Updated UK fire safety regulations emphasise role of Responsible Persons

A close look at the updated fire safety responsibilities

The United Kingdom government has released new guidance on fire safety, affecting non-domestic premises where people work, stay, or visit, such as workplaces and the communal areas of multi-occupied residential buildings.

The full guidance is available on the government’s website.

Primary enforcing bodies maintain their roles

The primary enforcing bodies for the Fire Safety Order remain the local fire and rescue authorities, the Health and Safety Executive, the Defence Fire Safety Regulator, and the Crown Premises Fire Safety Inspectorate, depending on the nature and occupancy of the building.

Changes to Responsible Persons’ duties under the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Bill was given Royal Assent in April 2022, becoming the Building Safety Act 2022. The legislation amends the Fire Safety Order and introduces a slew of new requirements for responsible persons.

Key among these changes is the increased emphasis on recording: completed fire risk assessments, contact information, fire safety arrangements, and the identity of any individual or organisation involved in undertaking or reviewing fire risk assessments.

Responsible persons are now required to share relevant fire safety information with incoming responsible persons.

For buildings housing two or more sets of domestic premises, responsible persons must provide residents with easily understandable fire safety information.

The act also strengthens the status of statutory guidance issued under Article 50 of the Fire Safety Order and introduces higher fines for some offences.

The need for competence in fire risk assessments

It’s worth noting that under the new legislation, if a responsible person appoints someone to conduct or review the fire risk assessment, that person must be competent.

The competent person should have enough training, experience, or knowledge to carry out the task effectively.

Duties of responsible persons in multi-occupied premises

In multi-occupancy commercial buildings, the responsibility does not lie solely with individual businesses. The landlord or a managing agent, who has overall responsibility for safety within the building, is also considered a responsible person. Responsible persons must collaborate, sharing names, UK addresses, and the extent of their responsibilities under the Fire Safety Order.

Cooperation between Responsible and Accountable Persons

In higher-risk residential buildings, responsible persons must identify and cooperate with accountable persons for the sake of fire safety.

This cooperation helps to facilitate a whole building approach to fire safety, making use of the Golden Thread of Building Information required in all new higher-risk residential buildings.

Information transfer for incoming responsible persons

Existing responsible persons are also required to provide incoming responsible persons with all relevant fire safety information.

If contact details for the incoming responsible person are unknown, it is advised to provide the necessary information to the building owner or manager.

Amplifying resident engagement and understanding of fire safety

The changes to the Fire Safety Order necessitate providing residents of multi-occupancy buildings with detailed fire safety information. This helps the residents feel more informed and involved in fire safety measures within their building.

IFSJ Comment

The Building Safety Act 2022 has increased the level of fines for certain offences under the Fire Safety Order.

It also strengthened the status of all Article 50 guidance, helping to establish whether there was a breach of the Fire Safety Order during court proceedings.

This news is crucial for all those who own, manage, or operate buildings in the UK, as it underlines the significance of thorough documentation, enhanced cooperation, and transparency in maintaining fire safety.

The regulations highlight the UK Government’s commitment to safeguarding residents and workers by improving fire safety across the country.

The role of responsibility in post-Grenfell construction

A new article from Rebecca Croton, Content Marketing Executive at Quelfire, looks at building a safer future as we mark the sixth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower fire

Six years ago , the world watched in horror as Grenfell Tower, a residential block in London, was engulfed in flames. The disaster quickly became one of the most heart-wrenching fire tragedies in recent memory, claiming 72 lives and leaving countless others grappling with the aftermath. To commemorate this somber anniversary and reflect on the profound implications of the disaster, Quelfire has published a compelling new article titled “Building a Better Future: The Crucial Role of Responsibility in Construction.

In the article, Croton notes the series of disastrous decisions and lack of responsibility that led to the Grenfell Tower fire, transforming a ‘normal flat fire’ into one of the deadliest residential fires in the UK. Faulty cladding, compromised compartmentation, and an unprepared London Fire Brigade turned a manageable situation into a catastrophe. The article reminds us, “Each and every one of the deaths that occurred in Grenfell Tower, on the 14 June 2017 was avoidable.”

The long road to disaster

Croton dives deep into the issues preceding the fire. The widespread disregard for fire safety in the construction industry and government circles over the preceding decades set the stage for the disaster. Deregulation, cost-cutting, ignorance, and corporate greed combined to create the perfect storm. The article states: “The mindset that fire safety wasn’t important enough to be made a priority meant that civil servants failed to drive through significant amendments to the building regulations.”

Post-fire inquiry reveals a web of denial

In the aftermath of the fire, various parties involved in the tower’s refurbishment deflected blame rather than accepting responsibility. From manufacturers like Arconic and Celotex to the Kensington and Chelsea Tenants’ Management Organisation, no one was willing to shoulder the blame. The article suggests that this type of blame-shifting underscores the need for greater accountability within the construction industry.

The crucial role of responsibility in fire safety

In her article, Croton underscores that every party involved in the design, construction, and management of high-rise buildings must bear responsibility for their actions and decisions. “Taking responsibility saves lives and contributes to a happier and safer built environment. Neglecting this crucial aspect can have severe consequences,” the article warns.

A new era of fire safety regulation

In the wake of the Grenfell disaster, new fire safety guidance will be implemented from October 1, 2023, increasing the industry’s responsibilities. The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) strengthens fire safety by enhancing cooperation, increasing record-keeping requirements, and empowering enforcement authorities to deal more effectively with non-compliance.

Croton’s concluding note implores the industry and all stakeholders to learn from the past, emphasising that the Building Safety Act is a catalyst for change: “It is now our collective responsibility to ensure that legacy issues are resolved, new buildings are designed and constructed around the test evidence available, and tragedy never again defines our pursuit of safety, justice, and compassion.”

To read the full article, click here: Building a Better Future: The Crucial Role of Responsibility in Construction.

UK launches £18.6m Waking Watch Replacement Fund

The UK government has announced a new £18.6 million Waking Watch Replacement Fund for the current year. The fund aims to cover the costs of installing common alarm systems in residential buildings throughout England, wherever a Waking Watch is currently in operation.

This funding builds upon the efforts of the £35 million Waking Watch Relief Fund (WWRF), launched with a focus on high-rise residential buildings above 17.7 metres with a Waking Watch, and the £27 million Waking Watch Replacement Fund from 2022, which broadened its scope to include residential buildings of any height.

The newly announced £18.6 million funding seeks to further expand financial support and adheres to the guidance given by the National Fire Chief’s Council (NFCC). It is particularly intended for buildings that shift from a ‘Stay Put’ to a ‘Simultaneous Evacuation’ fire safety strategy.

Applications to the fund opened on the day of the announcement, with full application guidance and an application form available to prospective applicants. The DLUHC personal information charter and privacy notice lay out the use of personal information during the application process.

Leaseholders, who may have encountered high costs or delays in implementing interim safety measures, will directly benefit from this fund. It aims to provide financial support and facilitate a more efficient, long-term fire safety system in their buildings.

Funding eligibility

To qualify for funding, a building must be in England, serve as a residential building, and have a Waking Watch in place. The fund will cover the upfront costs of installing an alarm system in accordance with the recommendations of BS 5839-1 for a Category L5 system, as referred to in the NFCC’s revised guidance on simultaneous evacuation.

Retroactive costs will also be considered, with the fund covering the cost of alarms where installation work began on or after 25 May 2023.

The fund will be administered centrally by the DLUHC for all qualifying buildings. Previous applicants to the 2021 Waking Watch Relief Fund and the 2022 Waking Watch Replacement Fund can find additional information and guidance on the associated prospectus and application guidance documents.

Regulator of Social Housing finds serious failings at Birmingham City Council

Birmingham City Council has been found to have violated consumer standards, according to a report issued by the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH). The regulatory notice came as a result of an investigation revealing severe health and safety issues in approximately 23,000 social homes under the council’s ownership.

The investigation unearthed an alarming list of unmet safety inspections and overdue risk assessments. Among these were nearly 17,000 overdue asbestos surveys, around 15,500 late electrical safety inspections, and over 1,000 overdue fire risk assessments, primarily concerning low-rise housing blocks. These oversights have left thousands of council tenants at potential risk of serious harm.

Moreover, the report highlighted a striking lack of efficiency in handling tenant complaints, with over 1,000 responses yet to be addressed. This issue is coupled with earlier external reviews indicating that the council’s engagement with tenants has been ineffective, with a clear lack of understanding or prioritization of tenants’ needs.

In response to these findings, the regulator has urged Birmingham City Council to promptly rectify these failings and ensure compliance with consumer standards.

Commenting on the issue, Kate Dodsworth, Director of Consumer Regulation at RSH, expressed her concerns: “

Birmingham City Council has failed thousands of tenants and it needs to act now to put things right. It is unacceptable that so many of its tenants are living in non-decent homes, and that thousands of health and safety surveys haven’t been completed. The council also needs to improve the way it handles its tenants’ complaints. We will continue to monitor the council’s progress while it fixes the problems we found through our investigation.

Building Safety Regulator initiates high-rise registration process

The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has announced that the registration process for high-rise buildings is well underway, with nearly 750 applications already opened since its commencement last month.

The new regulatory regime necessitates all high-rise residential buildings to be registered with the BSR, as mandated by law. Those responsible for buildings have until the end of September to register their properties, or risk facing prosecution.

Although the BSR acknowledges the positive early response from the building industry, it continues to encourage all property owners and managers to act promptly. Up to 12,500 buildings in England fall under the purview of the BSR, an independent entity established in response to the Grenfell Fire tragedy and officially launched earlier this year.

The inception of the BSR, facilitated by the Building Safety Act 2022 and operating under the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), marks a significant shift in building safety regulations, the most impactful for a generation.

Strongly encouraged

Philip White, HSE’s Director of Building Safety, commented:

“We’re pleased with the early response from industry but I urge owners and managers to act now and register their buildings if they haven’t already done so. This is a legal requirement they will have to meet by the end of September. Registration is a crucial part of the new regime and our efforts to ensure residents of high-rise buildings feel protected and safe in their homes.”

Buildings required to register with the BSR include high-rise residential structures that are at least 18 metres in height or have seven or more floors containing a minimum of two residential units.

Comprehensive information regarding the registration process and required details can be found on the BSR’s website. Building owners or managers are expected to provide data such as the number of floors at or above ground level, height in metres, the number of residential units, and the year of construction.

The BSR has also published guidance on the key building information (KBI) that will be required under the new building safety laws. This KBI registration element will be incorporated into the high-rise building (HRB) online registration portal later this summer, providing ample time for building owners and managers to submit their KBI by the September deadline.

Society of Fire Protection Engineers sponsors Building Safety Month


The Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) has announced its sponsorship of Building Safety Month, a worldwide campaign presented by the International Code Council aimed at promoting building safety.

Taking place in May 2023, the campaign raises awareness of the need to ensure safety in the buildings in which we live, work, and learn, making the connection between building codes and personal safety, and highlighting the important work of building safety professionals in communities worldwide.

From SFPE’s fire protection engineering standards, to the annual SFPE P.E. exam review course, to countless technical articles, handbooks, education programs, and more, SFPE ensures that fire protection engineers have the knowledge to advance building safety and engineer a fire-safe world.

“SFPE’s global community of members, chapters, and fire protection engineers works to continuously advance the scientific understanding and engineering principles of fire,” said Kevin Mlutkowski, CAE, Director of Community Engagement, Marketing, and Communications at SFPE. “This month during Building Safety Month, SFPE is proud to partner with the International Code Council in showcasing the roles, competencies, and life-saving work of fire protection engineers.”

To learn more about Building Safety Month, search #BuildingSafetyMonth2023 #BuildingSafety365 or visit www.iccsafe.org. To learn more about SFPE and the Society’s programs to engineer a fire-safe world, visit www.sfpe.org.

About SFPE

Engineering a fire-safe world since 1950. Headquartered near Washington, DC, and in Brussels, BE, the Society of Fire Protection Engineers is the world’s leading professional society for fire protection and fire safety engineering.

IFSJ Exclusive: What can we learn from the Notre-Dame fire?

Steve Emery, Chair of the IFE Special Interest Group for Heritage Buildings, looks at what we have learned about fire since the 2019 Notre-Dame disaster

Global professional body, The Institution of Fire Engineers, has 10 Special Interest Groups (SIGs) that examine intricate subject areas of fire engineering. The Heritage Buildings SIG was set up by IFE member, Steve Emery, in 2008 whilst he was Fire Officer for English Heritage, and subsequently Historic England. Emery has also been employed as Oxford University’s Fire Officer, as well as boasting a 30-year career at Avon Fire Brigade, the last 12 years of which he served as Fire Officer for Bath – a World Heritage Site for its many listed buildings.

As a fire engineer with a specialty in heritage buildings, it was natural that Emery became interested in the catastrophic Notre-Dame fire which decimated one of Paris’ most historic landmarks. Iain Hoey, IFSJ Editor, caught up with Emery for the fourth anniversary of the Notre-Dame fire to find out what caused its collapse and how cathedrals and other heritage sites can avoid a similar fate.

When did you become interested in Notre-Dame?

I was a matter of interest for me because the vaults collapsed, and I wanted to know why. Traditionally, there will be a collapse if you have a point load on one side of the vault: it weakens that side and the other side collapses on it in on it. Alternative, the conoid – where the vault joins the walls – fills up with water and you have an imbalance. Before the fire, everything was in equilibrium: the walls were standing, the vaults were intact. Something happened to put it out of equilibrium. I wondered if the heat of the fire could have affected the limestone in such a way that it was weakened.

Can you explain the structure of Notre-Dame and similar heritage sites?

As part of Oxford University, we employed an intern for two weeks: Claire Ballantine – a postgraduate students from the School of Geography who investigated what stones the English cathedrals were built of, where the stones came from, and whether the quarries were still open.

Ballatine carried out a scoping study, testing four types of limestone in a furnace, including chalk – chalk limestone is much lighter than other limestone, and so it has been used for vaulting in heritage buildings. The problem with chalk is that it becomes soggy when it gets wet. We already knew that when the limestone is heated, it gives off ferric oxide which makes it more porous. When limestone gains porosity it loses its strength.

I started to look into how the vaults were staying up. Essentially, vaults are pushing against the walls, and the walls are stopping the vault from spreading by either having flying buttresses or being buttresses themselves. The Notre-Dame vaulting system is sexpartite. From the crown of the arch down to where it joins the wall is five metres, which is a tremendous depth.

How does a collapse occur?

If you’ve got flying buttresses and the vault collapses, then the flying buttress is trying to push the walls in. If, because of the collapse, the timbers have fallen to the floor, the radiated heat from that pile of roof timbers that is now the floor is then radiating heat onto the pillars on each side, which are holding the roof up.

The flying buttresses at the top are pushing the wall in. Meanwhile you’ve weakened the wall at ground floor level. There is then a real danger not just of having a vault collapse, but the whole wall collapsing. The more vaults that collapse, the worse the situation is.

If you’ve got a solid buttress that is on a firm foundation, when you take the vaulting away it is self-supporting and stays upright. It is only a problem when you’ve got flying buttresses.

In the early days after the fire at Notre-Dame, there was a real danger of the walls collapsing. After a while they managed to put some wooden supports underneath the flying buttresses to keep them up so they don’t push the walls.

How are the columns which support buildings affected during a fire?

The outside of the column, whether it’s decorative or smooth, is ashlar. It is a finished stone which is around four inches thick. The inside of the column is filled with rough limestone i.e. chunks of limestone, with a lime mortar. Over the years, with vibration from e.g. lorries and trains, the lime mortar becomes loose, then it starts to fall down. You end up with cracks inside the pillar and eventually all you’ve got is the outer skin of the pillar holding the weight of the roof up. When heat is impacting the columns and weakening it by making it more porous, the four inches outer skin is being eroded.

What happens in a fire when the roof falls in?

It is critical that you can keep the roof intact so that timbers is not falling down to the floor and spreading the fire. You ideally want to separate the high fire load of the roof from the low fire load in the rest of cathedral. Otherwise, you will have molten lead from the roof falling down onto firefighters below, which is a real danger as it will go straight through a helmet.

If a vault collapses, it introduces fresh air underneath the fire which is then turning a fire that might only be 600 degrees essentially into a forge where you pump air in underneath and the heat increases rapidly.  

In July 2021, the city of Paris was sued for lead contamination from Notre-Dame. For that to have happened, the temperature in the cathedral roof must have reached that where molten lead becomes vaporised. That is 1,700 degrees. The fire vapourised the lead which went up with the smoke. It then turned into dust as it cooled, the dust then fell onto the streets outside, heavily contaminating the tarmac.

How can we prevent fires in heritage buildings?

There haven’t been many cathedral fires in the world – we’ve only lost or had roof fires 69 times in the last 1000 years according to historical records.

We do, however, need to be careful about the presence of contractors carrying out restorative work. Many of these buildings have stood for over 600 years or more, but if you bring in hot works, or cold works such as the use of disc cutters, this creates a fire risk. All contractors – including for cold works – should have a hot works permit.

If somebody is carrying out hot work on the outside of a building, for example patching the lead roof, you need somebody inside that can access the risk area. Ideally, there should be a method being able to get water to any fire risk area via a system of ladders or internal scaffolding.

If an event a fire does happen, how should it be tackled?

Having information about the building is the number one priority for all fire rescue teams. They should have site specific risk information at the ready. They need to be aware of access to the roof. Most cathedrals had dry risers put in in the 1950s post-war after the use of incendiary bombs, but they’re not always in the best place.

If you took Bath Abbey, for example, the spiral staircases are at the east and west of the church, meaning they don’t go up in the central crossing and there’s nothing to allow access in the crossing, which is where the dry riser is. In this case, if firefighters will need to use the spiral stairs to get onto the roof, meaning they will be going across the burning roof before they can plug the hoses into the dry riser, which is not practical.

Canterbury Cathedral has had its roofs compartmented. They cut a hole in the roof to install a water mist system which – water mist is a practical solution as it reduces the risk of flooding. The only downside to it is the hole that has been made may does not allow them to look into the roof, so they might be directing the water mist at something that is not on fire.

Finally, built into most cathedrals ­but not all – at the bottom of the conoids is a scupper: a hole that goes through the outside wall to drain the water away. Fire teams also need to know whether the water that you’re putting on is going to leave and not flood, creating imbalance and causing the vaults to collapse.

With almost 12,000 members, the IFE continues to promote, encourage, and improve the science, practice and professionalism of fire engineering, acting as a beacon of established expertise and guiding the way to a fire safe future.

For more info on the IFE, visit their website for further information.

More than 900 affected by Grenfell settle claims

More than 900 people affected by the Grenfell Tower fire have reportedly agreed a settlement of civil claims.

The fire, which occurred almost six years ago on 14 June 2017, claimed the lives of 72 people and displaced hundreds more.

The victims and their families have been seeking compensation for the losses and damages they incurred as a result of the tragedy.

According to the lawyers, the compensation to be received by the 900 claimants is to be distributed based on their specific circumstances. However, not all victims of the fire are included in the settlement.

The settlement is said to include compensation for the victims and their families, as well as funding for community projects and improvements to fire safety measures in the area.

The settlement was welcomed by the victims and their families, who have been fighting for justice and accountability since the tragedy occurred.

The Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO), which was appointed by the local council to manage its housing stock, acknowledged that a “monetary settlement cannot compensate for the loss and trauma” experienced by those affected by the Grenfell Tower fire. However, the spokesperson welcomed the settlement as a move towards providing justice for the affected individuals.

The cladding giant Arconic said it was among the firms that were involved in the high court case and had agreed to the settlement. A spokesman for Arconic said: “Arconic continues to express its deepest sympathy to the Grenfell residents and their families, and appreciates the importance of this milestone for providing a resolution that lessens the delay and stress to claimants that would result from protracted legal proceedings.”

Gove vows to make Arconic pay for their role in building safety crisis

On March 29th, 2023, a letter from Michael Gove (published on Twitter) was sent to Arconic, urging the company to acknowledge their role in the use of flammable cladding and insulation products. The letter stated that those who manufactured and sold these products have a moral and financial obligation to contribute to the remediation costs for unsafe buildings in the United Kingdom.

The letter specifically addressed Arconic, highlighting their lack of engagement in industry-wide negotiations that took place in 2022 and the fact that they have not contributed any funding towards the cost of fixing dangerous buildings.

Gove’s letter expressed his disappointment in Arconic’s failure to engage in any meaningful way and noted the company’s spending on legal advice and representation on Grenfell-related matters between 2017 and 2022. The letter invited Arconic to meet with officials to explain how they intend to scope, identify and pay for remediation works.

Gove also mentioned the steps taken by other companies, such as Kingspan and Saint-Gobain, to acknowledge their responsibility and role in paying for remediation. He stressed the importance of a comprehensive package of financial support from construction product manufacturers to restore confidence in the sector and protect people in their homes.

The letter concluded with a deadline of April 12th for Arconic to respond to the request for engagement. Gove emphasised that his department will continue to be driven solely by their commitment to protect people in their homes and that those companies that do not share this commitment must expect to face commercial consequences.

The use of flammable cladding and insulation products was a contributing factor to the Grenfell Tower tragedy in 2017, which claimed the lives of 72 people. The aftermath of the tragedy revealed an industry-wide disregard for the safety of residents in their homes, and the UK government has been working to address the issue ever since.

New fire safety guidance comes into force on 1 October 2023 in UK

New fire safety guidance, which includes the requirements for fire risk assessments, will come into force on October 1, 2023 in the UK.

The new guidance, called the Building Safety Bill, will replace the current regime established by the Fire Safety Order 2005. The Building Safety Bill is part of the UK government’s reform program in response to the Grenfell Tower fire.

The new legislation aims to strengthen fire safety in high-rise buildings, and to ensure that residents and owners are kept informed about building safety risks. The new guidance also aims to improve the regulation of building safety across the country.

The Building Safety Bill will require the responsible person to appoint a competent person to carry out fire risk assessments in high-rise buildings. The responsible person will also be required to provide information about the building’s construction and maintenance, as well as any safety measures and equipment in place.

The new legislation will also require owners and residents to provide information about their occupancy of the building, and to report any changes that may affect fire safety.

The Building Safety Bill will introduce a new safety assurance regime, which will require building owners and managers to assess and manage the safety risks of their buildings.

The safety assurance regime will also require owners and managers to take appropriate measures to mitigate any risks identified. In addition, the Bill will provide for more stringent requirements for building safety during construction and refurbishment projects, and will strengthen the powers of regulators to enforce safety standards.

The new guidance also includes the introduction of a new Building Safety Regulator, which will be responsible for implementing and enforcing the new safety regime.

The Building Safety Regulator will have powers to impose penalties on building owners and managers who fail to comply with the new safety requirements, and to take enforcement action against those who breach the regulations.