CPD certificates now included in ASFP training

ASFP confirms CPD certification for training courses

The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has confirmed that all its passive fire protection training courses will now issue CPD Certificates of Attendance.

According to ASFP, the certificates will record learning hours and contribute directly to professional development records for participants.

The organisation stated that the certificates will be recognised by employers, professional bodies, and accreditation schemes, providing formal acknowledgement of skills gained.

ASFP explained that the change applies to all courses, whether delivered online or in a classroom setting.

It added that the certificates will allow delegates to record training hours and evidence their development activities in line with industry expectations.

Training hours assigned to courses

ASFP reported that its training programme now specifies the number of hours attached to each course.

For classroom-based training, Level 2 accounts for 30 hours, and Level 3 covers 42 hours.

In online delivery, awareness training is recorded as 1 hour, and introductory training is recorded as 3 hours.

The Firestopping for Installers course carries 3 hours, Level 2 options count as 8 hours, Level 2 single modules total 4 hours, and Level 3 includes 16 hours.

The association said these allocated hours ensure that delegates can consistently record progress toward CPD requirements.

Range of ASFP training courses

ASFP stated that its courses cater to both new entrants and experienced professionals working in passive fire protection.

The organisation explained that training begins with introductory online modules before progressing to qualifications that support candidates for Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) Level 2 and Level 3 exams.

It added that courses cover the design, installation, and inspection of passive fire protection systems, providing a comprehensive learning framework.

The association noted that in-house training is also available for organisations that wish to train multiple employees together, with delegate numbers capped between 10 and 20.

It advised that bespoke courses can be arranged to meet company-specific needs across the sector.

Alignment with industry standards

ASFP explained that its training structure is designed to support industry-wide competence and aligns with the Building Safety Act.

The organisation stated that short courses such as Building Safety Act awareness and Firestopping for Installers are included in the CPD certification programme.

It confirmed that the certification framework ensures that both introductory and advanced learning achievements are formally recognised.

ASFP added that this approach supports professional accountability and ongoing compliance with competence frameworks.

Connection with IFE examinations

ASFP reported that its Level 2 and Level 3 classroom courses prepare candidates for Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) examinations.

The organisation said that the training is structured to cover the full syllabus required by the IFE while also providing additional learning resources.

It noted that candidates must book their IFE exams separately, and advised scheduling training courses in advance to ensure preparation time.

ASFP added that delegates may also complete transitional e-learning modules to move from Level 2 to Level 3 qualifications.

The body explained that these pathways reinforce the role of ASFP training in supporting formal professional certification.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The introduction of CPD certificates for ASFP training provides fire safety professionals with documented evidence of continuing education.

It ensures that both short and extended training activities can be accurately recorded in CPD logs.

For employers, this provides a verifiable measure of workforce competence in passive fire protection.

It also allows professionals to demonstrate compliance with competence requirements under the Building Safety Act and other regulatory frameworks.

CPD certificates now included in ASFP training: Summary

The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has announced that all training courses will now issue CPD Certificates of Attendance.

The certificates will evidence learning hours and contribute to individuals’ professional development records.

ASFP confirmed that the change applies to both classroom and online training programmes.

Delegates will receive certificates listing the hours assigned to each completed course.

Classroom training includes Level 2 at 30 hours and Level 3 at 42 hours.

Online courses include awareness at 1 hour, introduction at 3 hours, Firestopping for Installers at 3 hours, Level 2 options at 8 hours, Level 2 single module at 4 hours, and Level 3 at 16 hours.

ASFP stated that the new framework ensures training achievements are recognised by employers, professional bodies, and accreditation schemes.

The association explained that the initiative supports competence standards in the fire protection sector.

It confirmed that its courses also prepare candidates for Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) Level 2 and Level 3 examinations.

ASFP added that in-house and bespoke training options are available for companies seeking group learning.

The body said that the certification framework aligns with the Building Safety Act.

It added that training achievements can now be clearly documented and verified.

This provides fire safety professionals with evidence of CPD activity for compliance and career development.

Carcinogens in Quincy gear: why firefighters say trust is broken

Image: IAFF [Quincy Mayor Thomas Koch discusses PFAS concerns at a press conference.]

Independent testing confirms presence of PFAS in new gear

Independent testing has confirmed the presence of carcinogens in turnout gear purchased by Quincy, Massachusetts.

According to the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), the equipment was advertised as PFAS-free but analysis showed high levels of the chemicals.

Quincy Mayor Thomas Koch said: “It’s truly outrageous to me, and deeply troubling, that we stand here today talking about how the new gear that we bought – sold to us on the premise that it had no PFAS in it, PFAS-free, that’s how it was advertised – was recently independently tested and came back highly positive with PFAS components in the gear.”

The IAFF stated that the results confirm fire fighters cannot rely on industry assurances about safety claims.

IAFF General President Edward Kelly said: “We cannot trust the manufacturers. We have to do independent testing on our own and ensure that what we’re being told is true – that dangerous chemicals are not infused in our gear.”

Context of PFAS risks and carcinogens

The IAFF reported that the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified some PFAS as carcinogenic.

It added that growing scientific evidence points to long-term health risks from exposure.

Quincy’s Local 792 requested the independent analysis after concerns about the PFAS-free claims made by the manufacturer.

The city had begun purchasing new gear two years ago, and the decision to test was made to confirm that equipment met safety expectations.

The IAFF explained that the findings from Quincy illustrate how carcinogens remain present in turnout gear despite marketing assurances.

Local leadership response in Quincy

Quincy Local 792 President Tom Bowes said the findings highlight the failures of manufacturers to provide safe equipment.

Bowes said: “The last few months dealing with this issue have been frustrating, angry, and, truthfully, sad, seeing what these companies continue to pull.

“These companies are paid to protect us, and they have failed miserably.

“We do this job because we love helping people.

All we ask is to be protected.”

Bowes confirmed that support from the IAFF, 3rd District Vice President Jay Colbert, the Professional Fire Fighters of Massachusetts, and city officials has helped Local 792 address the problem.

The IAFF stated that the collaboration has been essential in navigating the outcome of the testing.

NFPA standards restricting carcinogens in gear

The IAFF reported that its advocacy has helped shape new standards on turnout gear.

In October 2024, NFPA issued Standard 1970, the first to restrict PFAS and other hazardous substances in turnout gear.

The organisation said the standard introduces a Restricted Substances List prohibiting chemicals such as PFAS and certain flame retardants.

This provision takes effect on 18 September 2025, and manufacturers may continue selling existing gear until 18 March 2026.

It said this gap leaves a period where fire fighters could still purchase equipment containing PFAS or other substances.

The IAFF added that NFPA 1970 also changes UV Light Degradation tests to reflect real-world conditions.

The association reported that the new framework may support the development of next-generation protective clothing.

It said the standard also establishes voluntary labelling to indicate gear tested and found to contain 100 ppm or less total fluorine.

Calls for continued vigilance

Kelly said the issue is wider than Quincy alone.

He said: “This is not a Quincy-centric issue. This is something that impacts fire fighters across North America.

“We cannot trust corporations to tell us the truth.

They have failed us too many times.”

The IAFF explained that while the NFPA changes are progress, the Quincy results highlight the ongoing need for independent testing.

It added that carcinogens in turnout gear remain a concern for departments across the continent.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The IAFF stated that the findings in Quincy show how carcinogens may still be present in gear marketed as safe.

The organisation said this emphasises the importance of independent testing of equipment.

It explained that fire departments should be aware of the timeline for NFPA 1970 implementation and the continued presence of PFAS in the market.

It added that professionals across the sector can use this information to inform procurement, policy, and training decisions.

Carcinogens found in Quincy firefighter gear: Summary

Independent testing confirmed the presence of carcinogens in new turnout gear purchased by Quincy, Massachusetts.

The International Association of Fire Fighters reported that the gear had been marketed as PFAS-free.

Quincy Mayor Thomas Koch criticised the findings.

IAFF General President Edward Kelly said fire fighters must conduct their own independent testing.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified some PFAS as carcinogenic.

Quincy’s Local 792 requested the analysis of newly purchased equipment.

Local 792 President Tom Bowes said manufacturers had failed to provide protection.

The IAFF reported that support came from Local 792, IAFF District leadership, and state representatives.

The IAFF stated that NFPA introduced Standard 1970 in October 2024.

The standard restricts PFAS and other hazardous substances in turnout gear.

The provisions take effect on 18 September 2025 with a sell-through period until 18 March 2026.

NFPA 1970 also includes updated UV Light Degradation testing.

The standard establishes voluntary labelling for gear tested with 100 ppm or less fluorine.

Kelly said carcinogen risks are a continent-wide issue.

The IAFF said the findings highlight the need for continued independent testing.

Fire services in England face £102m grant reduction

Government funding changes projected to cut fire service budgets

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has warned that fire and rescue authorities in England could face a real-terms funding cut of £102 million.

According to the NFCC, the reduction stems from Government proposals in the Spending Review and changes to the local government finance settlement.

Independent modelling commissioned by the organisation suggests that standalone fire and rescue authorities would lose the equivalent of around 1,500 wholetime firefighter posts over the next three years.

When London and county fire services are included, this number could rise to as many as 2,300 posts.

The NFCC said that council tax increases will not offset the anticipated cuts, especially when inflation and staff pay rises are taken into account.

NFCC concerns about service demand and workforce numbers

The NFCC explained that demand on fire and rescue services has grown while firefighter numbers have fallen sharply.

Data from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government shows that services in England responded to 600,185 incidents last year.

This represents an increase of 100,000 incidents, or 20 percent, compared to 2014.

At the same time, firefighter numbers have fallen by 25 percent since 2008, the equivalent of 11,000 wholetime firefighters.

The NFCC said this imbalance is placing pressure on already stretched services.

NFCC chair warns of community safety risks

NFCC Chair Phil Garrigan said: “I do recognise the Government has the unenviable task of balancing public finances and they face really tough choices when it comes to funding local services, but we have to confront how precarious a position fire and rescue finances are in right now.

“If I didn’t speak up, I would be letting down the fire and rescue service and, more importantly, the people we serve.

“I would also be letting the Government down as I would be allowing decisions to be made without highlighting the real and legitimate concerns we have – concerns for the public, and concerns for the safety of our firefighters who risk their lives every day.

“Fire and rescue services cannot continue to be expected to deliver more with less.

“We are already seeing demand rising, risks evolving, and our remit expanding – from tackling the effects of climate change to responding to increased blue light collaboration – all while firefighter numbers have fallen sharply.

“A failure to recognise these burdens and to forge ahead with the funding proposals as they stand would be incomprehensible.

“The safety of our communities depends on a funding settlement that matches the reality on the ground, and ensures we have the people, equipment and capability to protect the public.

“We can no longer just roll up our sleeves and get on with it, our silence will put lives at risk. We cannot allow our fire and rescue service to become the forgotten emergency service.”

Impact of the Fair Funding Review

The NFCC said that the upcoming Fair Funding Review 2.0 will determine how reduced central funds are distributed between fire and rescue authorities.

Under the proposed model, population size will be a key factor in calculating allocations.

The organisation explained that areas with faster population growth will receive a larger share of the reduced pot.

Areas with slower growth could face further reductions even if they contain higher levels of risk such as hazardous sites, high-rise housing, or areas of deprivation.

The NFCC stated that this redistribution approach risks destabilising services in many parts of England.

Local council tax increases unlikely to offset cuts

The NFCC noted that standalone fire and rescue authorities can raise their council tax precept by up to £5 per year for a band D property.

However, it added that this will not be enough to counterbalance funding reductions or meet inflation.

The organisation also explained that local political approval is required to apply these increases, meaning not all areas will secure the additional funds.

In some services, spending power could remain frozen or even fall in real terms despite the option to increase council tax.

The NFCC said this further exposes the reliance on central funding to maintain stable service levels.

NFCC calls for changes to funding approach

The NFCC has outlined a set of proposals it believes would protect the long-term resilience of fire and rescue services.

It is calling for funding to be protected in real terms, alongside uncapped council tax flexibility for all fire and rescue authorities.

The organisation also wants fire and rescue funding to be excluded from the Fair Funding Review until a risk-based formula is developed in consultation with the sector.

Other recommendations include a dedicated funding system similar to policing, recognising the national resilience role of fire and rescue services.

The NFCC is also calling for a full risk analysis before any funding formula changes are implemented.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The NFCC’s modelling and warnings are directly relevant to fire and safety professionals across the UK.

Funding decisions influence firefighter staffing levels, resource availability, equipment investment, and training capacity.

Professionals must understand how reductions in grant funding and reliance on council tax could affect operational readiness and long-term service resilience.

Awareness of these financial pressures is essential for anticipating changes to risk management and emergency response capacity in different regions.

NFCC highlights public safety risks from reduced funding: Summary

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has projected a £102 million real-terms cut to standalone fire and rescue authorities.

The modelling suggests this could equal the loss of 1,500 wholetime firefighter posts, rising to 2,300 when London and county services are included.

The NFCC said that council tax increases will not offset the cuts when inflation and staff pay are factored in.

Data shows fire and rescue services in England attended 600,185 incidents last year, an increase of 100,000 compared with 2014.

Firefighter numbers have fallen by 25 percent since 2008, equal to 11,000 wholetime posts.

The Fair Funding Review 2.0 will redistribute reduced funds based on population growth.

The NFCC said this could leave higher-risk areas with slower growth facing further funding reductions.

Local increases in council tax precepts are not guaranteed due to political approval requirements.

The NFCC is calling for funding protection, risk-based allocation, and a dedicated system similar to policing.

Chair Phil Garrigan warned that failure to act risks public safety and operational capacity.