Firefighters from Grenfell Tower fire report long-term health disorders

Grenfell Tower firefighters suffer health issues from toxic smoke exposure

Over a quarter of firefighters who responded to the Grenfell Tower fire have reported lasting health issues, according to research published in the Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine.

The University of Central Lancashire conducted the study in collaboration with the Fire Brigades Union, analysing data from 524 of the 628 firefighters who attended the incident.

It revealed that 26% of firefighters reported a total of 301 health problems, including digestive, respiratory, and neurological diseases, as well as 11 cancer diagnoses.

Toxic smoke exposure exceeds safe levels

The study found that many firefighters experienced immediate symptoms such as choking, difficulty breathing, and vomiting due to exposure to toxic smoke.

Firefighters were subjected to levels of gases and particulate matter far beyond the Health and Safety Executive’s limits.

A majority of the affected firefighters reported not wearing respiratory protection, which was attributed to the severity of the incident.

Those exposed to smoke reported significantly higher rates of diseases within three years compared to those who were not.

Comparisons drawn to 9/11 health outcomes

The health issues reported by Grenfell firefighters mirror those experienced by first responders at the World Trade Centre collapse.

Following 9/11, a lifelong health monitoring program was established, leading to early diagnoses and treatment of cancers and other diseases.

In contrast, no comparable program exists for Grenfell responders, leaving many firefighters and residents without systematic health assessments or early intervention options.

Call for regular health monitoring of UK firefighters

Matt Wrack, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, emphasised the need for enhanced health testing, stating: “This research shows stark evidence of the health impact on firefighters who attended Grenfell.”

Professor Anna Stec, who led the study, echoed the call for preventive measures: “Firefighting is classified as a carcinogenic occupation.

“Regular health monitoring is essential to protect firefighters’ health.”

Grenfell Tower firefighters suffer health issues from toxic smoke exposure: Summary

Research from the University of Central Lancashire, in partnership with the Fire Brigades Union, revealed that 26% of Grenfell Tower firefighters now face long-term health disorders, including respiratory, digestive, and neurological diseases.

Published in the Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, the study found firefighters were exposed to toxic smoke levels far beyond safe limits, with many not wearing respiratory protection.

Health outcomes resemble those of 9/11 responders, who benefited from regular health monitoring, yet no such program exists for Grenfell firefighters or affected residents.

Experts and union representatives are urging the UK to implement systematic health monitoring to identify and treat diseases early.

Global HSE Group to exhibit fire safety solutions at Intersec 2025 Dubai

Global HSE Group to exhibit at Intersec 2025

Global HSE Group will attend Intersec 2025 from 14th to 16th January at the Dubai World Trade Centre.

The company plans to highlight its Global Technical Services division, comprising fire engineers and technical fire consultants who specialise in fire safety engineering, compliance, and fire risk management.

Fire safety solutions tailored for the UAE and Middle East

The team provides fire advisory services throughout the construction process, including fire safety design, fire strategy, technical support, design review, verification, and external wall technical reviews.

Their services aim to support projects in the UAE and Middle East by ensuring compliance with global safety standards.

Intersec 2025 marks a key event for the industry

Intersec 2025 will be the 26th edition of the event, following its 2024 Silver Jubilee.

The previous edition attracted over 47,000 trade buyers from 141 countries, including industry leaders and government officials.

Intersec is a significant platform for showcasing security, safety, and fire protection advancements.

Global HSE Group comments on their participation

Andrew Cooper, Managing Director of Global HSE Group, said: “We’ve looked at exhibiting at Intersec in Dubai for a number of years and felt that 2025 was the right time to take the leap.”

He added: “We have a huge amount of expertise and experience working across a variety of sectors, and our fire engineering services are perfectly suited to the UAE and Middle East to help ensure fire safety compliance.”

Global HSE Group to exhibit fire safety solutions at Intersec 2025 Dubai: summary

Global HSE Group will exhibit at Intersec 2025 in Dubai from 14th to 16th January.

They plan to showcase their Global Technical Services division, offering fire safety engineering, compliance, and fire risk management services.

Intersec 2025 follows a successful 2024 event that drew over 47,000 trade buyers from 141 countries.

Managing Director Andrew Cooper noted the company’s expertise and its suitability for the UAE and Middle Eastern markets.

Health and Safety Executive celebrates 50 years of workplace safety in Great Britain

The Health and Safety Executive’s 50-year journey

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the national regulator for health and safety in Great Britain, marked its 50th anniversary on 1 January 2025.

Established by the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, HSE officially launched on 1 January 1975.

Over the past five decades, it has contributed to reducing workplace fatalities and injuries, positioning Great Britain as one of the safest places to work.

According to HSE’s latest statistics, workplace deaths have decreased from 651 in 1974 to 138 in 2023/24.

Current mission and challenges

HSE’s Chief Executive, Sarah Albon, highlighted the ongoing relevance of the organisation’s mission despite changes in workplace practices over the years.

Sarah said: “We’re proud of our successes over the last five decades, but the fact remains that any work-related death is a tragedy, and there are still far too many workers suffering ill-health brought about by work activity.”

In 2022, HSE introduced its 10-year strategy, Protecting People and Places, which aims to tackle emerging challenges and extend its responsibilities.

Evolving responsibilities of HSE

The scope of HSE’s work has expanded beyond worker safety to include public safety and regulatory roles.

Recent duties include acting as the Building Safety Regulator and managing chemical regulations following Brexit.

Sarah noted: “It is hard to foresee what the world of work will look like in the next 50 years but as ever, our fundamental principle will continue to be to make sure that those who create risk, take responsibility for controlling risk.”

Government recognition of HSE’s impact

Sir Stephen Timms, Minister for Social Security and Disability, commended HSE’s contributions: “Over the last half-century this organisation has been at the heart of efforts to protect people and places across Britain. I would like to thank them for this vital work.”

He added that HSE’s mission aligns with ongoing initiatives such as the Get Britain Working White Paper and efforts to strengthen worker protections.

Health and Safety Executive celebrates 50 years of workplace safety in Great Britain: Summary

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) celebrated its 50th anniversary on 1 January 2025.

Founded under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the organisation has played a crucial role in reducing workplace fatalities from 651 in 1974 to 138 in 2023/24.

Chief Executive Sarah Albon highlighted HSE’s ongoing commitment to improving workplace safety and addressing emerging challenges, including public safety and chemical regulation.

Minister Sir Stephen Timms praised the organisation’s contributions to protecting workers and supporting government initiatives.

Asbestos awareness for emergency responders

With over 20 years in asbestos health, Samantha Collins, Principal Examiner (Asbestos), British Occupational Hygiene Society, discusses the unseen risks firefighting personnel face in asbestos exposure

I consider myself very lucky to have no real experience of the fire sector.

I have of course always been aware of the dangers firefighting personnel must face.

As an occupational hygienist with some health and safety experience, I can probably recognise some of the slightly less obvious issues such as smoke and soot inhalation, exposure to extreme temperatures and the risks of working in high-stress environments.

What I am ashamed to say, however, is that despite having worked within the asbestos industry for 20-plus years, asbestos exposure to firefighting personnel has never been at the forefront of my mind, possibly due to several reasons.

The first is that the ‘immediate risks’ to firefighter’s health and safety were always the ones I thought of first.

The second is that I always imagined the PPE, RPE and decontamination procedures within the emergency services to be of such a high standard that exposure to various ‘nasties’ would be almost non-existent, and finally, as an industry with the HSE as our regulator, we are primarily focussed on the exposure risk in ‘tradespeople’ and members of the public more so than emergency responders.

Recent press releases and campaigns, news articles and reports have all predominantly centred around the risk of asbestos in schools, hospitals and government buildings and there are more training courses marketed for electricians, plumbers, property maintenance workers etc than you can shake a stick at.

But what is this ‘asbestos’ and could we be doing more about it for the fire industry?

Understanding the risks

Asbestos, from a Greek word meaning “inextinguishable” is the name given to a group of ‘naturally occurring fibrous silicate minerals’ formed over time throughout the Earth’s crust.

The mineralogy of asbestos formation is somewhat complex and requires quite specific circumstances influenced by local geology and environmental conditions.

Asbestos was first reportedly discovered by the ancient Greeks and Romans and appears in early texts written by the Greek geographer and philosopher Strabo (64/63 BC – 24 AD) and the Roman naturalist ‘Pliny the Elder’ (AD 23/24 – AD 79).

Following its initial discovery, we quickly recognised the ‘magic’ properties of these asbestos minerals, notably their high resistance to fire and excessive heat, and its historical use has been found in many countries around the world used to strengthen clay cooking pots, form lamp and candle wicks, woven into fireproof tablecloths and interestingly even cremation blankets because the blanket itself didn’t burn and could contain the deceased’s ashes for easy separation from the rest of the funeral pyre.

Closer to home during the Industrial Revolution, the expansion of Britain’s global trading empire and the threat of a second World War, the use of asbestos in the UK became more widespread, particularly in the aftermath of WWII when several political changes resulted in increased demand for schools, hospitals and government buildings, and a general desire of the country to get back on its’ feet.

Cheap and readily available

There are reportedly more than 200 different types of asbestos mineral globally, however, due to various reasons, including how abundant they were and how commercially viable they were to extract, only 6 types tend to be ‘regulated’ in the UK.

These are Chrysotile, Crocidolite, Amosite (more often known by their colours as white, blue and brown respectively) and the slightly rarer types of Fibrous Anthophyllite, Tremolite and Actinolite.

The concept of new construction and engineering materials which were strong, cheap, readily available and more importantly said to ‘save lives’ through fire protection, meant demand and importation of asbestos fibre and the production of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) skyrocketed.

ACMs quickly found their way into various installations around the country with the number of imports increasing steadily from the late 1930s, peaking in the 1970s and only finally reducing throughout the 80s and 90s when awareness of the health risks associated with asbestos exposure began to expand until asbestos was finally banned in the UK in 1999.

It’s estimated that during the 20th Century over 6 million tonnes of asbestos were imported into the UK, mostly as ‘raw fibre’ direct from the mines of countries such as South Africa, Canada, Russia, Cyprus and Australia.

Often arriving by sea and distributed countrywide by road and rail, UK factories and processing plants produced a variety of different ACMs.

There are thought to be approximately 3600 different types of ACMs in the UK.

We have thermal insulation, fireproofing, firebreaks and ‘compartmentalisation’ materials, ‘sprayed coatings’, friction products such as clutch linings and brake pads, roofs and rainwater goods moulded from asbestos-containing cement, ‘Artex’ ceilings, floor tiles, toilet cisterns and even full woven asbestos firefighting suits at one point in time – the list goes on.

The ancient Greeks and Romans may have had conflicting ideas of what asbestos was and where it came from.

They were however in agreement that asbestos caused illness in human beings noting that workers involved in extracting the fibres from the ground or weaving them into cloths and ropes often developed ‘lung sickness’ and had short life expectancies.

Unfortunately, as advancements were made in medicine it became undeniable that asbestos exposure was a serious health concern.

Due to the unique fibrous shape of the minerals, the microscopic size of the fibres, their ability to become easily airborne when agitated, and their resistance to heat, acids and alkalis, once they enter the human body (usually via the respiratory system) they can remain in situ for decades without being broken down or removed by our body’s defences.

This can cause devastating damage including diseases and conditions such as lung cancer, asbestosis, pleural plaques, pleural effusions (lung fluid accumulation), pericardial effusions (build-up of fluid around the heart) and even laryngeal and ovarian cancers.

There is also the infamous ‘mesothelioma’ whereby inhaled fibres can migrate through the lung tissue, penetrate the lung wall and lodge themselves in the pleural lining on the outside of the lungs where they can trigger the growth of aggressive cancerous tumours.

Health impact of asbestos exposure

The frightening thing is that the effects of asbestos exposure and inhalation are not immediate; there is a ‘latency’ period of anything between 15 and 60 years depending on the source of the information and asbestos is now firmly recognised by the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) as a Group 1 Human Carcinogen.

The current stance of the regulators in the UK is that if ACMs are not disturbed and the risk of any fibres being released and becoming airborne is mitigated, then ACMs should stay in place and be ‘managed’.

They are often still doing an important job of thermally insulating or fire-proofing structures and their removal could compromise structural integrity and/or cause unnecessary exposure to removal workers and the public.

There are issues with removal costs; who is liable for these costs, and what we should do with waste asbestos.

Currently, it’s buried at specialist landfill sites but many of these sites are now ‘full’ and ideas on dealing with asbestos waste in the future are limited.

Under the current Control of Asbestos Regulations (2012) Duty Holders are legally obliged to survey their properties for ACMs, keep a register of what and where they are and have a management plan to monitor condition and mitigate exposure.

In addition, we have legal training requirements stating anyone liable to disturb the ‘fabric’ of a building during their work must have a minimum of ‘asbestos awareness’ training to educate them in what different ACMs can look like, their different applications and how to avoid exposure.

There are also tight restrictions on knowingly working with asbestos including minimum RPE and PPE requirements, control measures to reduce fibre levels if disturbed and the all-important site and personnel decontamination.

Limitations of current safety protocols

Whether this system is working however is hotly debated both by industry leaders and politicians, with the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) Select Committee raising its concerns with the Government in 2021 about the usefulness of the regulations for managing asbestos, prompting a review on ‘effectiveness’ by the HSE.

The reason is that despite the legal requirements in place we still have more than 5000 people dying each year in the UK from asbestos-related disease.

So even with the regulations in place and a duty to Manage which has been in effect since 2004, we are still seeing many annual deaths, and this is mostly with our focus on managing asbestos in a controlled way within buildings which are intact or undergoing planned demolition.

Registers should be in place for contractors to reference before starting work; tradespeople are taught not to conduct any work without the correct information and we usually have the small luxury of time for planning and acting when it comes to ACMs in the form of training, data retrieval, method statements and risk assessments.

However, what do we do about emergencies, explosions, unplanned structural collapse, fire and dare I say terrorist attacks?

Of course, these are situations where something has the potential to end a life immediately which understandably takes precedence over some strange ‘fibrous rock’, exposure to which may or may not cause harm in the next 30 years, but should we be doing more when it comes to safeguarding firefighting personnel from this so-called ‘Magic Mineral’?

This article was originally published in the December 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal – to read your FREE digital copy, click here.

Mental health-related absences cost Avon Fire and Rescue over £841,000

Mental health absences reported by Avon Fire and Rescue

Avon Fire and Rescue Service (AFRS) has reported more than 5,800 staff absences attributed to mental health issues over the past three years.

According to data obtained by Accident Claims Advice (ACA) through a Freedom of Information Request, AFRS staff lost a total of 5,858 days or shifts between 2021 and 2024 due to mental health reasons.

Anxiety and depression accounted for 2,133 of these days, while post-traumatic stress resulted in the loss of 560 days.

Impact of mental health absences on service costs

The financial impact of these mental health-related absences is estimated to have cost AFRS approximately £841,038 over three years.

For the 2021/22 period, AFRS calculated that 2,086 days lost to mental health cost the service £286,768.56.

This figure decreased to £244,611.90 the following year but increased again to £309,657.60 in 2023/24 as daily staff costs rose.

Fire Brigades Union calls for action

Matt Wrack, General Secretary of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), commented on the data: “We are facing a mental health crisis in the fire and rescue service.

“Since attending traumatic incidents is an unavoidable part of the job for firefighters, mental health support is vital.”

Wrack also highlighted variations in mental health provision across the UK fire services and linked the issue to a decade of cuts: “To address this mental health crisis, we need central government to provide the investment needed to rebuild the service.”

Staff ill health departures in Avon Fire and Rescue

The AFRS data also revealed that in 2021/22, 23% of staff departures were due to ill health, which may include mental health reasons.

In subsequent years, no departures were officially recorded as related to health in 2022/23, and only one staff member left due to ill health in 2023/24.

Mental health-related absences cost Avon Fire and Rescue over £841,000: Summary

Avon Fire and Rescue Service has reported 5,858 staff days lost to mental health-related absences between 2021 and 2024.

Conditions such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress were the primary causes.

The financial impact of these absences was estimated at £841,038 over three years.

Daily costs per staff member rose from £137.44 in 2021/22 to £153.60 in 2023/24.

The Fire Brigades Union highlighted the need for improved mental health support for firefighters and called for increased government funding to address the crisis.

AFRS data also showed varying rates of staff departures due to ill health in recent years.

Dee Arp named INSHPO President for 2025 to advance OSH profession

Dee Arp to lead INSHPO as President in 2025

Dee Arp, Chief Quality Officer at NEBOSH, has been appointed as President of the International Network of Safety and Health Professional Organisations (INSHPO) for 2025.

Her presidency will follow the work of Nathan Winter, the 2024 President.

Arp will focus on advancing the occupational safety and health (OSH) profession globally through strategic research and expanding membership.

Arp began her involvement with INSHPO in 2020 as NEBOSH’s representative and Secretary-Treasurer.

On 1 January 2023, she was elected Vice President.

Focus on expanding INSHPO membership

During her presidency, Arp will prioritise research to identify gaps within the current INSHPO membership.

She will also work to engage new partners with the aim of broadening INSHPO’s reach and influence.

The goal is to extend the organisation’s global impact and further strengthen the OSH community.

This aligns with INSHPO’s mission to collaborate on professional standards and safety initiatives internationally.

Dee Arp’s extensive experience in OSH

Arp brings over 25 years of experience in occupational health and safety.

She is a Chartered Safety and Health Practitioner of IOSH and a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors.

In her role at NEBOSH, Arp oversees the development and assessment of qualifications while ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

She also holds a Certificate of Continuing Education from Cambridge University and is currently pursuing a Master’s in Education.

Commitment to advancing the OSH profession

Arp is known for her belief in collaboration within the OSH community.

Her philosophy is summarised in her statement: “stronger together.”

She emphasises that collective efforts within the OSH profession are key to saving lives and ensuring safety.

Arp aims to continue building on the legacy of her predecessors to drive the profession forward.

Dee Arp named INSHPO President for 2025 to advance OSH profession: Summary

Dee Arp, NEBOSH’s Chief Quality Officer, will assume the role of President at INSHPO in 2025.

She succeeds Nathan Winter and will focus on expanding the organisation’s membership and global reach.

Arp has been involved with INSHPO since 2020, serving as its Secretary-Treasurer before becoming Vice President in 2023.

With over 25 years of experience in occupational health and safety, she holds professional designations, including Chartered Safety and Health Practitioner and Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors.

Her leadership at NEBOSH includes overseeing qualification development and regulatory compliance.

Arp’s presidency will prioritise collaboration and research to address membership gaps, reflecting her commitment to advancing the OSH profession globally.

Addressing firefighter safety concerns: Martin Joosen shares insights into advanced training methods and the future of robotic firefighting

By Martin Joosen, Senior Vice President/Managing Director, LION EMEA

The fire and safety industry faces ongoing challenges that demand continuous adaptation.

One of the major concerns for fire brigades is adapting to advancements that present new problems that didn’t exist before, like electric vehicles and highly secure buildings that are difficult to enter.

They need to continuously seek new technologies and updated training to help them address these issues.

From a health and safety perspective, there are risks around toxic particles in black smoke, which contribute to high cancer rates among firefighters.

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is crucial for their protection, but contamination of this equipment is also a challenge.

More rules and regulations are emerging to ensure they are not exposed to harmful particles.

LION Protects is in the business of the training of firefighters, where all these challenges converge.

The real-life challenges need to be incorporated into training environments to prepare firefighters effectively. We see two developments here.

First, as specialists in building training facilities, we aim to provide them with the latest technology for training.

For example, how do you extinguish fires in electric vehicles? We are developing tools and vehicles to enable them to train on procedures specific to electric vehicles compared to traditional ones.

Second, there’s the issue of decontamination. Firefighters are not frequently exposed to real fires due to safety systems and building practices, especially in Europe.

However, in training environments, they are exposed to real fires more often.

While contamination and black smoke are dangerous, they’re not frequently encountered in real situations, but they are in training.

This is where our NFT program comes in.

By combining the three elements of fire systems – carbonaceous, gas, and digital – we can reduce exposure while still providing 100% effective training with fewer toxic particles, less environmental impact like CO₂ emissions, and better total cost of ownership.

In many industries, human beings are reaching the end of their technological involvement in certain tasks – why would we send real people into a fire when we could use robots in the future? Drones have been developed that can extinguish fires from the outside of a building.

While there are limitations, I foresee a future where firefighters are increasingly replaced – not in terms of their knowledge, but in terms of the physical human presence.

We will always have fires to contend with. We will always need firefighters to some extent, but their roles will evolve.

About the IFSJ Influencer

Martin Joosen joined LION in 2018 leading the Sales and Marketing department.

He is responsible for Europe, Asia, Middle-East and Pacific.

He studied at the Erasmus University and Nyenrode University with a master’s in management and economics.

He has more than 20 Years experience in International Business, 17 of which are in the Fire Rescue Market, and more than 5 years experience in international projects.

He is now the Senior Vice President/Managing Director, LION EMEA.

IFSJ Influencers Edition 2024

The 2024 Influencers Special Edition of International Fire and Safety Journal is a collection of some of the most influential voices across the fire and safety industry, representing a collective following of 4.2 million.

Together, they provide a comprehensive overview of the latest developments, challenges, and forward-looking insights shaping the global fire and safety sector.

Read all 30 influencer articles in the digital magazine now.

This article was originally published in the December 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

 

NEBOSH CEO to deliver seminar at Intersec 2025

Andy Shenstone to highlight communication strategies at Intersec, NEBOSH Day to feature insights on C-suite communication

Andy Shenstone, Chief Executive of NEBOSH, will deliver the opening seminar at NEBOSH Day during the 26th edition of Intersec, held at the Dubai World Trade Centre on 15 January 2025.

As reported by NEBOSH, Shenstone’s presentation will focus on strategies for effectively communicating with C-suite executives.

He will discuss the importance of aligning health and safety proposals with organisational missions, key performance indicators (KPIs), and strategic objectives to secure executive buy-in.

Key principles for engaging executive leadership

The seminar will outline essential steps for engaging with senior leadership.

This includes researching company objectives, crafting narratives that connect proposals to long-term goals, and tailoring messages to resonate with executive priorities.

Andy Shenstone shared his approach: “Answer the ‘so what?’. What is the proposal, why is it a good idea (evidence), what are the costs and what are the expected benefits?”

He emphasised avoiding jargon and ensuring health and safety proposals are accessible to non-specialists.

Practical strategies for presenting to the C-suite

Shenstone will also address the practical aspects of C-suite engagement, such as preparation, concise communication, and using data-driven insights effectively.

NEBOSH advises focusing on clear, evidence-based messaging that highlights solutions aligned with an organisation’s strategic vision.

Additionally, presenters are encouraged to conclude with actionable next steps to demonstrate a commitment to implementation.

NEBOSH Day registration details

NEBOSH Day at Intersec 2025 is free to attend, and registration is currently open.

The event aims to provide professionals with insights and strategies to enhance workplace health and safety through effective leadership communication.

Further information, including the full agenda, is available on the NEBOSH website.

Andy Shenstone to highlight communication strategies at Intersec: Summary

Andy Shenstone, NEBOSH Chief Executive, will deliver the opening seminar at NEBOSH Day during Intersec 2025, held on 15 January at the Dubai World Trade Centre.

Shenstone will explore strategies for effectively communicating health and safety proposals to C-suite executives.

The presentation will cover aligning proposals with company goals, tailoring messages for executive audiences, and ensuring evidence-based insights are accessible and actionable.

Attendees will also learn practical steps for engaging senior leadership, including preparation, concise communication, and data-driven presentations.

Registration for NEBOSH Day is free and open now, with full details available on the NEBOSH website.

The Silent Threat: CO-Gas Safety explains the unseen dangers of carbon monoxide poisoning

Stephanie Trotter OBE, President of CO-Gas Safety, discusses the unseen dangers of CO poisoning and advocates for crucial changes in public awareness and safety measures

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is an often-overlooked but lethal hazard, claiming lives and leaving lasting impacts on survivors.

CO-Gas Safety, an independent, registered charity founded in 1995, is dedicated to preventing unintentional CO-related fatalities and injuries, supporting affected families and collecting data to drive awareness and safety improvements.

Stephanie Trotter, OBE, the charity’s President and Director, has played a crucial role in this mission.

A barrister and advocate for safety, her journey began through personal encounters with preventable accidents and tragic stories like that of Molly Maher, who lost her son to CO poisoning.

In this interview, IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey speaks with Stephanie about her work with CO-Gas Safety, the challenges in raising public awareness and her ongoing efforts to address the often-invisible dangers of CO poisoning across the UK.

Stephanie shares her insights into the importance of legislation, public education and the powerful role survivors’ stories play in driving meaningful safety reforms.

What exactly is carbon monoxide and why is it so dangerous?

CO is a deadly gas emitted from faulty cooking, heating, or other appliances powered by carbon-based fuels such as gas, coal, wood, or oil.

It cannot be detected by human senses—smell, taste, sight, or touch.

Less than 2% of CO in the air can kill in under three minutes.

Firefighters say that with the first breath you don’t know there’s a problem, by the second you might suspect something’s wrong, but by the third you’re unable to take any action.

CO is lethal because it binds to the haemoglobin in blood, which normally carries oxygen around our bodies, effectively suffocating us.

CO₂ (carbon dioxide) consists of one atom of carbon and two of oxygen, whereas CO contains one atom of carbon and one of oxygen.

CO is emitted when there is a lack of oxygen at the flame.

How is CO typically produced by faulty appliances such as cookers or heaters?

If a gas appliance is clogged with dust and debris, there will be a lack of oxygen at the flame.

If the ventilation grille or chimney/flue is blocked, or lack of air in a small room, the oxygen can quickly become depleted. Both issues can occur simultaneously.

Why can’t carbon monoxide be detected by human senses?

Humans cannot detect CO because it’s colourless, odourless and tasteless.

Some people report that pets like dogs and cats can sense something is wrong.

Other combustion products, such as aromatic hydrocarbons, can sometimes be detected by humans, but they’re not always present.

Testing a survivor’s breath or blood can be unreliable because CO quickly leaves the body, yet the person can continue to suffer injury even after removal from exposure to CO.

What are some of the key warning signs that a gas appliance might be faulty or producing CO emissions?

The fuel industry suggests that visual signs like soot or condensation can indicate CO.

A blue flame is unlikely to emit CO, while an orange flame could be a warning.

However, relying on visual signs is dangerous because CO cannot be sensed by humans.

Even an appliance with a perfect-looking blue flame can emit CO.

The only way to be certain is to test the air using a flue gas analyser or similar instrument designed to detect CO.

What steps can individuals take to prevent CO poisoning in their homes?

Any appliance powered by carbon-based fuel can emit CO if faulty.

To prevent CO poisoning, awareness of the danger is essential.

Ensure appliances are properly installed by qualified professionals according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

In the UK, this means you must by law use a Gas Safe Registered Engineer (GSE) qualified to work on that appliance.

Regular maintenance is crucial.

Adequate ventilation must be ensured so there’s enough oxygen at the flame to produce CO₂ instead of CO.

Chimneys and flues should be swept and checked by a sweep belonging to a recognised trade association.

Appliances without flues, like gas cookers and portable gas heaters, are extremely dangerous.

As an extra safeguard, purchase and install a CO alarm compliant with EN50291 in Europe.

Buy alarms from reputable suppliers, not the Internet, and substandard alarms have been recalled.

Make sure to activate the alarm correctly. CO alarms are effective at preventing death or serious injury but are not health monitors. They are designed to sound at certain levels of CO over time.

The EN standard requires that the alarm must not sound until at least 30 parts per million (PPM) of CO is sensed for two hours.

Higher levels trigger the alarm sooner.

WHO guidelines state there should be no more than 4 PPM over 24 hours.

Research indicates that even levels around these guidelines can cause brain damage in older adults.

Effects on children and babies are likely to be worse because the smaller you are, the faster CO affects you.

This is why miners used canaries as the first alert to CO.

Will gas emergency services always test for carbon monoxide if called out to a gas leak?

In the UK, there is no mandatory duty on the gas emergency service to test the air or emissions from appliances for CO.

There is no mandatory duty on Registered Gas Safe engineers to test for CO, although many do.

There is also no obligation to inform those exposed or their medics about that CO exposure.

Surely there should be a mandatory duty on engineers to test for CO whenever practicable? Ofgem, which licenses gas companies, has duties to raise awareness of CO and to customers in vulnerable situations.

After lobbying, Ofgem provided funding for gas emergency service companies run by the Gas distribution Networks which are now testing for CO but only for customers in vulnerable situations, such as those on the Priority Services Register (the sick, the poor, elderly, disabled, those with young children, or in remote areas).

Ofgem allows the networks to decide who qualifies as vulnerable.

Some companies like Cadent and Northern Gas Networks are leading in testing efforts, using CMDDA1 qualified engineers, but only about 2% of engineers have this qualification.

Even then, engineers often refuse to test if the customer is a tenant.

We have offered our expertise to help with data collection but have yet to have a meaningful meeting.

Ofgem has indicated that if the Health & Safety Executive deems CO testing a safety issue, they would need to fund testing for everyone.

Yet it seems to us that HSE is uninterested.

What policy changes or regulations do you believe are necessary to address CO safety in homes?

Firstly, awareness and prevention are crucial. Secondly, appliances and air in homes should be tested where practicable.

If CO is found, the PPM results should be provided to survivors and their medics in writing or digitally from a named engineer.

This should become mandatory.

Thirdly, test data should be collected and published with case studies where practicable.

Fourthly, blood tests should be performed on the deceased, especially where death is unexplained, as CO remains stable in dead bodies.

Lastly, victims, survivors and families should be assisted to help identify new dangers and gaps.

This body or a new one could be funded by a levy on the fuel industry and operate independently, similar to the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK.

Studies suggest that between 3 and 13 million people in the UK could be exposed to dangerous levels of CO (over 50 PPM).

What steps do you think should be taken globally to improve CO safety and prevent further tragedies?

Globally, countries need to legislate to create bodies responsible for CO safety.

Fuel companies could lobby governments to establish these bodies, and/or governments could impose legislation.

Necessary bodies include licensing authorities to ensure safe gas supply, funded by levies on fuel companies, regulatory agencies similar to the Health and Safety Executive to approve safety cases from supply companies, a national emergency service for fuel-related incidents, professional registers to ensure correct training for engineers and chimney sweeps and independent organisations to support survivors and families, collect and publish data, conduct research and suggest safety improvements.

For more information visit www.co-gassafety.co.uk or contact office@co-gassafety.co.uk

This article was originally published in the December 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.

MEIKO TopClean D: Cleaner gear, healthier firefighters

Learn how FTZ Oldenburg enhanced PPE decontamination, improving technician safety and reducing resource use with MEIKO TopClean D

Decontaminating personal protective equipment (PPE) remains a persistent challenge within the fire and rescue sector.

Manual cleaning methods expose technicians to hazardous substances and demand considerable time and resources.

MEIKO’s TopClean D offers a machine-based solution designed to replace manual pre-cleaning of equipment such as self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) sets, masks and air bottles.

This article examines the importance of this innovative approach, outlines its benefits and presents a case study from FTZ Oldenburg to illustrate its practical application.

The problem of manual pre-cleaning

Manual pre-cleaning of PPE presents numerous risks and inefficiencies.

Technicians are directly exposed to harmful substances during the cleaning process, including pathogens, toxic fine dust and chemical residues.

This exposure increases the likelihood of health issues and potential contamination spread within the facility.

The process is also time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Manual cleaning requires substantial amounts of water and cleaning chemicals and occupies valuable technician time that could be better utilised elsewhere.

The labour-intensive nature of manual pre-cleaning can lead to bottlenecks in operations, affecting the readiness and efficiency of fire and rescue services.

Moreover, many facilities lack dedicated cleaning spaces with proper hygiene controls.

Small, non-specialised areas make it difficult to maintain the necessary separation between clean and dirty zones, heightening the risk of cross-contamination.

Without adequate zoning, contaminants can easily transfer from soiled equipment to cleaned items or other areas of the workshop.

Additionally, technicians may have to perform pre-cleaning tasks outdoors due to space constraints, exposing them to adverse weather conditions.

This hampers the cleaning process and adds discomfort and potential safety risks for the staff involved.

Introducing the TopClean D

The TopClean D by MEIKO is a machine-based pre-cleaning solution specifically designed to address the challenges of manual PPE cleaning in the fire and rescue sector.

It effectively replaces manual cleaning of SCBA sets, masks and air bottles, enhancing both safety and operational efficiency.

One of the key features of the TopClean D is the elimination of the need for equipment disassembly.

Technicians can load complete SCBA sets directly into the machine, reducing handling time and minimising the risk of damage or contamination during disassembly and reassembly.

This streamlines the workflow and reduces the potential for human error.

The machine utilises patented wash pipes that reverse direction, ensuring thorough removal of soot and other contaminants without leaving spray shadows.

Despite the hydrophobic properties of soot, this mechanism guarantees effective cleaning of all equipment surfaces.

Additionally, the TopClean D employs patented heads for BA masks that prevent contamination from being carried inside the masks.

This is crucial for maintaining the hygiene of respiratory equipment and safeguarding the health of firefighters who rely on it in the field.

Resource efficiency is another significant advantage.

The TopClean D uses only 5.8 litres of water per cycle and completes cleaning processes in 4 to 16 minutes, depending on the load.

This represents a substantial reduction in water and energy consumption compared to manual methods, without compromising on cleaning performance.

Safety, efficiency and resource savings

By automating the pre-cleaning process, the TopClean D significantly reduces technicians’ exposure to harmful substances.

The closed system operation prevents direct contact with pathogens, toxic dust and cleaning chemicals.

Adhering strictly to manufacturer specifications regarding temperature and chemical dosage, the machine ensures PPE is cleaned safely and effectively.

The patented mask heads and compressed air connection prevent contamination inside masks and moisture ingress into regulators, further enhancing safety.

The TopClean D streamlines the cleaning process, reducing the time required to clean PPE from hours to mere minutes.

With cleaning cycles ranging from 4 to 16 minutes, technicians can process equipment more quickly, improving turnaround times and operational readiness.

This efficiency allows staff to focus on other critical tasks within the respiratory protective equipment (RPE) workshop.

Incorporating an intelligent heat recovery system, the TopClean D lowers energy consumption and contributes to a more comfortable indoor climate by reducing steam emission.

Using only 5.8 litres of water per cycle, it is more economical than traditional manual cleaning methods, leading to cost savings and a reduced environmental footprint.

The machine’s flexible rack system can accommodate various types of PPE: Four complete SCBA sets; Twelve BA masks stretched on plastic heads; Four compressed air bottles; and a combination of the above equipment.

This versatility allows fire and rescue services to tailor the cleaning process to their specific needs, enhancing operational flexibility.

The TopClean D features a front-loading design with an extendable rack, allowing for convenient loading and unloading.

This ergonomic consideration reduces physical strain on technicians.

Additionally, the reduced steam emission conserves energy but also improves the working environment, promoting better overall comfort and safety.

Case Study – FTZ Oldenburg

FTZ Oldenburg, situated in the German municipality of Ganderkesee, provides technical support for 31 voluntary fire services.

With two technicians responsible for decontaminating approximately 3,000 BA masks and over 1,000 regulators, the centre faced significant challenges related to space limitations and the inefficiencies of manual pre-cleaning.

Initially, the RPE workshop lacked sufficient space, compelling technicians to perform pre-cleaning outdoors regardless of weather conditions.

This situation was uncomfortable and posed risks related to inconsistent hygiene standards and increased potential for cross-contamination.

To overcome these challenges, FTZ Oldenburg relocated the pre-cleaning process to a shipping container equipped with the TopClean D.

This solution provided a dedicated space, allowing for proper separation between dirty and clean zones, which is essential for maintaining hygiene and preventing contamination.

The impact was immediate and substantial.

“We were able to decontaminate 30 SCBA sets in our RPE workshop on that first day,” reported Frank Hattendorf, head of the RPE workshop at FTZ Oldenburg.

The machine replaced manual labour and significantly reduced the time and effort required for pre-cleaning tasks.

Hattendorf highlighted the user-friendly design and compatibility of MEIKO’s systems: “We were really impressed by the care and attention paid to every technical detail.

For example, the small parts racks can be used in all MEIKO machines, which shows how they value compatibility.

And the fact that all MEIKO machines work according to the same principle makes them simple to operate, even for people who don’t use them very often.”

The adoption of the TopClean D improved safety by minimising technicians’ exposure to hazardous substances and provided a more efficient and ergonomic working environment.

The container setup also shielded technicians from adverse weather conditions, enhancing overall job satisfaction and safety.

Long-term benefits and future implications

The introduction of the TopClean D has had lasting positive effects on FTZ Oldenburg’s operations.

The centre has achieved significant time savings and enhanced safety protocols, allowing technicians to focus more on essential tasks such as drying and testing equipment.

Looking ahead, FTZ Oldenburg plans to integrate more MEIKO systems as part of their workshop expansion.

This scalability demonstrates the TopClean D’s ability to adapt to evolving needs, making it a sustainable and future-proof solution for other fire services facing similar challenges.

The partnership between FTZ Oldenburg and MEIKO is built on trust and a shared commitment to improving safety and efficiency.

MEIKO has expressed its readiness to support FTZ Oldenburg’s future developments.

Jens Jacobsen, MEIKO’s sales manager for personal protective equipment, stated: “As soon as approval comes through to extend the RPE workshop, we will be happy to support the FTZ with all our expertise and technology and partner with them on the planning process.”

For other fire and rescue services, the success at FTZ Oldenburg illustrates the tangible benefits of adopting machine-based pre-cleaning solutions like the TopClean D.

By enhancing safety, efficiency and resource management, such technology can significantly improve operational effectiveness and personnel well-being.

MEIKO’s TopClean D provides an effective solution to the challenges associated with PPE decontamination in the fire and rescue sector.

By replacing manual pre-cleaning with a machine-based process, it reduces technicians’ exposure to harmful substances, saves time and conserves resources.

The case study of FTZ Oldenburg demonstrates the practical benefits of implementing the TopClean D, highlighting improvements in safety, efficiency and overall operations.

As the fire and rescue sector continues to seek ways to enhance its practices, MEIKO’s TopClean D stands as a valuable tool in ensuring PPE hygiene and protecting the health of personnel.

This article was originally published in the November 2024 issue of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE digital copy, click here.