FireAngel warns of compliance gap in domestic installations

White Paper highlights institutional oversight while FireAngel identifies a compliance gap

The UK Government has published the Construction Products Reform White Paper to address failings in the safety and compliance of products used in the built environment following the Grenfell tragedy.

FireAngel welcomed the publication as a milestone in addressing regulatory gaps and institutional oversight.

The manufacturer asserts that policy reform requires a shift in installation competence to ensure resident safety.

Kate Guy, Business Unit Director at FireAngel, stated that the strategy aims to tackle loopholes that allowed unsafe products to enter the market.

FireAngel identifies compliance gap in Grade D installations

Guy warned that current industry practices frequently overlook the specific complexities of BS 5839-6 which is the British Standard for fire detection in domestic premises.

“Our own knowledge and recent initiatives highlight a significant “compliance gap” in the domestic fire safety sector, specifically regarding the installation of Grade D fire alarm systems.

“While general electrical competence is often assessed, the specifics of BS 5839-6, the British Standard for fire detection and Grade D fire alarm systems in domestic premises, are frequently overlooked.

“This means that the issued electrical certificate of “compliance” may not guarantee the necessary competence required of the electrical contractor.”

Industry shift toward verified competence

FireAngel launched the Pro Installer Network to provide trade professionals with tools to ensure every installation is compliant.

The initiative provides access to CPD training and a third-party verified design service.

It also includes a compliance labelling solution to support the trade ecosystem.

Kate Guy added: “The White Paper’s focus on “raising the bar” for non-compliance and a testing sector that “can be trusted” aligns perfectly with our mission.

“We believe that true safety requires a shift from “tick-box” exercises to a culture of verified competence.

“We must continue to place stakeholder accountability and resident safety at the core of every building.

“We support the government’s commitment to reducing systemic weaknesses to ensure the delivery of high-quality homes.

“Now is the time for the entire industry to embrace transformational cultural shifts and industry-wide reforms so that compliance is never treated as an optional extra.”

The manufacturer remains involved in the conversation regarding building safety regulations to support the delivery of high-quality homes.

Michelle Skeer to lead HMICFRS on interim basis from April

First woman named interim HMICFRS Chief Inspector

Michelle Skeer OBE QPM has been appointed interim Chief Inspector of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services and will take up the role on 1 April 2026.

His Majesty’s Chief Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) announced that His Majesty the King had approved the appointment, with Skeer succeeding Sir Andy Cooke after he leaves office in March 2026.

Skeer joined HMICFRS in 2023 as His Majesty’s Inspector.

She has overseen inspections of police forces and fire and rescue services across the north of England.

She has also held national responsibility for inspecting domestic abuse, child protection and police engagement with women and girls.

HMICFRS said Skeer brings 36 years of combined experience across policing and fire and rescue.

She will be the first woman to hold the position of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services.

In 2018, she became the first woman appointed Chief Constable at Cumbria Constabulary.

Her national roles have included serving as Vice Chair of the National Police Chiefs’ Council and leading the management of violent and sexual offenders.

In 2017, she received the Queen’s Policing Medal for distinguished service.

In 2019, she became President of the British Association of Women in Policing.

She was awarded an OBE in the King’s 2023 Birthday Honours List.

Appointment takes effect in April 2026

HMICFRS said Skeer was designated as interim chief inspector by the Home Secretary following an expression-of-interest process open to serving His Majesty’s Inspectors.

The interim appointment was made in line with the Governance Code on Public Appointments.

Skeer said: “I am honoured to be appointed to this important role at a pivotal time for police forces and fire & rescue services.

“The inspectorate plays a vital role in identifying problems early, supporting sustainable improvements and promoting best practice.

“I look forward to building on the strong foundations established by Sir Andy Cooke.

“I am committed to making sure HMICFRS continues to provide independent, evidence-based oversight, firmly focused on ensuring the public receives the service they expect and deserve.

“Our work is essential to making communities safer.”

The appointment process for a permanent chief inspector is being managed by the Home Office.

HMICFRS independently assesses the effectiveness and efficiency of police forces and fire and rescue services.

Motorola Guardian Hub command centre connects multi-agency fire response

Command centre links three fire services

Fire and rescue teams in Norfolk, Suffolk and Hertfordshire are using Motorola Solutions’ Guardian Hub command centre platform to support joint incident management across more than 100 stations and a population of over 2.5 million people.

Motorola Solutions said the cloud-based system allows the three fire and rescue services (FRSs) to jointly manage 999 calls, dispatch crews and track incidents during mutual aid scenarios.

The platform is designed to support each agency’s daily operations and enable collaboration across the lifecycle of an incident at short notice.

Bringing control room operations into a shared hub means the three services can work more closely during major incidents.

The system also removes the need for each FRS to maintain separate IT systems, which the company said could reduce duplication and ease pressure on call handlers during busy periods.

Darren Cook, assistant chief fire officer at Hertfordshire FRS, said: “Emergencies aren’t restricted by borders, and our responses shouldn’t be either.

“Working closely with Norfolk and Suffolk is already leading to more efficient and effective responses, and the chance to share knowledge on how we’re using this new technology has been incredibly valuable.

“Within hours of the hub going live, we saw the benefits, as Suffolk FRS operators took calls and managed dispatch for Hertfordshire FRS during a large structure fire incident.”

Command centre supports mutual aid and training

The company said the shared hub gives neighbouring FRSs visibility into ongoing incidents and supports closer coordination during periods of high demand.

Scott Norman, deputy chief fire officer at Norfolk FRS, said: “During extreme weather events and major fires, it’s crucial that we can share call handling and frontline resources with neighbouring FRSs.

“The system gives us visibility into our partners’ ongoing incidents to mobilise our own crews faster and respond more effectively.

“Ultimately, we can provide a better service for our community, when and where they need it.”

Jon Lacey, chief fire officer at Suffolk FRS, said: “Our work can often be a matter of life or death – we needed a system which would hit the ground running and enable entirely new ways of working with our neighbouring FRSs.

“Motorola Solutions fit the bill perfectly.

“The Hub model has already proven its value with call handlers able to manage extremely high call volumes and allowing each FRS to seamlessly provide additional support when needed.

“We’ve also found unexpected benefits, such as allowing all control room staff to take part in planned training exercises, without disrupting active operations.”

David Shorland, U.K. and Ireland sales director, Motorola Solutions, said: “Fire and rescue services are there for their communities, but the pressure they face continues to grow.

“Guardian Hub gives services a better way to connect, coordinate and respond.

“With agencies increasingly required to do more with less, we’re providing a resilient, scalable model to help serve and protect communities.”

England audit data shows persistent fire safety compliance gaps

Fire safety audit findings across England

Almost half of audited purpose-built blocks of flats were rated unsatisfactory in fire safety checks across England, with 45% requiring remedial action to meet regulations.

The figures were analysed by Drax Technology using data released by Fire and Rescue Services for the period 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.

A total of 4,257 buildings over four storeys were audited, with 1,923 failing to meet required standards.

There are around 120,000 buildings of this size across England.

Audits assess records, fire safety equipment and management practices to identify compliance issues.

Each audit is graded as satisfactory or unsatisfactory.

The Responsible Person is required to maintain the validity of the audit, particularly following changes such as structural alterations.

Enforcement action and audit ratings

The proportion of unsatisfactory results fell slightly from 49% in the previous year.

Fire and Rescue Services issued 445 enforcement notices requiring building managers to address identified deficiencies within a set timeframe.

Twenty buildings were served with Prohibition Notices, where serious and imminent risks to life meant all or part of the premises could not be used.

Six cases led to prosecution after failures to complete required remedial actions.

Less serious breaches were addressed through informal notifications.

The data also showed that 34% of high-rise buildings of 10 storeys or more received an unsatisfactory audit.

Drax Technology comments on compliance records

David Simpson, Group Product Director at Drax Technology, said: “Blocked escape routes, failing emergency lighting, and faulty alarms are too often pushed down maintenance lists until a fire exposes the devastating consequences.

“Under the Building Safety Act, compliance can no longer be assumed, it must be proven.

“Building managers across BTR, the PRS and social housing, now need clear evidence of what was inspected, when, and by whom.

“Gaps in record-keeping represent a serious operational, financial, and regulatory risk.”

Simpson said the analysis highlighted both non-compliance and limited visibility over whether fire safety standards were consistently being met.

“There is no room for uncertainty when it comes to resident safety,” Simpson said.

“Digital platforms can give property teams constant oversight of fire safety systems, allowing issues to be identified and resolved before inspections, or worse, before an emergency.”

He added that 34% of high-rise buildings of 10 storeys or more receiving an unsatisfactory audit reflected the added complexity of these buildings.

“High-rise buildings pose greater risks because fire fighter access is more complex, so robust and consistent fire safety measures are critical,” he said.

“The industry must step up and do better.”

The data set used for the analysis was FIRE1202.

HMICFRS outlines updated inspection programme for fire and rescue services covering 2025 to 2027 cycle

Inspection programme announced for fire and rescue services

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has announced its latest fire and rescue service inspection programme, covering the inspection cycle from 2025 to 2027.

HMICFRS said the programme operates on a two-year cycle, which is the time required to inspect each of the 44 fire and rescue services in England.

The inspectorate gathers evidence throughout the cycle using a range of methods to help make sure the inspection programme reflects changes in fire and rescue and lessons learned from previous inspections.

This process also enables inspectors to examine challenges affecting services and adjust inspection priorities accordingly.

Updated inspection areas include leadership and governance

The updated inspection programme retains changes introduced in the previous cycle and introduces additional areas of focus, HMICFRS said.

It said there will be a greater emphasis on leadership across fire and rescue services, including leadership at every level.

Inspectors will assess Fire and Rescue Authorities’ governance, oversight and scrutiny of their services, including how efficiently services manage projects such as rebuilding or relocating fire stations.

The programme will also apply deeper scrutiny to values, culture and misconduct, building on thematic work examining how misconduct is identified and handled.

Inspectors will assess how services support community resilience, including their work with local communities to prevent fires.

Assessment framework and grading structure

HMICFRS said the inspection programme is a regular assessment of fire and rescue services in England, examining effectiveness, efficiency and how well services look after their people.

Services are assessed against ten core questions covering management of risk, prevention, regulation, response to emergencies and multi-agency incidents, resources, workplace culture, development, fairness and diversity and leadership.

Each area is graded as outstanding, good, adequate, requires improvement or inadequate.

Roy Wilsher, His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire & Rescue, said: “Our inspection programme must evolve to reflect the challenges facing fire and rescue services.

“The changes we have made for this cycle build on what we have learned from previous inspections and focus on the areas where we know improvement is most needed, including governance, leadership and community resilience.

“Our aim is to provide independent, evidence-based assessments that support services to improve and help keep the public safe.”

London tops England for vehicle fire incidents per registered vehicles

Vehicle fire figures by area

London recorded 453 vehicle incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles in the latest Direct365 report.

Direct365 said it analysed Fire and Rescue Services callout data from 31 services in England over the past year.

The London Fire Brigade attended 7,572 vehicle incidents in the recorded period.

Tyne and Wear recorded 343 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

East Sussex recorded 268 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Merseyside recorded 263 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Lancashire recorded 255 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Nottinghamshire recorded 219 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Greater Manchester recorded 206 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Leicestershire recorded 194 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

South Yorkshire recorded 194 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

West Yorkshire recorded 193 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Kent recorded 29 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles, the lowest figure listed.

Durham and Darlington recorded 46 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Derbyshire recorded 114 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Cornwall recorded 117 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Lincolnshire recorded 128 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

West Midlands recorded 130 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Oxfordshire recorded 135 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Hereford and Worcester recorded 140 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Buckinghamshire recorded 143 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Gloucestershire recorded 145 incidents per 10,000 registered vehicles.

Road incidents as share of service workload

Buckinghamshire recorded road vehicle incidents as 20.4% of all callouts in the recorded period, the highest share listed.

Lincolnshire recorded road incidents as 17.5% of all callouts.

Shropshire recorded road incidents as 16.6% of all callouts.

West Midlands recorded road incidents as 16.4% of all callouts.

Hereford and Worcester recorded road incidents as 16.0% of all callouts.

Derbyshire recorded road incidents as 16.0% of all callouts.

Durham and Darlington recorded road incidents as 14.4% of all callouts.

Cornwall recorded road incidents as 14.3% of all callouts.

Oxfordshire recorded road incidents as 13.9% of all callouts.

Cumbria recorded road incidents as 13.1% of all callouts.

London’s vehicle incidents accounted for 5.5% of all London Fire Brigade callouts in the same period.

Direct365 comment on regional differences

Karl Bantleman at Direct365 commented: “Data from Fire and Rescue Services across England clearly illustrates the tireless, around-the-clock work of this sector, ensuring our nation’s safety.

“The disparity between vehicle safety of counties like Kent and the high incident rates in areas like London and Tyne and Wear shows that road risk is heavily influenced by local infrastructure and traffic density.

“We’ve seen road incidents account for over 20% of Fire and Rescue callouts in areas like Buckinghamshire which demonstrates the fluctuating pressure placed on different regional services.

“Regardless of location, vehicle owners must take proactive steps to reduce risk.

“Routine maintenance is vital to preventing incidents and ensuring our essential emergency services can focus their resources where they are most needed.”

The report separates incident rates per registered vehicles from the share of overall callouts linked to road incidents.

NFCC calls for sustained investment after provisional finance settlement

NFCC welcomes £5 precept rise but flags long-term gaps

The UK Government has published a provisional local government finance settlement covering 2026-2027 to 2028-2029, with measures that affect fire and rescue service funding.

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) Chair Phil Garrigan responded to the provisional settlement and said it reflects government recognition of financial pressures on fire and rescue services.

He said funding was starting to move in the right direction for fire and rescue services, while adding that further work remained after previous reductions in investment.

NFCC welcomes the precept option

Garrigan said the NFCC welcomed the ability for fire and rescue authorities to increase their council tax precept by £5.

He also welcomed a real-terms funding increase pledged to authorities that take up that opportunity.

Garrigan said this reflected engagement by the NFCC on behalf of Chief Fire Officers, their authorities and the wider sector.

Phil Garrigan, NFCC Chair, said: “This provisional settlement shows that the financial pressures being experienced by fire and rescue services are at last being acknowledged.

“We are seeing things starting to move in the right direction on fire and rescue service funding, but on the back of huge disinvestment in previous years there is still more to do.

“We welcome the ability for fire and rescue authorities to increase their council tax precept by £5, and the real-terms funding increase pledged to those that take up that opportunity.

“This reflects the engagement by NFCC on behalf of Chief Fire Officers, their authorities and the wider sector who have played their part in seeking better recognition of the critical role our services play.”

Claims on staffing and capital investment

Garrigan said the measures would help services avoid further real-terms cuts.

He said they did not reverse a decade of reduced investment.

Garrigan said firefighter numbers had fallen by approximately 11,000.

He added that nearly £1 billion had been lost in capital funding.

He said fire and rescue services were dealing with increasingly complex and evolving risks while carrying out public safety work each day.

Next steps and ongoing engagement

Garrigan said the NFCC would work through the detail of the settlement.

He said the settlement represented an important step forward.

He welcomed what he described as positive engagement from government on matters of public safety.

He said the NFCC would continue to advocate for funding that reflects the role of fire and rescue services and supports continuous improvement in response.

What this could mean for fire and rescue budgets

The settlement sets out a framework for local government funding across 2026-2027 to 2028-2029, and the NFCC response signals that fire and rescue authorities may have scope to raise additional funding through a £5 council tax precept increase.

For Fire Chiefs, Chief Fire Officers and senior finance leads, the NFCC comments indicate that planning assumptions may hinge on whether an authority uses the precept option linked to a real-terms increase.

For procurement officers and equipment specifiers, Garrigan’s reference to capital funding losses of nearly £1 billion frames why capital planning remains a live issue for fleet replacement, station estates and major equipment programmes.

For training officers and operational leaders, the NFCC estimate of an approximate 11,000 fall in firefighter numbers provides context for workforce capacity discussions that may sit alongside any funding uplift.

Exclusive: Considerations for outsourcing aviation fire and rescue services

Chris Thain, Business Development Manager for Fire & Rescue Service at G3 Systems Ltd, talks outsourcing aviation fire and rescue services

When it comes to outsourcing a process to an outside organisation there is always a lot to consider in terms of how it will affect the business as it could affect staff numbers and impact existing management systems and processes.

To find out about the ins and outs outsourcing aviation fire and rescue services, International Fire and Safety Journal caught up with Chris Thain, Business Development Manager for Fire & Rescue Service at G3 Systems Ltd, a supplier of bespoke operational delivery of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) and Industrial Rescue and Firefighting Services (RFFS) to airports and high-risk industrial facilities around the world.

Why should businesses consider outsourcing their ARFF and RFSS services?

Outsourcing fire and rescue services can enable organisations to concentrate on their core business, while continuing to maintain and improve safety, resilience, and regulatory compliance. It enables companies to focus on their own customers’ needs while delegating essential but non-core requirements to external specialist providers. This releases internal resources that can be put to more effective use for other purposes, leading to greater overall efficiency and competitiveness.

It is unrealistic for airport operators to be experts in every business function, process, and discipline required to manage a modern airport, it is simply far too expensive to maintain this level of knowledge and expertise internally. By utilising outsourced service providers, airport operators can leverage a global knowledge base and resource centre, accessing world class capabilities, skills, and expertise that they may have been precluded from previously.

What are some of the key benefits of outsourcing?

Managed ARFF service providers often have access to a wider, more highly skilled, and diverse talent pool than the client themselves and will already have in place the requisite interview and selection processes designed to select only the strongest, most appropriately qualified, and experienced staff.

Training and competence management can reflect global best practice, with industry and/or site-specific risks recognised, evaluated, and reflected in the ongoing training provided to the ARFF staff members.

Shared experiences gained from a variety of different airports or industrial operations, coupled with specialist skill sets, ongoing education, learning and professional development and best working practices also enable the outsourced service provider to add value and resilience to and further reduce risk within the client’s operation.

As specialists in their field, outsourced ARFF service providers are generally much better at deciding how to cost effectively avoid risk in their areas of expertise without compromising safety and response, than perhaps a fully employed on-site team might be.

What are the biggest concerns around outsourcing?

Firstly, there is issue of compliance. If we assume that the vehicles and equipment provided by or for the ARFF meet the ICAO standards for the airport Category and that they are well maintained and fit for purpose, then the only other variable affecting the service delivery and compliance standards is the ARFF officers and staff that are engaged on the contract.

The second issue often stems from concerns around management control and responsibility for delivery. Relinquishing a degree of authority and responsibility can be difficult but By delegating and working as partners, communicating openly, honestly and in a timely manner, and through building close working relationships, we quickly overcome any feelings of doubt or concern.

Thirdly, the issue of cost versus benefit must always be addressed. While airport ARFF services may be seen by some as an expensive mandatory cost, in most cases the provision of an outsourced ARFF service can deliver cost savings in other areas of airport maintenance and management.

Finally, a common misconception is that outsourcing an existing airport ARFF service to a third-party provider will result in firefighters losing their jobs. This is simply not the case. In most situations, it makes sense for the outsourced provider to retain as many of the incumbent staff as possible on the contract.

What are the cost considerations involved in outsourcing?

People and equipment form the largest elements of cost for any ARFF service. Labour costs, including the costs of employment, vary from country to country and from role to role within the ARFF itself. The mix of officers to firefighters, the availability and recruitment of ex-pat staff versus local staff and the contractual conditions of work all influence the final cost of labour for the end customer. It is also very important to consider local employment terms and conditions and to ensure that costs such as social insurance, pensions and contractual stipends are captured and included.

Similarly, emergency vehicles and the technical equipment required to effectively fight fires and rescue people in modern aircraft and airport incidents can be very expensive. For example, a typical airport crash rescue tender can range in price from $500,000 to more than $1.2 million depending upon the age, technical specification, and the category of airport the vehicle is required to protect. Given that a CAT 10 airport requires a minimum of three such vehicles fully loaded with PPE and safety equipment, you can quickly see how the costs to deliver the ARFF service can mount up.

Other ancillary costs for the ARFF service will include staff travel, training and certification costs, communications, IT and data costs, licenses, and permit costs, insurances, medical support and, in some extreme cases, security and life support costs.

What should businesses consider when deciding to outsource when it comes to selecting a partner organisation?

The first consideration should be around timing – when is the new service required to be at full operating capacity and is there enough time work through the tendering and selection process to ensure a successful outcome? The earlier that engagement can begin with potential partner organisations, the better for all parties.

The next consideration is to know what ARFF services you require – being clear on the full scope of requirement early in the process will ensure clarity for all parties and will deliver a smoother, more cost-efficient service in the longer term.

Finally, be realistic about the budget for delivering a fully compliant ARFF service for your aerodrome – manage the expectations of those responsible for allocating and approving the budget and ensure that the safety of travellers, airport staff and firefighters always remains the highest priority.

What are the main services you offer for customers looking to outsource their aviation fire and rescue services?

G3 systems offer the following main services for our customers:

  • Structural & industrial rescue & fire fighting service
  • Aviation crash/rescue & fire fighting services
  • Emergency dispatch & control
  • Incident command & control
  • On-site fire safety, fire inspection & service
  • Emergency vehicle management & maintenance
  • Fire & rescue equipment and facilities management & maintenance
  • Fire & rescue training
  • Emergency medical services

How do you analyse the needs and requirements of potential clients?

Assessing the needs of a potential client begins with a conversation to determine what kind of airport they are operating (Civilian, Military or both, or Heliport/Seaplane Airport etc.) and what the ICAO Category for the airport is or will be. This immediately helps determine the number and type of emergency vehicles that are required to meet the regulations (ICAO Annex 14 Document 9137 Part 1: Rescue and Fire Fighting) and therefore the minimum number of staff that will be required to effectively deliver the ARFF service.

We determine if the airport is already operational, with an incumbent ARFF service, or if the airport is a new development requiring a first time ARFF presence. The geographic location of the airport is also important as we need to understand the local operating conditions, both physically and environmentally as well as commercially. We also need to understand the timing requirements for the airport and the process that the customer will undertake for competitive tendering.

A task resource analysis is conducted, and mobilisation and project management plans created to understand exactly how the new ARFF service will be implemented. We then also have our strict risk based internal process to navigate, ensuring that any responsibilities and liabilities that we take on are manageable and viable for us as an organisation.

What are you focused on at the moment?

We have some exciting prospects on the horizon and are currently working on new projects in the Middle East, Africa, and the Indian Subcontinent, which we hope will result in long term ARFF contracts taking us into the 2030’s.

In the meantime, we are also actively engaged with trade organisations such as the Airport Fire Officers Association and attending events such as Interschutz 2022, to continue to meet with our clients and colleagues across the aviation industry and to support the sector as much as possible.

This article was originally published in the June edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

NFCC launches Maturity Models and Workforce Good Practice Framework

Developed in conjunction with fire and rescue services and based on the principles of the Deloitte methodologythe models and framework allow fire and rescue services to assess current practice by using a self-assessment tool to determine current maturity level.

The tool can be used to assess current practice against a range of different areas, these being: Leadership Development, Recruitment, Learning Organisation, Blended Learning, Performance Management, Employee Recognition, Talent Management, EDI, Wellbeing and HR Analytics.

Project Executive Chief Fire Officer Ann Millington, of Kent Fire and Rescue Service, said: “We’re pleased to bring to fruition the models and framework, which will support fire and rescue services in assessing their current practice as well as identifying potential steps for the future.  

“This isn’t intended to be a tick-box exercise, it’s a work in progress and should involve fire and rescue service staff at all levels and across all departments to build a bigger picture.” 

A service can choose how many or how few areas to benchmark themselves against, but they should revisit and review periodically to identify any opportunities.

It is the objective of NFCC that the models and framework will help to drive consistency across services in becoming leading practice organisations and shared learning is encouraged.

The Maturity Models and Workforce Good Practice Framework are acknowledged and supported by HMICFRS and have been developed as part of the People Programme.

Queries and feedback about the Maturity Models can be directed to: implementationsupport@nationalfirechiefs.gov.uk

More information about the Maturity Models and Workforce Good Practice Framework can be found on the ukfrs site: www.ukfrs.com

FBU general secretary claims firefighters “might not be able to fight all fires” if job cuts continue

The general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union has claimed that continued cuts will mean day-to-day work of the fire and rescue service will be weakened. Firefighter numbers have reached a new low since the beginning of austerity in 2010. One in five firefighter roles which existed in 2010 no longer exist, according to figures released, with a fall in numbers of 11,680 since then.

The figures have been released just prior to Priti Patel’s speech to Conservative conference. As Home Secretary, Patel has responsibility for fire and rescue.

Matt Wrack, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, said: “After years of huge government cuts and staffing falls there is a real threat that fire and rescue services may not be able to deal with every incident, and fight all fires: for example, we have heard senior service managers state that the public should lower their expectations that large wildfires can be tackled. The cuts are weakening the day-to-day work of the fire and rescue service in every single area; they are making people less safe. They also pose a threat to the ability to respond to large scale incidents – particularly if more than one were to occur at the same time. 

“Households deserve to feel protected. We all want to be able to walk past fire stations and know that there are enough people in there to protect us. And firefighters will always do whatever they can to save lives. It’s time the government does the same.”

  • Since 2010 more than 8,000 wholetime firefighters have gone, out of the 11,680 total. 
     
  • London alone now has 1,112 less firefighters than 2010, with falls of 615 in West Yorkshire, 631 in Greater Manchester, 551 in Devon and Somerset and 470 in the West Midlands. Other standout figures include a cut of 70 firefighters between 2020 and 2021 alone in Hampshire, and 49 in Devon and Somerset.
     
  • The overall figure compared to last year for the UK is a loss of 185 firefighters, or a 0.4% decrease – a further cut, and meaning numbers remain in the pit they have been cut to by years of brutal austerity.   

The impression that the fire and rescue service has been short-staffed to breaking point is also evidenced by a range of figures, with response times across all types of fires in England increasing since 2010, and fire audit and home fire safety check numbers in England constantly falling across this period.

Additionally, new threats could mean that firefighters will become even more stretched. Climate change is thought to have increased both flood risk and the number of wildfires in the UK.

The figures come from a freedom of information request from the Fire Brigades Union. 

The Fire Brigades Union defines firefighters to include wholetime, retained and control staff.