AXA UK introduces body cameras to monitor building remediation works

by ConstructionFeatured News

AXA UK has started providing body cameras to contractors involved in removing hazardous cladding and insulation from various buildings.

This initiative aims to ensure better monitoring and record-keeping of the essential safety works being conducted, a response to the dire need for improved fire safety in multi-occupancy buildings.

Enhancing safety and transparency in building remediation

The tragedy of Grenfell Tower in 2017, which brought to light the dangers of flammable cladding, has necessitated the remediation of numerous properties across the UK.

AXA UK’s decision to equip contractors with body cameras serves multiple purposes.

Firstly, it allows for the detailed recording of the materials and workmanship involved in the remediation process.

This is crucial for underwriters to accurately assess and price risks associated with these buildings.

Secondly, it addresses the significant challenge of maintaining records of materials used in the construction of multi-occupancy buildings, a problem highlighted by the Grenfell incident.

Previously, the absence of such records made it challenging to identify at-risk buildings and the required replacement materials.

Advanced technology for better risk assessment

The body cameras, specifically Motorola Solutions VT100 models, are equipped with features that enable live streaming, allowing for direct communication with AXA risk engineers if necessary.

All footage is securely stored in the cloud, ensuring the integrity and non-tamperability of the recorded material.

This technology, trusted by emergency services and law enforcement organisations globally, allows workers to record without interrupting their work.

A proactive approach to customer protection and premium management

AXA UK’s initiative also extends to safeguarding its customers by ensuring that remediation work adheres to required standards and uses appropriate materials.

The visual evidence from the body cameras also provides insights into the installation of protection systems like sprinklers and alarms.

The end goal is to make remediated buildings less risky, positively impacting policy premiums.

AXA UK has committed to reducing premiums for buildings that have been renovated, reflecting the reduced risk post-remediation.

IFSJ Comment

AXA UK’s integration of body cameras in building remediation projects is a significant step towards enhancing building safety standards.

This initiative not only ensures more accurate risk assessment and transparent monitoring of remediation work but also demonstrates a proactive approach in addressing a critical issue highlighted by the Grenfell Tower tragedy.

By leveraging advanced technology, AXA UK is setting a precedent in the insurance industry for using innovative solutions to manage and mitigate risks associated with building construction and maintenance.

This move could potentially inspire other insurers and stakeholders in the construction and property management sectors to adopt similar measures, contributing to overall improvements in building safety standards and practices.

UK housing faces urgent structural safety concerns, warns government advisory group

by ConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

Alarming findings from structural safety group

A recent leaked report by the Structural Stability Working Group (SSWG), appointed by the government, has revealed significant structural safety risks within the UK housing industry.

The report, initially obtained by Inside Housing, highlights several critical issues threatening the integrity of residential and public buildings​​.

Key safety concerns identified

During their first meeting in December 2021, the SSWG, comprising industry experts, identified major risks, including:

  • Ageing Large-Panel System (LPS) Buildings: Concerns were raised about older LPS buildings lacking adequate strengthening.
  • Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC): The use of RAAC in construction was flagged as a concern.
  • Addition of Floors (Airspace Developments): Adding floors to existing buildings was seen as a potential risk.
  • Steel and Timber Frame Construction: This construction method for medium and high-rise buildings was considered worrisome.
  • Cladding Materials: Certain cladding materials, such as brick slips, were noted for their risk of falling and causing injury​​.

Market prioritising profit over safety

The minutes from the SSWG’s meeting emphasised the experts’ dissatisfaction with the market’s approach, accusing it of prioritising profit over safety.

Many structural defects remain hidden, and there is a need for a better understanding of the problem’s scale​​.

Reference to Ronan Point collapse

The report highlighted the structural integrity of LPS buildings, referencing the Ronan Point collapse in 1968.

It noted that many LPS buildings intended for remedial work had not been adequately strengthened.

The SSWG suggested a national-level assessment for these buildings and standardised risk mitigation measures​​.

Bristol Council’s proactive response

Following these revelations, Bristol Council evacuated 400 residents from a tower block due to fire and structural safety risks associated with LPS construction.

A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that the building had not been strengthened since the 1970s​​.

Concerns about structural engineers’ competency

The SSWG expressed concerns over the competency of structural engineers, noting that some who failed professional exams were still practising.

The group suggested a 10-year programme to educate more structural engineers, given the complexity of assessing existing buildings​​.

Industry response

A safety manager at a social landlord with several LPS buildings told Inside Housing: “Our LPS buildings are 60 years old, and they’ve never had any kind of structural scrutiny.”

While their organisation takes this issue seriously, it is not the case everywhere.

The manager fears that structural safety could become the next crisis due to its historical neglect​​.

Government’s commitment to building safety

In response to these concerns, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities emphasised its commitment to building safety through the Building Safety Act and the new Building Safety Regulator.

This body is tasked with monitoring structural and fire risks and ensuring higher safety standards in all UK buildings​​​​.

IFSJ Comment

The revelations from the Structural Stability Working Group present a renewed wake-up call for the UK housing industry.

The highlighted risks, from ageing LPS buildings to questionable construction practices, underscore the need for comprehensive measures to ensure structural safety.

The government’s response, including the Building Safety Act and the new Building Safety Regulator, is a step in the right direction, however, this situation seems to highlight a broader issue within the industry, where economic incentives often overshadow safety considerations.

The industry’s call for buildings to be made safe for residents as a non-negotiable priority, requiring ongoing vigilance, regulatory oversight, and a cultural shift towards valuing safety over profit is notable.

This development is significant not just for its immediate implications but also for its potential to catalyse much-needed reforms in building safety standards and practices across the UK.

Camden Council homes lead in fire safety with national Building Safety Fund cladding replacement

by ConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

Camden Council’s proactive approach to fire safety

Camden Council has marked a significant stride in fire safety by being among the first in the country to complete fire safety improvements using the national Building Safety Fund.

This initiative, focused on the Cromer Street Estate in King’s Cross, represents a pioneering step in enhancing fire safety standards for social homes in the UK.

£7 million investment for safer homes

The council invested £7 million in replacing the façades of the Bramber, Glynde Reach, and Gatesden buildings with A1 rated cladding.

This investment, part of the larger £200 million commitment to safety improvements across its housing stock, has been essential in addressing fire safety concerns.

Improving aesthetics and insulation alongside safety

In addition to fire safety, the new cladding has significantly improved the exterior appearance of the buildings and the quality of insulation, aiding in temperature regulation and potentially reducing energy costs for residents.

Resident engagement in the safety process

A key aspect of this project was the active engagement of local residents.

Regular interactions with council officers and contractors, coupled with a dedicated team for resident queries, underscored a commitment to transparency and collaboration in enhancing safety.

Comprehensive fire safety measures by Camden Council

Since 2017, Camden Council has been dedicated to achieving the highest standard of safety.

This commitment is evident in their comprehensive programme of fire safety works, including the installation of appropriate fire doors, emergency lighting, fire alarms, and regular fire risk assessments in over 3,200 buildings.

Cladding replacement: Government support through Building Safety Fund

The national Building Safety Fund, launched by the UK government in May 2020, has provided significant support in this endeavour.

With a total funding of £1.6 billion, it aims to meet the costs for remediation of unsafe non-ACM cladding systems on residential buildings over 18 metres tall.

This fund targets both the private and social sectors, ensuring that building safety improvements continue even during challenging times like the coronavirus pandemic.

A history of responsiveness to fire safety

The need for such comprehensive measures stems from past incidents, such as the tragic death of Magdalena Fink in 2017 due to a fire in Camden.

This incident highlighted the importance of proper fire risk assessments and the urgent need for safety improvements in buildings.

Since then, Camden Council has significantly increased its engagement with the London Fire Brigade and has strengthened its fire safety team, demonstrating a clear commitment to resident safety.

IFSJ Comment

Camden Council’s initiative to replace cladding in council homes using the national Building Safety Fund is a significant development in fire safety.

The council’s proactive and collaborative approach, engaging with residents and investing substantially in safety improvements, sets a commendable standard for other councils.

The tragedy in 2017 was a stark reminder of the consequences of neglecting fire safety.

However, Camden’s response, marked by substantial investments and a comprehensive safety programme, illustrates a dedicated effort to prevent such incidents.

This story is not just about cladding replacement; it reflects a broader commitment to ensuring the safety and wellbeing of residents, highlighting the critical role of local authorities in fire safety management.

FPA develops new assessment method for fire safety of external cladding

by Associations and OrganisationsConstructionFeatured News

The Fire Protection Association (FPA) has introduced a new fire test and assessment method for external cladding systems named RISC 501.

This method comes in response to the rising incidences of large cladding system fires since 1990 and aims to enhance the resilience and safety of buildings by addressing certain limitations found in the current compliance routes.

Evaluating external cladding fire performance

RISC 501 evaluates the fire safety performance of non-loadbearing external cladding systems by implementing more stringent construction and performance criteria.

The method aims to exceed the basic life safety standards and offers a more accurate representation of real building conditions, emphasizing the importance of preventing the vertical spread of fire.

This new method can be used alongside BS 8414 or as a standalone assessment to confer compliance and offer increased protection for both life safety and property.

George Edwardes, Technical Director of the FPA, shed light on the development of this new method: “There have been concerns around large scale cladding testing ever since its inception in the UK.

“Conducting a thorough research project from an insurer’s perspective identified the areas that need improving and resulted in the development of a robust test method that reflects the built environment; a method that is appropriate for not just the minimum life safety requirement, but also for property protection.

“I look forward to working with industry to conduct RISC 501 testing, which will help ensure people have homes to return to after the unfortunate event of a fire.

“The FPA is continuously seeking ways to improve building resilience and we actively welcome collaboration for future research.”

RISC 501 testing available for cladding systems

The RISC 501 testing method sets out a range of rigorous criteria for assessing cladding systems.

These include stricter construction and temperature conditions, mechanical performance, gas sampling for smoke toxicity, and material fingerprinting.

It also stipulates that all test results should be published, enhancing transparency and accountability in cladding system safety.

Chris Miles, Commercial Director at the FPA, supports the new method with confidence: “RISC 501 offers significant improvements when compared with the current performance-based route to compliance.

“It also enables a route for stronger third party product and system certification, for which there is great need in the UK at present.

“We are pleased to now have test methodology available to support industry in evidencing robustness for the fire safety of cladding systems which is now more important than ever.”

The FPA is promoting understanding of RISC 501 through a webinar scheduled for 22 November, featuring George Edwardes.

Additionally, the latest episode of the FPA’s Assembly Point podcast includes a detailed discussion on RISC 501, featuring George Edwardes and Andy Miller of Allianz.

IFSJ Comment

The development of RISC 501 by the FPA marks a pivotal advance in the field of fire safety for external cladding systems.

With the complexities involved in cladding fires and the potential they have to escalate quickly, a comprehensive assessment method like RISC 501 could revolutionise the industry standards for cladding safety.

It represents a much-needed shift towards greater accountability and transparency in fire safety testing, a change that resonates with the insurance sector’s push for more rigorous safeguards.

By incorporating detailed parameters for testing and public reporting, RISC 501 ensures that the results reflect real-world building scenarios, which is essential for informed decision-making in building and property insurance, as well as for public safety.

IFE authorised as licensee for higher-risk building registration standard

by Associations and OrganisationsBuilding ManagementConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

The Institution of Fire Engineers becomes a pioneer in fire safety

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) has marked a significant milestone by becoming the first licensee authorised for the Fire Engineering Discipline Annex of the new UK-SPEC Higher-Risk Building (HRB) registration standard

The licensing aligns with the Engineering Council’s UK-SPEC HRB Fire Engineering Discipline Annex, set to launch early next year, aiming to elevate safety and competence within the built environment industry.

This development arrives as a strategic progression following the Building Safety Act 2022, catalysed by several key industry reports and collaborations after Dame Judith Hackitt’s comprehensive study.

Raising standards in building safety

The new standard is instrumental for professionals engaged in high-risk building work, including design, construction, maintenance, and operations, ensuring they meet the necessary competencies and commitments.

Addressing the necessity of context-specific standards for all building professions, it emphasises fire safety, structural integrity, and public health.

IFE’s chief executive officer, Steve Hamm, commented on the advancement: “I’m so pleased to witness the IFE become the first Licensee to register individuals against the Fire Engineering Annex of our new UK-SPEC HRB Standard.

“Many will know that the IFE is steadfast in its endeavours to drive professional competency and this is another step on the ladder to a safer future across the built environment.”

First wave of higher-risk building registration underway

With the IFE’s strong global presence, encompassing around 12,000 fire professionals, the institution is keen to demonstrate its committee’s proficiency in the UK SPEC HRB Fire Engineering Annex.

As the training of the committee concludes, the IFE is looking to offer this registration to a broader segment of professionals.

The first group of applicants is currently in the process of completing their submissions for the upcoming registration phase.

Echoing the sentiment of progress, Paul Bailey, CEO of the Engineering Council, said: “We’re delighted that IFE has become the first Licensee authorised to register individuals against the Fire Engineering Annex of our new UK-SPEC HRB Standard.

“This is an important step in the fire sector, and the engineering industry more widely.

“Assuring the public that those engineers and technicians working on higher-risk buildings have the requisite competences and commitment was a crucial outcome of Dame Judith Hackitt’s ‘Building a Safer Future’ report and subsequent Building Safety Act 2022, and we’re delighted to be working with the IFE on this important activity.”

Details about the registration process are expected to be made available next year. The IFE has promised to keep stakeholders informed through their communication channels.

IFSJ Comment

The recent development involving the IFE obtaining the first HRB registration license represents a pivotal shift towards enhanced safety and proficiency within the fire engineering discipline.

By establishing a standard that engineers and technicians must meet to work on higher-risk buildings, the industry is taking concrete steps to ensure that the skills and knowledge of these professionals are verifiable and current.

The move will not only improve industry practices but also build public trust in the safety measures employed in high-risk environments.

The foresight demonstrated by the IFE in adopting and promoting these standards sets a precedent for other institutions, reinforcing the commitment to upholding public welfare and safety as paramount concerns.

Scotland introduces Cladding Remediation Bill to address unsafe cladding

by ConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

Scotland has taken a legislative step forward with the publication of the Cladding Remediation Bill.

The Bill, aimed at tackling the issue of unsafe cladding on buildings, is set to empower Scottish Ministers with the authority to assess and enforce remediation work, even in cases where owner consent is not achievable.

The Cladding Remediation Bill enhances safety measures

The Housing (Cladding Remediation) Bill, as recently published, introduces new measures to ensure the safety of residents in buildings with unsafe cladding.

This legislation allows the Scottish Government to enforce assessment and remediation of at-risk buildings and establish a Cladding Assurance Register.

This register is designed to bolster resident confidence by documenting the assessments and remediation works carried out on their buildings.

A step towards responsible development

Under the Bill, there is also a provision for the establishment of a Responsible Developers Scheme.

This initiative encourages developers to engage with the remediation process proactively, with an agreement to cover the associated costs being a likely component of the scheme.

Sanctions are on the horizon for those developers who qualify for the scheme but choose not to participate or maintain their membership.

Housing Minister Paul McLennan elaborated on the Bill’s objectives: “We are determined to safeguard people living in buildings with unsafe cladding which has been identified through the cladding remediation programme.

“Where work is required, it should be carried out swiftly and this Bill will allow us to build on progress to date by addressing barriers to assessment and remediation work.”

“The public commitments that have already been made by many of Scotland’s developers to identify, assess and remediate their buildings mean that public money can be focused on buildings without a linked developer.”

“The opportunity for future creation of a Responsible Developers Scheme – through secondary legislation – would recognise those developers who are doing the right thing and protect the reputation of responsible operators.”

The Bill, which was introduced on the 1st of November 2023, serves as a mechanism to mitigate the risks posed by unsafe cladding, thereby potentially saving lives.

IFSJ Comment

The unveiling of the Cladding Remediation Bill in Scotland marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing effort to address the critical issue of building safety.

The implications of this legislation are far-reaching, impacting not only residents and property owners but also setting a precedent for the construction industry.

The introduction of the Responsible Developers Scheme signals a shift towards a culture of accountability, where developers are not only encouraged but expected to take responsibility for the safety of their constructions.

The Bill’s passage would be a testament to the government’s commitment to prioritising the welfare of its citizens and leading by example in the rectification of past oversights in building safety.

Surrey home withstands fire test with class 1 Magply boards

by ConstructionFeatured NewsPassiveProjects

A fire in Surrey could have been disastrous for a million-pound house had it not been for the installation of Magply boards, which provided a crucial barrier against the flames.

The incident, which saw a blaze engulf a garage in August, tested the fire-resistant properties of the building material when a parked vehicle inside the garage went up in flames.

Magply boards prove effective in real-life fire test scenario

The house, constructed using a Structurally Insulated Panel (SIP) system, utilised Magply as the exterior substrate panel for its render system.

Despite the intensity of the fire, which devastated the garage, the main house sustained only surface damage thanks to the Magply boards.

Glosford SIPs confirmed the effectiveness of Magply after examining core samples post-fire to assure the integrity of the SIPs structure beneath the boards.

James Corlett, the Contracts Manager for Fullers Plastering, stated: “The fire-resistant qualities of the Magply boards saved the day.”

He further added: “We had utilized Magply as a render-backer on a number of projects before being awarded the contract to apply K-Rend to the half dozen homes here and have always been very pleased with the performance.”

The homeowner expressed satisfaction with the performance of Magply boards during the fire, noting that the K-Rend faced the heat head-on and would be replaced as a precaution.

They said: “The Magply boards stood up extremely well: although the K-Rend which took the full brunt of the heat cannot be easily removed.”

The homeowner is looking forward to repairs, which are expected to take approximately eight weeks, contingent upon the delivery of new windows.

The benefits of using Magply boards highlighted

Fullers Plastering, a Brighton-based company, often chooses Magply for its projects, backed by their practical experience with the material in various applications.

The company’s decision to consult with John Malone, National Sales Manager at IPP Magply, before beginning construction has shown its merit through the real-life performance of Magply in the Surrey fire incident.

Magply’s product is continually subjected to tests to meet stringent safety standards, which includes BBA certification and assessments by top UK testing houses.

Although the brand never wishes for its products to be tested by real-life fires, they acknowledge the board’s capability to perform under such conditions.

For detailed information about Magply and its uses, visit Magply.

IFSJ Comment

In the ever-evolving landscape of fire safety and prevention, the effectiveness of fire-resistant materials in real-life situations is invaluable.

The incident in Surrey presents a case for the effectiveness of Magply boards. The fact that the Magply boards were able to protect the SIPs construction under intense heat exemplifies their reliability and potential to ensure building integrity during a fire.

Such real-world validations of product efficacy are crucial for the industry, offering a significant learning curve for fire safety professionals.

They also set a precedent for future construction practices and material selection, influencing the building codes and standards that safeguard residential and commercial properties.

About Magply

Magply manufactures a multi-use, A1 non-combustible board widely used in the construction industry.

Their product portfolio spans applications in offsite and timber frame sectors, high-rise cladding systems, and interior fit-outs for modular constructions.

Magply boards are known for their fire resistance and are certified by various fire safety tests to ensure compliance with rigorous fire safety standards.

With a commitment to continuous testing and improvement, Magply ensures that their boards meet the needs of current building regulations and client expectations.

Explore construction’s burning issues at London Build Expo

by Breaking NewsConstructionEvents

London Build, The UK’s Premier Construction Show, returns this month

As fire and safety professionals understand, any discussion on construction is incomplete without addressing the pivotal role of fire safety.

London Build 2023 recognises this imperative, putting fire safety at the forefront of the construction and design conversation.

Set to return to Olympia London on November 15th and 16th, this year’s edition promises not just a comprehensive showcase of construction marvels but also a deep dive into the latest advancements in fire safety protocols and technologies.

London Build Event overview

While London Build caters to the entire spectrum of the construction industry, the 2023 edition holds special significance for fire and safety professionals.

Including a dedicated fire safety stage which will serve as a platform where experts, innovators, and industry leaders converge to discuss the latest trends, challenges, and solutions in fire safety within construction.

Expect a series of technical sessions, panel discussions, and live demos that will explore cutting-edge technologies, regulatory landscapes, and best practices.

Networking opportunities at London Build

London Build 2023 is poised to be a networking nexus for fire safety professionals.

At its core, the event introduces Specialised Networking Zones.

Crafted specifically for fire safety enthusiasts, these zones facilitate discussions and collaborations for both seasoned professionals and industry newcomers.

The highlight is the ‘Ingite and Connect – Fire Safety Networking’ event.

Managed by the Fire Industry Association, it offers a platform for vibrant conversations and the exchange of insights.

It’s not just about chats; it’s about fostering potential collaborations.

Adding depth are the Interactive Roundtables.

More than mere discussion spaces, they function as think tanks, addressing urgent fire safety challenges and potentially birthing innovations.

For suppliers and partners, the Meet the Buyer Events are invaluable.

These provide opportunities to liaise with potential buyers and major exhibitors, presenting a chance for significant business ties.

There will also be collaborative sessions with industry giants, such as the Chartered Institute of Building, ensure that fire safety dialogues are harmoniously woven into broader construction narratives.

Exhibition highlights at London Build

London Build 2023 promises an unparalleled exhibition journey, especially tailored for fire safety professionals.

The event’s centrepiece is a dedicated fire safety stage.

This isn’t just a stage—it’s a convergence point where innovations, products, and industry best practices come alive.

Here, attendees can expect an in-depth look into the most recent advancements and a chance to hear from the sector’s leading experts.

Additionally, with over 350 exhibitors, the breadth of the exhibition is undeniable.

Professionals will encounter a vast array of products and services, ranging from the most avant-garde fire-resistant materials to groundbreaking fire safety technologies.

Notably, the meet the buyer events are set to be a landmark feature.

This is where potential partnerships can be forged, especially with the confirmed participation of industry titans like Balfour Beatty Highways, Costain UK, and Laing O’Rourke.

Gor those keen on a more tactile understanding of the newest innovations, the interactive displays offer an immersive experience, giving attendees a tangible sense of the future of fire safety.

While London Build 2023 stands tall as a foremost professional event, it also ensures attendees have a well-rounded experience that extends beyond the realm of business.

The event fuses the serious with the delightful.

As the day progresses, attendees can lose themselves in an entertainment extravaganza, filled with live music and captivating performances.

For those looking for a dash of nostalgia, the retro revelry promises a trip back to the ’90s, allowing participants to relive the charm of a bygone era.

After absorbing the day’s insights, the speak-easy provides a serene retreat—a space curated for relaxation, reflection, and rejuvenation.

And to ensure the event remains etched in memory, London Build 2023 will pepper the experience with exclusive giveaways, adding that touch of unexpected joy.

Day one highlights at London Build

Day one of London Build 2023 promises an encompassing exploration of the construction and design world.

Morning sessions starting at 10:00 with a focus on sustainability and design.

As the construction industry faces an increasing need for sustainable practices, discussions around sustainable tall buildings, the imperative to digitise for decarbonisation, and envisioning the future of skyscrapers stand out.

In parallel, the significance of creating inclusive spaces is underscored with dedicated sessions on designing buildings that are accessible and universal.

Fire safety, always a paramount concern, also gets its spotlight with a detailed session on the latest strategies tailored for high-rise buildings.

Amidst these academic discussions, networking and industry collaborations find their place, with events like the London Constructing Excellence Club Breakfast and the CIOB London Construction Social offering attendees unique opportunities to mingle and form meaningful connections.

The mid-day sessions from 12:00 onwards see technological innovation takes center stage.

The transformative power of AI in revolutionising construction and the paradigm shift towards smart buildings are among the key highlights.

The agenda also brings into focus the broader societal impact and responsibilities of the construction industry.

An exclusive segment for fire safety professionals, the ‘Ignite and Connect: Fire Safety Networking Event’ at 11:45, offers a dedicated platform for interaction and knowledge exchange.

The afternoon has a marked emphasis on diversity and inclusion in the construction landscape, delving into topics such as gender diversity in the sector and the increasing opportunities for women.

As always, safety remains at the forefront, with comprehensive sessions on passive fire protection principles and the diverse applications of water mist fire protection.

Several future-focused sessions will also provide insights into upcoming trends, from timber buildings to visionary strategies for sustainable construction.

Day two highlights at London Build

On the second day of London Build 2023 the theme of sustainable progress interwoven with societal responsibility takes the limelight.

Kicking off at 10:00, the discussions will venture into the pathways towards a net-zero future, a topic that’s crucial in the contemporary global scenario.

Attendees will gain insights into the outcomes of the COP28, learn about the influence of digital twins in driving sustainability, and be introduced to ways in which the construction world is contributing to creating carbon-neutral cities.

With digital technology revolutionising numerous sectors, its impact on fire safety and its transformative role in the industry is explored.

An intriguing workshop on ChatGPT and its applications in the workplace further underscores the importance of digital technology in today’s evolving work landscape.

In other sessions, the importance of sustainable design is emphasised by industry leaders, while the challenges in bridging the digital skills gap provide food for thought.

As inclusivity remains at the heart of modern workplaces, sessions on neurodiversity and empowering disabled talent in the construction sector draw attention to the diverse spectrum of human potential.

Mental health, a topic of paramount importance, is brought to the forefront with workshops centred on its destigmatisation and its significance in the construction domain.

The afternoon of Day Two sees an expansive exploration of design principles, technology, and inclusivity.

Meanwhile, sessions on redefining fire safety and fostering inclusive cultures in architecture cater to both the functional and moral responsibilities of the industry.

Concluding the day, discussions on smart cities driven by data, the construction industry’s role in the circular economy, and the importance of supporting prison leavers highlight the multifaceted nature of the industry.

Workshops on digital marketing strategies and sustainable interior design reflect the blend of tradition and modernity in today’s construction world.

Why you should attend London Build

In an era where construction intricacies have rapidly evolved, the event’s focus on integrating fire safety proves both timely and essential.

The dedicated fire safety stage, designed as a hub for leading expertise and pioneering innovations, stands as a testament to the event’s commitment to advancing the dialogue around fire safety.

The promise of in-depth technical sessions, coupled with the interplay of expert panel discussions and live demonstrations, offers attendees an unparalleled opportunity to immerse in the latest fire safety nuances within the construction domain.

For any fire and safety professional, London Build 2023 is an opportunity to be at the nexus of change, innovation, and safety.

This article was originally published in the November 2023 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Building Safety Act: The Golden Thread offers peace of mind says Sherwin-Williams

by Breaking NewsConstruction

The Golden Thread really is ‘golden’

Three Gateways signpost the way to getting it right

Consequences are tough for non-compliance

The terms under the new Building Safety Act 2022 became enforceable from October 1st this year. Here, Bob Glendenning, Fire Design Engineering Manager of Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings, examines why creating a ‘Golden Thread’ of information within the new legislation is so important for those involved in the intumescent coatings industry.

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) has been developed as a new framework for the design, construction and occupation of ‘higher risk’ buildings. These buildings are defined as being a minimum of 18 metres or seven storeys in height and comprise of at least two domestic premises.

These regulations required that all existing occupied high-risk buildings should be registered with the new Building Safety Regulator (BSR) from April 6, 2023 and no later than October 1, 2023. The BSR is an independent body which forms part of the Health and Safety Executive, which aims to raise building safety standards and the performance of buildings whilst also monitoring the competence of regulators and industry professionals.

The reality of this new legislation is that under the terms of the Act, a Principal Accountable Person who fails to register an occupied higher-risk building ‘without a reasonable excuse’ will be liable to either a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

The Principal Accountable Person is described as the organisation or person who owns, or has responsibility for, the building. It may also be an organisation or person who is responsible for maintaining the common parts of a building, for example corridors or lobbies.

The three Gateways provide evidence

The Golden Thread is an information trail that runs through all of the three Gateways from the outset to completion and occupation so that end users can be assured of compliance, quality and safety and have confidence in the products used to provide fire and life safety.

For the protection of structural steel with intumescent coatings, those who may need to submit information may include main contractors, architects, designers, specifiers, fabricators and applicators. Indeed, any party who is responsible for fire safety critical elements or components.

Importantly, the criteria for the Golden Thread requires all relevant documents and evidence to be stored digitally to prove that adequate steps have been taken in the construction and ongoing maintenance of a building.

Gateway 1

Covering the planning stage. This has been in force since August 1, 2021 and sets out the framework for the second and third stages. Applicants need to demonstrate that fire safety matters have been incorporated into the planning stage for all buildings. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), who are now also the BSR, will be part of the consultation.

If a fire statement is required to be submitted with a planning application it will be an issue for consideration for the Local Planning Authority (LPA) when reaching its decision on the application. Contractors should take note that if the LPA considers the statement inadequate it can refuse the application.

At Sherwin-Williams, our policy of early engagement and collaboration between all parties helps to clarify any points up front before they become a problem with the subsequent knock-on effect on time and cost.

It is clear that engaging multiple stakeholders – including designers, fabricators and applicators – early and consistently throughout the process is key to delivering a successful, safe and cost-efficient solution. Working together, we share knowledge and help our clients to reach their goals. After all, we are ALL now part of this renewed responsibility.

We encourage and fully support this early engagement, and with the correct information from the project team we can provide information and guidance on a safe and efficient structural fire protection approach.

Gateway 2

Submitting building control approval to the Regulator. This should include written declarations covering the competency of the main contractor, designer, a description of works and plans and a planning statement from Gateway 1.

Importantly, there should be information about how evidence is being captured to maintain the Golden Thread. The Regulator has a 12-week period to approve or reject these building control applications or to approve subject to fulfilment of certain requirements.

Any major changes at this stage will also need approval from the Regulator, and records of the controlled change – including an explanation of compliance with Building Regulations – will also need to be maintained. The categorisation of major and ‘notifiable changes’ are still subject to consultation under the new legislation.

Gateway 3

Providing information to ensure the building is safe for occupation. There is a requirement to submit a completion certificate application and provide updated plans.

These plans should reflect the scale of the higher-risk building, key building information, a list of mandatory incident reporting and signed declarations from the main contractor and principal designer that the works and building comply with Building Regulations.

Finally, confirmation that information for the Golden Thread has been handed over to the accountable person should also be declared. There is then a 12-week period for the Regulator to approve the application for a completion certificate.

We all have a role to play

Remember – responsibility lies with us all. Nobody in the supply chain can absolve themselves.

The Accountable Person must have assessed all building safety risks and taken all reasonable steps to control them, give the safety case report to the Regulator on request and apply for a building assessment certificate. To be clear, the information stored in the Golden Thread needs to be accurate, easily understandable, up to date and readily accessible.

In echoing the point made by Dame Judith Hackitt, we at Sherwin-Williams emphasise that the Golden Thread constitutes any relevant package of information which refers specifically to a project or programme of works. This could come in various forms including a product specification, marked-up drawings, CAD data, a BIM model, a product / member DFT schedule, application records or datasheets for example. As long as it provides evidence of good practice and compliance, it is relevant.

It is important to understand and work with this new process. It has been introduced for good reason and our message is not to underestimate your role whatever it may be from the main contractor through to the applicator.

We want our customers to embrace change for the better. Capturing relevant data on the use of our intumescent coatings all contributes to best practice for their own uses and for those people who move about in these buildings who surely have the right to expect the highest levels of safety.

This information validates each key stage of The Golden Thread. We should highlight that it is the responsibility of each Principal Accountable Person to provide the right information to the supply chain – including those bidding the intumescent fire protection package – who in turn are then responsible for all information being passed onto us being accurate.

Also, bear in mind that this commitment to best practice and gathering of evidence of compliance is not just for the short term but for the lifetime of a building and will be highly valuable should anything happen during its occupation. Think of it as future-proofing life safety for everyone’s sake.

To speak to Sherwin-Williams, tel +44 (0)1204 521 771 or visit the Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine website.

Second staircases to undergo two-and-a-half-year transition, housing secretary declares

by Building ManagementConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

Developers are set to receive a transitional period lasting two-and-a-half years.

This grace period will be before they need to implement a second staircase in buildings rising to 18 metres or taller.

The housing secretary, Michael Gove, made this announcement recently.

The transitional arrangements for this policy were elaborated upon in a statement on Tuesday.

Beginning of the transition period

The transition period will commence once the government officially announces the modifications to Approved Document B.

This document encompasses the government’s guidelines related to fire safety.

House builders will then benefit from a 30-month window. In this timeframe, they can opt to comply with either the existing guidance or the updated one.

Second staircases: Initial proposition and modifications:

Previously in July, it was confirmed by Mr Gove that a second staircase will be mandated for all new buildings attaining a height of 18 metres or more.

This is a reduction from the initially proposed 30 metres during the policy’s early consultation phase.

Mr Gove supported this alteration by stating: “This followed confirmation from expert bodies that they support this threshold.”

Furthermore, he mentioned that temporary measures are in the pipeline. These are intended “with the aim of securing the viability of projects which are already underway.”

Feedback from different organisations

The Royal Institute of British Architects took the lead in forming a coalition.

This alliance also encompassed entities like the Chartered Institute of Building and the National Fire Chiefs Council.

Their united plea to Mr Gove was to set the threshold even lower. The primary goal behind this was “to make the built environment as safe as it can be.”

However, in August, a group consisting of 29 fire safety professionals voiced a contrary opinion.

They urged the government to abandon the 18 metres criterion.

Their rationale was that “there is no evidence” this policy aligns with “data, science and expert advice.”

Moreover, they warned it might induce “false confidence in safety.”

Comparison with global standards

An investigative study by McGill University in Montreal showcased intriguing results.

Their analysis of 30 international building codes highlighted a glaring omission.

Only the UK and South Korea lacked a mandate for a second staircase.

For comparison, nations like the USA, Ireland, and Canada have imposed such requirements for buildings as short as four storeys.

After the transition period

Once the two-and-half-year transition concludes, a clear directive was provided by Mr Gove.

He stated: “All applications will need to conform to the new guidance.”

Those approved applications not adhering to this fresh guidance have a strict 18-month deadline.

This is to begin their construction “in earnest.” If they falter, a reapplication will be necessary in line with the new directives.

Clarifying the criterion for “sufficient progress,” Mr Gove outlined specific construction milestones.

He assured developers that the transitional stipulations will favour projects that already possess planning permission for a single staircase.

These projects, he remarked, can proceed “without further delay if they choose.”

Reassurances for the future

In a bid to clear the air of any misgivings, Mr Gove emphatically stated: “Existing and upcoming single-staircase buildings are not inherently unsafe.”

He added that they wouldn’t need a subsequent addition of another staircase, provided they adhere to relevant norms and are well maintained.

He anticipated cooperation from lenders, managing agents, and insurers.

He expects them “not to impose onerous additional requirements, hurdles or criteria on single-staircase buildings in lending, pricing, management or any other respect.”

For residents inhabiting new buildings towering over 18 metres, he assured that these edifices are already under the vigilant eyes of an “enhanced building safety regime.”

Upcoming clarifications

Mr Gove divulged that the Building Safety Regulator is presently collaborating on the design specifics for Approved Document B.

He anticipates making a forthcoming announcement on this matter.

IFSJ Comment

The decision to instate a transitional period for the introduction of second staircases in buildings is a monumental step in advancing building fire safety, particularly in light of past tragedies.

This move, drawing parallels with international building codes and standards, underlines the UK government’s intent to bolster the safety of its residents.

However, it’s imperative for the involved stakeholders, from developers to safety experts, to ensure that the implementation is efficient and cognisant of both safety and feasibility.