A student project at the University of Toronto has produced a design for an e-bike storage pavilion intended to reduce the risks of fires linked to lithium-ion batteries.
Are online marketplaces fuelling lithium-ion battery fire risks in UK homes?
The Fire Protection Association (FPA) has joined other UK safety groups in signing an open letter calling for stronger regulation of online marketplaces selling lithium-ion batteries.
England’s chimney fire hotspots revealed as new data prompts urgent safety advice
HETAS has reported that Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service responded to 181 chimney fires between April 2024 and March 2025.
Fire Aware CEO calls for cultural change in fire sector
Gavin Skelly, Chief Executive of Fire Aware, has urged a cultural shift in the fire sector to improve safety standards in the built environment.
Laundries face hidden fire safety risks at night
The Textile Services Association (TSA) has announced the release of a new code of practice on fire safety for commercial laundries in the United Kingdom.
IAEA experts assess safety at Rooppur nuclear power plant in Bangladesh
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reported that its Pre-Operational Safety Review Team has evaluated safety arrangements at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) in Bangladesh.
Pye-Barker acquisition expands safety services in Kentucky
Pye-Barker completes acquisition of Modern Systems
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety has confirmed the acquisition of Kentucky alarm and security company Modern Systems.
According to Pye-Barker, the deal extends its fire protection and life safety coverage across the state by adding full fire code compliance and security support for new communities.
The company said Modern Systems has operated in Kentucky for more than 45 years.
It added that the team has delivered customised and integrated security solutions for businesses and residential customers throughout the state.
Modern Systems’ service history in Kentucky
Pye-Barker explained that Modern Systems was founded in 1979 by David Morris, who remains the company’s president.
It said the business has developed a wide range of offerings including fire alarms, intrusion detection, video surveillance access control and licence plate identification systems.
The group added that its systems are supported by AI analytics and 24/7 monitoring.
It noted that Modern Systems also provides annual inspections and maintenance services.
According to Pye-Barker, these activities are intended to ensure the protection of lives and property.
Technology and leadership approach
Pye-Barker said Modern Systems’ use of AI tools has been an important part of its strategy.
It added that this approach reflects the forward planning of the company’s leadership team.
The organisation commented that David Morris has directed the company through multiple decades of expansion in services, technologies and markets.
Morris said: “Aligning with the Pye-Barker team opens new doors to achieve our mission of widespread safety in Kentucky.
“I am without a doubt that Pye-Barker is the perfect team to enhance what we have built at Modern Systems, thanks to their steadfast dedication to community safety and internal family culture.
“I’m excited and inspired to continue our work serving Kentuckians together.”
Pye-Barker comments on integration
Bart Proctor, CEO of Pye-Barker, said: “Modern Systems has been on the cutting edge of new security and safety technology for four decades.
“Integrating the team into Pye-Barker allows us to push innovation forward and ensure fire and life safety is constantly being optimized across the nation.”
The company stated that the acquisition is intended to bring additional resources and national support to the Kentucky-based team.
It added that Modern Systems will continue to operate with its existing staff in place.
Transaction details and representation
Pye-Barker confirmed that Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP represented the company in the transaction.
It added that the legal firm supported the process through to completion.
The company noted that Modern Systems’ customers will continue to be served without disruption following the deal.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The acquisition adds another regional provider to Pye-Barker’s nationwide network of fire protection and security companies.
For fire and safety professionals, the deal reflects consolidation trends in the US sector, where larger companies are expanding through the acquisition of long-established regional specialists.
It also highlights the growing role of AI-enabled monitoring and analytics in fire and security systems.
Professionals may note the emphasis on continuity of service, with Modern Systems’ existing workforce retained to support Kentucky customers.
Pye-Barker acquisition expands safety services in Kentucky: Summary
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety has acquired Kentucky-based Modern Systems.
Pye-Barker said the deal expands its fire and life safety coverage across the state.
Modern Systems was founded in 1979 by David Morris.
The company provides fire alarms, intrusion detection, video surveillance and licence plate identification systems.
It also offers AI-supported analytics and 24/7 monitoring.
Modern Systems performs inspections and maintenance services for customers.
David Morris said the partnership will extend safety across Kentucky.
Pye-Barker CEO Bart Proctor said the integration will support innovation.
Modern Systems will continue operating with its existing workforce.
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP represented Pye-Barker in the deal.
New European cladding fire test standard to take effect in 2026
Introduction of revised European cladding testing standard
A revised European standard for cladding fire testing will come into force on 31 January 2026.
According to DBI – The Danish Institute of Fire and Security, the updated method replaces the existing system of visual fire test assessments with a temperature-based approach.
DBI explained that cladding products such as plasterboards and wooden panels must protect underlying materials during fire exposure.
The organisation said current testing relies on visual observation of whether underlying materials, such as particleboard, show signs of charring.
It added that this can lead to inconsistent results between laboratories.
Jeanne B. Kirk, Resistance to Fire Engineer at DBI, said: “It can be a bit subjective and cause variations from lab to lab. Disagreements often arise in borderline cases.”
Temperature-based pass or fail system
DBI confirmed that the new system will determine pass or fail based on measured temperatures.
The standard will use a threshold of whether recorded temperatures rise more than 270°C.
DBI has been directly involved in designing sensor placement for testing to ensure accurate assessment of whether underlying materials risk becoming charred.
Kirk said: “It’s about getting data sets that show how the material actually performs.
“If the temperature exceeds the limit, it automatically fails.
“This makes the conclusion much more objective.”
Adjustments to European classification system
DBI noted that cladding in Europe is classified with K1 10 and K2 30 standards, which indicate protection for 10 and 30 minutes.
It said the revision expands how these classes are documented to prevent products being approved for applications they are not suited for.
The organisation confirmed that the revised rules redefine application areas, ensuring results reflect intended use.
It added that three test substrates will now be used – expanded polystyrene (EPS), low-density materials such as insulation, and particleboard.
Kirk explained: “If you test on EPS, which is considered the worst-case scenario, you are allowed to install your cladding on anything.
“But if you test on insulation, you can only install it on similar low-density materials.
“In both cases, the installation method must be the same as in the test.”
Flexibility for manufacturers in testing
DBI stated that manufacturers will have clearer options under the new approach.
It gave the example of plasterboard producers, who previously needed separate tests for each substrate type.
DBI confirmed that a single test on EPS will now cover multiple substrate types including cellulose, seagrass, PIR, and PUR.
The organisation said this will simplify testing and reduce duplication.
It added that the revision introduces flexibility in fastening methods.
Kirk said: “A lot of people ask why they can’t just test it as a wall – because that’s how it’s actually installed in practice.
“Now this will be possible, but then of course it can only be used as wall cladding.”
She added: “If you test with nails, you will in the future be allowed to use screws in practice – something that was previously not possible without a separate test or an assessment in the European classification system.”
Incorporating bio-based materials
DBI explained that the revision makes it easier to use bio-based materials in construction.
It said the current system requires testing for each product and manufacturer individually.
Under the new method, switching between suppliers will be permitted if the materials are of the same type and have equivalent properties.
Kirk said: “As it stands, you can’t change anything – not thickness, not density, not manufacturer.
“Now we’ll have a standard method that allows switching within the same type.”
Timeline and industry preparation
DBI stated that the revised standard has been in development for seven years.
It confirmed the changes will take effect on 31 January 2026.
The institute recommended that manufacturers begin preparing test procedures now to ensure compliance.
Kirk said: “When you plan a fire test, it typically takes several months.
“So if you start now, you’ll be ready when the standard will come into effect.
“And you already know what you need to test for.”
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The new cladding fire test standard affects how materials are assessed for fire protection across Europe.
Fire engineers will need to understand the implications of moving from visual to temperature-based assessments.
Regulators and testing bodies will apply the revised classification system when approving cladding products.
Fire safety professionals involved in specification and inspection will need to consider the new substrate-based testing approach and documentation requirements.
New European cladding fire test standard to take effect in 2026: Summary
A revised European cladding fire test standard will come into force on 31 January 2026.
DBI – The Danish Institute of Fire and Security reported that the new system replaces visual assessments with a temperature-based method.
Pass or fail will be determined by whether recorded temperatures exceed 270°C.
DBI contributed to sensor placement design in the testing setup.
Cladding classifications K1 10 and K2 30 will have updated documentation rules.
Three new standard test substrates will be used – EPS, low-density insulation, and particleboard.
A single EPS test will apply to multiple substrate types.
Wall-mounted testing will be allowed if cladding is intended for vertical use.
Flexibility in fastening methods will be introduced.
Bio-based materials will be easier to incorporate under the revised standard.
Switching between suppliers of equivalent bio-based products will be permitted.
The standard has been in development for seven years.
It will take effect on 31 January 2026.
DBI advises manufacturers to begin testing preparations immediately.
The new EV rescue sheet website every firefighter needs to know about
Access to rescue sheets for US responders
The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) has reported that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched a new website giving responders direct access to emergency response guides and rescue sheets for electric vehicles.
The IAFF explained that this is intended to support fire fighters and emergency responders in safely addressing incidents involving battery-electric, hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fuel cell vehicles.
According to the association, the new portal includes files transferred from the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), which will discontinue its previous online platform.
The IAFF stated that the database now serves as the main resource for model-specific emergency documents covering a wide range of vehicle manufacturers and models.
It added that members can now find both current and historical documentation to help with incident response and training.
Content of emergency response guides
The IAFF reported that emergency response guides contain detailed information on hazards related to EVs, including fire, fluid leaks, submersion and towing.
It explained that the documents provide responders with procedures for immobilising vehicles, disabling high-voltage systems and safely handling batteries.
The IAFF said that each guide is vehicle-specific and covers structural reinforcements, recommended cut zones and restraint systems.
It added that guides also include details on stabilisation points, disabling methods and energy sources such as lithium-ion batteries.
According to the association, these documents are designed to reduce risks of shock, fire or injury when working at crash scenes or during recovery operations.
Role of rescue sheets in incidents
The IAFF outlined that rescue sheets are condensed versions of the emergency response guides.
It said these sheets are intended to be used directly at the scene of a collision or emergency.
The association explained that the sheets provide rapid access to information about vehicle construction, cut points and high-voltage component locations.
It added that responders can quickly reference diagrams that highlight critical systems such as airbags, batteries and fuel tanks.
According to the IAFF, this information helps responders make immediate decisions about extrication and hazard management.
Example: Alfa Romeo Tonale rescue sheet
One example of the materials available on the NHTSA portal is the Alfa Romeo Tonale Plug-In Hybrid Q4 rescue sheet.
The document states that the vehicle is powered by lithium-ion batteries and requires responders to follow strict high-voltage disablement procedures.
It warns that a lack of engine noise does not mean the vehicle is off, as it may still be capable of movement.
Responders are instructed to cut specific low-voltage cables to disable high-voltage power and to avoid orange connectors.
The sheet also identifies stabilisation points, hazards such as high-strength steel zones, and procedures for towing and storage.
Warnings within the sheet advise that gases released from damaged lithium-ion batteries include hydrogen and hydrogen fluoride, both presenting risks to health and safety.
Transfer from NFPA to NHTSA
The IAFF stated that the NFPA has now transferred its database of EV emergency files to NHTSA.
It reported that NHTSA’s portal includes over 480 results covering multiple manufacturers and EV types.
The association said that this transfer means NHTSA will now serve as the single national source for these documents.
According to the IAFF, this centralisation is intended to simplify access for responders and standardise the location of critical information.
The IAFF added that fire fighters and emergency responders should now refer exclusively to the NHTSA platform when seeking EV response information.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
This development is directly relevant to fire and safety professionals because it centralises critical EV incident documentation in one federal resource.
It allows responders to quickly access both emergency response guides and rescue sheets that provide essential information for safe extrication and hazard control.
The move ensures consistent access to manufacturer-submitted data covering battery, hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fuel cell vehicles.
For training, planning and live operations, fire and rescue teams in the United States can now rely on a single portal for accurate and vehicle-specific EV response instructions.
NHTSA launches EV rescue sheet and guide website: Summary
The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) has reported that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched a new website.
The website provides emergency responders with access to electric vehicle emergency response guides and rescue sheets.
The database includes files transferred from the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).
The NFPA has discontinued its previous portal for these documents.
The NHTSA platform now serves as the central national resource.
Emergency response guides provide detailed instructions on hazards, immobilisation and high-voltage disablement.
Rescue sheets give condensed information for use at crash scenes.
One example is the Alfa Romeo Tonale Plug-In Hybrid Q4 rescue sheet.
The sheet identifies lithium-ion battery hazards and step-by-step disablement methods.
It also warns about risks from gases released during battery damage.
The database contains over 480 results covering many vehicle makes and models.
Fire fighters and responders can now access both historical and current documentation.
The platform supports safer response to incidents involving battery, hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fuel cell vehicles.
This centralisation gives US responders a single location for vehicle-specific emergency information.
Electric vehicles banned from Alaska barges – what this means for remote communities
Alaska Marine Lines has confirmed it will no longer transport electric vehicles or plug-in hybrids to Alaska and Hawaii.