FDIS becomes first UK scheme with UKAS fire door inspector accreditation

FDIS gains UKAS accreditation

FDIS has become the first organisation in the UK to receive UKAS accreditation for certifying fire door inspectors under BS EN ISO/IEC 17024:2012.

FDIS, owner of the Fire Door Inspection Scheme, confirmed the accreditation relates to certification of individuals and is intended to demonstrate that inspectors meet the scope and rules defined in the FDIS Competence Person Certification Scheme standard.

The accreditation focuses on individual competence and requires periodic reassessment to maintain certification.

It comes as the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) and the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) place greater emphasis on demonstrable competence across the built environment.

Under the BSR framework, individuals must demonstrate the skills, knowledge, experience and behaviours required for their role.

Organisations must also evidence capability through management systems, resources and supervision.

Louise Halton, FDIS Scheme Manager, said: “The Building Safety Act and The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 are clear that individuals must be able to demonstrate the skills, knowledge, experience and behaviours required for their role.

“Fire doors are a critical life-saving component of a building, so the competence of the professionals responsible for inspecting them should not be assumed – it should be evidenced through recognised training, assessment and third-party accreditation.

“In essence, ISO/IEC 17024 ensures a person is qualified to perform a job, while ISO/IEC 17065 ensures a product, process, or service meets specific standards.

“Both standards aim to build confidence and trust through impartial, competent, and consistent third-party assessment.”

FDIS-approved inspectors are assessed through the FDIS Certificated Inspector Workbook and online activities.

The process also includes a portfolio of evidence, a practical on-site assessment in a live environment and a written examination.

Inspectors must complete annual checks including continued professional development and are reassessed every three years.

FDIS data shows remediation demand

Inspection data from 2025 shows that 72% of fire doors inspected did not meet the required standard to pass inspection.

Common issues included excessive gaps and problems with smoke sealing.

Issues relating to care and maintenance were also recorded.

FDIS reported that 70% of non-compliant fire doors required only minor remedial works.

Poor maintenance and incorrect installation were listed among the main safety concerns.

Fire doors being wedged or propped open was also identified during inspections.

Among the doors that failed inspection, hospitals, local authority and housing association buildings, and hotels and residential healthcare homes required the most remediation work.

These environments often experience high footfall and are used by more vulnerable occupants, which can increase wear on fire door assemblies and the need for regular inspection.

Changes in sector practice have also been observed since the introduction of the Golden Thread of information in building safety.

Nearly a third of FDIS-approved inspectors reported an increase in Responsible Persons carrying out due diligence when appointing a fire door inspector.

A further 59% reported rising demand for professional inspections, and 15% reported improved documentation.

Halton said: “It’s encouraging to see a growing awareness and focus on competence and documentation across the sector.

“However, to ensure fire doors continue to meet the required standard once installed, it’s vital that competent fire door inspectors, such as those approved by the FDIS, carry out fire door inspections.

“For building owners, managers and Responsible Persons this means recognising the level of competency required, proactively verifying inspector competence, keeping accurate maintenance records and quickly addressing maintenance needs.”

The accreditation places the FDIS certification scheme within the ISO/IEC 17024 framework while inspection data continues to show widespread fire door defects across inspected buildings.

Forza Doors expands Midlands and North commercial operations with new team appointments

Forza Doors strengthens Midlands and North presence with commercial expansion

Forza Doors is expanding its commercial operations in the Midlands and the North of England through new team appointments and an expanded Birmingham-based commercial team.

The move includes scaling its dedicated commercial team in Birmingham alongside three new appointments at its head office in Partridge Green, Sussex.

The Birmingham-based sales and commercial team will manage all sales enquiries across the Midlands and North.

Phil Pritchard has taken on the role of senior commercial manager for the region.

Callum Neilson has been appointed regional sales manager.

Matt Dobell has rejoined the business as regional sales manager, with responsibility for leading sales activity and developing customer and partner relationships.

Will Hunnam, managing director at Forza Doors, said: “Regional expansion has always been central to our strategy, so this marks an important next step as we move towards true national coverage.

“By strengthening our presence in the Midlands and the North, we can work more closely with customers, respond more quickly to project demands and continue to deliver the service levels the market expects.

“Combined with our refreshed brand and ongoing investment in our people and technical capability, this expansion reinforces our position as a manufacturer and employer of choice.”

Head office appointments support national sales and specification strategy

Forza Doors has also introduced new roles at its Sussex head office to support internal sales, estimating and specification activity.

Ricky Thomas has been appointed head of commercial, where he will lead internal sales and estimating teams across the UK, bringing more than 20 years’ experience in commercial operations, estimating and delivery.

Anthony Kennedy has joined as specification manager, moving from architectural ironmongery company Franchi and previously Allgood.

This role represents the company’s first dedicated position focused on engagement with architects and the design community.

Founded in 2010, the manufacturer has grown from 12 employees to more than 240 staff.

The company reported a 14% increase in annual revenue in the last financial year and has invested in brand development and operational growth.

JELD-WEN confirms certified timber sourcing across UK manufacturing sites

JELD-WEN UK timber sourcing and certification

JELD-WEN has confirmed that all timber used in its UK manufacturing operations is sourced from certified responsible suppliers, covering its facilities in Sheffield and Penrith.

According to the doorset manufacturer, both sites use timber from forests certified under the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) and the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC).

This applies to all wood used in its UK production processes.

The approach is intended to support protection of forests, ecosystems and natural resources, alongside safeguarding the rights of local communities connected to timber supply chains.

Traceability systems and wider sustainability targets

JELD-WEN has also introduced a specialist software system to provide full traceability of timber and support compliance with the European Deforestation Regulation.

This system is designed to track timber throughout manufacturing processes and demonstrate sourcing compliance.

Responsible timber sourcing forms part of the organisation’s wider environmental, social and governance commitments.

These commitments include reducing carbon emissions and working towards zero waste to landfill by 2050.

Cradle to Cradle Certification has also been achieved for core UK-manufactured products, supporting circular economy objectives.

Marcin Bacik, EHS Manager at JELD-WEN, said: “Protecting the Earth’s natural resources and playing our part as a manufacturer in taking action to help to mitigate climate change is a priority for JELD-WEN. Taking action to protect against deforestation lies at the heart of this.

“Creating products made with timber that is carefully managed is an absolute priority as this ensures the longevity of the world’s forests, which play such an important role in addressing climate challenges, but also ensures protection of natural resources.

“Low impact construction is the model that we need to adopt more widely, having a minimal impact on the natural world.

“Environmental responsibility informs every part of our organisation, and in the UK sustainability has been a lynchpin of development to allow us to build a sustainable supply chain, seeing considerable investment in more sustainable operations.

“Timber is at the very heart of what we do here at JELD-WEN making supporting sustainable wood sourcing second nature.

“Operating very much ahead of the curve, we have successfully ensured all wood used is from a certified source while we are in a position to already demonstrate the traceability required for the enforcement of the EUDR, which is still yet to come into force.”

The announcement confirms that certified sourcing and traceability systems are already in place across its UK timber supply chain.

Building Information Modelling data is shaping door hardware specification, says Consort

Building information modelling requirements and product data

Consort Architectural Hardware Director Daniel May has published commentary on the growing demand for Building Information Modelling (BIM) and its influence on design, specification and compliance processes.

Digital product data is now expected from early-stage design through to compliance, maintenance and product lifecycle management.

Since 2016, UK central government clients have required collaborative digital information management on centrally procured projects, commonly referred to as BIM Level 2.

These requirements are now set out through the UK BIM Framework and BS EN ISO 19650 standards, which expect construction partners to provide accurate, structured and accessible digital information for their products.

How digital workflows are changing specification

Architectural hardware, historically underrepresented in digital planning, is increasingly supported by 3D models, certification and performance data across expanding product libraries.

Project teams are moving away from paper-based resources such as brochures, PDF catalogues and basic CAD line drawings toward integrated digital workflows using platforms including Revit and NBS.

Forthcoming Digital Product Passports (DPP), expected to be mandated by the EU, are likely to further embed this approach.

BIM product data is now being used to support UK Government mandates for digital construction and the ‘Golden Thread of Information’, fire safety regulations that require verifiable product information and sustainability reporting that relies on accessible Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and lifecycle data.

Products that cannot be represented accurately in a digital model risk being excluded from project specifications.

Fire doorsets, traceable data and access to files

May’s commentary highlights that door hardware, while a small proportion of overall project value, has an outsized role in safety, performance, accessibility and compliance.

For fire doorsets, the effectiveness of the assembly depends on the performance of individual hardware components.

Within BIM, parametric data attached to items such as door closers can be used to validate fire ratings, confirm accessibility and identify coordination issues with ceilings, frames or other adjacent elements.

The commentary links post-Grenfell regulatory and cultural expectations to a stronger demand for traceable, verified product information, and references Martyn’s Law as an example of emerging legislation likely to shape how public spaces are designed and secured.

Auro Door joins SHED 5 framework as Harmony Fire’s IoT fire door offer

Fire door technology added to SHED 5 framework

Auro by Harmony Fire has been appointed to the Social Housing Emerging Disruptors (SHED) 5 framework operated by Procurement for Housing (PfH).

Auro Door is described as an Internet of Things (IoT) self-testing fire door and is listed as one of 30 products and suppliers on the £500 million three-year framework.

Harmony Fire said SHED is now in its fifth iteration and is intended to enable councils, housing associations and the wider public sector to procure emerging technologies through a compliant route.

Harmony Fire described the framework as working alongside the Disruptive Innovators Network (DIN).

Product features and comments from PfH and Auro

Harmony Fire said Auro Door was launched in late June last year and is intended to address installation, maintenance and “golden thread assurance” needs for fire doors.

Yhe product uses integrated sensors and IoT technology to self-validate on installation, then continuously monitors performance to check door gaps remain compliant.

Harmony Fire said the system provides real time alerts and a digital record of door use and condition to support maintenance scheduling.

Neil Butters, PfH operations director, said: “SHED was created to address a practical problem: housing providers needed access to emerging tech solutions, and smaller suppliers needed a route into a highly regulated market.

“Five generations on, the data shows that this model works.

“We are seeing more social landlords than ever using SHED to procure innovation, and more SMEs able to scale fresh solutions to persistent challenges such as damp and mould, building safety, digital switchover, decarbonisation, tenant wellbeing, asset management and housing supply.”

Ged Moore, Managing Director at Auro by Harmony, added: “The market reaction to Auro Door has been incredible since its launch in late June last year.

“Feedback and data from our live trials earlier in 2025 demonstrated the huge potential for our IoT fire door range and this has been validated through exceptional interest and orders from many of the UK’s leading landlords and beyond into other sectors.

“Our appointment to the SHED 5 framework represents another milestone in Auro’s rapid growth, which has also seen us add Auro Lume, our self-testing emergency lighting solution to our product range and the first reveal of Auro Myco, our connected response to monitor damp, mould and environmental conditions within homes.”

Harmony Fire listed other public sector procurement pathways where it is a strategic partner, including NHC Procurement Active Fire Framework, Fusion 21, Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), CHIC Fire & Building Safety Framework and the NHS Shared Business Services framework.

It also said it is a framework partner with Guinness Partnership, Notting Hill Genesis and Places for People.

Allegion UK commentary links building safety to digital fire door data

Building safety and digital fire door information

Allegion UK has published commentary from Sue Corrick on how digital information is being used in building safety, including how fire door hardware can act as a source of recorded data.

The commentary argues that improving the structure, quality and usability of digital handover information is central to meeting Regulation 38 and Golden Thread requirements.

Standardised, accessible asset data is presented as a way to support hardware specification, installation and maintenance across the supply chain.

It suggests that even highly mechanical components such as fire door closers can contribute to a more data-centred approach to compliance and building operation.

Certification, records and what data is used for

Corrick’s commentary sets out how testing and certification data for fire doors and their hardware components has often been inconsistent, missing or unverified.

Much of this information has historically been held in disconnected paperwork systems.

The piece states that test evidence should clearly show classifications, limitations and compatibility between components such as door closers, hinges and leaf assemblies.

Assessment reports should be transparent, retrievable and directly linked to a manufacturer’s products.

Digital record keeping is described as increasingly necessary for duty-holders who are responsible for products remaining reliable and suitable across a project’s lifecycle.

The Building Safety Act is said to have increased attention on competency and traceable, accessible product information.

The Golden Thread of Information is described as a legal requirement under the Act and a framework for creating, maintaining and accessing verified product data.

The commentary also references government proposals for a centralised library for construction products to expand regulatory coverage and support decision-making.

Inspection data from the Fire Door Inspection Scheme (FDIS) is cited as showing that care and maintenance issues are present in 54% of fire door inspections.

The piece gives examples of how door closer information can be embedded with the product itself, including video installation guides accessed via QR codes and safety critical data available through the Golden Thread.

Corrick said: “Fire door safety will always remain a technical discipline, but in an age where information can be accessed instantly from our fingertips, even a mechanical fire door closer has a digital voice.”

Fire Door Inspections – Step-by-Step Checklist

Fire doors are a vital part of a building’s fire safety system, acting as strong barriers that slow the spread of flames and smoke. 

Properly maintained fire doors give occupants time to escape and prevent damage to other areas, and are a vital fire suppression tool. 

Regular fire door inspections are essential to make sure these doors will work as intended in an emergency. 

This article explains what a fire door inspection involves, why inspections matter, the legal obligations around them, and who should carry them out. 

It also provides a step-by-step checklist to help you perform thorough fire door inspections.

What is a Fire Door Inspection

an image showing a fire door

A fire door inspection is a detailed check to confirm that a fire door assembly will perform correctly if a fire occurs. 

A qualified inspector examines the door leaf, frame, hardware and all related components to ensure they meet safety standards. 

For example, the inspector checks the door’s certification label and fire rating, examines the door and frame for damage, and tests that hinges, locks and closers function properly. 

Smoke seals and intumescent strips are also inspected to ensure they will expand and seal gaps in heat. 

Basically, a fire door inspection systematically tests every part of the door against a pass/fail protocol to make sure the door can contain fire for its rated duration.

Step-by-Step Fire Door Inspections Checklist

an image showing a fire door inspection

A thorough fire door inspection follows a clear checklist. 

Inspectors typically perform the following checks one by one:

Certification Label & Rating

Confirm the fire door’s certification label is present, legible, and matches its required fire-rating. 

Without a valid label, you cannot prove the door is properly rated.

Door and Frame Condition

Inspect the door leaf and frame for damage or warping. 

Look for holes, cracks, dented edges, heavy corrosion or other defects that could weaken the door’s integrity. 

Any significant damage should be noted.

Gaps and Clearances

Measure the gap around the closed door. 

The clearances at the top, sides and bottom should meet regulatory limits. 

Excessive gaps allow smoke or fire to bypass the door.

Glazing

Check any vision panels or windows in the door. 

Ensure the glass is unbroken, fire-rated and correctly fitted to the door. 

Improper glazing can compromise the door’s fire performance.

Door Hardware

Examine all door hardware.

This includes hinges, lock sets, handles, latches and panic bars. 

Ensure each item is fire-rated, securely fixed, and functions smoothly. 

For example, hinges must be fitted with fire-rated pins and allow the door to swing freely.

Door Closer and Closing Action

Test the door closer by opening the door fully and releasing it from different angles. 

It should close the door fully and latch securely on its own. 

If the closer is weak or jammed, the door will not shut, defeating its purpose.

Seals and Intumescent Strips

Look around the edges of the door for smoke seals and intumescent strips. 

These should be intact and undamaged. 

Intumescent strips expand in heat to seal the gap between door and frame. 

Any missing or torn seals reduce effectiveness.

Coordinator

On pairs of fire doors, check that the inactive leaf closes before the active leaf. 

This sequence is critical for double doors to seal properly in a fire.

Signage

Verify that any required fire door signs (such as ‘Fire Door – Keep Shut’) are fitted and legible. 

Proper signage is part of compliance.

Modifications and Obstructions

Look for unauthorised alterations (extra holes, cuts, oversized glazing) that might void the fire-rating. 

Also check that nothing blocks the door from closing.

Document Findings

Record the condition of each door. 

Note any faults or failures. Many regulations require keeping written records of inspections. 

A clear inspection report helps ensure all issues are tracked and fixed.

Why are Fire Door Inspections Important

Fire doors are only effective if they are maintained in good condition. 

Routine inspections help catch problems early. 

UK fire safety law (the Regulatory Reform Order 2005) makes it a legal duty to keep fire doors working properly. 

Beyond compliance, inspections are a vital safety measure. 

Fully functioning fire doors significantly slow the spread of fire and smoke, protecting escape routes and giving people extra time to evacuate safely. 

Over time, normal wear and tear, or damage from everyday use, can degrade a door’s performance. 

Hinges might loosen, seals might tear, and closers can weaken if not checked. 

Regular checks find these issues before an emergency happens. 

Inspections also provide documented proof of maintenance, which is important for audits or insurance.

How Long Do Fire Door Inspections Take?

an image showing how long fire door inspections take

The time needed depends on the building and the number of doors. 

For a single door, a thorough check often takes on the order of around 15 minutes. 

This includes opening and closing the door, measuring gaps, and logging results. 

For a building with many fire doors, the inspection will take correspondingly longer.

The total duration varies with how many doors are checked. 

Inspecting a small number of doors might only take an hour or two, whereas a large multi-storey building with dozens of doors could require a half-day or more. 

Factors like restricted access, complicated layouts or any required intrusive checks can also extend the time. 

In any case, it’s wise to schedule inspections well in advance so the inspector can work carefully and document everything properly.

What Happens if You Fail a Fire Door Inspection?

Failing an inspection means defects were found that could stop the door from working in a fire. 

The inspector’s report will list these issues and rate each door as pass or fail. 

If a fire door fails, the report usually includes clear recommendations on what remedial work is needed to bring it up to standard. 

Common fixes include repairing or replacing damaged seals, fixing hardware, rehanging the door to align properly, or even installing a new certified door if the old one is beyond repair. 

You should promptly create an action plan to address the failures. 

A failure should trigger repairs within an acceptable timeframe. 

This means arranging maintenance or hiring a specialist to fix issues quickly. 

Until the door is fixed, it should not be considered compliant or relied on for fire safety.

Are Fire Door Inspections a Legal Requirement

an image showing the legal requirements of fire door inspections

Yes.

Fire door inspections are explicitly required by law as part of maintaining fire safety. 

In the UK, the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (covering England and Wales) states that fire safety measures, including doors, must be kept in efficient working order. 

In other words, fire doors must be regularly inspected and maintained. Similar laws apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland (for example, the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 and related regulations). 

Fire safety legislation for all UK regions highlights these responsibilities, and penalties for non-compliance can include unlimited fines or even imprisonment.

British Standards like BS 8214 and BS 9999 give detailed guidance on how often to inspect doors, but following those is a matter of compliance with the overall legal duty. 

For residential apartment blocks, recent regulations (Fire Safety Act 2021 and the 2022 Fire Safety Regulations in England) have clarified that flat entrance doors must be treated as part of the building’s fire safety provisions. 

The bottom line is that if your building falls under fire safety law, you must inspect fire doors on a planned basis. 

Skipping inspections not only endangers people but also violates the law.

Who Can do Fire Door Inspections

Legally, the building’s ‘responsible person’ (often the owner, landlord or employer) is ultimately accountable for fire door safety. 

However, the actual inspections can be carried out by others. 

Basic visual checks can be done by trained in-house staff or facility managers. 

These routine checks help catch obvious damage like broken hardware or blocked doors. 

For full formal inspections, UK guidance says they must be performed by a competent person.

This is someone with specific knowledge and training about fire doors. 

This person may be a facilities manager who has attended a fire door inspection course, or maintenance staff with. 

In high-risk or larger buildings, it is common to hire accredited fire door inspectors from third-party companies. 

These professionals often hold industry certificates (for example from the Door & Hardware Federation or other bodies) and have deep expertise. 

The key point is that anyone performing the inspection must be properly trained and know how to interpret fire door standards. 

You do not have to be a fire brigade officer, but you do need either competent staff or qualified contractors. 

Key Takeaways

Regular fire door inspections are essential for safety and compliance. 

By following a systematic checklist and having qualified people perform the checks, building owners can catch problems before a fire ever occurs. 

Inspections confirm that doors and frames, hardware and seals are all in good working order.

This is so the doors will hold back fire and smoke as designed. 

UK fire safety law makes these inspections mandatory, not optional. 

A well-maintained fire door can save lives and property. 

Using the steps outlined above, anyone responsible for fire safety can ensure their doors remain reliable barriers in an emergency.

Complii adds passive fire expertise through Capital Fire Doors integration

Complii acquires Capital Fire Doors

Complii has acquired London-based passive fire protection specialist Capital Fire Doors in a move to expand its UK building compliance services.

The company, formerly known as Compliance Group, described the deal as broadening its integrated building compliance offering across the country.

According to Complii, Capital Fire Doors is recognised for third-party accredited passive fire protection solutions and a focus on high standards of safety and compliance.

Complii said the acquisition will enhance its passive fire protection capabilities and extend its operational footprint across London and the wider UK.

Range of passive fire protection services

The company outlined that Capital Fire Doors delivers fire door installation and repair, accredited surveys and inspections plus pre-planned fire door maintenance.

Its services also include fire stopping and compartmentation, steel and aluminium doors and screens and automatic opening doors.

Complii reported that Capital Fire Doors serves residential, educational, healthcare, hotel and leisure, commercial and industrial buildings across the UK.

The acquisition is presented as reinforcing Complii’s ability to offer a single source for passive fire protection within its wider compliance portfolio.

Leadership continuity and integration within Complii

Complii confirmed that Capital Fire Doors will continue to operate under its existing leadership team after the acquisition.

Commercial Director Michael Fisher and Operations Director Nathan Cranstoun will remain in their current positions along with the wider workforce.

Michael Fisher, Commercial Director at Capital Fire Doors, and Nathan Cranstoun, Operations Director, said: “This is an exciting milestone for our team and our customers.”

They noted that joining Complii provides additional scale and support while maintaining the service standards that clients expect.

The directors also pointed to access to a broader range of building compliance solutions across the combined organisation.

Complii stated that the integration is intended to maintain existing client relationships while offering a more comprehensive suite of services.

Complii fire division and executive perspectives

According to Complii, Chief Executive Officer Sarah Dixon views the deal as strengthening the company’s passive fire protection capabilities in response to rising demand and regulatory focus on building safety.

Sarah Dixon, Chief Executive Officer of Complii, said: “We’re delighted to welcome Michael, Nathan, and the entire Capital Fire Doors team on board”.

Scott McKay, Managing Director of Complii’s fire division, commented: “Capital Fire Doors brings exceptional accreditation and geographic strength in London and the South East, immediately enhancing our operational footprint and specialist capabilities.”

McKay added: “Integrating their expertise solidifies our position as the partner of choice for clients seeking high-quality, comprehensive fire compliance solutions across the UK.”

Complii highlighted that the combined business will focus on delivering passive fire protection and compliance services as a partner committed to shared safety goals for building owners and operators.

Rethinking fire door safety: Why Fire Door Maintenance says competence still needs work

Nicola John, Managing Director at Fire Door Maintenance, explores how consistent training supports duty holders, maintenance teams, and contractors in meeting regulatory expectations for fire door safety assurance

Fire door performance in the UK now sits within clearer competence expectations.

BS 8670 offers a common structure for roles and skills, while a consultation on specialist timber fire door installers is refining pathways.

Focus has moved to lifecycle tasks, from installation through maintenance, with digital record systems strengthening audit trails and scheduling.

In this conversation, Nicola John, Managing Director at Fire Door Maintenance, sets out insights from recent sector discussions, focusing on accredited training that lifts installation quality, adoption of BS 8670 to clarify responsibilities, use of digital records for oversight and closer links to third-party verification so procurement, inspection and maintenance align.

What are you seeing day-to-day in terms of how fire door regulations are being followed on the ground?

We’ve seen a real shift in awareness since Grenfell, and many responsible persons are working hard to meet their legal obligations.

But understandably, some are still navigating the complexity of evolving regulations.

It’s not always easy to keep up, particularly for overstretched teams or those without dedicated fire safety support.

We’re also seeing positive intent – but sometimes a lack of technical knowledge – on the ground.

For instance, we still come across fire doors that have been installed by operatives without specific training, or buildings where maintenance checks have lapsed.

That’s where the risk lies.

With the right knowledge and support, these are issues we can absolutely tackle.

Where do you think the biggest misunderstandings about fire door compliance lie?

There’s still a perception in some areas that once a fire door is installed, the job’s done.

But they’re active safety systems that need ongoing care.

We’re doing a lot of work to help duty holders understand that responsibility doesn’t stop at installation – it extends across the full lifecycle.

The good news is, we’re seeing more clients ask the right questions.

That shows the message is starting to land.

How would you assess current levels of competence across those responsible for specifying, fitting or maintaining fire doors?

There’s a growing commitment to getting this right – and many fantastic professionals out there doing high-quality work.

But there are still gaps in consistency.

In particular, general contractors are sometimes asked to take on fire door work without having had the right training.

That’s why developments like BS 8670 are so important.

By providing a common framework for competence across the built environment, it gives the sector a shared language and standard to work towards.

We’re already seeing competency groups and employers start to embed this, which is a really encouraging step.

What are some of the most common failings when it comes to fire door maintenance or installation?

Installation is still a sticking point.

We see things like incorrect gaps, or the wrong components used.

These mistakes often stem from a lack of awareness rather than intent – and they’re avoidable with better training.

On the maintenance side, the most common issue is neglect over time: closers that no longer work, seals that have deteriorated, or doors that haven’t been inspected for years.

But again, these are challenges we can absolutely solve with the right systems, support and upskilling.

Why do you think poor practices still persist, even with clear guidance available?

In many cases, it’s not due to disregard – it’s down to capacity, confidence, or simply not knowing where to start.

Fire safety has traditionally been treated as a box-ticking exercise, but that’s changing.

One thing we’re keen to promote is the need for practical, hands-on training.

You can’t build real competence through guidance documents alone – especially for roles that are hands-on by nature.

That’s why we believe in investing in meaningful, accredited training that builds confidence and capability on site.

What are some simple changes that companies could make today to improve safety?

Prioritise training.

It’s one of the most effective ways to raise standards quickly.

When staff are trained through accredited centres like FDM, they’re not just ticking a box – they’re building the knowledge and confidence to do the job properly.

It also helps create a culture where people feel empowered to speak up, question things, and take responsibility for safety.

That culture shift is where real improvement starts.

How can better record-keeping or digital tools help raise standards in this area?

Digital tools are a huge opportunity.

They give responsible persons visibility over what’s been done, what’s due, and what needs fixing – without having to rely on paperwork alone.

That audit trail is important not just for compliance, but for peace of mind.

We’re seeing more companies explore these tools as part of a wider commitment to accountability and improvement, which is a great sign.

What’s missing from the current enforcement or oversight of fire door regulations?

There’s definitely a need for more proactive enforcement.

Fire and rescue services do brilliant work, but they’re stretched.

We welcome the progress being made through the development of competency frameworks using guidance like BS8670, which help define what good looks like.

The next step is for employers to really engage with that – by investing in staff development and understanding what ‘competence’ means in practice.

That’s how we move from minimum compliance to real assurance.

Do you expect further updates to legislation in this area and what would you like to see included?

Yes, and that’s a positive.

We’re seeing a stronger focus on competence across the board, and legislation that supports that shift is welcome.

But regulation on its own isn’t enough.

We need joined-up thinking between designers, contractors and building managers – and a clear link between training and third-party schemes that verify work on site.

That consistency builds trust, and helps raise standards across the industry.

We’ve recently seen a consultation on the competency framework for specialist timber fire door installers, which is a positive step in the right direction.

But the industry still needs clearer guidance across the board.

Operatives working with a wide range of products and site types need a consistent framework that supports quality, regardless of the door type being installed.

What will it take to create lasting change across the industry – cultural, legal or operational?

It’s a mix of all three.

Legally, we need clarity and enforcement.

Operationally, we need better procurement and practical training.

But the cultural piece is just as important: we need to shift from seeing fire doors as assets to maintain, to seeing them as life-saving systems.

The direction of travel is encouraging.

We’re having the right conversations, and now it’s about turning that into action.

We’ve always believed that lasting change comes from a holistic approach – supporting everyone involved in the fire door chain, not just in theory but in day-to-day practice.

That’s been recognised by Dame Judith Hackitt, who highlighted our work as an example of the kind of thinking needed to drive real industry progress.

For us, it’s about working with industry to embed the right mindset, skills and systems at every level.

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

How JELD-WEN’s new contractor management process raises the bar for site safety

JELD-WEN introduces contractor management room to improve site safety

JELD-WEN has opened a new contractor management room at its Sheffield site as part of wider improvements to its safety processes.

The manufacturer said the new facility was introduced to strengthen oversight of contractor activities and ensure on-site safety applies equally to external contractors and internal staff.

The new area includes an on-site mapping system that provides real-time visibility of where contractors are working across the facility.

JELD-WEN explained that while the company already had strong health and safety procedures, the new measures were developed to create clearer processes for contractors attending the site.

Oversight, induction and auditing improvements

The contractor management room provides a space for a ‘Responsible Person’ to carry out safety inductions, verify documentation and confirm contractor competency.

The company said the process ensures that risk assessments and method statements accurately reflect the work being undertaken.

The system also uses JELD-WEN’s existing auditing framework to verify compliance with safety procedures and conduct periodic checks throughout the working day.

Following a trial period, during which feedback from contractors and site teams was collected, the new contractor management room is now fully operational.

Reinforcing commitment to health and safety

Paul Bailey, Environment, Health and Safety Manager at JELD-WEN Sheffield, said: “Safety is a number one priority for JELD-WEN, and we have robust procedures in place across the site to safeguard employees, contractors and visitors. However, it was felt that we could enhance our procedures further to ensure optimal safety.

“Thanks to this new initiative and improved visual management, the contractor management room shows exactly how many contractors we have on site at any one time, and where each set of works is taking place.

“The introduction of the contractor management room reaffirms JELD-WEN’s commitment to ensuring the safety of everyone, at all times, on our sites.”

Implications for health and safety management in manufacturing

The development at JELD-WEN’s Sheffield site highlights how industrial facilities are refining contractor management to improve visibility and compliance.

For environment, health and safety managers, the use of a dedicated mapping and induction space offers a practical approach to maintaining oversight of external contractors during high-risk or concurrent operations.

Facility and site managers within manufacturing, processing and construction settings may also view JELD-WEN’s approach as an example of how to integrate contractor safety into wider site management systems.

By combining existing auditing frameworks with new real-time monitoring, the system ensures traceability and accountability in contractor activities across complex operational environments.