NFCC backs UK road safety plans and calls for stronger prevention role

UK strategy aims to cut road casualties

The UK Government has published a Road Safety Strategy today, setting out plans intended to reduce deaths and serious injuries on UK roads.

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) responded through its Road Safety Lead, Dan Quin.

Quin described the strategy as an important step and said progress on road safety has slowed over the past decade.

NFCC highlights measures for young drivers

Quin welcomed measures focused on young driver safety.

He pointed to a consultation on a minimum learning period as part of the strategy.

He said the NFCC would like to see stronger protections for vulnerable road users.

NFCC backs new investigation branch

Quin said the NFCC has supported calls for a new Road Safety Investigation Branch.

He welcomed the announcement that the branch will be established.

He also welcomed the adoption of a Safe System approach.

Quin said this approach focuses on road design so that human mistakes do not result in death or serious injury.

Fire and rescue role and resourcing

Quin said there is scope to go further to make roads safer.

He said fire and rescue services already play a role in road safety.

He cited more than 32,000 road traffic collisions attended by fire and rescue services in England last year.

He said this was a 17% increase over the past five years.

He said statutory responsibilities for fire and rescue services focus on preparing for and responding to collisions.

Quin said the NFCC wants the Government to consult on expanding those duties to reflect prevention activity such as education campaigns and programmes aimed at safer road use.

He said road safety commitments should be backed by investment in prevention and emergency response capabilities.

NFCC statement in full

Dan Quin, National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) Road Safety Lead, said: “NFCC strongly welcomes the announcement of a new road safety strategy, which is a crucial step towards reducing deaths and serious injuries on our roads.

“NFCC and organisations across the road safety sector have long warned that progress on road safety has dragged across the last decade and we are encouraged to see the Government recognising this and taking meaningful action.

“We particularly welcome the introduction of measures that strengthen young driver safety, including a consultation on a minimum learning period, although we would like to see the Government introduce greater protections for these vulnerable road users.

“NFCC has supported calls for the establishment of a new Road Safety Investigation Branch to bolster prevention strategies, and we are pleased to see this come to fruition today.

“It is also welcome to see the adoption of the Safe System approach, which is essential for a road network designed so that inevitable human mistakes do not result in death or serious injury.

“Embedding these principles is critical to a truly comprehensive and sustainable road safety framework.

“Whilst this strategy marks important progress, there remains scope to go much further to make our roads safer.

“Fire and rescue services already play a vital role in road safety, responding to over 32,000 road traffic collisions in England alone last year – a 17% increase over the past five years.

“Yet their statutory responsibilities remain limited to preparing for and responding to collisions.

“NFCC is calling on the Government to consult on expanding these duties to reflect the wide-ranging prevention activities fire and rescue services deliver, such as education campaigns and programmes that help people become safer road users.

“Crucially, the Government must ensure its commitment to road safety is backed by the necessary investment in prevention and emergency response capabilities.

“Fire and rescue services stand ready to fulfil their critical role in reducing harm and saving lives.

“With the right support, we can make an even greater impact.”

Swiss bar fire investigation finds no safety inspections for five years

An investigation into the Swiss bar fire has found that no safety inspections were carried out at the venue for five years prior to the deadly incident, which broke out on NewYear’s day and killed more than 40 people.

Nicolas Féraud, the mayor of the Swiss municipality of Crans-Montana, confirmed that Le Constellation bar had not undergone any safety inspections between 2020 and 2025.

Authorities said the blaze may have been caused by sparkler candles attached to champagne bottles coming into contact with the venue’s sound-proof ceiling, raising concerns about fire safety compliance.

Speaking at a press conference, Féraud said the last full inspection of the bar took place in 2019, following an earlier review in 2018 after the merger of neighbouring municipalities Chermignon, Montana, Randogne and Mollens into the newly formed Crans-Montana authority.

The 2018 inspection resulted in the installation of a panic handle on the main entrance door, while inspectors reported no issues with the acoustic lining.

A follow-up inspection on May 13, 2019, confirmed the correction of the door handle and again raised no concerns regarding sound-proofing materials.

Both inspection reports set the venue’s maximum capacity at 100 people in the basement and 100 on the ground floor.

Courts to determine responsibility for Swiss bar fire

The inspection carried out in mid-2019 was the last before the fatal incident last week. Féraud said the failure to carry out inspections in the following years was unexplainable.

Speaking during a press conference, he said the Municipal Council had only become aware of the gap between inspections when “consulting the documents submitted to the Public Prosecutor this weekend.”

“We bitterly regret this,” Féraud said, adding that “the courts will determine the influence such a failure had in the chain of causality that led to the tragedy.”

MSA brings remote fixed gas and flame detection notifications to EMEA

MSA launches EMEA access to fixed gas and flame detection live data

MSA Safety has launched its Remote Monitoring and Notifications solution for Fixed Gas and Flame Detection in EMEA, combining MSA Grid and FieldServer gateways to provide live data access and notifications.

MSA Safety said: “We’d like to share that our Remote Monitoring and Notifications solution for Fixed Gas and Flame Detection is now available in EMEA.

“Many industrial facilities operate continuously, and staying connected to safety systems can help teams act promptly when issues arise.

“With the combination of MSA Grid and FieldServer gateways, this solution provides access to live data and notifications from gas and flame detection devices.”

The company said the solution is designed to integrate into a range of environments and support monitoring at scale.

MSA Safety said it is intended to help users track equipment performance and safety events in real time.

Remote access via MSA Grid

MSA Safety said the FieldServer gateways are intended to keep users connected to fixed gas and flame detection devices when they are away from a facility.

The company said the same approach can support oversight of unmanned facilities.

MSA Safety described its Equipment Remote Monitoring and Notifications solutions as designed to integrate into many environments and provide scalable insight across equipment and processes.

The company said users can access customised insight or more detailed telemetry and data across a single facility or process, or across a wide geography.

MSA Safety said each fixed gas and flame detection FieldServer is pre-configured with its fixed gas and flame detection products before delivery to enable cloud communications to one or many MSA products.

Supported detectors and control equipment

MSA Safety said the pre-configured FieldServer can enable cloud communications for gas and flame detectors including the General Monitors S5000, Observer i and Senscient ELDS.

The company said the same set-up supports IR5500, FL5000, FL4000H and FL500 or FL500-H2.

MSA Safety said the Ultima X5000 can connect via 4-20mA, with 4-20mA available only in a NEMA 4 enclosure.

For controllers and monitors, the company said the list includes SENTRY io, SupremaTouch, 9010 or 9020 SIL and GasGard XL.

MSA Safety said the FieldServer also supports Chillgard 5000 and Chillgard 5000 Ammonia.

The company said the fixed gas and flame detection FieldServer can also be configured to support third-party equipment with native Modbus or BACnet connectivity.

MSA Safety said hazardous gas applications require an additional approved enclosure where the FieldServer is planned for that use.

Cybersecurity and compliance features

MSA Safety said Grid FieldServer Manager provides secure remote connectivity with fixed gas and flame detection FieldServers so users can configure, update and support connected industrial devices.

The company said connected devices can also be integrated with business applications and other cloud-based services.

MSA Safety said users can remotely access and monitor fixed gas and flame detection FieldServers via Grid FieldVEU and display up to 15 data points per device.

On security controls, the company said FieldSafe is a feature set added to every FieldServer gateway, covering local hardware and the MSA Grid FieldServer Manager application.

MSA Safety said gateway to internet browser and gateway to MSA Grid connections are secured with HTTPS using TLS or SSL.

The company said it has partnered with Amazon Web Services for MSA Grid, citing security features available through AWS.

MSA Safety said all FieldServer devices are designed to be compliant with California State Bill 327.

The company said FieldSafe includes three security levels and user profiles, and that its FieldServer gateways and MSA Grid have passed third-party security penetration testing.

London Fire Brigade Commissioner sets 2026 priorities in New Year message

London Fire Brigade details 2026 plans for London buildings and evacuation strategies

London Fire Brigade Commissioner Jonathan Smith has issued a New Year message setting out operational priorities for 2026, published on 01/01/2026.

Smith’s statement reflects on events during 2025, outlines current risk areas and describes planned work through 2026.

He also marked 2026 as the 160th year since the Brigade was founded.

Fatalities recalled after Bicester fire

Smith referenced the deaths of London Fire Brigade Leading Firefighter Martyn Sadler, firefighter Jennie Logan and member of the public Dave Chester at a warehouse fire in Bicester, Oxfordshire.

He said the Brigade’s thoughts remained with their families and friends.

Jonathan Smith, London Fire Brigade Commissioner, said: “As we enter the new year, I’d like to thank our firefighters, control officers and staff for their service, working hard to keep London safe every day, particularly those who have worked throughout the Christmas period taking time away from their families.

“The UK Fire and Rescue Service had a challenging year in 2025, as we experienced the tragic loss of our London Fire Brigade colleague Leading Firefighter Martyn Sadler, alongside fellow firefighter Jennie Logan, and member of the public, Dave Chester, at a warehouse fire in Bicester, Oxfordshire.

“Our thoughts remain with their families and friends.”

Terror threat training and civil defence role

Smith said the Brigade completed the rollout of its Marauding Terrorist Attack response capability early in 2025.

He described the training as enabling the Brigade to deploy rescue capability alongside police and ambulance service partners in high threat incidents.

Smith said the message referenced an attack at a synagogue in Manchester and other international incidents as reminders to be prepared for similar threats in London.

Wildfires, specialist vehicles and land management

Smith said the Brigade experienced the highest number of wildfires since the extreme heatwaves of 2022 during summer 2025.

He said a trial of four Wildfire Vehicles showed the benefit specialist vehicles can make when responding across outer London.

Smith said the Brigade has now purchased those vehicles.

He said the Brigade will keep exploring new vehicles, equipment and tactics ahead of summer 2026.

He also said the Brigade would continue working with local authorities across the capital on firebreaks and land management practices intended to reduce wildfire impact.

Lithium battery risk and built environment concerns

Smith said lithium batteries remained one of the fastest growing fire risks in London.

He said the Brigade has worked with the Government and advised on regulation of unsafe, poor quality or non-compliant lithium battery products sold on online marketplaces.

Smith said work in 2026 would include the Brigade’s #ChargeSafe campaign and efforts to identify risks posed by new and emerging technologies.

He also said more than 1,500 buildings in London still had a changed evacuation strategy due to fire safety concerns.

Grenfell recommendations and service improvements

Smith said the Brigade would remain focused during 2026 on improving and delivering a service fit for purpose for a modern global city.

He said this would include making improvements identified in recommendations from Phase 2 of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry targeted at both London Fire Brigade and fire and rescue services more widely.

NFPA warns home fires risk rises as Christmas trees stay up into January

January spike cited in home fires

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has urged US households to remove Christmas trees promptly after the holiday season, citing data showing that 35% of Christmas tree home fires happen in January.

The organisation said the risk increases the longer a tree remains indoors because it dries out and becomes more flammable over time.

Lorraine Carli, Vice President of Outreach and Advocacy at the National Fire Protection Association, said: “As much as we all enjoy the look and feel of Christmas trees in our homes, they’re large combustible items that have the potential to result in serious fires.

“The longer they’re in the home, the more of a risk they present.”

Why Christmas tree fires can be severe

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) said home fires involving Christmas trees are relatively uncommon but are more likely to be serious when they occur.

The organisation linked that severity to how quickly a dried-out tree can burn compared with a well-watered tree.

Carli said: “Fires that begin with Christmas trees represent a very small but notable part of the U.S. fire problem, considering that they are generally in use for a short time each year,”

Five-year averages and property losses

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) said that between 2020 and 2024 there was an estimated annual average of 143 home structure fires that began with Christmas trees.

The organisation said those fires resulted in seven civilian deaths and 13 civilian injuries.

The NFPA put direct property damage from these incidents at $15 million per year on average across the same period.

Disposal and packing guidance for decorations

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) advised using local community recycling programmes to dispose of Christmas trees where available.

The organisation said trees should not be kept in a garage or left outside.

The NFPA said people should unplug electrical decorations by gripping the plug, because pulling the cord can damage the wire and insulation.

The organisation advised inspecting light strings as they are packed away and discarding any sets with loose connections, broken sockets or cracked or bare wires.

The NFPA said sets of lights can be wrapped and stored in individual plastic bags or around cardboard.

The organisation advised storing electrical decorations in a dry place away from children and pets where they will not be damaged by water or dampness.

Desu Systems outlines 2026 priorities after 20th anniversary milestone

Desu Systems plans price changes and more site visits

Desu Systems BV has published a 2025 reflections and 2026 outlook update, written by Founder and CEO Ronald Verkroost and Managing Director Emile Hippe.

The company said 2025 marked 20 years since Desu was founded.

Verkroost and Hippe said the anniversary prompted a review of progress and priorities heading into 2026.

Desu Systems reorganises into four divisions

According to Desu Systems, it introduced structural changes during 2025 intended to improve how it supports clients.

The company said it is now organised into four divisions covering Flame & Gas Detection, OGI & Methane Emission Monitoring, Kitchen Fire & Hygiene Solutions and Special Products.

Desu Systems said each division is led by teams focused on specific industries and operating environments.

It added that the goal is to provide more relevant expertise and a smoother experience from first contact through long-term support.

Staffing and in-person support plans

Desu Systems said it plans to increase travel capacity in 2026 so its teams can spend more time on site with clients.

The company said this is intended to support in-person engagement when needed, across different locations.

It also said it welcomed new colleagues during 2025, naming Yifat, Arend, Vivienne, Liza, Sven and Jeffrey.

Desu Systems added that 2025 was the first year with Emile Hippe in the Managing Director role.

Product development and events attended

Desu Systems said it launched the SharpEye 20/20Q flame detector during 2025, positioning it as designed for rapid detection in complex industrial settings.

The company said it also completed early-stage development of the K-Star automatic degreasing system, which it described as focused on kitchen hygiene and fire safety.

Desu Systems said the K-Star system is expected to launch in mid-2026.

It added that it improved stock levels, expanded certifications and streamlined support processes during the year.

The company said it attended LNGcon, StocExpo, Host Milano and the Fire Safety Event as part of its 2025 engagement programme.

2026 participation and pricing changes

Desu Systems said it plans to participate in Intersec, the Fire Safety Event and Interschutz in 2026.

It described these events as opportunities for face-to-face meetings to discuss challenges, opportunities and partnerships.

The company said it will implement price adjustments on select product lines early in 2026, citing increased supplier costs including raw materials, compliance and shipping.

Desu Systems said account managers will support customers with updated pricing, lead times and forward planning for 2026 projects.

National Fire Chiefs Council home safety call targets festive fire deaths

NFCC issues new home safety stance

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has published a Home Safety Position Statement on Friday 19 December 2025, calling for ongoing government support for prevention activity aimed at reducing deaths and serious injuries from fires in the home.

The organisation said the UK’s fire and rescue services need long-term investment in advice, education and public awareness work to reduce preventable harm.

NFCC linked the call to this week’s Local Government Finance Settlement, arguing that prevention and education work must be properly supported.

England figures show festive risk

NFCC cited government data showing 250,000 accidental dwelling fires in England over the past decade.

The same data shows 1,804 deaths and 44,806 injuries from accidental dwelling fires in England over that period.

NFCC said the risk of fire is higher in December than in an average month of the year.

It added that Christmas Day is the day of the year when a fire is most likely to occur.

Data sharing and partnerships prioritised

NFCC said stronger prevention and more effective partnership working are needed to reach people most at risk.

The organisation said nearly one-third of people who die in fires are known to health or social care services.

It said information that could help prevent fires is often held across different organisations.

NFCC said lawful and effective data sharing between fire and rescue services, local authorities, the NHS and other partners would support earlier and more targeted intervention.

The organisation said it wants work on a household fire-risk model that links fire and health data to refine how home fire safety activity is targeted.

Chair calls for prevention in core funding

Phil Garrigan, NFCC Chair, said: “Fire and rescue services are doing more than ever to keep people safe in their homes.

“We see every day how a simple conversation or home visit can make the difference between life and death.

“The risks people face at home are changing, and prevention must keep pace – focusing on those most at risk, with the investment needed built into the core funding of the fire and rescue service.”

Home visits and education focus

NFCC described Home Fire Safety Visits as assessments carried out by fire and rescue service staff to identify risks in the home, install equipment such as smoke alarms and provide tailored advice.

The organisation said fire risks in the home are changing alongside increases in vulnerable populations, more care at home and the growing use of devices with lithium-ion batteries.

NFCC said it wants multi-year funding for home fire safety education to support national campaigns, school learning through StayWise and awareness work across housing, health and care sectors.

It also called for updates to national fire and rescue frameworks so that person-centred Home Fire Safety Visits are recognised as a tool for consistent advice, with reference to NFCC’s Person-Centred Framework Guidance.

NFCC said local authorities also need funding and capacity to inspect and enforce smoke, heat and carbon monoxide alarm regulations in private and social rentals.

Cost savings cited for visits

NFCC cited University of Liverpool research stating that every £1 invested in Home Fire Safety Visits generates £2.75 in savings through reduced fire, health and social care costs.

The organisation said the visits can also provide early intervention and safeguarding opportunities that reduce demand on other public services.

Public safety reminders for winter

NFCC said working smoke alarms and clear escape routes remain key precautions for reducing harm from fires in the home.

It encouraged extra care with electrical items, including avoiding overloaded sockets, unplugging lights and chargers overnight and choosing products that meet UK safety standards.

NFCC said candles, heaters and decorations should be kept away from flammable materials such as curtains or furnishings.

It added that members of the public can complete its free Online Home Fire Safety Check (OHFSC) for tailored advice.

What the position statement changes for prevention work

The statement sets out NFCC’s case for building person-centred Home Fire Safety Visits into national fire and rescue frameworks, alongside multi-year funding for education and public awareness work.

Fire and rescue chiefs and senior officers may use the document when discussing prevention resourcing after the Local Government Finance Settlement.

Local authority leaders and housing teams are referenced through NFCC’s call for funding and capacity to inspect and enforce smoke, heat and carbon monoxide alarm regulations in private and social rentals.

Fire and rescue services working with health and social care partners may also use NFCC’s focus on lawful data sharing and a household fire-risk model linking fire and health data to shape how risk is identified and referrals are handled.

The blackout scenario: Kappetijn Safety Specialists on 72 hours without power

Kappetijn Safety Specialists outline why prolonged blackouts are no longer a remote risk and how 72 hours without power could paralyse operations, safety and continuity

It is not the potential occurrence of a regional blackout that should raise the greatest concern, but rather the often-limited awareness and preparedness of companies for such an event.

A total and prolonged power outage directly impacts a company’s core interests: its brand reputation, product quality, the safety of personnel and the environment, integration within supply chains, the ability to support neighbouring communities and the financial costs of disrupted operations.

The continuity of operations is abruptly and indefinitely disrupted. All the more reason to clearly define the phases of such a scenario and focus on the planning, equipment and knowledge needed to respond effectively.

How do we safely shut down operations while minimising product loss and damage to installations? At what minimal ‘pilot light’ level can we keep critical processes running? And how do we prepare for a fast and efficient restart?

A blackout scenario has a significant impact on both the site and its personnel. Imagine an entire industrial facility shutting down – along with everything in a 50-kilometre radius. Total darkness. In the first few hours, only emergency power keeps essential systems running in parts of the region. Difficult to picture, perhaps, but not impossible to prepare for.

A blackout situation

Severe weather hits part of Western Europe. Electricity demand is high – too high. Wind, solar and battery sources fall short of supplementing conventional power plants. A large portion of the power grid collapses, including sections in the Netherlands. Much of the public infrastructure powered by electricity grinds to a halt. Transport systems and infrastructure support services fail. Cities come to a standstill.

Traffic lights, street lighting, access control systems and parking garages go dark. Homes lose power. Inside office buildings, lighting, climate control systems and elevators stop functioning. Healthcare institutions and hospitals must scale up their operations, yet their capabilities rapidly diminish. Facilities without emergency power are paralysed. For those with emergency generators, only the most essential functions continue – while the clock starts ticking on fuel reserves.

Bad weather intensifies societal tension. Instability may tip into chaos and civil unrest. The demand for assistance quickly outpaces the capacity of police and emergency services. Employees try to contact their families, but communication networks have failed. There is no information on when power might return. Plans from the government stipulate that non-essential companies will be last to come back online.

Impact on a large industrial company

Now, imagine a company producing capital-intensive goods through complex manufacturing processes. Raw materials, production stages and end products are all high-valuable. The company is part of a tightly integrated supply chain – each link critical to the final product of its predecessor.

Chemical substances play a major role in both production and storage. When operations stop, intermediate products become unusable and unique installations may be damaged. The company is subject to strict GMP and legal standards for safety and continuity, requiring a high level of operational control. The sewer system is disrupted, fire safety systems shut down, overflow and emergency storage of chemical substances is uncontrolled.

Process control via IT is disrupted. Data from the last 24 hours is inaccessible. Several hundred employees work on site, operating in a continuous 24/7 shift system.

All operations run on electricity. In the event of a blackout, emergency power enables a phased shutdown and can support up to 20% of operations. A complete power failure essentially forces all processes to shut down. Emergency generators are primarily designed to power control systems, allowing for a safe and controlled shutdown.

Dilemmas and risks

What risks and dilemmas does a company face during a power outage? Is your organisation equipped with emergency power – and if so, what will remain operational (and more importantly, what won’t)? How long can those systems be sustained? What are the implications for your employees and contractors and how will communication be maintained?

Due to increased strain and instability on the power grid, as well as the growing frequency of extreme weather events, the likelihood of long-term power outages is rising. A large-scale blackout – even across the Netherlands – is no longer unthinkable. In fact, the probability of a widespread power failure across a broad geographic area is increasing significantly. Government already communicates to society to prepare for blackout that can take up to 72 hours and get water, food, battery-radio and dyno torch in stock.

For Seveso/COMAH-classified companies, the consequences of a power outage can be severe – disrupting operations and potentially compromising the safety of personnel, production assets, site infrastructure, the environment and neighbouring businesses. This makes robust risk management practices critical for companies working with hazardous substances.

By implementing the right safety protocols, ensuring reliable (and enduring) emergency power systems and regularly training crisis teams, organisations can significantly reduce the impact of power outages.

Key considerations

A sudden, rapid and potentially prolonged power failure falls into the category of “low probability, high impact” events – requiring proactive preparation through planning, provisioning and training. According to research institutions, it is not a matter of if, but when this scenario will occur.

Every organisation is unique, with its own products, processes, materials, workforce and safety and continuity strategies. However, certain elements are universally important for all businesses to consider in advance.

There are ten essential questions every continuity manager should be asking. Does the installed emergency power system provide sufficient capacity to maintain essential primary and supporting processes that cannot be interrupted without causing unacceptable damage? Is there a sufficient reserve of fuel for the emergency power system and are there secured agreements in place to replenish this supply within a few hours?

Are other strategic facilities also connected to emergency power, such as the security control room, crisis management centre, cafeteria and the emergency response/fire station? Can a minimum level of security – including cybersecurity – be maintained in the event of a total power outage, even with emergency power support?

Is there a plan in place to manage the inbound and outbound flow of personnel on-site without access to power? Has it been determined which critical roles must be staffed on-site to manage shut-down processes and uphold essential safety functions?

Have the strategic areas within the site been identified and is access to these areas guaranteed during a total power outage? Can communication within the site and with external stakeholders continue during a blackout?

Reality check and training

To ensure thoughtful and well-informed preparation for a long-term blackout scenario and its potential consequences, a dedicated blackout training is a highly effective tool.

Ideally conducted over the course of a full working day, this simulation immerses participants in real-time scenarios that expose the critical dilemmas organisations may face. Crisis team members begin their day with initial briefings that signal the onset of a metaphorical “tsunami” of challenges. As the day progresses, new layers of complexity and decisions are introduced.

The training is tailored to each specific organisation, drawing on existing plans and crisis procedures to reflect the specific risks relevant to the site. During the exercise, participants will engage in activating the crisis team and taking specific roles, using the crisis room, structuring internal meetings, supporting personnel, managing internal and external communication, executing a safe site shutdown and preparing for restart production processes.

This experience enables the crisis team to practice prioritisation, collaborate using the structured FADCM decision-making model and expand their situational awareness beyond the physical boundaries of the site. FADCM: get Facts, Analyse, Decide, Communicate & Monitor.

The result is a significant increase in awareness of what truly matters when preparing a facility for a worst-case scenario – and a stronger, more resilient organisation.

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

Rethinking joint systems: Siderise breaks down fire performance at the slab edge

Siderise explains the performance differences between one-part and two-part perimeter joint systems to help project teams assess the most robust option for curtain wall applications

Robust compartmentation, supported by an appropriate perimeter fire seal solution, is essential to the passive fire protection of glazed façade systems – and is legally mandated in many regions worldwide.

To prevent vertical fire spread, firestops installed at the slab edge extend the fire resistance of the compartment floor to the rear of the façade.

These solutions typically fall into two main types: one-part dry fit systems and two-part pack-and spray systems.

Two-part pack-and-spray systems

Traditional approaches to firestopping at the facade / floor slab interface require the installation to be carried out in two separate stages.

The first step involves manually compressing generic mineral wool safing insulation material (typically 25 and 33 % compression) before installing it within the movement gap at the perimeter construction joint.

The second step involves applying a wet compound such as mastic, spray ablative or fire-rated silicone over the top of the insulation to create a smoke- and weather-resistant seal once cured.

One-part dry-fit systems

These systems feature factory engineered pre-compressed stone wool Lamella insulation with foil facings applied to the cut surfaces of the fibres to retain the ‘built-in pre-compression’ firmly in place and assist with uniformity of product density.

Designed and tested to provide a robust fire and hot smoke seal in the perimeter void between the facade and compartment floor, without the need for a topical wet sealant, they are installed in a single-fix with further manual compression of 20% for a tight fit and to accommodate movement.

Unlike the wet seal of two-part systems, one-part dry-fit firestops can be ordered pre-cut to suit the cavity width and can be supplied as part of a complete system package from a single manufacturer with spandrel insulation, mullion and transom fire protection, plus ancillary components.

In addition, these parts are often tested together in multiple test scenarios, and third-party certified as an advanced perimeter fire containment system for a more holistic approach to passive fire protection in the spandrel zone.

Each of these approaches results in different characteristics when it comes to fire performance and resilience, installation accuracy and efficiency, and repeatability and inspection.

1. Firestop resilience, durability and fire performance

Non-combustible mineral wool firestops must be durable enough to maintain their form and fit, even when subjected to façade and floor slab movement caused by environmental loads.

The safing insulation component of two-part firestop systems typically comprises standard mineral wool insulation with horizontally oriented fibres, which run parallel to the floor slab when installed.

While this 90° or transverse alignment offers stability, continual exposure to building / façade movement makes the material more susceptible to degradation along its length, resulting in the fibre structure breaking down.

This means that the ability of the safing material to recover from repeated compression cycles in-service is reduced.

This can lead to the firestop no longer maintaining the compression fit, increasing the risk of a gap forming between the product and the facade over time.

Should this occur, the perimeter seal could fail prematurely, resulting in loss of compartmentation.

Furthermore, to ensure that two-part wet-seal systems comply with the criteria of any third-party approvals or listings published by the sealant manufacturer, the safing insulation product should always be the same as that used which was in the certified tested system.

Using substitution products risks undermining the specified fire resistance performance.

Meanwhile, one-part firestops with a stone wool Lamella composition, such as ours, comprise vertically oriented fibres that run perpendicular to the substrate when installed.

Products with a vertical fibre orientation are highly compressible and flexible laterally (across their width), which enables them to not only overcome challenges presented by curved and inclined facades, but accommodate the dynamic movement of the curtain wall or floor slab.

Due to the unique structure of Siderise Lamella firestops they are able to maintain their ability to recover throughout their design life, as demonstrated through extensive age and movement cycling testing.

This means that the seal is continuously maintained throughout the lifetime of the building and for the required fire resistance period in the event of a fire.

When exposed to fire, the foil facing is designed to delaminate from the stone wool Lamella core, allowing the built-in pre-compression to be released.

This enables the product to expand and maintain its compression fit and integrity, even under the greater thermal stresses caused by the fire load that leads to facade and floor slab deflection.

Both system types can be tested to UL 2079 for air leakage, determined as the L-rating, to simulate smoke movement through compartmentation in buildings.

Leakage testing can assist authorities in determining the suitability of firestopping systems for the protection of floor openings and smoke barriers for the purpose of restricting the movement of smoke in accordance with the NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 101 Life Safety Code.

The difference between two-part spray and pack systems and one part dry-fit systems is that the latter does not rely on a wet seal to provide an adequate L rating

2. Application conditions, consistency and installation efficiency

The wet seal compound in two-part systems is sensitive to moisture and temperature dependent during application and curing.

It must be applied in dry conditions and controlled environments – which can be a challenge during hot seasons or locations with frequent rainfall– otherwise adhesion, curing, design life and product integrity may be adversely affected.

In most cases, the maximum application temperature is typically limited to 104°F (40°C) as high heat can cause rapid skinning or premature curing, making tooling difficult and reducing adhesion.

Similarly, exposure to rain, running or standing water, or high humidity can lead to washout or uneven curing.

Storage conditions for wet seal firestop compounds are just as important as application conditions because they directly affect product performance and shelf life.

Most manufacturers typically require sealants to be stored between 40 and 80°F (5 and 25 °C), which in turn requires onsite air-conditioned storage facilities in regions prone to inclement weather.

Improper storage can reduce workability if the sealant has thickened, shorten open time and curing consistency, and compromise the fire rating performance due to chemical degradation.

Since wet sealants rely on direct contact with the substrate, surfaces must be clean, dry, and free of dust, grease, oil or other contaminants.

Dust or debris creates a barrier that can weaken bonding and lead to gaps or peeling over time, while contaminated surfaces can cause voids or uneven curing.

Furthermore, the wet-film thickness must be applied consistently to achieve the required dry-film thickness as thickness variation due to human error can risk compromising the slab edge fire seal.

Wet spray firestop systems require specialist equipment such as pumps, mixers and nozzles.

Transporting and setting up heavy spray rigs on high-rise sites can be time-consuming while tight slab edge zones often lack room for bulky equipment, especially when façade works are concurrent.

In addition to having to wait for the right application conditions, the ‘curing’ and overspray clean up time also needs to be accounted for in the project schedule.

The flashing used to close off the spandrel zone from sight cannot be installed until after the installation has been approved, which means site operatives cannot immediately proceed with adjacent works, thus potentially holding up the build program.

This installer-driven and weather dependent approach can make it challenging to achieve a replicable level of quality across whole buildings of multiple stories, creating bottlenecks, especially when inspections are required before concealment.

In contrast, one-part dry-fit firestops are not weather or temperature sensitive and do not require any specialist application equipment and surface preparation of the substrate.

There are no curing times, wet or dry-film thickness complications or complex compression calculations.

Their straightforward installation approach, including a standardised compression percentage, can streamline the installation process and help reduce the risk of human error.

They also provide greater freedom for the installer in areas where access to the firestop zone is difficult after the facade is installed.

Dry-fit firestops can also be installed before the facade (including from the soffit).

3. Ease of inspection

With two-part systems, once the compound is applied, verifying the correct dry-film thickness, adhesion, and safing orientation and compression becomes difficult without destructive testing or a two-stage inspection.

Alternatively, when dry-fit, one part firestops are installed, visual inspections are sufficient.

The wrinkling of the foil makes it very easy to confirm if they have been installed correctly without disturbing the installation.

Their dry-fit application also makes it easier to judge bracket locations and distances, and tight jointing to ensure a continuation of the fire performance around the perimeter.

This can not only help to ensure a safer building but also reduce additional costs and lost time associated with remedial works.

Transparent protection

While traditional two-part firestop systems have been widely used in US construction, they often present challenges related to long-term durability, installation complexity, and inspection consistency.

In contrast, one-part firestop systems that have been engineered and tested to meet key standards such as ASTM E2307 and ASTM E2874 offer a reliable alternative.

By delivering uniform compression, accommodating façade movement, and enabling straightforward visual inspection, one-part dry-fix systems support code-compliant construction practices and help ensure consistent fire-resistance performance across every floor and project.

This was originally published in the December 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

IFE and FIA fire safety guidance targets serviced apartments and aparthotels in England

Fire safety grey area inside aparthotels

The Institution of Fire Engineers (IFE), working with the Fire Industry Association (FIA), has published an introductory note on serviced apartments and aparthotels and the fire safety challenges they can create for design, compliance and building management in England.

The IFE said serviced apartments and aparthotels are increasingly common in UK urban developments and mixed-use buildings, with rental durations ranging from single nights to months or longer.

It said this creates uncertainty because the units can resemble standard flats but operate more like hotels in terms of occupant turnover and familiarity with the building.

The note said this grey area can affect both building design decisions and the way fire safety is managed during occupation.

Why occupancy affects compliance routes

The IFE said many fire regulations treat buildings containing “dwellings” differently from buildings that do not, and that the definition can be complex.

It said duration of occupancy is often a key factor, with daily rentals less likely to be classed as dwellings and year-long rentals more likely to meet that definition.

Regulation 5 of the Building Regulations sets out scenarios that can count as a “material change of use”, including changes to the number of dwellings or converting a building into a hotel.

The IFE said converting an existing building to serviced apartments or an aparthotel is likely to be treated as a material change of use, requiring compliance with the functional requirements of the Building Regulations.

In this scenario, the “non-worsening” criteria often applied to existing buildings would not apply.

The IFE said the trend of converting redundant city-centre offices into aparthotels or flats can be complex and may fall short of purpose-built residential standards if not carried out competently.

Fire safety strategy and evacuation decisions

The IFE said blocks of flats are often designed around a stay put approach, based on compartmentation and occupants being familiar with escape routes and procedures.

It said serviced apartments and aparthotels can challenge that approach because short-term occupants may be unfamiliar with the building, which can point towards simultaneous evacuation in some cases.

The note said any move towards simultaneous evacuation would bring different design and management needs, such as enhanced detection and alarm, clear signage, escape route management and a continuous staff presence with evacuation planning.

It said a hybrid approach may suit some buildings, where an initial smoke detector activation triggers an alarm within the flat of origin and escalates to full evacuation if a heat detector activates in a key location.

The IFE said this would need careful consideration alongside management response expectations and any smoke control system designed around one flat evacuating at a time.

Sprinklers or alternative automatic suppression systems should be considered as part of the overall strategy.

The note added that a hotel-based approach can also be challenging because many aparthotels include cooking facilities, which are not typically present in hotel bedrooms.

HRB status and fire risk assessment scope

The IFE said the status of a building as a Higher Risk Building (HRB) in England can depend on height and whether it contains at least two residential units, a care home or a hospital.

It said the definition of “residential units” excludes hotels, and that it is currently unclear how serviced apartments and aparthotels fit within HRB occupancy definitions.

The IFE said this distinction affects whether building control applications go to a Local Authority or Registered Building Control Approver for non-HRBs, or to the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) for HRBs.

It said HRBs in occupation must register with the BSR and have a Building Safety Case in place, and that failing to do so could be a criminal offence.

The note said changes in how units are rented could change the regulatory position, including scenarios where longer-term rentals lead to units being classed as dwellings.

The IFE said fire risk assessment scope can also change under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, because dwellings are excluded but non-dwellings must be included.

It said if units are not dwellings, fire risk assessments would need to cover the apartments themselves as well as common areas, affecting responsibilities, enforcement and compliance.

What this means for building fire roles

Fire engineers and fire engineering consultants may need to confirm intended occupancy patterns early, because the note links rental duration to how terms like “dwelling” may be interpreted in practice.

Risk assessors may face changes to fire risk assessment scope where units are treated as non-dwellings, because the note says this can extend assessment beyond common parts into apartments.

Architects, building services engineers and M&E engineers may need to reflect on evacuation strategy choices where occupant familiarity is low, because the note contrasts stay put assumptions with short-term occupancy patterns.

Facility managers and building managers may need to test whether any managed evacuation approach can be sustained over time, because the note describes reliance on 24/7 staffing, training and long-term financial commitment in some strategies.

Developers and those engaging with building control may need clarity on regulatory pathways and HRB status, because the note describes different oversight routes for HRBs and non-HRBs and the legal consequences tied to registration and safety case duties.