Gavin Skelly, Chief Executive of Fire Aware, has urged a cultural shift in the fire sector to improve safety standards in the built environment.
Is Gen Z the missing piece in solving the UK construction skills gap?
Industry facing shortage of workers
PlanRadar has reported that the UK construction industry is confronting a major skills gap, with more than 140,000 vacancies unfilled.
The company said this shortage is compounded by the fact that many experienced workers are approaching retirement age.
It explained that the traditional method of meeting demand by simply recruiting more people will not be enough to address the issue.
According to PlanRadar, new strategies will be required to secure the future workforce and ensure industry growth.
Rob Norton, UK Director at PlanRadar, said: “The construction industry faces a fundamental challenge: a signification talent void, with over 140,000 vacancies.
“This issue is compounded by a workforce that’s rapidly approaching retirement.
“The old playbook of simply ‘finding more people’ is no longer sufficient; the real solution will require a different approach.”
Gen Z as a digital solution
PlanRadar stated that younger generations, especially Gen Z, will play a key role in addressing the skills gap.
The company commented that Gen Z is recognised as the most digitally fluent generation to date and has a strong preference for meaningful work.
It added that these qualities make them well suited to help drive digital transformation within the sector.
Norton said: “Gen Z, the most digitally fluent generation in history, holds the key.
“Their ease with technology and desire for purposeful work can drive the digital transformation our sector needs.
“It is our responsibility to show today’s students, especially those checking their newly published GCSE results, that construction is a place where their digital skills are valued.”
Importance of training existing staff
PlanRadar noted that upskilling the existing workforce is also a priority.
The company indicated that digital tools in construction are becoming increasingly accessible, with user interfaces comparable to widely used consumer apps.
It said that empowering older workers to adopt these tools can improve efficiency and collaboration across all age groups.
Norton added: “While this generation’s digital fluency is a huge asset, it’s also true that we need to upskill our entire workforce.
“The good news is that using modern, digital construction tools is often as simple as using apps we already know, like WhatsApp.
“It’s about empowering everyone to work more efficiently and collaboratively, regardless of age.”
Digital future of construction
PlanRadar explained that the sector’s long-term stability depends on adopting digital working methods.
It said this requires industry-wide cooperation to align recruitment, training, and operational practices with technological change.
The organisation stressed that preparing both current and future employees to work with digital tools is essential.
Norton said: “We must embrace change and welcome the next generation of builders.
“The future of construction is digital, and we need to work together to build it.”
Timing linked to GCSE results
PlanRadar connected this message with the release of GCSE results in the UK.
It explained that this moment is an opportunity to highlight career paths in construction to young people who are considering future options.
The organisation stated that showing students how digital skills are valued in construction can help attract new entrants to the industry.
It added that engaging with students at this stage will be important to reduce the impact of the skills gap.
Addressing skills gaps in passive fire protection: UK report outlines recommendations
Passive fire protection in the UK faces workforce, training, and awareness challenges
According to the final report published by the PFP Skills Group, the passive fire protection (PFP) sector in the United Kingdom is facing a series of structural issues related to workforce development, qualifications, and training consistency.
The report details findings from an extensive review of the sector and offers 14 recommendations to improve recruitment, upskilling, and professional standards.
The PFP Skills Group comprises over 60 organisations, including trade associations, employers, training providers, and government representatives.
The report was commissioned following concerns raised by industry professionals, regulators, and the Grenfell Tower Inquiry about the competency of individuals working in life-critical PFP roles.
The group’s work was supported by the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) and facilitated by the Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP).
Workforce shortages and recruitment barriers
A key issue highlighted in the report is the lack of new entrants into the PFP sector.
The group found that the workforce is ageing and often relies on informal routes into employment.
Few structured pathways exist for young people or career changers to enter the sector.
This has contributed to a shortage of qualified professionals, particularly in inspection and installation roles.
Employers report difficulties in finding suitably trained workers, and limited public understanding of PFP has affected recruitment.
The sector is also underrepresented in broader construction careers materials, reducing its visibility among school leavers and jobseekers.
The report recommends launching a campaign to raise awareness of PFP careers and creating more direct training and qualification routes.
It also suggests building closer links between industry and education providers to improve progression into the sector.
Training provision lacks standardisation
The report identifies inconsistencies in how PFP training is delivered and assessed.
While multiple training providers offer courses, there is no central oversight to ensure alignment with sector needs or national qualification frameworks.
Some courses lack clear quality benchmarks or are not formally accredited.
This creates confusion for employers and learners, and can result in competency gaps among workers.
The group calls for a clearer framework for PFP qualifications and urges training providers to align their content with industry-recognised standards.
Among the recommendations are the development of new apprenticeship standards and modular training pathways covering the full range of PFP disciplines.
The report also encourages the use of digital learning tools and remote access training to improve accessibility.
Competency and regulatory alignment
Concerns about the competency of those working in PFP were raised during the Grenfell Inquiry and remain a central issue for the sector.
The report outlines how the absence of defined competency criteria has led to variability in inspection, design, and installation quality.
The report recommends that government and industry collaborate to define competency criteria for all PFP roles, aligned with the UK’s wider building safety reforms and the new Building Safety Regulator’s requirements.
This would support the professionalisation of the sector and ensure a common baseline of knowledge and skills.
The group also highlights the need for improved guidance and technical documentation.
This includes the development of best practice materials to support on-site decision-making and reduce reliance on informal or anecdotal approaches.
Strategic coordination and governance
Throughout the report, the group identifies a lack of sector-wide coordination as a barrier to addressing skills issues.
Multiple organisations have responsibility for training, qualifications, and promotion, but there is no single body overseeing development across the UK.
To address this, the group proposes the establishment of a formal PFP Skills Group to oversee implementation of the report’s recommendations.
This would include representatives from trade bodies, employers, government, and training providers.
A central part of the group’s role would be to track progress against the 14 recommendations and ensure alignment with wider construction skills initiatives.
The report also suggests securing longer-term funding and engagement with devolved administrations to deliver consistency across the UK.
Summary of recommendations
The PFP Skills Final Report includes the following recommendations:
- Raise public and professional awareness of passive fire protection as a career.
- Improve pathways into the sector for school leavers and career changers.
- Establish a framework of qualifications and modular learning options.
- Expand and formalise apprenticeship standards in PFP disciplines.
- Align all training provision to agreed sector competencies.
- Develop digital training content to improve access and flexibility.
- Improve training materials and sector guidance on best practice.
- Establish and maintain a competency framework for PFP roles.
- Introduce clear job role definitions and expectations across the sector.
- Promote the uptake of third-party certification for training providers.
- Develop an accreditation system for qualifications and courses.
- Establish a new PFP Skills Group to oversee implementation.
- Secure sustained funding and industry support for skills development.
- Ensure policy alignment with wider construction and building safety reforms.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The construction skills gap has direct implications for fire and safety professionals, as workforce shortages may delay project timelines and compliance efforts.
Upskilling employees on digital tools can support more accurate tracking of fire safety requirements during construction.
Engaging younger workers could ensure that future fire safety standards are met consistently in a digital-first environment.
Industry-wide collaboration between construction and fire safety professionals will be necessary to strengthen compliance while addressing the workforce gap.
UK construction faces urgent skills gap challenge: Summary
PlanRadar reported that the UK construction industry has more than 140,000 vacancies.
It said many experienced workers are approaching retirement.
It explained that recruitment alone will not address the shortage.
PlanRadar stated that Gen Z’s digital fluency offers a solution.
It said younger workers want purposeful careers and are comfortable with technology.
It added that their skills can support digital transformation.
PlanRadar noted that existing staff must also be trained in digital tools.
It stated that these systems are comparable to apps like WhatsApp.
It explained that adoption can improve efficiency and collaboration.
The organisation said the industry must embrace digital change.
It linked the message to the release of GCSE results.
It said students should be shown that their skills are valued.
It explained that promoting digital careers could reduce the skills gap.
PlanRadar stated that collaboration will be needed to secure the future workforce.
It added that the future of construction is digital.
Passive fire protection and structural movement in UK buildings
Movement challenges in passive fire protection
The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has reported on the need for greater focus on how building movement affects passive fire protection systems in the UK.
According to ASFP, structural movement can occur for several reasons, including dynamic loads, environmental pressures, material-specific behaviour, and thermal expansion during fire events.
It explained that these movements create risks for the long-term performance of firestopping systems, particularly where rigid materials are used around services or wall heads.
The body highlighted two types of movement: deflection, which is the displacement of structural elements such as slabs and partitions, and service movement, where cables, pipes, or ducts supported by soffits move and strain fire seals.
While products are available to address wall head deflection, ASFP noted that movement at service penetrations remains underrepresented in both testing and design standards.
Limitations in current UK guidance
ASFP reported that UK guidance such as Approved Document B does reference deflection movement but provides limited clarity.
The organisation explained that a nominal figure of 40mm is often used, but this is sometimes misunderstood.
It stated that the figure reflects an upper limit between unsupported elements and is not suitable as a blanket requirement across all building types or details.
ASFP added that misapplication of this value in design and installation can lead to incompatible or untestable solutions.
The association advised that further clarity is required in standards and practice to prevent overestimation or misinterpretation of movement allowances.
Testing service penetrations under movement
ASFP outlined that current fire test standards, such as BS EN 1366-3 for service penetrations, do not address service movement during fire exposure.
It explained that although BS EN 1366-4 Annex B includes a methodology for joint seal movement testing, there is little guidance on how services shifting within a sealed aperture behave in a fire.
To address this gap, Nullifire worked with Warringtonfire to create a hydraulic test rig that simulates wall movement before fire exposure.
ASFP said that the method, known as the “bouncy wall test”, aimed to replicate real-world conditions by applying stress before ignition.
The association noted that the test challenges the rigidity of current standards by reflecting the reality of long-term building use before any fire occurs.
Unrealistic movement requirements in design briefs
ASFP commented that design briefs sometimes request movement allowances of ±25mm to ±100mm, which it described as unrealistic.
It reported that movement of this scale would suggest structural deflection beyond acceptable performance.
The organisation explained that these figures can be carried forward unchallenged from early design through to procurement, resulting in unsuitable specifications.
It advised that accurate analysis of structural behaviour is needed to avoid arbitrary or excessive values being applied.
The group stated that heat maps and structural load analysis may be useful tools for setting more realistic allowances.
The role of education and engagement
ASFP emphasised the importance of early engagement between designers, specifiers, and contractors in understanding structural behaviour and passive fire protection performance.
It reported that greater awareness of material behaviour and mechanical support can help improve detailing at penetrations and deflection heads.
The association noted that training and technical dialogue are essential to prevent fire safety gaps arising from misunderstanding structural movement.
It stated that manufacturers and engineers should provide evidence-based clarity to support compliant solutions rather than rely on assumptions.
The body added that this work forms part of a wider industry effort to improve standards and testing for long-term building safety.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
For fire and safety professionals, the ASFP’s report highlights the need to consider service and deflection movement as part of passive fire protection design.
The focus on movement testing methods shows how real-world performance may differ from laboratory results.
Understanding structural behaviour helps prevent failures in firestopping systems over time.
Professionals involved in design, specification, and installation may need to engage more closely with engineers and manufacturers to align expectations with realistic structural allowances.
Passive fire protection and structural movement in UK buildings: Summary
The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) reported on movement in passive fire protection.
ASFP said structural movement occurs due to loads, environmental factors, material behaviour, and thermal expansion.
It stated that this movement threatens firestop system integrity at wall heads and service penetrations.
The group said Approved Document B provides vague guidance with a nominal 40mm allowance that is often misapplied.
It reported that BS EN 1366-3 does not address service movement and BS EN 1366-4 Annex B gives limited methodology.
Nullifire and Warringtonfire developed a “bouncy wall test” to simulate real conditions.
The group said some design briefs request unrealistic allowances of ±25mm to ±100mm.
ASFP advised using structural analysis and heat maps for realistic allowances.
It said education and early engagement are necessary to improve fire safety.
The association stated that manufacturers and engineers must provide compliant, evidence-based solutions.
Bull Products to exhibit at UK Construction Week 2025
Bull Products confirms debut at Birmingham event
Bull Products has announced it will be exhibiting at UK Construction Week Birmingham for the first time.
According to Bull Products, the company will be at stand D112 from 30 September to 2 October 2025.
It said the stand will showcase safety systems designed for the construction sector and related applications.
The company added that its Fire 360° service will be a central focus, along with its SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+ alarm and detection systems.
Fire 360° service and carbon reduction focus
Bull Products reported that its Fire 360° service is designed as a complete compliance solution.
The company explained that the service covers design, installation, commissioning and maintenance across sites of different sizes in the UK.
It added that Fire 360° also includes asset collection, storage, cleaning and inspection, preparing equipment for reuse on future projects.
According to Bull Products, Fire 360° supports the Green Bull initiative by helping customers address carbon reduction requirements while maintaining site efficiency.
SITENET fire detection and alarm system
Bull Products stated that SITENET will be featured at the event as part of its system range.
The company explained that SITENET is a fully EN 54 certified wireless intelligent fire detection and alarm system.
It added that SITENET can link up to 511 devices from one panel across 32 zones.
The system uses radio devices and wireless mesh technology with network redundancy and channel hopping, the company said.
It reported that SITENET meets JCoP and HSG168 compliance requirements and can be used in both internal and external environments.
SITEPROTECT system applications
Bull Products confirmed that SITEPROTECT will also be on display.
The organisation stated that SITEPROTECT is a temporary wireless mesh fire detection and alarm system designed for the construction industry.
It explained that SITEPROTECT supports up to 480 devices across 15 zones using EN 54-5 and EN 54-7 certified detector heads.
The system also incorporates wireless emergency fire, first aid, intruder and lockdown alarms.
The company added that the lockdown alarm has been developed primarily for the education sector but can also be deployed in public settings such as shopping centres.
SITEEVAC+ system for cost-sensitive projects
Bull Products noted that SITEEVAC+ is the third system in its product line to be displayed at the exhibition.
The company explained that SITEEVAC+ is a wireless mesh fire detection and alarm system supporting up to 50 devices in 3 zones.
It said the system is intended for projects working within lower budgets while still requiring essential fire detection capability.
According to Bull Products, SITEEVAC+ is particularly suited to housebuilding and development sites.
It added that the system uses EN 54-5 and EN 54-7 certified detector heads.
Company statement on exhibition
Carl Leeson, Head of Sales at Bull Products, said: “We’re excited to be exhibiting at UK Construction Week Birmingham after the success of the London event in May.
“We invite attendees to visit us at stand D112 to discover how Bull Products has a cutting-edge solution for every application with SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+.”
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The exhibition of Bull Products at UK Construction Week provides sector professionals with an opportunity to assess compliance-focused fire detection and alarm systems designed for construction environments.
The presence of SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+ demonstrates the range of wireless mesh systems available across different project budgets and operational scales.
For safety managers, the integration of temporary and permanent detection systems into site operations is relevant to meeting regulatory standards such as JCoP and HSG168.
The addition of services such as Fire 360° also links fire safety provision with sustainability objectives, reflecting operational and compliance requirements within the sector.
Bull Products to exhibit at UK Construction Week 2025: Summary
Bull Products has announced its first appearance at UK Construction Week Birmingham.
The company will be at stand D112 from 30 September to 2 October 2025.
It will present its Fire 360° service and fire detection systems SITENET, SITEPROTECT and SITEEVAC+.
Fire 360° includes design, installation, commissioning, maintenance, asset collection, cleaning and inspection.
The service supports the Green Bull initiative for carbon reduction.
SITENET is EN 54 certified and supports up to 511 devices across 32 zones.
It uses wireless mesh technology with network redundancy and channel hopping.
SITEPROTECT supports up to 480 devices in 15 zones and includes fire, first aid, intruder and lockdown alarms.
The SITEPROTECT lockdown system was developed for education and can be applied in public sites.
SITEEVAC+ supports up to 50 devices in 3 zones and is intended for cost-sensitive projects.
It uses EN 54-5 and EN 54-7 certified detector heads.
Carl Leeson, Head of Sales at Bull Products, confirmed the company’s invitation for attendees to visit the stand.
Ahlstrom expands fire protection technology in building materials
Ahlstrom introduces new facer with fire protection technology
Ahlstrom has announced the release of a new facer using its Flame-Gard technology for the building and construction sector.
According to Ahlstrom, the facer is designed to improve fire protection by charring rather than supporting combustion, and by self-extinguishing once the flame source is removed.
The company said the material also strengthens insulation boards, helping them remain flat during manufacturing and use.
It added that the facer balances high flame resistance with low water absorption, two features it noted are often difficult to achieve together.
Ahlstrom explained that the technology was developed in response to rising regulatory requirements and market demand for flame-retardant materials.
Mechanical and thermal performance
Ahlstrom reported that the facer enhances mechanical strength, ensuring insulation boards maintain their shape through production and service life.
The organisation stated that the facer reduces the risk of deformation, creasing, or cracks during lamination.
It added that the facer can be laminated with aluminium foil or insulation foam to support different construction applications.
The company confirmed the facer is available in a natural, unbleached version intended to align with sustainability targets.
It explained that the product is free from halogens, bromine, and chlorine-based compounds.
Moisture resistance and durability
Ahlstrom advised that the facer can be surface-sized to reduce water absorption.
It reported that this treatment lowers the risk of delamination if boards are exposed to moisture during use.
The organisation added that the material’s in-plane structure supports durability during handling and installation.
According to the company, this combination of resistance and strength was intended to meet long-term building performance needs.
It indicated that the design aimed to address the dual challenges of fire safety and moisture control in insulation materials.
Regulatory context and market demand
Ahlstrom stated that the Flame-Gard technology addresses increasing awareness of fire safety and tighter building codes worldwide.
The group explained that stricter standards have increased demand for materials that can both resist flames and remain durable in construction environments.
It reported that the facer was developed to help manufacturers meet current compliance obligations and anticipate future regulatory changes.
The company added that by aligning with these standards, the facer supports safer building design and material selection.
It commented that the development reflects broader sector changes in fire safety requirements for insulation products.
Production process and material supply
Ahlstrom explained that the facer is manufactured in an integrated mill, where both pulp and paper are produced.
The organisation reported that this process enables efficiency and control across the production chain.
It said that the integration of pulp and paper production helps ensure quality consistency in each batch.
The company added that the controlled process allows greater oversight of sustainability and performance outcomes.
It stated that this approach is intended to ensure the product meets both operational and environmental expectations.
Industry perspective
Eva Thunholm, Vice President of Technical Materials at Ahlstrom, said: “With Ahlstrom’s Flame-Gard technology, customers can enhance the fire performance of their final products and meet the required regulatory standards.
“With Ahlstrom’s Flame-Gard technology, customers can enhance the fire performance of their final products and meet the required regulatory standards.
“The technology can be applied to various substrates making it a flexible solution.”
Thunholm added that the product’s adaptability supported different applications in insulation and construction.
She explained that its flexibility allowed manufacturers to incorporate fire-resistant features across multiple substrate types.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
For fire and safety professionals, Ahlstrom’s new facer highlights the increasing integration of fire protection into construction materials.
The development illustrates how manufacturers are aligning material design with stricter building codes.
It provides insight into the technical methods being used to meet compliance, including balancing fire resistance with water control.
The product also reflects a trend toward sustainability in fire-resistant materials, as the natural, unbleached version responds to both performance and environmental considerations.
Ahlstrom expands fire protection technology in building materials: Summary
Ahlstrom has released a new facer with Flame-Gard technology for the construction sector.
According to Ahlstrom, the facer chars during fire exposure but does not sustain combustion and will self-extinguish when the flame source is removed.
The company said the facer strengthens insulation boards, improves fire resistance, and controls water absorption.
It added that the facer reduces deformation and can be laminated with aluminium foil or insulation foam.
Ahlstrom stated that the product avoids halogens, bromine, and chlorine-based compounds and is available in a natural, unbleached version.
The organisation confirmed the facer can be surface-sized to lower water absorption and limit delamination.
It reported that the facer is produced in an integrated mill for efficiency and control.
Eva Thunholm, Vice President of Technical Materials, said the technology enhances fire performance and supports regulatory compliance.
Ahlstrom noted that the facer addresses rising building code requirements for flame-retardant materials.
It stated that the product combines fire resistance, moisture durability, and sustainability in one design.
Walls that work under pressure: Why EN 13501-1 changes everything
Joe Ragdale, Technical Director at Wetherby Wall Systems, explores how EN 13501-1 redefines external wall testing and what developers need to do now
BS 476, the UK’s long-standing fire testing standard, is being phased out, and by September 2029, it will no longer be recognised under building regulations.
On the surface, that might feel like a distant deadline, but the reality is that the transition has already begun.
Waiting too long to adapt can result in costly redesigns, project delays, or compliance issues that are far more challenging and expensive to resolve once construction is underway.
The transition to EN 13501-1 has already started
The switch to EN standards isn’t something that’s coming.
It’s already happening.
Since March 2025, BS 476 has started being gradually removed from Approved Document B, signalling a clear move towards EN 13501-1 as the new fire classification benchmark for external wall systems.
By 2029, EN 13501-1 will be the only accepted standard.
That means all external wall build-ups, including cladding, insulation, cavity barriers and fixings, will need to be tested and classified as a full system.
This is a major shift away from the old approach, where materials were tested separately using small-scale tests like BS 476 Parts 6 and 7.
This change is part of a broader effort to strengthen building safety regulations in response to fire safety concerns and ongoing remediation issues.
Since the Grenfell tragedy in 2017, regulatory bodies, industry professionals and government departments have been working to create a more robust, accountable framework that addresses the risks caused by complex wall systems, not just their individual components.
While BS 476 focused on how individual materials behaved in test conditions, EN 13501-1 looks at how everything performs together in a real fire.
What makes EN 13501-1 different?
EN 13501-1 focuses on how the full wall system performs, rather than just the individual materials.
It introduces Euroclass ratings such as A1 or A2-s1,d0, which take into account things like how easily something burns, how much smoke it gives off, and whether it produces flaming droplets.
All of these can make a big difference to how a fire spreads and how safe the building is for people inside.
But ticking off those ratings isn’t enough.
What really matters is how the full wall performs when everything is installed together.
That includes the insulation, cavity barriers, fixings, sheathing boards and final finish.
If one part of that system hasn’t been tested in combination with the others, it may not meet the requirements.
In other words, using A2-rated insulation on its own isn’t enough.
If that insulation hasn’t been tested as part of a complete wall system, it won’t be considered compliant under EN 13501-1.
Why system-level testing matters
Fire doesn’t move in straight lines or follow neat paths.
It spreads in unpredictable ways, and the way materials interact can make a big difference to how a fire develops.
That’s why testing materials separately only tells part of the story.
Just because every product in a wall passes testing on its own, that doesn’t mean the finished wall will perform safely.
A cladding panel and insulation board might both be A2-rated, but without being tested together, with the right barriers and fixings, there’s no way to guarantee they’ll be safe when installed on a building.
That’s where EN 13501-1 comes in.
It requires large-scale testing, typically using BS 8414, to see how fire behaves across a full wall system.
For internal walls and floors, tests like BS EN 1364-1 and 1365-1 are used to assess how well fire is contained within the building.
Joe Ragdale, Technical Director at Wetherby Wall Systems, works with developers across the UK to design fire-safe façades.
He says: “We’re seeing a major shift. It’s not enough to know your materials are rated A2.
“You need to show how the whole system behaves when it’s built.
“That’s the level of detail the new rules demand.”
System-level testing also gives designers and contractors a clearer picture of risk.
Something as simple as the wrong cavity barrier or an off-spec fixing can create a weak point that allows fire to spread.
These are the kinds of issues that wouldn’t show up in small-scale tests.
It also helps to spot inconsistencies in installation that could compromise safety, which is why choosing well-supported systems with full technical guidance is key.
The cost of falling behind
Even though the new standards are already in motion, many buildings are still behind.
As of early 2025, only 46% of high-rise buildings that applied to the Building Safety Fund for non-ACM cladding work had completed the job.
That’s despite the fact that the industry has known this change was coming for a while.
Some developers are still working off outdated assumptions, relying on material-only assessments and thinking they’ll still be allowed a few years from now.
But once BS 476 is fully removed, these systems will no longer be recognised.
That could lead to massive costs.
The total bill for cladding remediation has already passed £16 billion, and government schemes like the Cladding Safety Scheme are now pushing more of the financial responsibility onto the original developers and contractors.
If your design isn’t compliant now, you could end up having to pay for it later.
It’s also worth noting that delays due to non-compliance can hold up planning approval, stop a project mid-build, or trigger retrospective rebuilds, all of which come with a serious price tag.
And if your product or system choice later turns out to fall short, you may not be able to rely on previous approvals as a defence.
Accountability is rising too
On top of the technical changes, the legal framework is tightening as well.
The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced new rules that make Principal Designers, Contractors and other key parties more accountable for safety decisions.
One of the biggest changes is the 30-year retrospective liability period.
That means if something goes wrong years down the line, those involved in the original design and construction could still be held responsible.
There’s also the new requirement for a digital record of safety decisions, known as the “golden thread”.
This includes everything from fire testing data and installation notes to product specifications and maintenance guidance.
Without it, proving compliance will be a lot harder if questions arise in the future.
What developers should be doing now
If you haven’t started preparing for EN 13501-1 yet, now is the time to get moving.
Leaving it until the last minute could result in delays, cost increases and limited access to testing facilities and qualified help.
Start by making sure the external wall systems you specify have been tested as full assemblies.
Look for systems that already meet A1 or A2-s1,d0 ratings, with test evidence covering the insulation, cavity barriers, cladding, fixings and other components all working together.
Make sure you’re working with manufacturers and suppliers who can provide full documentation, including test reports, classification certificates and detailed installation guidance.
This is what will protect your project and your reputation if it’s ever called into question.
As Ragdale says: “This isn’t just a box-ticking exercise.
“It’s about building something that stands up to scrutiny, now and in the future.
“Getting it right today protects your project, your reputation and your business.”
It’s also worth reviewing your internal processes.
Are your design teams fully up to speed with the latest test standards? Is there a clear process for documenting system selection, supplier evidence, and on-site installation details?
Building these habits now will help future-proof your work.
This was originally published in the August 2025 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.
New UK guide challenges how the construction industry chooses its products
Industry bodies collaborate on new construction product safety guide
The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has released a new publication providing advice on the safe use of construction products in the UK.
According to CIOB, the Guide to Products Critical to Safe Construction has been developed with support from the Construction Products Association (CPA), the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI), the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA).
The guide is aimed at designers, specifiers and installers and sets out how to determine whether a product is critical to safe construction.
CIOB stated that the guide includes examples and case studies that reference existing industry standards, including the Code for Construction Product Information.
The publication is available free of charge in electronic format.
Background from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry
CIOB explained that the Grenfell Tower Inquiry identified failings in the UK’s construction product regulatory regime.
It said that the Inquiry found that the system did not ensure that products used in buildings were safe when used alone or as part of a wider system.
The organisation noted that the Inquiry’s findings were followed by further reports, including Building a Safer Future: Final Report and the Independent Review of Product Testing and Certification (the Morrell-Day Review).
According to CIOB, these reports recommended stronger regulation of manufacturing, testing and product supply.
It added that the UK Government published the Construction Product Reform Green Paper in February 2025, setting out proposals for a system that ensures safe products are safely used.
CIOB statement on the new guide
Paul Nash, Chair of CIOB’s Quality Implementation Group, said: “The outcomes of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry exposed a construction product regulatory regime that was failing to ensure that the products used in buildings, whether separately or part of a system, were safe.”
“In February 2025, the government published a Construction Product Reform Green Paper that sets out its proposals to deliver a system that guarantees safe products, safely used.
“It is against this backdrop that the CIOB, together with other professional bodies, has developed this Guide to Products Critical to Safe Construction to ensure the buildings we create, and the products we use in those buildings, are safe for those who use them, now and in the future.”
Guidance content and intended use
According to CIOB, the guide is intended to help industry professionals make informed product selection decisions.
It said the publication contains examples and case studies showing best practice in the assessment and selection of construction products.
The organisation explained that the guidance can be applied to products that are safety-critical whether they are used individually or as part of a system.
It added that the material is relevant across multiple building types and project scales.
CIOB stated that the guidance has been authored by Lorna Hagan, Civil Engineer and Chartered Quality Practitioner for Construct Tuition, and Chris Miles, Lead Assessor for the Code for Construction Product Information.
Comments from collaborating organisations
Chief Executive for CCPI, Amanda Long, said: “Whilst the guide has been developed against the backdrop of an emerging regulatory regime for construction products, its purpose is to support industry to act now to help to ensure that buildings are safe for those who use them, now and in the future.”
Duncan Johnson, Deputy Director, Construction Products Regulation, Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), added: “I welcome the collaborative efforts behind this guide, which brings together expertise from across the built environment sector to support safe and compliant construction, underpinned by clarity and consistency in product information.
“This guide contributes to raising standards and improving safety across the construction industry.”
Availability and access
CIOB confirmed that the guide is only available electronically.
It said that the digital format ensures accessibility for a wide range of users.
The organisation added that the free availability of the guide is intended to support adoption across the construction sector.
It stated that the resource can be accessed via CIOB and partner organisation websites.
Relevance for fire and safety professionals
The guidance addresses the safety of construction products, which directly impacts the fire safety performance of buildings.
It sets out methods for identifying products that are critical to safety, including those used in fire protection systems.
The publication aligns with wider regulatory changes following the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, which included fire safety considerations in its recommendations.
Fire safety professionals may use the guide to support compliance assessments, specification processes and procurement decisions.
CIOB publishes UK guide to products critical to safe construction: Summary
The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has released the Guide to Products Critical to Safe Construction.
The guide was developed in collaboration with the Construction Products Association (CPA), the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI), the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA).
The publication aims to help designers, specifiers and installers identify safety-critical construction products.
It includes examples and case studies showing industry best practice.
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry identified failings in the UK’s construction product regulatory regime.
Further reports, including the Morrell-Day Review, recommended stronger regulation.
The UK Government published the Construction Product Reform Green Paper in February 2025.
Paul Nash of CIOB said the guide supports the creation of safe buildings.
Amanda Long of CCPI and Duncan Johnson of OPSS welcomed the guide.
The resource is free and available electronically.
UK government outlines approach to Grenfell Tower deconstruction
How Grenfell Tower will be taken down
The UK government has announced that the step-by-step removal of Grenfell Tower will begin from the top of the building, carried out in a way described as sensitive and trauma-informed.
According to HM Government, each floor of the tower is expected to take approximately one month to remove, with the process involving both internal dismantling and external crane operations.
Large sections such as external columns will be removed in covered containers by crane, while smaller components will be taken down from inside the building.
The entire deconstruction will be conducted behind the white external wrapping that currently encloses the structure.
Officials said the decision to proceed with the removal follows long-term engagement with bereaved families, survivors, and the local community, and is being managed to minimise disruption to those living or working nearby.
Preparatory work and site changes during summer 2025
Preparations for the removal of Grenfell Tower include structural modifications and the installation of heavy machinery.
HM Government confirmed that a crane will be installed on the east side of the tower to assist with the removal of materials, which will be loaded into covered lorries and transported away from the site.
Scaffolding will be altered to accommodate the deconstruction process, including the addition of a second scaffold platform.
Work is also underway to install framing for a second banner bearing the green heart design.
Officials stated that both banners will be visible for a short period while the top banner is moved progressively down the building in line with the work.
Illumination options are being explored to maintain the tower’s visibility on the skyline during and after the works.
Storage, removal and memorial of tower materials
All materials removed from the building will be handled with care and discretion, with the aim of preserving their significance for the bereaved and survivor community.
The UK government said it will offer selected elements of the building for potential inclusion in a future memorial, working with the independent Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission and local stakeholders.
These preserved components will include the architectural crown and other elements agreed upon by the community.
Everything removed from the site will be transported using unmarked and covered lorries, according to the update.
HM Government said it is consulting with families and faith leaders about a separate second site in North Kensington, where the remaining materials may be laid to rest.
Health, safety and regulation of the site
The government said the deconstruction will follow safety protocols intended to reduce noise and disruption.
The process is subject to oversight from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which maintains enforcement authority and has carried out site visits since 2017.
HSE’s role includes inspections under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations, with the power to issue improvement or prohibition notices.
HM Government said it will continue to monitor the structure using a 24/7 system and floor-by-floor inspections by structural engineers.
It is also working with local partners and the UK Health Security Agency to support public health measures.
Contractor appointment and community access
Deconstruct UK (DUK) has been appointed as the principal contractor responsible for the deconstruction.
HM Government stated that DUK has maintained and monitored the Grenfell Tower site since 2017 and holds certifications from the British Standards Institute and other safety schemes.
The decision to assign the project to DUK was based on its familiarity with the site and its ongoing relationship with the local community, according to the government.
Bereaved families and residents are being invited to regular meetings with officials and DUK representatives to discuss project timelines and ask questions.
The government said the public can contact the site management team directly to arrange individual or group discussions.
UK government outlines approach to Grenfell Tower deconstruction: Summary
The UK government has confirmed that Grenfell Tower will be taken down floor by floor.
Each floor will take around one month to remove.
All work will be done behind the existing white external wrapping.
Smaller parts of the structure will be dismantled internally.
Larger structural components will be removed by crane.
A crane will be installed on the east side of the site.
Scaffolding will be adjusted to support the removal process.
Two banners bearing the green heart design will be displayed temporarily.
Removed materials will be covered and taken away in unmarked lorries.
Selected elements will be preserved for inclusion in a future memorial.
The government is consulting on a separate site for laying materials to rest.
The Health and Safety Executive will monitor and regulate the works.
Deconstruct UK will carry out the removal.
The contractor has worked on the Grenfell site since 2017.
Meetings are being held with families and residents for updates and questions.
Health and wellbeing services remain available to the community.
PlanRadar event highlights shift to digital construction
Industry event explores PlanRadar’s role in digital construction
PlanRadar recently hosted an industry event in Spain, bringing together stakeholders from engineering, construction, and legal sectors to discuss digital transformation, with participants including Arup, Eversheds Sutherland and construction firm Avintia.
The event focused on moving away from paper-based systems in favour of cloud-based tools that enable full traceability, risk reduction, and better data access.
It added that discussions centred on how platforms like PlanRadar support quality control, dispute avoidance, and the broader application of artificial intelligence in project delivery.
PlanRadar stated that the event marked part of its wider strategy to support digital adoption across the construction industry.
Arup outlines evaluation process for digital adoption
Arup joined the event as a customer of PlanRadar and shared its approach to selecting digital tools.
Sara Briz, Project Manager at Arup, said: “When evaluating tools, we aim for impartiality and seek out the best fit for our needs. In this case, that led us to PlanRadar.
“We chose PlanRadar for its ability to deliver process improvement, automation, and comprehensive data traceability.
“This aligns with our broader AI strategy, enabling our teams to focus on high-value creative and strategic work while maintaining complete digital documentation.”
Arup said its use of PlanRadar forms part of a wider initiative to increase automation and reduce manual reporting tasks on projects.
The firm added that comprehensive data capture was a key requirement during its evaluation of available systems.
Legal insights highlight value of digital documentation
Eversheds Sutherland was invited to contribute its legal perspective on the role of digital tools in construction.
According to PlanRadar, the firm addressed how documentation platforms can support legal processes and reduce the risk of disputes.
Andrés Ponce, Legal Director at Eversheds Sutherland, said: “The use of these types of tools significantly reduces the potential for disputes between stakeholders, creating a more collaborative environment and greater productivity in project development.”
He said digital documentation had become more important as AI tools are increasingly used in legal proceedings related to construction.
PlanRadar stated that the legal contribution helped demonstrate how its system supports audit trails and evidentiary standards.
PlanRadar says industry shift is underway
PlanRadar said the event captured a moment of change for the construction sector, as firms adapt to digital workflows.
Rob Norton, UK Director at PlanRadar, said: “Gathering perspectives from leading firms like Arup and Eversheds, alongside our valued customers like Avintia, at our recent event in Spain, highlights a pivotal moment in construction’s digital evolution.
“We are creating an environment that can deliver benefits including enhanced project quality, comprehensive traceability, significant risk reduction, and improved productivity across the construction value chain.”
PlanRadar said Avintia, one of its largest customers, has already introduced more than 10,000 subcontractors to the system.
It added that cloud-based platforms now offer real-time collaboration between teams, which was previously hindered by manual documentation.
PlanRadar plans further events focused on AI in construction
PlanRadar confirmed it will continue hosting events as part of its industry engagement strategy.
The company said upcoming discussions will place greater focus on artificial intelligence and how it is influencing project delivery models.
It added that digital platforms will play a key role in enabling AI-ready project environments by improving structured data access.
PlanRadar said it aims to support further collaboration between engineering, legal, and project management disciplines through these sessions.
According to the firm, future sessions will also feature customer case studies on the implementation of automated workflows and document audit systems.
PlanRadar event highlights shift to digital construction: Summary
PlanRadar hosted an industry event in Spain.
Participants included Arup, Eversheds Sutherland, and Avintia.
The event focused on digital transformation in construction.
PlanRadar said the shift away from paper systems was a key theme.
Arup shared its reasons for choosing PlanRadar.
Eversheds discussed the legal importance of digital records.
PlanRadar said the event reflects change in the construction sector.
Avintia has introduced over 10,000 subcontractors to PlanRadar.
PlanRadar said AI will be a focus of future events.
The company aims to support industry collaboration through digital tools.
Fire stopping system deployed in Ark and FSi Promat collaboration
Fire stopping system installed on London construction site
Ark Fire Protection has reported a new on-site fire stopping collaboration with manufacturer FSi Promat, taking place at a live Hill construction project in Newnton Close, London.
The partnership involved the installation of the FlexiCoat System, which FSi Promat said offers up to 120 minutes of certified fire resistance through a combination of liquid-applied coatings and pre-coated sealing components.
Ark Fire Protection stated that both FlexiCoat products used in the installation hold the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI) mark.
According to Ark Fire Protection, the project has been documented in a behind-the-scenes video due to be published via both companies’ online channels.
The company said the project demonstrates the practical application of certified passive fire protection methods in real construction environments.
Installation featured FlexiCoat System and CCPI compliance
FSi Promat explained that its FlexiCoat System includes two components designed for sealing penetrations and apertures.
According to the manufacturer, the system comprises a liquid-applied coating and a pre-coated solution known as “Flexi-Coat Fingers”, which together form part of its wider passive protection product portfolio.
The manufacturer added that both elements used in the Ark installation are certified for up to 120 minutes of fire resistance and have been assessed under the CCPI framework.
FSi Promat said the system is designed to remain flexible on site while meeting performance standards set out by UK regulations.
Charlie Perkins, Senior Technical Advisor at FSi Promat, said: “The FlexiCoat System is designed to meet the highest standards of performance and compliance, with built-in flexibility for a wide range of site conditions.
“Working alongside Ark Fire Protection, a team that shares our commitment to precision and integrity, ensures the system is installed exactly as intended – safely, effectively, and in full alignment with fire safety regulations.”
Ark Fire Protection outlines compliance approach
Ark Fire Protection stated that it takes a staged approach to passive fire protection, combining design collaboration with third-party certification and documented quality assurance.
According to the company, it is FIRAS-certified, UKAS-compliant, and ISO 9001:2015-accredited, with all fire stopping work subject to inspection and verification.
Howard Hudson, Managing Director of Ark Fire Protection, said: “At Ark Fire Protection, collaboration is at the core of everything we do.
“By working closely with trusted manufacturers like FSi Promat from the design stage onward, we ensure that every product specified is not just compliant – but precisely matched to the risks and layouts of individual buildings.”
Operations Director Joe Gale added: “We never cut corners.
“Every fire stopping detail is backed by training, manufacturer collaboration, and ongoing compliance audits.
“That’s what it means to deliver passive fire protection the Ark way.”
Joint project to be shared via digital video
Ark Fire Protection confirmed that the project with FSi Promat was documented via video during its execution on the London site.
According to the company, the video shows the process of installation, manufacturer collaboration, and on-site verification of passive fire products.
The film is due to be released via Ark Fire Protection’s and FSi Promat’s websites and LinkedIn platforms.
Ark said the video will serve as a record of best practice and a communication tool for both clients and the wider construction industry.
Hudson said: “Projects like this not only strengthen our partnerships – but also reinforce the trust our clients place in us to deliver safety, quality, and compliance at every stage.”
Companies aim to promote industry-wide compliance culture
Ark Fire Protection said that part of the motivation for documenting the project was to support broader sector goals around transparency, product traceability, and standards adherence.
FSi Promat is part of the wider Etex Group, which includes other UK construction product brands such as Siniat, Promat, Equitone, Remagin, Superglass and Ursa.
The company said that it continues to prioritise technical development and certified testing across its fire stopping product lines.
Ark Fire Protection stated that its work on the Hill site reflects a shared approach to specification-led collaboration, risk-aligned protection, and site-specific solutions.
Both companies said they will continue to focus on compliance, traceability, and knowledge sharing through joint projects and public communication.
Fire stopping system deployed in Ark and FSi Promat collaboration: Summary
Ark Fire Protection has collaborated with FSi Promat to install a fire stopping system at a Hill construction site in London.
The installation used FSi Promat’s FlexiCoat System, which includes a liquid coating and pre-coated components.
FSi Promat stated that the system offers up to 120 minutes of certified fire resistance.
Both products used are marked under the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI).
Ark Fire Protection said the project aligns with its certified approach to quality assurance and regulatory compliance.
The company is FIRAS-certified, UKAS-compliant, and ISO 9001:2015-accredited.
Video footage of the installation is expected to be released by both companies.
Ark stated that the collaboration reflects its focus on risk-matched specification and product accountability.
FSi Promat is part of the Etex Group of UK construction product manufacturers.
The project was carried out at Newnton Close, London.