Siderise challenges Kensington and Chelsea building material exclusion in court

by ConstructionFeatured NewsPassive

Judicial review initiated over Siderise product exclusion

Siderise Insulation Ltd has initiated judicial review proceedings against the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC).

The company is seeking the withdrawal and reversal of an RBKC decision made on 11 December 2024, which excludes Siderise products from construction projects within the borough.

RBKC’s decision is based on criteria linked to the Grenfell Tower fire.

Siderise argues that the criteria are being applied incorrectly in its case.

The company states that while its products were used in the Grenfell Tower refurbishment, the Grenfell Inquiry Report does not attribute any responsibility to the firm for the fire or its spread.

Siderise challenges basis of RBKC decision

RBKC’s exclusion policy targets companies that the council deems to have engaged in dishonesty, incompetence, or misleading behaviour related to the Grenfell tragedy.

Siderise states that the Grenfell Inquiry found no evidence of dishonesty or incompetence on its part.

The company contends that RBKC’s decision is unjustified and does not align with the inquiry’s findings.

Protecting company reputation and industry role

Siderise has positioned itself as a supplier of external passive fire protection products and states that it has worked to improve industry standards since the Grenfell fire.

The company emphasises that the exclusion by RBKC affects its reputation and its ability to provide fire protection solutions in the UK and internationally.

RBKC has acknowledged that some companies were excluded from the decision due to a lack of evidence of wrongdoing.

Siderise argues that it should fall within this category.

Siderise reaffirms commitment to building safety

Despite the legal proceedings, Siderise has stated that it remains committed to advancing building safety through its products, systems, and services.

The company continues to work towards higher industry standards and compliance.

Siderise has framed its challenge against RBKC as an effort to protect its standing as a British manufacturer supplying fire safety solutions worldwide.

Judicial review initiated over Siderise product exclusion: Summary

Siderise Insulation Ltd has launched judicial review proceedings against the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea following a decision on 11 December 2024 that excludes its products from construction projects in the borough.

The exclusion is based on criteria linked to the Grenfell Tower fire.

Siderise argues that the Grenfell Inquiry Report does not support the exclusion, as there was no finding of dishonesty, incompetence, or misleading behaviour by the company.

RBKC has stated that some companies were not included in its exclusion policy due to a lack of evidence against them, and Siderise believes it should be among them.

The company is taking legal action to challenge the decision and protect its reputation.

Siderise has stated that it remains focused on building safety and supporting industry standards through its products and services.

HSE launches consultation on Approved Document A for building structures in England

by Building ManagementFeatured NewsResearchSafety

HSE seeks feedback on structural safety guidance

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has launched a consultation to gather views on the future of Approved Document A, which provides guidance on structural safety regulations in England.

According to CROSS UK, the call for evidence is open until 21 April 2025 and invites responses from individuals and organisations through an online survey or by email.

This consultation is the first step in a broader review process aimed at ensuring the guidance remains effective.

Approved Document A and its role in building regulations

Approved Document A is part of the statutory guidance that supports compliance with the Building Regulations.

It sets out practical methods to meet structural safety requirements, helping developers, engineers, and regulators adhere to national standards.

Building Regulations cover health, safety, security, access, and sustainability aspects of construction.

The Approved Documents provide a framework for ensuring compliance with these legal requirements.

Consultation details and how to participate

The consultation will run for ten weeks from 10 February 2025.

HSE has encouraged stakeholders to respond via an online survey, which facilitates a more efficient analysis of feedback.

Alternatively, responses can be submitted by email or post.

Participants are asked to specify whether they are responding as individuals or on behalf of an organisation, providing relevant contact details for verification.

Geographical scope and next steps

The call for evidence applies to England only, and there is no impact assessment associated with this consultation.

The responses collected will inform future updates to Approved Document A and contribute to the wider review of structural safety guidance.

HSE’s Technical Policy Team is managing the consultation, and further details on submission methods and contact information are available on the HSE website.

HSE launches consultation on Approved Document A for building structures in England: Summary

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has opened a consultation on Approved Document A, which provides guidance on structural safety under England’s Building Regulations.

The consultation runs from 10 February to 21 April 2025 and seeks input from industry professionals and the public.

Approved Document A is part of the statutory guidance supporting the Building Regulations, helping to ensure compliance with structural safety requirements.

The consultation is open to responses via an online survey, email, or post.

HSE has encouraged participants to specify whether they are responding as individuals or on behalf of an organisation.

This call for evidence applies only to England and does not include an impact assessment.

The feedback collected will contribute to a broader review of structural safety regulations.

Further details, including submission options and contact information, are available on the HSE website.

Fire-resistant honeycomb panels launched by Viva for safer buildings

by Building ManagementConstructionFeatured NewsPassiveProducts

Viva announces fire-resistant FR A1-rated aluminium panels

Viva has introduced its FR A1-rated Honeycomb Panels, designed to enhance fire safety in architecture.

The company states that these panels meet the highest fire resistance standards under European Standard EN 13501-1, ensuring non-combustibility and zero contribution to fire, smoke, or toxic emissions.

According to Viva, the panels are engineered for safety-critical environments, including high-rise buildings, airports, commercial complexes, hospitals, and educational institutions.

The honeycomb core structure provides durability while maintaining a lightweight profile, making it suitable for modern construction.

Compliance with international fire safety standards

The FR A1 rating indicates that the panels meet stringent fire safety requirements.

This classification, under the European Standard EN 13501-1, ensures that the panels do not contribute to fire, smoke, or toxic emissions.

Viva states that the panels have undergone rigorous testing to confirm their performance in extreme fire conditions.

These safety features align with international fire safety regulations, addressing the growing need for fire-resistant materials in construction projects worldwide.

The company highlights that the panels can be integrated into various architectural applications without compromising safety.

Structural benefits and design flexibility

Viva’s honeycomb panels are designed to balance fire resistance with structural integrity.

The honeycomb core allows for strength while keeping the material lightweight, making it easier to install and transport.

The company states that this construction method enhances durability and ensures long-term performance.

Additionally, the panels come with customisable finishes, enabling their use in different architectural designs.

The manufacturer notes that this flexibility allows architects and developers to incorporate fire-resistant materials without aesthetic limitations.

Industry perspectives on fire safety solutions

Nitin Jain, Director of Viva Composite Panel Pvt. Ltd., commented on the product’s development: “At Viva, safety, innovation, and sustainability drive our product development.

“Our FR A1-rated Honeycomb Panels are a testament to this commitment, offering architects and developers an unparalleled solution for fire-safe construction.”

With increasing fire safety regulations in urban developments, manufacturers of building materials are introducing solutions that meet strict compliance requirements.

Viva’s new panels are positioned as a response to this demand, providing an option that integrates fire resistance, durability, and environmental considerations.

Fire-resistant honeycomb panels launched by Viva for safer buildings: Summary

Viva has introduced its FR A1-rated Honeycomb Panels, which meet the highest fire resistance classification under the European Standard EN 13501-1.

Designed for use in high-rise buildings, airports, commercial complexes, hospitals, and educational institutions, they provide a fire-safe construction option without compromising design flexibility.

The honeycomb core structure aims to ensure durability while keeping the panels lightweight, making them suitable for various architectural applications.

Viva states that the panels have undergone rigorous testing to confirm their performance under extreme fire conditions.

The company highlights their compliance with international safety regulations, addressing the demand for fire-resistant materials in modern construction.

Nitin Jain, Director of Viva Composite Panel Pvt. Ltd., said the panels reflect the company’s commitment to safety, innovation, and sustainability.

CSCS updates Labourer and Trainee card requirements under Building Safety Act

by ConstructionSafetyTraining

Changes to Labourer card validity and renewal criteria

CSCS has announced changes to the Labourer and Trainee cards from 1 February to align with competency expectations under the Building Safety Act.

The revisions aim to encourage new entrants to start on a ‘Red’ card with a recognised training pathway.

The Labourer card’s initial validity will now be two years instead of five.

To renew for five years, operatives must provide evidence of employment as a labourer.

Additionally, the CITB Health, Safety and Environment Test validity will extend to three years, allowing continued use for card renewal.

Revised eligibility criteria for Trainee card

CSCS has introduced a simplified pathway for individuals with prior training to obtain a Trainee card.

Those who have completed an approved Level 2 or higher occupation-related non-competence qualification will now be eligible for a two-year Trainee card.

The updated requirements aim to make it easier for new entrants with relevant qualifications to access the industry while ensuring workers meet competency standards.

CSCS has provided a flowchart detailing the available routes to a Trainee card.

Industry Accreditation cards no longer valid

CSCS confirmed that all cards issued via Industry Accreditation have now expired.

Individuals previously holding these cards must obtain a qualification to move onto the appropriate card.

To support this transition, CITB funding has been extended until 31 March 2026 to help individuals gain the required qualifications.

This extension provides additional time for those affected to meet the updated competency standards.

Supporting compliance with the Building Safety Act

The updates to CSCS card requirements are part of broader efforts to align with the Building Safety Act’s competency expectations.

The changes are designed to ensure construction workers meet the necessary standards and encourage structured training and qualification pathways.

The adjustments aim to improve competency verification and maintain safety and compliance in the construction industry.

More details on the revised card requirements are available through CSCS.

CSCS updates Labourer and Trainee card requirements under Building Safety Act: Summary

CSCS has announced changes to its Labourer and Trainee card requirements, effective 1 February, to align with the Building Safety Act.

The Labourer card will now be valid for two years, with a five-year renewal available to those proving employment in a labouring role.

The CITB Health, Safety and Environment Test validity has been extended to three years.

A new pathway has been introduced for Trainee cards, allowing individuals with an approved Level 2 or higher qualification to obtain a two-year card.

CSCS has confirmed that all Industry Accreditation cards have expired, and funding for qualification support is available until 31 March 2026.

The changes are part of efforts to ensure workers meet competency standards and follow recognised training pathways.

Tribunal orders fire safety works for Paddington residential block

by ConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

Tribunal ruling mandates remediation at 5 Praed Street

A judge has ruled that fire safety works must be completed within 19 months at a Paddington residential block with combustible cladding.

Behbehani Middle East Trading Company, the Kuwait-incorporated owner of 5 Praed Street, must replace the cladding and address other safety concerns following a tribunal case brought by Westminster City Council.

The tribunal ruling requires the company to conduct a fire door survey, upgrade fire detection systems, and install wayfinding signage.

The building, which is currently unoccupied due to safety concerns, must undergo these works by October 2026.

Westminster council pursued tribunal action over delays

Westminster City Council initiated legal action to ensure the necessary fire safety improvements were completed.

Although no residents currently occupy the building, the council argued that the ongoing fire risks required urgent action.

Additionally, officials highlighted the need for more housing in London, pushing for the property’s return to residential use.

Following the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, Westminster requested that owners of buildings over 18 metres tall confirm whether they contained ACM cladding. 5 Praed Street was among those identified.

Lack of government funding delayed remediation efforts

When the presence of ACM cladding was confirmed, the building was being used for overseas student accommodation.

The premises were vacated while the freeholder considered remediation options.

Because the property is classified as a commercial building, it did not qualify for government funding allocated for the removal of unsafe cladding from residential high-rises.

The council issued a hazard awareness notice in October 2019, followed by a prohibition order nearly three years later.

This prevented the building from being occupied until all safety risks were addressed.

Deadline set for completion of fire safety works

The tribunal has now issued a formal order requiring Behbehani Middle East Trading Company to complete all necessary remediation work by October 2026.

Cllr Aicha Less, Westminster’s cabinet member for public protection and licensing, said: “The safety of buildings is a primary concern. We welcome the decision of Judge Carr to make a remediation order at 5 Praed Street, ensuring that the unsafe cladding will be removed, and vital accommodation will be brought back into use.”

Behbehani Middle East Trading Company was contacted by London News Online for comment.

Tribunal orders fire safety works for Paddington residential block: Summary

A tribunal has ruled that Behbehani Middle East Trading Company must complete fire safety remediation at 5 Praed Street, Paddington, by October 2026.

The order follows Westminster City Council’s legal action to address delays in removing combustible cladding and implementing safety measures.

The property has been unoccupied since 2017, when ACM cladding was identified.

The council initially issued a hazard awareness notice in 2019 and later a prohibition order.

The building did not qualify for government safety funding due to its commercial status.

The tribunal ruling requires the company to replace the cladding, conduct a fire door survey, install wayfinding signage, and upgrade fire detection systems.

The council has welcomed the decision, citing both safety concerns and housing demand.

Validity of EWS1 forms questioned after fire engineer sanction

by Building ManagementConstructionSafety

Fire Protection Association raises concerns over EWS1 forms

The Fire Protection Association (FPA) has reported concerns over the validity of some External Wall System (EWS1) forms following disciplinary action against fire engineer Adam Kiziak.

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE) suspended Kiziak for six months in August 2024 after finding breaches of its code of conduct, including failure to maintain adequate professional indemnity insurance and working outside professional competence.

In December 2024, Inside Housing reported that independent audits commissioned by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) had overturned some of Kiziak’s fire risk assessments.

On 21 January 2025, IFE confirmed that the sanction against Kiziak had been extended due to ongoing complaints, which remain under investigation.

The organisation stated that the sanction would stay in place until investigations concluded.

Mortgage lenders respond to concerns over EWS1 forms

Following Kiziak’s suspension, mortgage lender Nationwide temporarily halted lending on buildings that had been signed off by Kiziak and Tri Fire.

A spokesperson for Nationwide told Inside Housing: “We take building safety very seriously and Tri Fire’s current suspension means that we are temporarily unable to make lending decisions based on its reports without further information and validation.”

The spokesperson added that responsibility for ensuring valid reports rested with building owners.

Nationwide stated that it was working with stakeholders to address cases impacted by the suspension.

IFE acknowledged the impact of the issue on mortgage approvals and stated that it was engaging with UK Finance to assess the broader implications of its member sanctions.

UK Finance advised individuals with concerns to contact their mortgage lenders directly.

Housing associations and public bodies take action

Notting Hill Genesis issued guidance to leaseholders on 27 January 2025 regarding EWS1 forms rejected by lenders.

The housing association stated that its internal review of the peer review process used by Tri Fire found it to be insufficiently robust.

As a result, Notting Hill Genesis announced that it would cease using Tri Fire and instead commission new EWS1 forms through alternative fire engineering consultants.

It also warned leaseholders that fire engineer demand was high and waiting times could exceed the current 8 to 10 weeks.

Tri Fire suspended from government-approved panel

Homes England has suspended Tri Fire from its panel of firms approved to carry out fire risk appraisals of external walls (FRAEWs) under the Cladding Safety Scheme (CSS).

As reported by Construction News, a Freedom of Information request revealed that Tri Fire had completed more than 60 FRAEWs for CSS applicants before its suspension.

A spokesperson for Homes England stated that the organisation was aware of the allegations against Tri Fire and had suspended the firm from its assessor panel.

The spokesperson added that an audit was underway to review Tri Fire reports, with additional control measures in place for assessments conducted before the suspension.

Michael Wharfe, partner at Devonshires law firm, told Construction News that ensuring the accuracy of fire risk assessments was essential before CSS applications or remedial work proceeded.

A lawyer acting for Tri Fire told BBC News that the firm was working to resolve the issues and was considering alternative peer review options.

Validity of EWS1 forms questioned after fire engineer sanction: Summary

Concerns have been raised over the validity of some EWS1 forms following the suspension of fire engineer Adam Kiziak by the Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE).

Kiziak was sanctioned in August 2024 for breaches of professional standards, with the sanction extended in January 2025 due to further complaints.

Mortgage lender Nationwide temporarily halted lending decisions on properties assessed by Kiziak and Tri Fire.

IFE stated that it was engaging with UK Finance to address the impact of the issue on mortgage approvals.

Notting Hill Genesis announced it would no longer use Tri Fire for EWS1 assessments following an internal review.

Homes England suspended Tri Fire from its approved panel for the Cladding Safety Scheme, pending an audit of previous fire risk assessments.

A lawyer representing Tri Fire said the firm was working to resolve the situation.

Quelfire’s technical solutions ensure compliance at Wales’ largest health and research hub

by Featured NewsPeople

Pentre Awel is the first development of its scope and size in Wales and one of the highest-valued schemes Carmarthenshire County Council has undertaken. This £84 million project covers 83 acres and has created an estimated 1,800 jobs.

The scheme provides medical research and health care, encouraging individuals to lead active lifestyles. Pentre Awel also includes integrated care and physical rehabilitation facilities and hopes to boost the local economy by £467 million over the next 15 years.

As the chosen passive fire protection system manufacturer, Quelfire worked alongside the main contractor, Bouygues Construction Ltd and all the relevant parties to deliver this project.

The main objective was to incorporate an early engagement approach to design and build Pentre Awel around the tested details available, creating safe and compliant buildings.

Challenges of the project

As this was one of Bouygues UK’s first early engagement projects utilising a new approach and systems, the initial cooperation of relevant parties proved to be the main challenge.

This later led to the coordination of service spacings being problematic due to the large number of services used on the project, steel beams and restricted space available.

Solutions to the issue

Bouygues UK’s initiative to implement a new system called Morta ensured Bouygues completed work in line with the Building Safety Act and built the Golden Thread of Information to hand over to the building owner on completion of the project. It also guaranteed they met Building Regulation 38 requirements.

The Morta system ensured that all service penetrations were covered. If critical information was not provided, the schedule would go back to the responsible person to collate and send over.

The idea of a clear ‘Builder’s Work in Connection’ (BWIC) opening schedule is to make sure all parties work together, take responsibility, and understand what is required.

To provide the most relevant firestopping tested solutions from Quelfire’s extensive library, Quelfire required a detailed schedule with specific information about the project’s service penetration applications.

This included information about the wall or floor construction, the required fire rating, and the dimensions of structural openings.

Additionally, they needed to know if the application involved a head-of-wall scenario, whether any movement was required, and details about the services – such as their type, material, size, and any insulation requirements, including thickness.

However, receiving the information and getting everyone on the same page proved to be quite challenging as, for many, this was a brand-new approach to building construction. Luckily, Pentre Awel discussions began in 2022, leading to the first early engagement meeting in January 2023.

After this, Quelfire had regular project meetings and workshops to discuss the firestopping package, BWIC openings and any non-standard details. This ensured all parties were on the same page and could provide the correct information, minimising confusion.

Senior BIM Coordinator, Bouygues, Tom Marsh’s statement

Tom Marsh, Senior BIM Coordinator at Bouygues, stated: “Quelfire have been very proactive in supporting our Golden Thread initiative via our Information Management platforms.

They have also provided a lot of technical insight which we have used to improve on Pentre Awel processes, as well as other projects moving forward.”

Design Manager, Bouygues, Matthew John’s statement

Matthew John, Design Manager at Bouygues, said: “Quelfire’s Technical Manager, Alec, has supported the Pentre Awel design team throughout the detailed design stage, giving pragmatic guidance on tested passive fire stopping solutions.

“This support has been invaluable in assisting Bouygues in delivering our Golden Thread builders work approval process.”

Quelfire provide technical solutions to Wales research and health hub: Summary

Pentre Awel is the first development of its size in Wales and it hopes to boost the local economy by £467 million over the next 15 years. Quelfire worked alongside Bouygues Construction Ltd to complete the project.

Bouygues Design Manager said that the support and advice from Quelfire has been invaluable.

Victaulic highlights solutions to labour shortages in UK and EU construction

by ConstructionFeatured NewsSafety

Labour shortages in construction industry

As noted by Victaulic, the construction sector is facing significant challenges related to workforce shortages.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) in the UK reported that, as of May 2024, 21% of businesses with 10 or more employees were experiencing labour shortages, including in construction.

Similarly, the Construction Skills Network (CSN) projects a demand for an additional 251,000 construction workers in the UK by 2028.

Across the EU, the European Employment Services Network (EURES) highlighted that construction had the fourth-highest job vacancy rate in Q2 2023, with this rate rising faster than in any other sector since 2016.

Addressing challenges with innovative product design

Victaulic emphasises the importance of simplifying installation processes to address labour shortages and skill gaps.

The company’s Installation-Ready technology is designed to streamline work by reducing complexity and minimising errors.

These products arrive ready to be installed without requiring disassembly, improving efficiency and reliability.

Victaulic reports that its grooved sprinklers and couplings enable quicker and more accurate installations, even with less experienced crews, providing contractors with greater control over labour costs and timelines.

Role of training in improving workforce readiness

Victaulic also emphasises the value of manufacturer-led training in mitigating labour risks.

The company’s training programmes aim to equip workers with the skills required to handle specialised products, such as couplings, sprinklers, and valves.

During training sessions, topics include pipe grooving, alarm valve servicing, and installation techniques, ensuring workers are well-prepared for site demands.

Victaulic suggests that having at least one certified team member on-site can enhance project reliability and support other team members.

Combining innovation with workforce development

Victaulic continues to invest in both product innovation and workforce development to help the construction sector navigate ongoing labour challenges.

The company states that its goal is to reduce time and costs associated with installations while ensuring proper training for end users.

By aligning product design with training standards, Victaulic aims to address workforce shortages and support contractors in delivering efficient, reliable systems.

Victaulic addresses labour shortages in UK and EU construction: summary

Victaulic has highlighted solutions to labour shortages in the UK and EU construction industries.

The company’s Installation-Ready products simplify installations, reducing errors and increasing efficiency, even for less experienced workers.

In addition to innovative product design, Victaulic offers training programmes to equip workers with the skills necessary to handle specialised systems.

These efforts aim to address the challenges posed by labour shortages while enhancing reliability and cost control for contractors.

RIBA calls for changes in construction safety and regulatory systems

by Building ManagementConstruction

Regulatory recommendations for enhancing building safety

On 16 January 2025, the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) released its further response to the Phase 2 report of the Grenfell Inquiry.

Building on its initial reaction on 4 September 2024, RIBA identified opportunities for regulatory reform.

It recommended exploring the establishment of a single statutory body, akin to the Engineering Council, to develop a competence system for construction professionals.

Other suggestions include revising the definition of higher-risk buildings to cover assembly spaces and temporary leisure establishments, requiring dual fire-fighting staircases in new residential buildings over 18 metres, and retrofitting single-staircase buildings of similar height with fire safety upgrades during material alterations.

RIBA also advocated for a review of Approved Document B and broader use of sprinklers in buildings with vulnerable occupants.

Structural reform for accountability and safety

RIBA proposed structural changes to improve accountability in fire safety.

It supported consolidating fire safety responsibilities under a single Secretary of State and appointing a suitably qualified Chief Construction Advisor.

The organisation also called for an organisational-level licensing scheme for principal contractors to enhance professional accountability.

These measures, RIBA stated, are vital to ensuring better coordination and safety in the construction sector.

Operational changes and independent research

To restore trust in construction product standards, RIBA urged the need for independent research and development into testing methods.

It also suggested making safety-critical guidance freely accessible and emphasised the role of contracts and procurement in clarifying the responsibilities of project teams.

A key operational recommendation was the introduction of Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for residents requiring them in all buildings over 11 metres in height.

These operational adjustments aim to strengthen safety protocols and rebuild public confidence in construction practices.

RIBA’s commitment to meaningful reform

Jack Pringle, RIBA Chair of Board, emphasised the need for industry-wide cultural and behavioural changes: “The full findings of the Inquiry’s report make a clear case for further regulatory, structural and operational change, alongside a fundamental shift in culture and behaviours – and we remain fully committed to playing our part.”

He highlighted RIBA’s ongoing efforts to improve training and education, including its mandatory Health and Safety test and Principal Designer Register, and its dedication to driving reforms to enhance public confidence in the built environment.

RIBA calls for changes in construction safety and regulatory systems: summary

RIBA has released further recommendations following the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report, urging changes in regulatory, structural, and operational practices.

Key suggestions include establishing a single statutory body for construction competence, revising high-risk building definitions, mandating fire-fighting staircases in residential buildings over 18 metres, and implementing broader sprinkler use.

The organisation also advocates for a unified fire safety authority under a Secretary of State and operational measures like PEEPs for vulnerable residents in buildings over 11 metres.

RIBA remains committed to supporting these changes to ensure a safer built environment.

CPD course launched by Bull Products

by Featured NewsPeople

Bull Products, a provider of temporary fire, safety and access control solutions for the construction industry and other applications, has announced the launch of its new Continuing Professional Development (CPD) training entitled ‘Construction Site Fire Safety’.

The presentation is designed to support professionals in the construction industry as they navigate the demands of a rapidly changing fire detection and alarm market.

Head of Sales at Bull Products, Carl Leeson’s statement

Carl Leeson, Head of Sales at Bull Products, commented on the launch of the new course, saying it: “Reflects our commitment to fostering lifelong learning. In today’s evolving fire detection and alarm industry, continuous education is essential to remain competitive.

“The CPD course offers participants enhanced knowledge on the latest regulations as well as product solutions, helping them grow within their roles and fulfil crucial professional obligations.”

Features of the course

With an emphasis on practical skills, innovation, and real-world applications, the CPD course is designed to provide attendees with valuable opportunities to stay ahead of emerging trends and best practices.

The course covers the types of wireless fire alarm systems available, wireless system differences, correct location and designs on site, Fire Risk Assessments, the importance of third-party approval and testing frequencies.

Those attending the course will learn how construction site safety, equipment and knowledge can be improved. This will be done by learning about the different systems that are available, where they can be used and the pros and cons of each type of system.

The course will also take a deeper look at the design of a fire detection and alarm system and explain why it is important to use approved fire detection and alarm installation companies to secure full coverage and protection.

Bull Products announce the launch of their new CPD course: Summary

Bull Products has announced the launch of their new Continuing Professional Development (CPD) training entitled ‘Construction Site Fire Safety’. This course has been designed to give attendees a greater understanding of the changing fire detection and alarm market.