Thermal Imaging: Unlock the next level of your superpower with Bullard

Seeing through thick smoke with the bare eye is unfortunately not a known human superpower.

However, the use of a thermal imager enhances your vision and therefore might even limit the time of being exposed to toxic environments.

Read this article from Bullard and find out why fire trainers are choosing thermal imagers and why it is so important to bring your personal one along.

For those not wanting to miss any news on Bullard thermal imagers, subscribe to the official Bullard Fire Training Camp newsletter.

Are you interested in purchasing a thermal imager? Request a non-binding demonstration today to find the right thermal imager for your needs.

IFSJ Exclusive: Closing the legislative gap with Evac+Chair

Evac + Chair looks at how the safety and lives of the UK’s disabled workforce are at risk in an emergency

Risky Business, the study from Evac+Chair International, found that one quarter of UK business decision makers do not know how many disabled and mobility impaired people there are within their organisation. Almost a third (29 per cent) have only “some” or “very little” understanding of their responsibilities, with one in 10 either not prepared, or unsure if they are adequately prepared, to safely evacuate employees needing assistance.

82 per cent of organisations surveyed are now calling on the Government to provide more clarity on their responsibilities surrounding fire safety, while more than two thirds (67 per cent) think that evacuation equipment should be a legal requirement.

Gerard Wallace, Managing Director of Evac+Chair International, says there are more than 4.8m disabled people in UK workplaces and this figure is rising and that those responsible for their safety are falling short, with a clear lack of knowledge, understanding and investment amplifying risk in emergency situations.

“Our findings show that safe evacuations for all clearly needs to move higher up the agenda.”

“Despite recent tragedies highlighting how important it is to be prepared to safely evacuate everyone from multistorey buildings, our findings show that safe evacuations for all clearly needs to move higher up the agenda,” says Wallace. “Our report makes the case to the Government for better education and a firmer legal landscape.”

This research surveyed 490 small and medium business decision makers across the UK about emergency evacuations. It covered legislation, awareness, preparedness and challenges facing firms when navigating their responsibilities around the safety of the disabled community.

Key findings

  • 25 per cent of decision makers are not aware of the number of mobility impaired people at their organisation.
  • More than two-thirds of decision makers (67 per cent) think there is a culture of fire safety non-compliance or looking for loopholes in the business community.
  • 29 per cent of organisations have only “some” or “very little” understanding of their obligations when it comes to safe evacuations.
  • 10 per cent of businesses are either not prepared, or unsure if they are fully prepared, to evacuate mobility impaired members of staff.
  • Almost one in five (19 per cent) say their organisations’ fire safety plan does not take into consideration temporary mobility issues.
  • Two-thirds (68 per cent) think that fire safety legislation does not do enough to protect people with mobility issues.
  • More than two thirds (67 per cent) think that having an evacuation chair should be a legal requirement.

New risks

Fires may be the most obvious and prevalent need for an emergency evacuation, but other risks are becoming increasingly possible, with flooding and extreme weather are expected to become the norm as Met Office research indicating that there is a greater risk of flash flooding and fire in the future. Energy shortages are also increasing the likelihood of blackouts, which are a trigger for emergency evacuations.

The research highlights a clear link between a lack of awareness and a lack of preparedness, with only one in five decision makers showing understanding of their organisation’s obligations when it comes to evacuation, whilst one in ten businesses are either not prepared at all or not sure they are prepared to evacuate disabled or mobility impaired members of staff.

Who is responsible?

An employers’ legal responsibilities under The Fire Safety Act in 2021, as explained by the London Fire Brigade, are to: “Ensure your premises reach the required standards” and “Provide employees with fire safety training – this usually includes induction training, covering general fire awareness, extra training if the level of risk increases as a result of changes to business operations and supporting employees to meet their fire safety duties. This could include training to carry out a fire risk assessment or for fire warden duties.”

Whoever is the appointed responsible person is required by law to carry out a Fire Risk Assessment to identify the risks and hazards in the premises they are responsible for. If a business has five or more employees, this Fire Risk Assessment must be recorded.

Grenfell’s legacy

Last year, disabled campaigners launched a legal challenge against the Government for failing to implement the Grenfell Tower inquiry’s call for evacuation plans for disabled people in high-rise buildings. The decision is expected imminently.

According to the report, more than one quarter (27 per cent) of respondents do not have someone solely responsible for evacuations, while one in five (19 per cent) do not take temporary mobility challenges – such as pregnancy or a broken leg – into consideration in their safety plans.

On regulation, 68 per cent think that fire safety legislation does not do enough to protect those with access needs, while the cost of equipment and a lack of information were cited as the biggest challenges for business leaders to develop suitable emergency evacuation procedures.

Sarah Rennie, accessibility consultant and fire safety campaigner of Claddag, which represents disabled and older people impacted by the #BuildingSafetyCrisis following the Grenfell Tower disaster says that the disabled community, which makes up one in five of the working age population, is placed in danger every day because of building design and management practices.

“The vast majority of us become disabled during our lives so it’s important to expect colleagues to need support next week which they might not need today,” says Rennie. “Any day of the week you should expect a disabled visitor, supplier or client to enter the building. Businesses must have practices in place to plan for known-unknown scenarios like this.

“The disabled residents who died in Grenfell Tower had no effective plans to escape or aids to do so. If we do not change our practices then we have to take personal and organisational accountability for future preventable deaths and life-changing injuries. In workplaces, we need to ask ourselves what our practices say about how we value the lives of our disabled colleagues, visitors and friends.”

Call for action

The report highlights the statistic that over two thirds (68 per cent) of respondents think that current fire safety legislation does not go far enough, whilst the majority (67 per cent) of respondents believe that having an evacuation chair should be a legal requirement.

The majority of respondents believe that having an evacuation chair should be a legal requirement.

Wallace adds: “Current legislation is not fit for purpose, offering little clarity to businesses and those responsible for multistorey buildings. This ambiguity, and the fact that provision of appropriate equipment is not a legal requirement, is clearly enabling a ‘slippery shoulders’ culture within businesses.

“Businesses are calling for more guidance and urging policymakers to make the law work harder for those facing access barriers. It’s time to close the legislative gap.”

Contact Evac+Chair on +44 (0) 121 706 6744 or enquiries@evacchair.co.uk and visit evacchair.co.uk for more information.

Evac+Chair at The Health and Safety Event

Evac+Chair will be showcasing their full range of evacuation chairs at the Health & Safety Event. Their team of experts will be available to discuss your evacuation requirements, provide information about training, maintenance and how to ensure you are prepared for safe evacuations. Live demonstrations will be taking place daily, giving delegates the opportunity to experience the world-renowned Evac+Chair themselves!

Evac+Chair is the original manufacturer and global leader in emergency evacuation chairs for the mobility impaired. Underpinned with over 40 years of experience in the design and manufacture of evacuation chairs, Evac+Chair is trusted and relied upon in emergency situations to assist in saving lives. With a wide range of accreditations, Evac+Chair prides itself on its superior product quality.

Their lifesaving products are installed in a variety of environments including offices, hotels, schools, colleges, sports stadia, retail outlets, factories and various healthcare settings worldwide.

To meet the team and find out more information on their products and services, please visit stand A20.

The Fire Safety Event: Bigger than ever before

IFSJ caught up with Tristan Norman, Show Director for The Fire Safety Event, to find out about what’s in store for attendees

Why should people attend The Fire Safety Event?

Since the fire safety event launched in 2016 in the NEC in Birmingham it has really gathered momentum over years, and even with the pandemic it has always grown year-on-year. This year it has grown more than any other year in its history – the show will be double the size of what it was in 2022.

We have some phenomenal exhibitors, a brilliant array of speakers, more networking opportunities and meeting opportunities than ever before, plus more opportunities for CPD. Overall, the event as a proposition truly is the UK’s number one meeting of the fire industry. We have more exhibitors and visitors there than any other platform in the UK

What is on the agenda for the fire industry at The Fire Safety this year?

One is the fallout from the Hackitt report. We’re five years on now and I think that some of the impacts are still being felt and worked through. Another is Brexit and what that has meant for product certification. In terms of new trends and innovation, we have a great section on cyber security and what that means withing the fire safety industry, how it impacts the likes of wireless detection.

Other things on our agenda are industry wide issues such as unconscious bias and levelling the playing field for anyone from any background, sex, nationality or belief to feel included in the fire industry, and to choose it as a viable career path. We’ve got some great sessions around diversity in the fire sector.

Nineteen as a business 60 per cent women. Diversity and inclusion is big on our own agenda as a business and we’re trying to help emanate that through our shows, and in light of recent reports that have come out from the London Fire Brigade, it has never been a bigger topic for the fire industry. It is one in particular that we would like to shine a positive light on and make sure that we’re doing everything we can as a vehicle and a platform for the industry to grow together and be more inclusive, and to make sure that we are utilising the incredible skillset of everyone that would like to be in the fire and safety industry.

All in all, we’re trying to create a platform for the fire industry to put them on the front foot and help people within the industry to lead the charge, whether that’s with technology and innovation or safety standards or diversity and inclusion. We are trying to be as forward thinking as we possibly can and ensure we are embracing all of the new impacts of trends and innovation as much as possible.

What key speakers and sessions should attendees from the fire industry look out for?

The session on day one that I’m really looking forward to is from Alison Phillips, the head of fire safety and risk management at Ocado. She’s coming in to talk about the lessons learned from the big Ocado warehouse fire in Andover – I think that’s going to be a fantastic session. On that same day, there’s going to be a session on unconscious bias within the industry. There will be representatives from manufacturers and industry professionals all talking around diversity and inclusion within the sector and how we can address that unconscious bias and grow as an industry.

Day two kicks off with an address from the Home Office, that is going to be a key session as it will address a lot of the issues that are still coming out of Grenfell and where we are five years down the line. We’ve then got a session in the afternoon of cyber threat to fire safety – as the world moves more digital, even in the fire and safety industry, the thread that seems to go through most industries is cyber security and cyber vulnerability and so its about making sure that our systems, particularly life safety systems are as robust as possible to ensure that there is no failure there.

Fire safety has some of the strictest certification in the world for a reason: if it fails the consequences are dire. If that is due to a hack or cyber threat then that’s something that we all need to be aware of. There are companies doing great things in that area for the fire sector.

The final day we’ve got Bob Docherty, the president if the Institute of Fire Safety Managers, talking around the Hackitt report five years on: what’s changed, what hasn’t, where there’s room for improvement.

We’ve got other interesting sessions around fire safety in residential buildings and on safe evacuation plans and the role of emergency lighting when it comes to tall buildings as well as larger commercial buildings and campuses. The conference wraps up with a session on protecting public premises so talking around what protecting public places and premises means in this day and age.

Can you tell me about the range of exhibitors from the fire industry at the show this year?

We’re delighted with the support we’ve received from the fire safety industry, from the manufacturers and service providers we’ve really been blown away by the support. We have a full sweep of the Halma Group companies which is the first time we have managed to get all of them together in one exhibiting space in many years, so that’s a big development for us.

We’ve got the likes of SSAIB, IOSH, and our supporting event partners such as IFSJ. It would be remiss for me not to talk around the work the ASFP do at our event – they put a lot into making the Fire Safety Event a success. This year they’ll be coming with their portable classroom for people to learn about passive fire and that will have a VR learning experience.

We are indebted to the Fire Protection Association (FPA) for the work they do both speaking at our event and post event, and BAFE who are key partners with us, and IFE doing IFSM. We’re really proud to work with all of our event partners and we thank them for getting involved in our event.

What networking opportunities will be available at this year’s event?

There will be networking opportunities for individual groups, a lot of the groups that come into the event like NAHFO, they’ll have a meeting at the show; Women in Fire will be having a meet up.

There’s a general rule which has become a tradition around the event which is that from 4pm onwards the event doesn’t necessarily ‘down tools’ but we start hosting our happy hours on all the networking lounges – live Music, free drinks – that will really put networking into full swing. Then there are a whole host of evening events that will happen across the city of Birmingham and the NEC campus for the whole industry – there’s too many to list, but it’s one not to be missed.

What are you most excited for as the event draws closer?

As event organisers, that transition from staring at a 2D floor plan and then seeing that built into a show always brings that sense of excitement. Seeing it built and the time and effort that our exhibitors make into those stands presences and seeing that come to life is amazing.

The thing I’m most looking forward to is that buzz. We’ve got more visitors and exhibitors registered than we ever have before, the whole event itself is nearly double in size and we’re just so excited to get to April and put on a fantastic event. Seeing it all come together is what I’m most excited about.

About the Fire Safety Event

The Fire Safety Event returns to the NEC Birmingham this month, playing host to leading manufacturers and suppliers to showcase their latest approved products and solutions. The show is dedicated to supporting industry practitioners, professionals and organisations in achieving and maintaining the very highest standards of fire safety management. Here’s what to expect from the event which kicks off on 25 April.

Over 150 exhibitors are participating at the 2023 show including many of the industry’s leading brands including such as: Advanced, Aico, Apollo, Checkmate Fire, Draeger, Eaton, Plus+ Group, Sentry Doors, and TOA. These brands and more will all be showcasing their latest research and development, product and solution launches and live demonstrations.

A number of key association and industry bodies are also supporting the Fire Safety Event and will be on hand to offer guidance and expert advice to visitors. Boasting three industry-led theatres and offering 45+ hours of free-to-attend CPD content, Education is at the heart of The Fire Safety Event. The show is the perfect opportunity for visitors to gain direct insight into improving, maintaining, and championing fire safety for all businesses.

The Fire Safety Theatre will also feature a line-up of leading industry experts and keynote speakers who will share their insight and expertise on best practice, regulatory updates and topical areas impacting the fire safety sector. Conference goers will be able to gain the practical knowledge and strategies to navigate new policy changes and stay fully compliant with fire safety standards.

New for 2023 is The Innovation & Regulation Theatre, which will showcase presentations on the important industry updates and guidance for practitioners and business owners. With a focus on standards, regulations and industry best practice, these sessions will educate businesses on how remain compliant and remain equipped to meet the needs of their clients.

The Fire Safety Event will also be introducing the specialised matchmaking service CONNECT+ Live to meet the business needs of fire safety professionals. 

Meet the IFSJ team at The Fire Safety Event!

International Fire & Safety Journal will be present at the show on Stand 3a/F57. Feel free to stop by the stand and catch up with IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey who will be on hand to talk attendees. To arrange a meeting with Iain at the show contact iain.hoey@intfireandsafetyjournal.com.

Iain Hoey says: “The Fire Safety is one of the most important events in a fire safety professionals calendar. I’m looking forward making new connections with show attendees and having the opportunity to catch up with old friends – I look forward to seeing you all there!”

IFSJ Exclusive: What can we learn from the Notre-Dame fire?

Steve Emery, Chair of the IFE Special Interest Group for Heritage Buildings, looks at what we have learned about fire since the 2019 Notre-Dame disaster

Global professional body, The Institution of Fire Engineers, has 10 Special Interest Groups (SIGs) that examine intricate subject areas of fire engineering. The Heritage Buildings SIG was set up by IFE member, Steve Emery, in 2008 whilst he was Fire Officer for English Heritage, and subsequently Historic England. Emery has also been employed as Oxford University’s Fire Officer, as well as boasting a 30-year career at Avon Fire Brigade, the last 12 years of which he served as Fire Officer for Bath – a World Heritage Site for its many listed buildings.

As a fire engineer with a specialty in heritage buildings, it was natural that Emery became interested in the catastrophic Notre-Dame fire which decimated one of Paris’ most historic landmarks. Iain Hoey, IFSJ Editor, caught up with Emery for the fourth anniversary of the Notre-Dame fire to find out what caused its collapse and how cathedrals and other heritage sites can avoid a similar fate.

When did you become interested in Notre-Dame?

I was a matter of interest for me because the vaults collapsed, and I wanted to know why. Traditionally, there will be a collapse if you have a point load on one side of the vault: it weakens that side and the other side collapses on it in on it. Alternative, the conoid – where the vault joins the walls – fills up with water and you have an imbalance. Before the fire, everything was in equilibrium: the walls were standing, the vaults were intact. Something happened to put it out of equilibrium. I wondered if the heat of the fire could have affected the limestone in such a way that it was weakened.

Can you explain the structure of Notre-Dame and similar heritage sites?

As part of Oxford University, we employed an intern for two weeks: Claire Ballantine – a postgraduate students from the School of Geography who investigated what stones the English cathedrals were built of, where the stones came from, and whether the quarries were still open.

Ballatine carried out a scoping study, testing four types of limestone in a furnace, including chalk – chalk limestone is much lighter than other limestone, and so it has been used for vaulting in heritage buildings. The problem with chalk is that it becomes soggy when it gets wet. We already knew that when the limestone is heated, it gives off ferric oxide which makes it more porous. When limestone gains porosity it loses its strength.

I started to look into how the vaults were staying up. Essentially, vaults are pushing against the walls, and the walls are stopping the vault from spreading by either having flying buttresses or being buttresses themselves. The Notre-Dame vaulting system is sexpartite. From the crown of the arch down to where it joins the wall is five metres, which is a tremendous depth.

How does a collapse occur?

If you’ve got flying buttresses and the vault collapses, then the flying buttress is trying to push the walls in. If, because of the collapse, the timbers have fallen to the floor, the radiated heat from that pile of roof timbers that is now the floor is then radiating heat onto the pillars on each side, which are holding the roof up.

The flying buttresses at the top are pushing the wall in. Meanwhile you’ve weakened the wall at ground floor level. There is then a real danger not just of having a vault collapse, but the whole wall collapsing. The more vaults that collapse, the worse the situation is.

If you’ve got a solid buttress that is on a firm foundation, when you take the vaulting away it is self-supporting and stays upright. It is only a problem when you’ve got flying buttresses.

In the early days after the fire at Notre-Dame, there was a real danger of the walls collapsing. After a while they managed to put some wooden supports underneath the flying buttresses to keep them up so they don’t push the walls.

How are the columns which support buildings affected during a fire?

The outside of the column, whether it’s decorative or smooth, is ashlar. It is a finished stone which is around four inches thick. The inside of the column is filled with rough limestone i.e. chunks of limestone, with a lime mortar. Over the years, with vibration from e.g. lorries and trains, the lime mortar becomes loose, then it starts to fall down. You end up with cracks inside the pillar and eventually all you’ve got is the outer skin of the pillar holding the weight of the roof up. When heat is impacting the columns and weakening it by making it more porous, the four inches outer skin is being eroded.

What happens in a fire when the roof falls in?

It is critical that you can keep the roof intact so that timbers is not falling down to the floor and spreading the fire. You ideally want to separate the high fire load of the roof from the low fire load in the rest of cathedral. Otherwise, you will have molten lead from the roof falling down onto firefighters below, which is a real danger as it will go straight through a helmet.

If a vault collapses, it introduces fresh air underneath the fire which is then turning a fire that might only be 600 degrees essentially into a forge where you pump air in underneath and the heat increases rapidly.  

In July 2021, the city of Paris was sued for lead contamination from Notre-Dame. For that to have happened, the temperature in the cathedral roof must have reached that where molten lead becomes vaporised. That is 1,700 degrees. The fire vapourised the lead which went up with the smoke. It then turned into dust as it cooled, the dust then fell onto the streets outside, heavily contaminating the tarmac.

How can we prevent fires in heritage buildings?

There haven’t been many cathedral fires in the world – we’ve only lost or had roof fires 69 times in the last 1000 years according to historical records.

We do, however, need to be careful about the presence of contractors carrying out restorative work. Many of these buildings have stood for over 600 years or more, but if you bring in hot works, or cold works such as the use of disc cutters, this creates a fire risk. All contractors – including for cold works – should have a hot works permit.

If somebody is carrying out hot work on the outside of a building, for example patching the lead roof, you need somebody inside that can access the risk area. Ideally, there should be a method being able to get water to any fire risk area via a system of ladders or internal scaffolding.

If an event a fire does happen, how should it be tackled?

Having information about the building is the number one priority for all fire rescue teams. They should have site specific risk information at the ready. They need to be aware of access to the roof. Most cathedrals had dry risers put in in the 1950s post-war after the use of incendiary bombs, but they’re not always in the best place.

If you took Bath Abbey, for example, the spiral staircases are at the east and west of the church, meaning they don’t go up in the central crossing and there’s nothing to allow access in the crossing, which is where the dry riser is. In this case, if firefighters will need to use the spiral stairs to get onto the roof, meaning they will be going across the burning roof before they can plug the hoses into the dry riser, which is not practical.

Canterbury Cathedral has had its roofs compartmented. They cut a hole in the roof to install a water mist system which – water mist is a practical solution as it reduces the risk of flooding. The only downside to it is the hole that has been made may does not allow them to look into the roof, so they might be directing the water mist at something that is not on fire.

Finally, built into most cathedrals ­but not all – at the bottom of the conoids is a scupper: a hole that goes through the outside wall to drain the water away. Fire teams also need to know whether the water that you’re putting on is going to leave and not flood, creating imbalance and causing the vaults to collapse.

With almost 12,000 members, the IFE continues to promote, encourage, and improve the science, practice and professionalism of fire engineering, acting as a beacon of established expertise and guiding the way to a fire safe future.

For more info on the IFE, visit their website for further information.

IFSJ Exclusive: Cleaning PPE by machine – the reality

Meiko looks at 3 case studies of European firefighters who are using the latest mask washing machines

Kehl Fire Department

What can you squeeze into six minutes?

That is not something Karlheinz Fimeyer has to worry about any longer when he is working in Kehl Fire Department’s BA mask cleaning room. Using the TopClean M to clean BA masks and regulators means that the BA equipment manager no longer has to search for something else to do at the same time.

That is because the shortest cycle of the washer-disinfector takes just six minutes. Previously he had to wait 45 minutes until everything was clean – but of course that was when the BA masks were still being cleaned in a conventional dishwasher.

“Kehl’s BA equipment maintenance team played an important role in developing the new Meiko TopClean M mask washing machine,” says MEIKO. “We worked with them to perfect the basket in which the masks are arranged for cleaning.

“Our development department designed special containers for the small mask components and we worked very closely with Karlheinz Fimeyer and his colleagues to find the best solution for cleaning regulators in the same machine, while keeping them at eight bar pressure during cleaning.”

Fimeyer enthuses about a quantum leap in mask cleaning: “Instead of having to leave the machine running while I find something else to do, I can now simply get everything done in one go.”

Stuttgart Airport Fire Service

Airport fire service takes occupational health and safety seriously when it comes to mask cleaning.

Stuttgart airport is the largest in BadenWürttemberg, and its fire department employs 81 people, all of whom are trained in the use of specialist breathing gear. The fire service has a stock of 140 breathing apparatus (BA) masks, and when Kevin Vogel and his colleagues pull them on they instinctively trust that everything is properly sealed, their compressed air cylinders are full, and there are no herpes or tuberculosis viruses – or indeed any other microorganisms – lurking in their masks.

Recently the three BA equipment managers have been cleaning the SCBA gear in a TopClean M from MEIKO.

The previous manual cleaning method with a formaldehyde solution had prompted numerous complaints to the airport fire chief because the BA equipment managers occasionally experienced unpleasant skin or respiratory complaints.

“Our in-house system for monitoring hazardous substances has been tightened up, so without the TopClean M I would have needed to go through the process of getting the cleaning chemicals approved for safety,” Rudlof tells. The TopClean M washer-disinfector has made that process unnecessary – and the new cleaning and disinfection machine is also saving the BA technicians a considerable amount of time.

“We clean the masks from a total of 40 fire services, though only after their training drills. Whenever a big training exercise takes place on-site at the airport, we typically have to clean 100 masks in one go,” says Rudlof.

The rapid and reliable cleaning cycles of the MEIKO TopClean M washer-disinfector make it an invaluable member of the BA cleaning and maintenance team. And if ever something goes wrong, the local MEIKO dealer is just 5 kilometres down the road and responds almost as fast as the fire service. Shift leader Moser neatly sums up the firefighters’ expectations: “Our needs are pretty simple. All we ask for is top-quality equipment.”

Fire Department Idar-Oberstein

Working in the fire service is often about acting fast and relying on instinct – but there are some jobs which take time and careful planning. Jörg Riemer, Fire Chief of the Idar-Oberstein Volunteer Fire Department, Udo Schuff, head of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) equipment, and Klaus Schneider are all fully trained BA equipment managers. They manage the equipment used by the 150 active firefighters deployed in this town in the Hunsrück region of Germany.

Famous as a gemstone centre, Idar-Oberstein’s fire service may be run on a volunteer basis, but these three men are municipal employees. They work full-time to ensure that all the firefighters’ gear works perfectly in the event of an emergency – including the personal protective equipment (PPE) that all their colleagues rely on.

Udo Schuff and his colleagues, who are all in their 50s, tried putting the individual mask components in a cloth bag and washing them in the washing machine they use for the firefighters’ duty gear.

“But unfortunately it didn’t work well enough so we had to finish off the cleaning by hand,” Schuff says. “We’re grateful to the city council for approving the purchase of a TopClean M in their budget. We’ve been using the machine to clean our 250 masks and regulators since September 2014,” Schuff says enthusiastically. Schuff’s colleague Jörg Riemer emphasises that one of the biggest advantages of the new solution is that “none of our full-time or volunteer equipment managers come into contact with detergents or disinfectants anymore”.

This is a key point, especially for Udo Schuff. He suffers from a chronic lung disease which means he is no longer able to wear breathing apparatus sets. His colleague Klaus Schneider is equally pleased with the decision they made: “The machine is exceptionally easy to use and actually produces better results than manual cleaning.”

Find out more about Meiko’s TopClean M at www.meiko-uk.co.uk

This article was originally published in the April edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

IFSJ Exclusive: PFAS Emergency with Vicki Quint

Vicki Quint looks at the impact of PFAS on firefighter health and the industry plans to phase out the substance

Phase-out plans for PFAS are in process for the State of California and Europe. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances seem to have been in perpetual phase[1]out for decades. A protracted-time span for the transition to non[1]fluorinated firefighting foams is not designed for protecting the public or firefighters.

 Since Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) containing PFAS have been contaminating water resources worldwide, it should be noted as stated by the European Environment Agency: “It is not just individual PFAS that are harmful: combined exposure to mixtures of PFAS — also known as the ‘cocktail effect’ — adds to the health pressures as explained in the zero pollution ‘Signal’ on chemical mixtures. Human exposure to PFAS has been estimated to cost €52- 84 billion in annual health costs in Europe.”

 Healthcare costs are an important aspect of PFAS contamination, as according to UPI the resulting economic burden of treating medical Vicki Quint looks at the impact of PFAS on firefighter health and the industry plans to phase out the substance conditions caused by PFAS, a group of more than 4,700 man-made chemicals, could cost Americans a minimum of $5.5 billion and as much as $63 billion.

Based on estimates, the cost of eradicating contamination and replacing this type of chemical with safer alternatives is entirely justifiable when considering the economic and medical risks of allowing them to persist in the environment.

“Human exposure to PFAS has been estimated to cost €52-84 billion in annual health costs in Europe.”

In a US Department of Defense (DoD) Progress Report on PFAS: “These problematic properties include being extremely persistent in the natural environment; potentially presenting human and ecological health risks; bioaccumulating and biomagnifying; and exhibiting physiochemical properties that challenge traditional handling, cleaning, and decontaminating methods.”

Previous transitions of C8 to C6 firefighting foams have shown that the replacement foam will take on the properties of the formerly used foam. According to the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team: “A good indicator that the foam contains PFAS is if it mentions fluorosurfactant, fluoroprotein, C6, or the use of “fluoro.”

However, International Chemical secretariat notes: “The C6 substances have turned out to be just as hazardous as the C8 ones, leading to a plethora of so-called regrettable substitution, which is when you swap one harmful chemical for an equally problematic one. So now, the C6 substances are subject to proposals called the PFHxA and PFHxS restrictions.”

Legal, insurance, regulatory and investment entities are all involved in PFAS chemicals. The implications for continued PFAS use are that: PFAS cannot be removed from blood – but there are on-going firefighter blood studies using blood draws as a method for lowering PFAS levels in individuals; there is inter-generational transfer of PFAS chemicals in humans; and firefighter children are more at risk for cancer.

US states are continuing to remove AFFF from fire departments in buyback and take-back programs. Funds are being allocated but they are not stretching far enough.

According to Fire Chief Joseph McHugh, Connecticut mandated the removal of PFAS from use by fire departments due to the health hazards to people caused by carcinogens in the foam. McHugh said the state had initially been expected to pay for the remediation but that is no longer the case, necessitating the use of town funds.

Whenever a firefighting foam product formulation is changed, it must be re-tested according to Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). If a product passes the same independent fire test, it would be logical to choose the foam product without PFAS or other carcinogens.

Total fluorine testing is a rapid screening method for use in measuring PFAS as testing for total PFAS can provide a more complete picture of PFAS contamination to support remediation, destruction and control efforts. Targeted analytical methods can often underestimate PFAS contamination. Other equipment used with AFFF will need to be replaced. Prevention is key since remediation costs are prohibitive. Costs will only increase with further delay and the prolonged use of PFAS.

The Foam Exposure Committee (FEC) recommends to stop using AFFF immediately. Remove or plug any fire apparatus that contains AFFF and do not use the foam. It will need to be properly removed from apparatus. Obtain F3 product as soon as practical. An external eductor can be used with F3 foam until new fire apparatus can be obtained. US fire departments have no regulations requiring them to use a fluorinated foam product.

The toxic nature of AFFF products has been known since 3M exited the PFOS business in 2000. That exit stretched out for two years. Now, 3M has announced a total exit from the PFAS manufacturing business.

“There are on-going firefighter blood studies using blood draws as a method for lowering PFAS levels in individuals.”

The AFFF Military Specification (MilSpec) has been the only foam product that limited PFAS. The US DoD released the new MilSpec for firefighting foam in early January 2023. The updated Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) FAA CertAlert 139 followed up with their notice on January 12, 2023.

The use of fluorinated foams is no longer a legal requirement. The FAA is now encouraging operators to use a suitable Fluorine Free alternative. They admit, however, that they have yet to identify one that meets the required MilSpec for use of foams in airports.

Fire departments continuing to use AFFF will keep contributing to their community’s PFAS contamination. You cannot clean up a mess until you stop the source. The priorities of an Incident Commander (IC) are: “Life safety, incident stabilization, and property conservation, as taught at the National Fire Academy.”

This article was originally published in the April edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

IFSJ Exclusive: Say hello to Cygnus

Austen Wells, Sales Manager at Cygnus, talks to International Fire & Safety Journal about the new brand

We are accustomed to using wireless technology in our every day lives. We use mobile phones with apps that allow us to turn our lighting on and off, switch on the TV, answer the doorbell and see who is outside, check our energy consumption and much, much more. However, when it comes to commercial building control, stakeholders have been sceptical about its use in their spaces.

Certainly, the wireless detection and fire alarm systems available on the market may not have had the capabilities and performance reliabilities required. But we are at now a point where wireless technology is robust enough and scalable enough to be used everywhere. 

Cygnus has harnessed its expertise with wireless technology to develop a game-changing, fully wireless and EN54 certified fire detection and alarm system called SmartNet. 

The name Cygnus derives from a constellation that was discovered in 1951 and is one of the strongest radio sources in the sky and reflects our development of the most powerful radio mesh network in any fire detection and alarm system. The brand has a strong heritage with over 10 years developing wireless technology, beginning with the launch of the original Cygnus radio evacuation systems for constructions sites, which became renowned for their range and reliability.

Launching SmartNet

The SmartNet range is designed to deliver a reliable and safe solution that offers significant reductions on fire alarm installation times as well as reduced costs for fire alarm installers, specifiers, M&E contractors and consultants. 

The system comprises of a comprehensive range of EN54 compliant and Construction Products Regulation (CPR 305/2011) certified fire detection and alarm devices suitable for permanent installation across all types of building environment.

Our intention for this wireless system is for it to be a game changer for installers. For the first time, it offers the sector a fully wireless system, which is quick and easy to install, and can be scaled effectively from small to large installations. SmartNet brings significant the operational and installation benefits of wireless technology to the market with no need for wired boosters, translators or any other wired element. It removes the often stressful first fix stage of an install.

By eliminating the need for cabling during installation, a SmartNet system can greatly reduce engineering time and the overall project cost.

Full training and support

The new system is designed to be fitted by SmartNet Certified Partners and Cygnus offers full training and technical support to its partners. The new Cygnus Academy is an in-person, high specification training hub for installers seeking to learn about the company’s new SmartNet wireless fire detection and alarm system.

Located at the company’s headquarters in Hereford, the Cygnus Academy provides a modern, fully equipped and comfortable environment where installers can complete the SmartNet one-day training course to become a Cygnus Certified Partner. The SmartNet course, combining both theoretical and practical training, provides detailed insights into SmartNet technology and the skills required to carry out a successful installation.

SmartNet is set to revolutionise the fire safety industry. It is a reliable, safe and a quick to install solution, built on wireless mesh network technology, that will transform the way you work, help you deal effectively with labour shortages and improve your business efficiency. It is also a highly sustainable solution that will substantially reduce the amount of copper wiring and other materials you use on a project.

Cygnus is not stopping with just launching SmartNet – our Cygnus Academy and our dedicated technical support services ensure we can offer our customers everything they need to deliver successful projects.

The Cygnus team will be at The Fire Safety Event on stand 3a/B10.

To become a Cygnus Certified Partner, installers need to attend training at the Cygnus Academy – for more details get in touch here: help@cygnus-academy.com. For more information visit, www.cygnus-systems.com.

This article was originally published in the April edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

IFSJ Exclusive: Setting the standard for compliance with Profab Access

Marcus Parnham, Commercial Director at Profab Access, explores the implication of The Building Safety Act

The Building Safety Act 2022 presents a new era of accountability for the construction industry that will improve the standards of buildings and secure the safety of people within them, and it comes with implications for professionals responsible for the specification, installation and maintenance of fire-critical building products.   

The Competence Steering Group’s Setting the Bar report aims to achieve a system of competence standards that all those in life-safety-critical disciplines working on higher-risk buildings should adopt, in line with Dame Judith Hackitt’s Building a Safer Future report.

For professionals responsible for the procurement, construction, inspection and maintenance of buildings, these objectives can be achieved in part by specifying and installing building components that are supplied with comprehensive third party certification, which helps to safeguard the suitability and safety of a building for its entire lifecycle.

Currently, some concerns remain in relation to ambiguities regarding guidelines and regulations for the testing of building materials. In relation to fire integrity riser doors for non-residential buildings, there are disparities between the guidelines outlined in BS EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018 and clause C3 of Approved Document B2.

Where a door leaf is totally symmetrical, Part 1 of BS EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018 allows for testing from one side only. In contrast, clause C3 of Approved Document B2 stipulates that each side of the door leaf should receive separate test exposure, irrespective of whether the door leaf is symmetrical.

Different manufacturers take different approaches to address this. Some may conduct product assessments via a third party once in the product lifecycle, whilst others may undertake third-party testing of both sides of the door leaf, supported by on going third party certification, to evidence their products are consistently suitable for installation.

While the National Construction Products Regulator will have the ability to conduct its own tests of building materials specified in fire-critical environments, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to guarantee the products they supply are suitable for the proposed application.

It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to guarantee the products they supply are suitable for the proposed application.

However, this responsibility is also shared by the customer. Construction professionals need to make their own decision about how best to obtain assurance as to the performance of fire integrity riser doors. Certainly, third party assessment of performance is a minimum, but a higher degree of confidence can be obtained by specifying products from companies that have undergone third party accreditation and whose building products are supplied with comprehensive certification and test reports on an ongoing, rather than one off, basis. 

Due diligence

By evidencing comprehensive due diligence through the procurement of riser doors that have been bi-directionally tested by a third party and are supplied with ongoing certification and test reports, rather than single product assessments, construction professionals can be confident that no assumptions have been made regarding the suitability and performance of the materials installed, including whether the door set will perform effectively from both directions of exposure. This subsequently ensures the long-term suitability and safety of the building for its entire lifecycle.

One off product assessments alone do not provide continuous surveillance and assurance of consistency and quality.

This is because continuous testing programmes provide continued assurance with regard to the product being supplied, whereas one off product assessments alone do not provide continuous surveillance and assurance of consistency and quality.

This is further reflected in third-party testers’ continued involvement throughout the entire manufacturing process, which helps to ascertain that manufacturers are implementing appropriate measures to maintain manufacturing consistency and that the products tested are genuinely representative of production.

With regard to riser doors in particular, extensive third party bi-directional testing to BS EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018 of both sides of the door leaf evidences that a manufacturer has gone above the minimum requirements detailed in BS EN 1634 to meet the requirements defined in clause C3 of Approved Document B2.

Professionals should also check that third-party testing has been undertaken for the complete doorset, including each individual component, to successfully validate overall performance.

Beyond the testing of the doorset itself, it is also critical that it is installed into an approved wall construction in a method consistent with the sample originally tested. This reflects points first raised in Dame Hackitt’s review that the fire resistance of a building product should be tested in ‘real-world conditions’, to be certain that all performance figures stated by the manufacturer are factual and representative of the likely performance of the final installation.

By specifying rising doors where both sides of the door leaf have been separately tested by an independent third-party passive fire product certification scheme, any ambiguity is removed, as the certification also states the approved application for each wall construction type, eliminating any requirement for interpretation.

Practical risks

In practice, the installation process of a riser door poses a number of risks to the overall fire integrity of the construction through variables such as the packer type and intumescent mastic bead application.

One solution to this could be by selecting steel riser doors that include adjustable frames with an integral intumescent strip to provide fire stopping between the wall and frame. This not only eliminates the requirement of packers and a dry liner’s reliance on the correct thickness of intumescent mastic bead, but also helps confirm the compliance and adequacy of the entire installation, as its fire integrity performance has been sufficiently documented by an independent assessor. This also subsequently increases the efficiencies of installation and reduces potential margins for error.

By considering the individual elements that forms part of the entire installation and ensuring that the relevant components have undergone the necessary testing and certification processes, professionals can not only streamline the initial design and specification stages, but can also benefit from an extensive digital audit trail that documents compliance and product suitability at every stage of the construction process.

For further information visit profabaccess.com

This article was originally published in the April edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

IFSJ Exclusive: The Evolution of Fire Detection with GFE

João Paulo Ajami, Managing Director and Founder at Global Fire Equipment (GFE), talks about the evolution of the fire detection company

How did you get started in the fire industry?

I first became interested in electronics when I was around 12. By the time I was 20 (in 1977), I started working in the electronics lab of a security company, working in repairs and development. In 1983, I launched my first company – a security manufacturing company – where we produced control panels for intrusion alarms. By 1986, we were supplying most of the security companies in Portugal before I sold the company.

I moved into fire detection through a collaboration between the company I was working for in Lisbon and I.A.S. Electronics in the early 1990s. Our plan was to establish a joint venture to manufacture fire alarm control panels in Lisbon. That fell through but I was then invited to move to England and help I.A.S. develop a new range of products. I stayed there until Spring 1993 when I moved to Denmark with my Danish fiancée.

In 1994, I established Global Fire Equipment, known as I.A.S. Denmark at that time. In 1998, the parent company I.A.S. Electronics was acquired, and our collaboration was left in limbo. I decided it was time to branch out on our own.

Why did you make the move to Portugal?

By 2000, we were doing a lot more manufacturing and needed to relocate to somewhere where it would be more cost effective to operate. I decided to move the company to Portugal – being Portuguese it was a natural move. Right from the beginning we opted to base the company in the Algarve. The quality of life in the south of Portugal is far better than in Lisbon. We were also in a place where there is very little other industry in terms of manufacturing which put us in a good position in terms of finding and retaining labour resources.

The fire safety sector is constantly evolving – how do you stay agile?

We keep re-inventing ourselves. The big difference between GFE and most of our competitors is that we are technology driven rather than commercially driven. We understand the importance of innovating and developing new products. We also understand that you always need to listen to customers – old and new – to understand the challenges they face. This is what sets GFE apart from our competition.

The challenging part is being able to continually innovate and deliver what the customers ask of us within their regulatory framework. We ensure that everything we do always conforms to the requirements of each customer’s regional regulation.

What different requirements are there in different regions and how you work to meet these?

The most important thing is listening to our customers. The big advantage we have against the larger corporations is that we work across more than 90 countries worldwide. This means we are fully versed in the differing requirements in countries all over the world.

What did you learn from working with them?

Well of course you need to understand the different legal systems. For example, in an unregulated market like Brazil almost anything goes. So, we spend a lot of time helping educate them so they understand that they are protecting lives and should pay attention to what the system is doing.

In comparison, our Scandinavian customers demand exceptionally high levels of functionality and reliability. There is a wide range of requirements, and we listen to all of them. It’s not easy, but it is a necessity and can be rewarding.

What are GFE’s biggest milestones as a company so far?

When we moved to the Algarve, we had been active for six years and we moved into a 200sq m facility. Seven years later, we moved to an industrial park where we had an 800sqm facility. In 2013, we moved again to an old mushroom canning facility that was 3,400sq m and at the start of 2023 we moved into a new estate converted from a cork transformation factory, which spans around 7,500 Sq m, with the option to expand up to 16,000sq m.

From a technology and staff point of view, we went from mainly supplying control panels to making our own range of sensors back in 2012. We decided we needed to have our own manufacturing facilities for everything in the fire detection system, so we parted with our detector supplier and designed and started making our own. This was the biggest milestone because it meant increasing our manufacturing by more than 60%. Today, we have a state-of-the art manufacturing facility and are able to cope with anything that is thrown at us.

What is GFE’s main focus for the years ahead?

Our goal is to strengthen our production capability – that is 100% necessary. We are looking to increase our autonomy and go into metal working because that’s the only thing we don’t do in-house currently.

Back in 2018, we acquired Createch, a company from the North of Portugal that specialises in emergency lighting. They were operating exclusively in Portugal and are the number two player in Portugal in their field. It’s an exciting opportunity that’s very much on the horizon but for now we are focused in growing the core fire safety business in new regions around the world.

This article was originally published in the April edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

IFSJ Exclusive: Preliminary Exposure Reduction

Tonya Herbert, President at Thin Red Line Decon, looks at building decontamination habits to reduce firefighter health risks

Today’s fires produce a toxic soup of dangerous chemicals, likely because of the changing landscape of building materials and furnishings. While turnout gear effectively protects against thermal exposure and hazardous fluids, it may not protect against absorption of soot. Emerging research suggests that dermal absorption of toxins is a greater route of exposure than inhalation or ingestion.

The NFPA 1851 standard encourages ‘Preliminary Exposure Reduction,’ defined as ‘techniques for reducing soiling and contamination levels … following incident operations.’ A recent study affirmed this need for fireground exposure reduction interventions. 

Changing your behavior to make preliminary exposure reduction a habit can seem daunting; however, making tiny marginal improvements consistently can yield significant results. A habit is a behavior that has been repeated enough to become automatic.

A habit is a behavior that has been repeated enough to become automatic

The first step in a habit loop is the cue. A cue gets your attention and tells you what to do next. It predicts a reward. Cravings are the second step. They are the motivational force behind every habit and without them, we have no reason to act. These first two steps compromise the “Problem Phase.” The third step of a habit loop is the response. This is the actual habit you form, the action you perform (in this case, decontaminating). The final step that closes the loop is the reward. This is the end goal of every habit. These last two steps form the ‘Solution Phase’. 

To build better habits, you need to build a better system, one that sets you up for success. At first, these tiny habit routines may seem insignificant, but they build on each other, compounding, and can lead to remarkable changes.

Make it obvious

The process of changing behavior starts with awareness. Start by analysing your current decontamination protocol. What do you do between coming out of an IDLH environment or ending suppression activities and returning to the station? By becoming aware of your habits, including whether or not you perform the desired habit, the time at which you perform the habit, and where you perform the habit, you raise them from an unconscious level to a conscious level.

When you make a specific plan for performing a new habit, you are more likely to follow through

To make a new habit obvious, create an implementation intention, which is a plan you make beforehand about how, where, and when you intend to act. For instance, your implementation intention may be ‘Before I come off air, I will enter the ‘green zone’ (or decontamination area) and perform preliminary exposure reduction.’ Or ‘As soon as I doff my gear, I will wash my hands and face with soap and water’. When you make a specific plan for performing a new habit, you are more likely to follow through.

A second strategy is to pair the new habit with a current habit. Habit stacking works by finding one you have mastered and concisely tying the new behavior into it. For instance, “After loading hose back on the truck, personnel will use wipes to remove soot from permeable areas of the body.”

To increase your odds of success, try designing your environment to provide multiple cues. Considering that over half of the brain is devoted to processing visual information, a visual cue may be the most important tool for making a new habit obvious. Try placing a sticker that reads “Did You Decon?” in a location where you will see it before climbing back onto the engine.

Make it attractive

Desire is what drives most behavior. The more attractive an opportunity is, the more likely it is to become habit-forming. If you anticipate that a particular habit will be rewarding, you are more motivated to repeat that action.

An improvement in long-term health is delayed gratification. To make post-fire decontamination more desirable, a firefighter must feel satisfied immediately. Therefore, it is important to develop a protocol where a firefighter feels clean. From the brand of wipes to the detergent you use, it is important to include the field personnel in the selection. Buy-in is critical.

Another way to make the new habit more enticing is to pair an action you need to do with the one you want to do. The first thing you want to do is get into rehab, cool down, and get a drink. If you pair your on-scene decontamination with your rehab routine, you will probably perform it more regularly. As you enter rehab and doff your gear, your next step should be immediately wiping down your skin, especially before you ingest any food or drink.

The desire to fit in within the fire service is strong. When unsure how to act, we look to the group we are a part of for clues. If our behavior is rewarded with approval, praise, or respect, it becomes more attractive. Inversely, when behavior is mocked or criticised, it is unattractive. Therefore, it is critical that influencers within the department, particularly the company officers, support and model the decontamination protocol.

While making a new habit attractive is one strategy, making a bad habit unattractive is another approach. The Boston Fire Department has employed this technique in their Memorial Wall, displaying hundreds of black and white photos of the members of their department who have died in the line of duty from cancer. By highlighting the consequences of a negative habit, they have made it much less desirable. It is an incredibly compelling tactic, one that is hard to ignore.

Make it easy

The key to mastering a habit is to start with repetition, not perfection. You may not have all the details of the decontamination protocol figured out; you just need to start practicing it. The more frequently you perform the behavior, the more automatic it will become. For instance, if you decontaminate every time you handle a nozzle, even for a dumpster fire, soon you will be decontaminating without even thinking about it.

The more friction there is to engage in a behavior, the less likely you are to act on it. Therefore, two other critical components in this third step of the habit loop are to make it convenient and to prime the environment. If your department uses a decontamination bucket, at the beginning of every shift, make sure the necessary components are in the bucket – wipes, a hose, a nozzle, cleaning detergent, a scrub brush, and clear bags for dirty gear, etc. Place the bucket where it is likely to be seen and utilised. Upon return to the station after a call, the bucket should be immediately reset after personnel and gear are fully decontaminated.

A habit is much more likely to stick if it takes less than two minutes to accomplish. If on-scene decontamination is too big of leap, start smaller. Place a wipe in the pocket of your bunker jacket or bunker pants. This makes it convenient, and you have primed the environment. If it doesn’t require much effort you are more likely to stick with it.

Make it satisfying

The final step of the habit loop is to make it satisfying – making it satisfying increases the likelihood of repetition. Additionally, and not surprisingly, the highest value is placed on instant gratification, not on future gratification.

The highest value is placed on instant gratification, not on future gratification

This can be accomplished in multiple ways. First, choose methods and products personnel find pleasing and effective. If you feel you are cleaner, smell better, and feel fresher, the positive sensory perception makes it easier to adopt the habit. The pleasure sends a signal to your brain to repeat this behavior.

Using a habit tracker can also provide instant gratification. There are multiple exposure reporting systems available to the fire service, such as NFORS (National Fire Operating Reporting System) Career Diary and Enviage’s Exposure Tracker. By utilising one of these exposure reporting systems on an individual level, not only are you documenting critical information should you ever be diagnosed with an occupational illness, but you can use them to track your preliminary exposure reduction habits.

Having an accountability partner, such as the company officer, can increase the chances of successfully establishing a habit. A company officer who models appropriate behavior or who calls out members who are not decontaminating can have tremendous influence on the process.

By creating a routine that is manageable, easy to do, and requires as little energy as possible, you can make a preliminary exposure reduction habit stick. When this habit sticks, you can reduce your risk of occupational illness giving you a better chance to live a quality life, long into retirement.

This article was originally published in the April edition of IFSJ. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.