East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service signs £11 million technology partnership with Telent

Telent agreement with ESFRS

East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service (ESFRS) has agreed a five-year, £11 million partnership with Telent to support the next phase of its digital transformation programme.

The partnership will cover technology supporting operational response and emergency communications, alongside IT services including critical networks, line of business applications and user devices.

Under the agreement, Telent will act as principal partner as ESFRS moves from a co-located data centre to a cloud-first environment within Microsoft Azure and application vendor provided cloud services.

Kev Pilkington, Head of IT Managed Services at Telent, said: “This contract award demonstrates that long-term transformation is possible when technology partners truly understand their customers’ mission and work collaboratively to achieve it.

“By keeping vital IT systems running 24/7, we help ensure that East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service can focus entirely on what matters most that is protecting lives, property and the communities they serve.”

Cloud-first scope and service resilience

The programme is intended to make critical systems faster, more reliable and more connected, with a focus on maintaining consistent emergency response.

Justine Cadogan, Assistant Director Digital, Technology & Change at ESFRS, said: “Our technology systems are central to how we serve and protect our communities.

“Continuing our partnership with Telent gives us the confidence that our digital infrastructure will remain secure, reliable and fit for the future, supporting our firefighters and staff in delivering the best possible service for the communities of East Sussex.”

The statement said the enhanced infrastructure will strengthen cybersecurity, improve performance and data access and streamline information-sharing across teams.

The agreement also includes co-developing ESFRS’s future IT strategy, with work to consider opportunities in automation and predictive analytics to support planning, coordination and resource management across the Service.

Work delivered since 2016

The award follows a public procurement process and builds on a nine-year partnership between the organisations, dating back to 2016.

The statement said Telent has modernised ESFRS’s IT infrastructure, migrated legacy systems and provided round-the-clock managed services across more than 75 IT service categories.

These categories include station end mobilisation, wired and Wi-Fi network management and end-user support for stations and front-line crews.

It also includes digitising previously manual and paper-based processes for fire safety visits, including a tablet-based application for Site Specific Risk Information visits.

Barry Zielinski, Strategy & Development Director for Network Services at Telent, said: “From an operational perspective, this award ensures our teams can continue providing the dependable, secure infrastructure that the Service’s front-line staff rely on every day.

“Whether it’s maintaining seamless communication between control rooms and crews or ensuring systems are always online, our focus is on enabling ESFRS to continue to deliver a fast, coordinated response across every incident as well as supporting the essential prevention work reducing the need for operational response.”

Euralarm fact sheet explains Cyber Resilience Act product classification for fire safety manufacturers

Euralarm fact sheet on CRA categories

A new fact sheet sets out how electronic fire safety and security products are classified under the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), published in November 2024.

Euralarm said the document is intended to help manufacturers understand categorisation and conformity assessment obligations before products can be placed on the EU market.

The fact sheet describes the CRA product categories as “default,” Important Class I, Important Class II, and Critical.

It explains that the essential cybersecurity requirements apply equally to all in-scope products with digital elements.

It also explains that Important and Critical products are subject to stricter conformity assessment procedures.

The document sets out why correct categorisation matters for deciding whether self-assessment is permitted or whether a notified body is required.

Examples used to classify fire safety and security products

In the fact sheet, Euralarm provides structured examples focused on electronic fire safety and security products where interpretation can raise practical questions.

The examples include smart home products with security functionalities, identity management systems and privileged access management products, and hardware devices with security boxes.

The document also uses examples including intrusion detection systems, fire detection control panels, access control systems, biometric readers, and cloud-based alarm management software.

It explains when a product’s core functionality determines its categorisation.

It states that most electronic fire safety and physical security products are expected to fall within the “default” category and may rely on self-assessment where compliance with the CRA essential requirements can be demonstrated.

It also states that embedding security-related components such as microcontrollers with security functions or cryptographic capabilities does not automatically make a product “Important” or “Critical” where its core functionality does not meet the criteria defined in the Implementing Regulation.

Standards and conformity assessment routes

Euralarm noted that future harmonised standards under development may support manufacturers in demonstrating conformity under the CRA.

The fact sheet references EN 62443-4-x and other horizontal standards as examples that may support presumption of conformity where applicable.

The publication is presented as part of Euralarm’s ongoing work to support the fire safety and security industry in adapting to European regulatory requirements.

Firefighting UAV swarm study outlines AI inspection and cyber defence approach

UAV swarm design for firefighting missions

A peer reviewed paper describes a six-drone UAV swarm framework for firefighting operations that aims to maintain mission continuity while reducing exposure to cyberattacks on inter-drone communications.

The study is titled “A Cyber-Resilient UAV Swarm Framework for Fire-Fighting with AI-Based In-Flight Defect Inspection”, authored by Ahad Alotaibi and Abdullah Alrasheedi of the Department of Advanced Technology, Canadian College of Kuwait, Al Jahra, Kuwait, and published in the Journal of Computer and Communications, Vol.14 No.1 (January 2026).

The proposed architecture uses five operational drones assigned mission roles such as thermal observation, environmental sensing, close-range visual assessment, payload support and communications extension.

It also adds one Inspector/Commander drone positioned to supervise, capture inspection imagery and act as a coordination node linking the swarm to the Ground Control Station (GCS).

The paper frames the approach around two risk areas in swarm missions, physical degradation in fire-ground environments and cyber threats exploiting wireless coordination traffic.

AI inspection and cyber-resilient communications approach

The framework includes a mobile application called Drone Inspector that manages pre-processing, cloud submission and alerting for in-flight defect inspection imagery.

The workflow described has the Inspector/Commander UAV capturing high-resolution images of neighbouring operational drones at defined intervals and sending them through the swarm communications layer to the Drone Inspector application.

The application then submits images to Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels via API and receives defect labels with confidence scores.

The paper describes defect categories including exposed wiring, landing gear damage, landing gear misalignment and deformation of landing components.

Inspection frequency is described as adaptive, with inspections every two minutes under nominal conditions and every 30 seconds in higher risk areas linked to gas sensor readings indicating proximity to an active fire zone.

In the implementation described, the application triggers a critical alert to the Ground Control Station when confidence exceeds a defined threshold, with the paper describing a threshold of 80%.

For communications security, the paper proposes subnet segmentation and Route Optimization for Autonomous Systems (ROAS) to reduce the feasibility of Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) and traffic manipulation attacks.

Subnet segmentation is described as dividing the swarm network into role-based subnetworks with routing policies controlling inter-subnet communication.

ROAS is described as a dynamic routing approach intended to adjust paths based on network conditions and topology changes to reduce persistent interception points.

Evaluation approach and reported results

The paper describes evaluation across physical deployment feasibility, AI inspection workflow performance and cybersecurity simulation.

It describes a six-UAV deployment consistent with the proposed architecture, with the Inspector/Commander UAV maintaining a supervisory position to capture imagery and support communication.

Example UAV platforms named include DJI Matrice series platforms and an Autel EVO Max model, with additional roles described for payload delivery and communications relay.

Live fire was not used for safety reasons.

The paper describes using manoeuvres, formation flight and environmental stressors such as wind variability to emulate operational challenges relevant to emergency response.

For AI defect detection, it describes Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels trained on a labelled dataset including normal conditions and representative defect scenarios, with reported classification metrics including precision, recall and F1-score.

For cybersecurity simulation, it describes a network emulation environment built in GNS3, using a Kali Linux attacker node and Ettercap for adversarial traffic injection, with a comparison between a baseline flat network and a secured configuration applying segmentation and ROAS.

The paper references EtherApe traffic visualisation and describes figures intended to show traffic concentration through the attacker node under baseline conditions, followed by more balanced traffic patterns after defences are applied.

Across these experiments, the authors report reduced attack success rates, early detection of defects and improved operational reliability within the combined inspection and network defence framework.

The paper presents the system as a hierarchical swarm design that links physical integrity monitoring and cybersecurity measures within a single operational framework.