Planning properly for every person: Evac+Chair highlights the need for inclusive evacuation planning and ongoing training

by Breaking NewsBuilding ManagementHealth and SafetySafety

Evac+Chair outlines inclusive, compliant evacuation planning and the critical role of training and maintenance

For over 40 years, Evac+Chair has played a pivotal role in shaping how organisations approach emergency evacuation.

As the world’s leading manufacturer of evacuation chairs, the company is synonymous with inclusive fire safety.

Its instantly recognisable yellow and blue chairs can be found in thousands of buildings across the UK and globally, offering vital peace of mind for businesses and the public alike.

Founded in 1982, Evac+Chair began with a singular goal: to ensure that no one is left behind during an emergency evacuation.

Today, that mission continues through a holistic approach encompassing product innovation, comprehensive training and meticulous maintenance programmes – all underpinned by a proficient understanding of the regulatory landscape and the real-life risks that businesses face.

In today’s evolving working environment, shaped by climate change, terrorism, fires and other emergencies, organisations must have robust emergency plans that include both evacuation and invacuation procedures.

Evacuation involves safely moving people out of a building, while invacuation means guiding them to a secure internal location when external threats make it unsafe to leave.

To ensure everyone’s safety, organisations must have clear protocols, the right equipment, staff training and regular emergency drills.

Navigating a complex legal framework

UK fire safety legislation is among the most comprehensive in the world.

The cornerstone is the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety Order) 2005, amended by the Fire Safety Act 2021.

It places clear legal duties on the “responsible person”, typically a business owner or property manager, to ensure provisions are in place to evacuate.

In addition, Article 17 of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety Order) 2005 requires that fire safety devices, including evacuation equipment, are maintained in good working order.

Articles 18 and 21 further detail and emphasise the importance of appointing competent individuals and providing regular training for staff.

However, enforcement data suggests a worrying disconnect between legislation and implementation.

The Home Office Official Statistics on Fire Prevention and Protection, in the UK, found that in the 2023/24 financial year, fire and rescue services issued 2,823 formal notices following unsatisfactory fire safety audits – a 24% increase on the previous year.

Prosecutions under Article 32, which penalises the failure to maintain life-saving equipment, rose by 79%.

Beyond fire legislation, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 imposes a general duty of care on employers to protect the safety of staff and visitors.

The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) 1998 go further, explicitly requiring that all workplace equipment is regularly inspected and maintained.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has acted decisively in recent years, prosecuting nearly 10% of PUWER-related breaches.

Failures typically stem from a lack of training or inadequate maintenance, both of which can have fatal consequences in an emergency.

The lack of readiness

Despite the regulatory clarity, Evac+Chair’s own research indicates significant gaps in preparedness.

The company’s independent study titled the ‘Risky Business’ report in 2023, which surveyed key decision-makers across multiple sectors, found that 22% had only a partial understanding of their legal evacuation responsibilities.

The study also revealed a lack of foresight in planning for temporary impairments.

19% of organisations failed to include staff or visitors with temporary mobility issues such as someone who is on crutches or someone in the late stages of pregnancy, in their evacuation plans.

Perhaps most concerning, one in ten businesses acknowledged having no strategy in place to evacuate people with permanent mobility impairments.

These findings underline a systemic issue: equipment alone is not enough.

Without trained personnel and regular practice, even the best evacuation solutions can fall short in high-pressure scenarios.

Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) and General Emergency Evacuation Plans (GEEPs) are critical tools in ensuring the safety of individuals with varying mobility needs.

Failure to implement these plans effectively not only puts lives at risk but may also carry serious legal implications for organisations under equality and health and safety legislation.

Regular practice, comprehensive training and clear evacuation procedures make emergency evacuations more efficient and significantly safer for both the passenger and the operator.

It’s not just about compliance; it’s about doing the right thing to protect every individual in an emergency situation.

Building confidence through training

Evac+Chair’s comprehensive training programmes instill confidence in users, ensuring they are prepared not just in principle but in practice.

The most widely adopted course, especially for larger organisations, the Key Trainer Course offers a sustainable solution by enabling internal teams to deliver this vital training themselves.

This four-hour session teaches how to cascade the training and certify others and what to look out for to ensure someone is competent.

There is also the Operator Training Course, which runs for two and a half hours and blends essential theory with hands-on experience.

Delegates learn how to operate the Evac+Chair correctly and safely during stairwell evacuations where time is limited and every second counts.

Correct operation is crucial, not only for the safety of the passenger but also for the wellbeing of the operator.

Certification is valid for three years, providing organisations with documented evidence of compliance, while helping maintain high standards of emergency readiness.

Regular training is essential to keeping skills refreshed, this improves the efficiency of an evacuation and avoids injury to the operator or the passenger in preparation for a real emergency.

These sessions align with guidance from the Fire Safety Risk Assessment Supplementary Guide, which recommends evacuation drills at least twice a year.

Ultimately, it’s not just about compliance, it’s about being ready to respond quickly, confidently and safely when it matters most.

Maintenance: a non-negotiable priority

An Evac+Chair is classified as a Class I Medical Device and, as such, is subject to stringent maintenance requirements under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) 1998.

Regular servicing is not just a recommendation – it’s a legal and operational necessity.

To ensure continued reliability, Evac+Chair recommend maintenance should only be carried out by certified engineers using genuine parts.

Evac+Chair’s annual service programme includes a thorough inspection and the replacement of any worn or damaged components, such as belts, buckles and wheels, guaranteeing that each unit remains fully operational and ready to perform flawlessly in an emergency.

Regular maintenance also helps to extend the product’s lifetime, providing long-term value whilst safeguarding the wellbeing of both passengers and operators.

Evac+Chair offers service contracts ranging from one to five years, giving organisations the flexibility to plan their budgets while remaining fully compliant.

The company also recommends quarterly visual checks by in-house teams, helping to spot signs of wear or damage before they escalate into serious issues.

The importance of proactive maintenance cannot be overstated.

During an evacuation, a faulty Evac+Chair could cost precious minutes – or worse, lives.

By investing in routine servicing, organisations demonstrate both legal compliance and a moral commitment to the wellbeing of everyone on their premises.

The human cost of inaction

While the legal risks are considerable, moral obligation is equally strong.

Failing to provide evacuation procedures for people with mobility impairments is not only a breach of duty; it is a denial of basic human rights.

Evac+Chair’s range of evacuation chairs are used daily in premises across the globe.

They are often the difference between inclusion and exclusion, between a safe evacuation and an avoidable tragedy.

Whenever there is a set of stairs, there should be the means to escape.

No building should be considered fully accessible unless it includes a viable evacuation solution for all individuals, regardless of mobility.

Providing an Evac+Chair is not just about meeting compliance standards; it’s about ensuring dignity, equality and safety for everyone in an emergency.

As Nathaniel Thomas-Hall, Head of Export and Innovation at Evac+Chair, states, “Failure to prepare is preparing to fail.

We have the tools, technology and training to make inclusive fire safety a reality – what’s missing in many cases is the will to act before it’s too late.”

A call to the fire safety community

Evac+Chair believes that the fire safety community has a vital role to play in bridging the current compliance gap.

Fire professionals, consultants, and enforcement officers must continue to raise awareness about the critical importance of evacuation readiness.

This includes championing not just the installation of evacuation chairs but their ongoing use, upkeep and the skills development that surrounds them.

The company is also calling on policymakers to introduce clearer mandates around evacuation planning for mobility-impaired individuals.

As buildings become more complex and diverse in use, evacuation strategies must keep pace, particularly as societies move toward greater inclusion and accessibility.

Businesses can no longer afford to treat evacuation planning as a tick-box exercise.

The combination of robust equipment, professional training and diligent maintenance is the only way to ensure readiness when seconds count.

Evac+Chair has led the change in emergency evacuation for over 40 years, but the responsibility for preparedness lies with every organisation.

With the right systems and mindset, inclusive evacuation can be both a legal certainty and a moral standard.

The message is clear: evacuation planning is not optional, and neither is inclusivity.

It is time to ensure that every person, regardless of mobility, has a safe route out when the alarm sounds.

This was originally published in the June 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here. 

Fire alarm guidance released for UK school lockdown use

by Associations and OrganisationsFire DetectionResearchSafetyTraining

Fire alarm systems may support both evacuation and invacuation procedures

The Fire Industry Association (FIA) has published updated guidance on using fire alarm systems to support lockdown and invacuation alerts in schools.

According to the FIA, the guidance responds to increasing interest in adapting fire detection and alarm systems for use during non-fire emergencies, including security incidents and chemical threats.

The note outlines key considerations for implementing this dual use, referring to British Standard BS 5839-1:2025 for compliance requirements.

The FIA stated that many public buildings, particularly schools, are assessing how their current alarm infrastructure can be extended to address a broader range of risks.

BS 5839-1:2025 guidance on dual alarm functionality

The guidance references Clause 5a of BS 5839-1:2025, which states that alarm systems linked to hazards other than fire must be clearly differentiated and coordinated.

The FIA explained that this requirement applies when a single fire alarm system is also used to signal lockdown alerts, which must sound different from standard fire evacuation signals.

It added that systems must be designed to prevent conflicting messages, especially in cases where different emergencies occur at the same time.

The FIA noted that in certain scenarios, such as a violent intruder on school grounds, invacuation may be given higher operational priority than evacuation.

Benefits and limitations of using fire alarm systems for lockdown

The guidance outlines several practical advantages for schools considering this dual-function use.

The FIA stated that combining lockdown alerts with existing fire alarm infrastructure can be more cost-effective than installing separate systems.

It also pointed out that fire detection and alarm systems are typically engineered for high reliability and site-wide coverage, making them suitable for time-sensitive alerts.

However, it cautioned that any adaptation must be supported by a building-specific risk assessment, technical planning, and collaboration with emergency services and installers.

Key operational considerations for schools

The FIA advised that any decision to use fire alarm systems for lockdown purposes should involve clear planning and consultation with relevant stakeholders.

It stressed that distinct alarm tones must be agreed upon and easily recognisable to avoid confusion between evacuation and lockdown instructions.

The organisation also recommended establishing procedures to manage simultaneous or conflicting emergency alerts, especially where multiple risks are present.

It emphasised the importance of ensuring that all staff understand the protocols and that decisions about alarm hierarchy are documented and agreed in advance.

Fire alarm guidance released for UK school lockdown use: Summary

The Fire Industry Association released updated guidance on 3 June 2025.

The guidance addresses using fire alarm systems for lockdown and invacuation alerts in schools.

It refers to BS 5839-1:2025 Clause 5a, which requires alarms to be distinct and coordinated.

The FIA stated that many schools are exploring this dual use due to rising safety concerns.

It noted that combining functions may reduce costs and improve system reliability.

It cautioned that lockdown alarms must be clearly differentiated from fire alarms.

The organisation said a full risk assessment must guide implementation.

It recommended stakeholder collaboration to ensure clarity and compliance.

It stated that some scenarios may prioritise invacuation over evacuation.

The FIA advised that building-specific protocols should be developed.

It concluded that schools must prepare operational responses to overlapping emergencies.

Wildfire evacuations surge across Canada as air quality worsens

by Americas - Breaking NewsBreaking NewsWildland Fire

Mass evacuations in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta

More than 25,000 people have been evacuated across Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta as wildfires continue to burn across central Canada, according to news reports.

Manitoba has declared a state of emergency, with Premier Wab Kinew confirming that 17,000 residents have already been evacuated.

Kinew said entire communities have been relocated, including Flin Flon, where only firefighters and emergency officials remain.

About 8,000 residents have also fled from Saskatchewan, with 1,300 people evacuated in Alberta.

The Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency said that visibility and air quality remain volatile: “Air quality and visibility due to wildfire smoke can fluctuate over short distances and can vary considerably from hour to hour.”

US air quality affected by Canadian wildfires

The US Environmental Protection Agency reported unhealthy air quality levels in parts of North Dakota, Montana, Minnesota and South Dakota due to smoke drift from Canadian wildfires.

The National Weather Service meteorologist Bryan Jackson said: “We should expect at least a couple more rounds of Canadian smoke to come through the US over the next week.”

Air quality alerts have been issued as far south as Chicago and Washington DC.

The US Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service said on 31 May that an air tanker had been deployed to Alberta.

It confirmed that 150 firefighters and additional equipment were also being sent to support Canadian efforts.

Crews face difficult firefighting conditions

Dry conditions, gusting winds and limited visibility have made fire suppression efforts difficult, according to provincial agencies.

Premier Scott Moe of Saskatchewan said: “The next four to seven days are absolutely critical until we can find our way to changing weather patterns, and ultimately a soaking rain throughout the north.”

Steve Roberts from the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency told reporters on 30 May that wind-driven fire spread was affecting containment operations.

The fire threatening Flin Flon began near Creighton, Saskatchewan, and crossed the Manitoba border earlier in the week.

Flin Flon Mayor George Fontaine said: “Unless we get one heck of a boost, the fire is projected to take chunks out of our town and surrounding areas.”

Thousands sheltered as infrastructure strained

Emergency shelters have opened across Manitoba, with evacuees staying in community centres and public buildings in Winnipeg and surrounding towns.

The Guardian reported that many hotels in receiving cities are already full, as local authorities work to provide alternative shelter.

Grand Chief Kyra Wilson of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs said: “It’s really sad to see our children having to sleep on floors. People are sitting, waiting in hallways, waiting outside.”

The Canadian Armed Forces has been deployed to support evacuation logistics, including airlifting residents from remote communities such as the Mathias Colomb Cree Nation.

Evacuations are also ongoing in other areas, including Swan Hills, Pimicikamak Cree Nation and Cranberry Portage.

Early-season fires raise concern over long-term impact

According to The Guardian, Manitoba wildfires have already burned over 200,000 hectares, approximately three times the province’s recent annual average.

Satellite imagery has shown extreme fire behaviour, including pyrocumulus cloud formation, which can propel smoke into the upper atmosphere.

Natural Resources Canada has reported that fire danger ratings remain at the maximum across much of the affected area.

Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew said: “This is the largest evacuation Manitoba will have seen in most people’s living memory.”

Canadian officials warned that fire seasons in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia are expected to be above average through spring and summer.

Recent health research cited by The Guardian has linked wildfire smoke to adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects, with no safe exposure threshold identified.

Wildfire evacuations across Canada impact air quality in US: Summary

More than 25,000 people have been evacuated in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta.

Manitoba declared a state of emergency.

Flin Flon and other communities have been fully evacuated.

Fires have destroyed infrastructure and forced widespread displacement.

Air quality has deteriorated in parts of the US.

The US is sending 150 firefighters and equipment to Canada.

Firefighting efforts are hampered by wind and dry conditions.

Smoke continues to spread southward across the US.

Shelters have been opened in cities including Winnipeg.

Manitoba Indigenous leaders say accommodation is full.

Canadian Armed Forces are supporting evacuations.

More evacuations are expected in affected regions.

Fire behaviour is described as extreme by experts.

Natural Resources Canada reported maximum fire danger levels.

Wildfire smoke is linked to adverse health effects.

Officials expect above-average fire seasons across multiple provinces.

Fire Drill Best Practices for Elementary, Middle and High Schools

by Featured NewsFire DetectionSafety

Peter Lee explains why age-specific fire drill planning, legal compliance and post-drill review are essential for improving emergency response in K-12 schools

Fire preparedness is an essential element of school safety and regular fire drills are one of the best chances to build readiness throughout a campus.

Even though we all hope for 100% prevention of emergencies, fire drills provide schools with the opportunity to verify students and staff know exactly how to respond when an emergency does occur.

However, not all fire drills should be identical; variables such as age appropriateness should be taken into consideration.

What is appropriate for a high school will not be appropriate for a kindergarten class.

To truly prepare a K-12 campus, the fire drill process must be age appropriate, well thought out, in a proper program and the Right Now Toolkit provides modern support.

Tools to Detect Fire Before It Spreads

The use of early fire detection in a building is a huge advantage before a fire drill is necessary.

Many schools are looking to AI-enabled technologies to identify early warning signs of fire: smoke patterns, sudden temperature spikes, or visual cues—all before the traditional fire alarm has even sounded.

Surveillance systems equipped with artificial intelligence now serve as early warning systems.

These tools alert school administrators the moment something unusual is detected, giving them critical extra minutes to respond.

For example, platforms like Coram AI integrate fire detection alerts with school security workflows, providing early warnings that complement traditional alarm systems and evacuation plans.

By pairing smart detection with well-practiced drills, schools can turn reaction time into a life-saving advantage.

Why Fire Drills Matter in K-12 Schools

Drills for fire aren’t only a formality – they help students and staff take the appropriate action, quickly and clearly, during a fire.

As we know from experience, the more regularly evacuation drills are done the less panic there is, the more orderly the evacuation is and the easier it is for all stakeholders to recognize areas of concern in a school’s emergency response plan.

When actual emergencies occur, indecision can mean lives lost.

Drills create muscle memory and allow everyone to recognize where to go, the safest path to get there and what is likely to happen.

Drills also embed general follow-structure and the calmness to listen to instruction; this is especially helpful for younger students who may be experiencing fear or confusion during emergencies.

Legal Requirements and Compliance

Most states in the U.S.

have legal requirements mandating the frequency and documentation of fire drills in schools.

Public schools are typically required to conduct one drill per month during the academic year.

Private schools often follow similar standards, depending on licensing and accreditation rules.

In addition to regular scheduling, schools must maintain logs of all drills, ensure participation from every student and staff member and follow recognized safety standards like those provided by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).

Compliance isn’t just about checking boxes—it’s about accountability and creating a culture of preparedness.

Core Principles of an Effective Fire Drill

A fire drill worth doing has three important defining qualities: clarity, consistency and reflection.

First, schools need a clear process for communicating during the drill.

There should be no question about what the alarm means when it sounds—everyone should be aware that this is a drill, what to do next and where to go.

Roles and responsibilities need to be clearly articulated.

Teachers need to lead students slowly and calmly outside the building.

Staff members need to check bathrooms and stairwells, as well as chase down those hidden spaces.

Once at the assembly areas, attendance should be taken as efficiently as possible to account for every individual.

Lastly, following the drills, a brief debrief should happen to show what was effective, what can be improved upon and so on.

This cycle of action and adjustment allows every drill to be a learning moment.

Fire Drill Best Practices by Grade Level

Elementary School

Small children can be vulnerable when it comes to fire drills – they typically require more support and supervision.

First, we want to introduce drills to children in the most positive way possible so as not to create undue anxiety.

It is useful to introduce a fire drill using story, picture, or the context of the classroom.

Most students will need time to practice lining up, walking quietly in line, listening to their teachers and just practicing hearing the alarm.

Think first, be a coach, create scenarios where students feel safe and reinforce the expected norm with encouragement not pressure.

Also, younger students may not fully accept the urgency of a response.

It is important to implement the plan on more than one occasion,getting younger students used to the structure or response plan over time.

Middle School

As students begin to take responsibility for their learning, the process can shift.

Educators should explicitly explain the rationale behind drills and involve students more in the process.

Creating small roles for students, like leading a line, or monitoring exits can increase student engagement.

At this stage it is also helpful to introduce different scenarios with students – such as random exit routes or random timing.

These different variations take students beyond simply following instructions and challenge them to think critically on their feet and adapt to the chaos of real life emergencies.

High School

Older students are able to safely take on a big role in safety planning.

When conducting fire drills, there should be more complexity at the Senior and Secondary levels (the complexity of evacuating students from labs, locker rooms, or gyms.).

The fire drills should incorporate rotations across periods so that a variety of students, at least once, can participate in the first group evacuation.

When there are excited, engaged individuals, ask them to support in developing an open safety plan (involving various community members) ahead of time lends itself to developing stronger accountability for safety.

Fire drills should occur purposely at all times of the day, students developers and an open discussion should occur afterward to receive feedback to underscore that fire drills are not to be taken lightly.

Planning and Executing Fire Drills Efficiently

Well-planned-fire drills are effective fire drills.

When planning, schools should conduct drills at different times during the day.

Consider doing these drills at class changes, lunch and recess to maximize the realistic practice schools are trying to achieve.

It’s always a good idea to have staff briefed ahead of time…especially if routes or procedures have changed!

Working with local fire department crews can provide a useful element of realism or support.

Firefighters can review site layouts with schools, watch drills and provide inputs to enhance overall safety planning.

Coordination tools like PA systems, radios, or apps will help staff communicate better in drills.

Schools should conduct a debrief after every drill.

What went well? Where did delays occur? Were all students accounted for? Reviewing drills is necessary for improvement.

Mistakes to Avoid

One mistake is treating fire drills like a routine interruption instead of a preparation exercise.

When fire drills are hurried, or if students and staff are not laser-focused on the fire drill along with its importance, students and staff are far less likely to take the necessary actions during a real fire emergency.

Other problems are (overcrowded exits,) (unclear teacher instructions,) (not accommodating for students with special needs in drill planning.)  The problems identified can be resolved by honest and continuous review through professional development and practices that support planning for the whole school community.

Enhancing Drills with Modern Tools

Technology’s role in modern fire preparedness is becoming increasingly important.

Smart cameras, AI alerts and digital attendance tracking systems, allows schools to respond quicker and much more accurately.

For example, when schools use a digital system that tracks students check in during evacuations, schools don’t have to guess on a paper roster.

Integrating these tools into your drills ensures that the school isn’t just compliant—it’s truly prepared.

Involving the Community

An effective fire safety plan should be more than just the school.

Schools should be working with their local fire department in a more collaborative way regarding reviews and training on a regular basis.

Informing parents when drills occur through newsletters, or meetings will create trust and will also help remind parents to reinforce safety lessons at home.

FAQs

How often should fire drills be conducted in schools?

Most states require schools to hold one fire drill per month while in session.

However, it’s best to vary timing and scenarios throughout the year.

Are unannounced fire drills effective?

Yes.

While announced drills are good for training, unannounced drills better simulate real emergencies and test true preparedness.

What should schools do for students with special needs during fire drills?

Create Individualized Evacuation Plans (IEPs) with input from caregivers, teachers and staff.

Assign aides or buddies as needed to ensure safe and calm evacuations.

Is it necessary to run drills during lunch or class changes?

Absolutely.

Emergencies can happen at any time and practicing during non-standard periods ensures everyone is prepared no matter where they are on campus.

Do private schools have to follow the same regulations?

While regulations vary, most private schools are expected to follow local safety codes and maintain their own documentation for drills and emergency plans.

Key Takeaways

Fire drills are an essential aspect of school safety protocols, but their effectiveness, as well as the planning and strategy we are going to talk about, depend on purposeful planning, age appropriate methodology and consistency of review.

With powerful resources like AI surveillance detects a fire early and coordination platforms, the need to go beyond the bare minimum of compliance is clear, we can create a culture of readiness.

No matter if you are with first graders or high school seniors, the intent is the same — make sure everyone understands what to do when every second counts.

About the Author

Peter Lee is a seasoned content marketer with a strong focus on B2B and AI-driven solutions. With years of experience crafting high-impact content strategies, Peter helps tech companies translate complex technologies into compelling stories that drive growth and engagement. When he’s not writing about the future of AI, he’s exploring the intersection of innovation and business strategy.

Emergency planning for all: Evac+Chair on why workplaces must rethink evacuation

by Featured NewsIFSJ Exclusives

Evac+Chair’s research highlights the critical need for inclusive evacuation plans across workplaces and public spaces

Evac+Chair is the original manufacturer and global leader in emergency evacuation chairs, developed for the mobility impaired.

Underpinned with over 40 years of experience in the design and UK manufacture, of evacuation chairs, Evac+Chair is trusted and relied upon in emergency situations to assist in saving lives, worldwide.

With a range of accreditations including ISO 9001: Quality Management System and ISO 13485: Medical Device Quality Management and quality checks throughout the whole manufacturing process, Evac+Chair is dedicated to manufacturing products that meet the highest of standards.

Committed to pioneering innovations for a safer and more inclusive world, Evac+Chair is passionate about ensuring that everyone can be evacuated.

Beyond access: Rethinking evacuation for true inclusivity

Since the late 1960’s we have seen the International Symbol of Access (ISA) known as the International Wheelchair Symbol, displayed worldwide, representing a place accessible for those with disabilities, in particular wheelchair users.

As our world has evolved, we have seen the introduction of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) 1995, later replaced with the Equality Act 2010 and slowly seen improvements in accessibility within public spaces, commercial buildings and working environments.

However, we are a long way off a fully inclusive world that is not only accessible but also supports egress, for all.

Whilst the focus has predominantly been making buildings accessible for those with impairments, a solid, robust plan for exiting is crucial to save lives.

When planning for an evacuation it is not uncommon for organisations to assume that if they do not have a wheelchair user within their workforce, evacuation equipment is either not necessary or minimal aids are needed.

However, what about those with invisible impairments? Conditions that are not obvious, such as cognitive dysfunction, injuries, chronic illnesses.

Or those with temporary impairments? Such as individuals on crutches, those recovering from surgery, or even a heavily pregnant lady whose mobility may be limited, in an evacuation situation.

For the able-bodied evacuating a building would seem easy enough, however the reality for those with a mobility impairment, is somewhat very different.

We see time and time again, when the fire alarm is raised, people pausing questioning if it is real, even stopping to collect belongings.

For the mobility impaired they are filled with trepidation, knowing they are reliant on assistance, unable to self-evacuate.

Hidden barriers: Why inclusivity matters

Risky Business, an independent study, conducted in 2023 by Evac+Chair, discussed the types of barriers people could face and highlighted the need for fully inclusive evacuation plans.

An example of a case study from this research was that of Mark, who lives in London and works as an IT support technician the 18th floor of a 25-storey building.

Mark takes medication for a mental health condition that can cause periods of anxiety, disorientation and forgetfulness.

Sometimes, this can result in him having difficulty finding his way around, even on familiar routes.

The effects of his medication may pose a risk of him being delayed in an emergency evacuation.

The latest estimates from the Family Resources Survey (FRS), run by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), indicate that 16.1 million people in the UK have a disability.

This represents 24% of the total population.

Currently, there are 25.3 million people who work in the UK, of which 5.53 million are disabled, a figure which is on the rise.

This highlights the importance of organisations having a fully inclusive evacuation strategy and installing the correct evacuation aids to create a space that is safe for all, which is vital to protect and save lives.

A further example of the lack of inclusivity that exists, highlighted by the Risky Business report, was that of Kira, who discussed her experience with her mobility and evacuation in her workplace.

Kira explained, “I am a wheelchair user and secured a job as a trainee in a law firm.

“As it was early in my career, I was less confident around how to approach the building managers about access barriers and evacuations.

I” kept my head down and didn’t query it, putting trust in the building manager and team.

“They assured me my Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) addressed that they would “assist me” in the event of an emergency.

“But when the time came to test the plan, we realised they’d assumed I could transfer myself from my wheelchair into an evacuation chair – I am unable to stand or weight-bear.

“I ended up having to drive the conversation and could sense their discomfort talking about my needs.” 

Even when buildings have evacuation plans and equipment in place, there is still the need to test the plan and ensure it is suitable and fully considers the needs of those with mobility impairments.

A comprehensive evacuation plan: Ensure safety for all

Only planning for the needs of employees isn’t enough, good preparation includes those whose needs can’t be anticipated such as visitors who may require assistance during evacuation situations.

Businesses shouldn’t be left in the position of having to ask visitors ahead of their visit to disclose their disabilities, this is considered as discrimination.

Ensuring a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) and a Generic Emergency Evacuation Plan (GEEP) are up to date, not only ensures the safety of those who enter your business but keeps a business compliant.

A PEEP is tailormade to ensure the safety of a specific person in the event of an emergency evacuation and must be drawn up with the individual, so that the method of evacuation can be agreed.

The plan must be clear within the organisation and for anyone who will be assisting the individual to evacuate.

Whereas a GEEP, is a more catch-all evacuation plan for buildings used by the public or places of work, with a transient workforce.

These are focused on visitors to a building who may face access barriers who are unable to self-evacuate and require assistance.

As with a PEEP the method of assisted evacuation must be clear and those who will are designated to support an individual to evacuate must understand the plan, the method of evacuation and be trained to use any evacuation aids.

Planning for the worst will keep your premises safe for all.

If an emergency does strike, a regularly tested PEEP or GEEP, alongside trained Fire Marshalls and the correct evacuation equipment are all crucial to protecting lives.

Beyond fire: The growing risk of climate change and evacuation

Typically, fires are the assumed main cause of evacuation, however there are many other risks that can be the reason for an emergency evacuation.

Global warming is becoming more prevalent year-on-year, making extreme weather and flooding a ‘when’ rather than an ‘if’.

In 2023, the most common natural disaster type in the world were floods, reported by Statista, with 164 events reported that year.

Currently, 2.27% of commercial properties in Britain are at risk from flooding.

To put that in perspective, that’s one in every four commercial properties, or 436,000 country-wide – the equivalent of all commercial properties in Greater London, Manchester, Bristol, Edinburgh, Merseyside and most of Yorkshire.

Interestingly, that is twice the rate of flood risk facing domestic properties.

As we have tragically seen, not only does this cause disruption to businesses but during this time, extreme storms and flooding have led to loss of life.

These conditions are unfortunately becoming a norm; however, preparation can ensure that lives are saved in an emergency.

Tailormade solutions: Cover all mobility needs

The global age profile is changing, with more people over the age of 64 than children under the age of 5.

This coupled with an increase in individuals working beyond the traditional retirement age of 65, highlights an even greater importance for organisations to have a fully inclusive evacuation plan.

As we age, many individuals will suffer with impacted mobility, with all of this in mind, there is a need for more to be done to ensure no one is left waiting to be evacuated, or worse lose their life.

Dedicated to the mission of accessibility for all, Evac+Chair offer solutions to suit a wide variety buildings and personnel, including a range of evacuation chairs, with payload capacity’s up to 227kg, ascent and descent evacuation, spiral and narrow staircases, with the option of 1 – 4 operators (where necessary) and a motorised, battery operated solution.

While the Evac+Chair has proven to be the safest and fastest means of evacuation, depending upon the circumstances, other evacuation aids could be more appropriate, i.e.

if an individual is unconscious or unable to get into a seated position, a ResQMat may be more suitable.

Furthermore, if the individual is unable to self-transfer, the ProMove sling, designed to wrap-around and cocoon the passenger, allowing them to be lifted and moved without the need of a hoist, is the perfect accompaniment to an Evac+Chair.

Evac+Chair offer free evacuation assessments and strongly recommend that businesses take advantage of this service before purchasing an Evac+Chair.

An experienced Evac+Chair specialist, will assess your building and select the correct model from their wide range to suit your organisation and personnel.

The assessment considers the needs of any employees who have a PEEP, alongside the type of evacuation; ascent, descent or a combination, stair configuration and evacuation route, fire exits, potential obstacles, refuge and assembly points.

Whilst an Evac+Chair is user friendly, easy to deploy and use, it is essential that all operators complete regular training, to instil confidence and competence.

Courses are available nationwide, conducted by dedicated Evac+Chair training consultants.

Training is hands-on, allowing delegates to not only understand the practical operation but experience the Evac+Chair from a passenger’s perspective too.

Alongside training, it is essential to invest in annual maintenance to ensure your Evac+Chair remains fully operational throughout its lifetime and ready to use in an emergency.

Evac+Chair offer 1-, 3- and 5-year maintenance contracts to help keep business compliant with the PUWER Regulation (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations – UK only).

Maintenance includes a full, physical inspection, replacement of any worn or damaged parts, that no other third party can supply.

Book your free evacuation assessment today and ensure your personnel and visitors are safe. Tel: +44 121 706 6744. Email: enquiries@evacchair.co.uk. Visit: evacchair.co.uk.

This article was originally published in the February 2025 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal – to read your FREE digital copy, click here.

AI and IoT drive growth in global voice evacuation systems market

by Featured NewsFire DetectionResearch

Global voice evacuation systems market projected to reach USD 1.79 billion by 2029

The global voice evacuation systems market is projected to grow by USD 1.79 billion from 2025 to 2029, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.6%, according to a report by Technavio.

Technavio attributes this growth to the expansion of the real estate and construction sectors, alongside increased adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in building control systems.

The report states that voice evacuation systems are increasingly used in commercial buildings, industrial facilities, and public spaces due to their ability to provide clear emergency instructions.

According to Technavio, Asia-Pacific is expected to account for 41% of the market’s growth, driven by urbanisation, infrastructure investments, and regulatory requirements for fire safety systems.

However, the report highlights that high initial installation costs of voice sounders and loudspeakers pose a challenge to widespread adoption.

IoT integration in voice evacuation systems

Technavio’s report states that IoT integration is improving voice evacuation systems by enabling interconnectivity between devices.

The report notes that traditional standalone voice alarm systems are now being incorporated into smart building ecosystems.

According to the report, IoT-enabled systems allow for real-time monitoring and automated alerts, which can improve response times.

Technavio also highlights that the development of mesh networks is expected to support connectivity among multiple devices, potentially enhancing system reliability.

The report indicates that regulatory bodies are increasingly requiring automated emergency alarm systems, which is contributing to the adoption of IoT-integrated solutions.

Challenges in adoption and installation costs

Technavio identifies cost as a key challenge in the adoption of voice evacuation systems.

The report states that the initial investment includes expenses for hardware, installation, and maintenance, which vary depending on building size and system complexity.

The report highlights that large-scale facilities, such as hospitals, hotels, and educational institutions, require more extensive installations, increasing procurement expenses.

According to Technavio, factors such as customisation, zoning considerations, and integration with existing fire safety and communication systems also impact overall costs.

Technavio’s report further states that retrofitting older buildings presents additional challenges, particularly in ensuring interoperability with legacy systems.

The report notes that professional installation services are typically required, adding to overall expenses.

Regional market trends and key players

Technavio’s report states that Asia-Pacific is expected to be the largest contributor to market growth, followed by North America and Europe.

The report identifies the US, China, Germany, and India as key markets due to regulatory requirements for fire safety systems and increasing infrastructure investments.

According to the report, key companies operating in the market include ABB Ltd., Eaton Corp plc, Honeywell International Inc., Siemens AG, Johnson Controls International Plc, Bosch GmbH, Baldwin Boxall Communications Ltd., and TOA Corp.

The report states that these firms are investing in research and development to improve system capabilities, with a focus on AI-driven automation and enhanced audio quality.

Technavio: Global voice evacuation systems market to grow by USD 1.79 billion by 2029 – Summary

A report by Technavio forecasts that the global voice evacuation systems market will grow by USD 1.79 billion between 2025 and 2029, with a CAGR of 21.6%.

The report attributes this growth to the expansion of the real estate and construction industries, as well as the increasing adoption of IoT in building management systems.

Technavio states that Asia-Pacific will contribute 41% of market growth.

The report highlights that IoT integration is improving system efficiency by enabling real-time monitoring and automated emergency response features.

However, it notes that high installation costs, system compatibility issues, and the need for professional installation services are challenges.

The report identifies key market players including ABB Ltd., Eaton Corp plc, Honeywell International Inc., Siemens AG, and Johnson Controls International Plc.

Technavio states that these companies are focusing on AI and automation to enhance voice evacuation system capabilities.

The report also highlights that regulatory requirements for fire safety systems are expected to drive further market demand.

The safety management revolution: Introducing QDOS’ dynamicZM

by Breaking NewsBuilding Management

Damian Linley, CEO of QDOS, introduces dynamicZM, a product bridging aesthetics and functionality in fire safety management

The fire safety landscape is constantly evolving, demanding innovative solutions to meet the ever-changing needs of building occupants and emergency responders.

 QDOS, a provider of fire safety solutions, has taken a bold step forward with the introduction of dynamicZM, a revolutionary product designed to transform fire safety management.

At QDOS, we’ve heard concerns from countless end users regarding the unappealing look of traditional fire zone displays and control panels. dynamicZM was born from this very feedback.

We used cutting-edge technology, four years of development and a six-figure investment to create a device that adheres to fire safety regulations, while also enhancing the user experience, bridging the gap between aesthetics and functionality.

Fire safety equipment is something that premises managers need, dynamicZM is a device that users want.

A dynamic approach to fire safety

dynamicZM acts as a dynamic zone mimic for fire alarm systems.

Unlike traditional static zone mimics that only illuminate an LED on a building plan during an active fire, dynamicZM functions as a dual-purpose device.

dynamicZM functions as digital signage displaying user-chosen media or messages during normal operation, however, upon fire alarm activation, the screen displays a detailed building plan, clearly highlighting the zone(s) in alarm.

Suited for a range of settings, from retail and offices to education, construction sites and manufacturing facilities.

Behind the innovation

The development of dynamicZM is a testament to the combined knowledge and experience of a dedicated team, as well as collaboration with clients and the end-users who have been dissatisfied with the fire plans currently available.

The QDOS team has been working across the fire industry for many years, with expertise is complemented by David Greenwood, a fire alarm specialist with a distinguished 40-year career.

David was instrumental in ensuring dynamicZM is as well engineered as possible, including some sophisticated monitoring for faults and essential test facilities that enable testing without the need to activate the host fire alarm system.

The initial response to dynamicZM from those who’ve tried and tested it has been overwhelmingly positive.

Fire safety professionals and end users alike recognise its potential to significantly improve fire safety.

Retailers appreciate the media functionality and the ability to display timed messages about upcoming fire alarm tests, ensuring a smooth and prepared evacuation process.

Fire and rescue services see particular value in dynamicZM’s application for care homes.

The ability to identify the fire zone immediately upon arrival allows for a faster and more targeted response, potentially saving lives in these vulnerable environments.

Beyond compliance

While traditional fire safety equipment is a necessity, dynamicZM goes even further than simple compliance.

It elevates a necessary safety measure into a valuable tool that enhances existing fire alarm systems.

This translates to improved response times in emergencies, ultimately saving lives and minimising property damage.

Rapid response is paramount in industrial settings where fire hazards can escalate quickly.

 dynamicZM addresses this critical need.

Each system can be configured for the specific site, displaying bespoke messaging or instructions based on the zone in alarm.

This crucial information can guide occupants towards the safest evacuation route or alert personnel to specific safety protocols depending on the location of the fire.

An additional level of health and safety practices, during regular operation, the screen can function as a digital notice board.

This allows organisations to display essential safety reminders for staff and visitors, reinforcing a culture of safety awareness.

Varied applications

The choice of a large LCD screen for dynamicZM offers several advantages.

The screen provides ample space for a detailed building plan, ensuring compliance with fire safety regulations like BS 5839-1:2017 for zone plan clarity.

The high-definition display doubles as a modern and visually appealing digital signage solution.

dynamicZM proves its versatility across various commercial settings.

When installed at entrances of offices or retail spaces, it delivers clear fire safety messaging to visitors and customers.

The ability to display customised instructions on the screen during emergencies is particularly beneficial for those unfamiliar with the building layout.

The possibilities are – almost – endless when not displaying fire safety information.

dynamicZM can showcase content to suit the setting, from timetables to menus, promotional offers, company information, or even live news feeds, keeping visitors engaged.

Integration and innovation

Installation of dynamicZM is straightforward.

It connects to the existing fire alarm control panel via a single 2-wire data link.

This streamlined approach eliminates the need for complex rewiring or additional control panels.

The system seamlessly retrieves data and displays relevant zone information in case of a fire alarm, while functioning as digital signage during normal operation.

QDOS remains dedicated to ongoing development of dynamicZM.

 The company prioritises user and installer feedback, allowing for agile adaptation and future enhancements.

 Their complete in-house design of both software and hardware ensures dynamicZM remains at the forefront of fire safety technology, continuously evolving to meet the ever-changing needs of the industry.

This article was originally published in the September 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Evacuate and protect everyone with Evac+Chair

by Breaking NewsBuilding ManagementSafety

Claire Blakemore, the new MD of Evac+Chair, discusses how innovative solutions, training and annual maintenance can ensure safe evacuation for everyone in an emergency

The selection of an appropriate evacuation chair requires careful consideration and a thorough assessment of both the building, its evacuation route(s) and any PEEPs (Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans) or GEEPs (General Emergency Evacuation Plans) that are in place, to ensure safety and compliance.

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, amended by The Fire Safety Act in 2021, stipulates that the designated responsible person must take reasonable steps to ensure everyone can evacuate in the event of an emergency.

Employers must ensure that their commercial building meets the required standards by conducting regular fire risk assessments, informing all employees of the identified risks and maintaining the appropriate measures to minimise these.

Installing the correct Evac+Chair helps to meet these legal obligations and assists in the protection of employees and visitors; should an emergency evacuation occur.

Firefighters can take 30 minutes to assist with an evacuation, however, the correct Evac+Chair can evacuate a 24-story building in just 14 minutes*.

Evac+Chairs are proven to be the safest and fastest method of evacuation for those who require assistance; which includes individuals with permanent, invisible or temporary mobility impairments; such as pregnancy or mental health conditions.

Evacuation assessments

Evac+Chair provides complimentary evacuation assessments, conducted by their team of nationwide experienced and dedicated specialists.

It evaluates the needs of any employees who have a PEEP including their weight, height and medical condition, as well as assessing safety and usability; particularly concerning training.

The assessment considers the type of evacuation; ascent, descent or a combination, stair configuration and evacuation route(s), potential obstacles, refuge and assembly points.

Additionally, it is imperative that the Evac+Chair is fitted with the correct belts, to ensure the evacuation chair operates correctly.

The type of belts required is dependent on the staircase nosing material, also identified during the assessment.

Quality and reliability

Evac+Chair is a proud UK manufacturer and has been designing and producing innovative life safety products for over 40 years.

Based in the West Midlands, in a state-of-the-art headquarters and utilising world-class technologies and processes; Evac+Chair is committed to ensuring its products meet the highest quality standards, are fit-for-purpose and right first time.

Be fully prepared

After purchasing an Evac+Chair(s), the first step is to install the evacuation chair(s) at the designated evacuation points within your building.

This ensures that the Evac+Chair is readily accessible in case of an emergency.

Training: Certified training is essential to ensure that your Evac+Chair can be operated safely and effectively.

Evac+Chair offers industry-leading training courses across the UK, conducted by a team of highly skilled in-house and experienced trainers.

Courses are tailored to meet the specific needs of your environment and personnel, aiming to build confidence and competence in operating your Evac+Chair and therefore being fully prepared should an emergency evacuation occur.

Maintenance: As a Class 1 Medical Device, an Evac+Chair requires annual servicing and maintenance to ensure its safe operation, as outlined in the PUWER Regulation.

Evac+Chair offers 1-, 3- and 5-year maintenance contracts, conducted by their nationwide in-house service team.

The Evac+Chair service team will inspect your evacuation chair(s) and replace any worn parts with genuine replacements, that no other third party can supply.

Annual maintenance is crucial to ensuring your Evac+Chair(s) will be fully operational in an emergency.

Plan: Having an evacuation plan that includes either a General Emergency Evacuation Plan (GEEP) or a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) will help ensure should the worst happen; you will be fully prepared to evacuate everyone.

These plans are crucial as they ensure that everyone knows what to do in an emergency, including trained personnel such as Fire Marshalls and operators of assistive equipment.

The plan should be regularly practiced, tested and adapted (if required), therefore ensuring lives will be protected.

Interview with Claire Blakemore

Congrats on the new role – what drew you to Evac+Chair?

I’ve always been immersed in industries focused on helping people, particularly through product management.

My career began at a company that produces rehabilitation equipment which instilled in me a passion for creating solutions that genuinely enhance people’s lives.

As my career evolved, I transitioned from product management to leading businesses.

My roles have consistently aligned with my interest in industries that protect, rescue, and support people, often in critical situations.

When I met Ges Wallace, the former MD of Evac+Chair, his passion for the company and the people it helps was so genuine.

It’s hard to say no to a role where you can see the direct impact of the products you’re involved with.

Evac+Chair is a company with a strong culture, a solid philosophy, and products that truly make a difference in times of crisis.

That resonates deeply with me.

I’ve always been drawn to environments where we can provide innovative solutions to real problems.

The products we create at Evac+Chair International are not just highly engineered; they’re lifesaving.

It’s incredibly meaningful to work on something that goes beyond profit—something that genuinely helps people in their most vulnerable moments.

This gives a profound sense of purpose, which I find crucial in any role.

I truly believe that every building with stairs should have an Evac+Chair.

Everyone deserves the opportunity to escape safely, not just those of us who are able-bodied.

In emergencies, it’s often every person for themselves, but we need to ensure that equipment is available so that everyone can escape safely and in a timely manner.

I’m genuinely passionate about this because I’ve seen firsthand how people with physical impairments are often considered last in emergency situations.

I know that people in wheelchairs are often at the bottom of the priority list during evacuations.

That’s something I find morally unacceptable.

It’s our duty to make businesses aware of the importance of providing products like Evac+Chair.

We all know someone who might need this—whether it’s a parent, a friend, or a colleague.

Ensuring their safety shouldn’t be an afterthought; it should be a priority.

What are your initial priorities as the new MD of Evac+Chair?

Continuing the excellent work the team has already accomplished and amplifying our efforts to raise awareness—not just of our brand, but more importantly, of the critical need for our solutions.

The team has done a phenomenal job, and I see an opportunity to push even further by engaging more actively with governmental bodies.

Our goal is to advocate for increased investment in safety solutions like ours, not because businesses are reluctant, but because there is often a lack of awareness about the importance of these products.

I believe it’s our responsibility to educate and inform both businesses and end-users about the vital role these solutions play in ensuring everyone’s safety.

How do you plan to drive the continued growth of Evac+Chair around the world?

Our plan to drive the continued growth of Evac+Chair, both in the UK and overseas, is focused on a few key strategies.

First and foremost, our mission is to raise awareness that our products aren’t just a nice-to-have—they’re a must-have.

It’s crucial to emphasise both the moral and legal responsibilities that come with ensuring safety, and our goal is to make more people aware of this need.

To support this, we’re committed to ongoing investment in our business, starting with our people.

We aim to be the employer of choice in our industry by fostering a culture of innovation and excellence.

By continuously investing in our team, we can ensure that we remain at the forefront of safety solutions.

Another critical area of focus is our commitment to manufacturing in the UK.

We’re incredibly proud that our products are made here, and we want to continue that tradition.

To sustain and grow our UK manufacturing, we need to expand our sales, both domestically and internationally.

We’re actively seeking to build more partnerships, not just in the UK but across the globe.

We’re committed to growing our presence in the UK, but also in Europe, the Middle East, and the US, where we already have a strong foothold.

We believe in the superior quality of our products and the value of supporting UK manufacturing, and our goal is to establish Evac+Chair as a leading British-made product in markets worldwide.

This article was originally published in the September 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Howler releases whitepaper on changes to fire evacuation protocols in UK flats

by Featured NewsResearchSafety

Howler unveils new guidance on simultaneous evacuation in residential buildings

Howler, a UK site fire safety expert group, has recently published a whitepaper titled “NFCC Guidance: Temporary Change to Simultaneous Evacuation in Flats.”

This document arrives as various councils across the UK are failing to meet fire safety standards, as reported by Howler.

Gary Askew, the Managing Director at Howler, highlighted the significance of the whitepaper: “Following the unprecedented national tragedy at Grenfell Tower in June 2017, the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) issued guidance to property managers about steps to be taken where there were concerns around cladding issues.

“As time went by and more information became available, the guidance was updated and refined.

“Our whitepaper takes a good look at that guidance, examining the problem and the solutions available.”

The current state of evacuation policies and new approaches

The whitepaper discusses the persistence of the ‘stay-put’ policy in thousands of residential flats across the UK, a strategy where residents remain in their flats during a fire elsewhere in the building, feasible only with proper fire compartmentalisation according to the Building Regulations.

However, the Grenfell tragedy revealed the catastrophic failure of such compartmentalisation, prompting a reassessment of fire safety strategies.

Askew continued: “What occurred at Grenfell was that fire separation failed completely, and there is now an awareness amongst Fire Risk Assessors that there may be times when a stay-put is not adequate, and instead a building must be immediately, or ‘simultaneously’, evacuated in the event of a fire.”

Howler’s response and innovations in fire safety solutions

Responding to the NFCC’s guidelines, Howler has launched a new initiative called Howler Special Services.

This service is aimed at facilitating changes in the evacuation strategies of large residential buildings through the installation of radio-linked fire alarm systems.

These systems, which can be temporary until remedial works are completed or upgraded to permanent systems, are designed to replace the Waking Watch service.

“We’ve been installing fire safety solutions for over 30 years, and in response to the NFCC’s guidance, we’ve just launched Howler Special Services which has been designed to include the installation of radio-linked Fire Alarm systems specifically to facilitate the change in the evacuation strategy of large residential buildings,” Askew elaborated.

IFSJ Comment

The release of Howler’s whitepaper and the introduction of new specialised services reflect an adaptive response to evolving fire safety standards and legal requirements in the UK.

As the industry continues to deal with the implications of the Grenfell Tower disaster, initiatives like those by Howler are pivotal in ensuring that safety regulations are not only met but enhanced to prevent future tragedies.

Fire Brigades Union challenges new Home Office evacuation guidelines

by Associations and OrganisationsBuilding Management

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU), representing a significant number of UK firefighters, has issued a strong criticism of the newly published government guidelines on building evacuation.

This response comes in the wake of the Home Office’s release of evacuation guidelines for fire and rescue services, specifically for high-rise buildings.

The FBU’s letter, addressed to the Home Secretary, James Cleverly MP, dated 1st March 2024, expresses concerns that the guidelines fail to provide adequate assurance or practical guidance to residents and firefighters, particularly in scenarios reminiscent of the Grenfell Tower tragedy.

Details from the letter

The letter, penned by Matt Wrack, General Secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, states: “These guidelines will not reassure residents in high-rise buildings. They do not help disabled and vulnerable residents.

“These guidelines do not explain to incident commanders how to evacuate high-rise buildings.”

The union emphasises that the guidelines, which are the result of a joint Home Office and Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities technical steering group formed in December 2019, fall short in several critical areas.

The FBU criticises the guidelines for their brevity and lack of substance, noting that they consist of just nine pages and fail to address key issues such as the protection of fire exit routes and specific evacuation procedures for people unable to use stairs.

FBU’s  stance on evacuation guidelines

Wrack further remarked in the letter: “It is a disgrace that more than four years after the GTI report, the Home Office can only manage a publication of nine pages in length containing so little of real substance.”

The FBU’s stance is that the guidelines, while summarising some basic evacuation principles, offer little in the way of new or substantial information that would assist fire and rescue services in effectively planning and executing evacuations in high-rise buildings.

The union also expresses disappointment in the live test exercises conducted by the Home Office, describing them as unrealistic and not representative of conditions in a disaster similar to the Grenfell Tower fire.

IFSJ Comment

The Fire Brigades Union’s critique of the Home Office’s evacuation guidelines highlights ongoing challenges in ensuring the safety of residents in high-rise buildings, especially in emergency situations.

The Union’s call for more comprehensive and practical guidance reflects the need for robust policies that address the complexities of high-rise evacuations, including the needs of vulnerable residents.

This situation underscores the importance of continuous improvement in fire safety standards and the vital role of fire and rescue services in protecting the public.

The FBU’s input, as a body representing frontline firefighters, is crucial in shaping effective and realistic fire safety policies.