Fire safety upgrade rules clarified for strata buildings in NSW

Strata buildings may need fire safety upgrades in certain cases

Owners corporations in New South Wales may be legally required to upgrade fire safety systems in strata buildings, depending on the circumstances.

According to Building Commission NSW, requirements under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and its associated regulations may trigger these obligations.

Fire safety upgrades may be mandated through formal fire safety orders, or when a Development Application or Complying Development Certificate is submitted that affects the building’s use or structure.

The commission said upgrades may also be required when smoke alarm standards change or where existing systems no longer meet minimum performance requirements listed in a fire safety schedule.

Fire and Rescue NSW or local councils have the authority to issue fire safety orders under Division 9.3 of the EP&A Act.

These orders may compel owners to install or improve fire safety systems to bring buildings into full or partial compliance with the Building Code of Australia.

Building modifications may trigger compliance upgrades

Fire safety upgrades are not only ordered reactively but can also result from building modifications.

Building Commission NSW said a change in building use through a Development Application (DA) may require updated protection measures to match the new occupancy type.

It explained that fire safety features such as smoke detection, sprinkler systems, and emergency exits must align with the use classification under the Building Code of Australia.

The agency also noted that when new or proposed building work exceeds 50 percent of a building’s volume, fire protection systems may need to be reassessed.

Upgrades in these cases ensure consistency with category 1 fire safety provisions and structural requirements.

This also applies to Complying Development Certificates (CDCs), where assessments must consider current fire safety standards under sections 142 and 143 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.

Fire safety orders follow procedural steps

Building Commission NSW said local councils must follow a defined process before issuing a fire safety order.

They must notify the building owner and include the intent of the order, the terms, the compliance timeframe, and information on how to respond or appeal.

Owners have the right to make representations and can appeal to the Land and Environment Court if they dispute the order.

The commission stated that this is part of procedural fairness, and allows owners to seek negotiation on the type and timing of required works.

However, if Fire and Rescue NSW issues a fire safety order, there is no right of appeal unless the order restricts access or use of the property.

Routine maintenance does not require upgrades

According to Building Commission NSW, routine fire safety inspections or maintenance do not in themselves trigger an obligation to upgrade systems.

The organisation clarified that fire maintenance contractors cannot compel upgrades unless a formal order or regulatory process is involved.

It said building owners are only required to upgrade existing fire safety measures if they fail to meet the performance standard listed on the building’s fire safety schedule.

This schedule sets out which measures are in place and their required performance level.

The commission confirmed that as long as measures meet these standards, no further upgrades are needed, even if newer standards exist.

Smoke alarm requirements remain in place

Smoke alarm regulations also form part of the fire safety upgrade rules.

Building Commission NSW noted that smoke alarms must be installed in all dwellings and buildings where occupants sleep.

The required locations and technical specifications are detailed in Part 13 of the EP&A (Development Certification and Fire Safety) Regulation 2021.

These provisions ensure that all new development or changes in occupancy continue to meet minimum life safety requirements.

The commission stated that failure to comply with smoke alarm provisions may trigger a separate compliance process or enforcement action.

Fire safety upgrade rules clarified for strata buildings in NSW: Summary

Owners corporations may need to upgrade fire safety systems in strata buildings under specific legal triggers.

Building Commission NSW stated that these triggers include fire safety orders, development applications, or non-compliance with performance standards.

Fire safety orders can be issued by local councils or Fire and Rescue NSW under the EP&A Act.

Development applications involving structural changes or changes in use may require upgrades to meet Building Code of Australia standards.

Complying Development Certificates also require consideration of current fire safety measures.

Fire safety orders from councils must follow a process that includes notification and appeal rights.

Orders from Fire and Rescue NSW cannot be appealed unless they restrict access.

Routine maintenance does not require upgrades unless the system no longer meets the listed performance standard.

Smoke alarms must be installed in sleeping areas, with technical requirements set by regulation.

BESA suspends 14 UK companies over audit non-compliance

BESA enforces audit standards with suspensions

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has confirmed the suspension of 14 member companies in the United Kingdom following failures to meet its Competence Assessment Standard.

According to BESA, the suspensions followed a formal audit process carried out by a UKAS-accredited body within the BESA Group.

The Association said the decision was made by its Council, which is responsible for governance, and reflects its commitment to quality and safety across the building services sector.

All 14 firms failed to satisfy the conditions required under the BESA Competence Assessment Standard, which addresses business practices, insurance, financial solvency, health and safety, and technical capability.

The audit criteria align with the Build UK Common Assessment Standard and are mandatory for both new applicants and existing BESA members.

Competence Assessment Standard sets benchmark

BESA explained that its Competence Assessment Standard serves as the foundation for assessing company compliance.

The Association said the standard requires member companies to undergo a technical on-site audit, with checklists referencing current industry practices and regulations.

This includes evaluating a company’s ability to carry out work safely, consistently, and to appropriate technical specifications.

According to BESA, the audit process is intended to provide assurance to clients, contractors, and the general public.

The Association noted that failure to meet the audit threshold leads to corrective support where possible, but may result in suspension if compliance is not achieved.

Leadership comments on accountability and consequence

BESA Chief Executive Officer David Frise said: “BESA has never been afraid to robustly defend its remit and constitution.”

Frise added: “We do not suspend members lightly but take our wider responsibilities to the industry and its ultimate clients – building occupants – extremely seriously.”

Frise continued: “Last week’s Grenfell: Uncovered documentary on Netflix was a timely reminder of why we must do everything we can to maintain the highest possible standards.”

He said: “It should remind us that every decision we make has a consequence – whether in the short-term or much further down the road for the people who inhabit buildings.”

Frise also stated: “The country should be able to depend on its building services industry to deliver work to the highest possible standards.”

Suspensions reflect enforcement approach

The Association said it views suspension as a last resort, only pursued when all other options to support improvement have been exhausted.

Frise said: “We have never been afraid to suspend members who don’t meet our standards.”

He explained: “It is always a last resort as we would much rather work with companies to help them improve, but when it is clear that is not possible, we have demonstrated that we will take the ultimate sanction.”

BESA stated that its role includes protecting the reputation of the wider engineering services industry and ensuring public confidence in building safety.

The Association added that it will continue to monitor compliance through ongoing audits and provide public access to its updated member register.

Alignment with national standards and public trust

BESA said its audit approach is consistent with wider industry moves to raise competence and trust in construction-related services.

The Association confirmed that the audit structure is aligned with the Build UK Common Assessment Standard.

It stated that this alignment ensures BESA members meet expectations from main contractors and regulatory frameworks introduced after the Grenfell Tower fire.

BESA said that the audit’s third-party nature, conducted by an accredited group entity, helps remove conflicts of interest and strengthens reliability.

The Association maintains that publicly listing audited members gives clients and stakeholders visibility into which companies meet the defined standard.

BESA suspends 14 UK companies over audit non-compliance: Summary

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has suspended 14 member companies.

The decision was made following failure to meet its Competence Assessment Standard.

The audit was carried out by a UKAS-accredited body within the BESA Group.

The standard covers financial solvency, insurance, technical proficiency, and safety.

It is aligned with the Build UK Common Assessment Standard.

The BESA Council is responsible for governance and approved the suspension.

BESA Chief Executive Officer David Frise said suspensions were not taken lightly.

Frise referenced the Grenfell: Uncovered documentary as a reminder of standards.

Suspensions are considered a last resort if support efforts do not succeed.

BESA provides a public register of fully audited members.

Audits include technical site checks and documentation reviews.

The process aims to reassure clients, contractors, and the public.

BESA stated it would continue to enforce compliance through audits.

The Association said it remains committed to industry accountability.

All 14 suspended companies are based in the United Kingdom.

Fire Angel: Data-led solutions needed for UK housing safety, says Beechener

Widespread safety issues identified in RSH inspections

On 30 April 2025, the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) published judgements following inspections of 18 local councils across England.

According to the regulator, the assessments found several cases of non-compliance with consumer standards across social housing stock.

The findings included outdated property surveys, uncompleted fire safety actions and repair backlogs, and inadequate systems for addressing tenant concerns.

Fire Angel Business Development Manager Andrew Beechener said the report reflected systemic failures that could place vulnerable tenants at increased risk.

Beechener said: “The judgments published by the RSH have revealed multiple failures by landlords across the country to meet consumer standards in social housing properties.

“With vulnerable people accounting for more than a quarter of social housing residents in the UK, it becomes even more critical to be equipped with up to date information to mitigate risks to safety.

“The Regulator of Social Housing is a cornerstone of independent safeguarding for tenants in public sector accommodation.

“This recent report by the body highlights the need for smarter solutions to improve safety and to provide sharper insight of housing stock in order to protect individual residents under the duty of care of housing associations.”

Technology can support early identification of risk

In response to the regulator’s findings, Fire Angel highlighted how connected technologies could support housing providers in detecting issues earlier and reducing potential harm.

Beechener said: “Connected technology can provide real-time information on building disrepair, damp and mould, and safety alarm triggers – therefore providing social landlords with a picture of risk in individual properties across a housing portfolio.

“It also brings greater transparency and the opportunity for two-way communication between landlords and tenants.”

The company outlined how the use of Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) can allow social landlords to analyse building data more effectively and take pre-emptive steps.

According to Beechener, the aim is to move from reactive approaches to proactive intervention supported by data.

Fire Angel example shows real-time safety alerts

Fire Angel’s own connected platform, Predict®, uses data collected from IoT-enabled devices to create a live risk profile of properties.

Beechener explained how its system works by learning from activity patterns and triggering alerts when signs of danger emerge.

Beechener said: “FireAngel’s Predict®, as an example of this, uses real-time data from IoT-enabled devices and AI to assess safety risk by identifying usage patterns and attributing a risk level.

“An example of this could be a notification of the high frequency of a smoke alarm being triggered the hallway.

“This information creates a window of opportunity in which prompt, early intervention not only mitigates cost but can prevent a problem from becoming a crisis.

“This would be acted upon by Fire & Rescue Services, social worker or supporting function within the property management, resulting in a pre-emptive action to reduce the risk of a life-threatening situation.”

Predictive data can improve tenant engagement

In addition to improving oversight of housing stock, Fire Angel noted that connected systems can help foster better tenant–landlord communication.

Beechener said such tools provide more responsive safety services and can allow tenants to feel more secure in their homes.

The technology also enables landlords to respond more quickly to issues and to demonstrate compliance with safety requirements.

Beechener added: “By introducing connected technologies such as IoT and AI, housing associations can be smarter in order to better protect tenants, whilst providing peace of mind and reassurance to tenants.”

RSH judgements stress need for strategic reform

The RSH judgements cover multiple local authority housing providers in England.

They form part of a wider effort to ensure compliance with the Social Housing Regulation Act and to raise consumer standards.

The regulator has stated that all landlords must have accurate data, timely repairs, and systems that allow tenants to raise concerns.

The April 2025 report reflects a broader trend in the housing sector, where digital tools are increasingly being looked to as a means of managing complex portfolios.

Fire Angel has argued that without embracing such tools, risks to resident safety may remain hidden until incidents occur.

Fire Angel: Data-led solutions needed for UK housing safety, says Beechener: Summary

The Regulator of Social Housing published inspection outcomes for 18 councils on 30 April 2025.

The regulator reported failures to meet consumer standards across social housing properties in England.

Issues included outdated property surveys, fire safety action backlogs, and poor tenant complaint systems.

Andrew Beechener of Fire Angel commented on the findings in a public statement.

Beechener said data and predictive tools are needed to monitor and manage risk.

Fire Angel stated that connected systems allow landlords to assess safety in real time.

Beechener explained how Fire Angel’s Predict® uses AI and IoT to detect risk early.

The company said early detection allows for intervention before risks escalate.

Beechener added that connected technologies can improve landlord–tenant communication.

Fire Angel said the RSH report supports the case for adopting smarter housing safety systems.

Are private firms compromising building control in England?

Panel will examine commercial conflicts in building control

The Building Control Independent Panel (BCIP) has been established to assess conflicts of interest and capacity concerns in the building control system in England, as reported by the Building Control Independent Panel.

The panel will examine whether those with commercial interests should be allowed to carry out building control functions and whether all such functions should instead be centralised under a national authority.

These questions were raised in the final report of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and form the basis of the panel’s Terms of Reference.

Working with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) and stakeholders, the BCIP will collect evidence on the persistence and effect of conflicts of interest and workforce limitations in both private and local authority building control services.

The panel will also evaluate potential changes that could limit or mitigate these issues, including the use of additional oversight or regulatory tools.

Evidence gathering will extend beyond Grenfell recommendations

The Building Control Independent Panel stated that its review will extend further than the questions posed by the Grenfell Inquiry.

It will examine different decision-making models for building control, using a risk-based approach that considers the type of building and scale of work involved.

The panel will evaluate what levels of inspection, supervision and enforcement are achievable and necessary across building types and timescales.

It will also review existing legislative powers in the Building Safety Act 2022, Building Act 1984 and related regulations before determining whether new legislation may be required.

The panel has also been tasked with considering whether safeguards could enable customer choice to continue in lower-risk buildings while improving reliability and public confidence.

The panel confirmed it would provide advice on how any required system transitions could be managed.

Wider policy aims and housing targets will be considered

The BCIP will align its review with the government’s broader building safety and housing policy goals.

The panel said it will assess how the building control system can help the government meet its aim to deliver 1.5 million new safe homes during this Parliament and beyond.

It will evaluate how proposals for a Single Construction Regulator and a Chief Construction Adviser could support a reformed building control function.

It will also explore how building control could be delivered collaboratively across combined local authorities in support of England’s devolution agenda, as outlined in the English Devolution White Paper.

According to the panel, opportunities for efficiency through data, digitisation and shared services will be examined in relation to oversight by local authorities and the BSR.

Key interdependencies and workforce issues under review

The panel will consider interdependencies with other building safety policy priorities already identified by MHCLG and the BSR.

It will examine building control workforce competence and capacity, performance concerns across both local authority and private sector providers, and the effectiveness of current regulatory protections.

The review will also assess the impact of any new requirements on current training and recruitment systems.

Additional interdependencies include proposed updates to the technical Parts of the Building Regulations, how warranty schemes relate to control systems, and whether reforms to the 2010 Building Regulations and Charges Regulations are needed.

Information sharing between building control bodies and the BSR or government will be reviewed as part of wider data reform.

Membership, working model and reporting schedule set

Dame Judith Hackitt has been appointed Chair of the BCIP.

Panel members include the Rt Hon Nick Raynsford, Dr David Snowball, Elaine Bailey and Ken Rivers.

The group is supported by a Secretariat staffed by MHCLG and advised by policy and delivery teams from both MHCLG and the Building Safety Regulator.

The panel intends to publish an initial assessment in June 2025 and seek further evidence from stakeholders before issuing final recommendations later in the year.

The Terms of Engagement confirm the panel is expected to meet for a minimum of five sessions and dedicate at least 60 hours to the process, with an option to extend to 90 hours after a mid-point review.

All members have completed due diligence checks and are required to declare new conflicts of interest during their appointment.

The Chair will oversee strategic direction, engagement with the sector and media, and be responsible for final outputs and recommendations to ministers.

Building control panel launched to assess oversight and conflict risks: Summary

The Building Control Independent Panel has been formed to advise the UK Government on future oversight of building control in England.

The panel will consider whether commercial involvement should continue in building control services.

It will also assess the potential role of a national authority in delivering building control functions.

The panel will collect evidence on conflicts of interest and workforce capacity issues.

It will consider risks, proportionality and delivery timescales across building types.

The group will evaluate current legal powers and determine if new legislation is needed.

It will align with housing delivery targets and other policy reforms including devolution.

The panel will assess the feasibility of customer choice alongside greater oversight.

It will investigate performance issues across public and private sector building control.

It will review training, data, technical standards, and warranty scheme relationships.

The panel is chaired by Dame Judith Hackitt and supported by MHCLG.

An initial assessment will be published in June 2025.

Grenfell Tower fire eight years later: Inquiry findings, survivor demands and safety concerns

What’s changed since Grenfell? Survivors demand justice as unsafe buildings remain

Eight years on from the Grenfell Tower fire that claimed 72 lives, survivors, bereaved families and campaigners continue to press for justice, accountability and change.

A series of statements, investigations and memorial events mark the anniversary, amid ongoing frustration at the lack of prosecutions and the continued presence of unsafe buildings across the UK.

This unified report draws on coverage from The Guardian, BBC News, the Fire Protection Association (FPA), and the London Fire Brigade (LFB), reflecting equally on the legal, social, policy and safety dimensions of the aftermath.

Continued careers spark anger over lack of accountability

Officials involved in Grenfell still working in housing roles

A report by the Guardian noted that several individuals criticised during the Grenfell Tower Inquiry have continued to work in housing, building safety or government roles.

Laura Johnson, former Director of Housing at the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), was found by the inquiry to have delayed fire door safety upgrades and promoted cost-cutting changes that led to the use of combustible cladding.

She is currently interim Director of Property and Development at Barnet Homes.

Brian Martin and industry roles despite safety failings

Brian Martin, a civil servant described as a “single point of failure” on building regulations prior to the fire, continued working within government and has since served as an expert witness in cladding tribunal cases.

Martin, who the inquiry found had foreseen the dangers of ACM cladding but failed to act, was still involved in planning at the Ministry of Housing until at least 2022.

Corporate figures implicated but unprosecuted

Deborah French, former Arconic sales manager, admitted during the inquiry that she knew the panels sold could burn but did not disclose this to clients.

Despite this, she held a senior cladding position until 2023.

Nicholas Paget-Brown, RBKC’s leader at the time of the fire, now runs a public policy consultancy.

Survivors and campaigners described these developments as “a deep and bitter injustice”, while a Metropolitan Police investigation into potential offences including corporate manslaughter remains ongoing.

Bereaved call for turning point as Netflix documentary exposes industry knowledge

Documentary reveals internal company knowledge of risk

The BBC highlighted calls from bereaved parent Marcio Gomes, who appears in a new Netflix documentary Grenfell: Uncovered, for the anniversary to mark a turning point in the campaign for justice.

Internal Arconic emails reported by The Sunday Times and shown in the film indicate that senior executive Diana Perreiah knew the cladding should not have been used on tall buildings, two years before the fire.

“No accident”: families blame firms’ conduct

Gomes, whose son Logan was stillborn after the fire, said the disaster was “very much avoidable” and the product of “companies prioritising profits ahead of people’s lives”.

He urged the public to “start shouting” about the role of manufacturers and to avoid their products.

The inquiry had already concluded that Arconic, Celotex and Kingspan engaged in misleading practices and created false markets for unsafe insulation.

Ongoing government investigation into contractor misconduct

The Cabinet Office confirmed in February that seven companies are being investigated for potential breaches under the Procurement Act 2023.

The BBC reported that possible bans from public contracts are being considered for Arconic, Kingspan, Saint-Gobain, Exova, Rydon, Studio E and Harley Facades.

Unsafe buildings persist across London as survivors call for change

Over 1,400 buildings still require evacuation plans

Figures from the London Fire Brigade show 1,448 residential buildings in London currently require simultaneous evacuation plans, meaning residents cannot safely remain in place during a fire.

This includes 883 buildings over 8 metres tall.

The policy change reflects concerns over compartmentation failures similar to those seen at Grenfell.

Grenfell United criticise pace of change

Edward Daffarn, a Grenfell survivor and campaigner, said the figures show “people are still going to sleep in buildings that aren’t safe”.

He called for stronger action and hoped the Netflix documentary would pressure government to prevent companies involved from receiving public money.

Daffarn said: “We haven’t got justice yet.

“It feels wrong to be pulling the tower down while so much remains unresolved.”

Long delay in criminal charges criticised

Bereaved families have described the near-decade-long wait for criminal charges as “unbearable”.

The government has said final decisions on charges will not be made until the end of 2026.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Housing stated that progress on remediating unsafe buildings has been too slow, and announced a Remediation Acceleration Plan aimed at fixing all identified buildings by 2029.

Fire Protection Association: Final anniversary before tower deconstruction prompts reflection

Eighth anniversary marked with events and memorials

According to the Fire Protection Association, this year’s Grenfell anniversary was commemorated through community events, memorial services and the return of the Grenfell United Silent Walk.

The tower was lit with 72 beams of green light, symbolising each life lost.

Government prepares to dismantle tower

In a June 2025 site update, the government confirmed that preparatory work is under way to begin dismantling the Grenfell Tower later this year.

Officials acknowledged the site’s personal significance and promised to approach the work “respectfully and carefully”.

Community fears erasure without justice

Councillor Elizabeth Campbell, leader of Kensington and Chelsea Council, said: “This anniversary is particularly poignant… and the last before the Tower is sensitively taken down.”

She reiterated the council’s responsibility for past failings and commitment to the 45 post-inquiry reform pledges.

Grenfell United described the decision to dismantle the tower without any prosecutions as a threat to public memory, writing: “They want the tower out of sight. But we won’t stop until the criminals are brought to justice.”

London Fire Brigade: Reforms implemented, but commitment to change continues

LFB completes Phase 1 Inquiry reforms

London Fire Commissioner Andy Roe said the Brigade had implemented all recommendations directed at it from Phase 1 of the inquiry, including policy, equipment and training reforms.

“We will never become complacent,” Roe said, adding that further improvements are needed to prevent another tragedy.

High-rise fire response transformed

Roe highlighted upgrades in how the Brigade responds to high-rise fires, a key concern after the inquiry found that “stay put” advice contributed to the death toll.

New procedures now allow for faster evacuations and better communication during such incidents.

Ongoing remembrance and engagement with survivors

Roe reiterated that the LFB is committed to honouring the memory of those lost and listening to the Grenfell community.

He said: “We owe it to them to continue to listen, make changes and drive forward improvements.”

Grenfell Tower fire eight years later: Inquiry findings, survivor demands and safety concerns: Summary

Seventy-two people died in the Grenfell Tower fire on 14 June 2017.

Eight years later, survivors and bereaved families continue to demand prosecutions and accountability.

Several individuals criticised in the public inquiry remain in roles connected to housing and fire safety.

The Metropolitan Police is investigating potential charges including corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter.

No criminal charges have been filed as of June 2025.

Internal emails revealed that senior staff at Arconic knew the cladding was unsafe before the fire.

The UK government is investigating seven companies for potential professional misconduct.

More than 1,400 residential buildings in London currently have simultaneous evacuation plans in place.

The Grenfell Tower is scheduled to be dismantled starting autumn 2025.

Community memorial events took place to mark the anniversary.

The London Fire Brigade states it has completed all Phase 1 Inquiry recommendations.

Campaigners continue to call for justice, policy change and building safety reform.

Russ Timpson joins Global HSE Group to support façade fire safety

Timpson to support tall building fire safety in the UK

Russ Timpson, a Chartered Fire Engineer and founder of the Tall Building Fire Safety Network, has joined the UK-based consultancy Global HSE Group.

According to Global HSE Group, Timpson will contribute to façade safety and staff development, bringing specialist knowledge to support the company’s compliance and reporting processes.

Timpson’s previous roles include service as a Royal Navy submariner and local authority firefighter. He has also led responses to complex incidents such as the Terminal 1 fire at Heathrow Airport.

The company said his recent work organising the Tall Building Fire Safety Network provides practical insight into the changing safety landscape for high-rise buildings in the UK.

The appointment comes as Global HSE Group’s fire safety division continues to manage hundreds of FRAEW assessments and building safety cases, with ongoing BSR-related work.

Chartered engineer to strengthen façade fire strategy

Global HSE Group stated that Timpson will be working closely with its façades team.

His remit includes advising on evolving tall building regulations and reviewing internal processes to support accurate building assessments.

The company added that he will also help drive professional development within the team.

According to the company, Timpson’s industry experience and understanding of regulatory systems make him well-positioned to guide complex project reviews.

Timpson has previously contributed to major infrastructure projects including Heathrow Terminal 5 and the Gatwick Airport Skyway.

The organisation said his appointment reflects its aim to improve fire safety knowledge across all project stages.

Director highlights shared goals and professional respect

Ross O’Loughlin, Director of Global HSE Group, said: “I am delighted to welcome Russ to our growing and very capable team of experienced and qualified fire engineers. I have known Russ personally, for some time, and always enjoy the challenges he sets the industry, through his work on Tall Buildings Fire Safety Network.

“Our discussions around getting fire safety in tall buildings right and his candid and supportive nature, made the appointment exciting for the whole team.

“His experience and ability to adapt to change and innovation made him the perfect fit for galvanising our consultancy and challenging us to continue to develop and succeed.”

Industry collaboration led to the appointment

Timpson’s appointment follows previous collaborations with Global HSE Group.

He has worked with the team through his leadership role in the Tall Building Fire Safety Network.

Timpson said: “I’ve known the Global HSE Group team for a while now, through the industry and the Tall Building Fire Safety Network and have always been deeply impressed by the quality of their work, their profound fire knowledge, and the professionalism of their staff.

“I’m excited to now be part of that team, lending my experience to their projects and contributing to the ongoing development of best practices in fire safety.”

Fire safety consultancy continues internal growth

The company stated that the appointment coincides with a period of expansion for its consultancy services.

Global HSE Group said it conducted hundreds of FRAEW assessments and 75 building safety cases last year.

Its recent work also includes support for Building Safety Regulator applications and related compliance projects.

The group added that expanding its internal capabilities is essential to manage sector demands and changing legislation.

According to the company, Timpson’s role will help reinforce its technical review processes and improve output quality across services.

Russ Timpson joins Global HSE Group to support façade fire safety: Summary

Russ Timpson has joined Global HSE Group as a Chartered Fire Engineer.

He will work with the façades team and support internal professional development.

Timpson previously led the Tall Building Fire Safety Network.

His past work includes incident response at Heathrow Terminal 1.

He has contributed to infrastructure projects at Heathrow and Gatwick airports.

The appointment was announced by Global HSE Group on 13 June 2025.

Ross O’Loughlin, Director of Global HSE Group, welcomed the appointment.

Timpson said he looks forward to contributing to the firm’s work.

The company stated the appointment supports internal growth and ongoing BSR projects.

Global HSE Group is based in the UK.

Waking Watch reliance continues in UK high-rise fire safety

Waking Watch demand highest in London

Demand for Waking Watch services in London is over 150 percent higher than in any other UK region, according to new analysis by ProFM Group.

The security and facilities company reported that this reflects the concentration of high-rise buildings in the capital, where 11.7 percent of homes are in high-rise blocks compared to 2.7 percent across England.

The firm said that while these services offer a temporary safeguard, they should not be seen as a permanent replacement for integrated fire safety systems.

Emily Macaulay, Client Services Director at ProFM Group, said: “Waking Watch services are the plaster, not the cure.”

Macaulay explained that while human-led monitoring is useful when alarm systems are absent or out of action, it is intended as a stopgap during remediation works or system upgrades.

Waking Watch services still common eight years after Grenfell

ProFM Group reported that human patrols remain a key feature in many buildings still awaiting installation of permanent fire safety measures.

According to the company, Waking Watch involves trained operatives maintaining constant patrols to detect fire signs and initiate evacuations.

The National Fire Chiefs Council and the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities continue to recommend the installation of automatic fire detection systems in high-risk buildings.

However, ProFM Group said that installation timelines, building-specific challenges and resident concerns mean that some buildings continue to rely on manual monitoring.

Macaulay said: “Permanent systems are always going to be preferable.

“They work automatically, cover the whole building and don’t rely on someone being there to spot the danger.

“But getting them installed isn’t always quick – and that’s where [Waking Watch services] come in, providing eyes, ears and immediate response until those systems are in place.”

Guidance issued for responsible service provision

ProFM Group said it has identified a set of operational standards to ensure Waking Watch services are delivered to high standards while remaining transparent about their temporary role.

The company advises maintaining consistency in personnel to support familiarity and site knowledge.

It added that guards should be fully briefed on building-specific evacuation procedures and reporting protocols.

The company said that any hazards such as blocked exits or fire door breaches must be reported immediately.

It also highlighted the importance of communication with residents to avoid misunderstanding about the scope and limits of Waking Watch arrangements.

Macaulay said: “They need to know what Waking Watch is, and what it isn’t.”

Safety systems installation still lagging in legacy buildings

ProFM Group stated that while national fire incident figures have decreased over the past decade, the upgrade of fire detection systems in many buildings has not kept pace.

According to UK Government data, fire incidents in buildings fell from 46,817 in 2014 to 38,275 in 2024.

Despite this, Macaulay noted that legacy housing stock still presents challenges for alarm and evacuation system upgrades.

The company emphasised that temporary measures should never become long-term substitutes for engineered safety infrastructure.

Macaulay said: “The least we can do is make sure the change [Grenfell] triggered continues.
“That means permanent safety systems, not just stopgaps, and residents empowered to ask the right questions.”

Human monitoring still widely used during safety system delays

ProFM Group reiterated that the Waking Watch model remains active because of delays in implementing permanent solutions in affected properties.

It noted that public trust in human-led patrols has varied, with some residents expressing concern about consistency and oversight.

The company explained that high-integrity patrols must include real-time incident logging and escalation.

Macaulay added: “They play a crucial role when alarm systems are lacking or out of action, but they’re a temporary safeguard – designed to fill the gap between risk identification and permanent solutions like integrated alarms and evacuation systems.”

Waking Watch reliance continues in UK high-rise fire safety: Summary

ProFM Group reported that Waking Watch demand is 157 percent higher in London than in other UK regions.

The company said this is due to the higher proportion of high-rise homes in the capital.

Emily Macaulay, Client Services Director at ProFM Group, said Waking Watch is a temporary safeguard.

ProFM Group said the service should be phased out when permanent systems are installed.

The company issued five key practices to maintain quality in human-led fire watch services.

It recommended stable patrol teams, building-specific integration, real-time reporting and resident communication.

ProFM Group said UK building fire incidents dropped from 46,817 in 2014 to 38,275 in 2024.

The firm stated that older buildings face challenges in installing automated alarm systems.

ProFM Group emphasised that Waking Watch must not replace engineered safety infrastructure.

Macaulay said that residents should be informed and able to assess fire safety measures.

Planning properly for every person: Evac+Chair highlights the need for inclusive evacuation planning and ongoing training

Evac+Chair outlines inclusive, compliant evacuation planning and the critical role of training and maintenance

For over 40 years, Evac+Chair has played a pivotal role in shaping how organisations approach emergency evacuation.

As the world’s leading manufacturer of evacuation chairs, the company is synonymous with inclusive fire safety.

Its instantly recognisable yellow and blue chairs can be found in thousands of buildings across the UK and globally, offering vital peace of mind for businesses and the public alike.

Founded in 1982, Evac+Chair began with a singular goal: to ensure that no one is left behind during an emergency evacuation.

Today, that mission continues through a holistic approach encompassing product innovation, comprehensive training and meticulous maintenance programmes – all underpinned by a proficient understanding of the regulatory landscape and the real-life risks that businesses face.

In today’s evolving working environment, shaped by climate change, terrorism, fires and other emergencies, organisations must have robust emergency plans that include both evacuation and invacuation procedures.

Evacuation involves safely moving people out of a building, while invacuation means guiding them to a secure internal location when external threats make it unsafe to leave.

To ensure everyone’s safety, organisations must have clear protocols, the right equipment, staff training and regular emergency drills.

Navigating a complex legal framework

UK fire safety legislation is among the most comprehensive in the world.

The cornerstone is the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety Order) 2005, amended by the Fire Safety Act 2021.

It places clear legal duties on the “responsible person”, typically a business owner or property manager, to ensure provisions are in place to evacuate.

In addition, Article 17 of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety Order) 2005 requires that fire safety devices, including evacuation equipment, are maintained in good working order.

Articles 18 and 21 further detail and emphasise the importance of appointing competent individuals and providing regular training for staff.

However, enforcement data suggests a worrying disconnect between legislation and implementation.

The Home Office Official Statistics on Fire Prevention and Protection, in the UK, found that in the 2023/24 financial year, fire and rescue services issued 2,823 formal notices following unsatisfactory fire safety audits – a 24% increase on the previous year.

Prosecutions under Article 32, which penalises the failure to maintain life-saving equipment, rose by 79%.

Beyond fire legislation, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 imposes a general duty of care on employers to protect the safety of staff and visitors.

The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) 1998 go further, explicitly requiring that all workplace equipment is regularly inspected and maintained.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has acted decisively in recent years, prosecuting nearly 10% of PUWER-related breaches.

Failures typically stem from a lack of training or inadequate maintenance, both of which can have fatal consequences in an emergency.

The lack of readiness

Despite the regulatory clarity, Evac+Chair’s own research indicates significant gaps in preparedness.

The company’s independent study titled the ‘Risky Business’ report in 2023, which surveyed key decision-makers across multiple sectors, found that 22% had only a partial understanding of their legal evacuation responsibilities.

The study also revealed a lack of foresight in planning for temporary impairments.

19% of organisations failed to include staff or visitors with temporary mobility issues such as someone who is on crutches or someone in the late stages of pregnancy, in their evacuation plans.

Perhaps most concerning, one in ten businesses acknowledged having no strategy in place to evacuate people with permanent mobility impairments.

These findings underline a systemic issue: equipment alone is not enough.

Without trained personnel and regular practice, even the best evacuation solutions can fall short in high-pressure scenarios.

Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) and General Emergency Evacuation Plans (GEEPs) are critical tools in ensuring the safety of individuals with varying mobility needs.

Failure to implement these plans effectively not only puts lives at risk but may also carry serious legal implications for organisations under equality and health and safety legislation.

Regular practice, comprehensive training and clear evacuation procedures make emergency evacuations more efficient and significantly safer for both the passenger and the operator.

It’s not just about compliance; it’s about doing the right thing to protect every individual in an emergency situation.

Building confidence through training

Evac+Chair’s comprehensive training programmes instill confidence in users, ensuring they are prepared not just in principle but in practice.

The most widely adopted course, especially for larger organisations, the Key Trainer Course offers a sustainable solution by enabling internal teams to deliver this vital training themselves.

This four-hour session teaches how to cascade the training and certify others and what to look out for to ensure someone is competent.

There is also the Operator Training Course, which runs for two and a half hours and blends essential theory with hands-on experience.

Delegates learn how to operate the Evac+Chair correctly and safely during stairwell evacuations where time is limited and every second counts.

Correct operation is crucial, not only for the safety of the passenger but also for the wellbeing of the operator.

Certification is valid for three years, providing organisations with documented evidence of compliance, while helping maintain high standards of emergency readiness.

Regular training is essential to keeping skills refreshed, this improves the efficiency of an evacuation and avoids injury to the operator or the passenger in preparation for a real emergency.

These sessions align with guidance from the Fire Safety Risk Assessment Supplementary Guide, which recommends evacuation drills at least twice a year.

Ultimately, it’s not just about compliance, it’s about being ready to respond quickly, confidently and safely when it matters most.

Maintenance: a non-negotiable priority

An Evac+Chair is classified as a Class I Medical Device and, as such, is subject to stringent maintenance requirements under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) 1998.

Regular servicing is not just a recommendation – it’s a legal and operational necessity.

To ensure continued reliability, Evac+Chair recommend maintenance should only be carried out by certified engineers using genuine parts.

Evac+Chair’s annual service programme includes a thorough inspection and the replacement of any worn or damaged components, such as belts, buckles and wheels, guaranteeing that each unit remains fully operational and ready to perform flawlessly in an emergency.

Regular maintenance also helps to extend the product’s lifetime, providing long-term value whilst safeguarding the wellbeing of both passengers and operators.

Evac+Chair offers service contracts ranging from one to five years, giving organisations the flexibility to plan their budgets while remaining fully compliant.

The company also recommends quarterly visual checks by in-house teams, helping to spot signs of wear or damage before they escalate into serious issues.

The importance of proactive maintenance cannot be overstated.

During an evacuation, a faulty Evac+Chair could cost precious minutes – or worse, lives.

By investing in routine servicing, organisations demonstrate both legal compliance and a moral commitment to the wellbeing of everyone on their premises.

The human cost of inaction

While the legal risks are considerable, moral obligation is equally strong.

Failing to provide evacuation procedures for people with mobility impairments is not only a breach of duty; it is a denial of basic human rights.

Evac+Chair’s range of evacuation chairs are used daily in premises across the globe.

They are often the difference between inclusion and exclusion, between a safe evacuation and an avoidable tragedy.

Whenever there is a set of stairs, there should be the means to escape.

No building should be considered fully accessible unless it includes a viable evacuation solution for all individuals, regardless of mobility.

Providing an Evac+Chair is not just about meeting compliance standards; it’s about ensuring dignity, equality and safety for everyone in an emergency.

As Nathaniel Thomas-Hall, Head of Export and Innovation at Evac+Chair, states, “Failure to prepare is preparing to fail.

We have the tools, technology and training to make inclusive fire safety a reality – what’s missing in many cases is the will to act before it’s too late.”

A call to the fire safety community

Evac+Chair believes that the fire safety community has a vital role to play in bridging the current compliance gap.

Fire professionals, consultants, and enforcement officers must continue to raise awareness about the critical importance of evacuation readiness.

This includes championing not just the installation of evacuation chairs but their ongoing use, upkeep and the skills development that surrounds them.

The company is also calling on policymakers to introduce clearer mandates around evacuation planning for mobility-impaired individuals.

As buildings become more complex and diverse in use, evacuation strategies must keep pace, particularly as societies move toward greater inclusion and accessibility.

Businesses can no longer afford to treat evacuation planning as a tick-box exercise.

The combination of robust equipment, professional training and diligent maintenance is the only way to ensure readiness when seconds count.

Evac+Chair has led the change in emergency evacuation for over 40 years, but the responsibility for preparedness lies with every organisation.

With the right systems and mindset, inclusive evacuation can be both a legal certainty and a moral standard.

The message is clear: evacuation planning is not optional, and neither is inclusivity.

It is time to ensure that every person, regardless of mobility, has a safe route out when the alarm sounds.

This was originally published in the June 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here

Fire safety control unit introduced for small UK buildings

Compact smoke ventilation system designed for compliance

WindowMaster has launched a new smoke and heat exhaust ventilation (SHEV) control unit designed for smaller building applications.

According to WindowMaster, the new WSC 106 unit is suited to stairwells, restaurants and commercial buildings in the UK that require fire safety compliance alongside day-to-day ventilation.

The company said the unit delivers up to 6 amps of output current and integrates with standard ±24V DC actuators and MotorLink® enhanced actuators to open windows during a fire event.

WSC 106 designed for fast smoke and heat extraction

The manufacturer explained that the WSC 106 responds immediately to smoke detection, opening windows to release heat, smoke and toxic gases while allowing fresh air into the building.

It stated that the system is intended to maintain clear escape routes during fire evacuation, improve visibility and reduce smoke inhalation risks.

The control unit is CE marked under EN 12101-10 and certified to ISO 21927-9, which WindowMaster said ensures the system complies with UK and European fire safety regulations.

Features support both fire response and daily ventilation

The company highlighted several additional features of the WSC 106, including simplified wiring using BUS technology, which allows for more efficient connection of smoke detectors, alarm systems and switches.

Eight DIP switches allow users to configure the behaviour of window and vent openings depending on the application.

It also noted that the unit supports integration with both standard 24V drives and MotorLink® systems, as well as pyrotechnic gas generators.

Dual-purpose ventilation system for building projects

WindowMaster stated that the WSC 106 is intended to support both emergency smoke extraction and everyday ventilation in modern buildings.

The company said the unit can be used in low-carbon design projects and helps maintain indoor air quality while meeting life safety compliance needs.

Erik Boyter, CEO of WindowMaster, said: “In a fire emergency, every second counts.

“The WSC 106 is designed to respond instantly, ensuring smoke is rapidly extracted to keep escape routes clear, improve visibility, and ultimately protect lives.

“Its compact size, seamless integration, and ease of installation make it a no-brainer for UK architects, contractors, and fire safety engineers looking for a smart, future-proof solution that prioritises both compliance and occupant safety.”

Fire safety control unit introduced for small UK buildings: Summary

WindowMaster has launched the WSC 106 compact SHEV control unit.

The unit is designed for use in small to medium-sized UK buildings.

It provides 6 amps of output current.

It is intended for use in stairwells, restaurants and commercial spaces.

It responds to smoke detection by opening windows for ventilation.

The unit is CE marked to EN 12101-10 and complies with ISO 21927-9.

It works with both standard ±24V DC and MotorLink® actuators.

It includes BUS wiring, eight DIP switches, and pyrotechnic gas generator compatibility.

The unit supports daily ventilation needs in addition to emergency use.

WindowMaster said the unit supports fire safety and indoor air quality.

Winter fire safety in NSW: Government campaign urges smoke alarm checks

NSW sees winter rise in fire-related deaths and injuries

The New South Wales Government has launched Fire and Rescue NSW’s annual Winter Fire Safety campaign, highlighting a seasonal increase in home fire incidents and associated risks.

According to the New South Wales Government, the campaign began as winter temperatures led to a 13 percent increase in house fires during colder months.

Between 1 June and 30 August 2024, over 1,000 fires occurred in homes across the state, resulting in 12 fatalities and injuries to more than 100 people.

Smoke alarm failures linked to nearly half of winter fires

Fire and Rescue NSW reported that 44 percent of winter home fires in 2024 occurred in dwellings where either no smoke alarm was installed or the device failed to activate.

It added that 42 percent of fires during this period began in household kitchens.

Across all of 2024, there were 3,674 residential fires in NSW, resulting in 25 deaths.

In 45 percent of these cases, no working smoke alarm was present.

Lithium-ion battery safety a continuing concern

The campaign also draws attention to hazards related to lithium-ion batteries.

Fire and Rescue NSW stated that 115 battery-related incidents were recorded in the state during 2024 so far.

Of these, 42 incidents were linked to e-bikes and e-scooters.

The service warned that charging, storing or disposing of these devices incorrectly may cause fires or explosions.

Community support efforts launched alongside campaign

Fire and Rescue NSW said that its crews would be visiting households to carry out free safety checks and offer guidance on preventing winter fire risks, including battery charging behaviour.

Firefighters will also install smoke alarms at no cost where needed.

The public can request a free home fire safety visit and alarm installation at any time through the Fire and Rescue NSW website.

Minister for Emergency Services Jihad Dib said:
“This winter the NSW Government wants to ensure households have a working smoke alarm installed.

“They can give residents the crucial seconds needed to get everyone out safely.

“In my own community of Bankstown, dozens of fires broke out in homes last winter, and more than half of those homes didn’t have a working smoke alarm installed.

“If you need help, our firefighters are here for you.

To test a smoke alarm please book a safety visit through the Fire and Rescue NSW website or by calling your local fire station.”

Fire and Rescue NSW Commissioner Jeremy Fewtrell said:
“The risk of fires in our homes increases during the colder months as we try to stay warm and cook more hot meals.

“Keep looking when cooking – never leave cooking unattended and don’t throw water onto a fat fire as it will intensify the flames – use a fire blanket or extinguisher instead.”

Targeted data shows high-risk areas across NSW

Fire and Rescue NSW published a breakdown of the number of winter house fires in 2024 by local government area (LGA), along with the proportion of incidents in homes without functioning smoke alarms.

Canterbury-Bankstown experienced the most fires (63), with 51 percent of homes lacking a working alarm.

Wollongong had 30 house fires, and 60 percent were reported to have no operational smoke alarm.

Other LGAs with high fire counts included Blacktown (53), Central Coast (45), and Cumberland (43), each reporting a large share of fires occurring in homes without functioning alarms.

Winter fire safety in NSW: Summary

The New South Wales Government has launched Fire and Rescue NSW’s Winter Fire Safety campaign.

It reported a 13 percent increase in house fires during winter 2024 compared to the rest of the year.

Between June and August 2024, there were over 1,000 home fires across NSW.

These incidents resulted in 12 deaths and more than 100 injuries.

In 44 percent of winter home fires, there was no working smoke alarm or the device failed.

Kitchen fires made up 42 percent of the total during this period.

Throughout 2024, 3,674 residential fires occurred in the state.

These led to 25 deaths, and 45 percent of homes affected had no operational smoke alarm.

Fire and Rescue NSW recorded 115 lithium-ion battery incidents in 2024 so far.

Of those, 42 were related to e-bikes and e-scooters.

The agency warned against unsafe charging, storage and disposal practices.

Free safety checks and smoke alarm installations are being offered by firefighters across NSW.

The campaign encourages residents to book a fire safety visit through the service’s website.