Second staircases to undergo two-and-a-half-year transition, housing secretary declares

Developers are set to receive a transitional period lasting two-and-a-half years.

This grace period will be before they need to implement a second staircase in buildings rising to 18 metres or taller.

The housing secretary, Michael Gove, made this announcement recently.

The transitional arrangements for this policy were elaborated upon in a statement on Tuesday.

Beginning of the transition period

The transition period will commence once the government officially announces the modifications to Approved Document B.

This document encompasses the government’s guidelines related to fire safety.

House builders will then benefit from a 30-month window. In this timeframe, they can opt to comply with either the existing guidance or the updated one.

Second staircases: Initial proposition and modifications:

Previously in July, it was confirmed by Mr Gove that a second staircase will be mandated for all new buildings attaining a height of 18 metres or more.

This is a reduction from the initially proposed 30 metres during the policy’s early consultation phase.

Mr Gove supported this alteration by stating: “This followed confirmation from expert bodies that they support this threshold.”

Furthermore, he mentioned that temporary measures are in the pipeline. These are intended “with the aim of securing the viability of projects which are already underway.”

Feedback from different organisations

The Royal Institute of British Architects took the lead in forming a coalition.

This alliance also encompassed entities like the Chartered Institute of Building and the National Fire Chiefs Council.

Their united plea to Mr Gove was to set the threshold even lower. The primary goal behind this was “to make the built environment as safe as it can be.”

However, in August, a group consisting of 29 fire safety professionals voiced a contrary opinion.

They urged the government to abandon the 18 metres criterion.

Their rationale was that “there is no evidence” this policy aligns with “data, science and expert advice.”

Moreover, they warned it might induce “false confidence in safety.”

Comparison with global standards

An investigative study by McGill University in Montreal showcased intriguing results.

Their analysis of 30 international building codes highlighted a glaring omission.

Only the UK and South Korea lacked a mandate for a second staircase.

For comparison, nations like the USA, Ireland, and Canada have imposed such requirements for buildings as short as four storeys.

After the transition period

Once the two-and-half-year transition concludes, a clear directive was provided by Mr Gove.

He stated: “All applications will need to conform to the new guidance.”

Those approved applications not adhering to this fresh guidance have a strict 18-month deadline.

This is to begin their construction “in earnest.” If they falter, a reapplication will be necessary in line with the new directives.

Clarifying the criterion for “sufficient progress,” Mr Gove outlined specific construction milestones.

He assured developers that the transitional stipulations will favour projects that already possess planning permission for a single staircase.

These projects, he remarked, can proceed “without further delay if they choose.”

Reassurances for the future

In a bid to clear the air of any misgivings, Mr Gove emphatically stated: “Existing and upcoming single-staircase buildings are not inherently unsafe.”

He added that they wouldn’t need a subsequent addition of another staircase, provided they adhere to relevant norms and are well maintained.

He anticipated cooperation from lenders, managing agents, and insurers.

He expects them “not to impose onerous additional requirements, hurdles or criteria on single-staircase buildings in lending, pricing, management or any other respect.”

For residents inhabiting new buildings towering over 18 metres, he assured that these edifices are already under the vigilant eyes of an “enhanced building safety regime.”

Upcoming clarifications

Mr Gove divulged that the Building Safety Regulator is presently collaborating on the design specifics for Approved Document B.

He anticipates making a forthcoming announcement on this matter.

IFSJ Comment

The decision to instate a transitional period for the introduction of second staircases in buildings is a monumental step in advancing building fire safety, particularly in light of past tragedies.

This move, drawing parallels with international building codes and standards, underlines the UK government’s intent to bolster the safety of its residents.

However, it’s imperative for the involved stakeholders, from developers to safety experts, to ensure that the implementation is efficient and cognisant of both safety and feasibility.

Building safety improvements proposed with fire survival circuit cables

Addressing building safety concerns

A new white paper has been launched by Wrexham Mineral Cables (WMC) targeting serious concerns regarding building safety systems failures.

Central to this paper is the crucial role that cable specification plays in ensuring safety.

The report can be accessed for free from WMC’s website.

Understanding the role of cables in building safety

The white paper, titled Expecting the unexpected: specifying safety-critical circuit cables for fire survival, was produced in light of increasing concerns over building safety, particularly following incidents like the Grenfell Tower fire.

The paper highlights the importance of electricity supply in safety systems: “Building systems depend on the electricity supply being maintained in order to help keep occupants safe as they evacuate,” WMC states.

Further, it emphasises that the cables supporting these systems play a pivotal role in fire safety.

Choosing the right cables for safety

While both polymeric cables and mineral-insulated copper clad (MICC) cables are labelled as fire-resistant, the paper illustrates that they are not equally effective.

Notably, MICC cables have shown superior performance in real fire situations, highlighting a significant disparity in safety standards.

Despite this, there’s no mandate for the use of MICC cables in safety-critical applications, leading WMC to voice concerns about ongoing risks to both buildings and their occupants.

Improving the understanding of cable performance

After engaging with this paper, those responsible for specification will gain insights into the function and testing of fire performance cables.

It underscores that cables marked as fire-resistant might not always meet expectations in actual fire events.

WMC’s white paper rounds off by underlining the effectiveness of MICC as the true ‘fire survival’ cable, advocating its potential to elevate building safety levels, independent of changes in regulations.

Wrexham Mineral Cables comments on the report

Commenting on the paper’s unveiling, Colin Hughes, Group Manager at Wrexham Mineral Cables, said: “This paper is an extremely important and timely document.

“Questions over the effectiveness of cable testing regimes and current certification methods are nothing new.

“For many years, Wrexham Mineral Cables has made the case for better testing standards – especially for fire performance cables.

“Our paper looks at cable specification in the context of current attitudes towards building safety, and the shifting regulatory landscape – and explains the clear benefits of mineral-insulated copper clad cable – and its role in building safety.

“We welcome downloads from anyone involved in ensuring the built environment is a safer place.”

IFSJ Comment

Wrexham Mineral Cables’ recent white paper offers invaluable insights into the crucial role of cable specification in building safety.

The detailed analysis provided in this document illuminates the significant differences in fire resistance between cable types, shedding light on the potentially life-saving benefits of optimal cable choice.

It underscores the need for continuous evaluation and improvements in safety measures, particularly in the wake of tragic events like the Grenfell Tower fire.

This comprehensive guide serves as a critical tool for specifiers, arming them with the knowledge required to make informed decisions that prioritise both building integrity and human safety.

Welsh Government seeks input on amending fire safety in building regulations

The Welsh Government is inviting public feedback on proposed changes to Part B (Fire Safety) of the Building Regulations.

These changes primarily revolve around the use of combustible materials and the implementation of safety systems in specific building types.

This comes as a follow-up to amendments made in 2018 restricting the use of certain combustible materials in high-rise buildings.

Building regulations: Proposed changes to combat fire risks

Following their 2018 consultation, the Welsh Government is looking to expand on the previous bans by:

  • “Amend[ing] the ban of the use of combustible materials in and on external walls of buildings, including building types covered, attachments such as blinds, shutters and awnings”.
  • Proposing a specific prohibition on “the use of metal composite panels in and on the external walls of all buildings”.
  • Implementing an “Evacuation Alert System (EAS) in accordance with BS 8629 in all new blocks of flats (Purpose group 1(a)) with a floor 18m or more above ground level”.
  • Introducing “Secure Information Boxes in all new blocks of flats with a floor of 11m or more above ground level” and “floor identification and flat wayfinding signage within all new blocks of flats with a floor of 11m or more above ground level”.
  • They also plan to reference BS EN 13501 and BS 476 fire classifications used in Approved Document B (AD B) and “amend regulations 6 and 7 of the Building Regulations 2010 to permit the use of materials achieving the class A2fl-s1 or A1fl”.

Public feedback matters

The government is actively seeking feedback from the public on these proposed changes.

Those who wish to participate can send their responses to the dedicated email or the given physical address, which is listed on their official website.

For more details and to contribute your views, click here.

IFSJ Comment

Continuous review and amendments to existing regulations are crucial.

The Welsh Government’s proactive approach to seeking public feedback and being transparent about proposed changes ensures that the concerns of those most impacted – residents and building professionals – are taken into account.

The emphasis on the use of non-combustible materials and safety systems not only aligns with global fire safety standards but also demonstrates a commitment to public safety.

This ongoing dialogue is a testament to the importance of community involvement in shaping safer living and working environments.

Majority of high-rises in England comply with new building safety registration guidelines

In a significant move towards ensuring building safety in England, the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has progressed its registration programme for high-rise residential buildings that are at least 18 metres or seven storeys tall and have two or more residential units.

The deadline for the registration of these existing buildings was set by the Building Safety Act 2022, a measure instituted in the aftermath of the Grenfell fire tragedy.

Over 13,000 applications initiated for building safety registration

Since the opening of the high-rise building (HRB) registration service in April, over 13,000 dutyholders have initiated or finalised their applications.

This registration not only signifies adherence to a legal duty but also acts as a pivotal element in a suite of measures dedicated to guaranteeing the safety of residents in high-rise buildings. Information garnered from these registrations will assist the BSR in strategising the building assessment certificate process slated for April 2024.

Majority comply while a few remain; BSR sends urgent reminder

Chris Griffin-McTiernan, Deputy Chief Inspector of Buildings at BSR, conveyed: “We are encouraged to see that since the HRB registration service opened in April, the majority of Principal Accountable Persons (PAP’s) have recognised their mandatory registration obligations.”

However, he also emphasised the urgency for the minority who are lagging behind: “We are now urgently reminding the minority of dutyholders who have missed the deadline for completing their registration application, that they could now face significant sanctions, including prosecution.

“Please respond to your legal duty – act now and register to avoid action being taken against you.”

Detailed guidance, available since April 2023, enlightens building owners and managers about their legal duties for building registration. Furthermore, the BSR has conducted over thirty stakeholder sessions focusing on supporting individuals in finalising their applications.

For additional guidance and resources, building owners and managers can visit the ‘Making Buildings Safer’ campaign website.

IFSJ Comment

The announcement from the Building Safety Regulator signifies a commendable stride in the path of ensuring the safety of residents in high-rise residential buildings.

Instituted following the Grenfell tragedy, this rigorous process of registration reiterates the significance of compliance and building safety.

With over 13,000 applications either initiated or completed, it’s evident that there’s an overwhelming consensus about the gravity of this responsibility.

The BSR’s proactive stance in reminding and potentially penalising those who haven’t adhered underlines the imperativeness of this initiative.

For every stakeholder in the building and safety domain, this is a pivotal moment to pause, reflect, and ensure we are doing our utmost to protect residents.

Building Safety Regulator takes over as the building control authority for high-risk structures in England

As of 1 October, the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has assumed the role of the Building Control Authority for all higher-risk buildings (HRBs) in England.

As part of the change, developers constructing new residential buildings over 18-metres or those comprising seven storeys and having at least two residential units will no longer have the discretion to choose their preferred building control body.

The same rule applies to hospitals and care homes that match the same height criteria.

The role and responsibilities of the new building control authority

Developers are now mandated to seek building control approval from the BSR before initiating any construction project associated with HRBs.

Neil Hope-Collins, Operational Policy lead for Gateways and Building Control, elaborates on the modifications to the building safety protocol and the pivotal role of BSR in this new setup: “The Building Safety Act, 2022 (BSA) imposes fresh legal obligations on individuals engaged in the design, construction, and occupation of HRBs.”

Everyone involved in construction activities must ensure that they are compliant with the law.

They must also be prepared to furnish tangible proof of this compliance if required.

This stringent oversight aims to guarantee absolute accountability for the safety of HRBs throughout their lifespan.

Adding to this, The Building (Higher-Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023, effective from 17 August 2023, detail the building control processes relevant to all HRB projects.

Recommendations and the new regime

The new regulations, which encompass the technical specifics, embody the recommendations presented by Dame Judith Hackitt in her report titled “Building A Safer Future”.

They delineate the enhanced regime for the design, construction, and in-occupation safety standards for HRBs.

From October onwards, the BSR will execute its duties as the Building Control Authority with the support of multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs).

Comprising a registered building inspector and other essential specialists, these teams, under the guidance of BSR, will play a decisive role in evaluating building control application submissions, ensuring efficient regulatory verdicts, and structuring inspection schedules.

Though the assessment of plans and site inspections isn’t novel, the method of delivery is certainly a fresh approach.

The Three-Gate Approval Process

To augment regulatory oversight, construction projects on HRBs will now navigate through a rigorous three-gateway approval process, necessitating BSR consent:

  1. Prior to the commencement of building work.
  2. Before any major changes during construction.
  3. Upon completion of the construction.

Starting construction without BSR’s nod is now an offence, and the regulator possesses the power to enforce penalties for violations.

The article further details the three planning gateways and their requirements, with the third gateway emphasising the need for registration of the building with the BSR post-completion.

Registered buildings will undergo periodic checks by the BSR to ensure consistent management of fire and structural risks.

For additional insights, readers can refer to ‘The three gateways to building safety’ leaflet and the ‘FAQ Explainer – Building Safety Regulator as the Building Control Authority’, which provides responses to frequently posed queries.

All these details and more can be accessed here.

IFSJ Comment

Such reforms present a clear path towards enhanced building safety, addressing long-standing concerns in the industry.

By implementing a centralised control mechanism via the BSR, there’s a more unified approach to building oversight, ensuring that HRBs in England adhere to the highest safety standards.

This move, inspired by Dame Judith Hackitt’s recommendations, also underscores the country’s commitment to improving the structural and fire safety standards, a pivotal step for the safety and well-being of its residents.

The changing landscape of fire safety

Navigating the maze of new fire safety regulations, FR Consultants’ Managing Director Dorian Lawrence sheds light on adaptive compliance strategies

The introduction of the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and the Building Safety Act 2022 has significantly altered the landscape of fire safety compliance in England.

These new standards present a complex challenge that requires diligent navigation and understanding.

FRC, under the leadership of Managing Director Dorian Lawrence, has been actively engaging with this shifting terrain.

By offering tailored services, conducting informative webinars, and providing essential guides to meet these regulations, FRC demonstrates a commitment to assisting clients in meeting and exceeding these new compliance standards.

In this exclusive interview, Lawrence outlines FRC’s strategies, challenges, and unique approaches, offering valuable insights into the evolving world of fire safety.

His perspectives provide a thoughtful examination of the industry’s response to the regulatory transformation, and how FRC contributes to the collective effort of building a more resilient and compliant future.

How is FRC helping clients navigate the shifting terrain of fire safety regulations?

First and foremost, FRC is there to understand and explain the regulations.

Working closely with industry experts and joining government panels and forums, we can be at the forefront of new developments and advisories so that we can feed back the latest developments to our clients.

Once we understand something, we try to make it as accessible as possible, and we regularly conduct webinars, undertake certified continuing professional development sessions and send out fact sheets and newsletters, all with the aim of breaking down the very technical guidelines into simple, actionable steps and providing the necessary information on how to meet compliance.

We also offer services tailored to what the market needs in order to meet the new regulations, such as the recent launch of our abbreviated site inspection service to confirm whether a fire risk appraisal of external walls (FRAEW), as specified by PAS 9980, is required.

What are the biggest challenges in adapting to the new legislation?

The biggest challenges are probably the short time frame and the cost.

The sheer scale of this legislation – in a relatively short time, the industry has gone from self-regulation to complete external regulation that brings in the fire services, government bodies and consultancies – has meant that many things are being introduced without a long lead-in or time to adequately prepare and produce documentation.

It leads to a large degree of ‘learn by trying’ as everyone tries to grapple with the exact requirements of the all-new legislation.

This isn’t helped by cases in which legislation overlaps itself and – in some cases – even contradicts itself.

To some degree, this is to be expected with such a huge change of legislation, but it does present challenges.

What strategies FRC has implemented to assist clients in adapting to new regulations?

The biggest thing we’ve done is develop a full, end-to-end service from report to completion of building safety case, with every step in between provided.

For clients who want complete compliance and peace of mind, we can take care of every step in-house.

For those who need only a helping hand, we have produced easy-to-read guides on different routes to compliance and a legal notices service, and, most recently, our abbreviated site inspection provides an economical solution for those who need assurances on whether a FRAEW is needed.

How is FRC pioneering the adaptation to the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 and the Building Safety Act 2022?

FRC believes in the power of the new legislation to make the UK’s buildings safer, and we are doing everything we can to ensure the implementation is a success. That starts with education: webinars with partners to combine and share knowledge and ensuring that our clients can understand what is required of them.

We create as much collateral as is needed and try to leverage visual aids such as building information charts and fact sheets to condense and simplify the requirements.

Along with having staff undertake the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) Level 6 diploma to prepare them for looking after the day-to-day management of fire and structural safety in higher risk buildings and establishing a clear point of contact for residents for fire- and safety-related issues, we’ve spoken to legal partners for advice on how to ensure correctness on all points.

What insights can you provide to property owners or managers on how to stay ahead of the curve?

There are two main routes you can go, depending on how confident you are.

The first is, as mentioned, to use an all in-house, end-to-end service such as the one we provide; then you know without a doubt that everything is up to scratch and will meet compliance.

If you manage the process yourself, prioritisation is key: understand what you need to do, break it down into steps and tackle tasks one at a time.

There are also lots of things that will take time, so get things rolling straight away.

It’s always worth getting advice, though, and the most important thing is to ensure that you are listening to qualified, experienced professionals.

How has FRC’s approach aided clients in navigating new fire safety regulations?

Our approach to diligence and detail, combined with our goal to improve fire safety, means we are 100% committed to backing the legislation.

This has been proven on several occasions, but one recent example is when we provided a client, the property manager, with a PAS 9980 report.

The pledge developer of the building then sought out their own report, as is their right, but when this came back the property manager noted dissimilarities and asked us to peer review the report.

The new report that had been obtained by the pledge developer was absolutely non-compliant and suggested remediation proposals that were wholly inadequate, including that combustible materials be left in place on a high-risk building above 18 metres in height.

We were able to challenge the new report, and the developer’s suggestion that BS 8414 testing had been carried out, and to ensure that the unsafe measures proposed were not undertaken.

Unfortunately, in this instance, the developer was not forthcoming with their pledge and caused a series of delays, so we instead supported the property manager to find alternative means of funding for the life-critical safety remediations to meet the requirements of the Building Safety Act 2022.

Utilising our own report and the expertise of our fire engineering and building surveying teams, we helped to secure an alternative settlement offer from the building’s construction warranty provider that protected the leaseholder’s best interests while ensuring remediation proposals were carried out to provide a safe and fully compliant building.

We must remember the ultimate goal is to obtain a Building Assessment Certificate from the Building Safety Regulator.

Many works being undertaken by developers will not meet these requirements.

Be careful.

How is FRC helping clients prepare for the October 2023 registration deadline?

It’s important to me and FRC that the new legislation is a success that prevents fire disasters in high-rise and medium-rise buildings in the future.

We can provide an end-to-end solution to get them completely prepared for the October deadline, in which we guide and manage the whole process, step by step, to ensure all requirements are met and that the building is safe.

We also know that not everyone wants such a comprehensive service and have developed various single products to help people with only the advice they need, whether that is an abbreviated site inspection, a safety case report or a gap analysis to help them get back on track.

This article was originally published in the September 2023 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

UK government overlooked recommendations regarding lightweight concrete in buildings

The UK government did not heed advice regarding buildings containing potentially hazardous lightweight concrete, an issue that has since emerged in over 100 educational establishments, the Financial Times reported.

Government’s classification omits certain buildings

In 2020, an independent advisory group suggested that structures comprising reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) be listed on a high-risk register under the government’s Building Safety Act – a suggestion that was not implemented.

The government’s criteria for “higher risk buildings” presently encompasses only buildings taller than seven stories with at least two residential units, as stipulated by the Act.

Had the advice been taken into account, there would have been a mandatory addition of all buildings with Raac to publicly listed by October 1 this year.

Building owners would subsequently have legal duties to declare structural safety problems and implement risk mitigation strategies.

Currently, various governmental departments are working to determine the prevalence of this lightweight concrete in both public and private sectors, following reports of its existence in diverse structures, including schools, hospitals, and office spaces.

Concrete concerns amongst stakeholders

A representative for the government stated: “These reforms complement longstanding duties on all building owners to address safety risks in their properties in a proportionate way.”

They continued: “If properly designed, manufactured, in good condition and with good bearing, Raac installations are considered safe.”

Notably, both Heathrow and Gatwick, two major UK airports, confirmed to the Financial Times the detection of this potentially fragile concrete on their premises.

Furthermore, the University of East Anglia opted to close its Norfolk and Suffolk Terrace housing due to government Raac guidelines, impacting numerous students.

Matthew Byatt, president of the Institute of Structural Engineers, stated: “Not knowing if a building contains weak or deleterious material is clearly a concern.”

He also highlighted: “Raac is a known risk material that needs to be assessed to determine whether it is safe, and if necessary to have mitigations put in place.”

Regarding the potential dangers, Byatt commented: “If Raac is present, it could be at risk of collapse with little or no warning.”

History and relevance of Raac

The Building Safety Act, enacted post the Grenfell Tower fire to address pre-existing safety lapses, was instituted in 2022.

Asked about the categorisation of “higher risk buildings”, Byatt mentioned: “We fully accept that it is the elected government that has to determine policy and therefore what becomes law.”

Another source affiliated with the institute believed the government was correct in its categorisation decision, suggesting that implementing a mandatory registry would be “very hard to legislate”.

Historically, this porous concrete was predominantly utilised in public buildings between the mid-1950s and mid-1990. However, it was also found in commercial private sector structures.

Both Heathrow and Gatwick, privatised in the 1980s, have been cognisant of the material prior to recent public awareness.

In conclusion, experts emphasise that structures containing Raac are primarily of concern if they’ve been inadequately maintained, which is predominantly the case in public buildings where maintenance investments have been inconsistent.

IFSJ Comment

Understanding the materials that constitute our buildings, especially those accessible to the public, is crucial.

The concerns surrounding Raac reiterate the importance of continued monitoring and adherence to professional recommendations.

By staying informed and proactive, we can ensure safer environments for all.

White paper on building safety reveals improved management of information for safer homes

Making UK homes safer with better information

A recent white paper released by construction management software solution leaders Createmaster and Zutec has highlighted the significant role that digital technology plays in enhancing building safety and improving outcomes.

The study titled, “Building Safety in the Digital Age: Embracing Technology for Enhanced Building Information” is now available for access here.

The UK’s changing landscape of building safety

Published in anticipation of the next provisions of the Building Safety Act 2022, set to come into effect in October 2023, the report delves into the transformative journey the UK building industry has undertaken over the past five years.

It provides an in-depth examination of the strides made by asset owners and building operators in managing crucial information to meet regulatory requirements.

Particular emphasis is placed on the UK residential and rental market, corroborated by insights from two national sample surveys conducted with non-freehold tenants.

These surveys offer an understanding of the current resident perspectives on building safety, the availability of information, and service quality.

Understanding resident sentiments towards building safety

One of the standout findings from the paper is a notable increase in resident access to essential building information.

However, the report also acknowledges areas where the industry falls short.

There remain significant challenges in addressing maintenance requests in a timely manner, posing potential safety concerns for residents.

Another trend observed was the 22% spike in resident satisfaction regarding communication from asset owners over an 18-month span.

By 2023, nearly half of the participants demonstrated a better understanding of essential documents like fire certificates, with 90% being aware of the responsible party for these certificates.

Challenges and the road to improved building safety

While there is increased engagement and awareness, transforming this into actionable solutions for defects and damages remains a hurdle.

The majority of the respondents felt that their maintenance requests were not addressed promptly, with many reporting unresolved issues.

A further cause for concern is the decrease in service satisfaction by 10% over the same 18-month period.

The report suggests that residents today are three times more likely to inhabit homes with subpar maintenance.

On a positive note, only 2% of participants in 2023 felt somewhat unsafe in their homes.

This is a marked improvement from 2021, and it’s evident that residents now have a clearer understanding of fire safety protocols.

However, issues such as items stored in corridors, propped open fire doors, and faulty fire alarms still exist and warrant immediate attention.

Envisioning a safer future for UK homes

As the white paper underlines, while there are long-standing issues that still persist, asset owners and facility managers are on the right trajectory towards constructing a safer environment.

One of the central themes highlighted is the value of digital assets.

For the new regulatory landscape, maintaining the highest quality and ensuring safety will hinge on having complete, accurate, and easily accessible building information.

Zutec COO, Emily Hopson-Hill commented: “While there were significant advancements in information provision and communication, the time taken to respond to maintenance remains a sore point for tenants.

“Digitising property information is now a non-negotiable, especially for compliance. The report makes it abundantly clear that there are affordable tools available to ensure accurate, up-to-date building data.”

IFSJ Comment

The insights offered by the recent white paper by Createmaster and Zutec provide a comprehensive snapshot of the current state of building safety in the UK.

The advances in the last five years, especially in the realm of digital technology, offer hope for the future.

However, it’s also a stark reminder that there is much work to be done.

Maintenance issues and fire safety concerns cannot be ignored.

It’s essential that industry stakeholders take note of these findings and work collaboratively to ensure safer homes for UK residents.

UK Government announces new safety measure: second staircase for buildings over 18 metres

Sweeping changes in UK housing plans: safety and regeneration in focus

The UK Government has revealed a long-term plan for housing, signalling its commitment to regeneration and housing delivery across England.

Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, and the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove, announced plans to transform England’s cityscape

Mandate for a second staircase: a step towards enhanced safety

As part of its commitment to safety, the government has confirmed plans to require a second staircase in all new residential buildings over 18 metres.

This initiative aims to give people “unimpeachable confidence that new homes are safe and decent to live in,” according to the announcement.

The addition of a second staircase comes in response to industry calls for clarity and certainty.

The government is working quickly with industry and regulators to create transitional arrangements to avoid disruption to ongoing housing projects.

NFCC responds to the ‘second staircase’ regulation

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) welcomed the Government’s second staircase announcement.

In a statement, the NFCC shared their appreciation for the decision, noting that they had previously called for this safety measure.

Gavin Tomlinson, NFCC Protection and Business Safety Scrutiny Committee Chair, said: “NFCC welcomes the Secretary of State’s announcement that a second staircase will be mandatory for all new residential buildings above 18 metres in height… This decision marks another significant step in improving the safety of residents and firefighters in high-rise residential buildings across England.”

The NFCC is encouraging the government to extend this initiative to existing buildings by installing sprinklers and updating evacuation lifts during refurbishments.

More initiatives under the long-term housing plan

Also revealed in the housing plan are initiatives geared to revitalising cities and regenerating towns, with £800 million allocated from the £1.5 billion Brownfield, Infrastructure and Land fund to unlock up to 56,000 new homes on brownfield sites.

Reforms to the planning system will speed up new developments, empower local communities to build their own homes, and unlock planning decisions.

IFSJ Comment

This new regulation for a second staircase is a meaningful move towards enhancing building safety. By providing multiple escape routes, the risk of a single point of failure during a fire is significantly reduced, which buys crucial time for firefighting activities.

This strategy has already been successful in Scotland, and with this change, England is falling in line with numerous countries worldwide, such as in Europe, Australasia and North America, strengthening its commitment to safety in high-rise buildings.

Building control profession takes first step towards regulation

In a significant move, the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) announced on 17th July 2023 that the first steps have been taken to regulate the building control profession.

This development, made in association with two independent provider schemes, aims to pave the way for building control professionals to register as building inspectors.

First organisations to become independent competence assessors for building control surveyors in England

The Building Safety Competence Foundation and the Chartered Association of Building Engineers (CABE) have been announced as the first organisations to undertake independent competence assessments for all building control surveyors in England.

This competence assessment is a crucial part of the pathway for these professionals to attain registered building inspector status.

Regulating building control: over 4,500 professionals to be assessed and certified

According to the BSR, more than 4,500 building control professionals will need to be evaluated and certified by April 2024.

This will facilitate their transition to becoming registered building inspectors.

From April 2024, working within Building Control across the entire built environment in England without certification will be prohibited.

New Building Inspector Competence Framework to guide assessments

Candidates for registered building inspector status will be assessed based on the Building Inspector Competence Framework (BICoF) classes 2 – 4 every four years.

The BICoF targets the skills, knowledge, experience, and behaviours anticipated of registered building inspectors, and is split into nine interrelated subject areas.

Dr Gavin Dunn, Chief Executive of CABE, commented on this development: “Building control professionals have a vital role in helping to deliver buildings that are safe, sustainable, and accessible to all.

“We are delighted to be able to play our part in supporting professionals to demonstrate their competence and in developing a culture of continuous improvement.”

Lorna Stimpson, the BSCF’s Chief Executive, expressed her satisfaction: “We are delighted to have received approval from the Building Safety Regulator to provide independent competence assessments for building control surveyors in England.”

Legacy of the Grenfell Tower tragedy: building control now a regulated profession

Regulating the building control profession and requiring these professionals to demonstrate their competency to the BSR forms part of the legacy of the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy.

HSE’s Director of Building Safety, Philip White, emphasised that this step is key to restoring public faith in the building control profession after the Grenfell incident.

IFSJ Comment

The move towards making building control a regulated profession underscores the significance of ensuring the safety of our built environment.

It marks a significant step towards transparency, accountability and competence within the industry.