Nearly half of e-bike fires in 2024 linked to post-market conversions

by Breaking NewsResearchSafetyVehicles

E-bike and e-scooter fires reported to OPSS in 2024

The UK Office for Product Safety & Standards (OPSS) has reported that 211 fires involving e-bikes or e-scooters were notified by fire and rescue services in 2024.

This figure is drawn from voluntary product-related fire notifications sent by fire investigation teams who identified these vehicles as the most probable cause of a fire.

London Fire Brigade submitted the majority of these notifications, accounting for 175 of the total.

OPSS clarified that these reports are used to identify potential product safety issues but should not be used to estimate national fire figures or compare fire and rescue service performance.

The notification process was relaunched in 2023 with updated guidance, which has led to a gradual increase in the number of submissions from UK fire and rescue services.

Conversions account for large share of e-bike fires

According to OPSS data, 170 of the 211 fires involved e-bikes, with 45% of these (77 incidents) involving post-market conversions.

These conversions are typically kits added to standard pedal bicycles, often outside manufacturer-approved conditions.

Fires involving e-bikes of unknown build totalled 59 incidents.

Manufactured e-bikes were cited in 34 fire reports.

There were also 39 fires involving e-scooters, one involving an e-unicycle, and one involving a mobility scooter.

OPSS stated that this breakdown is based on voluntary submissions using either the government’s notification template or bespoke spreadsheets and templates submitted by individual services.

Revisions to earlier datasets have also been made, with figures for 2022 and 2023 updated based on late notifications.

Residential settings accounted for two-thirds of incidents

OPSS reported that 66% of fires involving e-bikes or e-scooters in 2024 occurred in indoor or residential locations.

The most commonly affected property types included single occupancy houses (45 fires) and purpose-built flats or maisonettes (38 fires).

Sixteen incidents took place in houses of multiple occupation, and 15 in converted flats or maisonettes.

Commercial properties such as retail units and restaurants accounted for 15 reported fires.

Garage or shed fires were reported in 7 incidents.

Four fires occurred in hotels or hostels.

New classifications introduced in the 2024 dataset included ‘road vehicle’ and ‘public transport and infrastructure’, accounting for 4 and 2 fires respectively.

In 16 cases, the property type was not specified.

OPSS noted that these revised categories allow for more accurate analysis of risk environments compared with previous years.

Fires mostly started indoors or in outdoor domestic spaces

The point of fire ignition was recorded for most incidents, with 101 of the 211 fires beginning in indoor spaces.

These included sleeping areas (20 fires), living rooms (25), kitchens (13), corridors (14), and indoor storage areas (8).

Seventy-eight fires occurred outdoors, including on roads or streets (37 fires), gardens or courtyards (19), parks or open land (9), and balconies (8).

Garage or shed fires were also counted in this outdoor grouping, totalling 11 incidents.

Transport-related fire origins were recorded in 3 cases.

OPSS reported that 29 fires had unknown or unclassified ignition locations.

The expanded categories for 2024 provided more detailed insight into fire settings, including newly added tags such as bathroom area, railway infrastructure, and outdoor storage areas.

Battery ignition and charging linked to many incidents

In 93% of the 2024 incidents (196 out of 211), batteries or generators were identified as the source of ignition.

Fifteen incidents had no confirmed ignition source.

Charging status was known in 162 incidents, or 77% of cases.

Of the total fires, 82 (39%) occurred while the device was charging.

A further 80 (38%) occurred when the product was not on charge.

Charging status could not be determined in 49 incidents (23%).

Converted e-bikes were disproportionately represented in charging-related fires, with 38 of 77 incidents (49%) occurring during charging.

E-scooter fires occurred during charging in 16 of 39 incidents (41%).

For manufactured e-bikes, 12 of 34 fires occurred while charging (35%), and for e-bikes of unknown build, 15 of 59 (25%) were charging at the time.

OPSS warned that the high number of unknown charging statuses limits the ability to directly compare across product types.

Eight fatalities and 86 casualties recorded in 2024

OPSS recorded 5 fatal incidents involving e-bikes or e-scooters in 2024, resulting in 8 deaths.

A further 42 fires led to non-fatal casualties, totalling 86 individuals.

OPSS stated that these figures only include cases where such outcomes were explicitly disclosed in the notification data.

This means the true number of fatalities and injuries may be higher.

Figures from earlier years, including 2022 and 2023, were updated in this release to reflect delayed data returns.

The department confirmed that future revisions would continue as more notifications are received, and any necessary corrections would be made with clear explanation.

E-bike and e-scooter fires in the UK: 2024 report: Summary

OPSS received 211 notifications of e-bike and e-scooter fires in 2024.

170 fires involved e-bikes.

77 of these were post-market conversions.

59 e-bike fires involved unknown build types.

34 fires involved manufactured e-bikes.

39 incidents involved e-scooters.

One fire involved an e-unicycle and one involved a mobility scooter.

66% of fires occurred in indoor or residential settings.

23% occurred in outdoor spaces.

3% were in transport settings.

London Fire Brigade submitted 175 reports.

Fire start locations included roads, living areas, sleeping areas, kitchens, and outdoor storage.

93% of fires had batteries or generators as the ignition source.

82 incidents occurred while charging.

80 occurred when not charging.

Charging status was unknown in 49 incidents.

5 incidents resulted in 8 fatalities.

42 incidents resulted in 86 casualties.

29 ignition locations were unclassified.

Figures are based on voluntary data from fire and rescue services.

Arson increase in London prompts inquiry by fire committee

by Breaking NewsResearch

Executive summary: London Assembly Fire Committee – Arson in London (3 June 2025)

On 3 June 2025, the London Assembly Fire Committee held a public meeting to examine the recent rise in arson offences across the capital.

The discussion brought together senior representatives from the London Fire Brigade (LFB) and an independent fire and resilience consultant.

The focus was on understanding the drivers behind the 28% increase in recorded arson incidents since 2022 and exploring collaborative strategies for prevention and response.

Attendees and contributors

  • Charlie Pugsley, Deputy Commissioner and Operational Director for Prevention, Protection & Policy, LFB
  • Pamela Oparaocha, Assistant Commissioner for Prevention and Protection, LFB
  • Stephen Mackenzie, Independent Fire, Security and Resilience Consultant
  • Assembly Members from the London Assembly Fire Committee

Overview of current trends

According to police data, the number of arson offences in London rose from 1,894 in 2022 to 2,430 in 2024, with the borough of Greenwich reporting the highest proportional increase.

In contrast, LFB data indicated a 10% reduction in deliberate fires over the same period.

The discrepancy between the two datasets was attributed to differences in classification, reporting processes, and the types of incidents included in each system.

The committee requested borough-level data from the LFB to enable a closer comparison with police figures and to identify local trends.

Fire brigade and police collaboration

When arson is suspected, firefighters conduct a first-level investigation at the scene, escalating to LFB’s dedicated fire investigation team in more serious or complex cases.

These teams work in coordination with the Metropolitan Police, who hold legal primacy in criminal investigations.

LFB also deploys fire dogs to help identify ignitable fluids, which supports the scope and accuracy of scene examination.

The importance of a multi-agency approach was repeatedly emphasised, particularly in complex incidents involving multiple agencies, forensic investigators, and civil authorities.

It was noted that routine collaboration also includes joint exercises, engagement with youth and community groups, and partnerships with mental health and social care services.

Data gaps and shared intelligence

Several participants stressed the need for more comprehensive and joined-up data.

In particular, it was argued that arson-related losses recorded by insurers, local authorities, and healthcare providers could offer valuable insights not captured in fire or police data alone.

Demographic patterns were also discussed, with concern raised that gaps in ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic data might be limiting the effectiveness of prevention work.

The use of “heat maps” and localised incident clustering was described as a helpful tool in borough-level risk management, particularly in identifying repeated patterns of deliberate fires in specific locations such as parks, housing estates, or transport hubs.

Fires in prisons

Deliberate fires in prisons emerged as a key area of concern.

Over the past two years, prisons accounted for a large proportion of high-frequency fire locations across London.

It was reported that 13% of primary fires attended by the LFB during this period were in prison facilities, particularly in boroughs with multiple institutions.

Prison staff provide initial firefighting capabilities, but LFB crews are regularly called to support incidents.

The risks of fire setting in these environments were described as complex, involving issues of security, mental health, resource disruption, and inmate ingenuity.

While some systems such as water mist suppression are available, their implementation has reportedly been inconsistent due to cost, maintenance concerns, and policy limitations.

Challenges in repeat offending

The committee explored how repeat arson offenders are identified and managed.

It was confirmed that the fire service does not routinely receive information about individuals with arson convictions following their release from custody, unless a specific risk has been flagged through multi-agency channels.

The discussion highlighted a distinction between opportunistic fire setting, often associated with youth or antisocial behaviour, and more serious or targeted acts linked to organised crime or mental health conditions.

The latter are often more difficult to predict or prevent without sustained inter-agency monitoring.

Trends in wildfires and open land arson

Wildfires and deliberate fires in open spaces were noted to have increased seasonally, often accounting for up to 60% of deliberate fire incidents at certain times of year.

These are especially challenging to investigate due to the lack of defined boundaries, destruction of evidence, and uncertainty around causes, such as the possible involvement of barbecues, discarded cigarettes or intentional ignition.

In response, borough-based patrols and public education campaigns have been implemented in some areas.

The importance of enabling local fire crews to lead tailored interventions was reiterated throughout the discussion.

Security threats and the weaponisation of fire

The potential for arson to be used as a tool of sabotage or terrorism was raised.

Arson was described as a low-technology method that can be used to target infrastructure, public buildings or soft civilian spaces, particularly in light of evolving global security concerns.

References were made to incidents across Europe potentially linked to state-backed actors, and to UK guidance on hostile fire use.

It was argued that fire safety and counterterrorism planning should be integrated across sectors and supported by updated legislation, threat assessments, and better coordination with intelligence agencies.

Youth intervention and prevention strategies

Youth engagement was a major focus of the meeting.

One-quarter of deliberate fire incidents involve individuals aged 17 or younger.

The LFB’s longstanding fire setters intervention scheme was presented as a successful model, with over 4,000 referrals since 2001 and a reported reoffending rate of under 10%.

The programme includes specialist support for neurodivergent young people and works closely with schools, families and mental health services.

It was confirmed that LFB does not currently operate a centralised arson reduction team, instead relying on station-level staff to identify and respond to risks using standardised toolkits and referral processes.

Community engagement and mental health

Several speakers highlighted the increasing intersection between arson, mental health and self-harm.

In some cases, individuals experiencing a mental health crisis have set fires as a means of self-injury.

These incidents have serious psychological impacts on first responders and underline the importance of post-incident reviews, safeguarding processes and trauma-informed support.

Concerns were also raised about the challenges of care-in-the-community models, particularly when individuals with known fire-setting behaviour are returned to general housing with limited oversight.

Examples were shared of targeted use of suppression systems in vulnerable households, but uptake of such technologies has reportedly been limited due to cost and lack of procurement support.

Public messaging and social media

The influence of social media on fire-setting behaviour, particularly among young people, was briefly discussed.

While no specific evidence was presented, there was agreement that prevention messaging needs to evolve with online trends and that digital content can both educate and glamorise unsafe behaviours.

Examples of past campaigns, such as “Fire Kills” and educational materials aimed at schools, were cited as models worth revisiting.

The importance of consistent messaging and collaboration with central government, broadcasters and tech platforms was acknowledged.

Fire suppression and funding challenges

Fire suppression technologies, including retrofitted systems for domestic settings, were viewed as valuable tools for reducing the impact of arson, especially in high-risk or vulnerable buildings.

However, concerns were raised that cost barriers and fragmented procurement have prevented wider adoption.

There were calls for further research into the cost-benefit case for suppression systems and a need for stronger engagement from insurers and housing providers in funding and implementing protective measures.

Some participants proposed the reinstatement of national-level research initiatives to evaluate risk mitigation strategies more comprehensively.

Conclusion and key takeaways

The meeting concluded with a summary of the key issues:

  • Disparities in fire and police data require better alignment and joint analysis.
  • Prisons have emerged as a concentrated risk area for deliberate fires.
  • Arson may increasingly be used as a tool for disruption, requiring greater preparedness.
  • Youth engagement and early intervention remain essential to long-term risk reduction.
  • Mental health-related arson presents a growing challenge in prevention and response.
  • Fire suppression systems offer protective benefits but face funding and adoption barriers.
  • A more centralised and research-driven national strategy could support local efforts.

Committee members welcomed the ongoing efforts of the LFB and partner organisations and called for sustained political and financial support for both operational response and long-term prevention work.

Arson increase in London prompts inquiry by fire committee: Summary

The London Assembly Fire Committee held a meeting on 3 June 2025 in response to rising arson offences in London.

Police data shows a 28% increase in arson cases across the capital from 2022 to 2024.

Greenwich recorded a 67% increase, the highest among all boroughs.

The London Fire Brigade stated that its internal data shows a 10% reduction in deliberate fires during the same period.

The committee requested borough-level data from LFB for comparison with police figures.

The London Fire Brigade identified prisons as key hotspots, representing 13% of primary fire locations over the last two years.

Fires in open land were noted to account for up to 60% of deliberate fire totals during certain months.

The LFB outlined collaboration processes with the Metropolitan Police during arson investigations.

Fire investigation dogs are used to detect accelerants and define the scope of fire scenes.

The Fire Committee heard that arson incidents are difficult to investigate in large or open environments.

The LFB operates a fire setters intervention scheme focused on education and early intervention.

A quarter of all deliberate fire incidents involve individuals under the age of 18.

Over 90% of those referred to the scheme reportedly do not reoffend.

The Fire Committee also heard calls for better integration of insurance and emergency data.

There was discussion about the potential for a national arson prevention mechanism.

Mental health, community support, and social media influences were also raised during the session.

Watch the discussion below

Smoke alarms failing in thousands of UK homes annually

by Featured NewsFire DetectionResearch

Government data shows widespread failures in home smoke alarms

Over 12,000 residential fires occur each year in the UK in homes without smoke alarms, according to Safety Group.

The organisation cited government data indicating that more than 470 people have died since 2019 in house fires where no alarm was present or the alarm failed to function.

According to the same data, smoke alarms only activated in 36 per cent of house fires, with many failing to sound due to battery or maintenance issues.

Safety Group said the findings reveal a gap between reported alarm ownership and actual alarm functionality.

The data show that while around 90 per cent of homes report having smoke alarms, only 70 to 75 per cent of these are working.

Alarms fail due to age, poor maintenance or incorrect placement

Safety Group UK reported that many UK homes are equipped with outdated or poorly maintained smoke alarms.

The organisation explained that smoke alarms generally have a lifespan of about 10 years, after which their effectiveness declines.

It recommended checking the manufacture date and replacing alarms that are close to or past their expected lifespan.

Safety Group added that devices may also fail to work due to dust or insect obstruction, flat smoke alarm batteries, or incorrect installation location.

It recommended placing alarms on ceilings away from fixtures and testing units monthly.

Interconnected alarms can provide early alerts across properties

Safety Group UK advised upgrading to interconnected smoke alarm systems.

These systems are designed to trigger all alarms in the home simultaneously when one detects smoke.

The company stated that this can provide additional seconds for safe evacuation, particularly in multi-level homes.

According to the organisation, both wired and wireless models are available, with wireless systems offering easier retrofitting for existing homes.

Some newer systems can also alert residents through mobile phone notifications.

Fire services advise regular testing and evacuation planning

Fire England recommends testing all smoke alarms every month by pressing the test button for a few seconds.

Safety Group UK supported this advice and suggested making testing a regular household activity.

The organisation also stressed the importance of replacing batteries annually and keeping spare batteries dedicated to alarms only.

In addition, it encouraged households to develop clear escape plans, including two exits per room and support roles for residents with additional needs.

Smoke alarms fail to operate in 12,000 UK house fires annually: Summary

Government data show that over 12,000 house fires occur each year in homes without smoke alarms.

Since 2019, 471 people have died in fires where alarms were absent or failed.

Only 36 per cent of smoke alarms triggered during a fire.

Around 90 per cent of UK homes report having alarms installed.

Only 70 to 75 per cent of these alarms are in working order.

Common issues include flat batteries, poor maintenance, and incorrect placement.

Smoke alarms have a lifespan of around 10 years.

Safety Group UK recommends regular testing and annual battery changes.

Interconnected alarms can improve early warning across a property.

Fire England advises testing alarms monthly and preparing a fire escape plan.

Fire alarm guidance released for UK school lockdown use

by Associations and OrganisationsFire DetectionResearchSafetyTraining

Fire alarm systems may support both evacuation and invacuation procedures

The Fire Industry Association (FIA) has published updated guidance on using fire alarm systems to support lockdown and invacuation alerts in schools.

According to the FIA, the guidance responds to increasing interest in adapting fire detection and alarm systems for use during non-fire emergencies, including security incidents and chemical threats.

The note outlines key considerations for implementing this dual use, referring to British Standard BS 5839-1:2025 for compliance requirements.

The FIA stated that many public buildings, particularly schools, are assessing how their current alarm infrastructure can be extended to address a broader range of risks.

BS 5839-1:2025 guidance on dual alarm functionality

The guidance references Clause 5a of BS 5839-1:2025, which states that alarm systems linked to hazards other than fire must be clearly differentiated and coordinated.

The FIA explained that this requirement applies when a single fire alarm system is also used to signal lockdown alerts, which must sound different from standard fire evacuation signals.

It added that systems must be designed to prevent conflicting messages, especially in cases where different emergencies occur at the same time.

The FIA noted that in certain scenarios, such as a violent intruder on school grounds, invacuation may be given higher operational priority than evacuation.

Benefits and limitations of using fire alarm systems for lockdown

The guidance outlines several practical advantages for schools considering this dual-function use.

The FIA stated that combining lockdown alerts with existing fire alarm infrastructure can be more cost-effective than installing separate systems.

It also pointed out that fire detection and alarm systems are typically engineered for high reliability and site-wide coverage, making them suitable for time-sensitive alerts.

However, it cautioned that any adaptation must be supported by a building-specific risk assessment, technical planning, and collaboration with emergency services and installers.

Key operational considerations for schools

The FIA advised that any decision to use fire alarm systems for lockdown purposes should involve clear planning and consultation with relevant stakeholders.

It stressed that distinct alarm tones must be agreed upon and easily recognisable to avoid confusion between evacuation and lockdown instructions.

The organisation also recommended establishing procedures to manage simultaneous or conflicting emergency alerts, especially where multiple risks are present.

It emphasised the importance of ensuring that all staff understand the protocols and that decisions about alarm hierarchy are documented and agreed in advance.

Fire alarm guidance released for UK school lockdown use: Summary

The Fire Industry Association released updated guidance on 3 June 2025.

The guidance addresses using fire alarm systems for lockdown and invacuation alerts in schools.

It refers to BS 5839-1:2025 Clause 5a, which requires alarms to be distinct and coordinated.

The FIA stated that many schools are exploring this dual use due to rising safety concerns.

It noted that combining functions may reduce costs and improve system reliability.

It cautioned that lockdown alarms must be clearly differentiated from fire alarms.

The organisation said a full risk assessment must guide implementation.

It recommended stakeholder collaboration to ensure clarity and compliance.

It stated that some scenarios may prioritise invacuation over evacuation.

The FIA advised that building-specific protocols should be developed.

It concluded that schools must prepare operational responses to overlapping emergencies.

France establishes joint fire resistance research lab for aircraft safety

by Featured NewsFire EngineeringResearch

Safran collaborates with French institutions on fire resistance research

Safran Group has announced the launch of a joint research laboratory in France focused on fire resistance in aerospace engineering.

According to Safran, the new facility – called Flames (Fire Laboratory for Assembly, Metal and Composite Engineering & Safety) – is a partnership between Safran Nacelles, the Insa Rouen Normandie, the University of Rouen Normandie and the CNRS.

The four-year initiative aims to support future developments in aircraft nacelle design by improving knowledge in fire resistance and related safety technologies.

Laboratory supports development of future nacelle systems

Safran stated that the research carried out at Flames will feed into the early stages of nacelle system development.

It explained that the programme is designed to anticipate changes in regulatory and technical requirements, with the findings intended to enhance fire protection measures in aircraft design.

Safran Nacelles, which leads the nacelle design and integration activities within the Safran Group, will use results from the Flames laboratory to inform its upcoming engineering work.

Research hosted in specialist university laboratories

The Flames laboratory is based within two facilities – the Materials Physics Group (GPM) and the Interprofessional Research Complex in Aerothermochemistry (Coria) – which operate under joint supervision by CNRS, the University of Rouen Normandie and Insa Rouen Normandie.

The laboratory is equipped to carry out full test campaigns using representative samples and will support the development of simulation models and optimised physical testing processes.

Fabienne Lacorre, Technical Director at Safran Nacelles, said: “This partnership with the Insa Rouen Normandie will enable us to work on complex problems, combining Safran Nacelles’ technical and industrial expertise with the academic excellence of the teams at the GPM and Coria laboratories.

“Flames strengthens our ability to innovate and meet tomorrow’s technical challenges.”

Collaboration includes engineers and researchers

The Flames team includes engineers from Safran Nacelles, researchers from CNRS, and teacher-researchers from the Insa Rouen Normandie and the University of Rouen Normandie.

Safran confirmed that Insa Rouen Normandie will also recruit one engineer and one teacher-researcher to enhance the team’s capabilities.

Mourad Boukhalfa, Director of the Insa Rouen Normandie, said:

“We are delighted that the work carried out in simulation and experimentation on combustion in turbojet engines has been extended to new areas, in particular the behaviour of innovative materials subjected to extreme thermal conditions in the aeronautical industry.

“This collaboration involves two research laboratories of excellence, Coria and the GPM, both co-founders of the Labex EMC3 and the Institut Carnot ESP, alongside Safran Nacelles, a leading industrial player.”

France establishes joint fire resistance research lab for aircraft safety: Summary

Safran Group has launched a fire resistance research laboratory in France.

The project is a partnership with the Insa Rouen Normandie, the University of Rouen Normandie and the CNRS.

The laboratory is named Flames, standing for Fire Laboratory for Assembly, Metal and Composite Engineering & Safety.

It will run for four years.

The aim is to improve fire resistance understanding for aircraft nacelle development.

The research will support early-stage aerospace engineering and regulation compliance.

Flames is based at GPM and Coria, two laboratories under CNRS and local university supervision.

Testing capabilities will enable physical and simulated fire resistance assessments.

Safran Nacelles engineers will work alongside university researchers.

Two new staff will be hired by Insa Rouen Normandie to expand the team.

Findings will feed directly into future Safran Nacelles designs.

The programme contributes to aerospace fire safety research in France.

Fire blankets may pose explosion risk during electric vehicle fires, warns NFPA and UL

by ActiveFeatured NewsResearchSafety

Research finds fire blankets may trap explosive gases during battery fires

The NFPA and UL Research Institutes have reported that using fire blankets during electric vehicle fires with battery involvement may increase explosion risk.

According to a joint notice from the Fire Protection Research Foundation (FPRF) and the Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI), fire blankets can eliminate open flames but may trap flammable gases underneath.

The notice warned that gases accumulating beneath the blanket during battery thermal runaway could ignite explosively if oxygen is reintroduced.

Fire blankets linked to confined gas build-up in experiments

The FPRF reported that during controlled testing, fire blankets used to cover burning electric vehicles succeeded in cutting off flames by limiting oxygen flow.

However, battery thermal runaway continued even after the flames were extinguished, releasing flammable gases into the space beneath the blanket.

The Foundation stated that in some trials, this created an explosion hazard for nearby responders when the confined gases mixed with fresh air.

Four suppression methods assessed in current FPRF project

The FPRF is analysing firefighting strategies through its ongoing research project titled Assessment of EV Firefighting Tactics, Tools and the Impact on Stranded Energy.

The Foundation explained that recent testing compared the use of standard hose streams (with and without added agents), fire blankets, and firefighting appliances on electric vehicle fires.

Preliminary findings will be presented at the NFPA Conference & Expo on 16 June 2025 in Las Vegas, and full results will be published later this year at nfpa.org/foundation.

FSRI conducting parallel studies on EV fire suppression

The FSRI is independently studying battery fire hazards and suppression techniques under its Fire Safety of Batteries and Electric Vehicles programme.

According to the Institute, it is evaluating hose streams, under-vehicle water nozzles, and fire blankets as control measures in confirmed battery pack fire incidents.

The FSRI stated that analysis of video footage and performance data is ongoing, with findings to be released later in 2025 at fsri.org.

Focus remains on firefighter safety during EV incidents

The FPRF said that its research aims to support safer incident response procedures for EV fires by identifying effective tactics and understanding the risks of re-ignition and gas build-up.

The FSRI added that its work is directed at enabling better control strategies and reducing hazards for emergency responders.

Both organisations emphasised that no suppression method is without risk, and current findings should inform future training and operational guidance.

NFPA warns of fire blanket hazard in EV fire suppression: Summary

The NFPA reported that fire blankets used during electric vehicle battery fires may pose an explosion risk.

This risk arises from the accumulation of unburned flammable gases beneath the blanket.

The Fire Protection Research Foundation and the Fire Safety Research Institute issued a joint notice on 2 June 2025.

They warned that introducing air into this gas buildup could cause ignition.

The warning is based on ongoing research into EV firefighting tactics and suppression tools.

The FPRF tested four approaches: hose streams with and without additives, fire blankets, and firefighting appliances.

Preliminary results will be presented at the NFPA Conference & Expo in Las Vegas on 16 June 2025.

A full report will follow in autumn 2025 at nfpa.org/foundation.

The FSRI is conducting separate experiments under its own battery safety research project.

Its tests included standard and under-vehicle water application and fire blankets.

The FSRI will publish its findings later in 2025 at fsri.org.

Both organisations aim to improve responder safety and inform tactical decisions.

Saudi Arabia wildfire study proposes forest protection measures

by Breaking NewsResearchWildland Fire

NCVC study assesses wildfire risks and response options

The National Center for Vegetation Cover Development and Combating Desertification (NCVC) has published a wildfire study focusing on southern and southwestern Saudi Arabia.

According to NCVC, the study outlines current forest conditions, examines wildfire risks and recommends mitigation measures.

The study was developed with King Khalid University and Monash University, Australia.

NCVC reported that it includes the creation of a digital database, preventive strategies, and analysis of contributing community behaviours.

Use of early warning systems and drones proposed

NCVC explained that the study proposes the use of early warning systems, remote sensing and drones as part of an integrated prevention and response strategy.

The study recommends establishing clearly defined roles for official agencies, alongside a joint operations centre to coordinate response.

The organisation stated that these measures aim to improve wildfire detection and containment while supporting ecosystem protection efforts.

New framework for firebreaks and post-fire recovery

The centre confirmed that the study includes guidance for post-fire land rehabilitation, tools to evaluate response performance, and technical field designs for firebreaks.

It stated that these proposed designs use sustainable alternatives suited to Saudi Arabia’s forest environments.

A key recommendation is the development of a national guide for restoring affected areas after wildfire events.

Community volunteers to support wildfire prevention

The NCVC stated that the study includes a mechanism to engage community and volunteer teams in wildfire prevention.

This includes training, capacity-building, and integration with official response operations.

It noted that involving local residents is seen as critical to strengthening protection and early intervention capacity in forested areas.

National forest strategy and tree planting initiative

NCVC confirmed that the study forms part of broader national efforts aligned with Article 6 of the Executive Regulation for Vegetation Cover Development and Combating Desertification.

The organisation said this includes developing a sustainable forest management plan and regulating grazing in forest areas.

It added that the centre has launched a programme to grow 60 million trees and rehabilitate 300,000 hectares by 2030.

Saudi Arabia wildfire study proposes forest protection measures: Summary

The National Center for Vegetation Cover Development and Combating Desertification has completed a wildfire study in southern and southwestern Saudi Arabia.

The study was conducted with King Khalid University and Monash University.

It includes an assessment of forest conditions and fire risk factors.

It proposes preventive measures including early warning systems and drone technology.

A digital database and integrated response plan have been developed.

The plan outlines roles for official agencies and recommends a joint operations centre.

Field designs for firebreaks and a recovery guide are included.

A performance evaluation tool and community engagement strategy are proposed.

The study includes a volunteer training and coordination mechanism.

The NCVC said the study supports its broader forest protection goals.

The centre aims to plant 60 million trees and rehabilitate 300,000 hectares by 2030.

It works under Article 6 of the Executive Regulation for forest development.

This includes managing grazing and implementing a national forest strategy.

Multitone highlights role of technical author in new communications project

by CommunicationsFeatured NewsResearch

The role of documentation in Multitone’s Nucleus solution

Multitone has highlighted the contribution of Junior Technical Author Elizabeth Dark to the development of its critical communication system, Multitone Nucleus.

Elizabeth joined the UK-based company in February 2024 and has been involved in preparing documentation for the Nucleus system, which launched in spring 2025.

Her work focuses on writing and maintaining clear documentation for customers and internal teams.

Elizabeth said her role centres on communicating technical content in an accessible way.

She said attending site visits helps ensure documents are relevant to real-world use.

Elizabeth added that internal teams have expressed interest in more video guides to support training.

Developing adaptable communications for critical industries

Multitone described the Nucleus system as modular and customisable, with a design that allows different users to interact with it efficiently.

Elizabeth explained: “Multitone Nucleus is a communication management system intended for critical industries. This product delivers next-level customisability and adapts to a wide range of communication needs, while maintaining a design that users can easily use and understand.”

She continued: “This product succeeded because we approached its development differently in several key ways.

“In particular, the modularity of adding optional features, and extra effort in the user interface design have streamlined use and setup for everyone.

“Put simply, this product is straightforward and ‘to the point’ so that users waste no time sending out critical messages and alerts, while still allowing customisable flexibility to make it a perfect fit for all sorts of industries and users.”

Assessing the limitations and usefulness of AI in technical writing

Elizabeth said artificial intelligence tools can support general understanding of new subject matter, but are not a substitute for manual research and collaboration with product teams.

She said: “AI can be useful for some aspects of documentation work, but most of my work is that of a communicator rather than a copywriter.

“AI relies on its previous exposure, so when working with internal-only documents or brand-new products – especially hardware – it’s often more effective for me to use my own skills to gather notes, engage with product experts and other resources, create diagrams and images, develop document structures, and produce videos.

“Especially for such critical and lifesaving information, I am not comfortable relying on AI too much in this context.

Elizabeth added: “As someone who is still relatively new to this industry, AI can help me quickly grasp unfamiliar concepts in a general way by elaborating on things in a sort of ‘custom’ context.

“There are many existing ways to introduce automation techniques into documentation, such as investing in structured/xml style authoring.

“This can be used to increase efficiency, organisation, and to keep all relevant documents up to date at once without compromising on accuracy or human led information control.

“This change would require overhauling the process significantly and making a substantial financial investment.”

Improving critical incident response and future communication applications

Multitone stated that its MAJAX function, which is designed to send major incident alerts and visualise response data, is one of its key solutions.

Elizabeth said: “All Multitone products help save lives. What could be more exciting and motivating?

“My personal favourite is the MAJAX – Major Incidents feature.

“MAJAX is capable of sending out major incident alerts to large quantities of personnel and teams all at once and using data visualisations to convey essential response data back to the system operator.

“People use this in situations such as large traffic emergencies, terrorist events, and hospitals.

“The introduction of this feature streamlined emergency interventions for large emergencies exponentially.”

She also commented on the importance of maintaining security as technologies evolve.

She said: “Mismanaged security and targeted attacks in these sectors could be completely disastrous, so security must be at the forefront of our attention for every product.

“I am interested in exploring how we can protect encryption against quantum computing risks and how we can continue building and maintaining customers’ trust in cloud storage solutions.”

Elizabeth also said she would like to see further development of communications solutions for home care.

She said: “Being able to improve care communications outside of hospitals would help to give patients some independence back and improve the continuity of care.”

Multitone’s technical author supports clarity in critical communication projects: Summary

Multitone Electronics reported that Elizabeth Dark joined the company in February 2024 as Junior Technical Author.

Elizabeth creates technical documentation for Multitone’s communication solutions, including the Nucleus system.

The Nucleus system launched in spring 2025 and is designed for use in critical industries.

Multitone described the system as modular and customisable.

Elizabeth said her role involves communicating information clearly to external and internal users.

She said video guides are in demand across teams.

Elizabeth said the design of the Nucleus system supports efficiency and adaptability.

She said AI can help with general understanding, but not with internal or hardware-specific documentation.

Elizabeth added that structured authoring tools may support future efficiency but require major changes and investment.

She said her preferred Multitone feature is MAJAX, used for alerting and response in large emergencies.

She highlighted the importance of strong security in critical communication systems.

Elizabeth said she would like to see more communication tools developed for home care settings.

Snacking at work linked to weight issues among firefighters

by Featured NewsHealth and SafetyResearch

Firefighters in the UK face workplace health challenge

A recent study conducted by Oxford Online Pharmacy has found that firefighters are among the professions in the UK where workplace snacking is considered a major obstacle to weight loss.

The survey, conducted in April 2025 by Censuswide and based on responses from 2,000 UK adults, explored how job roles influence eating habits.

According to Oxford Online Pharmacy, 33.33% of firefighters surveyed said workplace snacks were a barrier to weight management.

The company said estate and letting agents reported the highest rate, with 37.5% citing vending machines and workplace snacks as a factor in weight gain.

Survey examines health barriers in the workplace

Oxford Online Pharmacy stated that broadcasters were tied with firefighters at 33.33% in reporting workplace snacks as a problem.

The study also noted that 26.67% of lorry and taxi drivers blamed eating on the job for difficulties with weight loss.

According to the company, these jobs often involve mobile routines and high workloads that limit access to home-cooked meals.

Oxford Online Pharmacy explained that these types of professions frequently operate in high-pressure environments with limited opportunities for food preparation, making quick snacks a more accessible option.

Lack of time and stress contribute to poor diet choices

Oxford Online Pharmacy found that lack of time to cook and workplace stress were additional factors affecting food choices. It reported that people working in mobile or shift-based roles were more likely to experience these barriers.

The company said that stress and limited time can drive workers to rely on fast food and vending machines, which are often calorie-dense and lacking in nutrition.

It added that stress-related eating patterns can lead to overconsumption, especially when healthier alternatives are unavailable during working hours.

Guidance issued for employers and employees

Kiran Jones, Clinical Pharmacist at Oxford Online Pharmacy, provided advice for workers and employers to support healthier choices. Jones said: “If grab-and-go and fast-food options are stopping you from eating healthy and nutritious lunches or snacks, it’s time you took back control and packed your own.”

Jones continued: “Instead of relying on quick, unhealthy options, consider packing a lunchbox filled with lean proteins and fruits and vegetables, as well as plenty of nutritious snacks.”

Jones added: “Soups in thermos flasks are also perfect for weight loss if you prefer a hot meal or avoid food wastage by boxing up last night’s leftovers.”

For employers, Jones said: “While you can’t necessarily control what workers eat when they’re on the road, you can switch up the food that’s available in the workplace.”

Jones stated: “Encourage workers to set their own break times where they can eat in peace between jobs.

“Rushing or skipping meals can result in poor food choices later in the day and irregular eating patterns can have an impact on mood and energy levels.”

Jones further recommended: “Workplaces should also ensure employees are aware of any support services that are available to them in and outside of the workplace, for their mental or physical health.”

Workplace snacking challenges for firefighters and other UK workers: Summary

Oxford Online Pharmacy conducted a UK-wide survey of 2,000 adults in April 2025.

The research examined barriers to weight loss and healthy eating in the workplace.

It found that 33.33% of firefighters considered workplace snacking a challenge to weight control.

Estate and letting agents had the highest rate, at 37.5%.

Broadcasters also reported 33.33%, and 26.67% of taxi and lorry drivers identified on-the-job eating as a problem.

Oxford Online Pharmacy stated that stress and limited food preparation time contributed to poor diet choices.

Kiran Jones, Clinical Pharmacist at Oxford Online Pharmacy, shared advice for healthy eating on the job.

Suggestions included pre-planning meals, increasing water intake and changing available snack options.

Jones also encouraged flexible break times and access to workplace wellbeing resources.

UK lithium-ion battery fires rise 93% in two years

by Featured NewsResearchSafety

Surge in lithium-ion battery fires linked to e-bikes and EVs

UK fire brigades are now responding to more than three lithium-ion battery fires each day, according to QBE.

QBE reported a 93% increase in lithium-ion battery fires between 2022 and 2024 based on Freedom of Information data collected in March 2025.

The insurance company recorded 1,330 lithium-ion battery fires in 2024, up from 690 in 2022.

London accounts for highest number of battery fires

London Fire Brigade responded to 407 lithium-ion battery fires in 2024, which QBE stated was more than four times the next highest region.

Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service reported 100 battery fires in the same year, while West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service recorded 94.

According to QBE, London also accounted for 49% of all e-bike fires nationally.

E-bike fires double over two-year period

QBE reported that electric bikes were linked to 362 fire incidents in 2024, doubling from 181 in 2022.

The insurer said e-bikes accounted for 27% of all lithium-ion battery fires in 2024.

Adrian Simmonds, practice leader for property risk solutions at QBE Insurance, said:
“Lithium-ion battery fires continue increasing at a worrying pace.

“These fires burn differently, they take longer to tackle, typically need ten times more water to put out and are often more harmful to the surrounding environment.

“People need to understand the risks and how to deal with them.”

Regulation and public awareness called for by QBE

QBE said more education is needed to ensure the public understands safe charging, use and disposal practices.

Simmonds added:
“While QBE supports the adoption of e-transport, we also call for stricter regulation.

“For instance, the UK should stop the sale of rogue e-bikes and other unregulated devices. This could be done in the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill, which is going through Parliament.

“In the meantime, consumers should purchase e-bikes and e-scooters from reputable companies, so retailers that show they take quality and compliance seriously with a genuine CE mark.

“Raising awareness around safe charging, use and disposal of lithium-ion batteries is critical to keeping people and property safe.”

Residential buildings most affected by battery fires

QBE stated that residential properties were the most common locations for lithium-ion battery fires.

Other frequently recorded settings were outdoor spaces and commercial buildings.

The insurer said fires involving electric scooters rose by 32% between 2022 and 2024, while electric mobility scooter fires rose by 20% during the same period.

Fires involving electric vehicles rose by 77%, reaching 232 incidents in 2024.

According to QBE, although the number of EVs has more than doubled since 2022, the fire risk remains high due to thermal runaway effects.

UK lithium-ion battery fires rise 93% in two years: Summary

UK fire brigades attended 1,330 lithium-ion battery fires in 2024.

This represents a 93% increase from 2022, according to QBE.

The findings are based on data gathered from Freedom of Information requests to UK fire services.

E-bikes were linked to 362 fires in 2024, double the 2022 figure.

London accounted for 31% of total lithium-ion battery fires.

London also accounted for 49% of all e-bike fires.

Electric vehicle fires increased by 77% between 2022 and 2024.

The most common fire locations were residential properties.

QBE urged stronger regulation and public education on battery safety.

It cited thermal runaway as the key fire risk mechanism.

The Product Regulation and Metrology Bill is under parliamentary review.

The Department for Business and Trade launched the Buy Safe, Be Safe campaign in 2024.

QBE recommended specific safety steps for homes and businesses using lithium-ion batteries.