Compact water mist system for rail applications

Wagner Rail has expanded the WAGNER Group’s FirExting portfolio with the launch of Water Mist Compact, a water mist-based fire suppression system for use in passenger areas in railway carriages.

The system is said to provide high efficiency performance with a reduced space requirement and easier integration and maintenance.

Water mist systems work by releasing micro-fine water droplets that evaporate very quickly as mist, drawing heat energy away from a fire. This enables fast, effective, and gentle fire suppression with low water consumption.

“Thanks to their low water consumption, water mist systems cause very little secondary damage, making them ideal for areas where operations need to resume quickly after a fire,” explains Dr. Markus Müller, Managing Director of Wagner Rail.

“Our latest development goes one step further: it is our smallest and lightest water mist system. It can be installed in a more compact space while delivering the same performance. Both planning and integration into the vehicle are simpler than with conventional systems.”

According to Wagner Rail, the compact water mist system houses the water needed for fire suppression and the nitrogen gas required for atomisation in a single container. This is said to eliminate additional components and piping typically found in traditional water mist systems.

This design saves installation space and weight as well as reduces the number of interfaces with the vehicle. It also simplifies planning and execution of the installation process.

After an activation, the system can be replaced quickly as the containers can be kept in stock as compact replacement parts.

The system is claimed to comply with ARGE Part 2 and UNI 11565:2021, suiting it for use internationally. Since the containers can be heated or insulated, this solution is also suitable for demanding applications and operates reliably even at very low temperatures.

“Ultimately, what matters most to operators is a comprehensive package that combines safety, reliability, and cost-effectiveness,” Müller adds. “Our technology stands out for its high effectiveness, low impact on the interior, and excellent retrofitability. This makes it ideal for both existing fleets and new vehicle designs.”

Wagner Rail has begun implementing its first projects using the Water Mist Compact system, which will be showcased at InnoTrans in Berlin from September 22 to 25.

Aero-X installs fire protection systems installed for Schilthorn cable car redevelopment

Fire protection specialist Aero-X has installed systems across the redeveloped Stechelberg–Mürren–Birg-Schilthorn cable car line in Switzerland, a route known both for its engineering complexity and its connection to the James Bond film On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.

Swiss company Aero-X was commissioned to provide fire protection for the recently redeveloped line, including systems for the dual-track Funifor cable car infrastructure and electrical control cabinets at all four stations.

The company selected Kentec Sigma XT extinguishant control panels for the project, with 14 panels installed across the station cabinets and connected to the site management system for supervision from the control room.

The Schilthorn route is internationally recognised as the location of Piz Gloria, Blofeld’s mountaintop lair in the 1969 James Bond film On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. The cable car line has undergone a major redevelopment as part of the Schilthornbahn 20XX project.

Originally built in the 1960s, the multi-stage aerial cableway system in the Bernese Oberland region had reached the end of its technical lifespan and required a comprehensive modernisation programme.

The redevelopment has increased passenger capacity from 400 to 800 people per hour and reduced the travel time from Stechelberg, on the valley floor, to the Schilthorn summit by around 10 minutes. The first section, from Stechelberg to Mürren, now operates as a direct line with a gradient of 159.4%, making it the steepest aerial cable car in the world.

Paul van Trigt, CEO of Aero-X, said: “It is so steep the cable car has to exit through the roof of the station.”

Aero-X was asked to protect the cable car system and electrical control cabinets at each station. The gondolas, which feature solar panels and battery storage, are protected using Aero-X extinguishant units.

The station cabinet protection includes integrated detection and suppression systems. The cabinets are “doubled up” at each station to support continuity of service in the event of a failure, according to van Trigt.

“The reason we used Kentec panels is that we needed to fulfil certain standards, in particular EN12094, EN15276-1 and EN15276-2,” he said. “I love the XT panel because it is plug and play. Connected properly, it simply works: there is no complicated programming to be done.”

Most of the cabinets are fitted with smoke sensors, while others use heat sensors. Van Trigt explained that some cabinets contain relatively high voltage, which can create electromagnetic fields that affect smoke detection.

Each cabinet includes fire-resistant cable connections, a sounder beacon and both automatic and manual aerosol extinguishant release capabilities.

Two or three extinguishant units are installed in each cabinet and connected to the Sigma XT panel via Aero-X’s sequential activator.

“This allows us to supervise the whole line and make sure all units are triggered in the event of a fire,” van Trigt said. “Two units are triggered, then we wait two seconds, then the next two are triggered, etc.”

The sequential activator is designed to ensure multiple extinguishant units can activate when required, rather than being limited by the current supplied by the panel. Van Trigt said the approach provides a higher level of fire security in line with regulatory requirements.

Van Trigt said the main challenge was logistical rather than technical. “Taking the materials up the mountain to each respective station and installing them during the construction phase was difficult, because there was really nothing to use. We had to find other ways!”

The upgraded cable car line is now carrying passengers on the route to Schilthorn, with fire protection systems from Aero-X and Kentec supporting safety across the redeveloped mountain transport infrastructure.

Stat-X condensed aerosol systems receive marine certification

Fireaway has announced that its Stat-X condensed aerosol fire-extinguishing systems have received type approval from Bureau Veritas following evaluation in accordance with MSC.1/Circ.1270.

The approvals are supported by three certificates covering the global market, the European Union and the United Kingdom, enabling application in SOLAS-regulated marine environments across global, EU-flagged and UK-flagged vessels.

The Bureau Veritas Type Approval Certificate confirms that Stat-X systems satisfy the requirements of SOLAS 74, as amended, the FSS Code, the 1994 and 2000 HSC Codes, and IMO MSC.1/Circ.1270.

An EC Type Examination Certificate was issued under the EU Marine Equipment Directive 2014/90/EU, supporting the wheelmark pathway for EU-flagged vessels. A UK Type-Examination Certificate was issued by Bureau Veritas under the Merchant Shipping (Marine Equipment) Regulations 2025, authorised by the Maritime & Coastguard Agency.

“This approval confirms that Stat-X systems meet defined evaluation criteria for use in marine applications subject to SOLAS requirements,” said Lance Harry, P.E., President and CEO of Fireaway: “It also reflects the structured process through which performance validation, technical assessment and certification come together in practice.”

The approval covers 15 generator models across the E-series, which uses electrical activation, and the T-series, which uses thermal activation, both of which were evaluated for enclosed marine machinery spaces.

Vessel-specific installations remain subject to review and authorisation by classification societies and flag administrations in line with project-specific conditions.

Stat-X condensed aerosol systems are designed for enclosed and special-hazard environments where compact, electrically non-conductive suppression solutions are required. The systems can be applied across marine spaces including machinery compartments, control cabinets and auxiliary equipment enclosures.

Calls grow for wider hotel fire safety reforms as Scotland introduces new sprinkler rules

New hotel fire safety regulations for historic building conversions spark debate over sprinkler requirements across the wider hospitality sector

The introduction of mandatory sprinkler systems in historic hotel conversions across Scotland has prompted fresh calls for wider hotel fire safety reforms, with industry figures questioning why the new requirements do not extend to all hotels.

The regulations, which came into force on April 6, require sprinkler systems to be installed in traditional buildings converted for hotel use. The move follows a series of fatal hotel fires and represents one of the most significant changes to hotel fire safety requirements in Scotland in recent years.

However, fire safety advocates argue the legislation has also highlighted a broader issue: while some converted historic hotels must now install sprinklers, there remains no general requirement for sprinkler systems in many modern, purpose-built hotels.

The changes stem from recommendations made following the fatal fire at Cameron House Hotel on Loch Lomond in 2017, which claimed two lives and prompted a major review of hotel fire safety standards. The tragedy exposed weaknesses in fire protection arrangements and led to calls for stronger suppression measures in buildings used to accommodate sleeping guests.

While the new rules have been welcomed as a positive step, attention has now turned to evidence suggesting fire risks are not confined to historic buildings.

Analysis commissioned by the Scottish Government as part of its review of sprinkler requirements found that hotels built using non-traditional construction methods experienced a higher frequency of fire incidents and greater levels of physical fire damage than traditional converted properties during the period studied.

The findings have prompted questions over whether future fire safety reforms should consider a wider range of hotel types rather than focusing solely on historic conversions.

The debate comes against a backdrop of continuing concern over hotel fire incidents across Great Britain. More than 400 hotel fires are recorded annually, according to industry figures, equating to more than one fire every day across a hotel stock of around 9,500 properties.

Advocates of wider sprinkler adoption argue that while the latest regulations address a specific area of risk, they do not resolve concerns about fire protection standards across the wider hospitality sector.

The issue has remained in the spotlight following the fatal fire at the New County Hotel in Perth in 2023, which claimed three lives and renewed scrutiny of fire safety arrangements in hotels.

Industry campaigners say Scotland has taken an important step by introducing mandatory sprinklers for historic hotel conversions, but believe the evidence supporting sprinkler protection should continue to be examined across all forms of hotel accommodation.

As the new regulations begin to take effect, attention is likely to focus on whether policymakers are prepared to consider further reforms aimed at expanding sprinkler requirements beyond traditional buildings.

The debate is expected to continue as fire safety professionals, hotel operators and government officials assess the impact of the new rules and the broader implications for guest safety across Scotland’s hospitality sector.

Pye-Barker acquires Fire Protection Specialists

Pye-Barker Fire & Safety has acquired Fire Protection Specialists, adding integrated fire protection services to its existing fire alarm and security offerings for customers in the Northwest of the U.S.

Bart Proctor, CEO of Pye-Barker, said: “As we join forces, I’m excited for us to strengthen our customer service in Washington and beyond.”

Fire Protection Specialists serves Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and California with the installation and servicing of fire suppression and fire alarm systems for commercial and industrial customers, including education, utility, government and healthcare facilities. The company’s fire protection solutions include advanced system monitoring, system inspections and testing, and fire extinguisher service.

Fire Protection Specialists provides clean agent fire suppression systems to extinguish fire in high value spaces, such as data centers, equipment vaults and MRI/CAT scan rooms. It also supplies automatic extinguishing systems for commercial kitchens and off-road fire suppression systems for heavy mobile equipment.

The latest deal follows an extremely active 2025 in terms of acquisitions from the company, when it added 57 fire alarm, fire sprinkler, suppression and security companies to its portfolio.

Is the safety of fire suppression systems considered in BESS hazards?

In today’s era of large-scale energy storage deployment, fire safety is no longer simply a matter of “whether a fire can be extinguished.” When a lithium-ion battery goes into thermal runaway, it releases large quantities of flammable gases, including hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane.

When these gases mix with air and accumulate within confined spaces such as BESS containers, they can reach explosive limits. Once that happens, any ignition source can trigger a violent explosion.

However, one risk that has long been overlooked is that the fire suppression product itself can become the ignition source for an explosion.

Conventional fire suppression systems can become ignition sources

Conventional fire suppression systems—such as gas systems, CO₂ extinguishers and FK-5112 systems—typically contain high-pressure vessels, solenoid actuators and electrical tubing.

In the event of flammable gas accumulation inside an energy storage enclosure, if these devices activate or malfunction, their internal electrical contacts, motor operation and high-pressure discharge can generate electrical arcs, high temperatures or mechanical sparks—potentially igniting the surrounding flammable gas atmosphere.

In other words, a fire suppression system without explosion-proof design can be more dangerous in an energy storage explosion scenario than the fire itself.

Are aerosol fire suppression systems suitable for hazardous BESS environments?

Aerosol fire suppression systems have become one of the commonly used fire protection solutions in BESS due to their non-pressurised design, simple installation and maintenance and environmental benefits. So, the question is: how do aerosol units perform in potentially explosive atmospheres?

If we look at the design standards for aerosol systems, not all aerosol products are automatically suitable for use in hazardous explosive areas:

EN 15276-2:2019—Fixed firefighting systems—Condensed aerosol extinguishing systems—Part 2: Design, installation and maintenance—Clause 4.3 explicitly states: Where aerosol generators are used in potentially explosive atmosphere, the compatibility of the generator to the atmosphere for the determined lifetime should be assessed according to ATEX directive 2014/34/EU[5].

ISO 15779:2011—Condensed aerosol fire extinguishing systems—Requirements and test methods for components and system design, installation and maintenance —General requirements—Clause 4.6 similarly states: Under certain conditions, the potential for explosive atmospheres may exist. Areas where such potential may exist are classified as hazardous. Condensed aerosols may be used in hazardous areas subject to the manufacturer obtaining the specific listings and approvals for such areas from the appropriate authorities.

Only when an aerosol unit has obtained the necessary approval for use in explosive atmospheres can it be installed in BESS. This is likely a design requirement that has been overlooked within the industry.

Explosion-proof fire suppression design is becoming critical for energy storage safety

Energy storage safety is a complete, multi-layered defense: it requires preventing thermal runaway, controlling flammable gas accumulation and—most critically—ensuring that the fire suppression equipment that activates under accident conditions is itself safe and reliable.

With their non-pressurised design, arc-free operation and modular construction, aerosol fire suppression systems—after obtaining explosion-proof certification—are a fire protection solution worth prioritising in energy storage applications.

Energy storage safety is no longer just about “whether the fire can be put out.” Under the most severe accident conditions, whether the fire suppression product itself remains safe and operational is what designers should consider most. An effective system design is one that strictly follows the fire suppression system’s design standards.

Advanced fire protection systems for battery storage, offshore wind and critical infrastructure

HAFEX CEO Ufuk Can Günaydın discusses how advanced fire protection systems are evolving to support battery energy storage, offshore wind, marine operations and critical infrastructure in increasingly complex risk environments

As industries accelerate investment in renewable energy, electrification, critical infrastructure and offshore operations, fire protection requirements are becoming increasingly complex.

From Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) and offshore wind turbines to marine vessels, high-risk environments require suppression systems designed specifically for operational demands that conventional solutions may not fully address.

In this context, HAFEX, a fire protection engineering company specialising in suppression technologies for technically demanding sectors, develops and manufactures fire protection systems with a focus on reliability, certification and performance in mission-critical environments.

Led by Fire Engineer and CEO Ufuk Can Günaydın, the company has expanded internationally by developing sector[1]specific solutions tailored to challenging operating conditions, including offshore environments, battery storage installations, telecommunications infrastructure and military assets.

“The key factor has been our ability to combine engineering expertise with sector-specific fire protection solutions,” Günaydın tells IFSJ. “These industries require more than standard fire suppression; they demand reliability, certification, adaptability and a deep understanding of operational risks.”

Fire protection strategies for battery energy storage systems

As renewable energy deployment accelerates globally, HAFEX has identified BESS as a major strategic growth area.

“BESS applications are one of the most important focus areas for us,” says Günaydın. “Lithium-ion battery fires behave very differently from conventional fires, especially because of thermal runaway and the risk of re-ignition.”

To address these challenges, HAFEX has developed aerosol and clean-agent suppression technologies designed for rapid activation, early-stage suppression and protection within enclosed battery environments.

The company also places emphasis on system integration, detection and risk-based design, aiming to reduce fire spread and support safer long-term operation of infrastructure.

Fire protection challenges across offshore wind and marine infrastructure

Marine and offshore environments represent another major focus area for HAFEX, particularly as offshore wind development continues to expand globally.

“Offshore and marine environments are challenging because fire protection systems must operate under harsh conditions such as vibration, humidity, saltwater exposure, limited access and extreme weather,” Günaydın explains.

For its part, HAFEX has developed systems incorporating real-time fire detection, continuous temperature monitoring and daily reporting of environmental changes to support early risk identification.

The company protects wind turbine risk zones separately, including nacelles, transformers and electrical cabinets, allowing more targeted suppression and risk management.

This approach has already been tested in operational environments. According to HAFEX, seven discharge cases have been recorded within installations for Enel Green Power Mexico across more than 300 Siemens Gamesa wind turbines, with three confirmed fire incidents successfully extinguished.

Following these deployments, the company has expanded further into the Asia-Pacific region, where it has reported protecting more than 400 offshore wind turbines across multiple global turbine brands.

Fire suppression solutions for critical electronic infrastructure

Meanwhile, in environments containing sensitive electronic infrastructure, fire suppression requirements differ significantly from conventional industrial settings. The priority is not only extinguishing fire quickly but doing so without damaging critical assets or disrupting operations.

“For sensitive electronics, the goal is not only to extinguish the fire but also to protect the equipment and avoid damaging the electronics,” says Günaydın.

Accordingly, HAFEX manufactures a certified strontium-based aerosol suppression system designed to avoid the conductivity issues that potassium-based extinguishing agents faces, particularly strontium-based aerosols has no hydrophilic characteristics.

The company proves that it’s clean and electrically non-conductive suppression technologies are suitable for data centres, server rooms, electrical cabinets and telecommunication systems.

HAFEX also reports protecting more than 4,000 4G and 5G base stations globally. “Our approach focuses on fast detection, targeted suppression and minimal residue—nearly none—which allows critical systems to remain protected without causing secondary damage,” Günaydın explains.

Fire protection requirements for defence and military applications

HAFEX also supplies fire suppression systems for naval and air force applications, where reliability and compliance requirements are significantly more demanding than in many commercial projects.

“Defence applications require a much higher level of reliability, durability and technical compliance,” says Günaydın. “Systems must perform under vibration, shock, restricted space, temperature variation and demanding operational conditions.”

Because defence platforms often involve mission-critical assets, fire protection systems must be engineered to function consistently under extreme operational stress.

In that respect, its defence-focused aerosol generators incorporate three detection and activation mechanisms within a single unit, alongside self-activation capability at 300°C.

Preparing for future fire risks

Looking ahead, HAFEX sees one of the biggest challenges as managing fire risks associated with rapidly evolving technologies. “The biggest challenge will be protecting new technologies before risks become widespread,” Günaydın explains.

Electrification, automation, renewable energy infrastructure, data centres and high-density battery systems are all creating new fire scenarios that legacy suppression technologies may not fully address.

At the same time, they are creating new opportunities for manufacturers capable of delivering specialised and application-specific solutions. “We believe the future will require smarter, more compact, environmentally responsible and application-specific suppression systems,” says Günaydın.

ECCOTARP highlights rapid-deployment containment tanks

The ECCOTARP Self-supporting containment tanks have been designed for a wide range of applications. They can serve as emergency water reservoirs, transfer tanks, collection tanks for hazardous substances, or quarantine tanks for cooling down and extinguishing ignited EV batteries.

Their smart foldable design saves space during transport and storage, while assembly takes only a few minutes.

Integrated welded polypropylene plates ensure a firm and stable tank shape even when the tank is empty.

The company is inviting you to learn more about these multifunctional tanks used by emergency response units as well as across various industrial sectors at INTERSCHUTZ next week.

📍 Visit ECCOTARP at Booth E13, Hall 17.

ESS fire protection: how NFPA 855 and early warning systems are shaping energy storage safety

As energy storage system (ESS) deployments expand globally, Jim Dickinson of Fireaway explains how NFPA 855, early warning systems and layered ESS fire protection strategies are helping operators identify thermal runaway risks

What fire risks do energy storage systems present that fire service professionals need to be aware of?

One of the challenges is that there are many misconceptions around energy storage systems (ESS) and where those fires start. Everyone talks about lithium battery fires and the role they play, but around 90% of fires do not actually start in the battery itself. They start in the electrical areas of the ESS.

The batteries are getting a lot safer. The newer generation of batteries is improving, but if a battery goes into thermal runaway, you get a mixture of gases coming off it, and they are very difficult to deal with.

Once it gets into a deep-seated lithium fire, there is not really any product on the market that can simply put that out. At that stage, you are struggling to contain it. For us, the focus is twofold.

The first part is providing a layered fire protection approach across ESS. The first stage is prevention. We do that using UltraSense. We have an all-gas flammable sensor that provides early warning. It is UL-listed, and it gives warning before an event develops.

We can link that to the battery management system in the ESS. We do that with a number of partners globally, and that is the first key part of the approach.

The next part is detection. We use standard detection, and we work with partners to provide those detection systems Suppression is provided using Stat-X aerosol. That is designed with our engineering team to protect the areas at risk.

We are trying to get to the earliest possible stage of fire protection. The aim is to get an early indication and connect that with the battery management system, so people can get to site before the situation develops.

How do fire protection strategies vary between utility-scale ESS sites and smaller in-building installations?

Large-scale ESS sites have a lot more management around them. They are more detailed, with more energy management and more fire detection and suppression planning.

They also need more planning at local level. If you go somewhere like California, you have local authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs) making decisions around what can go in and how it can be deployed.

In Europe, it is very different. Europe does not have its own standard for this, so everybody follows National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855. That is the global industry standard.

It would be good if other standards were being presented, but NFPA 855 is the main one that is out there. It is the one we follow, and it is the one the ESS manufacturers use.

ESS fire protection: how NFPA 855 and early warning systems are shaping energy storage safety

I was in China last week, and that is the standard everybody is following there as well. Some companies say that, if they are in Europe, they need to use a European Norm (EN) version. The issue is that there is no EN approval for an ESS system.

There is no European or UK standard for that. The biggest point is making sure the risk is assessed at the early planning stage. Firefighters and fire professionals should be engaged early, as they are in the United States (US), where the local AHJ will be involved. Europe is a little different.

Australia is slightly different as well, with its own regional variations. It is a tough area, because practices vary by region. Batteries are also changing. We used to have large 40-foot containers with plenty of space to install systems.

Batteries have now become more condensed. They have improved efficiency, and systems have become smaller, more compact and lower risk.

That was one of the reasons we got into UltraSense. It allows us to offer something compact that can go into those areas and detect early. That was important for us. In the US, fire marshals are heavily involved in decisions.

In Europe and the UK, that level of involvement is generally not there in the same way. With smaller-scale systems, we see this in charging facilities and in buildings. There is a risk, but those systems are often not assessed in the same way.

We have seen buildings where people have not carried outa full risk assessment and have not properly assessed the hazard itself. That is where the issue sits.

Could you explain how condensed aerosol systems are applied within ESS environments and what they are designed to achieve?

The suppression part of the approach is Stat-X aerosol. It is designed to protect the areas at risk within the ESS. It forms part of a wider layered approach. UltraSense gives the early warning, standard detection can sit alongside that, and Stat-X provides suppression for the protected areas.

The key point is that this is designed around the risk. Our engineering team works on that design to make sure the system is protecting the right areas.

What role does early detection play in identifying thermal runaway and supporting effective incident response?

Early detection is the key to this. UltraSense can be linked to the battery management system. That allows the system to identify the cell that is starting to go off and allows everything to be shut down.

You then have standard detection alongside that, followed by suppression. That is the approach we take. The aim is to get a warning as early as possible, before the situation develops into something more difficult to manage.

How are standards influencing how ESS fire protection systems are designed and deployed?

NFPA 855 is the main standard being followed globally. Even in China, that is the standard everybody is following. ESS manufacturers are using it, and it is the one we follow.

There is no EN approval for an ESS system at the moment, so if somebody is looking for a European or UK standard, there is not one in place in that form. That means NFPA 855 has become the main reference point across the industry.

When operators or fire services assess ESS protection solutions, what factors guide decisions?

The main factor is whether the risk has been assessed properly. That needs to happen at the early stage, during planning. Firefighters and fire professionals should be involved from the start.

In the US, the local AHJ is involved in those decisions. In other regions, that involvement can be different, so the process needs to reflect local requirements. The other factor is whether the system provides a layered approach. For us, early warning should be supported by detection, with suppression designed around the areas at risk.

What lessons from recent ESS incidents should fire service professionals consider when planning for future risks?

The main lesson is that the hazard needs to be assessed properly. People often focus only on the battery, but most ESS fires start in the electrical areas. That needs to be understood when systems are planned and protected.

The other lesson is that early warning matters. If you can identify a problem early, link that information to the battery management system and shut things down, you have a better chance of managing the risk before it develops.

That applies across utility-scale systems, charging facilities and smaller systems in buildings. The scale changes, but the need for proper assessment and early engagement remains the same.

Li-ion BESS fire safety standards: how off-gas detection is reshaping battery safety regulations

As lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) deployments accelerate worldwide, Honeywell explains how evolving Li-ion BESS fire safety standards and off-gas detection technologies are transforming thermal runaway prevention and regulatory compliance

The global stationary lithium-ion (Li-ion) Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) market is entering a period of rapid expansion. Driven by net-zero commitments, grid modernisation and surging energy demand linked to AI infrastructure and data centres, the sector is expected to grow at more than 18.5%  annually through 2034, according to Global Market Insights.

But as deployment accelerates, so too does scrutiny of one of the sector’s biggest risks: thermal runaway.

Until recently, the stationary BESS industry operated in a relatively underdeveloped regulatory environment, despite the growing use of large-scale lithium-ion battery systems in utilities, data centres, telecoms and commercial infrastructure.

That began to change in 2020 with the introduction of new off-gas detection technologies capable of identifying electrolyte solvent vapours released before thermal runaway begins.

These systems represented a significant shift in fire safety strategy. Rather than relying solely on conventional fire suppression, ventilation or flammable gas detection, the industry began focusing on earlier intervention.

This technological development has since influenced a wave of new fire safety standards, product certifications and building codes aimed specifically at Li-ion BESS risks.

For fire safety engineers, OEMs, system integrators and BESS operators, understanding this evolving regulatory landscape is now critical to ensuring compliance and future-proofing installations.

Why Li-ion BESS thermal runaway demands a new fire safety approach

Thermal runaway remains the defining fire hazard in lithium-ion battery systems. Before thermal runaway, lithium-ion cells  typically vent trace amounts of electrolyte vapours and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Detecting these early warning signs can provide a critical intervention window (in some cases up to 30 minutes) to isolate affected batteries, stop charging and activate ventilation.

This shift from reaction to prevention is now being embedded into standards worldwide.

How NFPA and UL standards are reshaping Li-ion BESS fire safety

The US-based National Fire Protection  Association (NFPA), whose standards are widely referenced globally, has been central to this regulatory evolution.

NFPA 855 has become the cornerstone standard for stationary energy storage installations. The updated edition introduced stronger requirements. Notably, Annex G of NFPA 855 explicitly recognises the limitations of Lower Explosion Limit (LEL) sensors and battery voltage monitoring as thermal runaway safeguards.

Instead, the guidance highlights off-gas monitoring as one of the most effective methods for early detection, stating that cell-level detection close to or inside battery modules provides the most reliable pre-thermal-runaway warning.

The standard also notes that early detection can enable electrical isolation of affected cells, potentially stopping overheating before escalation.

NFPA 75 addresses lithium-ion battery fire risks in data centres

The rapid growth of AI and hyperscale data centres has increased reliance on lithium-ion Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs), bringing new fire risks into critical digital infrastructure.

Reflecting this, the 2024 edition of NFPA 75, covering fire protection of information technology equipment, introduced off-gas detection requirements for Li-ion UPS systems for the first time.

The standard specifies that approved systems must monitor for electrolyte vapour released prior to thermal runaway and be installed according to manufacturer instructions.

Importantly, NFPA 75 also clarifies that conventional flammable gas sensors are not suitable substitutes. At early off-gas stages, released vapours occur only in trace concentrations – often at ppm or ppb levels – far below thresholds designed for explosion prevention.This means specialised off-gas detection is necessary.

NFPA 76 strengthens Li-ion battery fire safety for telecom facilities

Similar revisions were made to NFPA 76, which governs telecommunications facilities.

The 2024 update requires approved systems to monitor electrolyte vapour release in battery installations above 20kWh where batteries are grouped within close proximity.

Upon detection, systems must automatically stop charging affected batteries and disconnect them from load.

Again, the standard reinforces that traditional flammable gas sensors are insufficient for thermal  runaway detection.

NFPA 400 ventilation requirements for Li-ion BESS fire safety

The NFPA 400 Hazardous Materials Code (2025) adds another important dimension, requiring exhaust ventilation systems to account for the density of potential vapours released from hazardous materials.

Off-gas detection systems can support compliance by automatically

triggering ventilation when electrolyte vapours are detected.

Li-ion BESS product certification evolves with fire safety standards

Alongside installation standards, product certification requirements are becoming more rigorous. The recently revised UL 2075 Gas and Vapor Detectors and Sensors standard introduces updated requirements covering detector design, construction and performance.

For off-gas detection manufacturers, this creates a clearer pathway for third-party validation of systems designed to detect lithium-ion electrolyte vapours, hydrogen and carbon monoxide.

How insurers are driving higher Li-ion BESS fire safety standards

Insurance providers have also emerged as influential drivers of BESS safety best practice.FM Global’s Property Loss Prevention Data Sheets 5-33, widely referenced by industrial operators and insurers, provide guidance for the design, operation and protection of stationary Li-ion BESSs.

The 2023 revision introduced new recommendations for thermal runaway prevention. Section 2.5.3.3 calls for early intervention systems capable of automatically and electrically isolating affected batteries when cell temperatures exceed thresholds and VOCs indicate pre-thermal[1]runaway venting.

The guidance requires FM approved VOC detectors which the new FM Approvals Standard 6540 fulfils with the establishment of dedicated testing and verification criteria for off-gas detectors certification.

This reflects growing insurer demand for independently verified detection performance in high-risk energy installations.

Why early off-gas detection is becoming central to BESS fire safety

Europe has also been active in formalising guidance around lithium-ion battery fire risks.The UK’s Fire Industry Association (FIA) was among the earliest organisations to formally endorse off-gas detection.

Its 2020 guidance on Li-ion battery fires concluded that systems capable of detecting low-concentration off-gases can provide early warning of impending thermal runaway and trigger shutdown systems to electrically isolate battery racks before escalation.

It also emphasises strategic sensor positioning to account for cooling airflow and the use of reference sensors to reduce false alarms.Meanwhile, the UK Fire Protection Association’s Need to Know Guide RE1 recommends early detection of off-gases or electrolyte vapours for critical and significant BESS installations, linked directly to shutdown and disconnection systems.

Together, these documents signal a broader European shift toward integrating early gas detection into battery fire protection strategies.

How local fire codes are strengthening Li-ion BESS safety requirements

Beyond standards bodies, regional building and fire codes are increasingly codifying these requirements. Among the earliest examples was the 2022 Connecticut State Fire Safety Code, which introduced provisions requiring systems capable of detecting electrolyte vapours at the start of battery venting, automatically shutting down affected BESS racks, transmitting fire alarm signals and activating mechanical ventilation.

Austin City Council’s 2024 Technical Building Codes, effective from July 2025, include similar requirements. For lithium-ion BESS installations above 20kWh, systems must include off-gas detection that both operates independently from the Battery

Management System (BMS) and identifies the affected rack. These provisions suggest local codes may act as regulatory accelerators, particularly in jurisdictions with fast-growing battery deployment.

New research supports off-gas detection for Li-ion BESS safety

Academic and industry research is also reinforcing the importance of early detection. A DNV study found that off-gas detection combined with automated shutdown protocols can prevent thermal runaway progression.

“Importantly, NFPA 75 also clarifies that conventional flammable gas sensors are not suitable substitutes.”

Separately, a 2024 study showed that commercial VOC sensors consistently triggered during cell venting events, even in large battery packs.

Research supported by UL Research Institutes and ESRI is also exploring improved off-gas monitoring in BESS applications, suggesting standards may become more prescriptive.

So, the stationary lithium-ion BESS sector is no longer operating in a regulatory vacuum Across North America and Europe, fire safety standards, insurer requirements and local building codes are converging around a common conclusion: early detection of electrolyte vapours is essential for mitigating thermal runaway risk.

For developers, operators and manufacturers, this means compliance is no longer simply about installing suppression systems or meeting baseline fire codes. It increasingly requires a proactive safety architecture built around prevention, early warning and automated intervention.

Supporting Li-ion BESS compliance through early off-gas detection

Honeywell’s Li-ion Tamer has emerged as one of the best-known systems designed specifically to address the early detection requirements now referenced across multiple standards and guidance documents.

Unlike conventional flammable gas detection, Li-ion Tamer is engineered to identify trace levels of electrolyte vapours released during the earliest stages of battery cell failure, before thermal runaway occurs.

This enables operators to respond earlier through shutdown, electrical isolation and ventilation strategies, helping reduce the risk of escalation. The system has been referenced throughout the industry’s regulatory evolution because it addresses a critical gap in traditional battery fire protection approaches: detecting battery distress before smoke, heat or explosive gas concentrations are present.

As BESS deployments expand into utilities, data centres, telecoms and commercial buildings, early intervention is becoming central to fire safety design. Solutions such as Li-ion Tamer can help operators and system integrators align installations with increasingly specific requirements around off-gas detection, rack-level monitoring and automated response protocols.

With regulatory scrutiny increasing, technologies that support earlier warning and actionable intervention are likely to play a growing role in helping the industry build safer, more resilient energy storage infrastructure