Maintenance of Fire Equipment: Inspection, Testing & Safety Best Practices

by Breaking News

Most people never give their fire extinguishers a second thought. They hang on the wall, gathering dust, ignored, right up until the day something catches, and that’s the exact moment you find out whether anyone bothered to check them. The maintenance of fire equipment isn’t glamorous. Nobody’s handing out awards for it. But skip it, and a device you’re betting a life on can quietly turn into a dead weight bolted to the wall.

Here’s the thing: gear fails. Pressure leaks out, seals crack, rust creeps in where you can’t see it. A regular fire extinguisher inspection and a bit of routine testing catch all that before it matters. Good maintenance of fire equipment keeps your fire safety equipment doing its job for real, not just on paper. This piece runs through the checks, tests, servicing, and habits that keep everything working. Whether it’s a corner shop or factory floor, it doesn’t matter; looking after your fire safety equipment, smart fire detection systems included, is what keeps you compliant and, more to the point, keeps people alive.

Essential Checks During Fire Equipment Inspection

Inspection is where it all starts. A proper fire equipment inspection anchors the entire maintenance routine, and it’s not complicated: you’re confirming that each unit is present, accessible, and in working order. During a fire extinguisher inspection, someone checks that the units are mounted correctly, charged, and not buried behind a stack of boxes. Sounds obvious. You’d be surprised how often it doesn’t happen. Catch the small stuff now, and your fire safety equipment won’t let you down later.

Visual Inspection of Fire Equipment

Start with your eyes. Are the extinguishers and the rest of your fire safety equipment hung at the right height, and can you actually reach them? Look for dents, cracks, and corrosion on the cylinder and hose. The label and instructions need to be readable because whoever ends up using a fire extinguisher in a panic won’t have time to squint at faded print. Check the gauge sits in the green. Make sure the pin’s in and the tamper seal hasn’t been messed with. Anything that comes up during a fire extinguisher inspection goes straight to the top of the list.

Identifying Issues During Fire Equipment Inspections

So what turns up? Low pressure, mostly. Leaky valves, blocked nozzles, missing pins, tags that expired two years ago. Older units go rusty and dented, hoses turn brittle. When you find something, write it down and sort out the repair, recharge, or swap. That’s really all maintenance of fire equipment comes down to: spotting a problem and doing something about it, so your smart fire detection systems and the plain old handheld bottles both stay ready.

Fire Equipment Testing Procedures for Safety Compliance

Inspection tells you a thing looks fine. Testing tells you it works. Big difference. This is a huge chunk of the maintenance of fire equipment, because plenty of gear sails through a glance and then dies the second you pull the trigger. Testing is the alarm going off, the sprinkler opening, the extinguisher firing. Solid extinguishing systems maintenance means flow tests, pressure checks, panel checks, and proving the whole setup does its job when a room is filling with smoke.

Testing Fire Extinguishers and Fire Protection Systems

For the portable ones, you’re checking pressure, weighing the cylinder to confirm there’s enough agent inside, and making sure the discharge mechanism moves. For fixed systems, maintenance of extinguishing systems means testing pumps, pipes, and nozzles to verify proper flow and coverage. Alarm panels and smart fire detection systems get tested too: do the sensors trip, does the signal reach whoever’s watching the board? This testing side of fire equipment maintenance is the part that lets you sleep at night, knowing that everything from a hand-held bottle to a full suppression system will go off when it counts. Write down every test. It builds your paper trail and flags any fire safety equipment that needs another look.

Fire Extinguisher Maintenance and Servicing Requirements

Inspection and testing aren’t the whole story. Extinguishers need proper servicing too, and that’s the deeper end of maintenance of fire equipment the stuff you hand to a trained tech, not the office manager. Internal exams, recharging after any use, hydrostatic testing of the cylinder on a set schedule, swapping worn parts. And if one’s been fired, even a half-second squirt, it gets recharged then and there. No exceptions. The next person using fire extinguishers deserves a full one.

Routine Fire Extinguisher Maintenance Checks

The routine checks live in the details. Does the gauge read right? Are the seals and tamper indicators unbroken, the hose free of cracks, the nozzle clear? Give the body a once-over for rust and dents, and check the label’s still readable. Regular fire extinguisher inspection and servicing are the core of proper maintenance of fire equipment. Train your people to use fire extinguishers while you’re at it; a perfectly serviced unit is useless in the hands of someone who’s never used one. Recharge, repair, replace: it all falls out of these checks.

Fire Equipment Maintenance Schedule and Inspection Frequency

A schedule is what separates a real program from a folder full of good intentions. Get the maintenance of fire equipment onto a calendar, and it happens. NFPA 10 recommends monthly visual inspections and annual maintenance by qualified personnel for portable fire extinguishers. Once a year, a proper fire extinguisher inspection from a qualified tech. Fixed systems run on their own clock. Extinguishing system maintenance and flow testing usually occur yearly or twice a year, while hydrostatic testing of cylinders occurs every 5 to 12 years, depending on the type. 

Alarm panels and smart fire detection systems need regular functional tests to ensure the sensors and signals still fire. Put the whole cadence daily, monthly, annual on a shared calendar with a name against each job, and things stop slipping through the cracks. That’s what keeps your maintenance of fire equipment steady instead of scrambled. Set reminders while you’re at it. People get busy, staff moves on, and that’s usually where a missed check hides.

Best Practices for Effective Fire Equipment Maintenance

If I had one bit of advice, it’d be this: treat maintenance of fire equipment as prevention, not repair. Catch the wear before the failure. It’s cheaper, a lot less stressful, and the gear lasts longer. Bring certified pros in for the annual servicing too; the hydrostatic testing and internal exams are not a DIY afternoon. Keep records. Dull, yes, but a log of every inspection, test, and repair covers you when an inspector or insurer comes knocking, and it shows you a pattern when the same unit keeps playing up. 

Plenty of places now run smart fire detection systems with live monitoring and auto-alerts, which make it far easier to stay on top of maintenance and early warnings for extinguishing systems. Train the team on using fire extinguishers as well; no sense owning great kit if nobody can work it. Do the boring stuff consistently, and the maintenance of fire equipment stops feeling like a chore and starts feeling like the thing quietly keeping everyone safe.

Final Verdict

To sum this up, the Maintenance of fire equipment isn’t a one-and-done job. It’s a habit. Keep inspecting, keep testing, keep servicing, and your fire protection stays ready for the one day it truly matters. The NFPA’s NFPA 10 standard for portable extinguishers puts monthly visual checks and annual professional servicing down as the baseline for keeping units operable. Stick to a schedule, lean on qualified pros, and that side of things mostly takes care of itself. Spend a little on proper maintenance of extinguishing systems and decent monitoring now, and you won’t be rolling the dice with people’s lives later. Get everyone trained to use fire extinguishers, and you’ve got a setup that actually holds up when the alarm goes off.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should fire equipment be inspected and maintained? 

Give portable extinguishers a monthly look-over and a full professional service once a year. Fixed systems and alarms usually need testing yearly or every six months.

What is included in fire equipment inspection and testing? 

Inspection is the condition check: access, pressure, seals, physical state. Testing is the proof: alarms sounding, sprinklers flowing, extinguishers firing.

Why is regular maintenance of fire equipment important? 

Because equipment nobody looks after fails, and it tends to fail at the worst possible moment. Regular care keeps you legal, makes the gear last, and is the part that really counts.

What are the common issues found during fire equipment maintenance?

Low pressure, corrosion, cracked hoses, blocked nozzles, missing pins, expired tags, leaky valves the usual suspects.

Who should perform fire equipment inspection and maintenance? 

Your own trained staff can handle the daily and monthly eyeballing, no problem. But the serious end of maintenance- fire equipment servicing, hydrostatic testing, certification should go to qualified, certified fire safety pros.

Fire safety: from a compliance obligation to a strategic enabler of autonomous buildings

by Americas - Breaking NewsBreaking NewsBuilding ManagementFire EngineeringHealth and SafetyProjects

Susanne Seitz, CEO of Buildings Smart Infrastructure at Siemens , explains why digital, IoT-enabled fire safety systems are transforming fire protection

For decades, fire safety systems have been viewed primarily through the lens of compliance. Essential, yes – but rarely seen as a contributor to performance, resilience or sustainability. As buildings become smarter and more autonomous, that perspective needs to change.

Across industries, aging fire safety infrastructure often hides significant inefficiencies: high false alarm rates, disconnected systems, rising maintenance effort and limited ability to use data effectively. Facility teams spend up to 60% of their time validating false alarms rather than focusing on value-adding tasks.

In a world of tight budgets and skilled labor shortages, this is no longer sustainable. As energy systems evolve – for example, with the increased use of lithium-ion batteries in data centers – modern fire detection and protection become even more critical.

Modern, IoT-enabled fire safety systems fundamentally shift this reality. By embedding intelligence and connectivity, fire safety moves beyond an isolated layer to become an integral part of the digital building ecosystem.

This deeper integration allows fire safety data and events to inform and interact with other critical building systems – from triggering HVAC adjustments to contain smoke, to coordinating with access control for safe evacuation, or even informing building automation for optimized emergency responses.

The impact is tangible. Reactive maintenance becomes predictive planning. Periodic testing evolves into continuous, silent monitoring.

And with solutions like Building X Fire Apps, single-building oversight expands to portfolio-wide visibility, enabling consolidated management and insights across multiple sites.

This digital transformation also helps reduce false alarms by approximately 80%, significantly improving operational efficiency and occupant experience.

Digital fire safety also unlocks a new generation of services. Cloud connectivity, remote diagnostics, and advanced analytics allow technicians to arrive prepared, resolve issues faster, and reduce repeat visits – helping organizations cope with ongoing talent shortages.

At the same time, predictive insights enable smarter investment and data-driven lifecycle decisions.

Sustainability is another critical dimension. Targeted upgrades instead of full system replacements reduce electronic waste. Remote management lowers emissions by minimising the number of site visits. And advanced detection algorithms help avoid unnecessary emergency responses triggered by false alarms.

New technology is already beginning to deliver value across sectors. In healthcare, digital fire safety supports uptime and patient safety through data-driven operations. In higher education, it simplifies the management of complex campuses with diverse building types.

And in commercial real estate, it forms a foundation for more autonomous, scalable building operations.

The conclusion is clear: the question is no longer whether fire safety systems should be modernised, but how strategically can organisations approach it.

As we move toward autonomous buildings, fire safety must be digital-native, cybersecure and seamlessly integrated into the building’s intelligence layer. Those who rethink fire safety beyond compliance will unlock meaningful gains in operational performance, sustainability and long-term resilience.

This article was originally published on LinkedIn. The original article can be found here.

5 of the biggest fire safety news stories of 2026 so far

by ActiveAmericas - Breaking NewsAmericas - ProductsBreaking NewsBuilding ManagementConstructionFire DetectionFire EngineeringFire SuppressionFire SuppressionHealth and SafetyMENA - Breaking NewsMENA - ProductsMENA - ProjectsMiddle East - Breaking NewsMiddle East - EventsPassivePeopleProductsProjectsProjectsPublic EventsPublic EventsSafety

2026 has already delivered no shortage of headlines in terms of fire safety news. As fire risks continue to evolve, so too does the industry’s response, with innovation, regulation and investment shaping the future of fire protection and life safety.

In this roundup, we look back at five of the biggest fire safety news stories of 2026 so far. These developments have captured the attention of fire safety professionals worldwide, influencing policy, operations and the technologies protecting people, property and critical infrastructure.

KiddeFenwal expands NATURA line with Micro fire protection for small assets

In January, KiddeFenwal launched NATURA Micro, a compact inert gas fire suppression system offered through its Kidde Fire Systems brand.

The system was introduced at Intersec in Dubai, which took place from 12 to 14 January. NATURA Micro forms part of the company’s inert gas systems portfolio and is intended to protect enclosed, small-sized assets.

Swiss ski resort fire at Le Constellation

January also saw a devastating fire break out at Le Constellation, Crans-Montana, Switzerland, during New Year celebrations in the early hours of 01/01/2026.

Police said the fire started at around 1:30am local time, when the basement bar was busy with revellers marking the turn of the year.

Click here for our coverage on timeline, casualties and investigation.

New Class L created specifically for lithium-ion battery fires

February kicked off with the launch of a new classification for lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery fires. BSI confirmed the update reflects the growing use of Li-ion batteries across the built environment, from large energy storage systems to electric vehicles and personal mobility devices.

Fire safety news

The standard classifies fires according to the nature of the material undergoing combustion.

Battery storage standard UL 9540A updated with large-scale fire testing

Standards and regulations were also on the mind in terms of fire safety news in March, with UL Standards & Solutions publishing the sixth edition of UL 9540A, adding large-scale fire testing requirements to the standard for evaluating thermal runaway fire propagation in battery energy storage systems.

The new edition was published on 13 March and is described it as a key standard for battery energy storage systems (BESS), including lithium-ion systems.

Philippines launches Fire Prevention Month

Meanwhile, March saw the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) officially launch Fire Prevention Month in the Philippines with an assembly of more than 3,000 people and over 300 vehicles on March 1.

The Manila Bulletin reported that the event was led by BFP chief Director Jesus Fernandez.

The launch brought together BFP personnel, national government agencies, local and barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Offices, fire volunteers, fire brigades, private partners and non-government organisations.

How Self Contained Breathing Apparatus Enhances Fireground Safety

by Breaking News

Fires don’t wait for firefighters to get comfortable. Smoke thickens quickly, chemical byproducts pile up, and oxygen can drop to dangerous levels within minutes. That’s the reality a self contained breathing apparatus is built for. Ask any veteran firefighter what piece of gear they’d never step into a burning structure without, and the SCBA is usually the first thing they mention. It’s not glamorous. It’s just the thing that keeps you breathing when the room around you can’t.

The technology has come a long way from the clunky tanks and masks of decades past. A modern breathing apparatus now pairs positive-pressure delivery with real-time air monitoring and built-in communication tools, giving crews a much clearer sense of what’s actually happening to their firefighter’s air supply mid-fire. This isn’t just an upgrade for the sake of upgrading either. It’s changing how departments train, how they budget for fireground safety equipment, and honestly, how confident firefighters feel walking into a structure they can’t see two feet into.

What Is a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus?

A Self contained breathing apparatus is a wearable system that provides a firefighter with an independent supply of breathable air, separate from whatever toxic mess is floating around them. This matters because filtering ambient air, which is how a lot of other respirators work, does nothing for you in a room that’s already run out of oxygen. A self-contained breathing apparatus avoids that problem entirely by carrying its own compressed air, so the wearer never has to gamble on the quality of the surrounding air. Strip it down, and you’ve got four main parts: a facepiece, a regulator, a harness and backplate, and the air cylinder itself. Put together, they form a sealed system that pipes clean air straight to the firefighter while keeping smoke, soot, and toxic gases out. 

That’s what makes the self-contained breathing apparatus the go-to tool for firefighter respiratory protection during interior attacks, search and rescue calls, and hazmat response, and honestly the first line of defense for smoke inhalation prevention on almost every run. These days, an SCBA is asked to do more than just deliver air. It also needs to support accountability, communication, and monitoring, all of which matter just as much when things go sideways. Fireground tactics have changed over the years, and the gear inside the mask has had to keep up.

Protection from Toxic Smoke and Hazardous Atmospheres

Smoke on a fireground isn’t one predictable thing you can plan around. It’s a shifting cocktail of carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, fine particulate, and whatever else happens to be burning off the synthetic materials in a modern home. Even a short exposure can leave someone disoriented, or worse, and the long-term respiratory damage from repeated low-level exposure is something plenty of retired firefighters can tell you about firsthand. That’s why smoke inhalation prevention isn’t an afterthought in SCBA design. It shapes everything from how the mask seals to how fast air moves through it.

A self contained breathing apparatus deals with this threat head-on by pushing clean, pressurized air into the facepiece, so contaminants can’t sneak in even if the seal isn’t perfect in the moment. That’s a real step up from older filtration-based respirators, which can get overwhelmed pretty quickly or just miss certain gases altogether. Hazardous atmosphere protection depends entirely on that constant, self-supplied air, especially in below-grade spaces, partially collapsed structures, or industrial sites where oxygen can dip well below what a person needs to think clearly, let alone work.

Oxygen-deficient spaces pose their own dangers, too, since a firefighter can lose coordination and judgment before they even realize something’s wrong. Because a self contained breathing apparatus doesn’t rely on the surrounding air at all, that risk basically disappears. Good respiratory protection equipment built around this idea lets crews push further into a structure with some actual confidence, knowing their air isn’t contingent on filtering whatever unpredictable atmosphere they’ve walked into. Pair that with solid training, and you’ve got the difference between a controlled interior attack and a rushed, sloppy one.

SCBA Components That Improve Safety

Every piece of a self contained breathing apparatus earns its place. The system works as a whole, sure, but three parts in particular have seen the most meaningful safety improvements over the last several years.

Facepiece and Positive Pressure SCBA

The facepiece is where the seal happens, the barrier between a firefighter’s face and whatever’s outside it. A well-fitting facepiece combined with a positive-pressure design keeps the pressure inside slightly higher than the outside, so if there’s ever a leak, clean air pushes out instead of letting smoke or gas creep in. Wide-vision lenses and anti-fog coatings have helped too. Visibility matters just as much as air quality when you’re trying to find your way through a room you can’t see across.

Air Cylinder and Regulator

The cylinder holds the compressed air, and the regulator steps that pressure down to something the lungs can actually use. Together they determine the total firefighter air supply available on any given call, and how long someone can stay in a hazardous atmosphere before pulling back. It’s also one of the bigger factors departments weigh when comparing one self-contained breathing apparatus against another, since more cylinder time often means more work gets done before an evacuation is forced.

PASS Device and Safety Alerts

A PASS device, short for personal alert safety system, sounds an automatic alarm if a firefighter stops moving for a set period, and it can also be triggered manually if someone gets trapped or hurt. It sounds like a small feature on paper. In practice, it’s saved many lives by helping crews quickly locate a downed firefighter when visibility is near zero, reinforcing the accountability aspect of fireground safety equipment.

Why Is Positive Pressure SCBA Important?

Positive pressure SCBA isn’t just a nice-to-have design choice; it’s a functional safeguard that changes how contaminants behave around the facepiece. In a positive-pressure system, the air inside remains at a higher pressure than the outside air, so outside contaminants aren’t drawn in through a small gap. Instead, clean air keeps pushing outward. That matters most in the unpredictable moments on a fireground, when a facepiece seal can get disrupted by sweat, sudden movement, or a fit that isn’t quite right under stress. Older negative pressure designs left firefighters exposed in exactly those situations. 

This positive pressure approach mostly closes that gap, which is a big reason it’s become the standard for firefighter respiratory protection across nearly every department running modern gear, and a defining trait of dependable respiratory protection equipment. The benefit doesn’t stop at smoke either. In spaces with airborne chemical hazards or biological contaminants, that steady outward airflow is often what separates a clean entry from a genuine exposure incident, which is part of why it’s become such a foundational feature across respiratory protection equipment used on the fireground today.

Real-Time Air Monitoring System Benefits

One of the more useful advances in SCBA technology, honestly, has been the integration of a real-time air-monitoring system directly into the unit. Firefighters used to have to guess at their remaining air by feel or glance down at a gauge. Now they can track air levels continuously, often right through a heads-up display inside the mask. An air monitoring system like this gives low-air warnings well before a cylinder runs dry, letting crews plan their exit instead of scrambling, and it supports smoke-inhalation prevention simply by keeping people from lingering too long on air that’s about to run out. For incident commanders, being able to watch air status across an entire crew from outside the structure adds a layer of oversight that just didn’t exist ten years ago. 

If someone’s air is dropping and they’re not answering the radio, command can send in a rapid intervention team before it turns into an actual emergency rather than a close call. This move toward tracking real data reflects a broader shift in next-generation SCBA technology, where safety isn’t just about the physical barrier between a firefighter and a hazardous atmosphere anymore. It’s also about the information available to make faster, better calls under pressure. Departments looking into fireground air monitoring have generally found that this kind of visibility shortens the gap between a low-air alert and a coordinated withdrawal, reducing the odds of someone burning through their air supply mid-operation.

How Do SCBA Communication Systems Enhance Safety?

Noise on a fireground is relentless, and thick smoke plus a bulky facepiece has always made talking to your crew harder than it should be. That difficulty has historically contributed to delayed maydays and to communication breaking down when it matters most. A firefighter communication system built into the SCBA facepiece or harness addresses much of that by enabling clear radio transmission without anyone having to pull gear off mid-fire. This kind of connected firefighter technology also helps command get a better read on what’s actually happening, since crews can report conditions, hazards, or injuries in real time rather than waiting until they’re back outside.

Add in firefighter mobility improvements from newer harness designs, and a firefighter’s ability to flag a problem no longer depends on whether they can physically reach a radio or yell loud enough over an active fire. Taken together, this is a genuine step forward for fireground safety equipment, since a solid firefighter communication system ties a firefighter’s air status, location, and voice communication into one coordinated safety network instead of leaving them as three separate things nobody’s watching at once.

Final Verdict

To sum this up Self contained breathing apparatus systems have grown well beyond their original job of just supplying air. With positive-pressure delivery, PASS device alerts, real-time air monitoring, and built-in communication, an SCBA system now functions more like a coordinated safety network than a single piece of gear. For departments weighing new equipment, these changes add up to a real improvement in how firefighters are protected, tracked, and backed up during an incident. Between hazardous atmosphere protection, a more reliable firefighter air supply, and steadier firefighter respiratory protection, the self contained breathing apparatus is still one of the smartest investments a fire service can make.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does the air supply in a self contained breathing apparatus typically last?

Most cylinders are rated for 30, 45, or 60 minutes, but that number moves around depending on how hard someone’s breathing, how much exertion is involved, and which SCBA system they’re running.

What is the difference between an SCBA and other respiratory protection equipment?

A self contained breathing apparatus carries its own independent air supply, while many other respiratory protection devices just clean the air already there.

How often should a self contained breathing apparatus be inspected and tested? 

Most departments follow manufacturer guidelines plus NFPA recommendations, which generally call for daily visual checks, monthly functional tests, and annual flow testing at a minimum.

Can a self contained breathing apparatus be used in oxygen-deficient environments? 

Yes, as it supplies its own air instead of filtering whatever’s around, a self contained breathing apparatus is built for hazardous atmosphere protection in oxygen-deficient spaces.

What factors should fire departments consider when selecting an SCBA system? 

Cylinder duration, how well the facepiece fits, how much you can actually see through it, and compatibility with a firefighter communication system.

Hochiki Training Academy launches FIREbeam course for beam smoke detection projects

by Breaking NewsFire DetectionFire DetectionFire EngineeringProducts

Hochiki Europe has expanded its online Training Academy with a free course covering the FIREbeam beam smoke detection range for large open-space application

Hochiki Europe has expanded its online Training Academy with the launch of a new course focused on its FIREbeam beam smoke detection range.

Available free of charge to registered users, the course is designed to help installers, specifiers and distributors develop their knowledge of beam smoke detection and gain confidence in specifying and installing FIREbeam systems for projects involving large, open spaces.

The course introduces both products in the FIREbeam range, including the addressable FIREbeam Xtra and the conventional FIREbeam Conex, alongside the accessories available across the portfolio. It also covers the fundamentals of beam smoke detection, which is commonly used in environments where point detection is impractical, such as warehouses, shopping centres, sports halls, museums, hotel atriums and transport terminals.

The new module forms part of the Hochiki Training Academy, a free online learning platform created for professionals working with Hochiki products, including installers, distributors, specifiers and facilities teams. Courses are completed online, allowing users to learn at their own pace from any location. Each course concludes with an assessment, with successful learners receiving certification.

According to Hochiki Europe, the Academy has grown to more than 2,000 users in just a few years and is now used by businesses across the UK, Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

Martin Green, Commercial Training and Support Manager at Hochiki Europe, said: “The FIREbeam course is another building block in the Academy library. Whether someone is new to our products or has worked with Hochiki for years, the Academy is there to support learning throughout their career, not just at the point of installation or specification.

“Because it is entirely self-paced and accessible from anywhere, our customers can build their knowledge in a way that fits around their own working day, no matter where they are based. If you have a project coming up with a large open space, whether that is a warehouse, an atrium or a sports hall, this course gives you a solid grounding in the FIREbeam range before you get started.”

The FIREbeam training course is available now through the Hochiki Training Academy.

Ramtech deploys wireless fire detection system at 2026 Le Mans race

by Breaking NewsFire DetectionFire DetectionFire EngineeringProjectsPublic Events

Ramtech has successfully deployed its wireless fire detection technology at the 2026 24 Hours of Le Mans, providing temporary fire protection across key event infrastructure and demonstrating the increasing adoption of automated fire safety systems at major motorsport events.

Working alongside event infrastructure specialist iEvent and integration partner Prodomo, Ramtech France installed a temporary network of more than 300 wireless devices, including smoke and heat detectors and manual call points. The system protected 14 team paddocks and the Genesis Hospitality Building throughout the event.

Installed on a one-month rental basis, the system delivered continuous 24/7 fire monitoring during both the event build-up and race period, with the core live system operating for one week.

The deployment follows a similar installation at the Formula 1 Hungarian Grand Prix, reflecting a broader trend among major motorsport organisers towards wireless fire protection systems that can be rapidly installed and adapted.

Bruna Esposito, Business Unit Director at Ramtech, said: “The environment at a modern Grand Prix or endurance race closely mirrors the extreme complexities of major commercial construction or industrial sites; massive temporary structures, constantly evolving site layouts, tight installation windows and millions of dollars in critical team assets. Managing these risks via manual human patrols is increasingly seen as an outdated and reactive liability.

“We are seeing a fundamental shift in how the world’s largest public events manage fire safety. Rather than relying on traditional, human-led fire watch personnel to manually patrol grounds, tier-one event organisers are embracing automated wireless safety technology to protect people and temporary infrastructure. This project represents an important milestone for Ramtech, demonstrating the trust that global event organisers place in our technology.”

Because the wireless mesh system requires no cabling or conduit, additional devices could be installed or relocated as site layouts evolved during the build-up to race day, allowing organisers to respond quickly to changing operational requirements.

Wireless system chosen for flexibility

Antoine Galicher, Project Manager at iEvent, said: “Flexibility was one of the key reasons we chose Ramtech’s WES system. For an event of this scale, we needed a solution that could deliver both reliability and ease of deployment, allowing us to adapt quickly as requirements changed. The wireless technology simplified installation while helping us maintain the high safety standards expected at Le Mans.”

Sylvain Castaignau, Business Development Manager for Ramtech France, added: “The customer was initially looking for a solution to improve fire safety but was not aware that an automated system like WES existed. From the first demonstration, it became clear that the flexibility and functionality of the system were perfectly suited to an event environment where requirements change daily. This project proves how temporary fire protection can evolve beyond traditional fire watch approaches.”

Ramtech highlights wider event safety trends

Ramtech believes the Le Mans project reflects a wider shift in temporary fire protection for large-scale events, where organisers are increasingly seeking alternatives to manual fire watch patrols.

Esposito said: “With the additional risk posed by increasing summer temperatures and prolonged heatwaves, relying on manual human labour for continuous fire watch patrols introduces major occupational health risks and soaring overtime costs. In addition, there is a heightened concern around the potential for outbreaks of fire, particularly in conditions of dry outdoor spaces, where events may be held.”

The company says the project demonstrates how wireless fire detection technology can provide flexible protection for temporary venues, particularly where layouts change frequently during construction and event preparation.

Gateway 2 lessons: Preparing construction projects for Gateway 3 success

by Breaking NewsBuilding ManagementBuilding ManagementConstructionConstructionFire EngineeringFire SuppressionIFSJ ExclusivesInspectionPassive

Quelfire shares expert insights into the key lessons from Gateway 2, highlighting common compliance challenges and how construction teams can prepare for Gateway 3

In many ways, Gateway 2 has become the new normal. It’s already changing the industry for the better, especially for teams that genuinely want to get things right. That said, the industry isn’t fully there yet.

Some still hold the mindset of “we’ve always done it this way” and approach the Gateway regime as something they have to do, rather than as something that can make a real difference in how we design and construct buildings.

From our perspective at Quelfire, it’s a much-needed change that is pushing the industry toward better decisions and safer buildings – which can only be good things, surely? In early applications, Ishfaq was surprised by the disconnect between the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) teams and the construction industry.

He highlighted that there seemed to be no established process; some BSR teams used staged applications, while others required full submissions.

Some submissions completed in early Stages 3/4 with no contractor details were approved in 12 weeks, whereas other T1 contractors, for instance, provided thorough information on specific parts of the build and waited about 9 months for approval.

Ultimately, this suggests that the BSR was still very much working out its processes during this stage. Because the introduction of the Gateways was such a significant change for the industry, the focus has naturally been on the first stop-and-go gateway, Gateway 2.

However, as the built environment transitions beyond this, the next unknown is Gateway 3, which introduces a new level of uncertainty. Ishfaq raised concerns about potential delays from Gateway 3, especially given the delays experienced with the second Gateway.

He believes it hasn’t been “road tested enough yet” to know what it will entail; the industry is still waiting for feedback.

Where are construction projects still falling short at Gateway 2?

Typically, R5 Consultants will distribute their project schedule to key parties, ready for submission at Gateway 2.

However, upon receiving the completed schedule, the team often finds gaps in expectations and information, with each party often having different ideas about elements of the project.

Ishfaq said, “The challenge with firestopping is that it’s one of the few elements of construction that is genuinely collaborative. The architect will set their position of all these walls, the structural engineer will dictate what size the openings and letterboxes can be and then the M&E engineer needs to tell you what is actually passing through and where and then you can come to a resolution on what the firestopping needs to be.” What Ishfaq and his team are finding is that they’re getting pushback from consultants due to tight deadlines and rising costs, because they haven’t given enough time to Gateway requirements.

Furthermore, Whitty argued that contractors “can’t play the system anymore” and that part of the Gateway regime is about making concrete decisions and following them through on-site.

He said that hidden costs, along with having to redesign a project two or three times, slow development and cost a lot of money to resolve.

What does good Gateway 2 compliance actually look like?

The whole reason for the Building Safety Act 2022 and subsequent Gateways is to improve building safety and protect those in them. Early fire stopping engagement is the only way to ensure this, as it brings all key parties together at the design stage to discuss key deliverables and how they’ll be achieved.

It puts fire safety at the heart of every decision, ensuring the project is designed and then built around available fire stopping tested solutions. Ishfaq said that when looking at the mechanics of what you’re going to submit, it is about design procurement alongside product and system procurement.

If contractors review the information and decide on deliverables, a systematic approach can be taken to articulate it to the regulator.

Further to this, Whitty stated that main contractors need to be clear about and commit to products and systems they want to see in the building. He also raised that you’ve got to make it easy for the regulator to say yes.

You’re taking the BSR on a journey – give examples, show the rationale behind the decisions. This also includes being in dialogue with your regulator spokesperson and finding out what’s required of you: ask the questions.

All panellists agreed that it is better for project teams to take their time at the design stage and focus on getting it right the first time. Multiple redesigns cost time and money, add project pressure and stress and ultimately slow the whole project down.

You might discover that the BSR will ask for additional information after submission. By putting in the effort beforehand, you give yourself an advantage.

Thorough design may take time upfront, but it pays off in the long run for business security and profitability. Not to mention it prioritises building safety!

How can construction teams start preparing for Gateway 3 now?

Both Whitty and Ishfaq agreed that contractors need to improve their QA process. Whitty also went on to say that it’s about the execution of what you set out to do. It’s about evidencing that what you have installed is as per what you submitted at Gateway 2.

You can’t leave it to the last minute to prove how your piling went in, for example, you’ve got to be thinking about all of these things from the get-go.

Ultimately, no one knows what Gateway 3 will fully entail, so if you’re not preparing for it, start now. Willmott Dixon is preparing for Gateway 3 by enhancing its pre-start procedures, working through key deliverables before construction even begins.

The team goes through what they are building, what they will be evidencing and how often and what good looks like. Whitty stated that having these early on-site conversations has been driving value in production and efficiency and that there is generally less conflict on site.

By working closely with supply chain partners, behaviours become apparent. Their willingness to collaborate, but also how they plan, prepare and deliver to make Gateway 3 more achievable.

Are construction projects ready for Gateway 3?

While the built environment’s focus has been on Gateway 2, it highlights one question: Are we ready for what comes next? Gateway 3 is currently the big unknown. The unknown can be scary, but especially for those unprepared.

“We’ll deal with it later” can no longer be an option, as evidence is crucial to demonstrating that what is built is what was designed for Gateway 2. That means thinking ahead now and applying all practices across all projects.

Because, at the end of the day, this is about whole building safety and protecting lives. And sticking to the agreed plan.

This article is based on Quelfire’s London Build 2025 panel discussion, titled Gateway 2: What We Know Now. Craig Wells, Sales Director at Quelfire, was joined by Graeme Whitty, National Product Director at Willmott Dixon and Nasar Ishfaq, Director, Architect and Principal Designer at R5 Consultants, to discuss Gateway 2 and what they have learned since its introduction. However, this article touches on why you should look beyond Gateway 2 to Gateway 3. It also explains how to prepare for it.

MSA Safety completes $555 million acquisition of Autronica Fire and Security

by Americas - Breaking NewsBreaking NewsFire DetectionFire Detection

MSA Safety has completed its acquisition of Autronica Fire and Security, strengthening its fire and gas detection portfolio and expanding its presence in key global markets

MSA Safety Incorporated has completed its acquisition of Autronica Fire and Security in a transaction valued at approximately $555 million, strengthening its position in the global fire and gas detection market.

Headquartered in Trondheim, Norway, Autronica designs, manufactures and supplies fire detection, gas detection and alarm systems. The company reported approximately $160 million in sales during 2025.

MSA said the acquisition supports its mission and Accelerate profitable growth strategy, while enhancing its capabilities in fixed fire and gas detection technologies.

Steve Blanco, President and CEO of MSA Safety, said: “We are excited to officially welcome Autronica to the MSA family.

“The addition of this highly complementary business accelerates MSA’s fixed detection growth strategy by enhancing our ability to deliver integrated safety solutions across critical infrastructure, energy and marine applications.

“Autronica’s geographic footprint is also complementary to MSA’s current market reach and, together with its expertise and leadership in fire and gas safety systems, positions us well to expand into an attractive, growing $3 billion-plus addressable market while delivering on our mission.”

According to MSA, the acquisition expands the company’s reach across critical infrastructure, energy and marine sectors while increasing its exposure to the global fixed fire and gas detection market.

The transaction was financed using cash on hand and borrowings under MSA’s existing credit facility. MSA also expects the acquisition to be accretive to its adjusted earnings per share in the first full year of ownership.

Pye-Barker Fire & Safety appoints President of Commercial Services

by Americas - Breaking NewsBreaking NewsPeoplePeople

Pye-Barker Fire & Safety has appointed Peter Robbins as President of Commercial Services, a newly created leadership role that will oversee the company’s acquisition activities, commercial strategy and growth initiatives across the United States.

Reporting to CEO Bart Proctor, Robbins will lead efforts to guide Pye-Barker’s acquisition strategy while helping evaluate, integrate and grow acquired businesses. The company has completed more than 200 acquisitions as part of its expansion strategy.

Robbins joins Pye-Barker from Baird, where he served as Managing Director in the Global Technology and Services Investment Banking Group. There, he jointly led the firm’s coverage of Facility, Industrial, Residential & Environmental (FIRE) services and advised on dozens of transactions across the fire and life safety sector.

His experience provides extensive knowledge of the industry’s operators, business models and market dynamics. Robbins is also a long-time advocate of Ownership Works, the non-profit organisation that partnered with Pye-Barker to establish its ALL In ownership programme, which provides employees with opportunities to build wealth through ownership.

Commenting on his appointment, Robbins said: “Pye-Barker is one of the few companies I’ve seen scale this quickly without losing what made it worth scaling in the first place. The operational rigor, the culture, the ownership — what this team has built is truly special, and I look forward to being part of its continued growth.”

Bart Proctor, CEO of Pye-Barker, added: “Peter has sat across the table from us, from our competitors, and from dozens of the businesses we’ve acquired. He understands this industry as well as anyone, but it was his commitment to the people that make this company great that truly stood out to me.

“Our growth, while rapid, is also very intentional. Peter’s growth philosophy matches ours perfectly, and I look forward to seeing what we accomplish together.”

Pye-Barker Fire & Safety is one of the largest providers of fully integrated fire protection, life safety and security services in the US. The company operates more than 250 locations nationwide, employs over 9,000 people and has been recognised as a Great Place to Work Certified organisation. It is also included in the Inc. 5000 list and ranked fourth in the SDM 100

PFAS-free fire extinguishers: future-proofing fire safety for sustainability and compliance

by Breaking NewsFire DetectionFire DetectionFire EngineeringHealth and SafetyProducts

Andy Spence of Britannia Fire explains how fire safety professionals can prepare for PFAS restrictions, reduce carbon emissions and improve whole-life value through PFAS-free technology, circular economy principles and sustainable procurement

The fire safety sector is entering a period of significant change. Growing environmental expectations, evolving regulations surrounding PFAS and increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions are prompting organisations to reassess how fire protection products are specified, managed and maintained throughout their lifecycle.

At the same time, budget constraints and supply chain considerations are placing greater emphasis on long-term value rather than upfront cost alone. Future proofing requires organisations to anticipate regulatory change, reduce environmental impact and invest in solutions that deliver long-term operational and financial benefits.

From PFAS free technologies to circular economy principles, the decisions made today will shape both sustainability performance and future resilience.

PFAS regulations and the fire safety challenge

Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), known as ‘forever’ chemicals, have historically been used in firefighting foams and fire extinguishers because of their unique ability to rapidly suppress flammable liquid fires.

However, they are under intense scrutiny as they do not degrade easily in the environment and can lead to a range of health issues, including decreased fertility, developmental delays in children, a higher risk of certain cancers and immune system suppression.

Across the European Union, regulations restricting PFAS in firefighting foams and extinguishers came into force on 23 October 2025, with a ban in most scenarios taking effect from 23 October 2030. The UK government is also taking this issue seriously.

Earlier this year the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) published its PFAS plan, which outlines key steps the government will take to understand, manage and reduce exposure to PFAS. Some action is already being taken, with the Health & Safety Executive (HSE), the agency which regulates chemicals placed on the market in Great Britain (GB), due to report back later this year on how PFAS should be phased out of firefighting foam in the UK.

The HSE is suggesting a staggered approach to phasing out PFAS in firefighting foam and extinguishers, depending on use and type. Looking at the proposed timescales for transition, it’s unlikely fire extinguishers containing PFAS would be phased out before 2031, but what we do know is that they will probably be the first to go – in part due to advances in technology and credible alternatives.

We are expecting the HSE to publish its final opinion later this year, with a decision on UK wide restrictions to follow soon after. As PFAS bans take effect across the EU and the

UK moves towards tighter regulation, those responsible for fire safety need to evaluate their existing assets, develop transition strategies for equipment containing PFAS, budget for replacement costs and manage the complex requirements associated with disposal and environmental compliance.

Transitioning to PFAS-free fire extinguishers and foams

We recognised the detrimental effects of PFAS some time ago and removed them from all our products in 2024. Since then, we have been at the forefront of shaping future fire safety regulation in the UK.

In June last year, I addressed the Environmental Audit Committee in the House of Commons, sharing our experience of phasing out PFAS with the aim of helping policymakers understand both the environmental urgency and the practical realities of a transition.

The emergence of high performing PFAS free solutions is helping to dispel the myth that switching to PFAS free is a compromise. Britannia’s lightweight, composite P50 fire extinguishers are a prime example of how the industry is evolving, combining proven fire suppression performance with PFAS free technology and a reduced environmental footprint.

They are tried and tested in the real world, meaning organisations can confidently transition away from PFAS while maintaining the levels of protection, reliability and compliance that modern fire safety demands.

Organisations need to start thinking about this now. They should review their stock to establish what needs replacing and put in place an action plan as part of their usual fire risk assessments and in accordance with their health and safety asset management plan.

If existing stock is nearing its end of life, has failed an inspection or Knowledge Partner additional units are required, make the switch and get ahead of the ban. Allow time for transition but don’t panic.

Use a reputable supplier that will support and provide advice throughout the process.

Circular economy principles for sustainable fire protection

Future-proofing fire safety requires organisations to look beyond the initial purchase cost and consider the entire lifecycle of their fire protection assets. Factors such as maintenance requirements, replacement frequency, waste generation and end-of-life disposal all contribute to the true environmental and financial cost of a product.

Adopting a lifecycle approach enables organisations to identify solutions that deliver long-term value, reduce resource consumption and minimise carbon emissions. In an era of increasing sustainability expectations, understanding the full lifecycle impact of fire safety equipment is becoming just as important as assessing its firefighting performance.

Composite fire extinguishers and long-life fire safety equipment

Traditionally, steel fire extinguishers have been the go-to solution for facilities managers and fire safety professionals, but they are prone to corrosion and therefore need servicing every year and often replacing every five years.

Composite fire extinguishers, however, are helping organisations to meet stringent waste and carbon reduction targets and simplifying fire safety. They’re made from a unique combination of durable plastic and aramid fibres, meaning they are strong, don’t corrode and therefore last 20 years.

They don’t require costly annual servicing, just simple, efficient in-house checks done as part of an organisation’s routine maintenance programme and a full refurbishment after 10 years.

They are also multipurpose, meaning organisations don’t need as many. Britannia’s composite P50 fire extinguishers are used worldwide and despite some claims to the contrary, they conform to all required regulations and standards, including BS EN3-7.

Delivering long-term cost savings Sustainable products like the P50 are well positioned to deliver long-term savings. High-quality, long-lasting equipment with reduced maintenance and replacement requirements lowers ongoing operational costs, while PFAS free solutions help organisations avoid future disposal expenses and compliance challenges associated with evolving regulations.

P50s are also multi-purpose, capable of tackling Class A and B fires as well as electrical fires, reducing the number of extinguishers needed and saving money.

By taking a whole-life cost approach, organisations can identify solutions that not only support sustainability objectives but also deliver measurable financial benefits over time.

Reducing carbon emissions across the fire safety lifecycle

Manufacturing, transportation, maintenance and end-of-life disposal all contribute to a product’s overall carbon footprint, making it important to look beyond operational performance alone.

By assessing lifecycle emissions rather than simply focusing on purchase price, organisations can identify opportunities to significantly reduce their environmental impact.

For example, selecting composite fire extinguishers that don’t require annual servicing reduces vehicle journeys and associated emissions, while products that don’t need frequently replacing, lowers the carbon costs linked to manufacturing and transportation.

They are also fully recyclable, with solar assisted, low energy manufacturing helping to minimise their carbon footprint. Choosing durable, reusable and recyclable fire safety equipment can therefore make a meaningful contribution to both carbon reduction targets and wider sustainability objectives.

Future-proofing fire safety with sustainable compliance strategies

Fire safety and sustainability are no longer separate considerations. By embracing PFAS-free technologies, lifecycle thinking and circular economy principles today, organisations can strengthen compliance, reduce costs and improve environmental performance. This will ensure that those organisations are well prepared for the challenges and opportunities of the future.