, Director of Service & Rental Solutions at Survitec, stressed the importance of improved fire safety standards:

“Shipboard fires have risen by 17% year-on-year, becoming one of the leading causes of maritime losses and the most expensive source of marine insurance claims, accounting for over 20% of total losses.”

Yohannes added: “While advancements in fire detection and protection technologies have been made, the industry is still seeing alarming levels of fire safety deficiencies, with thousands of incidents reported each year by international inspection authorities.”

Survitec urges the maritime industry to implement stricter oversight and quality control measures for safety inspections.

Award underscores importance of fire safety in maritime

The IBJ Awards’ recognition of Survitec’s white paper highlights ongoing concerns about fire safety in the maritime industry.

The paper advocates for the adoption of international standards and calls for accredited safety partners to ensure compliance with rigorous benchmarks.

Yohannes noted:

“Shipowners and operators need accredited partners with the expertise to ensure their safety systems perform under the most demanding conditions.

“Anything less is not only a false economy but a threat to crew safety and vessel integrity.”

The award-winning paper aims to drive meaningful change within the maritime sector.

Survitec white paper recognised at IBJ Awards for safety insights: Summary

A Survitec white paper titled Why Are the Fires Not Going Out? Unveiling the True Cost of Inadequate Fire Safety Inspections won the Safety in Maritime (Marine) award at the IBJ Awards.

It highlights systemic risks in fire safety practices, with examples of maintenance failures and untrained crews leading to shipboard incidents.

One case involved a vessel where fire system blockages went undetected due to poor maintenance, while another saw a bulk carrier suffer millions in damages after CO2 systems failed.

The study also addresses emerging risks from alternative fuels and lithium-ion batteries, calling for stricter standards and accredited service providers.

Metkel Yohannes of Survitec emphasised the need for improved oversight, noting that shipboard fires are a leading cause of maritime losses.

The award reinforces the importance of addressing these issues across the industry.

Survitec receives awards for Seahaven inflatable lifeboat in innovation and safety

Survitec’s Seahaven wins recognition in innovation and safety

Global Survival Technology provider, Survitec, has been awarded two Ship Technology Excellence Awards for its Seahaven inflatable lifeboat, as reported by Survitec.

Recognised in both the Innovation and Safety categories, Seahaven stands as a modern alternative to traditional lifeboats and has been celebrated for its design and functionality at the annual awards, powered by GlobalData’s business intelligence platform.

These awards highlight individuals and companies driving forward developments within the maritime industry.

Originally launched by Survitec in 2022, Seahaven is designed for large cruise ships and can evacuate up to 1,060 passengers in under 22 minutes, which is well within the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) regulation of 30 minutes.

Seahaven’s design combines expertise from Survitec’s aerospace, defence, and maritime divisions, reflecting a collaborative approach to enhancing maritime safety.

New approach to lifeboat design

Seahaven represents a departure from traditional lifeboat models, which have remained largely unchanged since the Titanic era.

Commenting on this shift, Survitec’s Chief Operating Officer, Claude Sada, stated: “Cruise ships are reaching unprecedented sizes, accommodating up to 10,000 passengers and crew, but traditional lifeboats take up a lot of prime ship-side real-estate that could be better used to enhance the passenger experience.” Seahaven’s compact structure is Panamax compliant, allowing deployment in areas with varying tidal levels, like Alaska.

The Seahaven system also benefits the onboard environment by reducing space demands on the ship, particularly on Decks 6 and 7.

This opens up additional deck space, providing passengers with improved sea views and increased natural light, enhancing their onboard experience.

Operational efficiency and safety improvements

The Seahaven system is designed to enhance safety and efficiency in emergency evacuation scenarios.

With the ability to be deployed at the push of a button and automatic inflation, Seahaven minimises the need for crew intervention.

This ease of use reduces crew workloads and maintenance requirements, with Survitec reporting a 93% reduction in life-saving appliance (LSA) upkeep time, down from 150 hours to just 10 hours.

Additionally, Seahaven’s helical slide technology enables a safe and quick descent for passengers.

The technology’s performance in heavy weather conditions has been demonstrated, and its reduced crew involvement lowers the risk of human error in evacuation processes.

Collaborative development and engineering excellence

Survitec developed Seahaven over a five-year period, drawing on expertise from a team of 30 marine engineers.

This project applied advanced methodologies typically used in aerospace, resulting in a product that delivers high levels of reliability and operational cost-efficiency.

With extended service durations and lower maintenance demands, Seahaven aligns with high safety standards and long-term cost benefits for operators.

Chief Operating Officer Sada acknowledged the contributions of the entire Survitec team, stating: “Everyone involved in the Seahaven project must take enormous pride in celebrating these award wins.

“Colleagues across our organisation, from designers, technicians, finance, and marketing to countless others, have played an integral part in this success.”

Survitec wins Ship Technology Excellence Awards for Seahaven inflatable lifeboat: Summary

Survitec, a global provider of survival technology, has received two Ship Technology Excellence Awards for its Seahaven inflatable lifeboat in the categories of Innovation and Safety.

Seahaven, launched in 2022 and designed for large cruise ships, allows for the evacuation of up to 1,060 passengers in under 22 minutes, meeting SOLAS requirements.

The system’s compact design frees up deck space, enhancing onboard experience, and its automated features reduce crew demands.

Developed by Survitec’s team of engineers, Seahaven’s design incorporates aerospace engineering principles, offering improved safety and operational efficiencies.

Survitec Suitxchange removes compliance burdens and reduces port delays

Global Survival Technology solutions provider Survitec has introduced a new rental and exchange service to ensure ship operators always have fully serviced and certified immersion suits onboard.

SuitXChange offers two immersion suits from its world-leading brands, Hansen Protection and Crewsaver. It is a fast exchange service designed to remove the administrative, financial, and operational challenges ship managers face awaiting the return of serviced suits during scheduled port visits.

The development, which provides a more timely and sustainable solution for immersion suit servicing, follows the success of Survitec’s RaftXChange service. When Survitec introduced the world’s first global Liferaft exchange programme in 2008, the industry quickly saw the benefits of quick port turnaround, controlled compliance, and lower capital costs.

Metkel Yohannes, Survitec’s Director of Service and Rental Solutions, said: “By opting for a rental and exchange agreement, no capital investment is required. The prices are fixed, meaning our customers will never be hit with unforeseen costs, allowing them to plan and budget more accurately”.

Under Survitec’s new SuitXChange programme, immersion suits due for certification can be replaced with newly serviced, fully certified suits of the same type, which are ready for exchange as soon as the vessel enters port, supporting customer calls for shorter port stays. The logistics required to service suits are reduced, so less transportation is needed, resulting in a more environmentally sustainable operation. The service facilitates overall cost reduction and better management through fixed annual charges. At the same time, Survitec’s team of highly skilled technicians ensure immersion suits are always compliant with the regulations.

Survitec implemented an eight-month SuitXChange pilot programme to gain insight from its customers. The research helped the company tailor the service to ship managers’ requirements before launching to the market.

“Ship managers often tell us they struggle to get their suits serviced in time, having to rent or buy additional suits to prevent port delays. And then had to pay for those suits being serviced to be shipped to their next location for pickup. With SuitXChange, ship managers no longer need to worry about ensuring they have compliant suits and in-date certificates. We take care of it all”, said Survitec’s Product Category Manager, Alex Scollins.

Ship managers who have already signed a Survitec rental agreement say SuitXChange negates any immersion suit capital expenditure and can reduce the time their vessel spends in port. SuitXChange also eliminates the administrative burden of due-date management, tracking, managing, and ensuring that all associated tasks are completed. Under the agreement, Survitec will fulfil all related tasks.

Since different immersion suits have different service intervals, Survitec offers its Crewsaver Endurance immersion suit for a six-year rental period, with exchanges taking place every three years.

The enhanced SuitXChange+ program offers the premium Hansen Protection SeaEco+ immersion suit, certified for use without a lifejacket.

Both offer fully tested, certified, and SOLAS-compliant immersion suits for a fixed annual rental fee. It is a mandatory requirement under SOLAS regulation III/32 (as amended by resolution MSC.152(78) that all persons on board merchant ships have an immersion suit regularly serviced and certified to prolong the in-water life of each crew member following ship abandonment ship.

“We offer a straightforward administration approach with a key account manager backed up by an experienced global customer service team. We facilitate all the preparation and logistics of the immersion suit exchange, delivering peace of mind.

“We have the largest, most comprehensive service network worldwide, so we can guarantee that immersion suits are replaced with newly serviced, fully certified suits of the same type at all the major maritime hubs,” said Yohannes.

Survitec wins JMSDF contract for submarine escape suit servicing

Survitec partners with JMSDF for in-country SEIE suit servicing

As reported by Survitec, the global survival technology solutions provider has secured a multi-year servicing contract from Sojitz Aerospace on behalf of the Japanese Maritime Self-Defence Force (JMSDF).

This contract involves servicing the Submarine Escape Immersion Equipment (SEIE) MK11 suits used on the JMSDF’s submarine fleet.

Survitec has established an in-country servicing capability through a strategic partnership with Marinair Liferaft Co. Ltd., headquartered in Kawasaki.

Marinair Liferaft Co. will handle the servicing of the SEIE MK11 suits in Japan, ensuring adherence to stringent quality standards.

This collaboration aims to provide the JMSDF with more efficient access to essential maintenance and quality control, reducing logistical expenses and investing in regional capabilities.

Benefits of the partnership

Marinair Liferaft Co. will conduct the servicing of the SEIE MK11 suits in collaboration with Survitec.

This partnership is designed to ensure cost-effective operations and bolster the local defence industry by creating employment opportunities in Kobe, where the facility is being established.

The initiative supports growing annual capacity and meets high demand, which underpins future agreements.

David Stelling, Business Development Director at Survitec, stated: “We are excited about this partnership with Marinair and the opportunity it presents to further strengthen our relationship with the Japan Maritime Self-Defence Force.

“This strategic collaboration underscores our commitment to providing tailored solutions and exceptional service to our clients while driving strategic growth in key markets.”

Comprehensive inspection and testing

The scope of supply for this contract includes thorough inspection and testing of the SEIE MK11 suits.

This encompasses visual inspections, stole pressure tests, ascent hood tests, air holding tests, inlet valve blast tests, and CO2 cylinder weight checks.

This comprehensive approach ensures the reliability and safety of the equipment, critical for the JMSDF’s operations.

The initial multi-year contract reinforces Survitec’s position as a leader in Submarine Escape Immersion Equipment (SEIE).

The strategic in-country partnership with Marinair Liferaft Co.

represents an advancement in delivering customer-centric support tailored to the specific needs of Japan’s Maritime Self-Defence Force.

Survitec highlights increase in ship fire safety deficiencies

Increase in fire safety deficiencies reported

Global Survival Technology solutions provider Survitec has highlighted the dangers of inadequate maintenance, testing, and inspection of ship fire safety systems in a new white paper.

The paper points to an alarming increase in fire-safety-related deficiencies found during Port State Control Inspections and subsequent ship detentions, as reported by Survitec.

The white paper, released at the Posidonia tradeshow, emphasises that fire continues to be a leading cause of major shipping incidents, accounting for over 20% of total losses and the most expensive cause of marine insurance claims.

In 2022, the Paris MoU recorded the highest level of fire safety deficiencies in a decade, and the Tokyo MoU reported an increase in detentions, with 15,562 deficiencies in 2023.

Economic downturn impacting fire safety standards

Survitec has found that the economic downturn and the emphasis on cost reduction post-COVID have negatively impacted fire safety.

Some shipowners and operators are maintaining and inspecting safety equipment themselves to save costs.

Metkel Yohannes, Director of Service & Rental Solutions at Survitec, said: “We’re finding basic errors and oversights that do not become apparent until either the ship fails an inspection and is detained – or there is a fire.”

He cited an example where a crew installed a new foam pump but forgot to remove a protective cap, causing a blockage.

Disparity in service quality and use of incorrect parts

Survitec also finds issues with the quality of parts used and the service quality between providers.

In CO2 firefighting systems, for example, hydraulic hoses are often mistaken for high-pressure hoses, which can burst under pressure.

Yohannes noted: “We see evidence of a slip in standards regarding basic safety practices but also a wide disparity in service quality between service providers.

“Approval stamps are being applied to fire systems and appliances that would or should not pass inspection.”

New fire risks with alternative fuels

The white paper highlights an incident involving a bulk carrier where a fire broke out shortly after leaving port, despite the vessel having passed a fire safety inspection.

Over half of the CO2 cylinders failed to activate, causing significant damage and resulting in repair costs estimated between $2-3 million USD.

Yohannes commented: “The development and introduction of alternative fuels, including the use and transportation of lithium-ion batteries, brings new fire risks and safety challenges that can’t be ignored.

“Fire systems and equipment must be maintained and tested as mandated by SOLAS, the IMO and the FSS code.”

Survitec achieves ISO 23678 certification to enhance maritime safety

Survitec’s milestone in maritime safety

Survitec, a leading provider of Survival Technology solutions, has achieved the ISO 23678:2022 1-4 certification, positioning itself at the forefront of maritime safety.

This certification, introduced in 2022, sets a global standard for the training of personnel involved in lifeboat inspections, aligning with the requirements of resolution MSC.402(96).

Additionally, this achievement has played a crucial role in Survitec receiving renewed approval for the maintenance, inspection, and testing of lifeboats under Lloyd’s Register (LR) classification.

The impact on safety and training

Matt Macfarlane, Head of Service Operations at Survitec, highlighted the significance of this certification: “By adhering to the stringent principles incorporated into the ISO 23678 standard, we have significantly broadened our scope of certification, enabling qualified and certified technicians to inspect, maintain and test an increasingly extensive range of equipment supplied by an array of different manufacturers.

“Survitec’s achievement ensures customers receive a top-tier service backed by rigorous standards and a commitment to multi-brand service excellence with unmatched authorisations and accreditations from over 70 flag States.”

Advancements in technician competence and assurance

Survitec’s Marine Training Academy (MTA) has also successfully received certification to the new ISO training standard, further demonstrating the company’s commitment to enhancing maritime safety.

In tandem, Survitec developed a dynamic database tool to track technician competence, ensuring compliance with certification requirements and aligning with audit standards.

Paul Watkins, Survitec’s Regulatory & Compliance Manager, said: “We are delighted to have received this certification as ISO 23678 delivers greater assurance to classification surveyors and flag States and reinforces our commitment to delivering a high-quality service to all our customers.”

The call for wider adoption of ISO 23678

The certification not only marks a significant step for Survitec but also sets a precedent for the maritime industry.

Macfarlane emphasized the potential impact of widespread adoption: “The ISO standard has the potential to significantly improve maritime safety globally through the standardised certification of service technicians.

“As the largest company to achieve this standard, we see great benefit to the industry, and we call on regulators to adopt it to significantly enhance safety standards.”

IFSJ Comment

The achievement of ISO 23678 certification by Survitec demonstrates a commitment to the highest standards of safety and training, serving as a benchmark for others in the sector.

This certification not only enhances Survitec’s ability to provide exceptional service across a broad range of equipment but also reinforces the importance of standardized training and certification in improving global maritime safety.

The call for broader adoption of the ISO 23678 standard underscores a collective responsibility towards enhancing safety practices, potentially transforming the landscape of maritime safety worldwide.

Survitec enhances fire safety for alternative fuel-powered ships

Survitec responds to the demand for advanced fire safety

In a significant development for maritime safety, Survitec, a leading provider of Survival Technology solutions, has announced enhancements to its Dry Chemical Powder (DCP) fire extinguishing system.

The upgrades, designed to offer improved protection for vessels operating on LNG and LPG fuels, have received type approval certification, marking a significant milestone in the maritime industry’s transition to cleaner fuels.

The reconfigured DCP system is already being specified for both newbuild and existing vessels, demonstrating immediate industry recognition.

Survitec’s first order for the upgraded system will be installed on a 16,000 TEU container ship currently under construction at a newbuild yard in South Korea.

Rafal Kolodziejski, Head of Product Support & Development – Fire Systems at Survitec, commented on the importance of this innovation: “This first order represents a crucial step forward in ensuring the safety of ships running on LNG or LPG.

The Survitec DCP system offers comprehensive bunkering station protection, cost-efficiency, and versatility for a variety of vessel types, whether newbuild or retrofit.”

Technological advancements in fire safety

Survitec’s newly enhanced DCP system includes several key components such as an extinguishant storage container, nitrogen gas cylinder, safety valves, a pressure regulator, piping, and discharge devices, including nozzles.

A notable advancement is the ability to combine longer lengths of discharge piping with smaller volumes of powder, optimising fire protection for bunkering stations and fuel-switching operations across a broader range of vessels.

The system’s design allows for increased pipe runs, up to 69m, with the potential for further extension on a case-by-case basis.

This flexibility is a significant improvement over traditional systems, enabling more efficient and adaptable fire safety solutions.

Piotr Bulas, Product Manager for DCP solutions at Survitec, elaborated on the system’s unique features: “Our solution is designed to support potassium bicarbonate or sulphate salts as the dry power medium, offering multiple advantages, including smaller, lighter, and more easily accommodated hardware, as well as lower overall cost of consumables.”

A cost-effective and efficient solution for maritime safety

Survitec’s nitrogen-propelled DCP solution is designed to meet the stringent requirements of both newbuilds and existing ships undergoing dual fuel propulsion solution retrofits.

The system ensures constant deployment at a minimum of 3.5kg/second for 45 seconds using just 175kg of powder, a significant reduction in consumables compared to competing solutions.

Kolodziejski further highlighted the system’s efficiency and cost benefits: “With the DCP system from Survitec, shipowners can often safeguard bunkering stations on both sides of the ship with just one DCP unit without compromising performance. This reduces installation and maintenance costs.”

Survitec’s commitment to innovation extends to maintenance, with the new DCP system designed for easy servicing and testing without disassembling core components.

The system is delivered as a single, compact unit for ‘plug and play’ installation, simplifying the shipbuilding process and ensuring long-term reliability and safety.

IFSJ Comment

The introduction of Survitec’s type-approved dry chemical powder system upgrades represents a timely response to the maritime industry’s shift towards alternative fuels.

By enhancing fire safety measures for vessels powered by LNG and LPG, Survitec is setting a new standard in maritime safety technology.

The system’s cost-efficiency, versatility, and technological advancements offer comprehensive protection for a variety of vessel types, ensuring the safety of maritime operations in an era of cleaner fuels.

This initiative underscores the critical role of innovation in advancing maritime safety and the importance of adopting flexible, efficient solutions to meet the evolving challenges of the industry.

Live discharge testing for CO2 fire systems reveals critical safety insights

Global Survival Technology solutions provider Survitec has released the results of pioneering tests conducted on high-pressure CO2 fire extinguishing systems aboard three Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessels.

The tests confirmed the efficacy of live discharge testing in verifying the performance of fire extinguishing systems, beyond theoretical simulations.

Survitec validates live testing forCO2 fire systems

Michal Sadzynski, Product Manager at Survitec, emphasized the findings’ implications: “The important take-home for the industry here is that some of the protected spaces did not pass the tests the first time. T

“his suggests there may be other vessels and offshore structures out there with potentially underperforming CO2 fire extinguishing systems in fire-critical areas such as switchboard rooms, engine rooms, and generator houses.”

Challenges uncovered in live discharge scenarios

Survitec designed a new set of test protocols to align with the latest NFPA12 standard amendments.

These initial tests on the FPSOs covered a range of scenarios, including both moored and docked vessels during conversion.

Sadzynski shared details of the testing process: “The devised live test comes as close as is practical to creating the demands of an actual fire aboard.

“On large vessels like FPSOs, it involves opening hundreds of cylinders – for example, in the engine room of one of these FPSOs, 315 cylinders were released.”

“We have found that the release of large amounts of highly pressurised gas into a partially closed space usually uncovers some engineering challenges within the protected space, rather than with the delivery system itself,” Sadzynski added, detailing the engineering issues that surfaced during testing.

A particular instance of these challenges was witnessed in the switchboard room aboard the first FPSO, where gas-tightness due to the air conditioning system’s specifications led to unforeseen complications during testing.

The pressure increase caused door damage, compromising the room’s integrity and allowing CO2 to escape, which resulted in test failure.

Implementing solutions and acknowledging costs

On another FPSO, leaks within a machinery space led to CO2 concentration drops, highlighting the issue that not all spaces are airtight.

Sadzynski explained the rectifications for such issues: “There are often relatively simple and inexpensive fixes in these scenarios.

“Overpressure in air-conditioned spaces can be resolved by implementing a time delay on one of the fire dampers.

“This allows over-pressurised gas to escape from the space and then closes when the pressure becomes stable, thereby keeping the CO2 concentration at the required level.”

However, he acknowledged the cost implications of live testing, as it exhausts CO2 cylinders which then require refilling, and the need to ensure personnel safety during tests on operational vessels.

Still, the potential cost of unverified systems in an emergency was presented as a much greater risk.

Sadzynski summarised the overarching goal and benefit of the study: “It is important to emphasise that designing a vessel is a highly complex process… This study shows very clearly the limitations of modelling… versus a real-world test.”

He further encouraged the adoption of live testing guidelines to improve the protection of lives and assets and to assist in designing more effective fire suppression systems.

IFSJ Comment

The findings from Survitec’s study highlight an often-overlooked aspect of maritime safety: the reliability of fire extinguishing systems in real-world scenarios.

The fact that not all spaces with CO2 systems passed live discharge testing underscores the necessity for regular and rigorous checks, which goes beyond standard compliance.

It provides a stark reminder that even with advanced modelling techniques, nothing can substitute for the robustness of a live test.

By drawing attention to the need for stringent testing protocols, the study serves as a catalyst for improved safety measures within the industry.

The consequential data derived from such studies are invaluable for both maritime safety experts and engineers in refining fire suppression technology and strategies.

Ship safety in the modern age with Survitec

Rafal Kolodziejski, Head of Product Support and Development at Survitec explains how SMARR-TI Enhances Fire Safety in the Maritime Industry

In an era marked by rapid technological advancements and evolving challenges in the maritime industry, ship safety management has never been more vital.

The introduction of new fuels, more complex systems, and the trend towards autonomous shipping has brought about new safety risks and hurdles.

The traditional safety management methods are becoming insufficient, leaving the maritime industry in need of innovative solutions.

Enter the Safety Management and Rapid Response Technology Interface (SMARR-TI), a ground-breaking solution that represents a transformative step forward in fire safety from Survitec.

By integrating fire detection and suppression systems within a single, interactive platform, SMARR-TI offers a comprehensive approach to onboard safety, addressing the contemporary maritime safety challenges.

Rafal Kolodziejski, Head of Product Support and Development at Survitec, reveals the direction of the maritime industry’s safety protocols and provides a closer look at the necessary innovations required to ensure safety at sea.

Can you explain the importance of ship safety management?

This is an exciting time for the maritime industry; we’re in a period of great change. There are key trends such as digitalisation and autonomous shipping driving the development of new and more advanced technologies.

At the same time, there is the drive towards greater sustainability, with the shift towards fuels that are more environmentally friendly, and the introduction of new legislative requirements to help reduce greenhouse emissions.

With new developments come new challenges. Each new or alternative fuel has its own safety risks and challenges.

For example, there is much discussion around effective fire suppression methods for methanol dual-fuelled ships, and for electrical propulsion systems with energy storage spaces.

The safe transportation of electrical vehicles and the risks associated with lithium-ion batteries is another focus area.

Furthermore, with autonomous shipping and the trend towards ships operating with fewer – or no – crew onboard, perhaps with operations being monitored from the shore, this then presents other safety risks and challenges that must be addressed.

Consequently, we see a greater need among ship owners and managers for solutions that can help to support crew with: Effective emergency procedures – i.e., procedures that are transparent and easy to follow; Early detection – to help identify changing conditions as early as possible to prevent a fire from happening; and Rapid response – to support fast and effective decision-making, especially in emergency situations.

How do traditional safety management methods fall short when it comes to contemporary needs of the maritime industry?

With the new fire risks and safety challenges associated with the new fuels and technologies of today, there is a renewed focus on fire prevention, and the possibility of detecting pre-fire conditions that can either allow for suitable preventive measures to be taken to avoid a fire from starting and/or that allows the crew to contain the fire more quickly and minimise damage.

We can also consider the number and complexity of the systems implemented on board a ship today, and the challenges this can present to crew.

A safety management system can potentially integrate different safety subsystems, allowing crew to manage them more easily and efficiently within one control system.

Diagnostics and preventive maintenance are also increasingly important, to ensure that the proper maintenance regimes are observed to keep safety systems running efficiently and to avoid any interruptions to service.

Remote support and monitoring services can also provide crew with fast access to expert technical support.

Systems can be monitored remotely – and even controlled, if required – from the shore, with the potential to log and track faults and analyse the data for insight on faults and/or behaviours.

What is SMARR-TI?

SMARR-TI stands for Safety Management And Rapid Response – Technology Interface. SMARR-TI is an interactive safety management solution that allows crew to monitor and control all their onboard fire safety systems – that is, their fire detection, fire prevention and fire suppression systems – within one integrated and easy-to-use solution.

SMARR-TI is unique in that it integrates both fire detection and fire suppression systems in one solution.

Currently, there is no other digitised safety monitoring solution that does this to such an extent.

How does the integration of fire detection and suppression systems contribute to enhanced safety onboard?

The aim is to give early warning of changes in a quick and effective way, and then to enable swift action to prevent a fire from happening.

A graphical visualisation of the fire systems on board the vessel is paired with real-time status updates and notifications, so crew receive early warning of any changing conditions.

In the event of a fault or alarm, crew has full visibility of the location of the alarm; the equipment at their disposal; and the ability to deploy systems automatically where possible, allowing them to take swift, decisive action to prevent or contain a fire, and protect onboard safety.

Can you talk about the interactive features of SMARR-TI?

In the event of a fire or an alarm, crew can see instantly where the alarm is located, visualised on the ship layout, and also the nature of the alarm (e.g., whether it’s the result of a technical fault or whether there is actually a fire).

Furthermore, they can select the protected space on the ship plan visualisation to see which equipment is available in that space; and then have the capability to activate a firefighting system within SMARR-TI by following the screen prompts.

All of these actions can be performed within SMARR-TI; all the information the crew needs is at their fingertips, thus shortening the time to action.

How does the SMARR-TI system supplement the SOLAS requirements for general arrangement plans onboard?

SOLAS Chapter II-2, Regulation 15.2.4 requires general arrangement plans to be permanently exhibited for the guidance of the ship’s officers.

These plans must show: structural fire prevention measures onboard ship (fire doors, fire zone barriers, etc); location of firefighting equipment; and how to access the different compartments & decks.

These are generally static plans, normally printed/mounted on walls, and supplemented by, e.g. instruction manuals for the different systems/equipment.

SMARR-TI supplements these general arrangement plans by providing a digital, interactive, graphical visualisation of the ship layout and all the structural fire prevention measures on board with Fire Detection & Suppression systems attached plus real-time alerts and notifications to alert crew of any changing conditions.

This means that not only can the crew see instantly where the alarm originates, they can also differentiate between e.g. a technical fault or the presence of smoke or flame.

The operating procedures for deployment of the firefighting systems can then also be displayed on screen, so the crew has all the information they need in one place to support quick and effective decision-making in the event of a fire.

Could you explain the specific role of SMARR-TI during a potential fire hazard?

Within SMARR-TI, crew members can receive instant notifications of technical faults impacting system delivery, such as faulty connections or interruptions to power.

They also receive warnings of pre-alarm conditions, such as temperatures exceeding predefined limits, or the presence of smoke or flame.

SMARR-TI allows them to distinguish immediately between routine maintenance issues and situations requiring an emergency response, so they can manage resources accordingly.

Furthermore, the crew can identify the precise location and exact nature of the alarm instantly on the ship plan visualisation.

They can also integrate and control their CCTV cameras within SMARR-TI, allowing for an immediate view of the affected zone and local areas.

This enables them to mobilise the crew more quickly and efficiently, equipped to take immediate, preventive action to secure the space and protect life.

Should there be a fire, crew members can immediately identify the safety systems at their disposal within the protected space.

They can then select a system within SMARR-TI and follow the step-by-step instructions displayed on screen to proceed towards deployment.

They can sound the alarm, close fire doors and fire dampers, shut down ventilation where necessary, and trigger signals to the public announcement and alarm monitoring systems, all within the same system.

The crew is also able to activate fire suppression systems, such as water mist, automatically, which reduces the time to deployment.

They can follow the operating procedures displayed on screen to guide them through system deployment, support effective decision-making, and reduce the risk of human error in high-stress situations.

The ultimate aim with SMARR-TI is to streamline firefighting operations and save valuable seconds or even minutes in an emergency, to help protect life and minimise damage.

Can you share your experience developing SMARR-TI alongside Turkish shipyard Tersan and Havila Voyages?

SMARR-TI was designed according to the requirements of Havila Shipping ASA, which had experience of similar systems from other suppliers.

The purpose behind building the application was to create a tool that could provide a graphical representation of the text information provided via their dedicated fire detection system.

From the start, it was made clear that this information should be presented clearly and effectively so that it should be immediately apparent to crew when there was an alarm/notification requiring their attention.

SMARR-TI was designed to depict both the location of the fire and the fire extinguishing system available for use, and then also allow for that fire extinguishing system to be released remotely where possible, with crew able to follow operating instructions presented on screen.

Most importantly, the required actions at each stage had to be intuitive and efficient: the application had to be simple and easy to use and to facilitate swift, decisive action.

What are Survitec’s future plans for the expansion of SMARR-TI?

The official launch of SMARR-TI at Nor-shipping in June generated a lot of interest, and we have had many interesting discussions, not only with shipowners and shipyards, but also with other technology providers and suppliers of fire solutions who are interested in the potential of SMARR-TI to support additional safety features and systems. 

Today we have SMARR-TI Mark-1, which integrates Fire Detection & Fire Suppression systems, however we have many other ideas on how we can further develop SMARR-TI, to support effective and efficient safety management – for example, the integration of loose fire equipment (information on location and servicing requirements); support for monitoring fire patrols; and, of course, the integration of other safety systems – to highlight just a few of the ideas that are currently on our radar.

This exclusive article was originally published in the September 2023 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.