IAWF releases program schedule for International Fire Behaviour and Fuels Conference

Conference program and format

The 8th International Fire Behaviour and Fuels Conference will be held in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, with early registration on Monday 27 April and sessions running from Tuesday 28 April to Friday 1 May.

The International Association of Wildland Fire (IAWF) has released the detailed program schedule.

The schedule includes keynote and panel sessions from Tuesday to Thursday, alongside topic streams, exhibitors and an opening and poster reception on Tuesday.

The programme also lists oral presentations, lightning talks and more than 100 poster presentations.

IAWF said: “We are pleased to release the detailed program schedule.

“In addition to the dymamic keynote presentations and panels, we will offer oral presentations, lightning talks and over 100 poster presentations.”

Registration, workshops and field trips

The conference is fully in-person with no virtual presentations, with access to program sessions included for full registrations or for the nominated day of attendance for one-day registrations.

Registration also includes refreshments during morning and afternoon breaks, a social reception on Tuesday evening, a dinner or gathering on Wednesday evening, and lunch on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.

IAWF Member and Student rates are available.

Workshops are scheduled for Friday 1 May from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM, with a cost of $50 per workshop and morning tea included.

The workshop titles listed are Big Weather Data for Fire Management, Igniting research – Fire Behaviour and Fuels research translation workshop, Measuring fire management effectiveness using performance indicators, and Navigating the Social Dimensions of Cascading and Compounding Disasters.

Field trips are also scheduled for Friday 1 May and run at the same time as the workshops.

The field trips listed are Applied pyrogeography: from field to laboratory and kunyani/Mt Wellington Bushfire Risk Management.

IAWF describes the conference as a forum to document past fire management experience, showcase current work, and share emerging research, innovation and techniques on fire management.

Wildland Fire Service to unify Interior wildfire programmes across bureaus

Who will lead the Wildland Fire Service rollout?

The US Department of the Interior (DOI) is moving to establish the U.S. Wildland Fire Service, with a new leader appointed to oversee implementation, the department said on 12 January 2026 in Washington.

The DOI described the plan as an effort to unify wildland fire management programmes across its bureaus and offices.

Wildland fire responsibilities are currently distributed across the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Office of Aviation Services and the Office of Wildland Fire.

The DOI said the goal is to streamline decision-making, improve operational efficiency and strengthen the department’s ability to respond quickly to wildfire threats.

The department said the service is intended to support protection of lives, communities, critical infrastructure and public and tribal lands through a more integrated wildland fire management approach.

Leadership and implementation

The DOI selected Chief Brian Fennessy to oversee the creation of the U.S. Wildland Fire Service, who brings experience leading large wildfire response operations in California.

Fennessy said: “Wildfire response depends on coordination, clarity and speed.

“This initial planning effort is about bringing programs together, strengthening cooperation across the Department and building a framework that better supports firefighters and the communities they serve.

“I want to thank Secretary Burgum for this opportunity to serve in this role and look forward to working alongside of the brave men and women of the fire community.”

The DOI said Fennessy previously served as Chief of the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department and as Fire Chief of the Orange County Fire Authority.

It said he began his career with the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, and has led wildfire suppression, aviation operations and emergency response.

Administration policy context

The DOI said the creation of the U.S. Wildland Fire Service aligns with the Trump Administration’s approach to modernising wildfire response, mitigation and prevention, as outlined in Executive Order 14308, Empowering Commonsense Wildfire Prevention and Response.

Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said: “Wildfire does not discriminate.

“It impacts rural towns and major cities, businesses and families alike.

“Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, the Department of the Interior is taking decisive steps to strengthen coordination and preparedness as we confront an escalating wildfire challenge.”

The department also said wildfires are increasing in size, intensity and cost, with impacts it listed including communities, infrastructure, tribal trust assets, agriculture and local economies.

The DOI said it views wildfires as posing risks to public health, energy systems, water supplies and national security.

The department said the new structure is intended to position it to meet evolving wildfire challenges.

International Association of Wildland Fire opens applications for 2026 Mentoring Program cycle

IAWF opens 2026 Mentoring Program cycle

The International Association of Wildland Fire (IAWF) has opened applications for the next Mentoring Program cycle, which will run from February to July 2026.

IAWF states that the Mentoring Program depends on mentors who guide, encourage and share tools, networks and expertise to support mentees.

The organisation adds that mentees are expected to be curious, open-minded, honest about their goals and ready to learn.

According to IAWF, mentors and mentees form partnerships that support problem-solving, resilience and professional development across the fire management community.

The association says the new cycle will give participants access to structured guidance, feedback and opportunities to build professional connections.

IAWF confirms that the programme is open to members and that mentees may request a membership fee waiver where cost is a barrier.

Application process and matching arrangements

IAWF explains that it opens the Mentoring Program for applications twice a year.

For the 2026 cycle, the organisation states that the application period is open through Monday 12 January 2026.

IAWF also notes elsewhere in its material that interested participants are asked to sign up by Monday 19 January 2026.

The association outlines a staged process in which applications are first received and reviewed, then used to match mentors and mentees.

Matches are made on the basis of participants’ interests and geographic location, according to IAWF.

The organisation encourages both face to face mentoring and online remote mentoring, depending on where mentors and mentees are based.

IAWF says both parties must commit to a six month mentoring period running from February to July 2026.

The association plans to hold kick off meetings via Zoom in February as the mentoring cycle begins.

According to IAWF, mentor information will be sent to mentees between Monday 13 January and Tuesday 27 January 2026 so they can indicate preferred matches.

The organisation states that it will review preferences and introduce matches on Wednesday 28 January 2026.

IAWF membership is required to participate in the Mentoring Program, although mentees can request a waiver if the fee presents a burden.

The association says it will provide participants with resources such as checklists, agreements and practical suggestions to support the mentoring relationship.

Qualities sought in programme mentors

IAWF describes mentoring as a process of direct transfer of experience and knowledge from one person to another.

The association traces the word “mentor” to the character Mentor in the ancient Greek story of Telemachus, where the term came to mean “trusted tutor”.

According to IAWF, effective mentors are committed to their mentees’ learning and project goals.

The organisation highlights the ability to give positive feedback, encouragement and advice when requested as a key quality.

IAWF states that good mentors are interested in seeing and supporting the mentee’s growth in both professional and personal areas.

The association notes that mentors should ask key questions that help mentees develop problem-solving skills, creative thinking and independence.

According to IAWF, mentors should be able to set clear expectations and commitments and communicate these openly.

The organisation also points to generosity with tools and approaches that support others to learn.

IAWF adds that mentors should be ready to share relevant contacts and networks and to identify additional expertise when needed.

Expectations placed on participating mentees

IAWF outlines several characteristics that help mentees benefit from the Mentoring Program.

The association states that good mentees are willing to ask questions even when this feels difficult.

IAWF notes that some mentees can be timid and recommends providing prompts or ice breakers to support early conversations.

According to the organisation, mentees need to be open minded about what they do not yet know.

IAWF comments that mentees who believe they already have all the answers are less likely to benefit from the programme.

The association stresses that effective mentees are honest about how they want to grow.

It notes that talking about areas for development or ambitious career goals can be challenging but is important for targeted advice.

According to IAWF, mentees should be eager to learn more about their profession.

The organisation remarks that mentees who are not ready to engage with learning may not yet be suited to the programme.

Leadership reflections on mentoring practice

IAWF shared reflections on mentoring from Mike DeGrosky, Past President of the association and a long-standing advocate of mentoring.

DeGrosky describes how mentors have influenced his career and leadership approach, even without formal mentoring arrangements.

He contrasts temporary mentors who offered brief but meaningful input with those who played more extensive roles in his professional development.

He outlines ways in which effective mentoring can support people to pursue their potential and come closer to being the person they can be.

Mike DeGrosky, Chief of the Fire and Aviation Management Bureau for the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Division of Forestry, said: “Technically, mentoring is a professional relationship in which an experienced person assists a less experienced person in developing specific skills and knowledge that will enhance the less-experienced person’s professional and personal growth.

“Effective organizations know that people perform better, advance faster, and choose to stay in their organizations when they have effective mentors.

“Think of mentoring both as a powerful form of leadership and as a serious responsibility to another person.

“When we choose to mentor someone, we are committing to helping someone reach their potential and come closer to the person they want to be.

“A mentor’s fundamental purpose is to help the mentee find and release the more ideal person that exists within them.

“High-quality mentoring relationships benefit both mentor and mentee.

“In my experience, the best mentors achieve all three by fully and selflessly committing to the mentee.

“Mentors are people committed to helping others become more complete versions of who they are, and that takes being “all-in” for your protege.

“Consequently, mentoring needs to be taken seriously and done well.

“I recommend that, if you intend to be someone’s mentor, that you focus on the principles of helping your mentee identify and release what is within them, focusing on the relationship, seeking mutual benefit, being humble in your mentorship, focusing on the whole person, listening, being loyal, and honesty.”

DeGrosky ties these principles back to organisational practice, noting that structured mentoring programmes can support both employee development and retention when applied carefully.

How the Mentoring Program connects to practice in wildland fire

The International Association of Wildland Fire describes its Mentoring Program as a way to build problem-solving ability, resilience and professional development across the fire management community.

These aims are directly relevant to fire and rescue chiefs and senior officers who oversee leadership development and progression pathways in wildland fire organisations.

For training officers and instructors, the six month structure, supporting resources and combination of face to face and remote options could provide a framework for developing less experienced personnel.

Emergency and disaster response managers working with wildland fire operations may see practical value in mentees gaining access to wider networks and experience through structured mentoring relationships.

For fire engineering consultants and other technical specialists engaged in wildland fire work, the matching of mentors and mentees by interest and region could support knowledge exchange on evolving practice.

The focus on honest goal setting, clear expectations and reciprocal professional growth may also inform how organisations design their own internal mentoring arrangements beyond the association’s programme.

FSRI introduces new WUI firefighting training on structure triage and risk assessment

Structure triage course expands WUI firefighting training

The Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI), part of UL Research Institutes, has released a new training course titled Structure Triage Considerations for Wildland Urban Interface Firefighting.

According to FSRI, the course bridges the gap between traditional wildland and structural firefighting training, providing guidance on assessing structure defensibility and allocating resources under extreme conditions.

The course is available free of charge and includes a certificate of completion upon successful completion.

It has a duration of 140 minutes and was last updated on Monday 22 September 2025.

The content is categorised under Wildland/WUI and focuses on helping firefighters operate effectively in mixed fire environments.

Course content and learning objectives

FSRI said the course enables participants to identify fuels present in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), both natural and manmade, and understand how these fuels influence fire spread mechanisms.

Participants will also learn to analyse structural ignition pathways and their contribution to ignition risk and fire spread, supporting informed decision making in resource-limited scenarios.

The training covers how community layout, access and egress, and surrounding landscape influence resilience and conflagration potential.

FSRI added that the course integrates research findings and post-fire analyses to demonstrate how both structural and community features affect outcomes in WUI incidents.

Research-based training approach

The course builds on FSRI’s wider research into WUI incidents, combining scientific analysis with practical field application.

By interpreting data from previous fires, the course highlights how ignition pathways and fuel types interact in densely populated areas exposed to wildland fire conditions.

It also draws attention to how environmental and community-level variables can determine whether a structure is defensible or beyond protection.

According to UL Research Institutes, this approach aims to strengthen firefighters’ ability to make rapid, evidence-based decisions during fast-moving incidents.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The new FSRI course is particularly relevant for fire and rescue training officers, incident commanders and firefighters operating in areas where wildland and urban environments meet.

It offers structured guidance on evaluating structural defensibility and resource allocation during WUI events, aligning with current challenges faced by crews responding to climate-driven fire activity.

Fire engineers, risk assessors and community resilience planners may also find the material valuable for understanding how design, access and landscape influence fire behaviour in interface zones.

The integration of scientific data and operational lessons makes the course a useful tool for those involved in both tactical response and long-term preparedness planning.

Debate grows over human role in New Brunswick wildfire causes

Government urged to identify wildfire causes

New Brunswick’s former public safety minister has called for greater transparency on the causes of more than 400 wildfires recorded across the province this year.

Canadian Underwriter reported that Kris Austin, a Progressive Conservative MLA and former cabinet minister, raised the issue during a standing committee on public accounts meeting on Wednesday.

Austin said he believed many of the fires were caused by people and urged the government to investigate and release more information.

He said: “How are these fires starting? It seems to be a big question mark. I get the impression government is a little hesitant to push on that.

“And that’s something I’d like to see more information on. How are these fires starting? We know anecdotally, at least, that a lot of them seem to be human-induced.”

He cited national data indicating that in most regions outside New Brunswick, human activity is responsible for more than half of all wildfires.

Provincial authorities have stated their priority has been firefighting operations, not identifying causes.

Officials have not linked any of this season’s wildfires to arson or other deliberate acts.

Officials continue wildfire investigations

According to the Department of Natural Resources, several fires in the province’s northeast during August were triggered by dry lightning.

Other incidents remain under investigation, including the Irishtown wildfire near Moncton, which prompted evacuation standby orders for 1,500 residents in early August.

Deputy Minister Cade Libby told Austin that the Irishtown investigation was still ongoing.

Libby said: “I don’t want to speculate at this point, other than we are completing an investigation of the start of that fire, and we’ll see what the conclusion is after that.”

Austin said reporters should continue to question government departments about the findings but declined to elaborate on his own view.

During the total fire ban imposed between August and September, 43 people were fined for violations including illegal campfires.

One forestry operation received the largest fine for failing to have required firefighting equipment.

The total value of penalties exceeded $2,000.

Rising wildfire numbers exceed long-term averages

Deputy Minister Libby said the wildfire season could extend beyond its typical end date of 31 October due to ongoing dry conditions.

He said: “This is probably one of the worst years we’ve had. Could we see more starts or ignitions? Yes, we could, especially if we don’t get the rain. Today’s rain is helping, but we do need more of it.”

As of Wednesday, 421 wildfires had burned more than 3,500 hectares across New Brunswick.

This figure is well above the 25-year average of 240 fires and 312 hectares burned annually.

No lives or homes were lost, though several firefighters were hospitalised for heat exhaustion and power infrastructure near Miramichi was damaged.

Authorities lifted a province-wide fire ban this week following rainfall but warned it could return if dry weather resumes.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The investigation into wildfire causes in New Brunswick holds relevance for public safety authorities, emergency management planners and wildfire response coordinators.

Determining the proportion of fires caused by human activity compared with natural events could influence future prevention campaigns, enforcement priorities and seasonal fire restrictions.

Extended wildfire seasons and higher ignition rates also have implications for resource planning, firefighter fatigue management and equipment availability across regional agencies.

Accurate cause data would enable more targeted education for residents and industries operating in high-risk areas such as forestry and recreation.

Why Namibia’s Etosha wildfire sparks anger over response delays

Etosha National Park wildfire burns 775,000 hectares before being contained

Namibia’s government has confirmed that the wildfire which swept through Etosha National Park has been contained after more than a week of burning.

The fire broke out on 22 September and affected around 775,000 hectares inside the park and 171,000 hectares beyond it.

Prime Minister Tjitunga Elijah Ngurare said on Monday that all fires were now contained, with mop-up and monitoring operations continuing.

He said on Facebook that ten separate blazes had been identified and brought under control.

Government action and deployment timeline

According to the government, 49 soldiers were deployed on Saturday, followed by a further 500 the next day to support firefighting efforts.

The fire, which began near areas used for charcoal production, destroyed about a third of Etosha National Park’s total area.

The Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism said at least nine antelopes were killed and one pangolin had been rescued.

An elephant death was reported but has not been confirmed.

Defence Minister Frans Kapofi said that troops were being sent from multiple regions to assist with firefighting operations.

Criticism from local volunteers and private operators

Sean Naude, head of the Namibian Marshall Rangers, said that although the fires were “pretty much contained”, several were still active outside the park.

Naude criticised the government’s response, saying: “Why did they take so long to accept our help? [It took them] five days… [and] only on the fourth day was the army deployed.”

Frank Stein of Bay Air Aviation said he flew reconnaissance flights to assist farmers fighting to prevent the fire from spreading south of the park.

Stein said: “I read in the news that the Namibian Defence Force is fighting the fires and this might very well be, but I didn’t see them on the ground.

“All I saw was a handful of farmers, maybe 50 people in total, different groups, trying to fight the fires with, I wouldn’t even call it limited resources.”

Stein added that the government later asked private aviation firms to submit proposals for assistance, but that “by that time it’s too late. The economy of scale option has passed you.”

Prime minister calls for cooperation over blame

Prime Minister Ngurare acknowledged private efforts to help contain the fire and urged cooperation between citizens and the government.

He said on Facebook: “We appreciate those in the private sector that are assisting in curtailing the fire … Let’s work together: government and private sector. Let’s discourage those engaging in helpless blame game [sic]. Government has deployed resources to ensure the fire is contained.”

Etosha National Park, which spans 22,270 square kilometres, is home to 114 mammal species including the critically endangered black rhinoceros.

Its main attraction, the Etosha salt pan, draws large flocks of flamingoes during the rainy season that typically begins in October or November.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The wildfire in Namibia highlights the operational and logistical demands of large-scale wildfire containment in remote and resource-limited regions.

For wildfire response planners and incident commanders, the delay in troop deployment and coordination with private responders demonstrates the importance of early multi-agency integration and clear command structures.

Aviation-based reconnaissance was used to support situational awareness, showing how local air resources can supplement ground operations when central coordination is limited.

For emergency managers and government agencies, the incident reflects the need for established frameworks to engage volunteer groups and private operators before a crisis reaches critical scale.

Environmental protection and wildlife management professionals may also note the ecological effects of wildfires in national parks that host endangered species.

Wildfire in Namibia contained after major response: Summary

The Namibian government has confirmed that wildfires which began on 22 September 2025 in Etosha National Park have been contained after burning about 775,000 hectares inside the park and 171,000 hectares outside it.

The government deployed 49 soldiers on Saturday and a further 500 on Sunday following an emergency cabinet meeting, with mop-up and monitoring now ongoing.

Prime Minister Tjitunga Elijah Ngurare announced that all fires had been contained and urged cooperation between public and private responders.

Volunteer and private aviation groups criticised the response, claiming that support was delayed and that coordination between government and citizens came too late.

The Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism reported nine antelope deaths, one pangolin rescue and an unconfirmed elephant death as a result of the fires.

Etosha National Park covers about 22,270 square kilometres and is home to 114 mammal species including the critically endangered black rhinoceros.

This article contains information from the following source: The Guardian