Australia firefighting infrastructure targeted in Airservices plan

This is not firefighting reform, UFUAV says

A proposal by Airservices Australia would transfer aviation rescue fire stations, specialised firefighting vehicles, training facilities and protective equipment to a third-party commercial entity under a long-term leaseback arrangement.

The United Firefighters Union of Australia – Aviation Branch (UFUAV) said the proposal would amount to the privatisation of the nation’s Aviation Rescue Fire Fighting Service and the transfer of critical emergency service infrastructure to a sovereign wealth fund.

The arrangement would see Airservices lease the assets back after the transfer.

UFUAV said the proposal would also move specialised emergency vehicle technicians and maintenance capability to the private asset owner.

The union said this would separate maintenance capability from operational firefighting functions within a system it described as an integrated emergency response capability.

UFUAV says proposal could affect readiness

UFUAV Branch Secretary Wes Garrett said the proposal would commercialise a frontline emergency service that exists to maintain public safety and save the lives of air travellers when disaster strikes.

Garrett said: “Aviation firefighting is not a money-making enterprise.

“It is a lifesaving emergency service.

“The moment you introduce a profit motive, safety stops being the first priority.

“Australians expect world-class aviation rescue firefighters to come to their aid when something goes wrong, not an emergency service run according to a lowest bidder mentality designed to maximise returns for an investment fund.

“Under the proposal, ownership and management of critical aviation safety assets would be transferred to a commercial operator whose primary obligation would be delivering a financial return to investors, not protecting the safety of air travellers or firefighters.”

He added: “We have seen this exercise attempted in other jurisdictions before.

“When profit becomes a central driver of decision-making, there is always inevitable pressure to cut costs.

“That will mean delaying maintenance on our specialised firefighting vehicles, reducing investment in equipment and facilities or underinvesting in operational readiness.”

Garrett said those risks carry catastrophic consequences in aviation firefighting.

He said: “In an aircraft fire, passengers typically have only minutes to survive.

“International aviation standards require firefighters to reach an incident within three minutes because every second counts.

“If operational preparedness is compromised by cost-cutting or delayed maintenance, the consequences could be fatal for passengers and devastating for firefighters who are sent into those situations.”

The union said long-term lease arrangements would lock the Commonwealth into escalating costs designed to deliver profits to investors and said it would oppose any attempt to privatise aviation rescue firefighting services.

Garrett said: “If aviation firefighting can be privatised, what emergency service is next?

“The travelling public deserves a world-class aviation rescue firefighting service that puts safety first every single time.

“They do not deserve a system where critical emergency infrastructure is run to maximise financial returns.”

He said: “Firefighters will never accept a future where lifesaving services are hollowed out to satisfy financial models.

“When safety fails, it is the travelling public and our firefighters who pay the price.

“We call on Airservices Australia to put the lives of Australia’s air travellers first by abandoning the proposal to privatise the aviation firefighting services they rely upon to keep them safe.”

Fire Brigades Union warns on station closures in Dorset and Wiltshire

Station closures proposals name eight sites

Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service has informed firefighters of proposals to close eight fire stations across the service area.

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) said the proposals were shared on 23 January and warned they would put lives at risk by reducing emergency cover across Dorset and Wiltshire.

The eight stations facing potential closure are Ramsbury, Bradford on Avon, Wilton, Mere, Cranborne, Hamworthy, Maiden Newton and Charmouth.

The fire authority is scheduled to meet on 10 February to decide whether to progress the proposals to a 13-week public consultation.

Union response and operational concerns

The FBU said closing fire stations would leave communities without adequate protection from fires, flooding and other life-threatening emergencies.

Barney Hedgecock, FBU fairness at work representative for Dorset and Wiltshire, said: “Dorset and Wiltshire fire and rescue service is already severely overstretched and under-resourced.

“The raging Holt Health wildfire this summer should have been a stark warning that the service needs urgent investment to face increasing extreme weather events.

“Firefighters work tirelessly to keep communities safe, but the reality is that cuts and station closures put lives at greater risk.

“Fewer firefighters and fire engines available will mean slower response times to emergencies, at times when every second counts.

“The FBU is calling on the fire authority to reject these disastrous proposals.

“The council and fire service leaders must put public safety first and stop these cuts.”

Wider industrial context

The FBU said it is placing members on an industrial footing to defend services against cuts across the UK.

It said firefighters in Oxfordshire are moving towards industrial action in response to proposed cuts by the county council, and that cuts have been averted in Avon and Leicestershire following union campaigns.

Steve Wright, Fire Brigades Union general secretary, said: “Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service is facing a devastating loss of resources, with senior leaders threatening to close eight fire stations.

“We need a fire and rescue service that is fit to face the future.

“Closing fire stations and running the service ragged will only leave communities at greater risk.

“Instead we need investment to rebuild resilience.

“The FBU is ready to fight to prevent dangerous cuts up and down the country, and firefighters have been successful in stopping them in several brigades.

“Firefighters are making it clear that we won’t stand by while cuts cost lives.

“Dorset and Wiltshire fire authority and fire service must do everything in their power to secure the funding desperately needed to rebuild the service.”

The fire authority will determine next steps following its meeting on 10 February.

Why two British fire stations were denied heritage status despite expert backing

Fire stations in Bath and Shoreditch denied historic listing

Architects Journal has reported that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport has refused to list Bath Fire Station and Shoreditch Fire Station despite recommendations from Historic England.

The publication said Bath Fire Station, completed in 1937 to a design by architect Molly Gerrard, is one of the few known fire stations designed by a woman.

It added that Shoreditch Fire Station, built in 1965, was designed in the Brutalist style by London County Council.

Both buildings now face an uncertain future after government decisions diverged from the advice of the heritage body.

In Bath, Architects Journal reported that BDP has submitted a proposal to demolish the current station and construct a new facility for Avon Fire and Rescue Service.

According to the BBC, Avon Fire and Rescue Service has said the doors of the current station are too narrow for modern appliances, making the building unsuitable for operational needs.

Bath Fire Station and its heritage status

Historic England described Bath Fire Station as an accomplished Art Deco design with a compact and well-articulated plan.

The heritage body said it retains original fixtures and fittings that contribute to its historical value.

It also noted the importance of Gerrard’s role as a female architect at the time of construction.

In its rejection, DCMS said Bath Fire Station is not considered innovative and that its features are typical of fire stations built in the interwar period.

The rejection letter added that its design by a female architect did not represent a sufficiently special factor to justify protection.

Shoreditch Fire Station assessment

Historic England advised that Shoreditch Fire Station was a creative and expressive example of Brutalist architecture.

It said the concrete frame and brick facing were used to create elevations animated by strong structural forms.

The heritage body also highlighted its origins as a rare post-war design from the London County Council architects department.

According to Architects Journal, heritage minister Fiona Twycross recused herself from the decision due to previous roles with London Fire Brigade and related organisations.

Arts minister Ian Murray’s rejection letter stated that many Brutalist buildings and LCC-designed sites already hold listed status across England.

Campaigners’ reaction to government decision

Oli Marshall, campaigns director at the Twentieth Century Society, criticised the outcome.

He said: “This striking pair of fire stations couldn’t be more different.

“One is a 1960s, geometric Brutalist block of concrete and brick in Shoreditch, the other is a sandstone 1930s stripped Classical and Art Deco beauty in Bath’s UNESCO World Heritage Site.

“Both have a strong claim to architectural and historic interest and would now be Grade II-listed, yet instead they face the maddening prospect of demolition due to a ministerial intervention.

“One has to ask why DCMS is ignoring the recommendations of their appointed experts, Historic England, and Twentieth Century Society, the relevant national amenity society?”

Marshall added: “There are several examples of nationally listed historic fire stations that continue to be operational, with sensitive adaption and modernisation to suit the evolving needs of the fire brigade.

“Euston Fire Station in London is perhaps the best known.

“Opened in 1902 and Grade II*-listed in 1974, it has been in continuous use for 123 years.

“Why couldn’t the same enlightened approach be taken in the cases of Shoreditch and Bath?”

DCMS response to heritage concerns

A DCMS spokesperson commented on the decision.

They said: “There are over 370,000 listed buildings in England, designated on the grounds of special architectural or historic interest.

“The criteria for listing are set out in the secretary of state’s principles of selection for listed buildings.”

Wider context of fire station preservation

The debate has drawn attention to the preservation of historic fire stations.

Some campaigners argue that operational buildings can be maintained while adapting to modern service requirements.

Others emphasise the cost and complexity of retrofitting ageing structures for today’s fire appliances.

The Bath and Shoreditch cases illustrate the balance between heritage value and practical functionality.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

For fire services, the discussion reflects broader issues around maintaining operational readiness in historic facilities.

Modern fire appliances often require larger bays, higher ceilings, and different access routes than those provided in older buildings.

The outcome of the Bath and Shoreditch cases may influence future redevelopment decisions for other ageing stations across the UK.

Heritage considerations could affect both budgets and operational planning when balancing cultural preservation with the needs of a modern service.

Fire stations in Bath and Shoreditch denied listing: Summary

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has refused to list Bath Fire Station and Shoreditch Fire Station.

The decision went against recommendations from Historic England.

Bath Fire Station was completed in 1937 by architect Molly Gerrard.

Shoreditch Fire Station was built in 1965 by London County Council.

BDP has submitted plans to demolish Bath Fire Station and replace it with a new facility.

BBC reported Avon Fire and Rescue Service said the building is unsuitable for modern appliances.

Historic England argued both stations had architectural and historic importance.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said Bath Fire Station lacked innovation and special features.

It also said Brutalist buildings and LCC designs are already represented in the national listings.

Campaigners at the Twentieth Century Society opposed the decision.

They said other historic fire stations, such as Euston, show adaptation is possible.

DCMS said 370,000 buildings are already listed in England.

The department referred to the secretary of state’s criteria for listing.

The decision leaves the future of both sites uncertain.