Evacuation: Failure to prepare is preparing to fail

by Breaking NewsBuilding Management

Evac+Chair discusses the regulatory requirements and the critical role of proper evacuation strategies in compliance and safety

Established for over 40 years, Evac+Chair are the original manufacturer and global leader in the design and development of evacuation chairs.

Manufactured in the UK and supported by a team of experts, they are the perfect partner to support any organisation and their evacuation strategy.

Disaster can strike at any time without warning and being prepared to evacuate everyone, will save and protect lives.

Having an up-to-date evacuation plan, which has been tested and the correct evacuation equipment installed, will ensure everyone is evacuated effectively.

With 16 million disabled people living in the UK and more than 4.8 million in employment, additional measures must be considered and implemented in order to accommodate their needs.

An independent study ‘Risky Business’ conducted by Evac+Chair in 2023 with almost 500 SME business decision makers, concluded that: 1 in 10 businesses are either not prepared at all, or not sure they are prepared to evacuate disabled or mobility impaired members of staff.

This lack of unpreparedness is putting people lives at risk and those responsible are not complying with their legal obligations.

The legal landscape

It is a common misconception that the Fire Service are responsible for the evacuation of non-domestic premises.

As stipulated in the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, amended by The Fire Safety Act in 2021, it is the designated ‘responsible person’ (the person having control of the building, or a degree of control, like landlords and business owners) who are accountable.

The responsible person must ensure the appropriate measures are in place, so that everyone can be evacuated quickly and safely in an emergency.

In addition, the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 requires every employer “to protect all workers from the risk of injury or harm at work, so far as reasonably practicable.”

The Management of the Health & Safety Regulations 1999, require employers to make effective arrangements for safely evacuating all employees in an emergency.

Therefore, businesses must undertake regular assessments to identify any injury or illness risk and take the necessary action to eliminate or control that risk.

This includes ensuring evacuation plans have the appropriate equipment and trained staff, to support the mobility impaired during an evacuation.

Put simply, it is not enough for your building to just be accessible – you must ensure it can be exited safely by all occupants in an emergency.

It is no surprise that more than 68% of respondents to the Evac+Chair independent study think that fire safety legislation, does not go far enough.

Importance of PEEPs and GEEPs

Whilst fires are the most obvious need for an emergency evacuation the climate crisis is making flooding and extreme weather the norm, coupled with energy shortages, security breaches, terrorism and electrical faults, the likelihood of emergency evacuations is increasing.

Therefore, the need for being prepared is more prevalent than ever.

With evidence of individuals shying away from disclosing access concerns, and 4.8 million disabled people in employment, organisations must adopt a more inclusive approach.

A study by Samsung concluded, almost half (43%) of disabled people have avoided sharing information about their health or disability due to the perceived impact on their career, while 41% feel they will be judged and made to feel like an outsider.

Having an evacuation plan, which is tried and regularly tested, will ensure everyone is prepared for any eventuality, included in the plan should be a PEEP or a GEEP.

A PEEP (Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan) is tailormade to secure the safety of a specific person in the event of an emergency evacuation.

It must be devised with the individual, providing them with the opportunity to be transparent and clear about their needs, enabling a holistic and tailormade method of evacuation.

A GEEP (Generic Emergency Evacuation Plan) is a catch-all evacuation plan for buildings used by the public or places of work, with a transient workforce.

These are focused on visitors to a building who may face access barriers and may not be able to evacuate a building unaided.

Gerard Wallace, Managing Director at Evac+Chair International, says: “Evac+Chair understands the importance of emergency situations and fire assessments.

“It is essential that businesses have emergency evacuation plans in place alongside selected team members who have been trained to use vital emergency evacuation equipment, such as evacuation chairs, to aid the mobility impaired.”

Using the necessary equipment to evacuate buildings safely

When installing evacuation equipment, such as Evac+Chair’s, it is vital the requirements of the building and its personnel are considered.

Under the Equality Act 2010, a ‘disabled person’ is defined as someone with a physical or mental impairment, which has a ‘substantial’ and ‘long-term’ effect on their ability to do normal daily activities such as descending stairs unaided.

Independently tested by Greenwich University, an Evac+Chair was proven to be the safest and fastest means of evacuation.

There are a wide range of other evacuation solutions which include evacuation sheets and mats.

However, these are more suitable when evacuating from hospital and care homes.

All evacuation aids need to be stored in a designated refuge point within a building and is specified in the buildings’ fire strategy.

Each fire exit must accommodate the able-bodied and mobility-impaired therefore all equipment must be readily available and accessible.

Operating nationwide, Evac+Chair’s team of specialists can assess your building and personnel requirements and advise the most suitable Evac+Chair, its location and any supporting accessories.

This is a free no obligation service, that is recommended prior to purchase to ensure you have the correct evacuation equipment.

The purchase on an Evac+Chair is just the beginning of the journey to safe evacuation.

Evac+Chair offers training courses designed to instil confidence through interactive learning and practical hands-on training.

Providing delegates with the necessary skills to operate an Evac+Chair and therefore giving organisations the reassurance that in an emergency, everyone can be evacuated safely.

As a Class 1 Medical Device an Evac+Chair must be serviced on annual basis to ensure it remains fully operational throughout its lifetime, this requirement is included within the PUWER regulation (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations – UK only).

To help ensure you meet this obligation, Evac+Chair have a dedicated team, of service engineers and offer 1, 3 or 5 year contracts.

Working in partnership with their customers, Evac+Chair’s mission is to ensure all buildings and personnel are evacuation ready, providing a safer and more inclusive world.

This article was originally published in the March 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Law Society releases comprehensive guide on Building Safety Act for conveyancers

by Building ManagementFeatured NewsSafety

Understanding the Building Safety Act 2022 for conveyancers

The Law Society has published a detailed guide aimed at assisting conveyancers in navigating the complexities of the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022).

This guide is particularly designed for those dealing with residential leasehold conveyancing matters, focusing on transactions involving sellers, buyers, and lenders.

The BSA 2022, known for its complexity, introduces new challenges in residential leasehold transactions, necessitating a thorough understanding of the current legislation and its ongoing amendments.

Key aspects of the new conveyancing guide

The guide offers a broad overview of the BSA 2022, including who is responsible for the costs of remediation in tall buildings with fire safety issues, general criteria for handling BSA 2022 matters, and advice for advising sellers, buyers, and lenders.

It aims to provide conveyancers with high-level advice on handling cases related to the BSA 2022, without delving into the roles of landlords, developers, or contractors involved in external wall system installations.

Legislative changes and their impact on conveyancing

Since its introduction, the BSA 2022 has undergone several amendments to clarify the responsibilities and protect leaseholders from the financial burden of remediation costs.

Notably, the UK Finance Handbook has been updated to specify that its general requirements only apply to properties in a ‘relevant building’.

Additionally, changes have allowed leases enfranchised after 14 February 2022 to benefit from leaseholder protections.

These amendments, along with expected future legislative changes and the development of case law, are crucial for conveyancers to understand and apply in their practice.

Collaboration with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

The guide has been developed in collaboration with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC), featuring supplementary FAQs and illustrations to aid solicitors in practical scenarios.

This collaborative effort reflects the Law Society’s commitment to providing its members with relevant and practical resources in the ever-evolving landscape of building safety legislation.

IFSJ Comment

The introduction of the Building Safety Act 2022 guide by The Law Society is a timely resource for conveyancers, offering clarity and direction in a complex legal area.

This guide underscores the evolving nature of building safety legislation and the importance of staying informed about legal responsibilities and protections for leaseholders.

As the industry continues to navigate these changes, the guide serves as a valuable tool for professionals in ensuring informed decisions and legal compliance in conveyancing matters related to building safety.

Health and Safety Executive to host Building Safety Regulator Conference at NEC Birmingham

by Building ManagementConstructionEventsFeatured News

In a move to bolster engagement and understanding within the construction and building safety sectors, the Health and Safety Executive has announced an upcoming Building Safety Regulator Conference.

Scheduled for 21 May 2024 at the National Exhibition Centre (NEC) in Birmingham, the event is set to address key developments and practices following the introduction of the Building Safety Act.

A platform for frontline health and safety professionals

The conference aims to provide a direct line of communication between the regulator, industry professionals, and those impacted by recent legislative changes.

Attendees, including accountable and principal accountable persons, building control professionals, fire and rescue service personnel, and representatives from the construction and design industries, will have the opportunity to engage with the Building Safety Regulator.

Organisations involved with resident engagement are also encouraged to participate.

Free event to foster collaboration

Offered as a complimentary event, the conference underscores the regulator’s commitment to accessible education and collaboration across the sector.

This conference represents a crucial opportunity for professionals across the building safety spectrum to connect with the regulator and each other, fostering a collaborative approach to safety and compliance.

Anticipated outcomes and further details

The event is anticipated to facilitate a comprehensive dialogue on the practicalities of implementing the Building Safety Act, offering insights into compliance, best practices, and the future of building safety regulation.

Further information regarding the conference agenda and registration details will be made available next month, promising a well-structured platform for discussion and learning.

IFSJ Comment

The upcoming Building Safety Regulator Conference at the NEC in Birmingham is a timely and necessary initiative by the Health and Safety Executive.

As the industry navigates the complexities introduced by the Building Safety Act, opportunities for direct dialogue and learning are invaluable.

The inclusive nature of this free event ensures that a wide range of professionals, from fire and rescue service personnel to construction and design experts, can share knowledge and strategies for effective implementation.

Risk and responsibility: Navigating the UK’s legislative landscape around fire risk assessment

by Breaking NewsBuilding ManagementConstruction

Neil Triggs, Chief Operating Officer – Major Projects, Fire and Compliance at Inspectas Compliance, comments on the legislative landscape for UK fire safety and fire risk assessment

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (FSO) is the overarching legislation governing fire safety in buildings in England and Wales.

The FSO applies to all premises including workplaces and common parts of all multi-occupied residential buildings and places legal duties on anyone in control of these premises to undertake and record a fire risk assessment.

All businesses with five employees or more must produce a documented fire risk assessment to establish that all correct measures have been taken regarding fire prevention and detection.

The Fire Safety Act 2021 clarifies that external walls, flat entrance doors and the structure of buildings are all covered by the Fire Safety Order and must be accounted for in all fire risk assessments.

Meanwhile, the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and section 156 of the Building Safety Act have brought in additional duties for responsible persons under the Fire Safety Order.

The Building Safety Act 2022 was itself introduced as a response to the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017.

The act aims to improve the safety and accountability of buildings in the UK, focusing primarily on high-rise residential buildings.

It was also enacted to enhance building safety measures and mitigate risks associated with high-rise residential buildings.

It establishes a more rigorous regulatory framework to ensure that buildings are constructed, managed, and maintained to the highest safety standards.

In 2023, several updates were made, bringing significant changes which impact building owners and those involved in buying or selling property.

Fire risk assessment

Over the last 20 years, UK Fire Risk Assessment standards have evolved around PAS 79 (Fire Risk Assessment – guidance and a recommended methodology).

This is a “Publicly Available Specification” published by the British Standards Institution (BSI), which brought together a wide range of experts in fire safety, fire risk assessment and the housing sector to reach a consensus on the guidance and recommendations.

PAS 79 was first published in 2005, then subsequently revised in 2007 and 2012 to provide guidance and a recommended methodology for conducting fire risk assessments.

It quickly became a popular and well-used document.

As a result of public outcry and political lobbying post Grenfell, the PAS 79 fire risk assessment received a much-needed overhaul via the Fire Safety Act 2021, bringing about several directly effective changes attempting to deliver a higher level of fire safety compliance and for more stringent housing-centric recommendations to be implemented: the new legislation detailing specific recommendations for domestic dwellings is found in Part 2, known officially as PAS 79-2:2020.

As an all-encompassing code of practice, PAS 79:2020 provides a determinate methodology to conduct fire risk assessments, producing basic and qualitative findings particular to a location.

It is now a code of practice and not merely guidance.

The primary purpose of the revision was to provide a specific methodology for conducting fire risk assessments so those responsible could meet their legal responsibilities via a stringent framework.

It provides a transparent approach to fire risk assessment that fosters a better understanding of fire risks by fire safety experts and laypeople alike: promoting better communication and understanding of the risks.

In addition, PAS 79-1:2020 and PAS 79-2:2020 establish a satisfactory basis for the documentation of fire risk assessments; and provide a benchmark for a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment and define the nature and scope of a sufficient fire risk assessment.

Prioritising fire safety

Key aspects of the PAS 79-1:2020 (premises other than housing) and PAS 79-2:2020 (housing) are:

  • Greater importance placed on the competence of fire safety assessors.
  • PAS 79-2:2020 details recommendations of documents required for assessing and recording significant findings from risk assessments conducted at buildings of multiple-use – such as dual residential/retail premises – where parts of that building are legally required under legislation.
  • Recommendation for type 2, 3 and 4 fire risk assessments to be conducted for blocks of flats, extra-care premises and sheltered accommodation.
  • Recommendation of installation of evacuation alarm systems in blocks of flats and maisonettes – a direct result of the Grenfell Tower disaster.

Risk management

Nine steps to follow for a PAS 79:2020 fire risk assessment:

  1. Obtain information and all necessary data about the building: include processes that have been conducted within the structure, people who are present or likely to be present.
  2. Identify fire hazards and means for control and their elimination: determine scenarios or situations where fuel, heat and oxygen could mix on the assessed premise which would lead to fire – how could you eliminate, mitigate, or minimise said risks?
  3. Assess the likelihood of any fire: assess premises to determine where and which items are more likely to produce an environment friendly to ignition and fuel.
  4. Determine any present fire protection measures: all previously practicable fire detection/prevention/warning measures and systems.
  5. Obtain related info relating to fire safety management: what other steps have been or need to be implemented to guarantee risk of fire in the building is responsibly managed?
  6. Assess the most likely repercussions for a person if a fire occurs: consider the number of people, their age, overall health, bodily mobility, dependents, how familiar they are with the building layout, and likely regular visitors.
  7. Assess the overall risk of a fire occurring and severity of the damage caused by a fire that was the result of a fire hazard.
  8. Form and document an action plan: What is good about the premises’ current fire safety, what needs improvement and if your fire emergency evacuation plan (FEEP) is up to date.
  9. Set the fire risk assessment review date: book regularly and whenever there is a major change to the fire risk on the premises.

Common findings from PAS 79 Fire Risk Assessments include:

  • Damaged or unsuitable fire doors including missing intumescent smoke seals
  • Insufficient directional fire exit signage
  • Lack of documentation confirming that the fire systems including the fire alarm, fire suppression systems have been serviced
  • Failed emergency lighting luminaires
  • Housekeeping including excessive amounts of combustible materials
  • No fire door surveys or inspection’s
  • Fire evacuation drills not been carried out
  • Lack of or no specific fire safety awareness training for all staff
  • No trained fire marshals/wardens

Life safety fire risk assessment

BAFE is the independent registration body for Third Party Certificated fire safety organisations across the UK.

A ‘responsible person’ within a business who chooses an SP205 NSI approved/BAFE registered practitioner to carry out a risk assessment can be assured that they have contracted a suitably competent and qualified expert, therefore meeting their legal obligations.

NSI’s premier fire systems schemes are designed for companies who meet the industry’s highest technical standards and maintain a commitment to continual improvement with an ISO 9001 Quality Management System.

Conclusion

The legislative landscape for UK fire safety and fire risk assessments is complex and has expanded significantly in the last six years.

We are seeing projects take a much more holistic view to Fire Risk Assessments, particularly within the construction sector, something which is reflected through the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Work Stages, where Fire Statements, Fire Strategies, Site Audits and Fire Risk Assessments combine to demonstrate compliance with the Building Safety Act 2022, providing and ensuring a “Golden Thread” of information and best practice.

This legislative response to the Grenfell Tower fire sees Construction Phase Fire Risk Assessments produced while the development is still under construction and as early as RIBA Stage 4 and RIBA Stage 5.

In many circumstances, this will also include a bespoke External Wall Fire Risk Assessment (FRAEW) to PAS 9980 (developed through RIBA stages 5-7) and a practical completion Fire Risk Assessment.

These set a new benchmark for proactive risk assessment through the construction project and ensures developments are built in full recognition of Building Regulations and Fire Legislation.

A post occupational PAS 79 compliant FRA completes the process.

This article was originally published in the February 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Watco unveils new findings on the evolving facilities management industry

by Building ManagementFeatured News

Watco’s latest study sheds light on facilities management challenges

Watco, a leading industrial paint and repair products specialist in the UK, has conducted a study titled “Lifting the Lid”, which delves into the complexities of the facilities management (FM) industry.

This research explores how these complexities affect the safety and efficiency of modern facilities.

The study, surveying 250 senior FM professionals, found that 60% of facilities managers have seen their budgets cut by up to 25% over the past year, with an additional 20% experiencing reductions of 26-50%.

A significant finding from the research is that a third of respondents believe these budget cuts have compromised safety within their businesses.

Moreover, over a third (36%) reported that the use of materials handling equipment had led to accidents or near-misses, highlighting the tangible impact of budget constraints on workplace safety.

Additionally, slips, trips, and falls continue to be prevalent issues, with only a quarter of those surveyed stating their facilities were unaffected by these incidents in the last year.

Increased workloads and safety concerns among facilities managers

The report also points to other factors exacerbating safety issues, including a lack of employee awareness and insufficient time for repairs.

Around 40% of facilities managers struggle to find time for immediate repair jobs, and 36% frequently exceed their budgets to fix urgent hazards that could have been addressed earlier.

Compared to Watco’s 2022 survey, the recent findings indicate a notable increase in workload for nearly half (41%) of facilities managers, up from 29% the previous year.

This increase has led more than one in three to consider leaving their roles due to the stress associated with their workload.

Watco insights on addressing FM challenges

Scott Saunders, Technical Service Manager at Watco, reflecting on the data, stated: “Last year’s data highlighted the FM challenges with substantial amounts of time and money being lost. This year, we’ve dug even deeper into the impacts on today’s facility.”

He further explained how addressing one aspect of FM responsibilities can lead to multiple positive outcomes.

By adopting digital tools for hazard and damage reporting and coupling this with training for the facility team, the process of identifying and addressing safety hazards becomes more efficient.

This approach not only reduces the strain on FM teams but also promotes a culture of shared responsibility for safety and maintenance within the facility.

IFSJ Comment

The findings from Watco’s latest research underscore the pressing challenges faced by the facilities management industry, particularly in light of budget cuts and increasing workloads.

The study highlights the critical role of innovative solutions, such as digital tools and comprehensive training, in mitigating these issues.

By fostering a collaborative approach to facility maintenance and safety, organisations can enhance the well-being of their employees and ensure the smooth operation of their facilities.

This initiative by Watco is a step forward in understanding and addressing the evolving needs of the facilities management sector.

BESA encourages employers to embrace apprenticeships for industry growth

by Building ManagementFeatured NewsTraining

BESA calls on building services employers to leverage apprenticeships

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has issued a call to action for employers within the building services sector to fully utilise the opportunities presented by this year’s National Apprenticeship Week (NAW).

The aim is to rejuvenate their recruitment strategies and capitalise on the numerous advantages apprenticeships offer businesses.

The 17th NAW, which took place from 5 to 11 February, operated under the banner ‘Skills for Life’, emphasising the diverse range of apprenticeship opportunities available for individuals at any career stage and age.

This initiative arrives at a pivotal moment for the building engineering industry, which is currently grappling with an ageing workforce and a pronounced skills shortage.

BESA has underscored the urgency for employers to tap into government funding for apprenticeships to inject new talent into their ranks and enhance the skill set of their existing workforce.

In conjunction with NAW 2024, BESA has revitalised its ‘Future Skills’ pledge, encouraging all building services employers to demonstrate their dedication to training and recruitment.

By committing to the pledge, employers will assist BESA and its college affiliates in pinpointing and readying the necessary training resources to satisfy industry demand.

BESA commits to engaging with these employers to better understand their needs and to offer guidance on training providers, funding, and accessing suitable candidates.

Last year, over 60 employers made the pledge, and BESA aims to exceed that number in 2024.

Government and industry leaders show support for apprenticeships

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has unveiled plans for a £50 million initiative aimed at encouraging apprenticeship training within the engineering sector.

This announcement was made in his autumn statement, detailing a two-year ‘apprenticeship growth sector pilot’ designed to boost the number of aspiring engineers pursuing apprenticeships as a solution to the skills shortage.

Furthermore, from April, the minimum hourly wage for apprentices is set to increase by 21% to £6.40, up from £5.28, marking a significant step towards making apprenticeships more attractive to young individuals, especially considering the current cost-of-living crisis.

The critical role of apprenticeships in the building services industry

Helen Yeulet, BESA’s director of training and skills, has articulated the importance of apprenticeships, stating: “The cost-of-living crisis has made it even more likely that a young person looking for their next step after school will not go to university.

“The chance to ‘earn as you learn’ has never looked more appealing, and organisations like the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE) have worked hard to make apprenticeships more flexible to suit the needs of employers and employees at different stages of their careers.”

Yeulet also highlighted the necessity for employers to actively engage in taking on apprentices, noting that government funding covers up to 95% of an apprentice’s training and assessment costs.

This investment is immediately beneficial to businesses, as apprentices contribute directly to their operations.

Statistics from the Department for Education indicate that 80% of businesses that employ apprentices witness an increase in productivity, and 74% acknowledge that apprenticeships have enhanced the quality of their products or services.

The industry’s response to the call for apprenticeships

SES Engineering Services, a BESA member company, currently employs 98 apprentices across various levels and is planning to expand this number.

Steve Joyce, regional managing director, emphasised the value of apprentices in fostering a skilled and qualified workforce aligned with industry needs.

Shakira Green, a building services maintenance apprentice at Dalkia, shared her positive experience, stating: “My BSE apprenticeship allows me to work and learn simultaneously.

“It presents tasks and challenges you would never find in a classroom.”

IFSJ Comment

The Building Engineering Services Association‘s initiative to promote apprenticeships among employers in the building services sector is a commendable step towards addressing the dual challenges of an ageing workforce and a skills shortage.

By facilitating access to government funding and encouraging employers to pledge their commitment to training and recruitment, BESA is playing a vital role in ensuring the sustainable growth of the industry.

The endorsement from government figures and the tangible benefits experienced by companies and apprentices alike underscore the value of apprenticeships as a means of cultivating a skilled, dynamic, and innovative workforce capable of meeting the demands of the modern building services industry.

Building Safety Regulator offers flexibility in design approvals for high-rise blocks

by Building ManagementSafety

New approach to building control approvals unveiled

The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has introduced a nuanced stance on the approval process for designs of high-rise residential buildings, ahead of new regulations set to be implemented in April.

Under these forthcoming rules, the necessity for complete designs at the gateway two stage — a critical juncture replacing the current plan deposit phase — has been reassessed.

Neil Hope-Collins, the Operational Policy Lead for the Higher-Risk Building Control Authority at the BSR, during a webinar, clarified that not all aspects of a building’s design need to be finalised to gain approval.

He stated: “There will legitimately be parts of the design where it is not reasonable to expect the full detail at the outset.”

This adjustment aims to accommodate the evolving nature of building projects, acknowledging that certain details may only be finalised closer to construction due to changes in standards, contractors, or technology.

Industry reactions to the regulator’s clarification

The BSR’s updated guidance has elicited mixed responses from the construction and housing sectors.

Adam Hopkins, a Senior Technical Manager at Peabody, expressed surprise over the regulator’s stance, suggesting it might contrast with previous understandings within the industry.

“This appears to contrast with the past months and years, I’ve participated in and observed conversations between professionals where the debate is about how all this work will get completed before gateway two,” he said.

In contrast, Iain McIlwee, Chief Executive of the Finishes and Interiors Sector, viewed the comments as a potential dilution of regulatory standards, while Jon Pagan, Head of Technical at Kiwa, highlighted the ongoing issues regarding clarity within the new gateway process.

Nevertheless, Andrew Mellor, partner at architect PRP, welcomed the BSR’s approach, calling it “the only sensible approach and will be very welcomed by the industry.”

Building Safety Regulator maintains consistency in its messaging

Despite the varied industry feedback, a spokesperson for the BSR reiterated the regulator’s consistent position on allowing for design approvals with certain requirements.

The spokesperson clarified that the aim has always been to ensure designs, once constructed, comply with all relevant building regulations, even if some details are not finalised at the initial application stage.

“The consistent message from BSR has been that there should be sufficient detail for the regulator to be assured that if built the design will satisfy all applicable requirements of building regulations,” the spokesperson said.

This approach acknowledges the practicalities of design development, especially for projects classified as “higher-risk buildings,” which are at least 18m tall or comprise at least seven storeys with two residential units.

Competence steering group releases third report to enhance built environment safety

by Building ManagementConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

New report calls for adoption of competence-led practices in the built environment

A new report from the Competence Steering Group (CSG) is urging the industry to embrace new competence practices and measures to ensure a safer built environment.

Titled ‘A Higher Bar – Achieving a Competence-led Built Environment’, the report outlines significant advancements across the built environment and fire sectors in improving skills, knowledge, and behaviour.

This initiative follows the Grenfell Tower tragedy, with the aim to drive culture change and enhance building safety.

The CSG, formed five years ago by the Industry Response Group and led by Construction Industry Council (CIC) Chief Executive Graham Watts OBE, has been pivotal in this development.

Watts emphasised the progress: “We have laid the foundations of a new infrastructure for skills, knowledge, experience and behaviours.

“Coupled with strong legislation and enforcement, these new standards, frameworks and assessments, developed by industry for industry, should help move us to a higher level.”

Milestones and future plans of the competence steering group

The CSG’s third report not only reflects on past achievements but also outlines the next steps for implementing new competence requirements across the built environment workforce.

Key milestones include the development of a national suite of competence standards through BSI Flex 8670, PAS standards for regulated roles, and the establishment of the Building Safety Alliance.

Further steps include approval for new PAS Standards and the BSAS 01:2023 Organisation Capability Management System Standard.

Watts added: “There is still a long way to go. As we move into the implementation phase, it is incumbent on those working in all professions and trades in life-critical disciplines to attain these higher levels of competence.

!Only then can we rebuild the trust of those who occupy and live in the buildings we design, construct and manage.”

Leadership changes and future directions

The CSG is set to evolve into an independent sub-group of the Building Safety Regulator’s Industry Competence Committee, to be renamed as The Industry Competence Steering Committee (ICSG).

Hanna Clarke, Digital and Policy Manager at the Construction Products Association, will take over from Graham Watts as Chair, with Gill Hancock of the Association for Project Management as Deputy Chair.

Incoming Chair Clarke commented: “CSG broke ground in bringing so many siloed sectors together in unprecedented collaboration.

“ICSG’s task will be to build on this, increasing our engagement and visibility.”

She also noted the importance of the new relationship with the Industry Competence Committee and the Building Safety Regulator, aiming to establish a culture where every member of the supply chain demonstrates competence in working safely.

Jon Vanstone, Chair of the Industry Competence Committee, praised the report: “’A Higher Bar’ is a pivotal step in advancing building safety standards.

“It sets a new benchmark in competence for the construction industry, aligning with the critical directives of the Hackitt Review and the Building Safety Act.”

IFSJ Comment

The release of the third report by the Competence Steering Group marks a crucial juncture in the journey towards a safer built environment.

It represents a collective effort to enhance safety through a competence-led approach, a response to the urgent need for improved standards following the Grenfell Tower incident.

The initiatives and frameworks set forth by the CSG and the impending role of the ICSG under the Building Safety Regulator are indicative of a systemic shift towards higher safety standards in the construction industry.

As the industry moves forward, the emphasis on competence, collaboration, and continuous improvement will be essential in shaping a more responsible and safety-conscious built environment.

BSR unveils comprehensive enforcement policy for higher-risk buildings

by Building ManagementFeatured News

The Health and Safety Executive details new enforcement policy

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has recently detailed its Enforcement Policy Statement (EPS) for the newly established Building Safety Regulator (BSR), highlighting its regulatory functions and enforcement approach.

Published in December 2023, the EPS delineates the BSR’s enforcement methods, especially in situations involving non-compliance, hazards, or significant risks.

This development follows the BSR’s establishment as the building control authority for high-rise residential buildings, with a focus on a range of enforcement actions.

Enforcement actions and responsibilities outlined

The enforcement actions encompassed by the BSR include issuing written information on legal breaches, verbal warnings, demands for improvements in risk management, actions to rectify non-compliance, cessation of hazardous activities, recommendations and prosecutions for serious legal breaches, and the appointment of special measures managers for failing higher-risk buildings.

Additionally, the BSR’s role extends to regulating the building control profession, involving local authorities, registered building control approvers, and individual registered building inspectors.

The BSR’s powers include making disciplinary orders, varying or cancelling registrations, imposing financial penalties, prosecuting criminal offences, issuing improvement notices, and issuing serious contravention notices.

Building Safety Act 2022 and its implications

The Building Safety Act 2022, effective from October 2023, introduced a more stringent regulatory regime for buildings classified as ‘higher-risk’, typically those at least 18 metres or seven storeys high containing two or more residential units.

The Act’s passage followed recommendations from Dame Judith Hackitt’s 2018 ‘Building a Safer Future’ report, commissioned in response to the Grenfell Tower fire.

The BSR, a part of the HSE, will oversee safety standards across all buildings, focusing on higher-risk structures to promote industry competence in building design, construction, and management.

New offences and powers under the act

The Act introduces several new criminal offences, such as obstructing or impersonating a BSR officer, providing false information, failing to register higher-risk buildings, and allowing occupation without a completion certificate.

It empowers the BSR to issue compliance and stop notices during the design and construction phase of higher-risk buildings to address non-compliance.

These measures aim to prevent dangerous work from continuing, with failure to comply constituting a criminal offence.

The overarching goal is to ensure compliance with the Act, drive positive industry change, and elevate building safety as a primary concern.

IFSJ Comment

The introduction of the new enforcement policy by the Building Safety Regulator marks a pivotal shift in the UK’s approach to building safety.

The comprehensive nature of the enforcement actions and the introduction of new offences under the Building Safety Act 2022 signify a rigorous and proactive stance towards ensuring higher safety standards in building construction and management.

This policy is likely to have far-reaching implications for the building industry, necessitating heightened compliance and accountability.

As the policy takes effect, it will be crucial for industry professionals and stakeholders to adapt to these new regulations to ensure the safety and well-being of residents and the broader community.

Understanding the role of the Principal Designer in the Building Safety Act

by Building ManagementFeatured News

The introduction of the principal designer role

The recent modifications to the Building Safety Act have introduced significant changes to the role of architects in the UK construction industry.

As per a recent article published by RIBA, Paul Jolly, Technical Director at HKA, analyses the evolving role of architects as Principal Designers under the new regulatory regime​​.

This change is pivotal, given the government’s intention to implement the Building Safety Act 2022, mandating the appointment of two principal duty holders – the Principal Designer and the Principal Contractor – for projects requiring a new Building Regulations application​​.

Key differences in duties

The role of the Principal Designer has evolved from the earlier Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015.

Under CDM, the Principal Designer’s primary duty was to manage the pre-construction phase with a focus on health and safety.

The Building Regulations now require the Principal Designer to oversee the design work during the design phase, ensuring compliance with all relevant requirements, from structural integrity to fire safety​​.

This change is in line with Dame Judith Hackitt’s recommendations for stronger accountability in the construction industry​​.

Increasing responsibilities and opportunities

The RIBA considers this regulatory change as an opportunity for architects to reassert control over the design phase.

However, there’s a concern whether architects are prepared to assume these added responsibilities.

Historical trends show limited uptake of similar roles by architects, with a recent HSE research report indicating only 18% of RIBA members taking up the CDM Principal Designer role​​.

Legal and operational implications

The government’s stance is to have both Principal Designer roles under CDM and Building Regulations performed by the same entity to avoid confusion.

Architects must be fully aware of their duties and wider obligations before accepting these roles​​.

Furthermore, larger, multi-disciplinary firms may find it more viable to undertake complex projects due to their broad spectrum of in-house specialist design knowledge​​.

Insurance and professional standards

The current market conditions pose significant challenges in obtaining appropriate professional indemnity insurance cover.

The government’s amendments require designers to take ‘all reasonable steps’ for compliance, a softer stance than the initially proposed strict liabilities​​.

To support architects, the RIBA has launched a Principal Designer Register, encouraging faster uptake of these roles by architects​​.

Related industry perspectives

Additional insights from the Project Safety Journal reveal the expected structure of duty holders under the new regulations, emphasising the importance of the Principal Designer in managing the design phase and ensuring compliance with the Building Regulations​​.

The competencies required for this role include a deep understanding of the legislative framework, management of design work compliance, and critical assessment skills to ensure the success of design work​​.

IFSJ Comment

The introduction of the Principal Designer role under the Building Safety Act marks a significant shift in the UK construction industry’s approach to building safety and compliance.

It represents a strategic move to centralise responsibility and enhance accountability in design and construction processes.

The role’s focus on compliance, collaboration, and competence underscores a systemic change, aiming for higher standards in building safety.

This development holds potential for architects to reassert their pivotal role in the construction process, but also presents challenges in terms of readiness and adaptation to new responsibilities.

The industry’s response to these changes will be crucial in shaping the future of building safety in the UK.

About the Building Safety Act

The Building Safety Act 2022 is a comprehensive piece of legislation in the UK that aims to improve building safety standards, particularly following the Grenfell Tower tragedy.

It introduces new regulatory frameworks and roles, such as the Principal Designer, to ensure greater accountability and safety in building design and construction.

The Act represents a significant overhaul of building safety regulations, reflecting the government’s commitment to preventing future building safety failures.