Angus Fire permit draft explains proposed PFAS treatment measures

Angus Fire permit moves to draft decision stage

The Environment Agency has opened a consultation on its minded-to decision to grant a permit variation for Angus Fire’s site in High Bentham, North Yorkshire.

The Environment Agency said the application is for an effluent treatment plant to reduce PFAS contamination in collected rainwater and future rainwater falling onto key areas of the site.

The consultation runs from Thursday 5 March until the end of Wednesday 1 April 2026.

The agency said it had reviewed comments and evidence from the original consultation last summer and could not find a reason to refuse the application at this stage.

It said the draft decision document explains how comments from the earlier consultation were considered and sets out the decision-making behind the draft outcome.

The draft permit document sets out the conditions the operator would need to meet if the permit variation is granted.

The Environment Agency said people can respond through its Citizen Space consultation website or by email.

Angus Fire site plans and PFAS treatment

Previously, Angus Fire manufactured and tested firefighting foam at the site, and the foam is known to have contained per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

The Environment Agency said those PFAS chemicals contaminate rainwater when it falls onto key areas of the site.

That rainwater has been collected so it can be treated to reduce PFAS substances.

The application covers an effluent treatment plant intended to reduce PFAS in stored rainwater and in future rainwater from the site.

Once treated at the plant, the rainwater would be discharged to the River Wenning.

The proposed PFAS level remaining in the treated rainwater discharged into the river would be in line with levels currently accepted as best practice for PFAS treatment processes.

The operator no longer manufactures firefighting foam at its High Bentham site.

The application relates to treating rainwater affected by the site’s previous manufacturing processes.

Angus Fire consultation invites public responses

John Neville, Area Environment Manager for the Environment Agency, said: “We have carefully considered all of the documents, as well as the consultation comments, and currently can’t find any reason to refuse the variation application.

“Our regulatory controls are in place to protect people and the environment and we are carrying out a detailed and robust assessment.

“I’d encourage interested parties to view the decision document and send us their comments. We’ll then make our final decision once we’ve reviewed those responses.”

The Environment Agency said it may only refuse a permit application if it does not meet one or more legal requirements under environmental legislation.

It said that where an application shows a site can operate in line with current environmental regulations and provide a high level of protection for the environment and human health, it is legally required to issue a permit.

The consultation documents explain what the agency can take into account when deciding the application, and people who cannot respond online or by email can contact the Environment Agency by phone.

Engine bay defence: MusterFire International tackles hidden fire risks in compact machinery

Hazem Omran, Product Engineering Manager at MusterFire International, explains how compact misting systems protect small mobile machines from rapid engine compartment incidents

Fires in engine compartments of small mobile machines remain a persistent operational and safety risk across mining, agriculture, construction, transport, forestry, and waste handling sectors.

These machines operate in demanding environments characterised by vibration, dust, high ambient temperatures, and continuous mechanical load.

Within the confined space of an engine bay, hot exhaust components sit in close proximity to fuel lines, hydraulic systems, electrical harnesses, and accumulated debris.

When a fault occurs – whether from a ruptured hose, electrical short, or oil mist contacting a turbocharger – ignition can develop rapidly and escalate before an operator is even aware of the event.

As Product Engineering Manager at MusterFire International, my responsibility is to ensure our fire suppression systems are engineered to perform reliably under precisely these conditions.

Our focus is on automatic fire suppression for mobile and transportable equipment.

The objective is straightforward: detect a fire at its earliest stage and suppress it automatically before it becomes a major asset loss or safety incident.

Why smaller machines lack protection

Historically, compact mobile machinery has presented a protection gap.

Larger haul trucks and heavy mining assets are commonly fitted with engineered suppression systems.

Smaller equipment – such as compact loaders, skid steers, small excavators, and light transport vehicles – often operate with limited engineered protection due to space constraints, weight sensitivity, and perceived installation complexity.

Yet these smaller assets face the same ignition risks within tightly enclosed engine compartments.

The Muster Misting System was developed to address that gap.

It is a lightweight, self-contained suppression solution designed for engine compartments up to 2.25 cubic metres.

Rather than relying on high mass or bulky hardware, the system uses a fine mist discharge architecture that maximises extinguishing efficiency within a compact footprint.

A misting fire suppression system distributes extinguishing agent as atomised droplets through multiple strategically positioned nozzles.

The droplet size is intentionally small.

This significantly increases surface area, improving heat absorption when the droplets encounter flame or hot surfaces.

In a confined engine compartment, this fine mist expands rapidly, filling voids and surrounding components more uniformly than a coarse discharge pattern.

The agent used in the Muster Misting System is a 1 per cent fluorine-free foam solution.

The selection of fluorine-free chemistry reflects both environmental responsibility and forward-looking regulatory alignment.

There is increasing scrutiny globally on fluorinated compounds.

By adopting fluorine-free foam, we reduce environmental persistence while maintaining effective suppression performance.

From a technical perspective, the 1 per cent concentration is sufficient because the misting architecture enhances agent efficiency.

When the fine droplets contact flame or high-temperature surfaces, they absorb heat rapidly and convert to vapour.

This vapour expansion extracts thermal energy from the combustion zone, lowering temperatures below the threshold required to sustain ignition.

Simultaneously, the foam component forms a thin suppressive film over flammable liquid surfaces such as diesel or hydraulic oil.

Many engine compartment fires involve atomised fuel or oil contacting hot components.

By reducing vapour release and cooling the environment, the system interrupts the combustion cycle.

Activation is achieved through Loss-of-Pressure technology.

A pressurised detection tube is routed throughout the hazard area, typically along high-risk components such as turbochargers, exhaust manifolds, and hydraulic assemblies.

Under normal conditions, the tube maintains system pressure.

When exposed to abnormal heat levels indicative of a fire, the tube ruptures at the hottest point.

This rupture creates an immediate pressure drop that mechanically triggers the discharge valve on the agent cylinder.

This method offers several advantages in mobile environments.

It is direct-acting and localised, meaning the system responds precisely at the ignition source.

It does not depend on external power supply, electronic sensors, or software for primary activation.

In a fire event where electrical systems may be compromised, mechanical activation ensures reliability.

At the same time, the pressure circuit can be continuously monitored via an indicator panel and integrated with digital diagnostics to confirm system readiness.

Nozzle placement inside an engine bay is determined through structured hazard assessment.

We analyse engine layout, airflow, ignition sources, and fluid pathways.

High-risk zones typically include turbochargers, exhaust manifolds, alternators, starter motors, fuel injection systems, and hydraulic pump assemblies.

The objective is to create overlapping spray patterns that achieve uniform mist distribution and avoid untreated areas where flame could persist.

Depending on compartment size and geometry, compact machines generally require two to four nozzles.

For engine bays approaching the 2.25 cubic metre design limit, additional nozzles may be specified to maintain coverage density.

Engineering calculations consider enclosure volume, discharge characteristics, and target concentration levels.

Configurations are validated against performance testing to ensure consistency across installations.

Mechanical activation in harsh conditions

Installation has been engineered for both OEM integration and retrofit application.

On existing equipment, the process typically involves mounting the cylinder in a protected but accessible location, routing the detection tube around critical heat sources, and installing distribution tubing and nozzles inside the engine compartment.

The most common challenges relate to space constraints and routing discipline.

Compact machinery provides limited clearance, and tubing must be secured away from moving parts and sharp edges while maintaining correct bend radii.

Vibration management is also critical in mobile plant.

Secure bracket design and correct fastening procedures ensure long-term durability.

Because the misting system is comparatively lightweight and compact, it integrates more readily into smaller machines without significant structural modification.

Digital monitoring is provided through Muster360.

When integrated, Muster360 enables real-time visibility of system status, including pressure integrity, activation state, and fault conditions.

For fleet managers overseeing dispersed assets, this reduces reliance solely on manual inspection cycles.

Alerts can indicate pressure anomalies or discharge events, and historical logs provide traceable maintenance records.

Monitoring, records and compliance

In regulated industries such as mining, documented compliance and asset traceability are increasingly important.

Cloud diagnostics support audit readiness and provide assurance that suppression systems remain operational across the fleet.

Performance validation is fundamental.

The Muster Misting System is certified to AS 5062:2022, which defines requirements for fire protection systems on mobile and transportable equipment in Australia.

This standard addresses design, installation, and performance verification under realistic fire conditions.

In addition, the system has been tested to UL 1254, which specifies controlled performance testing for engine compartment hazards.

Certification and recognised testing provide independent verification that the system performs as intended under defined scenarios.

For end users, this reduces operational risk, supports insurance expectations, and demonstrates due diligence in asset protection strategy.

Looking ahead, compact misting suppression systems should be viewed as one layer within a comprehensive fire risk management framework.

Preventive maintenance, leak management, housekeeping, and operator awareness remain essential.

However, engine compartment fires can escalate in under a minute.

Automatic suppression addresses the time gap between ignition and human response.

As machinery becomes increasingly compact and thermally dense, lightweight and modular suppression technologies will become more relevant.

Compact systems expand engineered protection coverage to asset classes that were historically under-protected due to packaging constraints.

From an engineering perspective, the objective is controlled and measurable risk reduction: limiting downtime, reducing repair costs, protecting personnel, and aligning with evolving compliance frameworks.

Compact misting fire suppression represents a technically sound and scalable approach to improving safety outcomes across small mobile machinery fleets.

This was originally published in the March 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

United Safety announces Reacton partnership and recapitalisation

Reacton joins United Safety in new partnership

United Safety & Survivability Corporation (United Safety) has announced a recapitalisation and strategic partnership with Reacton Fire Suppression that adds Reacton to its mobile fire suppression portfolio.

In a 9 March statement, United Safety said the agreement brings Reacton into the combined company’s product family and expands its offering across sectors including mining, heavy machinery, defence, transportation, marine, energy and critical infrastructure.

Reacton has operations in the United Kingdom, United States and the United Arab Emirates.

The company said the partnership will combine Reacton’s fire suppression technology with United Safety’s manufacturing base and international infrastructure.

The combined organisation will offer water mist, liquid, dry powder, clean agent and dual-agent fire suppression systems.

United Safety said the agreement will also maintain the Reacton and Fireward brands, along with their existing engineering standards and customer approach.

Expansion plans and customer continuity

Joseph Mirabile, CEO of United Safety, said: “This partnership marks a defining moment in our mission to save lives and protect infrastructure around the world.

“By combining engineering excellence with global scale, we are building the strongest fire suppression platform in the industry.

“I am incredibly excited about the growth opportunities ahead across Europe, the Middle East, APAC, and the Americas as we expand our ability to protect people and high-value assets in mission critical environments.”

Sam Malins, CEO of Reacton Fire Suppression, added: “This partnership is the natural evolution of the journey we began years ago.

“We built Reacton on engineering integrity, simplicity, and trust – growing deliberately, protecting our standards, and earning our reputation in some of the world’s toughest environments.

“Joining forces with United Safety allows us to preserve that DNA while scaling globally.

“I’m incredibly proud of our people and excited for what we can achieve together.

“As a result of the enhanced investment, infrastructure, and global reach, the newly combined organization is uniquely positioned to lead the next era of mobile fire protection, delivering life-saving solutions where they matter most.”

The companies said customers and partners will continue to work with the existing Reacton and Fireward brands as the combined business expands its product development work and international support.

Simplifying pump room procurement: Idroelettrica and Millars Pumps’ approach to fire pump projects

Giovanni Vaccari, Sales Export Manager at Idroelettrica, sets out how collaboration with Millars Pumps combines Italian manufacturing expertise with local UK technical support across the project lifecycle

Sourcing reliable fire pump systems has become an increasingly challenging task for the UK fire industry, across both new build and retrofit projects.

Fire pumps are highly specialised components within a building’s fire protection system, which must perform seamlessly in critical situations.

As a result, they are subject to strict regulations, and must comply with a range of UK and international standards.

In addition, bespoke designs are often required to suit the specific needs of each building according to its use, size, layout and fire safety procedures.

This combination of technical complexity, regulatory compliance and customisation can make procurement time-consuming and complicated, with fire protection contractors and engineers facing long lead times while trying to source the right equipment for each project.

Millars Pumps, the new exclusive distributor of Idroelettrica fire pumps and pump room solutions in the UK, has been created to help alleviate these issues.

 By combining decades of Italian manufacturing expertise with local UK technical support, the aim is to simplify procurement, improve reliability and competitiveness and provide greater support throughout the entire process, from specification to installation to long-term maintenance.

Expert specification

One of the biggest challenges facing UK fire pump projects is getting the specification right at an early stage.

This is essential to avoid late design changes, delays, or even costly remedial work.

Specification starts with understanding and assessing the characteristics of the building, such as the type, use, occupancy levels, number of floors, the planned sprinkler or water mist system design, available space for the pump room, and access to a water supply.

These factors will determine the ‘fire demand’ or amount of flow and pressure the pump system must support, and whether additional equipment such as a water storage tank is required.

Building-specific calculations are made to determine the most suitable pump system, which must then be designed to comply with relevant standards.

At Idroelettrica, our strength lies in our engineering-led approach to fire pump design.

We have extensive experience in manufacturing fire pump systems for global markets, which means we can work closely with Millars Pumps to support UK contractors, consultants and developers during the crucial specification phase.

We ask the right questions and draw from our expertise to ensure pump sets, controllers and enclosures are correctly sized and configured for each application, reducing risk later in the project.

Compliant and future proof

Navigating the standards and regulations for UK fire pump systems is particularly complex.

 For example, depending on the application, fire pumps may need to comply with BS EN12845 which covers automatic sprinkler systems in buildings in the UK and Europe, BS 9251:2021 for fire sprinkler systems in UK residential buildings, NFPA-20 which is an international standard for the installation of stationary fire pumps, or FM 3-7 which covers requirements from the independent testing agency, FM Approvals, for fire pump sets.

 For many buildings, a combination of these will be needed.

Each of these standards brings its own requirements around testing, control systems and documentation which are not only highly technical but are also regularly updated, making compliance increasingly challenging.

 Updates are driven by changes in building use, insurer demands or lessons learned from fire incidents.

 So it’s important that design specifications are not only compliant at the time of design, but also robust enough to adapt to possible requirement changes in years to come.

This is where modular pump rooms solutions can provide a more forward-thinking and future-proof approach.

 While traditional fire pump rooms are constructed on site, with different parties responsible for building work, mechanical installation and electrical installation, modular pump rooms are pre-engineered in their entirety in the factory.

 Working to detailed specifications, the components can be assembled and tested prior to delivery to ensure the complete system conforms to industry standards, offering greater control and reassurance.

Our Idroelettrica factory in Modena in Italy, for example, features a state-of-the-art, in-house testing facility, where all our pump systems are assembled and tested under controlled conditions, providing documented assurance.

Pre-engineered for convenience and access

At Idroelettrica, our most popular modular system is the Firebox.

 It’s a pre-engineered ‘plug and play’ pump room that arrives on site fully fitted, tested and ready for installation.

Firebox combines pump sets, controllers, pipework and the enclosure into a single, integrated solution, manufactured in advance to suit each building’s space, fire protection plan and technical requirements.

For developers and contractors working to tight programmes, where schedule certainty matters, the convenience is a major advantage.

Firebox reduces installation time on site, cuts labour costs and reduces project risk compared to traditional onsite builds.

The innovative design of Firebox means that all sides are also doors that fully open, providing 360° access.

This provides clear working space around pumps, valves and controllers and supports regular inspection, testing and servicing.

Local customer support and maintenance

While manufacturing quality is fundamental, we understand that the long-term performance of a fire pump system depends on effective local support.

Fire pumps require regular inspection and maintenance to ensure they continue to be operational.

As our exclusive UK distributor, Millars Pumps provides a direct link between manufacturer and customer, helping to streamline procurement.

This simplified route to market improves communication, shortens lead times and provides greater certainty around delivery.

The team at Millars Pumps are also on hand to support customers throughout installation, commissioning and with ongoing servicing and maintenance.

In this way, our customers benefit from both the expertise of a global leader and the practical, long-term customer relationships available from a UK-based firm.

From factory to site

As fire safety expectations continue to rise, it’s clear that fire pump room procurement is no longer simply a matter of selecting equipment.

 It requires careful consideration of compliance, build quality, programme certainty and long-term serviceability.

 Traditional site-built approaches can struggle to keep pace with these demands, particularly on complex or time-sensitive projects.

Pre-engineered, modular pump rooms, like Firebox, can provide a more controlled and reliable alternative, offering bespoke design with factory-built quality and certified performance.

When combined with the local technical expertise and long-term support provided by Millars Pumps, this approach offers a more resilient model for improving consistency, reducing risk and future-proofing critical fire protection infrastructure.

 Solutions like this that can simplify procurement while enhancing reliability, compliance and long-term value are likely to play an increasingly important role across the UK fire industry in the years ahead.

For more information visit: www.millarspumps.co.uk

This was originally published in the March 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

Cleaner concentrate choices: Inside the global SFFF market expansion

IFSJ’s market report tracks the global SFFF market, sizing demand, forecasts, policy drivers, adoption by region and procurement issues for airports and industrial sites

Synthetic fluorine-free foams (SFFF) are moving from limited use to standard specification for Class B suppression in many sectors.

This shift is being driven by tighter PFAS regulations, the financial burden of managing legacy AFFF inventories and greater scrutiny of foam chemistry by buyers, regulators and insurers.

Airports, petrochemical facilities, marine terminals and municipal fire departments are updating procurement frameworks and operational procedures as they assess performance criteria alongside environmental and legal considerations.

This report examines the global SFFF market, focusing on current valuation, projected growth, adoption drivers and regional demand patterns.

Market overview

SFFF forms part of the broader PFAS-free firefighting foam segment, which remains smaller than the legacy fluorinated foam market but is expanding rapidly.

According to Fact.MR, PFAS-free firefighting foams are projected to grow from $310.0 million in 2026 to $937.3 million by 2036, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 11.7%.

Within this category, synthetic detergent-based fluorine-free foams account for about 44% of the segment, placing the estimated SFFF market value at approximately $136 million in 2026 and projected to reach about $412 million by 2036.

Future Market Insights reports similar expansion trends, forecasting PFAS-free foam growth from $346.3 million in 2026 to more than $1 billion by 2036.

The wider firefighting foam market remains substantially larger.

According to Custom Market Insights, the total global firefighting foam market was valued at approximately $5.82 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $7.57 billion by 2034.

The PFAS-free segment is expected to account for an increasing share of this total as replacement cycles accelerate.

Strengths

SFFF provides an alternative to fluorinated concentrates while maintaining operational capability for Class B suppression.

This transition can simplify chemical management and reduce the long-term liabilities associated with PFAS detection in soil, groundwater and infrastructure.

Manufacturers are developing SFFF formulations designed for compatibility with fixed suppression systems, mobile monitors and portable equipment, subject to validation testing.

This compatibility allows agencies and industrial operators to transition while maintaining existing infrastructure where feasible.

Technical improvements in polymer hydration and concentrate formulation have improved viscosity stability and proportioning reliability, which supports consistent performance during storage and discharge.

This reliability is particularly relevant in environments where foam systems may remain inactive for extended periods.

Alcohol-resistant SFFF variants are expanding operational coverage for facilities handling polar solvents such as ethanol, methanol and acetone.

This allows sites to standardize inventory across multiple hazard classes, reducing storage and logistics complexity.

Challenges

System compatibility verification remains one of the primary barriers to adoption.

Many operators must conduct proportioning tests, discharge verification and documentation to confirm performance with their specific equipment.

This process can require technical support, downtime and capital planning.

Application techniques for fluorine-free foams may differ from legacy fluorinated foams, particularly in low expansion applications.

This requires updated training procedures to ensure effective use in emergency conditions.

Product approval and certification availability can also limit supplier selection.

Buyers often require listings from recognized testing bodies or approval from authorities having jurisdiction, which can extend procurement timelines.

In addition to concentrate replacement, organizations face costs associated with the removal, disposal and remediation of legacy AFFF systems.

Cleanup of contaminated infrastructure, wastewater and soil can represent a large share of transition expenditures.

Recent developments

Regulatory changes are accelerating the transition toward fluorine-free foams.

According to the European Commission, new restrictions on PFAS in firefighting foams took effect in October 2025, with phased transition timelines depending on application.

In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration has approved fluorine-free foam use at Part 139 airports, aligning with Department of Defense specifications published in January 2023.

According to the American Association of Airport Executives, airports are actively transitioning to fluorine-free concentrates and expanding procurement programs.

Legislative funding has also supported adoption.

According to the International Association of Fire Fighters, US legislation has allocated $350 million to support airport foam replacement and cleanup, along with $30 million for vehicle modifications and related infrastructure updates.

Product development continues across multiple manufacturers.

For example, Fomtec introduced Enviro NEO in January 2026, an SFFF concentrate designed for petrochemical, oil and gas and marine applications, reflecting ongoing investment in fluorine-free formulations.

Regional insights

North America is one of the largest SFFF adoption regions, driven by airport compliance requirements, military transition programs and litigation exposure related to PFAS contamination.

Municipal fire departments and industrial operators are also incorporating fluorine-free foam into procurement planning.

Europe is progressing rapidly due to regulatory enforcement and environmental compliance frameworks.

Industrial operators, airports and municipal services are aligning procurement with regional PFAS restrictions and national phase-out schedules.

Asia Pacific presents strong growth potential due to expanding aviation infrastructure, industrial development and regulatory activity.

According to Airservices Australia, fluorine-free foams have already been deployed across Australian civilian airports, demonstrating early transition within the region.

The Middle East is seeing adoption primarily within petrochemical, marine and energy sectors, where large-scale fixed suppression systems require fluorine-free concentrates compatible with seawater and high hazard fuels.

Latin America and Africa remain emerging markets for SFFF adoption.

Uptake is concentrated in oil and gas, mining, ports and aviation sectors, where compliance with international insurance and operational standards is driving procurement decisions.

This was originally published in the March 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

From zero to Qmax: Jensen Hughes breaks down sprinkler tank sizing

Andrew Cowan, Senior Engineer at Jensen Hughes, explains what Qmax means in the context of BS EN 12845

In fire protection engineering, automatic sprinkler systems are fundamental to safeguarding both life and property. Their effectiveness stems from their ability to detect and control fires rapidly, containing fire growth until emergency responders arrive. To achieve this, two design factors are essential: water density and duration of discharge.

Water density is the volume of water applied to a given area, usually measured in millimetres per minute (mm/min) or litres per minute per square metre (l/min/m²) in the UK. It ensures sufficient water reaches the fire to absorb the heat, cool burning materials and prevent spread. If the density is too low, the water may evaporate before suppressing the fire, reducing the system’s effectiveness.

Equally important is the discharge duration – the length of time the system must maintain adequate flow. This ensures the fire remains under control until it is fully extinguished, either by the fire service or in a controlled burn-out. Insufficient duration risks re-ignition or uncontrolled spread after initial suppression.

Both density and duration are set out in BS EN 12845, the European standard for the design, installation and maintenance of fixed sprinkler systems. Within its hydraulic design requirements, one concept stands out: Qmax, the maximum water flow rate a system must deliver under the most favourable hydraulic conditions. Understanding Qmax is key to sizing an adequate stored water volume.

Methods of hydraulic calculation

To ensure reliable sprinkler performance, designers must conduct hydraulic calculations to confirm that the pipe network can deliver adequate flow and pressure to operating sprinklers. Under BS EN 12845, two calculation methods are permitted:

  1. Pre-calculated Method: This method is a solution where the pipework diameters are sized as per tables within BS EN 12845 up until a defined point on the sprinkler array. This is known as a design point. The pipe diameters from the design point back to the Installation Control Valve (ICV) are calculated to ensure the total pressure loss does not exceed 0.5 bar, except where static pressure, between the height of the highest sprinkler on the system and the design point in question can be accounted for. The pressure and flow requirements to be provided to the ICV are prescribed in the standard for the specific risk.
  2. Full Hydraulic Calculation Method: This method is required for high-hazard systems but also used where customised pipe sizing or water supplies are needed. The full calculation method requires designers to evaluate two operating scenarios:
  3. Most hydraulically unfavourable area: Usually farthest from the water supply, where maintaining pressure and flow is most difficult.
  4. Most hydraulically favourable area: Typically closest to the supply, where conditions are least demanding.

Factors considered

To establish pressure and flow requirements, the calculation must consider:

  • Pipe lengths/types and diameters
  • Elevation differences between sprinklers and the pump or tank
  • Friction losses in pipes, fittings and valves
  • Hazard classification density requirements
  • Application area
  • Minimum sprinkler operating pressure

Assumed Maximum Area of Operation (AMAO)

A critical element of hydraulic design is determining the Assumed Maximum Area of Operation (AMAO), which specifies the maximum number of sprinklers likely to operate during a fire. This value depends on the hazard classification and whether the system is wet or dry.

For instance, an Ordinary Hazard Group 3 wet system requires an operating area of 216 m², while the same occupancy with a dry valve necessitates a larger AMAO of 270 m². Designers should consult BS EN 12845 to confirm the correct AMAO for each scenario.

By defining the AMAO, designers ensure the system can handle the worst-case conditions for the specified hazard class. This area is used to model realistic fire scenarios and to correctly size pumps, pipework and water storage.

Tailored design based on actual fire compartment areas

Every fire protection project is unique and should be assessed according to its specific risk profile. While the AMAO provides a standard design reference, actual fire compartment sizes can be used if they are smaller and meet the required fire resistance for the hazard class.

This approach allows for a customised design, optimising sprinkler water demand, pump requirements and tank capacity. By basing calculations on the actual protected area rather than a generic maximum, designers can improve system efficiency without compromising compliance, provided the correct compartment fire resistance is maintained.

Fire pump curve and system demand

After identifying the most favourable and unfavourable demand points, the designer selects an appropriate fire pump that can satisfy both scenarios. This selection process involves analysing the pump curve, which graphically represents the relationship between pressure and flow for a specific pump.

An example of the pump curve and system demand points is illustrated below

The graph illustrates four key lines.

Black Line – 1: The system demand is derived from the pressure-flow relationship of the most favourable area of operation. It is drawn using a hydraulic quadratic formula. This equation helps draw a curve that simulates how the system responds when only the closest sprinklers operate. Since these require less pressure to achieve the required flow, this becomes a conservative estimate for maximum system capacity.

Orange Line – 2: The true pump performance curve. This line shows how the pump’s pressure output decreases as flow increases. Under BS EN 12845, the pump must provide at least 0.5 bar more pressure than what is needed at the most unfavourable point to accommodate design changes during installation.

Green Line – 3: This represents the pump curve plus static pressure. The static pressure comes from the height of water in the storage tank, which contributes additional force through gravity. It essentially reflects the total available pressure at the pump outlet, combining pump energy and gravitational pressure.

Blue Line – 4: This is the Qmax line.

Qmax

Once the system demand curve (Black Line – 1) intersects with the pump plus static pressure curve (Green Line – 3), the intersection point projects vertically to the x-axis. This vertical projection is known as Qmax – the maximum theoretical flow the system could deliver under the most favourable conditions.

In practical terms, Qmax represents the maximum flow demand the fire protection system must be able to supply. It reflects the worst-case scenario of flow in a sprinkler activation and forms the basis for water storage sizing.

Sizing the sprinkler tank

After Qmax is determined, the next step is to size the water storage tank. The volume of water required depends on both Qmax and the required duration of sprinkler operation, which again depends on the hazard class.

The designer would then coordinate with a sprinkler tank manufacturer to select a tank with an effective capacity that meets or exceeds this volume.

Conclusion

Understanding and calculating Qmax is a critical step in the hydraulic design of sprinkler systems governed by codes like BS EN 12845. By accurately determining Qmax, designers ensure that the system is capable of meeting the most demanding suppression scenarios.

Whether you’re a fire protection engineer, designer or building services consultant, understanding the principles behind Qmax gives you an understanding of how a sprinkler tank is sized.

At Jensen Hughes, our fire protection engineers apply these principles to various projects, supporting compliant and efficient sprinkler system designs tailored to each facility’s specific risk profile and operational requirements

This was originally published in the March 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

Report questions claims about water mist outperformance in England fire incident data

Water mist systems in IRS data are not like-for-like

A report by Optimal Economics has concluded that Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) incident data cannot be used to determine the comparative effectiveness of sprinklers and water mist systems in England.

Commissioned by the British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA), the analysis drew on the MHCLG Incident Recording System (IRS) dataset of primary fires where a sprinkler or water-based fire suppression system was present between 2018/19 and 2023/24.

It reviewed 2,924 incidents in total.

Sprinkler systems accounted for 2,438 incidents, or 83% of the dataset.

Water mist systems accounted for 486 incidents.

Sprinkler systems are described as fixed, building-wide installations, whereas water mist covers a range of technologies including fixed automatic systems and portable or manually deployed hose-reel and lance equipment.

The dataset does not distinguish between those different water mist system types.

Where fires occurred and how systems were recorded

The analysis identified marked differences in the characteristics of incidents recorded under each system category.

Most sprinkler and water mist incidents occurred in non-residential buildings.

Industrial premises accounted for almost half of non-residential sprinkler incidents, including factories, recycling centres and warehouses.

There were 69 water mist incidents in industrial premises, mainly in food and drinks processing, recycling and factories.

In non-residential settings, 74% of water mist incidents were recorded in custodial environments, including prisons and young offenders’ institutions.

In dwellings, sprinkler incidents were concentrated in purpose-built flats or maisonettes, particularly those with more than ten storeys.

Water mist incidents in dwellings were primarily recorded in low-rise settings, with a concentration in single-occupancy bungalows or self-contained sheltered housing.

The report links these cases to the use of personal protection systems for vulnerable residents under local policies.

Differences were also recorded in the location of systems relative to the fire.

In most sprinkler incidents, the system was located in the room of origin.

In water mist incidents, the system was more often recorded as being on the same floor as the fire.

In 71% of water mist incidents where the system operated, the fire was on the same floor as the system rather than in the room of origin.

Conclusions and recommendations for future data

The report concludes that the IRS dataset does not contain two comparable populations of building-wide automatic suppression systems.

As a result, a robust comparative analysis of operational reliability and performance reliability between sprinklers and water mist is not possible.

It states: “Any claims that MHCLG incident data demonstrate superior effectiveness of water mist systems compared to sprinklers are not supported by the evidence and arise from invalid comparisons between fundamentally different types of fire suppression systems.”

The analysis calls for system-level classification, consistent standards and sufficient sample sizes to enable valid comparisons.

It recommends that future IRS data collection distinguishes fixed building-wide suppression, personal protection systems, local application protection and manually deployed custodial systems.

Without that separation, it warns that “suppression policy risks being shaped by invalid evidence”.

Aspen partnership brings AI-powered wildfire suppression aircraft to WUI operations

Coordinated autonomous system ordered for Colorado wildfire response

Aspen Fire Protection District is set to receive a coordinated autonomous wildfire suppression system from Seneca in summer 2026.

Seneca announced the five-year, multi-million dollar partnership in a PRNewswire release.

The Seneca Strike Team will comprise five autonomous suppression aircraft, a mobile operations base and five years of software, connectivity and maintenance.

Each strike team has a capacity of approximately 500 gallons of finished foam per sortie.

A single pilot can operate multiple aircraft due to the system’s artificial intelligence and autonomy capabilities.

The system is intended to support operations in the wildland – urban interface (WUI).

Funding, intended uses and training timeline

According to the PRNewswire release, the aircraft system acquisition was supported through public private partnerships involving Aspen Fire Protection District (AFPD), the Aspen Fire Foundation and local donors.

Over the coming years, Seneca and AFPD aim to deploy additional autonomous aerial response bases.

Those bases are designed to respond within seconds of detection to reach new starts earlier.

The system is intended to help with starts in inaccessible areas, support night operations, maintain the safety of pile and prescribed burns and carry equipment on incidents in complex terrain.

Stuart Landesberg, Founder and CEO of Seneca, said: “Aspen has a unique blend of high-risk terrain, exceptional collaboration across their valley, and a highly skilled and forward-thinking team.

“They understand the importance of modernizing wildfire response to safeguard communities across the American West.”

Chief Jake Andersen, Fire Chief and CEO of Aspen Fire, said: “We are partnering with Seneca because this technology will help us save homes and save lives.

“Wildfires in our region are moving faster and growing more complex every year.

“Stu and the full Seneca team have listened to firefighters and built a system designed for the realities we face on the ground.

“This gives us another critical tool to protect our community before small starts become major incidents.

“We are grateful to the donors who partnered with Aspen Fire to make this possible, and we are proud to bring this capability to Aspen this summer.”

Aspen Fire expects training to begin in the early summer, with firefighters integrating Seneca into their core operations as fire season intensifies.

Southern Spain research identifies drivers of suppression performance

Southern Spain study reports what suppression achieved in Andalusia

An assessment of wildfire management in Andalusia found that suppression operations protected an estimated 67% of the potentially burnable area across 39 wildfires recorded between 2011 and 2019.

The findings were published in 2026 by Ortega M, López Sancho A and Molina JR in the International Journal of Wildland Fire.

The study estimated that for every unit of cost invested in suppression, about three units of potential economic losses were averted.

The authors concluded that operational performance and economic return varied according to province, fire behaviour and timing within the season.

Provincial, seasonal and fire behaviour patterns shaped results in Spain

The analysis identified consistent differences between provinces in southern Spain, with Córdoba and Sevilla recording higher effectiveness and higher cost-benefit values than Huelva and Cádiz.

Fire growth rate was linked to lower effectiveness, with faster-growing fires more difficult to contain.

Longer control times were associated with improved cost-benefit and cost effectiveness values.

The study reported lower containment effectiveness for fires occurring in June compared with July and August.

Later-season fires were associated with higher cost effectiveness.

Wildfires igniting during daytime were less effectively contained than those starting at night.

Higher rates of spread and longer flame lengths were linked in the modelling to increased technical efficiency values, alongside longer control times.

Modified index proposed to reflect area saved rather than area burned

The paper reported that the traditional Management Index relates suppression costs to total area burned, which can produce low values when fires are kept small.

To address this, the authors proposed a modified Management Index that links suppression costs to the area saved from burning.

The mean technical efficiency value reported in the study was 0.61, and the mean modified index value was 0.33.

The authors stated that combining measures of operational effectiveness and economic efficiency provides a multidimensional framework for assessing wildfire suppression performance in Spain.

Desu Systems to exhibit flame, gas and kitchen fire safety at Fire Safety Event 2026

Desu Systems at The fire safety event 2026

Desu Systems will exhibit flame and gas detection equipment and kitchen fire safety solutions at The Fire Safety Event 2026, from 28 to 30 April at the NEC Birmingham in the UK.

The company will exhibit at stand H40 with teams present from across its divisions.

Its presence will centre on practical discussions, personal demonstrations and pre-scheduled meetings for visitors.

Portfolio and technology partners

Desu Systems will place emphasis on its Flame and Gas Detection division and its Kitchen Fire and Hygiene Solutions portfolio.

The stand will host ongoing presentations and hands-on demonstrations, supported by meeting spaces for direct interaction with technical specialists and commercial teams.

As a European master distributor, the company represents Spectrex Flame and Gas Detection Equipment and Buckeye Kitchen Safety Solutions.

It works with partners including Spectrex, Rosemount, Hansentek, Buckeye and Sensia.

Ronald Verkroost, the CEO of Desu Systems, said: “Events like The Fire Safety Event are valuable because they create space for meaningful conversations.

“Our role goes beyond supplying technology.

“We work closely with partners and customers to ensure solutions are applied correctly, perform reliably, and meet the demands of real operating environments.”

Emile Hippe, the Managing Director, said: “The UK market places strong emphasis on compliance, reliability, and long-term performance.

“By exhibiting with our full team at stand H40, we can offer visitors direct access to the people who support projects from early specification through to implementation and ongoing operation.”

Meetings and company background

Journalists and industry professionals can book pre-arranged meetings or private briefings with the Desu Systems team to discuss market developments and current fire safety requirements.

The Fire Safety Event 2026 follows the company’s 20-year anniversary in 2025.

Desu Systems operates in over 60 countries.