Orestone Fire Protection’s Operations Director, Jack Bielby, discusses nationwide expansion, specialist retrofit systems and delivering compliance-led solutions for complex building projects
From offices to homes: Are England’s housing conversions creating fire safety risks?
Dozens of organisations have urged the UK government to abolish permitted development rights for office-to-residential conversions, citing the loss of affordable homes and concerns over fire safety.
Fire Aware CEO calls for cultural change in fire sector
Gavin Skelly, Chief Executive of Fire Aware, has urged a cultural shift in the fire sector to improve safety standards in the built environment.
New European cladding fire test standard to take effect in 2026
Introduction of revised European cladding testing standard
A revised European standard for cladding fire testing will come into force on 31 January 2026.
According to DBI – The Danish Institute of Fire and Security, the updated method replaces the existing system of visual fire test assessments with a temperature-based approach.
DBI explained that cladding products such as plasterboards and wooden panels must protect underlying materials during fire exposure.
The organisation said current testing relies on visual observation of whether underlying materials, such as particleboard, show signs of charring.
It added that this can lead to inconsistent results between laboratories.
Jeanne B. Kirk, Resistance to Fire Engineer at DBI, said: “It can be a bit subjective and cause variations from lab to lab. Disagreements often arise in borderline cases.”
Temperature-based pass or fail system
DBI confirmed that the new system will determine pass or fail based on measured temperatures.
The standard will use a threshold of whether recorded temperatures rise more than 270°C.
DBI has been directly involved in designing sensor placement for testing to ensure accurate assessment of whether underlying materials risk becoming charred.
Kirk said: “It’s about getting data sets that show how the material actually performs.
“If the temperature exceeds the limit, it automatically fails.
“This makes the conclusion much more objective.”
Adjustments to European classification system
DBI noted that cladding in Europe is classified with K1 10 and K2 30 standards, which indicate protection for 10 and 30 minutes.
It said the revision expands how these classes are documented to prevent products being approved for applications they are not suited for.
The organisation confirmed that the revised rules redefine application areas, ensuring results reflect intended use.
It added that three test substrates will now be used – expanded polystyrene (EPS), low-density materials such as insulation, and particleboard.
Kirk explained: “If you test on EPS, which is considered the worst-case scenario, you are allowed to install your cladding on anything.
“But if you test on insulation, you can only install it on similar low-density materials.
“In both cases, the installation method must be the same as in the test.”
Flexibility for manufacturers in testing
DBI stated that manufacturers will have clearer options under the new approach.
It gave the example of plasterboard producers, who previously needed separate tests for each substrate type.
DBI confirmed that a single test on EPS will now cover multiple substrate types including cellulose, seagrass, PIR, and PUR.
The organisation said this will simplify testing and reduce duplication.
It added that the revision introduces flexibility in fastening methods.
Kirk said: “A lot of people ask why they can’t just test it as a wall – because that’s how it’s actually installed in practice.
“Now this will be possible, but then of course it can only be used as wall cladding.”
She added: “If you test with nails, you will in the future be allowed to use screws in practice – something that was previously not possible without a separate test or an assessment in the European classification system.”
Incorporating bio-based materials
DBI explained that the revision makes it easier to use bio-based materials in construction.
It said the current system requires testing for each product and manufacturer individually.
Under the new method, switching between suppliers will be permitted if the materials are of the same type and have equivalent properties.
Kirk said: “As it stands, you can’t change anything – not thickness, not density, not manufacturer.
“Now we’ll have a standard method that allows switching within the same type.”
Timeline and industry preparation
DBI stated that the revised standard has been in development for seven years.
It confirmed the changes will take effect on 31 January 2026.
The institute recommended that manufacturers begin preparing test procedures now to ensure compliance.
Kirk said: “When you plan a fire test, it typically takes several months.
“So if you start now, you’ll be ready when the standard will come into effect.
“And you already know what you need to test for.”
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The new cladding fire test standard affects how materials are assessed for fire protection across Europe.
Fire engineers will need to understand the implications of moving from visual to temperature-based assessments.
Regulators and testing bodies will apply the revised classification system when approving cladding products.
Fire safety professionals involved in specification and inspection will need to consider the new substrate-based testing approach and documentation requirements.
New European cladding fire test standard to take effect in 2026: Summary
A revised European cladding fire test standard will come into force on 31 January 2026.
DBI – The Danish Institute of Fire and Security reported that the new system replaces visual assessments with a temperature-based method.
Pass or fail will be determined by whether recorded temperatures exceed 270°C.
DBI contributed to sensor placement design in the testing setup.
Cladding classifications K1 10 and K2 30 will have updated documentation rules.
Three new standard test substrates will be used – EPS, low-density insulation, and particleboard.
A single EPS test will apply to multiple substrate types.
Wall-mounted testing will be allowed if cladding is intended for vertical use.
Flexibility in fastening methods will be introduced.
Bio-based materials will be easier to incorporate under the revised standard.
Switching between suppliers of equivalent bio-based products will be permitted.
The standard has been in development for seven years.
It will take effect on 31 January 2026.
DBI advises manufacturers to begin testing preparations immediately.
Is Gen Z the missing piece in solving the UK construction skills gap?
Industry facing shortage of workers
PlanRadar has reported that the UK construction industry is confronting a major skills gap, with more than 140,000 vacancies unfilled.
The company said this shortage is compounded by the fact that many experienced workers are approaching retirement age.
It explained that the traditional method of meeting demand by simply recruiting more people will not be enough to address the issue.
According to PlanRadar, new strategies will be required to secure the future workforce and ensure industry growth.
Rob Norton, UK Director at PlanRadar, said: “The construction industry faces a fundamental challenge: a signification talent void, with over 140,000 vacancies.
“This issue is compounded by a workforce that’s rapidly approaching retirement.
“The old playbook of simply ‘finding more people’ is no longer sufficient; the real solution will require a different approach.”
Gen Z as a digital solution
PlanRadar stated that younger generations, especially Gen Z, will play a key role in addressing the skills gap.
The company commented that Gen Z is recognised as the most digitally fluent generation to date and has a strong preference for meaningful work.
It added that these qualities make them well suited to help drive digital transformation within the sector.
Norton said: “Gen Z, the most digitally fluent generation in history, holds the key.
“Their ease with technology and desire for purposeful work can drive the digital transformation our sector needs.
“It is our responsibility to show today’s students, especially those checking their newly published GCSE results, that construction is a place where their digital skills are valued.”
Importance of training existing staff
PlanRadar noted that upskilling the existing workforce is also a priority.
The company indicated that digital tools in construction are becoming increasingly accessible, with user interfaces comparable to widely used consumer apps.
It said that empowering older workers to adopt these tools can improve efficiency and collaboration across all age groups.
Norton added: “While this generation’s digital fluency is a huge asset, it’s also true that we need to upskill our entire workforce.
“The good news is that using modern, digital construction tools is often as simple as using apps we already know, like WhatsApp.
“It’s about empowering everyone to work more efficiently and collaboratively, regardless of age.”
Digital future of construction
PlanRadar explained that the sector’s long-term stability depends on adopting digital working methods.
It said this requires industry-wide cooperation to align recruitment, training, and operational practices with technological change.
The organisation stressed that preparing both current and future employees to work with digital tools is essential.
Norton said: “We must embrace change and welcome the next generation of builders.
“The future of construction is digital, and we need to work together to build it.”
Timing linked to GCSE results
PlanRadar connected this message with the release of GCSE results in the UK.
It explained that this moment is an opportunity to highlight career paths in construction to young people who are considering future options.
The organisation stated that showing students how digital skills are valued in construction can help attract new entrants to the industry.
It added that engaging with students at this stage will be important to reduce the impact of the skills gap.
Addressing skills gaps in passive fire protection: UK report outlines recommendations
Passive fire protection in the UK faces workforce, training, and awareness challenges
According to the final report published by the PFP Skills Group, the passive fire protection (PFP) sector in the United Kingdom is facing a series of structural issues related to workforce development, qualifications, and training consistency.
The report details findings from an extensive review of the sector and offers 14 recommendations to improve recruitment, upskilling, and professional standards.
The PFP Skills Group comprises over 60 organisations, including trade associations, employers, training providers, and government representatives.
The report was commissioned following concerns raised by industry professionals, regulators, and the Grenfell Tower Inquiry about the competency of individuals working in life-critical PFP roles.
The group’s work was supported by the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) and facilitated by the Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP).
Workforce shortages and recruitment barriers
A key issue highlighted in the report is the lack of new entrants into the PFP sector.
The group found that the workforce is ageing and often relies on informal routes into employment.
Few structured pathways exist for young people or career changers to enter the sector.
This has contributed to a shortage of qualified professionals, particularly in inspection and installation roles.
Employers report difficulties in finding suitably trained workers, and limited public understanding of PFP has affected recruitment.
The sector is also underrepresented in broader construction careers materials, reducing its visibility among school leavers and jobseekers.
The report recommends launching a campaign to raise awareness of PFP careers and creating more direct training and qualification routes.
It also suggests building closer links between industry and education providers to improve progression into the sector.
Training provision lacks standardisation
The report identifies inconsistencies in how PFP training is delivered and assessed.
While multiple training providers offer courses, there is no central oversight to ensure alignment with sector needs or national qualification frameworks.
Some courses lack clear quality benchmarks or are not formally accredited.
This creates confusion for employers and learners, and can result in competency gaps among workers.
The group calls for a clearer framework for PFP qualifications and urges training providers to align their content with industry-recognised standards.
Among the recommendations are the development of new apprenticeship standards and modular training pathways covering the full range of PFP disciplines.
The report also encourages the use of digital learning tools and remote access training to improve accessibility.
Competency and regulatory alignment
Concerns about the competency of those working in PFP were raised during the Grenfell Inquiry and remain a central issue for the sector.
The report outlines how the absence of defined competency criteria has led to variability in inspection, design, and installation quality.
The report recommends that government and industry collaborate to define competency criteria for all PFP roles, aligned with the UK’s wider building safety reforms and the new Building Safety Regulator’s requirements.
This would support the professionalisation of the sector and ensure a common baseline of knowledge and skills.
The group also highlights the need for improved guidance and technical documentation.
This includes the development of best practice materials to support on-site decision-making and reduce reliance on informal or anecdotal approaches.
Strategic coordination and governance
Throughout the report, the group identifies a lack of sector-wide coordination as a barrier to addressing skills issues.
Multiple organisations have responsibility for training, qualifications, and promotion, but there is no single body overseeing development across the UK.
To address this, the group proposes the establishment of a formal PFP Skills Group to oversee implementation of the report’s recommendations.
This would include representatives from trade bodies, employers, government, and training providers.
A central part of the group’s role would be to track progress against the 14 recommendations and ensure alignment with wider construction skills initiatives.
The report also suggests securing longer-term funding and engagement with devolved administrations to deliver consistency across the UK.
Summary of recommendations
The PFP Skills Final Report includes the following recommendations:
- Raise public and professional awareness of passive fire protection as a career.
- Improve pathways into the sector for school leavers and career changers.
- Establish a framework of qualifications and modular learning options.
- Expand and formalise apprenticeship standards in PFP disciplines.
- Align all training provision to agreed sector competencies.
- Develop digital training content to improve access and flexibility.
- Improve training materials and sector guidance on best practice.
- Establish and maintain a competency framework for PFP roles.
- Introduce clear job role definitions and expectations across the sector.
- Promote the uptake of third-party certification for training providers.
- Develop an accreditation system for qualifications and courses.
- Establish a new PFP Skills Group to oversee implementation.
- Secure sustained funding and industry support for skills development.
- Ensure policy alignment with wider construction and building safety reforms.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The construction skills gap has direct implications for fire and safety professionals, as workforce shortages may delay project timelines and compliance efforts.
Upskilling employees on digital tools can support more accurate tracking of fire safety requirements during construction.
Engaging younger workers could ensure that future fire safety standards are met consistently in a digital-first environment.
Industry-wide collaboration between construction and fire safety professionals will be necessary to strengthen compliance while addressing the workforce gap.
UK construction faces urgent skills gap challenge: Summary
PlanRadar reported that the UK construction industry has more than 140,000 vacancies.
It said many experienced workers are approaching retirement.
It explained that recruitment alone will not address the shortage.
PlanRadar stated that Gen Z’s digital fluency offers a solution.
It said younger workers want purposeful careers and are comfortable with technology.
It added that their skills can support digital transformation.
PlanRadar noted that existing staff must also be trained in digital tools.
It stated that these systems are comparable to apps like WhatsApp.
It explained that adoption can improve efficiency and collaboration.
The organisation said the industry must embrace digital change.
It linked the message to the release of GCSE results.
It said students should be shown that their skills are valued.
It explained that promoting digital careers could reduce the skills gap.
PlanRadar stated that collaboration will be needed to secure the future workforce.
It added that the future of construction is digital.
Bull Products to exhibit at UK Construction Week 2025
Bull Products confirms debut at Birmingham event
Bull Products has announced it will be exhibiting at UK Construction Week Birmingham for the first time.
According to Bull Products, the company will be at stand D112 from 30 September to 2 October 2025.
It said the stand will showcase safety systems designed for the construction sector and related applications.
The company added that its Fire 360° service will be a central focus, along with its SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+ alarm and detection systems.
Fire 360° service and carbon reduction focus
Bull Products reported that its Fire 360° service is designed as a complete compliance solution.
The company explained that the service covers design, installation, commissioning and maintenance across sites of different sizes in the UK.
It added that Fire 360° also includes asset collection, storage, cleaning and inspection, preparing equipment for reuse on future projects.
According to Bull Products, Fire 360° supports the Green Bull initiative by helping customers address carbon reduction requirements while maintaining site efficiency.
SITENET fire detection and alarm system
Bull Products stated that SITENET will be featured at the event as part of its system range.
The company explained that SITENET is a fully EN 54 certified wireless intelligent fire detection and alarm system.
It added that SITENET can link up to 511 devices from one panel across 32 zones.
The system uses radio devices and wireless mesh technology with network redundancy and channel hopping, the company said.
It reported that SITENET meets JCoP and HSG168 compliance requirements and can be used in both internal and external environments.
SITEPROTECT system applications
Bull Products confirmed that SITEPROTECT will also be on display.
The organisation stated that SITEPROTECT is a temporary wireless mesh fire detection and alarm system designed for the construction industry.
It explained that SITEPROTECT supports up to 480 devices across 15 zones using EN 54-5 and EN 54-7 certified detector heads.
The system also incorporates wireless emergency fire, first aid, intruder and lockdown alarms.
The company added that the lockdown alarm has been developed primarily for the education sector but can also be deployed in public settings such as shopping centres.
SITEEVAC+ system for cost-sensitive projects
Bull Products noted that SITEEVAC+ is the third system in its product line to be displayed at the exhibition.
The company explained that SITEEVAC+ is a wireless mesh fire detection and alarm system supporting up to 50 devices in 3 zones.
It said the system is intended for projects working within lower budgets while still requiring essential fire detection capability.
According to Bull Products, SITEEVAC+ is particularly suited to housebuilding and development sites.
It added that the system uses EN 54-5 and EN 54-7 certified detector heads.
Company statement on exhibition
Carl Leeson, Head of Sales at Bull Products, said: “We’re excited to be exhibiting at UK Construction Week Birmingham after the success of the London event in May.
“We invite attendees to visit us at stand D112 to discover how Bull Products has a cutting-edge solution for every application with SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+.”
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The exhibition of Bull Products at UK Construction Week provides sector professionals with an opportunity to assess compliance-focused fire detection and alarm systems designed for construction environments.
The presence of SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+ demonstrates the range of wireless mesh systems available across different project budgets and operational scales.
For safety managers, the integration of temporary and permanent detection systems into site operations is relevant to meeting regulatory standards such as JCoP and HSG168.
The addition of services such as Fire 360° also links fire safety provision with sustainability objectives, reflecting operational and compliance requirements within the sector.
Bull Products to exhibit at UK Construction Week 2025: Summary
Bull Products has announced its first appearance at UK Construction Week Birmingham.
The company will be at stand D112 from 30 September to 2 October 2025.
It will present its Fire 360° service and fire detection systems SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+.
Fire 360° includes design, installation, commissioning, maintenance, asset collection, cleaning and inspection.
The service supports the Green Bull initiative for carbon reduction.
SITENET is EN 54 certified and supports up to 511 devices across 32 zones.
It uses wireless mesh technology with network redundancy and channel hopping.
SITEPROTECT supports up to 480 devices in 15 zones and includes fire, first aid, intruder and lockdown alarms.
The SITEPROTECT lockdown system was developed for education and can be applied in public sites.
SITEEVAC+ supports up to 50 devices in 3 zones and is intended for cost-sensitive projects.
It uses EN 54-5 and EN 54-7 certified detector heads.
Carl Leeson, Head of Sales at Bull Products, confirmed the company’s invitation for attendees to visit the stand.
BS 8674 sets fire risk assessor competence standards in the UK
Publication of BS 8674 standard
The Fire Sector Confederation has reported that BS 8674:2025 has been published as a code of practice for the competence of fire risk assessors in the UK.
According to the Fire Sector Confederation, the British Standard provides a framework to evaluate competence for the first time across the profession.
It said the document was developed through industry collaboration, public consultation and alignment with BS 8670-1:2024.
The organisation noted that the code of practice defines the knowledge, skills, behaviours and experience expected at three levels: foundation, intermediate and advanced.
It added that the framework is intended to support assessors, regulators, professional bodies and duty holders by providing a consistent and transparent set of criteria.
Competence levels explained
The Fire Sector Confederation reported that the standard specifies progressive levels of practice.
It explained that the foundation level applies to those new to the profession or working on simple premises such as small offices or retail units.
The intermediate level is described as covering assessors with more experience who are responsible for medium complexity buildings, such as mid-rise residential blocks or public venues.
The advanced level is identified as being for highly experienced assessors working on complex or high-risk buildings, including hospitals, large public spaces and tall residential properties.
The organisation stated that the framework is designed to support both individual career development and wider professional regulation.
Government response to BS 8674
The Fire Sector Confederation reported that Building Safety Minister Alex Norris welcomed the publication.
Alex Norris said: “The introduction of this new standard marks a significant step forward in the collective effort to make buildings safer for residents.
“By improving safety and accountability, it helps ensure that a tragedy like Grenfell is never repeated, and it reflects a clear commitment to implementing the Inquiry’s recommendations.
“A clear and consistent benchmark for fire risk assessors will help to raise standards of competency across the profession and I’m grateful to the British Standards Institution and all committee members involved in making this happen.”
Links to wider UK reforms
The Fire Sector Confederation explained that the release of BS 8674 comes as the UK continues to implement changes from the Building Safety Act 2022, Fire Safety Act 2021 and Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022.
It stated that the government has indicated an intention to require independent, third-party certification of fire risk assessor competence.
It added that the new standard provides a framework that could support such future regulation.
The group noted that the standard reflects ongoing work to align professional practice with regulatory reforms introduced since the Grenfell Tower fire.
Industry collaboration and development
The Fire Sector Confederation stated that BS 8674 was shaped through a working group it led with regulators, government departments and industry stakeholders.
It reported that the initiative followed years of development aimed at strengthening standards in the profession.
The organisation explained that this work has been directed at building the competence, capability and capacity of fire risk assessors.
It added that the new framework provides an agreed reference point across the sector.
Dennis Davis, Competence Director at the Fire Sector Confederation, said: “The publication of BS 8674 is a significant achievement for the profession and a vital step towards building a safer future.
“It gives all stakeholders confidence that competence can now be clearly demonstrated against a professional framework capable of independent verification.”
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The publication of BS 8674 establishes a framework for assessing fire risk assessor competence, offering clarity for duty holders, regulators and professional bodies.
It supports assessors in understanding their career progression routes, from foundation through to advanced levels.
For organisations employing or contracting assessors, the framework provides a reference point to verify qualifications and experience against a nationally agreed standard.
The standard also connects to the government’s wider safety reforms, reinforcing the potential for regulation of competence in the future.
BS 8674 sets fire risk assessor competence standards in the UK: Summary
The Fire Sector Confederation reported that BS 8674:2025 has been published.
It sets out competence criteria for fire risk assessors in the UK.
The framework defines three levels of practice: foundation, intermediate and advanced.
The code of practice was developed through industry collaboration and consultation.
It aligns with BS 8670-1:2024.
The standard establishes criteria covering knowledge, skills, behaviours and experience.
Building Safety Minister Alex Norris welcomed the publication.
He said the standard supports accountability and the Inquiry’s recommendations.
The Fire Sector Confederation explained that the standard supports consistency, career development and regulation.
It stated that BS 8674 was developed with government, regulators and industry stakeholders.
Dennis Davis of the Fire Sector Confederation said it provides a framework for independent verification.
The government has indicated that independent certification of competence may be required.
The new standard reflects broader reforms including the Building Safety Act 2022.
It connects to changes from the Fire Safety Act 2021 and Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022.
The framework is intended to strengthen practice and raise standards.
It provides a benchmark for duty holders, regulators and professional bodies.
Walls that work under pressure: Why EN 13501-1 changes everything
Joe Ragdale, Technical Director at Wetherby Wall Systems, explores how EN 13501-1 redefines external wall testing and what developers need to do now
BS 476, the UK’s long-standing fire testing standard, is being phased out, and by September 2029, it will no longer be recognised under building regulations.
On the surface, that might feel like a distant deadline, but the reality is that the transition has already begun.
Waiting too long to adapt can result in costly redesigns, project delays, or compliance issues that are far more challenging and expensive to resolve once construction is underway.
The transition to EN 13501-1 has already started
The switch to EN standards isn’t something that’s coming.
It’s already happening.
Since March 2025, BS 476 has started being gradually removed from Approved Document B, signalling a clear move towards EN 13501-1 as the new fire classification benchmark for external wall systems.
By 2029, EN 13501-1 will be the only accepted standard.
That means all external wall build-ups, including cladding, insulation, cavity barriers and fixings, will need to be tested and classified as a full system.
This is a major shift away from the old approach, where materials were tested separately using small-scale tests like BS 476 Parts 6 and 7.
This change is part of a broader effort to strengthen building safety regulations in response to fire safety concerns and ongoing remediation issues.
Since the Grenfell tragedy in 2017, regulatory bodies, industry professionals and government departments have been working to create a more robust, accountable framework that addresses the risks caused by complex wall systems, not just their individual components.
While BS 476 focused on how individual materials behaved in test conditions, EN 13501-1 looks at how everything performs together in a real fire.
What makes EN 13501-1 different?
EN 13501-1 focuses on how the full wall system performs, rather than just the individual materials.
It introduces Euroclass ratings such as A1 or A2-s1,d0, which take into account things like how easily something burns, how much smoke it gives off, and whether it produces flaming droplets.
All of these can make a big difference to how a fire spreads and how safe the building is for people inside.
But ticking off those ratings isn’t enough.
What really matters is how the full wall performs when everything is installed together.
That includes the insulation, cavity barriers, fixings, sheathing boards and final finish.
If one part of that system hasn’t been tested in combination with the others, it may not meet the requirements.
In other words, using A2-rated insulation on its own isn’t enough.
If that insulation hasn’t been tested as part of a complete wall system, it won’t be considered compliant under EN 13501-1.
Why system-level testing matters
Fire doesn’t move in straight lines or follow neat paths.
It spreads in unpredictable ways, and the way materials interact can make a big difference to how a fire develops.
That’s why testing materials separately only tells part of the story.
Just because every product in a wall passes testing on its own, that doesn’t mean the finished wall will perform safely.
A cladding panel and insulation board might both be A2-rated, but without being tested together, with the right barriers and fixings, there’s no way to guarantee they’ll be safe when installed on a building.
That’s where EN 13501-1 comes in.
It requires large-scale testing, typically using BS 8414, to see how fire behaves across a full wall system.
For internal walls and floors, tests like BS EN 1364-1 and 1365-1 are used to assess how well fire is contained within the building.
Joe Ragdale, Technical Director at Wetherby Wall Systems, works with developers across the UK to design fire-safe façades.
He says: “We’re seeing a major shift. It’s not enough to know your materials are rated A2.
“You need to show how the whole system behaves when it’s built.
“That’s the level of detail the new rules demand.”
System-level testing also gives designers and contractors a clearer picture of risk.
Something as simple as the wrong cavity barrier or an off-spec fixing can create a weak point that allows fire to spread.
These are the kinds of issues that wouldn’t show up in small-scale tests.
It also helps to spot inconsistencies in installation that could compromise safety, which is why choosing well-supported systems with full technical guidance is key.
The cost of falling behind
Even though the new standards are already in motion, many buildings are still behind.
As of early 2025, only 46% of high-rise buildings that applied to the Building Safety Fund for non-ACM cladding work had completed the job.
That’s despite the fact that the industry has known this change was coming for a while.
Some developers are still working off outdated assumptions, relying on material-only assessments and thinking they’ll still be allowed a few years from now.
But once BS 476 is fully removed, these systems will no longer be recognised.
That could lead to massive costs.
The total bill for cladding remediation has already passed £16 billion, and government schemes like the Cladding Safety Scheme are now pushing more of the financial responsibility onto the original developers and contractors.
If your design isn’t compliant now, you could end up having to pay for it later.
It’s also worth noting that delays due to non-compliance can hold up planning approval, stop a project mid-build, or trigger retrospective rebuilds, all of which come with a serious price tag.
And if your product or system choice later turns out to fall short, you may not be able to rely on previous approvals as a defence.
Accountability is rising too
On top of the technical changes, the legal framework is tightening as well.
The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced new rules that make Principal Designers, Contractors and other key parties more accountable for safety decisions.
One of the biggest changes is the 30-year retrospective liability period.
That means if something goes wrong years down the line, those involved in the original design and construction could still be held responsible.
There’s also the new requirement for a digital record of safety decisions, known as the “golden thread”.
This includes everything from fire testing data and installation notes to product specifications and maintenance guidance.
Without it, proving compliance will be a lot harder if questions arise in the future.
What developers should be doing now
If you haven’t started preparing for EN 13501-1 yet, now is the time to get moving.
Leaving it until the last minute could result in delays, cost increases and limited access to testing facilities and qualified help.
Start by making sure the external wall systems you specify have been tested as full assemblies.
Look for systems that already meet A1 or A2-s1,d0 ratings, with test evidence covering the insulation, cavity barriers, cladding, fixings and other components all working together.
Make sure you’re working with manufacturers and suppliers who can provide full documentation, including test reports, classification certificates and detailed installation guidance.
This is what will protect your project and your reputation if it’s ever called into question.
As Ragdale says: “This isn’t just a box-ticking exercise.
“It’s about building something that stands up to scrutiny, now and in the future.
“Getting it right today protects your project, your reputation and your business.”
It’s also worth reviewing your internal processes.
Are your design teams fully up to speed with the latest test standards? Is there a clear process for documenting system selection, supplier evidence, and on-site installation details?
Building these habits now will help future-proof your work.
This was originally published in the August 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.
New UK guide challenges how the construction industry chooses its products
Industry bodies collaborate on new construction product safety guide
The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has released a new publication providing advice on the safe use of construction products in the UK.
According to CIOB, the Guide to Products Critical to Safe Construction has been developed with support from the Construction Products Association (CPA), the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI), the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA).
The guide is aimed at designers, specifiers and installers and sets out how to determine whether a product is critical to safe construction.
CIOB stated that the guide includes examples and case studies that reference existing industry standards, including the Code for Construction Product Information.
The publication is available free of charge in electronic format.
Background from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry
CIOB explained that the Grenfell Tower Inquiry identified failings in the UK’s construction product regulatory regime.
It said that the Inquiry found that the system did not ensure that products used in buildings were safe when used alone or as part of a wider system.
The organisation noted that the Inquiry’s findings were followed by further reports, including Building a Safer Future: Final Report and the Independent Review of Product Testing and Certification (the Morrell-Day Review).
According to CIOB, these reports recommended stronger regulation of manufacturing, testing and product supply.
It added that the UK Government published the Construction Product Reform Green Paper in February 2025, setting out proposals for a system that ensures safe products are safely used.
CIOB statement on the new guide
Paul Nash, Chair of CIOB’s Quality Implementation Group, said: “The outcomes of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry exposed a construction product regulatory regime that was failing to ensure that the products used in buildings, whether separately or part of a system, were safe.”
“In February 2025, the government published a Construction Product Reform Green Paper that sets out its proposals to deliver a system that guarantees safe products, safely used.
“It is against this backdrop that the CIOB, together with other professional bodies, has developed this Guide to Products Critical to Safe Construction to ensure the buildings we create, and the products we use in those buildings, are safe for those who use them, now and in the future.”
Guidance content and intended use
According to CIOB, the guide is intended to help industry professionals make informed product selection decisions.
It said the publication contains examples and case studies showing best practice in the assessment and selection of construction products.
The organisation explained that the guidance can be applied to products that are safety-critical whether they are used individually or as part of a system.
It added that the material is relevant across multiple building types and project scales.
CIOB stated that the guidance has been authored by Lorna Hagan, Civil Engineer and Chartered Quality Practitioner for Construct Tuition, and Chris Miles, Lead Assessor for the Code for Construction Product Information.
Comments from collaborating organisations
Chief Executive for CCPI, Amanda Long, said: “Whilst the guide has been developed against the backdrop of an emerging regulatory regime for construction products, its purpose is to support industry to act now to help to ensure that buildings are safe for those who use them, now and in the future.”
Duncan Johnson, Deputy Director, Construction Products Regulation, Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), added: “I welcome the collaborative efforts behind this guide, which brings together expertise from across the built environment sector to support safe and compliant construction, underpinned by clarity and consistency in product information.
“This guide contributes to raising standards and improving safety across the construction industry.”
Availability and access
CIOB confirmed that the guide is only available electronically.
It said that the digital format ensures accessibility for a wide range of users.
The organisation added that the free availability of the guide is intended to support adoption across the construction sector.
It stated that the resource can be accessed via CIOB and partner organisation websites.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The guidance addresses the safety of construction products, which directly impacts the fire safety performance of buildings.
It sets out methods for identifying products that are critical to safety, including those used in fire protection systems.
The publication aligns with wider regulatory changes following the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, which included fire safety considerations in its recommendations.
Fire safety professionals may use the guide to support compliance assessments, specification processes and procurement decisions.
CIOB publishes UK guide to products critical to safe construction: Summary
The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has released the Guide to Products Critical to Safe Construction.
The guide was developed in collaboration with the Construction Products Association (CPA), the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI), the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA).
The publication aims to help designers, specifiers and installers identify safety-critical construction products.
It includes examples and case studies showing industry best practice.
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry identified failings in the UK’s construction product regulatory regime.
Further reports, including the Morrell-Day Review, recommended stronger regulation.
The UK Government published the Construction Product Reform Green Paper in February 2025.
Paul Nash of CIOB said the guide supports the creation of safe buildings.
Amanda Long of CCPI and Duncan Johnson of OPSS welcomed the guide.
The resource is free and available electronically.
UK government outlines approach to Grenfell Tower deconstruction
How Grenfell Tower will be taken down
The UK government has announced that the step-by-step removal of Grenfell Tower will begin from the top of the building, carried out in a way described as sensitive and trauma-informed.
According to HM Government, each floor of the tower is expected to take approximately one month to remove, with the process involving both internal dismantling and external crane operations.
Large sections such as external columns will be removed in covered containers by crane, while smaller components will be taken down from inside the building.
The entire deconstruction will be conducted behind the white external wrapping that currently encloses the structure.
Officials said the decision to proceed with the removal follows long-term engagement with bereaved families, survivors, and the local community, and is being managed to minimise disruption to those living or working nearby.
Preparatory work and site changes during summer 2025
Preparations for the removal of Grenfell Tower include structural modifications and the installation of heavy machinery.
HM Government confirmed that a crane will be installed on the east side of the tower to assist with the removal of materials, which will be loaded into covered lorries and transported away from the site.
Scaffolding will be altered to accommodate the deconstruction process, including the addition of a second scaffold platform.
Work is also underway to install framing for a second banner bearing the green heart design.
Officials stated that both banners will be visible for a short period while the top banner is moved progressively down the building in line with the work.
Illumination options are being explored to maintain the tower’s visibility on the skyline during and after the works.
Storage, removal and memorial of tower materials
All materials removed from the building will be handled with care and discretion, with the aim of preserving their significance for the bereaved and survivor community.
The UK government said it will offer selected elements of the building for potential inclusion in a future memorial, working with the independent Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission and local stakeholders.
These preserved components will include the architectural crown and other elements agreed upon by the community.
Everything removed from the site will be transported using unmarked and covered lorries, according to the update.
HM Government said it is consulting with families and faith leaders about a separate second site in North Kensington, where the remaining materials may be laid to rest.
Health, safety and regulation of the site
The government said the deconstruction will follow safety protocols intended to reduce noise and disruption.
The process is subject to oversight from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which maintains enforcement authority and has carried out site visits since 2017.
HSE’s role includes inspections under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations, with the power to issue improvement or prohibition notices.
HM Government said it will continue to monitor the structure using a 24/7 system and floor-by-floor inspections by structural engineers.
It is also working with local partners and the UK Health Security Agency to support public health measures.
Contractor appointment and community access
Deconstruct UK (DUK) has been appointed as the principal contractor responsible for the deconstruction.
HM Government stated that DUK has maintained and monitored the Grenfell Tower site since 2017 and holds certifications from the British Standards Institute and other safety schemes.
The decision to assign the project to DUK was based on its familiarity with the site and its ongoing relationship with the local community, according to the government.
Bereaved families and residents are being invited to regular meetings with officials and DUK representatives to discuss project timelines and ask questions.
The government said the public can contact the site management team directly to arrange individual or group discussions.
UK government outlines approach to Grenfell Tower deconstruction: Summary
The UK government has confirmed that Grenfell Tower will be taken down floor by floor.
Each floor will take around one month to remove.
All work will be done behind the existing white external wrapping.
Smaller parts of the structure will be dismantled internally.
Larger structural components will be removed by crane.
A crane will be installed on the east side of the site.
Scaffolding will be adjusted to support the removal process.
Two banners bearing the green heart design will be displayed temporarily.
Removed materials will be covered and taken away in unmarked lorries.
Selected elements will be preserved for inclusion in a future memorial.
The government is consulting on a separate site for laying materials to rest.
The Health and Safety Executive will monitor and regulate the works.
Deconstruct UK will carry out the removal.
The contractor has worked on the Grenfell site since 2017.
Meetings are being held with families and residents for updates and questions.
Health and wellbeing services remain available to the community.