IFE sets out education pathway for fire safety professionals

Fire safety and the International Day of Education

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) has published commentary marking the United Nations’ International Day of Education and linking education to the fire engineering profession.

In the article, the IFE notes that the United Nations General Assembly proclaimed 24 January as International Day of Education to recognise the role education plays in fostering peace and sustainable development.

It describes the day as a reminder that education in fire engineering is connected to saving lives.

The IFE writes: “Education is the foundation of fire safety – without knowledge, we cannot design, innovate or plan to protect communities.”

What the IFE says education should cover

The article sets out the IFE’s view that competence and compliance in fire engineering are non-negotiable because decisions can affect public safety, including choices about materials in a school and evacuation planning for a high-rise building.

It adds that continuous learning helps fire engineers keep up with changing risks, regulations and technology.

The IFE also argues that education should start before professional qualifications and should include teaching children about fire safety and introducing fire engineering as a career option.

It says the IFE offers free Student membership to exam candidates and individuals in fire-related studies, giving access to learning resources, networks and opportunities without financial constraints.

How the IFE describes lifelong learning and CPD

The commentary states that learning continues after qualification and describes CPD as central to maintaining competence and adapting to new challenges.

It says the IFE has built a programme of events, qualifications, resources and initiatives, including an online CPD Hub with webinar recordings and global learning resources, plus a new monthly CPD email introduced this year.

The article includes a perspective from Mabel Higgins, Founder and Director of MH Fire Safety (MHFS), who said: “Becoming a member of the Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) has been invaluable for my professional growth and contribution to the wider fire safety industry.

“It has connected me with a diverse network of experts, enabling the exchange of ideas, technical insights, and best practices across multiple fire engineering disciplines.

“This collaboration has deepened my understanding of emerging challenges and innovations within the built environment.”

It also says the IFE has incorporated digital exams into its educational offering so that fire safety professionals can gain internationally recognised qualifications regardless of location.

SFPE announces April 2026 Singapore fire safety conference programme

SFPE Conference dates and location confirmed

The Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) has announced that its 2026 SFPE Fire Safety Conference on Performance-Based Design will take place in Singapore from 15-17 April 2026.

SFPE said the event was announced on Wednesday 7 January 2026 in Gaithersburg, Maryland.

The conference is held every other year and the programme will run across three days.

Programme scope and presentation format

SFPE said the programme includes more than 45 presentations.

It said there will be nine case study team presentations.

SFPE said the event will also include discussion panels, networking events and live discussions.

It said topics listed for the programme include evacuation, timber structures and performance-based design frameworks and applications.

SFPE also listed sustainability design, digitalization, fire dynamics and battery fire hazards among the planned subject areas.

It said the programme includes the latest research and innovation projects related to performance-based design.

SFPE chief executive on conference aims

Chris Jelenewicz, PE, FSFPE, Chief Executive Officer, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, stated: “We are thrilled to bring the 16th SFPE Fire Safety Conference on Performance-Based Design to Singapore in April 2026 — a truly global forum where fire protection engineers, regulators, educators, researchers, and industry partners come together to explore the cutting edge of performance-based fire safety engineering,”

“This biennial conference is known around the world as the premier event for those advancing robust, innovative fire and life safety solutions.

“With three days of technical presentations, real-world case studies, dynamic discussion, and unparalleled networking opportunities, attendees will gain deep insight into current and future trends in performance-based regulatory systems, modelling and risk analysis, and collaborative design approaches that help shape safer built environments for communities everywhere.”

Co-chairs outline performance-based design priorities

Conference Co-Chairs Joseph Vaughn, PE, SET, Jensen Hughes, Macao SAR, and David Stacy, PE, Summit Fire Consulting, United States, said: “As performance-based design continues to mature globally, it is essential that we strengthen the technical foundations that support engineering judgment, promote consistency in regulatory application, and improve the reliability of analytical tools.

“This year’s program features real-world case studies and emerging research to advance performance-based design worldwide.

“Our goal is to equip practitioners with the technical depth and shared understanding needed to deliver robust, defensible, and innovative fire safety solutions.

“SFPE invites professionals across the globe to join us in shaping the future of our industry.”

Pre-conference seminar and course focus

SFPE said one conference seminar is planned ahead of the main event and is available at a discounted rate when bundled with conference registration.

It said the seminar is titled Substantiating the Suitability of a Fire Model.

SFPE said the course will take place on 13-14 April 2026.

It said the instructor is Bryan Klein.

SFPE said the one-and-a-half-day course will cover defining the problem, model selection, verification and validation and uncertainty analysis.

It said the course is listed as 10 PDHs.

Expo and registration details

SFPE said the conference will include an expo with companies showcasing products and offerings.

It directed readers to its website for the full conference schedule, sponsorship opportunities and registration.

What is a K Class Fire Extinguisher Used For?

Fire extinguishers are critical tools for stopping small fires before they spread, but it’s vital to use the correct type for each kind of fire. 

Using the wrong extinguisher can even make a fire worse.

Spraying water on a kitchen grease fire will only spread the flames. 

One particularly dangerous class of fire occurs in kitchens when cooking oils or fats overheat. 

These high-temperature grease fires. 

These are classified as Class K fires in the US, equivalent to Class F in the UK. 

They ignite suddenly and burn intensely. 

They require a special kind of extinguisher formulated specifically to handle burning oil and fat safely. 

This is where the Class K fire extinguisher comes into play: it is designed to tackle blazing cooking oils and keep a kitchen fire from turning into a disaster.

What is a K Class Fire Extinguisher Used For?

what is k class fire extinguisher

A Class K fire extinguisher is used for fires involving cooking oils, fats, and grease.

These are the types of fires that erupt in kitchens due to overheated oil. 

This extinguisher is specifically designed to combat blazing oil in deep fryers, frying pans, griddles, and other commercial cooking equipment. 

According to fire safety standards, a Class K extinguisher is the only effective means to safely put out fires fueled by vegetable oils, animal fats, or grease in cooking appliances.

What Makes a Class K Fire Extinguisher Unique

What makes the Class K extinguisher unique is its extinguishing agent. 

Unlike a water or dry powder extinguisher, a Class K unit contains a special wet chemical solution.

This is often potassium acetate or similar compounds. 

These chemical solutions are extremely effective on hot grease fires. 

When you discharge a Class K extinguisher onto burning oil, the wet chemical comes out as a fine mist and reacts with the fat. 

This reaction forms a thick, soapy foam blanket over the oil.

This process is called saponification

The foam smothers the flames by sealing off the oil from oxygen and also cools the oil below its ignition temperature, preventing the fire from reigniting.

Basically, the Class K extinguisher both starves the fire of oxygen and removes the heat, which are two essential elements needed for the fire to continue burning.

Why Can’t I Use a Different Fire Extinguisher on a K Class Fire?

why cant use other type fire extinguisher

You cannot substitute other types of fire extinguishers for a Class K fire because grease fires behave very differently from ordinary combustibles or flammable liquid fires

Fires involving cooking oil or fat require Class K extinguishers because no other extinguisher type can reliably or safely extinguish them. 

Using the wrong type can be ineffective or downright dangerous. 

Here’s why Class K fires need their own extinguisher and why other extinguishers won’t work:

Water Will Make a Grease Fire Worse

Never throw water on a burning pan of oil. 

Water is denser than oil, so it sinks below the burning grease and instantly turns into steam. 

As it evaporates, it expands to about 1,600 times its volume, erupting upward and carrying burning oil droplets with it. 

This causes the fire to explode and spread. 

Instead of cooling the fire, a splash of water can fling the flames to new areas (and possibly onto anyone nearby). 

Water and oil don’t mix, and using water will spread a Class K fire.

Standard Foam or Powder Extinguishers Aren’t Effective

Class B foam or dry powder extinguishers, which work for petrol or chemical fires, are not formulated for the extreme high-temperature conditions of cooking oil fires. 

Deep fryer oil can reach temperatures far above the ignition point of other flammable liquids.

A regular dry chemical extinguisher might knock down the flames briefly, but it does not cool the oil sufficiently. 

The oil can remain hot enough to reignite on its own a moment later.

This is essentially a ticking time bomb of fire. 

Also, dry chemical agents (like monoammonium phosphate powders) can form a crust on top of the oil that looks like it’s out, while underneath the oil is still burning or hot. 

When that crust is disturbed or if heat builds up again, the fire can flash back. 

Because they lack the cooling and smothering foam effect, normal Class B/C extinguishers often fail to prevent re-ignition of grease fires.

Co₂ (Carbon Dioxide) Extinguishers Aren’t Suitable

A CO₂ extinguisher fights fire by flooding the area with carbon dioxide to displace oxygen and cool the flames. 

However, with a Class K fire, CO₂ will only cool the surface of the oil while the deeper oil remains extremely hot. 

Once the CO₂ gas dissipates, the oxygen returns and the still-hot oil can reignite itself. 

Moreover, the high-pressure discharge from a CO₂ extinguisher can splatter the burning oil around, potentially spreading the fire to new areas. 

Thus, CO₂ might temporarily appear to put out a grease fire, but the fire is very likely to come roaring back.

How to Use a K Class Fire Extinguisher

how to use k class fire extinguisher

If a cooking oil fire breaks out and it’s safe for you to attempt extinguishing it, you should follow proper steps to use the Class K fire extinguisher. 

Using this extinguisher is similar to using any portable extinguisher, but there are a few additional considerations for grease fires. 

Always remember the acronym PASS:

  • Pull
  • Aim
  • Squeeze
  • Sweep

This acronym outlines the basic steps for knowing how to use a fire extinguisher:

  • Pull the safety pin out of the extinguisher’s handle. This pin prevents accidental discharge; pulling it will unlock the handle.
  • Aim the nozzle or hose at the base of the fire, not at the flames. In a grease fire, that means aim where the oil is burning (the surface of the oil). You want to hit the burning oil directly with the extinguishing agent.
  • Squeeze the handle slowly and evenly. This will start the flow of the wet chemical agent. Class K extinguishers are typically designed to discharge in a controlled, gentle spray to avoid splashing the oil.
  • Sweep the nozzle from side to side across the base of the fire while continuing to aim at the oil. Cover the entire area that’s on fire with the mist, and keep spraying until the flames are completely out.

Keeping Safe

While performing these steps, maintain a safe distance. 

It’s recommended to start about 8 to 10 feet (roughly 3 metres) back from the fire and move forward carefully as the flames subside. 

Holding the extinguisher upright, direct the spray low and evenly over the burning oil. 

The wet chemical will create a foamy layer as it contacts the hot grease. 

Make sure to coat the whole surface of the burning oil with this foam. 

This ensures that the fire is fully smothered and cooled. 

Class K extinguishers are engineered to discharge at a lower pressure than other types precisely to avoid splattering the burning oil. 

However, a steady hand control is important to keep the spray directed where it’s needed.

As you fight the fire with the extinguisher, avoid getting too close to splattering grease and never attempt to carry a burning pan outside.

Let the extinguisher do the work of dousing the flames. 

Keep discharging the agent until you’re absolutely sure the fire is out. 

After Extinguishing the Fire

After the flames appear to be extinguished, watch the area closely for a minute or two in case of re-ignition. 

The wet chemical foam should prevent the oil from reigniting, but it’s wise to be vigilant. 

Once everything is under control, ventilate the area if possible. 

Remember to call the fire brigade or emergency services if the fire was significant or if there’s any doubt it might flare up again. 

Also, any used extinguisher will need to be recharged or replaced promptly.

Suppression Systems

If the kitchen has an automatic hood fire suppression system, activate that first or ensure it has activated before using the portable extinguisher. 

The hood system will release its own suppressing agent and often shut off the heat source to the cooking equipment. 

This reduces the intensity of the fire and prevents new fuel from feeding it, making it safer and more effective when you follow up with the handheld Class K extinguisher.

Where are K Class Fire Extinguishers Usually Found?

where k class fire extinguisher found

Class K fire extinguishers are typically found anywhere there is a significant risk of cooking oil or grease fires. 

This means they are most often located in commercial and institutional kitchens. 

These are some of the common places you’ll see Class K extinguishers installed and ready for use:

Restaurant and Café Kitchens

Restaurants, diners, cafeterias, and coffee shops with kitchens all contain cooking appliances that use oil or grease. 

Class K extinguishers are normally required in these kitchens, often positioned near deep fryers or grill areas.

Hotel and Catering Kitchens

Hotel restaurants, banquet hall kitchens, and catering companies prepare food on a large scale and usually have multiple high-temperature cooking stations. 

These sites will have Class K units handy in the cooking areas to address any fryer or skillet fires.

Food Trucks and Mobile Kitchens

Food trucks, street food stalls, and mobile catering vans often operate with compact deep fryers or woks in a tight space. 

A Class K extinguisher is crucial in these environments due to the elevated risk of grease fires in a confined area.

Institutional and Cafeteria Kitchens

Large kitchens in schools, universities, healthcare buildings, nursing homes, prisons, and other institutions commonly cook for many people using industrial-sized equipment. 

These facilities will have Class K extinguishers in the galley or kitchen area to meet fire codes and protect occupants.

Bakeries and Other Food Prep Facilities

Bakeries, pastry shops, or any food production facility that involves frying or high temperature oils will also keep a Class K extinguisher nearby. 

Any facility with commercial cooking equipment is likely to have one.

Key Takeaways

Class K fire extinguishers play a crucial role in kitchen safety. 

They are uniquely formulated to tackle the high-temperature oil and grease fires that frequently occur in cooking environments.

These are fires that other extinguishers simply cannot deal with safely. 

Statistics show that a large share of fires in restaurants and cafes start in the kitchen, where hot cooking equipment can ignite oils and fats. 

Having a Class K extinguisher on the premises (and knowing how to use it) is therefore an essential safeguard for anyone who operates commercial cooking equipment.

A Class K fire extinguisher is a kitchen’s best defense against one of its most perilous fire hazards, and ensures that a fire doesn’t turn into a tragedy.

From concept to completion: Telgian reveals the 10 steps to sprinkler approval

Jacob Ford, Fire Sprinkler Design Team Lead at Telgian Engineering and Consulting, outlines the essential stages of system design and regulatory approval

Fire is a powerful force of nature that can be detrimental to buildings and even entire cities. To create a safer, more effective society, there must be a way to control or limit the potential danger posed by fire. That is where fire protection engineering, and one of its subdisciplines, fire sprinkler design, come into play.  

Fire engineering is a diverse field that draws on many engineering disciplines. This field encompasses a broad range of pursuits, all with the common goal of minimising or preventing fire damage, achieved through various fire prevention and protection methods. Although these two concepts may sound redundant, they each offer their own distinct advantages toward the overall goal of fire control.  

Fire prevention vs. fire protection 

Fire prevention encompasses various strategies to prevent fires from starting in the first place, including:  Risk analysis; Human behaviour in fire events; Building design layout; Programs and procedures for fire events.

Fire Protection involves systems that are put in place to protect life and property in the event of a fire. These systems can be either active or passive. Examples of active fire protection systems: Fire sprinkler systems and fire alarm systems. Fire sprinkler and alarm systems activate in the event of a fire and provide a means of assisting in controlling the fire or warning of its presence.  

Examples of passive fire protection systems: Smoke control (smoke barriers, separation); Coatings and casings; Fire-retardant building materials (fire walls, fire doors).  

The role of fire sprinkler design 

Fire sprinkler systems are the most common form of fire protection. For these systems to be installed and effectively protect against fire, they have to be designed to a predetermined standard. That is where the fire sprinkler designer comes in.  

Fire sprinkler designers utilise many fields of engineering, including: 

  • Electrical: Electrical design fundamentals will be used when the designer coordinates integration with the fire alarm system or when coordinating power supply requirements for fire pump selection and design.  
  • Mechanical/Piping: Mechanical and piping layout skills are used to create the fire sprinkler piping system and to coordinate with elements of other disciplines.  
  • Fluid Dynamics/Hydraulics: The designer demonstrates knowledge of fluid dynamics and hydraulics by designing the system in a hydraulically efficient manner and validating it through hydraulic calculations.  
  • Structural: A fire sprinkler designer must understand structural elements and how buildings are constructed. This knowledge is crucial for routing the system, as some architectural elements cannot be covered or hidden, and piping can only be hung from certain structural members.  
  • Civil:  A basic understanding of civil engineering is required for tasks such as fire hydrant placement, soil classifications to determine the need for seismic bracing, and thrust block calculations for underground pipes. 

Key design considerations 

When a designer begins a project, they must consider the following factors.  

Building layout: Certain architectural and structural elements may limit the placement of system components; Building size will determine the number of systems needed to protect it; and portions of the building that are not conditioned or exposed to the elements may warrant the inclusion of dry or pre-action systems.  

Building occupancy and use: Different occupancies correspond to varying levels of risk and potential fire severity. The designer will select the type of system that best protects the hazard with minimal risk. For example, the designer should choose a pre-action system for a data center to minimise the potential for pipes to leak onto the servers. This system fills the pipes with air unless there is a fire event. 

Local codes and standards: Although there are national standards for the design of fire sprinkler systems, various AHJs (authorities having jurisdiction) have the choice to adopt past iterations of these standards, which can vary in their requirements, and alter and amend sections of the code for their region.  

Geographic area: The location of a facility determines the need for seismic bracing on the sprinkler system if it is in an area subject to earthquakes. Also, local weather may necessitate a dry sprinkler system.  

Steps in the fire sprinkler design process 

During the design phase of a project, the sprinkler designer will go through several steps as outlined below. 

  1. Consult with the building owner/client. 

Coordinating with the building owner/client is crucial to the design process, as this is where the scope of work is determined. The owner may be able to move some storage out of their building to avoid a sprinkler system upgrade, or they may want to strengthen what they already have in anticipation of the building’s occupancy changing in the future.  

  1. Analyse the water supply. 

This is typically done by performing a fire hydrant flow test as outlined in NFPA 291. During a flow test, the person performing the test opens a fire hydrant and measures the resulting water flow. They place a gauge onto another hydrant to measure both static (no flow) pressure and residual (flowing) pressure. The designer sometimes performs this test, but it may be done by others. 

  1. Determine applicable codes and standards. 

The designer, or in some cases a consultant, coordinates with the AHJ to determine what codes and standards apply to the project’s location.  

  1. Identify the hazard or commodity. 

The commodity being protected will be a factor in determining the system type and the correct density for hydraulic calculations. 

  1. Identify the sprinkler system type. 

Based on the previous steps, the designer should have enough information to determine the best type of sprinkler system to protect the building(s). 

  1. Lay out the sprinklers and system piping. 

The design layout must follow NFPA 13, manufacturers’ data sheets, and any local codes or amendments. Based on the sprinkler layout, the designer will then lay out the system piping, making sure to connect the heads to each other via the piping and routing around obstacles in the most hydraulically efficient manner. 

  1. Perform the hydraulic calculations. 

The designer must verify the system layout with hydraulic calculations utilising the water source determined during the water supply analysis phase. The designer will calculate the most hydraulically demanding area of the system to a predetermined density (volume of water over area) that has been decided upon (typically derived from code) based on the hazard. The results of these calculations will determine if the water supply is adequate to support the system. If the supply is insufficient, the designer can upsize the piping or add a water tank/fire pump.  A fire pump will aid the water supply if a lack of pressure is the issue, and a tank will supply water if volume is the issue. 

  1. Obtain AHJ approval of the designs. 

The fire sprinkler system design needs to be reviewed and approved by the local authority having jurisdiction.  

  1. Prepare for system installation. 

The designer will then move to stock listing, which is the process of selecting the materials required for fabrication based on the design plans. Based on this list of materials, the designer will order the correct components, then the system will be fabricated and installed.  

  1.  Await system inspection and final approval. 

The AHJ performs an inspection following the system installation. The designer is typically involved during this phase directly through design and/or indirectly through answering questions and being a resource for those performing the inspection. 

Fire sprinkler design field 

The role of the fire sprinkler designer is instrumental throughout the process of developing a fire sprinkler system, making it an invaluable and much-needed role in the fire protection engineering field. Designers can find careers with engineering firms, fire sprinkler contractors, and property insurance companies. 

As long as buildings are being built, there will be a need for fire sprinkler designers, making it a stable and future-proof profession. 

About the Author

Jacob Ford, Fire Sprinkler Design Team Lead at Telgian Engineering and Consulting, has been in the fire sprinkler industry for 19 plus years. He is NICET certified in Water Based Systems Layout and has worked on a wide variety of projects ranging from foam systems, clean agent, aircraft hangers, hospitals, gamma knife facility, clean rooms, large data centers, sports training facilities, etc. Starting his career as an apprentice pipefitter and moving to a designer role shortly after college, Jacob is a demonstrated leader in the fire protection field having held several leadership, training, consulting, and management roles in both the contracting and engineering sectors of fire protection.

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

IFE and FIA fire safety guidance targets serviced apartments and aparthotels in England

Fire safety grey area inside aparthotels

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE), working with the Fire Industry Association (FIA), has published an introductory note on serviced apartments and aparthotels and the fire safety challenges they can create for design, compliance and building management in England.

The IFE said serviced apartments and aparthotels are increasingly common in UK urban developments and mixed-use buildings, with rental durations ranging from single nights to months or longer.

It said this creates uncertainty because the units can resemble standard flats but operate more like hotels in terms of occupant turnover and familiarity with the building.

The note said this grey area can affect both building design decisions and the way fire safety is managed during occupation.

Why occupancy affects compliance routes

The IFE said many fire regulations treat buildings containing “dwellings” differently from buildings that do not, and that the definition can be complex.

It said duration of occupancy is often a key factor, with daily rentals less likely to be classed as dwellings and year-long rentals more likely to meet that definition.

Regulation 5 of the Building Regulations sets out scenarios that can count as a “material change of use”, including changes to the number of dwellings or converting a building into a hotel.

The IFE said converting an existing building to serviced apartments or an aparthotel is likely to be treated as a material change of use, requiring compliance with the functional requirements of the Building Regulations.

In this scenario, the “non-worsening” criteria often applied to existing buildings would not apply.

The IFE said the trend of converting redundant city-centre offices into aparthotels or flats can be complex and may fall short of purpose-built residential standards if not carried out competently.

Fire safety strategy and evacuation decisions

The IFE said blocks of flats are often designed around a stay put approach, based on compartmentation and occupants being familiar with escape routes and procedures.

It said serviced apartments and aparthotels can challenge that approach because short-term occupants may be unfamiliar with the building, which can point towards simultaneous evacuation in some cases.

The note said any move towards simultaneous evacuation would bring different design and management needs, such as enhanced detection and alarm, clear signage, escape route management and a continuous staff presence with evacuation planning.

It said a hybrid approach may suit some buildings, where an initial smoke detector activation triggers an alarm within the flat of origin and escalates to full evacuation if a heat detector activates in a key location.

The IFE said this would need careful consideration alongside management response expectations and any smoke control system designed around one flat evacuating at a time.

Sprinklers or alternative automatic suppression systems should be considered as part of the overall strategy.

The note added that a hotel-based approach can also be challenging because many aparthotels include cooking facilities, which are not typically present in hotel bedrooms.

HRB status and fire risk assessment scope

The IFE said the status of a building as a Higher Risk Building (HRB) in England can depend on height and whether it contains at least two residential units, a care home or a hospital.

It said the definition of “residential units” excludes hotels, and that it is currently unclear how serviced apartments and aparthotels fit within HRB occupancy definitions.

The IFE said this distinction affects whether building control applications go to a Local Authority or Registered Building Control Approver for non-HRBs, or to the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) for HRBs.

It said HRBs in occupation must register with the BSR and have a Building Safety Case in place, and that failing to do so could be a criminal offence.

The note said changes in how units are rented could change the regulatory position, including scenarios where longer-term rentals lead to units being classed as dwellings.

The IFE said fire risk assessment scope can also change under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, because dwellings are excluded but non-dwellings must be included.

It said if units are not dwellings, fire risk assessments would need to cover the apartments themselves as well as common areas, affecting responsibilities, enforcement and compliance.

What this means for building fire roles

Fire engineers and fire engineering consultants may need to confirm intended occupancy patterns early, because the note links rental duration to how terms like “dwelling” may be interpreted in practice.

Risk assessors may face changes to fire risk assessment scope where units are treated as non-dwellings, because the note says this can extend assessment beyond common parts into apartments.

Architects, building services engineers and M&E engineers may need to reflect on evacuation strategy choices where occupant familiarity is low, because the note contrasts stay put assumptions with short-term occupancy patterns.

Facility managers and building managers may need to test whether any managed evacuation approach can be sustained over time, because the note describes reliance on 24/7 staffing, training and long-term financial commitment in some strategies.

Developers and those engaging with building control may need clarity on regulatory pathways and HRB status, because the note describes different oversight routes for HRBs and non-HRBs and the legal consequences tied to registration and safety case duties.

IFE year in review highlights 2025 standards work and sector engagement

IFE blog reviews 2025 activity

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) has published a blog post dated Wednesday 10 December 2025 reviewing its work across 2025 and outlining priorities moving into 2026.

The blog, titled 2025 A year in review, was written by Steve Hamm, CEO of the Institution of Fire Engineers.

Hamm described the year as focused on the IFE’s strategic direction, technical work and member activity, alongside representation at events and engagement with sector partners.

Steve Hamm, CEO of the Institution of Fire Engineers, said: “As 2025 draws to a close, we can reflect on a remarkable year.

“We have worked tirelessly to support and shape the evolving fire safety landscape through key initiatives, strategic partnerships, and the continued dedication of our members and volunteers worldwide.”

Strategic vision and sector presence

Hamm said one of the defining moments of 2025 was the launch of the IFE’s strategic vision, Leading Fire Safety.

He said the strategy was developed through consultation with members and stakeholders.

The blog also referenced IFE activity at events including the FIRE Conference, the International President’s Technical Conference and the Graduate Lecture.

Hamm added that the IFE represented the profession at global trade shows including the IFSJ Leaders Conference in Dubai, Intersec in Saudi Arabia, the NFPA Conference & Expo in Las Vegas and the Fire Safety Event in the UK.

Standards, guidance and technical work

Hamm said the IFE had an active year linked to technical standards and guidance.

He referenced BS 8674, which he described as setting competence requirements for fire risk assessors.

The blog also referenced the forthcoming BS EN 81-76 standard for evacuation lifts.

Hamm said the IFE supported the publication of PAS 8700:2025, which he described as addressing modern construction methods.

He also referenced a draft update to PAS 9980, which he said introduces tools to help determine when a Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW) is required.

Hamm said the IFE strengthened engagement with Special Interest Groups through new Terms of Reference.

He also said the IFE is leading the response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations.

Early careers programme and online sessions

Hamm said the IFE continued work connected to early career support following the launch of the Early Careers Networking Group (ECNG) last year.

He said the organisation introduced Elevate, described as a series of 60-minute interactive online sessions led by experts from across the global fire sector.

Hamm said Elevate was backed by partners including the Association For Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) and London Fire Brigade.

He said the series has been extended into 2026.

Sector reform and inclusion work

Hamm referenced UK building safety reform activity during 2025, including an April statement that the UK Government reaffirmed its commitment to building safety reform.

He also referenced the Engineering Council’s introduction of the UK-SPEC HRB standard, which he described as strengthening professional competence for those working on higher-risk buildings, and said the IFE supports it.

The blog also described work on Equity, Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EEDI) in partnership with Equal Engineers.

Hamm said the IFE hosted member-led focus groups as part of that work.

2026 outlook in the blog

Hamm said the IFE remains dedicated to advancing the fire safety profession worldwide as it moves into 2026.

He linked that intention to the organisation’s strategy and what he described as an enthusiastic global community.

Readers can view the full blog on the Institution of Fire Engineers’s website.

CROSS-UK highlights collapse risks across a structure’s full life

A famous collapse that was not “technical”

CROSS-UK has published an editorial in Newsletter 79 dated Thursday 11 December 2025, reflecting on how structural failures shape engineering practice and public safety responsibilities.

The editorial was written by Glenn Bell, Director, CROSS-US.

Bell writes that many engineers experience an early-career realisation that mistakes can carry catastrophic consequences.

He links that awareness to his work investigating the Hyatt Regency Hotel walkways collapse in Kansas City, Missouri in 1981.

Hyatt Regency collapse framed as culture

Bell argues that the Hyatt failure is often presented as a single technical issue involving a change in the hanger rod arrangement.

He writes that this is an oversimplification, and that project conditions and culture were central to why the collapse happened.

Bell describes a fast-tracked delivery approach where construction began before design was complete.

He also writes that numerous design changes took place, two key structural engineering staff quit mid-design, the fabricator was overloaded and shop drawing review was rushed.

Missed checks and warning signs

Bell writes that two quality inspection firms were dismissed and not replaced.

He also describes warning signs during construction, including early signs of failure in a structural sunscreen wall and a portion of the atrium roof collapsing.

He writes that two independent rechecks of the atrium structure still failed to uncover the walkway problems.

Glenn Bell, Director, CROSS-US, said: “In short, the project was out of control, with many missed opportunities to catch and correct the conditions that ultimately caused the collapse.”

CROSS reporting and Surfside investigation

Bell describes CROSS as focused on confidential reporting of more frequent “lesser” failures and concerns, rather than catastrophic failures resulting in fatalities.

He writes that, by studying precursors, reporting can help prevent catastrophic failures.

Bell also writes that he is co-lead of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology’s investigation into the Champlain Towers South collapse in Surfside, Florida in June 2021, which he notes claimed 98 lives.

He writes that the investigation is tasked with determining likely technical causes, recommending improvements to building codes and standards and identifying research needed to enhance structural safety.

Recurring themes across failures

Bell writes that structures are vulnerable at every stage of their life, and that survival to date is no guarantee of future safety.

He states that, between 1978 and 1987, the US experienced nine catastrophic failures across building ages, from construction through to decades into service.

He writes that recurring themes include poor quality assurance and quality control, poorly defined responsibilities, lack of redundancy and unheeded warnings.

Readers can view the full article on CROSS-UK’s website.

Building safety duties overwhelm SMEs as BESA calls for clearer enforcement

BESA survey flags pressures from building safety regime

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has reported that many small construction firms feel overwhelmed by the Building Safety Act, based on new research presented at London Build Expo in London on 26 November 2025.

The association said its second annual survey of the sector showed that, although 88% of industry professionals are aware of the legislation, most small and micro-businesses view it as “overwhelming and daunting” and feel “left behind”.

BESA added that these businesses make up 99% of the construction sector and related professions, which it described as the “lifeblood” of the industry.

There was also evidence that many clients are still operating on a “business as usual” basis, with cost and speed often taking precedence over safety.

The survey findings were discussed during a panel session at the London Build Expo, which focused on enforcement, communication and training needs linked to the new regime.

Rachel Davidson, director of specialist knowledge at BESA, said: “This is critical because those companies are the lifeblood of the industry.

“There are also a lot of people who still think the legislation only applies to HRBs (higher risk buildings).”

Davidson said: “A lot of this comes back to leadership and culture.

“78% of companies tell us that this is important to them but fewer than half report having taken enough action.”

Calls for clearer enforcement and targeted building safety guidance

Davidson noted that building engineering contractors increasingly want consistent enforcement of the Building Safety Act.

She stated that many contractors believe some clients will continue to treat compliance as optional unless there are visible consequences for non-compliance.

BESA is expanding its guidance to show firms “what good looks like” within their particular part of the sector, Davidson explained.

The association is advising companies that they do not need to master every detail of the Act, but instead concentrate on the clauses that relate directly to their role and responsibilities.

Davidson said this approach is intended to help smaller firms identify where they have direct duties and where they need to coordinate with other dutyholders.

BESA has set up a Building Safety Hub to host this material, including a new guide aimed at Principal Contractors.

Communication challenges across a 2.6 million-strong workforce

Fellow panellist Hannah Carpenter, from the Building Safety Wiki, highlighted the scale of the communication task given that the sector employs around 2.6 million people.

She said that messages about the Building Regulations and building safety standards need to move beyond compliance alone and address behaviour and pride in work.

Hannah Carpenter, from the Building Safety Wiki, said: “We need to be innovative about how we communicate and appeal to personal values because that is going to be more effective than continually talking about regulation.

“But getting 2.6 million people to pull in the same direction is a huge challenge.

“We need to ask people why we are doing this [which is] to keep people safe and make sure the Grenfell tragedy cannot happen again.

“That means talking about ‘purpose’…people should want to make a difference.

“This can’t just be about ticking boxes.”

Carpenter argued that more use should be made of non-traditional communication channels, including partnerships with organisations such as HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

She said these bodies already have strong links to individuals and small construction businesses, which could help reach audiences that traditional industry channels do not.

The panel also heard that the industry’s average reading age is around 11, according to Hertfordshire Building Control Chief Executive Officer Gary Cass.

Cass said this creates additional barriers to spreading information about regulatory duties and good practice through text-heavy material.

Regulator progress and pressure on Building Control resources

Cass noted that there are signs of progress at the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) on planning approvals for higher risk buildings.

He said the new leadership team at the BSR has cut the average processing time at Gateway Two to 17 weeks, down from as high as 38 weeks earlier in 2025.

Cass added that the regulator has been “very honest” about its earlier backlogs and is now moving in what he described as a more positive direction.

However, he said the longer-term success of the new regime will depend on closer collaboration between industry and the regulator.

Gary Cass, Chief Executive Officer at Hertfordshire Building Control, said: “However, the industry needs more education about the Building Regulations.

“People need to be looking at compliance and focus on what is required in the regulations not guidance.

“Building Control Officers are regulators first and foremost but the industry used to rely on them to guide them through the process…and now it needs to be educated [about how the new process works].”

Cass said enforcement can be applied in a constructive way and does not always have to lead directly to legal action.

He also warned of a decline in the number of Building Control Officers (BCOs), which he said is creating a resource issue and reducing access to experienced inspectors.

How building safety pressures affect technical disciplines

The panel discussion concluded that more sector-specific training is needed so that different parts of the supply chain understand their duties under the Building Safety Act.

Speakers said that many of the firms that feel most overwhelmed are also those that deliver core technical services such as building engineering, installation and maintenance.

They added that these companies often sit at critical points in projects where design decisions, product choices and installation quality interact with regulatory requirements.

BESA said its Building Safety Hub is intended to give these businesses practical guidance, examples of good practice and role-based breakdowns of responsibilities.

Why building safety compliance burdens matter for practitioners

The survey findings and panel comments are directly relevant to building services engineers, fire engineering consultants and system installers who are working under the Building Safety Act.

These groups operate in a sector where small and micro-businesses account for 99% of organisations, and many report that the legislation feels “overwhelming and daunting”.

For building engineering contractors and Principal Contractors, the focus on clear enforcement, role-specific duties and practical examples of “what good looks like” may shape how they organise projects and allocate responsibilities.

Building Control Officers, and those who work with them, face pressure from reduced staff numbers and the need to move from an advisory role to one centred on regulation and education.

Facility managers and clients commissioning work will encounter an environment where cost and speed are more likely to be challenged by contractors who are conscious of compliance obligations and enforcement risks.

Managing the foam phase-out: Alpine Fire outlines fluorine-free transition plans

Mark Thewlis, Operations Director at Alpine Fire, outlines how facilities can adapt to new regulations banning C8 foam and manage compliance safely

What do facilities need to do to ensure their fire suppression systems are compliant and effective in the wake of changing regulations?  Fluorine-containing foam has been a vital part of the fire suppression industry for years.

But there’s a problem.

The foams are made using so-called ‘forever chemicals’; long-chain polyfluoroalkyl compounds (PFAS) that pose a significant risk to the environment due to their inability to break down in nature.

As concerns have grown, public pressure has mounted, and as of 4th July 2025, new regulations have come into effect banning the use of C8 Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF).

Facilities must now act to not only comply with new regulations but also ensure any existing foam stocks are safely removed and disposed of.

Will you be affected?

If you work in facilities such as chemical manufacturing plants, automotive facilities, oil refineries, military installations and many other kinds of industrial buildings; then there’s a good chance that your fire suppression system may use  some kind of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) enhancement.

These foams, when mixed with water, smother fires and prevent vapour ignition by cutting off the supply of oxygen.

That means they’re commonly used in facilities where flammable liquids or hazardous chemicals are located on-site.

But each facility is different, so the extent to which you will be impacted largely depends on the system that you currently have in place and the steps you have already taken to go fluorine-free.

How to safely remove PFAS from your fire suppression systems

Because the use of C8 fluorine-containing foam is now prohibited, facilities must prioritise compliance with new regulations.

Those that don’t could face notices and fines, not to mention the potential reputational damage that comes with Environment Agency warnings and penalties.

That means you need to plan for the appropriate isolation, removal and disposal of any existing C8 foam stocks from your fire suppression systems without delay.

But this may not be as simple as you may think.

Here are a few key steps that facilities should take to ensure they’re on the right side of new regulations:

1 – Assess your risk

Don’t assume your system is clean just because you’ve removed C8.

Instead you need to conduct a detailed analysis to ensure that all traces of prohibited substances have been removed.

Expert engineers can help you to assess your system on site, conduct sampling tests to measure the extent of foam migration and detect the presence of banned C8 compounds.

2 – Flush your system

After working with all stakeholders to plan for any disruption you should then conduct a thorough clean of your systems.

This should involve completely draining water and residual foam concentrate from your system as well as systematically cleaning all pipework and components with a separate flush.

It’s vital that this activity is conducted carefully, complying with UK environmental regulations to avoid harm to the environment.

Once completed you should also retest your systems.

3 – Ethical disposal

There are strict rules governing the disposal of C8 foams.

That means that you need to work with certified partners to ensure the safe removal, disposal and ethical incineration of any C8 foams from your system.

However in the current climate, the availability of disposal incinerators has become restricted due to the surge of facilities rushing to comply with regulations.

This means that you may face delays or significant cost fluctuations as you attempt to dispose of any existing foam stocks.

4 – Explore fluorine-free alternatives

With further restrictions to fluorine-containing foams expected, another shrewd move would be to begin exploring what fluorine-free alternatives are available.

Known as synthetic fluorine-free foams (SFFF), facilities will need to analyse how compatible their usage would be with their current fire suppression systems and plan for any adaptations that need to be made to accommodate them.

Many companies are also looking into future-proof water-only-based systems.

The time to act is now

Transitioning to a fluorine-free future is a complex task for many facilities.

Despite the ban on C8 foam coming into force, many UK businesses are still struggling to comply with changing regulations.

But this isn’t a choice, it’s a necessity.

Whether it’s the immediate ban on C8 foams or the inevitable restriction of C6, a fluorine-free future is coming.

Waiting to see how this will impact your fire suppression is not a viable strategy, instead now is the time to proactively assess your systems and explore alternative solutions.

For more information on how you can prepare for a fluorine-free future, visit www.alpinefire.co.uk

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.