Workplace fires: The three sectors carrying most of the UK incident burden

Workplace fires concentrated in industrial, food and retail premises

System Building Services has analysed ten years of Home Office data and found that industrial premises, food and drink venues and retail buildings together account for more than 60% of workplace fires in the UK.

The company examined incident statistics for non-residential buildings between 2015/16 and 2024/25 using the Home Office FIRE0301 and FIRE0602 datasets.

Its analysis covers all recorded workplace fire incidents in non-residential buildings, including fatalities and non-fatal casualties, to map fire risk patterns in commercial settings.

Industrial premises recorded 1,656 fires in 2024/25, which System Building Services calculates as 24.85% of all workplace fires in that year.

Food and drink premises saw 1,275 fires, or 19.13% of the total, while retail premises recorded 1,177 fires, equivalent to 17.66%.

Combined, these three workplace types account for more than 60% of all 6,665 workplace fires recorded in 2024/25.

System Building Services links the higher industrial risk to flammable materials, high-temperature processes, heavy machinery and complex electrical systems operating under sustained load.

It notes that food and drink venues and retail premises couple public access with long operating hours, and in the case of hospitality, routine use of cooking and heating appliances.

Brian Michie, Managing Director at System Building Services, said: “Industrial environments carry inherent fire risks due to the nature of operations, but what many business owners overlook is how multiple risk factors can compound.

“A facility might have adequate fire doors, but if electrical systems aren’t regularly inspected or flammable materials aren’t properly stored, you’re still vulnerable.”

Hospitality settings such as hotels, boarding houses and hostels recorded 505 fires, equal to 7.58% of workplace incidents in 2024/25.

Entertainment, culture and sport venues saw 445 fires, or 6.68% of the total, while hospitals and medical care facilities recorded 433 fires, representing 6.50%.

Education premises accounted for 417 fires, or 6.26%, agricultural premises recorded 409 fires, or 6.14%, and offices and call centres saw 348 fires, equal to 5.22% of workplace incidents.

Electrical faults and smoking materials among leading causes

System Building Services reports that almost half of all workplace fires in the Home Office dataset – 49.89% – are recorded under unspecified or other causes.

Within the remaining category data, electrical distribution faults form the largest identifiable cause, with 2,126 fires, or 18.04% of workplace incidents.

These electrical distribution fires involve equipment such as fuse boxes, circuit breakers, wiring systems and distribution boards, often starting within walls or ceiling voids before detection.

Smoking-related materials form the next largest cause, with 1,505 fires, representing 12.77% of the total despite smoking bans in enclosed workplaces.

System Building Services notes that these incidents frequently occur in smoking shelters where cigarettes are not fully extinguished or in outdoor areas where embers reach combustible items.

Other domestic-style appliances are linked to 776 fires, or 6.58%, while space heating appliances are recorded as the cause in 433 fires, or 3.67%.

Matches and candles account for 366 fires, or 3.11%, showing that open flames remain a cause in workplaces during activities such as maintenance, religious observance or power outages.

Electric lighting is recorded as the cause in 362 fires, or 3.07%, often due to overheating luminaires, damaged wiring or lights installed close to combustible materials.

Blowlamps, welding and cutting equipment are linked to 182 fires, or 1.54%, mainly in industrial and construction environments carrying out hot work.

Cooking appliances are recorded as the cause in 108 fires, or 0.92%, while office equipment appears in 48 incidents, or 0.41% of workplace fires.

Michie said: “The electrical distribution figure is telling because these fires are largely preventable through regular inspection and maintenance.

“Businesses often focus on visible fire safety measures like extinguishers and alarms, but the hidden infrastructure poses just as much risk.”

Workplace fire trends from 2015 to 2025

System Building Services calculates that total workplace fires in non-residential buildings have fallen 29% over the ten-year period from 2015/16 to 2024/25.

The analysis shows that recorded workplace fires reduced from 9,347 in 2015/16 to 6,665 in 2024/25.

Between 2015/16 and 2019/20, yearly workplace fire totals fell steadily, with annual reductions ranging between 2.19% and 5.68%.

System Building Services notes that this pattern points to improved fire safety awareness and greater compliance with regulatory duties across many workplaces.

The sharpest drop occurred in 2020/21, when workplace fires fell 24.58% year-on-year to 6,134 incidents during the pandemic period.

Following the easing of restrictions, workplace fires rose 19.74% in 2021/22 to 7,345 incidents, though still below pre-pandemic levels.

The downward trend then resumed, with total workplace fires reducing by 5.46% in 2023/24 and by a further 5.23% in 2024/25.

Michie said: “The sustained reduction is positive, but we’re still seeing over 6,500 workplace fires annually.

“Each incident represents potential danger to employees and serious disruption to business operations.”

Wider non-residential fire picture and fatalities

The System Building Services analysis also examines fires across all non-residential buildings, including workplaces, communal housing and public-use buildings.

It finds that total non-residential fires decreased from 16,025 incidents in 2015/16 to 13,172 incidents in 2024/25, an 18% reduction over the ten-year period.

In the pre-pandemic years between 2015/16 and 2019/20, non-residential fires fell from 16,025 to 14,331, with year-on-year totals moving downward.

During 2020/21, the number of non-residential building fires dropped to 11,924, a reduction of 17% and the lowest level in the decade.

Unlike the specific workplace fire trend, non-residential building fires then increased for two successive years, reaching 12,952 in 2021/22 and 13,576 in 2022/23.

Figures then declined modestly to 13,297 in 2023/24 and 13,172 in 2024/25.

Fatalities in non-residential building fires varied between 11 and 23 deaths per year over the ten-year period.

The highest level occurred in 2015/16, with 23 deaths, while 2021/22 recorded the lowest level, with 11 deaths.

There were 12 fatalities recorded in non-residential building fires in 2024/25.

Michie noted: “The relatively stable fatality rate despite thousands of fires suggests detection and evacuation systems are effective when properly maintained.”

Financial and legal impact of workplace fires

System Building Services highlights that the costs of workplace fires extend beyond the initial damage to buildings and equipment.

It explains that businesses face direct expenses such as repairs, replacement of equipment and higher insurance premiums after a fire.

Indirect costs can include lost revenue during closures, failure to deliver contracts and customers moving to other suppliers.

The company notes that many businesses face long periods of interruption after an incident, ranging from months to several years depending on the damage caused.

Some businesses never reopen after a serious fire, especially where there is limited insurance coverage or few financial reserves.

Michie said: “A lot of business owners underestimate the full cost of a fire.

“Even a relatively minor incident can shut down operations for weeks while repairs are completed and safety inspections are carried out.

“For businesses operating on tight margins, that interruption alone can be fatal.”

System Building Services also draws attention to the legal duties set out in the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety Order) 2005.

Under this framework, responsible persons must undertake regular fire risk assessments, implement appropriate fire safety measures, maintain fire safety equipment and provide staff training.

Breaches can lead to prosecution, with penalties including unlimited fines and up to two years’ imprisonment for serious offences.

Following a workplace fire, fire and rescue services typically investigate the incident and may identify failings in fire safety management.

System Building Services notes that where failings contribute to injuries or fatalities, responsible persons may face criminal charges.

It adds that insurance claims may be refused or reduced if proper fire safety measures were not in place when the fire occurred.

Michie commented: “The legal consequences can be severe, but more importantly, proper fire safety measures save lives.

“No business owner wants to face prosecution, but they should be even more concerned about protecting their employees and customers from harm.”

Practical steps businesses can take to reduce workplace fires

System Building Services uses the analysis to underline the role of day-to-day fire safety management on sites with elevated risk.

It stresses the importance of programmed inspection regimes that reach beyond obvious fire safety features such as extinguishers, alarms and fire doors.

The company advises closer focus on electrical infrastructure, storage of combustible materials and housekeeping in plant rooms, storage spaces and voids.

Michie said: “Businesses can identify hidden fire risks by conducting thorough inspections beyond the obvious.

“Check electrical systems regularly, particularly in older buildings where wiring may be deteriorating.

“Look for overloaded sockets, frayed cables, and equipment that feels warm to the touch when not in use.

“Pay attention to areas where combustible materials are stored.

“Are they kept away from heat sources?

“Are escape routes clear?

“Fires often start in overlooked spaces like storage rooms, plant rooms, or roof voids where maintenance work has been carried out but debris hasn’t been cleared.

“Don’t rely solely on annual inspections.

“Train staff to spot potential hazards during their daily routines.

“Someone working in a space every day will notice changes that an annual inspector might miss.

“Regular maintenance, proper housekeeping, and a culture where employees feel empowered to report concerns can prevent most workplace fires before they start.”

How UK workplace fire data can inform risk management

System Building Services’ analysis of Home Office data offers quantifiable evidence about where workplace fire risk is concentrated across UK business sectors.

Fire safety officers can use the sector breakdowns and cause data to prioritise inspections in industrial premises, food and drink venues and retail buildings.

Risk assessors can integrate the electrical distribution and smoking-related incident figures into assessments of older sites and premises with high electrical loads or external smoking shelters.

Facility managers in hospitals, education premises, agricultural buildings and offices can benchmark their fire incident exposure against national figures for similar property types.

Electrical contractors and fire-protection contractors can draw on the cause data to support maintenance schedules for distribution boards, fixed wiring and space heating equipment.

Fire and rescue chiefs and senior officers can reference the ten-year trends in workplace and non-residential fires when planning prevention campaigns and business engagement programmes.

Architects and building services engineers involved in new or refurbished industrial and hospitality facilities can consider the incident data when specifying passive fire protection and electrical infrastructure.

ASFP Awards 2025 reveal the passive fire projects setting new benchmarks

ASFP Awards 2025 mark record entry levels

The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) celebrated the ASFP Awards 2025 with a record field of entries recognising achievements in passive fire protection across the built environment.

The organisation said the ceremony highlighted individuals, companies and projects that have advanced safety and professionalism in the sector.

ASFP reported that categories covered installation projects, innovation, digital tools, training, marketing, customer service, advocacy and long-term contribution.

The 2025 awards formed part of its 50th birthday year activities.

Project and innovation winners span heritage and redevelopment

ASFP reported that Checkmate Fire Solutions won Small-Scale Installation Project of the Year for its passive fire protection upgrades at Springfield Mount for the University of Leeds.

The association stated that the scheme involved a series of Victorian residential buildings and was recognised for combining sensitive heritage refurbishment with current fire-safety requirements on a project under £1 million.

Kilnbridge Fire Protection received Large-Scale Installation Project of the Year for its role in the Olympia redevelopment.

ASFP said the Kilnbridge team coordinated more than 32,000 compliant passive fire protection installations across one of the UK’s most complex multi-plot sites.

Siderise was named Innovation Project of the Year for a pleated rainscreen cavity barrier solution developed for the G-Gate building at Olympia.

According to ASFP, the bespoke design addressed the building’s unconventional façade geometry and was cited as an example of collaborative fire safety engineering.

Quelfire won Digital Innovation of the Year for its QuelSelector tool.

The association described QuelSelector as an intuitive, free-to-use system that supports firestopping product selection and compliance by reducing errors and improving workflow efficiency across the supply chain.

ASFP Awards training and academic achievements recognised

ASFP stated that Siderise, Corrodere and Isoler received Training Recognition awards.

The association said these organisations were acknowledged for training programmes that link regulatory requirements, product knowledge and on-site installation practice.

Level 2 and Level 3 Academic Achievements were awarded to Stephen Richards of Avert Fire and Rick Cullen of Intoheat.

ASFP reported that Stephen Richards achieved the highest score at Level 2, while Rick Cullen achieved the highest score at Level 3.

The association noted that these academic awards recognised emerging professionals who are investing in their technical development in passive fire protection.

Customer service, advocacy and lifetime honours announced

ASFP confirmed that Quelfire also received Marketing Campaign of the Year for its “Because It’s Your Job to Know” campaign.

The association said the campaign was recognised for promoting shared responsibility in passive fire protection practice.

GSI Contract Services and Nullifire were named Supplier Relationship of the Year.

ASFP stated that the partnership was highlighted for its collaborative technical approach, including the launch of GSI’s training academy supported by Nullifire.

Optima Systems received Customer Service of the Year for the work of its OPTech team.

The association said the team was recognised for delivering rapid, evidence-based guidance that supports compliance on complex projects.

Margherita Mullis of Promat was named Rising Star of the Year.

ASFP reported that she was recognised for work across product development, regulatory alignment and cross-industry collaboration.

Nineteen Group received Advocate of the Year.

The association cited its role in promoting fire safety awareness across the construction and events sectors.

ASFP presented the Lifetime Contribution Award to Niall Rowan.

The association said he was honoured for decades of work to improve standards, deepen technical understanding and promote a safer built environment.

Past winners of the Regatta Challenge were also recognised, with Belgrade Insulations, Consort and CLM Fireproofing receiving their trophies at the ceremony.

ASFP reflects on 50th anniversary awards

ASFP said the awards provided an opportunity to review progress in passive fire protection as the association marked its 50th year.

The organisation added that the event showcased the breadth of activity across project delivery, training, innovation and advocacy.

Mike Ward, ASFP Managing Director, said: “The ASFP Awards 2025 highlighted the shared commitment across the sector to continued improvement.

“Each winner represents the very best of passive fire protection – a community dedicated to safeguarding lives and the future of the built environment.

“Thank you to all the nominees, sponsors, and our incredible team of internal staff who made this year happen so smoothly.

“It was an honour to host this industry-leading event on the ASFP’s 50th birthday year.

“2025 has been a whirlwind of successes, and we vow not to slow down anytime soon.

“2026 promises to be a year of innovation, expansion, and shared collaboration.

“See you all at next year’s awards.”

Siderise delivers fire integrity for NaturAL X façades in Birmingham

Siderise solution supports NaturAL X brick façades

Siderise has partnered with Ash & Lacy to provide a tested passive fire protection solution for the NaturAL X Brick Cladding System on Vita Student Gough Street in Birmingham.

According to Siderise, the student accommodation development is located at the Gough Street and Suffolk Street junction and is being built in response to demand for purpose-built student housing in the city.

The scheme is due to complete in summer 2026 and will comprise high quality apartments and shared spaces across two towers of 10 and 29 storeys.

Project elevations use a masonry brick appearance alongside curtain wall glazing to bring daylight into the building.

The project team selected Ash & Lacy’s NaturAL X Brick Cladding System, a lightweight mechanically fixed brick slip solution, instead of traditional masonry.

Siderise said the approach allows the building to retain the durability and visual character of brick while using rainscreen techniques that reduce cost, installation time, labour needs and space requirements compared with conventional construction.

To meet regulatory fire performance requirements and support a safe environment for future residents, Siderise was asked to design a passive fire protection solution that could demonstrate a two hour fire integrity rating for the façades.

Project specific fire testing at Siderise Innovation Centre

Siderise explained that its RH Horizontal and RV Vertical Cavity Barriers were re-engineered for use with mechanically fixed ventilated brick slip cladding system configurations.

To verify compatibility with the NaturAL X Brick Cladding System on Vita Student Gough Street, Siderise carried out project specific fire resistance tests at its Innovation Centre in Maesteg.

Testing used a representative wall build up and drew on several relevant standards identified for the project.

The company reported that the Siderise passive fire protection system achieved an E 120 and I 60 fire resistance rating during these assessments.

This performance met the project’s two hour integrity requirement and exceeded the results recorded for competing products.

For the curtain wall sections of the building envelope, the Siderise CW-FS120 Firestop was specified to provide two hours of fire resistance at the perimeter movement joint.

This was intended to maintain compartmentation around the slab edge, helping to limit fire spread between floors at the junction between the curtain wall and the floor structure.

Cavity barrier design supports build efficiency

Siderise stated that combining the NaturAL X Brick Cladding System with Siderise RH25 Horizontal and RV25 Vertical Brick Slip Cavity Barriers contributed to a quick and methodical installation process on site.

The RV25 Vertical Cavity Barriers use a lamella core that has been tested to show that it can operate under increased compression.

Because of this tested behaviour, the system did not require intumescent pads to be installed vertically between each support rail.

Siderise said this configuration reduced material use by removing those additional components.

The reduced component count also helped to streamline installation activities, allowing contractors to make full use of the time saving properties associated with brick slip cladding.

Site services guide installation of Siderise products

Siderise Site Services provided ongoing practical support to the installation teams working on Vita Student Gough Street.

According to the company, this included delivery of product installation training sessions before and during construction.

Siderise teams also installed benchmark areas on the project to establish reference examples for how the firestops and cavity barriers should be detailed.

These activities were followed by regular visits to the site to inspect the installation of the CW-FS120 Firestop and the RH25 and RV25 Brick Slip Cavity Barriers.

Siderise said these inspections checked that the products were being installed in line with its recommendations.

The site visits also aimed to confirm that installation matched the configuration that had been tested at the Siderise Innovation Centre.

Relevance for cladding designers and site teams

The Vita Student Gough Street project brings together a lightweight brick slip façade, curtain wall glazing and a tested passive fire protection package designed for a two hour fire integrity requirement.

For architects, fire engineers and building services engineers working on tall student accommodation or similar multi storey residential schemes, the example shows how project specific testing can be used to align cavity barrier design with a particular brick slip system and façade build up.

For façade contractors, fire-protection contractors and system installers, the use of Siderise RH25 and RV25 Brick Slip Cavity Barriers and CW-FS120 Firestop illustrates how product selection, lamella core compression performance and the removal of intumescent pads between rails can influence material use and installation sequencing.

The involvement of Siderise Site Services, including training, benchmark areas and regular inspections, also highlights how manufacturers can support on site teams in matching installed details to tested configurations on high rise student housing projects.

Promat sustainability data supports embodied carbon decisions in UK projects

Promat expands EPD coverage across portfolio

Promat has published Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for 86% of its products sold within the Etex Building Performance UK division, providing third-party verified sustainability data to support passive fire protection specification.

The UK based manufacturer said the move forms part of its ClearChange sustainability programme, which aims to increase transparency for customers using its board products.

According to the company, the published EPDs cover the majority of board products in its current portfolio and give specifiers a basis for comparing options on environmental performance.

Promat stated that the declarations are designed to help customers make more informed choices and, in some cases, reduce the environmental footprint of projects where its products are used.

The company added that EPDs also act as a tool for manufacturers, helping them identify material choices, production stages and supply chain elements that can reduce embodied carbon across their ranges.

EPDs detail embodied carbon and lifecycle data

Promat explained that its EPDs are the result of assessments that are independently verified for impartiality and aligned with ISO 14025 and EN 15804+A2/A1.

The firm said a dedicated internal team works to ensure that its products and technologies are progressively covered by EPDs.

Current EPDs include Promat medium density calcium silicate boards such as PROMATECT, SUPALUX and MASTERBOARD, which are used in building and industrial applications.

The declarations provide upfront embodied carbon figures for the boards and include information on packaging, waste treatment and end-of-life recycling.

Promat reported that this lifecycle approach allows the total embodied carbon of the passive fire protection boards to be evaluated rather than focusing only on initial production.

The company noted that this level of detail is intended to support customers who are working to meet environmental targets alongside fire-protection requirements.

Manufacturing measures support lower environmental impact

Promat said the EPDs also reflect measures taken within its manufacturing facilities to reduce environmental impact.

At its Belgium facility, the company uses a mix of hydropower, local combined heat and power (CHP) and solar energy to help mitigate the impact of the production process.

According to Promat, linking operational energy sources to product declarations gives customers additional context on how the boards are manufactured.

The manufacturer indicated that this information can be relevant for projects where both operational and embodied carbon are being assessed at design stage.

Promat added that its sustainability work is ongoing as part of the wider ClearChange programme.

ClearChange programme and customer support

Duncan Gardiner, Promat Platform Sustainability and Communications Manager, said: “We take our commitment to the environment seriously, and by offering EPDs for most of our current portfolio, we ensure our customers can do the same.

“There are some instances where EPDs are not possible, such as bespoke and complex applications, however, we are able to provide comprehensive support in these instances to ensure that our customers’ needs are met.

“Our ClearChange sustainability program demonstrates how we as a company will tackle sustainability challenges, and EPDs are the first step in ensuring we can make a tangible difference to our environmental impact.

“By delivering clear environmental impact data to support our customers, architects and specifiers, we hope to empower the industry to make informed decisions around sustainability, not only to meet regulations but to invest in a more sustainable construction sector.”

How Promat’s EPDs affect specification decisions

Promat’s publication of EPDs for most of its passive fire protection boards provides architects, fire engineering consultants and building services engineers with verified data that can be used directly in project assessments.

The lifecycle information, including upfront embodied carbon, packaging, waste treatment and end-of-life recycling routes, allows design teams to compare Promat products on environmental impact as well as fire-performance criteria.

For procurement officers, facility managers and fire-protection contractors, the declarations create a common reference point when evaluating board options for tenders or refurbishment projects that must meet corporate sustainability targets.

Risk assessors and system installers can also use the EPD data when providing advice on product selection in buildings where both fire safety and embodied carbon are under scrutiny.

By linking the ClearChange programme to independently verified EPDs that cover 86% of products within the Etex Building Performance UK division, Promat gives project teams information that can feed into building certification schemes and internal reporting processes.

Although bespoke or complex applications may not yet have EPDs, the company’s commitment to providing support in these cases means specifiers still have a route to obtain environmental information for planning purposes.

ARC secures LDC backing to scale passive fire and thermal solutions

ARC and LDC complete investment agreement

ARC Building Solutions has secured investment from LDC to support the growth of its passive fire protection and thermal solutions business in the UK.

The company said the deal backs its management team, led by CEO Neil Weeks, and is intended to fund increased production capacity, improved systems and expanded sales and support operations.

The transaction involves investment from LDC, a private equity investor that is part of Lloyds Banking Group.

Newable, a specialist UK small and medium-sized enterprise investor that has supported ARC since 2019, will reinvest alongside LDC.

ARC is based in Leeds and supplies products and systems for residential and commercial developments.

Passive fire protection focus for growth

According to the company, ARC manufactures certified and tested cavity barriers that provide up to four hours of fire integrity.

Its range also includes thermal insulation products designed to support both fire safety and energy efficiency outcomes.

The business provides technical system solutions that enable residential and commercial property developers to create buildings for people to live and work in.

ARC was founded in 2008 and has recorded long-term growth, supported by demand for safety critical and environmentally focused solutions.

The company plans to use the new investment to expand production capacity and enhance its systems so it can continue to serve its customer base.

Neil Weeks, CEO of ARC, said: “This is an important milestone in our mission to help the built environment to deliver more safe and sustainable buildings.

“We’ve known the LDC team for some time and are confident that with their backing, we will have the firepower and strategic support we need to scale our growth and continue to deliver for our customers.”

Board appointments and investor track record

The investment was led by LDC’s Yorkshire team, including Investment Director Will Scales, Partner and Head of Yorkshire Dan Smith and Investment Executive Connie Smith.

Following the transaction, Will Scales and Dan Smith will join ARC’s board as Non-Executive Directors.

They will sit alongside Kevin Sargeant, who joins as Non-Executive Chair.

The company said Kevin Sargeant brings nearly 30 years of board experience, including roles at Volution, Ventilair Group, Nuaire, Flexicon and Aqualisa.

LDC reported that in the last decade it has invested £660m in 35 industrial businesses with a combined enterprise value of £1.9bn.

Its investments span building products, automotive, aerospace, chemicals, packaging, manufacturing and energy and renewables.

In May 2024, LDC invested in Integrated Doorset Solutions Group, a testing, inspection, certification and compliance business in the fire door sector.

Newable and the ARC management team were advised by Momentum Corporate Finance and CMS.

LDC was advised by RSM, Shoosmiths, Dow Schofield Watts, PMSI and Collinson Grant.

Will Scales, Investment Director at LDC, added: “ARC has built an exceptional reputation for developing innovative, high-performance building safety products that are trusted by customers, and the business has an exciting future ahead.

“As part of Lloyds Banking Group, we have deep heritage in the built environment, and we’re looking forward to working closely with Neil and the team as they turn their ambitions into reality.”

How ARC’s investment plans affect project delivery

The investment in ARC’s passive fire protection and thermal insulation business is relevant for architects, building services engineers and developers involved in specifying products for new-build residential and commercial schemes.

The company manufactures tested cavity barriers with defined fire integrity performance and provides technical system solutions, so changes in its capacity and systems may influence design choices and coordination on future projects.

For system installers, fire-protection contractors and electrical contractors, the planned increase in production capacity and enhancement of support functions could affect product availability, technical assistance and site-level coordination when installing cavity barriers and related fire-safety measures.

Facility managers and risk assessors working with existing or planned ARC installations may also track the company’s investment plans and management changes, given its role in supplying safety critical and energy efficiency focused components for the built environment.

What Passive Fire Design still gets wrong and how ASFP addresses it

ASFP launches course to strengthen Passive Fire Design across the built environment

The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has developed a Passive Fire Protection Design Awareness Course in response to challenges with specification and design in the built environment, the organisation said.

According to the ASFP, the course addresses design-stage decisions that can lead to recurring and costly issues during construction and installation.

The organisation added that the training is available now.

The ASFP stated that the focus is on correct design choices for passive fire materials and systems.

It said the programme is aimed at improving understanding of technical and regulatory drivers for Passive Fire Design.

The organisation indicated that the aim is to support better decisions that improve fire safety and long-term performance.

Early design decisions drive later risk

The ASFP said early-stage choices can create problems at key interfaces during build and fit-out.

It pointed to service penetrations through fire-resisting compartment walls as a frequent source of error.

The organisation also cited integration between structural fire protection and compartmentation systems as an area where coordination often breaks down.

It noted that such issues can lead to additional cost and remedial work.

The ASFP positioned the new course as a route to reduce these known risks through better design understanding.

Course content focuses on interfaces

The ASFP said participants will examine common design issues including insufficient proof of concept.

It added that poor coordination of interfaces will be covered in detail.

The organisation said the course addresses the use of incompatible materials that can compromise fire performance.

It stated that the training explains the difference between insulation and integrity requirements within passive systems.

The ASFP confirmed that risks linked to overcladding intumescent-coated structural steelwork are included.

It noted that this content is intended to align design assumptions with tested performance.

Roles and responsibilities highlighted throughout

The ASFP said the training outlines responsibilities for designers, specifiers, contractors and building owners.

It added that correct design, installation and maintenance are presented as shared duties.

The organisation stated that the course reflects on how regulatory frameworks shape those duties.

It said the objective is to clarify who does what at each stage to maintain fire performance.

The ASFP indicated that clearer role definition can reduce coordination failures at interfaces.

Regulatory context and course availability

The ASFP said the programme reflects on how the Building Safety Act influences responsibilities and compliance standards.

It added that the course positions design choices within this regulatory context.

The organisation confirmed the Design Awareness Course is available now.

It stated that participants should gain a clearer view of the technical challenges driving good Passive Fire Design.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

Architects, building services engineers and fire engineers can use the ASFP course to address early-stage design decisions that later cause interface failures at service penetrations and compartment walls.

Specifiers and system installers can review proof of concept requirements to avoid pairing incompatible materials that compromise fire performance.

Structural engineers and steelwork contractors can examine the stated risks of overcladding intumescent-coated members and align choices with tested performance.

Contractors and facility managers can clarify the separation between insulation and integrity requirements so installed systems meet the intended fire-resistance outcomes.

Building owners can understand how the Building Safety Act frames responsibilities for design, installation and maintenance across the asset lifecycle.

Training officers can schedule participation now because the ASFP has confirmed the course is available.

New Promat study outlines best fire protection for structural steel buildings

Promat publishes whitepaper on protecting structural steel

Promat has published a new whitepaper analysing the most effective methods for protecting structural steel from fire.

The company said structural steel is now a widely used construction material that must be protected to maintain its load-bearing capacity during a fire.

According to Promat, the whitepaper compares fire protection board systems with specialist intumescent coatings, identifying where each option offers advantages for specific building types and design goals.

The document also discusses how increased data requirements under the Building Safety Act have driven demand for clearer evidence of performance.

Report reviews guidance under Building Regulations

Promat explained that the paper, titled Protecting structural steel: Fire board vs intumescent paint, focuses on the application of Part B of the Building Regulations and the Association for Fire Protection’s best practice guidance.

The company said it translates technical requirements into real-world building scenarios, reviewing how both systems perform in compartmented structures and in open-plan designs.

Promat added that the document highlights the importance of maintaining compartmentation in steel-framed buildings so that any fire remains contained within a defined area.

The company noted that while structural steel is non-combustible, it can lose its strength when exposed to extreme heat and must therefore be adequately protected under Approved Document B.

Promat calls for informed design and specification

Joshua Slack, Commercial Director at Promat UK, said: “Modern methods of building continue to evolve, and structural steel is now a leading choice in construction.

“For structural steel the need to maintain structural integrity should a fire break out is critical.

“Correctly specified Passive Fire Protection will protect steel from the rapid spread of fire for a set amount of time, allowing the blaze to be tackled by firefighters.

“With different options of passive fire protection and extensive testing available it is vital that this is supported by a clear understanding of how different methods and products will perform if needed.

“In publishing this whitepaper we aim to open the discussion and raise awareness of the best systems for use in different structural steel applications and identify what best practice looks like – and how this can be evidenced by up-to-date test data.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The whitepaper provides detailed comparisons of fire protection systems that are directly relevant to architects, fire engineers and building services professionals responsible for specifying materials under the Building Regulations.

It also offers guidance for fire-protection contractors and compliance officers involved in maintaining compartmentation and verifying system performance data under the Building Safety Act.

For those overseeing passive fire-protection design in commercial and industrial projects, the document serves as a technical resource for selecting the most appropriate system based on project type and required fire resistance.

AkzoNobel debuts Chartek 2218E for shop-applied steel protection in Abu Dhabi

Chartek 2218E launch announced at ADIPEC 2025

AkzoNobel said its protective coatings brand International has launched Chartek 2218E at ADIPEC 2025 in Abu Dhabi from 3–6 November, located at stand 15038.

The company described the product as the next generation of its epoxy passive fire protection solution within the Chartek range.

It said the new coating builds on more than 50 years of development in the portfolio.

International stated that the product focuses on enhanced performance and efficiency while maintaining established protection characteristics.

Single-coat, two-hour pool fire rating

According to the company, Chartek 2218E achieves a two-hour hydrocarbon pool fire rating in a single-coat application over Charlok mesh.

International said the coating is designed for shop-applied steel.

It is a patented boron-free epoxy intumescent, the firm added.

UL1709 thickness and weight claims

AkzoNobel said Chartek 2218E offers the lowest UL1709-certified thickness and weight in the industry for a W10x49 steel section.

The manufacturer linked these characteristics to installation efficiency on qualifying projects.

It positioned the product for large two-hour pool fire use cases in oil and gas assets.

Application efficiency and project impact

International stated that a streamlined application process enables faster project turnaround, lower energy consumption and reduced risk of delays.

The company said the coating can deliver up to 50% fewer application hours, up to 25% savings in shop-applied costs and up to a 25% reduction in material use.

It said these factors are intended to support both fabricators and applicators.

According to AkzoNobel, fewer hours, reduced material use and high durability can also lower maintenance costs.

The firm added that these benefits align with its aim to cut emissions by 50% across its value chain.

Durability, weathering and certification details

International said Chartek 2218E is part of a range with field-proven technology platforms.

The company stated that the product has been tested against ASTM D5894 and certified to UL2431 without a prescribed topcoat.

It added that this provides fire performance after weathering and allows a cosmetic topcoat to be specified without affecting long-term performance.

The firm said this combination is intended to give operators confidence that assets remain protected across the lifecycle.

Quotes from AkzoNobel representatives

Robin Wade, Global Fire Protection Manager at AkzoNobel, said: “Chartek 2218E represents the latest innovation in passive fire protection for the large two-hour pool fire market, which is critical for many oil and gas assets.

“It reflects our continued commitment to investing in innovation and sustainability in structural fire protection.

“Chartek 2218E can be applied in a single coat with Charlok mesh, maximizing productivity without compromising robustness and durability.

“Its patented polysiloxane-modified epoxy technology means steelwork can be stacked with minimal damage, enhancing throughput and overall fire efficiency.”

Andy Holt, Business Development Manager of AkzoNobel’s Middle East division, said: “Feedback from customers highlights that productivity and workshop efficiency remain some of the biggest challenges in oil and gas construction, and that’s exactly where Chartek 2218E delivers.

“Early demonstrations have been met with strong confidence from applicators and fabricators alike, who see the benefits first-hand in speed, consistency and ease of application.

“Maintaining that close collaboration with our customers is what drives continuous improvement and long-term trust.”

Visitor access and regional availability

According to the company, visitors to the ADIPEC stand can view product samples and speak with subject matter experts.

International said a dinner event on 5 November will include a presentation on Chartek 2218E efficiency and project value.

AkzoNobel stated the product will be available across the Middle East, South Asia and Australasia from November following the launch.

The firm said further regional rollouts are planned and that customers can contact local sales representatives for availability details.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

Procurement officers and equipment specifiers can assess a single-coat approach that the company says achieves a two-hour hydrocarbon pool fire rating over Charlok mesh.

Oil and gas safety officers and fire engineering consultants may examine the claim of lowest UL1709-certified thickness and weight for a W10x49 section, alongside stated savings in application hours and material use.

Fabricators and applicators can review the stated reductions of up to 50% in application hours, up to 25% in shop-applied costs and up to 25% in material use for planning and throughput.

Standards and certification bodies may note testing to ASTM D5894 and certification to UL2431 without a prescribed topcoat, which the company says maintains fire performance after weathering.

Promat expands specification team to meet Building Safety Act demand

Promat appoints new Project Specification Manager for South East operations

New appointment supports regional construction sector

Passive fire protection specialist Promat has appointed Dom Mason as Project Specification Manager to support customers across the South East.

Promat said the appointment will strengthen its regional coverage across North London, the Home Counties, Essex and East Anglia.

Mason will work as part of the wider UK team to assist with passive fire protection specification requirements for construction projects.

The company added that Mason brings extensive experience within the passive fire protection sector and a detailed understanding of the impact of recent industry regulations.

He is currently working towards the Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) Level 3 in Passive Fire Protection.

Focus on structural steel and large-scale projects

Promat explained that Mason’s work will focus on supporting structural steel projects, large commercial developments and high-rise internal fit-out schemes.

Mason said: “The Building Safety Act has driven major change in the industry, and the need for additional information and support at the specification stage.

“It also allows us to support best practice in the specification of passive fire protection, especially with the level of testing that Promat offers.

“This is a major benefit for customers looking for a more harmonised approach that can be assessed for use in a wider range of applications.

“Being able to provide customers with recommendation details is essential to helping meet demand for more tested solutions.

“I’m looking forward to engaging with existing and new customers as well as meeting up with some familiar faces across the industry.”

Supporting growth under Building Safety Act requirements

Promat said Mason’s appointment aligns with its growth strategy as demand increases for passive fire protection and supporting documentation in line with the Building Safety Act.

National Specification Manager Harvey Brown added: “Dom is a great asset to the team.

“His experience in supporting specification requirements for the Building Safety Regulator will be a real benefit to customers looking for focused support.”

Promat manufactures passive fire protection systems designed to contain the spread of fire, allowing safe evacuation and protecting the integrity of buildings and assets.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

The appointment of a new Project Specification Manager at Promat is directly relevant to building specifiers, architects, fire engineers and contractors working on construction projects in the South East.

Mason’s focus on structural steel, high-rise fit-outs and large commercial buildings aligns with areas most affected by the Building Safety Act’s increased requirements for transparency and tested passive fire protection systems.

Professionals involved in design, compliance and material specification will have access to additional technical support and tested data, improving assurance across regulated projects.

This development also highlights the industry’s continued response to post-Grenfell regulatory frameworks, particularly regarding evidence-based fire-protection design.

Wetherby Wall Systems launches InteriA retrofit solutions for solid wall properties in the UK

Wetherby Wall Systems introduces new retrofit solution

Wetherby Wall Systems has launched InteriA, a new Internal Wall Insulation (IWI) system designed to provide A-rated, moisture-open retrofit solutions for solid wall buildings in the UK.

The company, part of the ROCKWOOL Group, confirmed that InteriA was developed in response to growing demand for insulation systems that combine strong fire performance with effective moisture management.

The launch took place earlier this week and marks the latest addition to Wetherby’s retrofit portfolio.

Addressing challenges in insulation for solid wall buildings

Wetherby Wall Systems said Internal Wall Insulation remains essential for improving thermal efficiency where external upgrades are limited by planning, heritage or access constraints.

The company noted that the market has lacked a complete system capable of balancing fire safety and moisture control, both now recognised as central to government best practice guidance.

According to the manufacturer, InteriA is made entirely from A-rated, non-combustible stone wool components, meeting modern safety expectations while incorporating a moisture-open construction that allows walls to dry on both sides.

The company explained that this approach aligns with advice from the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS), which identifies moisture permeability as key to minimising condensation and safeguarding long-term building health.

Compliance, performance and sustainability

Wetherby Wall Systems said InteriA delivers a slim profile that enables refurbishment U-values with 100mm of insulation while supporting compliance with PAS 2035 and the Building Safety Act.

The system offers a 60-year design life, uses recyclable materials and can be integrated into the RockCycle waste recovery scheme.

The firm stated that installation has been engineered for minimal disruption and improved practicality, making it suitable for occupied dwellings and large-scale retrofit programmes.

Industry response to new A-rated system

Joe Ragdale, Technical Director at Wetherby Wall Systems, said: “InteriA has been developed in direct response to what the industry has been calling for: an A-rated, moisture-open internal wall solution.

“It has been carefully designed to give specifiers, housing providers and programme managers confidence that compliance, resident safety and building durability are all addressed within one system.

“By combining safety, sustainability and compliance, InteriA represents a significant step forward for IWI solutions and will play a valuable role in helping the UK meet its carbon reduction and energy efficiency targets.”

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

Fire engineers, housing providers and building services consultants involved in retrofit and refurbishment programmes will find this development directly relevant.

The InteriA system’s A-rated, non-combustible composition and alignment with the Building Safety Act address ongoing concerns over material compliance in occupied residential properties.

For specifiers, the inclusion of moisture-open design principles consistent with BEIS guidance supports safer long-term building performance by reducing risks associated with trapped moisture and condensation.

Programme managers and compliance officers overseeing decarbonisation or energy-efficiency schemes can also apply InteriA in cases where external insulation is not feasible, ensuring fire safety standards remain consistent with PAS 2035 expectations.