Promat targets drying process carbon footprint with steam reuse system

Promat reduces energy in passive fire protection board drying

Passive fire protection specialist Promat has cut energy use in its drying process by up to 66 per cent with a new technology installation.

The change forms part of the company’s ClearChange sustainability program and supports accelerated decarbonisation targets.

Promat identified the drying stage on a major production line as the most energy-intensive part of manufacturing fire protection boards, accounting for around 60% of the carbon footprint at that stage.

The company installed the new drying system at its Tisselt factory in Belgium. Working with cleantech partner CEE, Promat implemented technology that reuses super-heated steam to dry the boards. Heat is recovered and reused throughout the process via an industrial heat pump.

Duncan Gardiner, sustainability and communications manager at Promat, said: “The new line uses energy far more efficiently, with heat recovered and reused throughout the process via an industrial heat pump.

“Thanks to this steam dryer technology we have seen a decrease in energy consumption during the production of our boards, which is a considerable contribution towards our decarbonisation targets.”

Further steps in manufacturing decarbonisation

Promat is part of ETEX, which has committed to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The company continues to invest in lower-energy technology at the Tisselt plant, including solar panels and electrification of some production processes.

All boards produced at Tisselt carry Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) to provide third-party verified sustainability data for customers.

Promat designs new products with higher circular content and lower water and energy consumption.

The new drying process contributes to lower embodied carbon in Promat fire protection solutions.

National Training Academy launched for fire-stopping training at ROCKWOOL UK site

Training academy launch at Hams Hall

ROCKWOOL UK has launched a national Training Academy for construction and building safety professionals at its West Midlands global centre of excellence for fire-stopping.

The company said the purpose-built Academy will deliver best practice learning and practical, hands-on training around the use and application of its products for construction professionals, including specifiers, installers and fire engineers, as well as estate managers from the public and private sectors.

Fire-stopping courses are due to begin in January, with further topics being added through 2026.

The facility is described as providing expert-led practical sessions alongside specification and installation guidance aimed at supporting building performance, compliance and safety.

Course structure and content

The one-day fire-stopping course has been designed so it can be delivered to meet the attendee’s level of experience, whether they are a novice, intermediate or advanced professional.

Ben Peach, Product and Technical Solutions Director at ROCKWOOL UK and Ireland, said: “Designed by ROCKWOOL’s in-house experts, the Training Academy will provide guidance and hands-on experience to help people make informed choices around building design and performance.

“It provides a dedicated environment to strengthen technical knowledge and develop practical experience of working with ROCKWOOL products.”

Registration and online hub

Nick Wilson, Managing Director of ROCKWOOL UK and Ireland, said: “As the industry continues to adapt to the changes brought about by the Building Safety Act, ROCKWOOL is committed to supporting best practice and our education and training initiatives are key to that.

“We’re very pleased to deepen this commitment with the launch of the Training Academy and looking forward to welcoming partners to our flagship facility at Hams Hall.”

Organisations can register their interest in attending a course or sign up to receive updates as new courses are introduced via the Training Academy’s online hub.

Ci Global recognised with Best Passive Fire Safety Product honour

Intersec Awards 2026 recognises Ci Global

Ci Global has won Best Passive Fire Safety Product at the Intersec Awards 2026 in Dubai.

The award was given for Ci Safe, a fire and building safety system designed to detect early electrical warning signs and act before an electrical fire can start.

Ci Safe operates within a building’s electrical infrastructure and is intended to address risks before ignition occurs.

The system monitors for early warning signs such as abnormal heat build-up and fault conditions.

How the Ci Safe system operates

Ci Safe uses AI locally within the system to assess risk and apply autonomous intervention at source.

Cloud-based AI is used to analyse safety data over time, identify patterns and provide visibility across buildings and portfolios.

The system is designed to function both online and offline.

It is intended to integrate alongside wider building-management and national safety platforms.

Ci Safe also includes a command-and-control layer that provides real-time visibility of safety conditions for building managers and emergency crews.

This includes a live 3D digital twin intended to support situational awareness and coordination when visibility is reduced and conditions are changing rapidly.

Founder comments and Intersec demonstrations

Ci Global was founded by British inventor Anthony D. Parfitt, the company’s Founder and Chairman.

Parfitt has experience developing safety-critical technology for the UK Government and police, including the original ANPR system used by the DVLA.

Accepting the award at Intersec, Parfitt said: “Ci Safe was built because I couldn’t accept that electrical fires are treated as inevitable.

“Recognition like this matters not because of a trophy, but because it signals a shift in how fire safety is being approached – earlier, and with prevention designed into the fabric of buildings.”

During Intersec Dubai 2026, Ci Global hosted live demonstrations of Ci Safe at Hall 8, Stand 8G12.

Passive fire safety growth plan as Trail Group appoints David Humphrey

Trail Group appointment strengthens passive fire safety leadership

Trail Group has appointed David Humphrey as Operations Director, with operational responsibility for the group’s Passive Fire Safety division.

Humphrey has more than 25 years of experience in high-end housebuilding and construction, working for tier one contractors.

His experience includes cost planning, contract administration, strategic procurement, subcontractor management and operational oversight for major construction projects.

Jon Crosby, Managing Director of Trail Group, said: “David brings considerable commercial expertise, leadership experience and operational strength to Trail Group at a pivotal time in our growth.

“We are delighted to welcome him to the business and to the Board.”

Role scope and professional background

In the role, Humphrey is responsible for leading and strengthening the operational teams and managing the financial performance of the business.

This includes embedding commercial processes and delivering quality, compliance and customer satisfaction across workstreams and projects.

He will support the group’s wider commercial strategy, including new sectors and partnerships for business development, and will work with the board on growth plans.

He will also oversee passive fire safety operations from contract award to completion, with responsibility for delivery to specification, schedule and budget.

Humphrey said: “Trail Group is a business with real momentum.

“I was impressed by the entrepreneurial and customer-focused culture at every level; the high calibre of people in each division, and the genuine commitment to looking after its clients.

“Its teams have a really positive and proactive attitude, rarely shying away from a challenge, and consistently going the extra mile to deliver outstanding results.

“The opportunity to help shape and grow the business really appealed at this stage of my career – to build on these strong teams, strengthen commercial rigour, and open up new avenues of work with developers, public sector organisations, social landlords and commercial clients.”

Humphrey has a degree in quantity surveying and has held senior commercial and project director roles, working across pre-construction and construction delivery.

Trail Group said its services include passive and active fire protection, construction and refurbishment, security solutions, electrical testing and installations and planned maintenance.

The company said it works nationally with housing associations, local authorities, NHS trusts, emergency services, museums, large private landlords and commercial organisations.

Advanced launches “powerful” smoke control system

UK-based fire detection specialist Advanced has launched SmokeGo, a new smoke control system designed to provide compliant smoke management through Control & Indicating Equipment (CIE).

The launch comes amid increased scrutiny of smoke control performance and compliance across the UK construction and fire safety sectors, particularly in complex and high-risk buildings.

Approved to EN 54 Parts 2 and 4, SmokeGo is designed to comply with ISO 21927-9 and BS 7346-8 standards.

The system, available for the UK market, integrates with Advanced’s MxPro 5 fire panels, enabling both automatic and manual control of fans and dampers.

SmokeGo supports up to 15 fan and damper switch cards per P-Bus and can be scaled further using PENN or additional panels, making it suitable for projects of varying sizes.

Each switch card can control up to six individual fans and dampers, allowing flexible smoke compartment management and manual override options.

The control system has been designed to support faster configuration and commissioning. Configuration is handled via Advanced’s software, which pre-allocates inputs and outputs for fan and damper control and automatically applies required feedback delays, simplifying system setup.

Additional features include cascade mode to manage smoke spread across compartments, automatic stairwell pressurisation, post-alarm purge functions, and interlocks to ensure dampers are open before fans are activated, helping to prevent duct over-pressurisation.

Automatic testing can also be scheduled to support regulatory compliance while reducing maintenance visits.

SmokeGo is intended for use in applications including high-rise residential buildings, commercial developments, healthcare facilities and mixed-use projects.

Smoke control system with custom options

SmokeGo is also available as a custom panel option through Advanced’s AdSpecials service, offering tailored enclosures, interfaces and finishes for site-specific requirements.

Automatic testing can also be scheduled to support regulatory compliance while reducing maintenance visits.

Click here for more information on SmokeGo.

Rethinking joint systems: Siderise breaks down fire performance at the slab edge

Siderise explains the performance differences between one-part and two-part perimeter joint systems to help project teams assess the most robust option for curtain wall applications

Robust compartmentation, supported by an appropriate perimeter fire seal solution, is essential to the passive fire protection of glazed façade systems – and is legally mandated in many regions worldwide.

To prevent vertical fire spread, firestops installed at the slab edge extend the fire resistance of the compartment floor to the rear of the façade.

These solutions typically fall into two main types: one-part dry fit systems and two-part pack-and spray systems.

Two-part pack-and-spray systems

Traditional approaches to firestopping at the facade / floor slab interface require the installation to be carried out in two separate stages.

The first step involves manually compressing generic mineral wool safing insulation material (typically 25 and 33 % compression) before installing it within the movement gap at the perimeter construction joint.

The second step involves applying a wet compound such as mastic, spray ablative or fire-rated silicone over the top of the insulation to create a smoke- and weather-resistant seal once cured.

One-part dry-fit systems

These systems feature factory engineered pre-compressed stone wool Lamella insulation with foil facings applied to the cut surfaces of the fibres to retain the ‘built-in pre-compression’ firmly in place and assist with uniformity of product density.

Designed and tested to provide a robust fire and hot smoke seal in the perimeter void between the facade and compartment floor, without the need for a topical wet sealant, they are installed in a single-fix with further manual compression of 20% for a tight fit and to accommodate movement.

Unlike the wet seal of two-part systems, one-part dry-fit firestops can be ordered pre-cut to suit the cavity width and can be supplied as part of a complete system package from a single manufacturer with spandrel insulation, mullion and transom fire protection, plus ancillary components.

In addition, these parts are often tested together in multiple test scenarios, and third-party certified as an advanced perimeter fire containment system for a more holistic approach to passive fire protection in the spandrel zone.

Each of these approaches results in different characteristics when it comes to fire performance and resilience, installation accuracy and efficiency, and repeatability and inspection.

1. Firestop resilience, durability and fire performance

Non-combustible mineral wool firestops must be durable enough to maintain their form and fit, even when subjected to façade and floor slab movement caused by environmental loads.

The safing insulation component of two-part firestop systems typically comprises standard mineral wool insulation with horizontally oriented fibres, which run parallel to the floor slab when installed.

While this 90° or transverse alignment offers stability, continual exposure to building / façade movement makes the material more susceptible to degradation along its length, resulting in the fibre structure breaking down.

This means that the ability of the safing material to recover from repeated compression cycles in-service is reduced.

This can lead to the firestop no longer maintaining the compression fit, increasing the risk of a gap forming between the product and the facade over time.

Should this occur, the perimeter seal could fail prematurely, resulting in loss of compartmentation.

Furthermore, to ensure that two-part wet-seal systems comply with the criteria of any third-party approvals or listings published by the sealant manufacturer, the safing insulation product should always be the same as that used which was in the certified tested system.

Using substitution products risks undermining the specified fire resistance performance.

Meanwhile, one-part firestops with a stone wool Lamella composition, such as ours, comprise vertically oriented fibres that run perpendicular to the substrate when installed.

Products with a vertical fibre orientation are highly compressible and flexible laterally (across their width), which enables them to not only overcome challenges presented by curved and inclined facades, but accommodate the dynamic movement of the curtain wall or floor slab.

Due to the unique structure of Siderise Lamella firestops they are able to maintain their ability to recover throughout their design life, as demonstrated through extensive age and movement cycling testing.

This means that the seal is continuously maintained throughout the lifetime of the building and for the required fire resistance period in the event of a fire.

When exposed to fire, the foil facing is designed to delaminate from the stone wool Lamella core, allowing the built-in pre-compression to be released.

This enables the product to expand and maintain its compression fit and integrity, even under the greater thermal stresses caused by the fire load that leads to facade and floor slab deflection.

Both system types can be tested to UL 2079 for air leakage, determined as the L-rating, to simulate smoke movement through compartmentation in buildings.

Leakage testing can assist authorities in determining the suitability of firestopping systems for the protection of floor openings and smoke barriers for the purpose of restricting the movement of smoke in accordance with the NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 101 Life Safety Code.

The difference between two-part spray and pack systems and one part dry-fit systems is that the latter does not rely on a wet seal to provide an adequate L rating

2. Application conditions, consistency and installation efficiency

The wet seal compound in two-part systems is sensitive to moisture and temperature dependent during application and curing.

It must be applied in dry conditions and controlled environments – which can be a challenge during hot seasons or locations with frequent rainfall– otherwise adhesion, curing, design life and product integrity may be adversely affected.

In most cases, the maximum application temperature is typically limited to 104°F (40°C) as high heat can cause rapid skinning or premature curing, making tooling difficult and reducing adhesion.

Similarly, exposure to rain, running or standing water, or high humidity can lead to washout or uneven curing.

Storage conditions for wet seal firestop compounds are just as important as application conditions because they directly affect product performance and shelf life.

Most manufacturers typically require sealants to be stored between 40 and 80°F (5 and 25 °C), which in turn requires onsite air-conditioned storage facilities in regions prone to inclement weather.

Improper storage can reduce workability if the sealant has thickened, shorten open time and curing consistency, and compromise the fire rating performance due to chemical degradation.

Since wet sealants rely on direct contact with the substrate, surfaces must be clean, dry, and free of dust, grease, oil or other contaminants.

Dust or debris creates a barrier that can weaken bonding and lead to gaps or peeling over time, while contaminated surfaces can cause voids or uneven curing.

Furthermore, the wet-film thickness must be applied consistently to achieve the required dry-film thickness as thickness variation due to human error can risk compromising the slab edge fire seal.

Wet spray firestop systems require specialist equipment such as pumps, mixers and nozzles.

Transporting and setting up heavy spray rigs on high-rise sites can be time-consuming while tight slab edge zones often lack room for bulky equipment, especially when façade works are concurrent.

In addition to having to wait for the right application conditions, the ‘curing’ and overspray clean up time also needs to be accounted for in the project schedule.

The flashing used to close off the spandrel zone from sight cannot be installed until after the installation has been approved, which means site operatives cannot immediately proceed with adjacent works, thus potentially holding up the build program.

This installer-driven and weather dependent approach can make it challenging to achieve a replicable level of quality across whole buildings of multiple stories, creating bottlenecks, especially when inspections are required before concealment.

In contrast, one-part dry-fit firestops are not weather or temperature sensitive and do not require any specialist application equipment and surface preparation of the substrate.

There are no curing times, wet or dry-film thickness complications or complex compression calculations.

Their straightforward installation approach, including a standardised compression percentage, can streamline the installation process and help reduce the risk of human error.

They also provide greater freedom for the installer in areas where access to the firestop zone is difficult after the facade is installed.

Dry-fit firestops can also be installed before the facade (including from the soffit).

3. Ease of inspection

With two-part systems, once the compound is applied, verifying the correct dry-film thickness, adhesion, and safing orientation and compression becomes difficult without destructive testing or a two-stage inspection.

Alternatively, when dry-fit, one part firestops are installed, visual inspections are sufficient.

The wrinkling of the foil makes it very easy to confirm if they have been installed correctly without disturbing the installation.

Their dry-fit application also makes it easier to judge bracket locations and distances, and tight jointing to ensure a continuation of the fire performance around the perimeter.

This can not only help to ensure a safer building but also reduce additional costs and lost time associated with remedial works.

Transparent protection

While traditional two-part firestop systems have been widely used in US construction, they often present challenges related to long-term durability, installation complexity, and inspection consistency.

In contrast, one-part firestop systems that have been engineered and tested to meet key standards such as ASTM E2307 and ASTM E2874 offer a reliable alternative.

By delivering uniform compression, accommodating façade movement, and enabling straightforward visual inspection, one-part dry-fix systems support code-compliant construction practices and help ensure consistent fire-resistance performance across every floor and project.

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

Promat wins four industry awards for structural steel fire protection campaign

How Promat turned specification guidance into four awards

Promat has ended 2025 with four industry award wins linked to a structural steel campaign focused on testing standards and correct application of passive fire protection, according to the company.

The company said it received two Construction Marketing Awards, covering Best Mid-Range Budget Campaign and Best Go-To-Market.

Promat said the campaign work was delivered in collaboration with marketing and PR agency Lesniak Swann.

The company also said it took a gold award at The Drum B2B awards.

Campaign focus on testing and specification

Promat said its structural steel campaign highlighted the need for accurate specification backed by the correct level of testing.

The company said the work aimed to raise awareness of testing standards and correct application for structural steel protection.

Promat said wider industry attention has increased in recent years on effective fire protection for structural steel buildings, from design and specification through to installation and maintenance.

The company said this focus has highlighted potential knowledge gaps across the industry.

Promat said the campaign targeted architects, specifiers and installers, with attention on compliance with the Building Safety Act.

Guidance and technical comparison content

Promat said it published a guide to specifying passive fire protection for structural steel.

The company said it also produced a white paper on the effectiveness of using a board system against intumescent paint.

Promat said informative content was the key driver behind increased awareness of its passive fire protection systems for structural steel in the Drum Awards submission.

Individual recognition at ASFP awards

Promat said Product Manager Margherita Mullis won the Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) award for Rising Star of the Year.

The company said the award recognised Mullis’s work to extend the level of testing to support confident specification of Promat passive fire protection systems.

Promat said this included EN testing and classification.

Marketing lead comments on approach

Andy Mudie, Head of Marketing at Promat – Etex Building Performance, said: “To end the year with multiple award wins has been a fantastic recognition of the team’s hard work to publicise both the work that Promat do to support safer building design, but also to raise awareness of that across the construction industry.

“Taking an expertise-led approach, the aim of the marketing campaign is to add real value to those people who are looking for the depth of information the construction industry now demands at the specification and design stage.

“This is where our strength is as a manufacturer of passive fire protection – we know what works where, and what level of protection is needed.

“Through dedicated campaigns such as the structural steel campaign, we aim to raise awareness of best practice – and signpost what that looks like in practice.

“It is great to have seen this recognised.

“We are also hugely proud of Margherita and her win as the ASFP’s Rising Star for 2025.

“A passionate advocate for the highest standards in life critical safety, Margherita has been instrumental in developing product and service innovations that benefit Etex Building Performance, Promat, and the wider passive fire protection sector and it is great to see her passion for the industry celebrated this way.”

What this means for specification work

Architects and fire engineering consultants often rely on product evidence and test classification detail when selecting passive fire protection approaches for structural steel.

Promat’s campaign placed testing scope and specification accuracy at the centre of its messaging.

For specifiers and building services engineers, the guide and white paper referenced by the company provide material intended to support decisions at design stage.

Installers and fire-protection contractors can also be affected when product selection is tied to test-backed application requirements that need to be followed on site.

Standards and certification bodies may view the ASFP recognition as a marker of ongoing work around EN testing and classification that manufacturers use to support compliant specification.

UK fire curtain guidance updated as BS 8524 series is republished

Updated BS 8524 publication for fire curtains confirmed

The Association For Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has commented on the republication of the BS 8524 series for active fire curtain barriers, following release by the British Standards Institution (BSI) on Friday 21 November 2025.

The ASFP said the revised suite updates the UK’s standards for the design, specification, testing, application, installation and maintenance of active fire curtain assemblies.

It said the update followed an extended delay linked to concerns about scope overlap with a related BS EN designated product standard, which it said have now been resolved.

The series has two parts, comprising Part 1 on product specifications and performance requirements and Part 2 on a code of practice covering application, installation, commissioning and maintenance.

Where the fire curtain standard applies

The ASFP said BS 8524-1:2025 sets requirements for the design, testing and classification of active fire curtain barrier assemblies.

It said performance criteria cover reliability and durability, fire resistance, smoke containment, force-gauge resistance and the performance of control devices and ancillary equipment.

The ASFP said the standard applies to active fire curtain barrier assemblies made of any material, intended to provide fire resistance in most end-use applications.

It said the standard does not apply to barriers forming part of a building’s structure.

It also said it does not apply to theatre or proscenium textile curtains, fabrics for curtains, drapes and blinds, smoke barriers or operable fabric curtains used in retail settings for pedestrian access.

Scope clashes and EN 16034 clarified

The ASFP said industry debate has continued over the interaction between BS 8524-1 and the harmonised European Standard EN 16034, which it said is designated in the UK as BS EN 16034.

It said the redrafting work sought to address the scope clash and differentiate applications where each standard is appropriate.

The ASFP said BS 8524 includes testing requirements that it described as unique and more stringent, including cycle testing and independent ‘hot’ motor testing.

It said these elements are not covered within EN 16034, except in specific cases such as pedestrian door set applications installed in shopping malls where it said the EN standard is a legal requirement.

The ASFP added that the revised BS 8524 references ISO 21524, which it described as a new international standard for fire curtains, including updated test methods for features such as vision panels.

Certification route and UKAS accreditation

The ASFP said a lack of UKAS-accredited third-party certification schemes has been a challenge for compliance since the withdrawal of previous bodies in 2023.

It said UL has now achieved UKAS accreditation to certify products to BS 8524-2013 and is accepting new applications.

The organisation described this as an important step for consistent, independent verification of product performance.

Mike Ward, Managing Director of the ASFP, commented: “The release of the 2025 versions of the BS 8524 series marks a pivotal moment for the fire safety sector.

“After a prolonged period of confusion and inconsistency, the industry now has a clear and robust framework for the specification and testing of active fire curtain barriers.

“This update strengthens alignment with international standards, restores a vital third-party certification pathway, and provides the clarity that manufacturers, installers, regulators, and ultimately end users have urgently needed.

“The ASFP strongly welcomes this revision and encourages all stakeholders to adopt and apply the updated requirements without delay.”

What this means for specification and compliance

Fire engineering consultants, architects and building services engineers may need to check which end-use applications fall under BS 8524-1:2025 versus BS EN 16034, based on the differentiated scopes described by the ASFP.

Manufacturers and installers of active fire curtain barriers may need to align product testing, installation, commissioning and maintenance practices with the republished Part 1 and Part 2 requirements.

Standards and certification bodies, along with procurement and specification teams, may also need to factor in the UKAS-accredited certification route referenced by the ASFP, including UL’s ability to certify products to BS 8524-2013 while new applications are accepted.

SOCOTEC highlights construction fire safety advice on scaffold sheeting

Construction covering materials guidance restated

SOCOTEC UK & Ireland has reminded construction firms of UK recommendations on temporary protective covering materials (TPCMs) used on construction sites.

The company said it has provided fire safety advice to construction sites for over 10 years, supporting compliance with the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and insurer requirements.

SOCOTEC said the reminder follows increased attention on TPCMs and what it described as uncertainty within the industry.

Construction requirements for scaffold cladding

SOCOTEC referenced the Joint Code of Practice on the Protection from Fire of Construction Sites and Buildings Undergoing Renovation (JCoP) for recommendations on flexible materials used to clad scaffolding.

The guidance quoted by SOCOTEC states: “10.3 When flexible materials are used to clad scaffolding, these materials must conform to the requirements of LPS 1215: Requirements for the LPCB approval and listing for fire performance of containment net and sheet materials for external use on construction sites (ref 15) or Warringtonfire Certifire Technical Schedule 62, Reaction to fire performance requirements: materials used to clad scaffolding (ref 16).

“The material shall be manufactured in accordance with a quality assurance and certification programme, and the scaffolding covering material shall be approved by a third-party certification body accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service.

“The relevant approval mark shall be printed on the material”.

HSG168 advice on scaffold sheeting

SOCOTEC also cited Health and Safety Executive guidance in HSG168 on the use of fire-retardant scaffold sheeting where scaffolding forms part of the means of escape.

HSG168 states: “207 If the scaffold is intended as part of the means of escape the scaffold sheeting must be to a flame-retardant standard and you must carefully consider the extent of the sheeting.

“Do not use the sheeting to enclose scaffold stair towers or escape ladders (see Figure 7).

“This is to minimise smoke in the escape route and make fire and rescue service access easier.

“Flame-retardant sheeting is also recommended in other circumstances such as on a structure containing exposed timber or flammable insulation material or on an occupied building.

“An example of sheeting that satisfies flame-retardant criteria is that which complies with the Loss Prevention Standard LPS 1215 or equivalent, such as TS62: Technical Schedule 62: Reaction to fire performance requirements: materials used to clad scaffolding, CERTIFIRE product certification scheme.

“Products compliant with either standard will be marked with the relevant certification.

“If the sheeting is printed with an image or colour this may affect its compliance with the flame-retardant testing.”

SOCOTEC recommends reviewing materials in use

With the guidance in mind, SOCOTEC recommended that construction firms review any covering materials currently used on their sites.

The company said it provides Construction Fire Safety strategies for firms across the UK & Ireland, with a primary goal of practical solutions for fire safety problems that can be encountered on construction sites.

SOCOTEC said its website sets out information for organisations starting their own Construction Fire Safety Strategy.

The company added that its communication was provided for general information purposes and should not be treated as professional advice for specific project circumstances.

How Sugarcrete turned sugarcane bagasse into four-hour fire resistance

Sugarcrete sets new EI 240 benchmark

The University of East London (UEL) has reported that its Sugarcrete® low-carbon building material has achieved an EI 240 fire resistance rating in full-scale testing in Spain, supporting its use in high-risk and safety-critical building applications.

According to UEL, Sugarcrete is formed from sugarcane by-product bagasse combined with sand-mineral binders and is intended as an alternative to conventional bricks and concrete blocks.

The university stated that the material has an estimated carbon footprint around six times smaller than traditional clay brick while maintaining performance in use.

Sugarcrete was developed at UEL’s Sustainability Research Institute, where researchers have focused on combining lower embodied carbon with stringent safety outcomes.

UEL indicated that fire performance has been a central element of the development programme in order to move the material into more demanding settings.

Full-scale AFITI test conditions and results

UEL reported that recent trials at AFITI Laboratories in Spain exposed Sugarcrete walls to one of the construction sector’s more demanding standardised fire resistance tests.

During the test, the internal face of the Sugarcrete wall was subjected to temperatures of 1,100°C inside the kiln chamber.

The external face of the wall reportedly remained at 26°C throughout the trial.

The test was run for 240 minutes, with UEL confirming that the wall maintained its integrity for the full four-hour duration.

Independent assessors concluded that the system achieved an EI 240 classification under EN 13501-2:2023.

The EI 240 rating indicates that the construction prevented fire penetration and limited heat transfer for at least 240 minutes.

UEL stated that this outcome places Sugarcrete among the highest-performing materials in current use for sustained fire resistance.

Performance compared with existing wall systems

According to the university, Sugarcrete’s performance in the AFITI test outstripped that of standard clay brick and concrete block walls assessed under comparable conditions.

The results were also reported to be in line with specialist fire-partition systems designed for higher-risk environments.

UEL said this brings Sugarcrete into the same category as systems currently specified for installations where extended fire resistance is required.

The university added that the testing focused on both structural integrity and thermal insulation across the four-hour exposure.

The material maintained stability while holding the temperature differential between the exposed and unexposed faces of the wall.

Potential use in safety-critical applications

On the basis of the AFITI trial and independent assessment, UEL stated that Sugarcrete is now a viable candidate for a range of safety-critical applications.

The university highlighted potential use in industrial fire walls designed to separate high-hazard areas within facilities.

It also identified protected escape routes as a key area where long-duration fire resistance and controlled heat transfer are required.

Further potential applications include data centres, where thermal protection and compartmentation form part of wider resilience strategies.

UEL added that petrochemical environments are another target sector, given their reliance on robust fire-rated separation systems.

Low-carbon profile alongside fire performance

UEL noted that Sugarcrete had already drawn attention for its lower embodied carbon profile before the latest fire tests.

The university presented the new data as evidence that reducing embodied carbon does not have to come at the expense of fire resistance or durability in use.

It said that the combination of lower carbon footprint and high fire performance could give construction clients another option when assessing materials for high-risk settings.

Alan Chandler, co-creator of Sugarcrete and Associate at the Sustainability Research Institute, said: “This is a defining moment.

“To hold back fire at over 1,000 degrees for four hours proves Sugarcrete® is not only sustainable, but also safe and resilient enough for the most demanding environments.”