Fire safety at UK nuclear sites praised in European peer review

UK receives positive fire safety review for nuclear sector

The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has reported that international experts have commended the United Kingdom’s fire safety arrangements at nuclear sites following a European peer review.

According to the Office for Nuclear Regulation, the assessment was conducted under the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group’s (ENSREG) second Topical Peer Review (TPR 2), which selected fire safety as the core topic.

Although the UK no longer holds EU membership, it participated voluntarily in the process as an ENSREG observer.

The national assessment report submitted by the UK was reviewed by specialists from other countries and included input from six licensed nuclear operators in Great Britain alongside inspectors from ONR’s Nuclear Internal Hazards and Site Safety specialism.

The report was recognised for enabling a clear and meaningful peer review through transparent self-assessment findings.

Four good practices identified at UK nuclear sites

ENSREG’s reviewers noted four examples of good performance in the UK’s nuclear fire safety approach.

The Office for Nuclear Regulation stated that these included a sector-wide evaluation of combustible cladding risks, initiated to integrate lessons from the Grenfell Tower fire into nuclear facility protocols.

At Sizewell B, a verification step was introduced for hot work safety, requiring checks beyond the standard assessment and review procedures to improve work area safety.

Position monitoring systems were praised at Hinkley Point C, Sizewell B, and other advanced gas-cooled reactors.

These systems raise alerts in control rooms if fire doors forming part of compartment boundaries are left open.

At Sellafield, reviewers highlighted the use of automatic fire suppression systems on tug engines transporting material across the site.

Each example was described by ENSREG as a notable accomplishment that had been implemented effectively.

Areas for improvement acknowledged by ONR

The UK’s self-assessment also identified three areas for development, which were agreed upon by international reviewers.

According to the Office for Nuclear Regulation, one improvement concerns the need for more systematic evaluation of combined and knock-on hazards at Springfields Fuels Limited.

A second area involves enhancing the consistency between day-to-day combustible load management and the safety case for fire loading at the Dounreay Prototype Fast Reactor.

The third is the completion of a comprehensive fire safety strategy programme at Sellafield.

ENSREG noted these points as ongoing actions required for further strengthening the UK’s nuclear fire safety arrangements.

European countries developing response plans to TPR 2

The Office for Nuclear Regulation stated that countries involved in TPR 2 are now preparing national action plans based on the findings and recommendations.

Each participating country is expected to address the areas of improvement identified in their respective reviews.

The UK’s involvement was positioned as an opportunity to align practices with European standards despite not being a member of the EU.

The peer review was structured to support knowledge exchange and reinforce cross-border learning on fire protection in nuclear settings.

ONR highlights UK regulatory approach to fire safety

Diego Lisbona, Head of Profession for Nuclear Internal Hazards and Site Safety at ONR, said: “The publication of the TPR 2 findings culminates efforts from industry and ONR to benchmark UK nuclear fire safety with practices from across Europe.

“We’re pleased that UK approaches have been recognised as areas of good performance.

“The emergence of no new findings from the peer review illustrates the effectiveness of the UK regulatory regime for nuclear fire safety.”

Lisbona added: “The assessment shows that the UK’s fire safety arrangements meet expectations across several key technical areas and reflect good practice in comparison to international counterparts.

“We continue to support collaborative processes like TPR 2 to strengthen oversight and transparency in the sector.”

Fire safety at UK nuclear sites praised in European peer review: Summary

The Office for Nuclear Regulation has confirmed the UK’s participation in ENSREG’s second Topical Peer Review on fire safety.

The UK took part as an observer following its departure from the European Union.

The UK’s national report was prepared by ONR inspectors and six nuclear licensees.

ENSREG reviewers commended four areas of good performance in the UK’s nuclear fire safety arrangements.

Examples included cladding risk reviews, enhanced hot work procedures, position monitoring on fire doors and fire suppression for transport vehicles.

Three areas for improvement identified by the UK were endorsed by reviewers.

These included hazard assessment at Springfields, combustible load management at Dounreay, and completing strategies at Sellafield.

No new findings were raised during the peer review of the UK report.

ENSREG stated that participating countries would now create action plans to address findings.

ONR’s Diego Lisbona welcomed the confirmation of UK good practices and regulatory performance.

What is a First Degree Burn?

Burns are a common injury, and they can occur in a variety of settings, whether at home, at work, or during outdoor activities. 

One of the most common types of burns is a first-degree burn. 

But what does a first degree burn mean?

While these burns are typically not severe, they can still cause discomfort and require attention to avoid complications. 

Understanding what a first-degree burn is, how it differs from other types of burns, and how to treat it properly can help prevent further damage and ensure a speedy recovery. 

This article will explore what a first-degree burn is, its common causes, how it differs from other burns, how to treat it, and how long it takes to heal.

What is a First Degree Burn?

what is first degree burn

A first-degree burn is the mildest type of burn injury. 

It affects only the outer layer of the skin, known as the epidermis

This type of burn is usually caused by mild heat, such as a sunburn or a brief exposure to a hot object, and typically does not lead to permanent damage.

Characteristics of a First Degree Burn

The main characteristics of a first-degree burn include:

  • Redness: The skin may appear red or pink, especially around the affected area.
  • Pain: A first-degree burn may be painful, but the discomfort is usually mild to moderate.
  • Swelling: The affected skin may become slightly swollen, though it does not typically result in blistering.
  • Dry Skin: The skin may feel dry, and peeling can occur as the burn heals.

Since first-degree burns only affect the epidermis, they are generally considered to be minor burns that do not require medical attention unless they cover a large area or cause extreme discomfort.

What Are The Most Common Causes of a First Degree Burn?

first degree burn causes

First-degree burns can be caused by a variety of everyday situations. 

They are typically the result of exposure to heat or sun, though other factors can also play a role. 

Some of the most common causes include:

Sunburn

One of the most common causes of a first-degree burn is sunburn, which occurs when the skin is overexposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun. 

Sunburns often cause redness and discomfort, and the skin may peel after a few days as it heals.

Hot Objects

Contact with hot objects, such as a stovetop, iron, or heated metal, can cause a first-degree burn. 

The skin may redden and feel sore, but there is typically no blistering or significant damage to the underlying tissue.

Scalds from Hot Liquids

Spilling hot liquids, such as boiling water, soup, or coffee, can also lead to a first-degree burn. 

The severity of the burn can depend on how long the skin is exposed to the hot liquid, but first-degree burns from scalds are usually not severe.

Mild Electrical Burns

Electrical burns from low-voltage sources, like a faulty electrical appliance, can cause first-degree burns if the skin comes into brief contact with the electrical source. 

These burns usually cause redness and mild pain.

Friction Burns

Friction burns can occur when the skin is rubbed against a rough surface, such as when a person falls onto the pavement. 

These burns typically affect only the epidermis and are considered first-degree burns if the damage is limited to this outer layer.

How Is a First Degree Burn Different to Other Types of Burns?

first degree burn different to other types of burn
Source: Wikipedia

There are four main burn classifications based on their severity: first-degree burns, second-degree burns, third-degree burns, and fourth-degree burns. 

Each type of burn differs in how deep it penetrates the skin and how severe the symptoms are.

First-Degree Burns

As previously mentioned, first-degree burns affect only the epidermis, the outermost layer of the skin. 

These burns are usually mild and can be treated at home with basic first aid. 

Symptoms include redness, mild swelling, and pain, but there is no blistering.

Second-Degree Burns

Second-degree burns affect both the epidermis and the underlying layer of skin, known as the dermis. 

These burns are more severe than first-degree burns and typically cause more intense pain, swelling, and redness. 

Blisters may form, and the skin may appear shiny or wet. 

Second-degree burns often require medical attention and may take longer to heal.

Third-Degree Burns

Third-degree burns are the most severe type of burn. 

They penetrate through the epidermis and dermis and can affect the underlying tissue, including muscles and bones. 

These burns may appear white, charred, or leathery and are often painless due to nerve damage. 

Third-degree burns are a medical emergency and require immediate attention. 

They can cause permanent damage to the skin and may require grafting or other surgical treatments.

Fourth-Degree Burns

Fourth-degree burns are the most severe and deepest type of burn. 

These burns extend beyond the skin into the underlying tissues, including fat, muscles, tendons, and bones. 

Fourth-degree burns are often caused by extreme heat or prolonged exposure to a heat source, such as a fire or electrical burns. 

The skin may appear blackened, charred, or leathery, and the area may be completely numb due to nerve damage. 

Fourth-degree burns are a medical emergency, and immediate treatment is necessary. 

These burns can result in permanent tissue damage, loss of function in the affected area, and, in extreme cases, can be life-threatening. 

Treatment often involves surgical interventions like debridement, skin grafting, or amputation.

How is a First Degree Burn Treated?

first degree burn treatments

First-degree burns are typically easy to treat at home, as they do not cause significant damage to the skin. 

Here are some steps to follow for effective first-degree burn treatment:

Cool the Burn

The first step in treating a first-degree burn is to cool the skin. 

You should immediately run cool (not cold) water over the affected area for about 10-15 minutes. 

This will help to reduce the pain and prevent the burn from getting worse. 

If running water is not available, you can also apply a cool, damp cloth to the burn.

Avoid Ice

While it may seem tempting to use ice to cool the burn, this can actually cause further damage to the skin. 

Avoid placing ice directly on the burn or using very cold water, as it can freeze the skin and make the situation worse.

Apply a Moisturiser or Aloe Vera Gel

After cooling the burn, you can apply a moisturiser or aloe vera gel to soothe the skin. 

Aloe vera is known for its cooling properties and can help to reduce redness and swelling. 

Be sure to use a product that is free of alcohol or other harsh ingredients, as these can irritate the skin further.

Take Over-the-Counter Pain Relievers

If the burn is painful, over-the-counter pain relievers such as ibuprofen or paracetamol can help to reduce discomfort. 

Always follow the recommended dosage instructions on the packaging.

Protect the Burn from Further Damage

If the burn is located on an area that may be exposed to friction or further irritation (such as the hands or feet), you may want to cover the burn with a clean, non-stick bandage. 

Make sure the bandage is not too tight, as this could restrict circulation.

Avoid Popping Blisters

Although first-degree burns typically do not cause blisters, if they do form, it’s important not to pop them. 

Blisters act as a natural barrier against infection, and breaking them can lead to further complications.

How Long Does a First Degree Burn Take to Heal?

The healing time for a first-degree burn is relatively short. 

Most first-degree burns heal within 7 to 10 days without leaving permanent scars. 

However, the healing time can vary depending on the severity of the burn, the size of the affected area, and how well the burn is treated.

Factors Affecting Healing Time

  • Size of the Burn: Larger burns may take slightly longer to heal, although they are still considered first-degree burns.
  • Location of the Burn: Burns on more sensitive areas of the body, such as the face or hands, may take longer to heal.
  • Proper Treatment: Burns that are treated properly and promptly usually heal more quickly than those that are not cared for correctly.

During the healing process, the skin may peel as it regenerates, and the redness will gradually fade. 

Once healed, the skin will usually return to its normal colour, but it may feel dry or slightly sensitive for a short time.

Does a First Degree Burn Scar?

First-degree burns generally do not result in scarring, especially if they are properly treated. 

Since these burns only affect the outer layer of the skin, the body is typically able to heal without permanent damage. 

However, in some cases, if the burn is extensive or improperly treated, there may be a slight chance of scarring.

How to Minimise Scarring

To minimise the risk of scarring, it is essential to:

  • Keep the burn clean and avoid infection.
  • Use moisturising lotions to keep the skin hydrated during the healing process.
  • Avoid picking at the burn or peeling off the skin prematurely.
  • Protect the healing skin from excessive sun exposure, as sunburn can cause pigmentation changes and increase the risk of scarring.

Conclusion

You should now have an understanding of exactly what a first degree burn is. 

A first-degree burn is a common and usually mild type of burn that affects only the outer layer of the skin. 

These burns are generally caused by mild heat or sun exposure and can be easily treated at home. 

With proper care, first-degree burns typically heal within a week to ten days and rarely leave permanent scarring. 

By understanding the symptoms, causes, and treatment of first-degree burns, individuals can effectively manage this type of injury and avoid complications. 

If a burn appears more severe or shows signs of infection, it’s important to seek medical attention promptly.

Safety crisis at sea: Climate change is hurting this workforce the most – and they’re not prepared

Ocean workers in global spotlight over climate-related harm

Lloyd’s Register Foundation has reported that ocean workers are among the most exposed groups to climate change impacts, calling for their recognition as a frontline workforce.

According to the Foundation’s latest World Risk Poll Focus On report, 80% of ocean workers are concerned about being seriously harmed by severe weather.

The findings are based on the 2024 World Risk Poll, conducted by Gallup, which surveyed 147,000 individuals in 142 countries.

The Foundation found ocean workers were nearly three times more likely to cite climate change as a daily safety risk than those in other sectors, with 17% identifying it as their primary concern.

Lloyd’s Register Foundation is now urging policymakers to include ocean workers in national and international climate adaptation strategies, citing a lack of occupational safety and health (OSH) training as a contributing factor to increased harm.

Report outlines elevated workplace injury rates among ocean workers

The Foundation reported that one in three ocean workers (33%) said they had experienced serious harm from severe weather in the last two years.

This compares to 20% of workers in other industries.

The report attributes this increased exposure to the nature of ocean-based work, where crews operate in open and often hazardous marine environments.

A quarter (25%) of ocean workers also said they had been harmed while working in the last two years, compared to 18% of other employees.

These figures position ocean workers as the group with the highest self-reported levels of both environmental and occupational harm.

The Foundation noted that such trends reinforce the need to consider ocean workers’ vulnerability when shaping future safety policies.

Lloyd’s Register Foundation calls for improved OSH training

Lloyd’s Register Foundation highlighted that many ocean workers have not received recent occupational safety training.

According to the report, 68% of ocean workers said they have never received OSH training.

Only 25% reported having completed any OSH training in the last two years.

Nancy Hey, Director of Evidence and Insight at Lloyd’s Register Foundation, said: “Climate change is undeniably reshaping our world, leading to more frequent, and more severe weather events.

“While this will impact us all, there are sectors of the global workforce which feel its impacts more severely.

“That makes it all the more concerning that those same workers are not receiving the vital OSH training they need to keep themselves, and their colleagues, safe.”

The Foundation is calling for increased investment in continuous OSH training tailored to the specific challenges of maritime working conditions.

Stakeholders emphasise policy change and frontline recognition

The Foundation has urged governments and ocean industry stakeholders to ensure that climate policies include protections for ocean workers.

Hey added: “It is imperative that we prioritise OSH training for ocean workers and change the assumption that this must only be done once.

“Training is a continuous process, not a one-off event, which requires adequate funding and widespread industry support.

“Stronger safety standards must be tailored to the unique challenges of working on, or near, the water, including protections against severe weather and isolation-related stress.

“Without them, ocean workers, who play such a pivotal role in our global economy, will be at increasingly heightened risk as our climate continues to change.

“However, their frontline status means ocean workers will also have knowledge and expertise on how we can safely adapt to climate change, and this is learning we should look to draw on in other sectors as they are also put under increasing climate-related stress.”

Professor Maximo Q. Mejia, Jr., President of the World Maritime University, said: “Seafaring and commercial fishing have traditionally been recognised as the world’s most hazardous occupations.

“Aside from already challenging conditions that have perennially been associated with shipboard life, our ocean workers face new and even more serious risks brought about by climate change.

“The World Risk Poll provides us with important and updated data and evidence that should inform any policy designed to protect not only our ocean workers, but the planet itself.”

Mental health and isolation risks highlighted by maritime networks

The International Seafarers Welfare and Assistance Network (ISWAN) said the report reflects the intersection of physical danger and emotional strain.

Chirag Bahri, International Operations Manager at ISWAN and a former seafarer, commented: “In addition to the harsh weather, ocean workers have to deal with a variety of internal issues which lead to anxiety and stress, such as loneliness, working with a diverse and international crew, and being physically separated from their loved ones.

“This study emphasises that ocean workers are also subject to quiet storms in the form of insufficient training and fear of job loss.

“Their wellbeing is just as important as the work they do, so they should receive better training that helps to promote their occupational health and safety.

“The global economy depends on their resilience and power, and in order to safeguard the environment and humanity, we must adopt sustainable solutions.”

ISWAN stated that improving occupational support systems and mental health resources must be part of broader safety reforms.

Ocean workers most at risk from climate change: Summary

Lloyd’s Register Foundation has released its latest World Risk Poll Focus On report on ocean workers.

The data was derived from Gallup’s 2024 World Risk Poll of 147,000 people across 142 countries.

Eighty percent of ocean workers said they are worried about being seriously harmed by severe weather.

Seventeen percent cited climate change as the greatest daily risk to their safety.

This compares to 6% across other industries.

Thirty-three percent reported personal harm from severe weather in the last two years.

Twenty-five percent reported harm from work generally in the same period.

Only 25% of ocean workers have received OSH training in the last two years.

Sixty-eight percent said they have never received such training.

Lloyd’s Register Foundation has called for new safety standards and continuous training.

The Foundation wants ocean workers recognised as a frontline group in climate adaptation policies.

The World Maritime University and ISWAN have supported the findings.

Survitec Seahaven system gains BV approval

Seahaven system approved as novel life-saving appliance

Survitec has announced that Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore has issued a Review Attestation for its Seahaven evacuation system.

The attestation classifies Seahaven as a novel life-saving appliance under IMO Resolution A.520(13).

According to Survitec, the classification followed a detailed technical review by Bureau Veritas (BV).

The assessment included analysis of design documentation, performance testing, and operational calculations.

BV confirmed the system met the necessary regulatory requirements for deployment on high-capacity vessels.

Technical review confirms compliance and system performance

Survitec explained that Seahaven is designed to evacuate up to 1,060 people in under 22 minutes.

The system uses a combination of two survival crafts and four helical slides in a fully integrated arrangement.

Each survival craft holds up to 530 people and is powered by twin diesel engines certified under SOLAS and MED.

The system was tested in conditions equivalent to Beaufort Force 6 and 3-metre wave heights.

BV’s assessment confirmed Seahaven met all evacuation and operational testing requirements.

The slides were tested with individuals including infants, children, and people with reduced mobility.

BV’s review concluded the system met expectations for environmental resilience and endurance.

Industry leaders comment on regulatory milestone

Matthieu de Tugny, President of Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore, said: “The Seahaven system introduces a powerful solution for passenger evacuation, meeting evolving maritime safety needs and paving the way for wider adoption.

“Safety is always our first priority. BV is pleased to support stakeholders, like Survitec, to help make sure innovations align with global safety standards.”

Claude Sada, Chief Operating Officer at Survitec, said: “The endorsement by BV validates years of engineering, operational testing, and consultation with ship owners and yards.

“This attestation is a milestone to broader market readiness.

“It affirms not just the technical integrity of the system, but its relevance to ship operators who need smarter, safer solutions that reduce complexity and improve survivability.”

Installation, training, and environmental testing

Survitec stated that Seahaven can be installed on both newbuild and retrofit ships.

The modular system can be installed at heights up to 28 metres.

Testing confirmed the craft can travel at 6 knots for 24 hours and tow another fully loaded craft at 3 knots.

Additional tests verified performance in extreme hot and cold conditions.

The company also reported that Seahaven includes full training and service support.

Maintenance and inspection plans are aligned with SOLAS Regulation III/20 requirements.

Study shows operational and design advantages

Survitec said Seahaven has been the focus of a separate review by Foreship, a naval architecture firm.

The study was presented at Seatrade Cruise Global 2025 in Miami.

According to Survitec, the study showed that Seahaven offers benefits in space savings and operational efficiency.

The system may also reduce weight and improve installation options on cruise ships.

Survitec added that it is working with shipyards and owners to incorporate Seahaven in upcoming projects.

Survitec Seahaven system gains BV approval: Summary

Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore has issued a Review Attestation for Survitec’s Seahaven evacuation system.

The attestation recognises Seahaven as a novel life-saving appliance under IMO Resolution A.520(13).

The classification followed technical review of design, testing data, and performance calculations.

Seahaven is designed to evacuate up to 1,060 people in under 22 minutes.

The system uses two survival crafts and four vertical helical slides.

Each craft holds 530 people and is powered by twin SOLAS-approved diesel engines.

Testing confirmed the system can deploy in sea states up to Beaufort Force 6.

BV verified the system’s compliance with evacuation and performance requirements.

Slides were tested with children, infants, and persons with reduced mobility.

Environmental testing confirmed performance in extreme temperatures.

The system can operate continuously at 6 knots for 24 hours.

It can tow a fully loaded second craft at 3 knots.

Survitec developed support materials in line with SOLAS Regulation III/20.

Naval architects Foreship studied the system for design and space-saving benefits.

That study was presented at Seatrade Cruise Global 2025 in Miami.

Survitec is working with shipyards and owners to support future deployments.

Angola platform fire: Chevron warned staff of rising near-misses before Angola incident

Chevron CEO Mike Wirth warned employees of increasing safety incidents weeks before three workers died in a platform fire off Angola’s coast.

According to Reuters, Wirth issued the warning in an internal video on 29 April, stating that the number of near-misses had risen and some could have been fatal.

The company confirmed the fire occurred on 20 May on a deepwater platform around 60 miles off the Angolan coast.

The incident resulted in three deaths and 15 injuries.

Wirth’s earlier message, titled do it safely or not at all, told employees that safety must remain a priority despite internal restructuring and external pressures.

Internal video highlighted staff reluctance to report concerns

In the April video, Wirth told employees to continue reporting hazards even during periods of uncertainty.

Wirth said: “We’ve seen a concerning increase in serious near-misses, especially over the last few weeks.”

He added: “Some of these events could have resulted in fatalities.”

He acknowledged that some employees were hesitant to stop work or raise safety concerns due to the current work environment.

Wirth said: “I know there’s a lot going on right now, with changes underway both inside the company and in the world around us.”

He added: “I learned some people feel that speaking up and stopping work is risky in the current environment. It is not.”

Chevron confirmed that its top priority remained preventing fatalities and serious incidents.

A company spokesperson said: “Preventing fatalities and serious incidents is our top priority.”

Angola fire resulted in deaths and injuries

On 20 May, a fire broke out on a Chevron-operated platform located 60 miles off Angola’s coastline.

According to Reuters, three workers died and another 15 were injured.

Chevron’s 2024 sustainability report recorded 12 serious injuries and one fatality during the previous year.

Clay Neff, Chevron’s president of upstream, told staff in a 30 May video that some of the injured workers were still receiving treatment.

Neff added that an investigation into the cause of the fire was ongoing and more information was expected in the coming weeks.

Chevron said the company had since conducted safety stand-downs across its operations.

Safety stand-downs conducted in response

Following the Angola incident, Chevron initiated company-wide safety discussions.

Wirth said these stand-downs were used to pause work and focus on safety communication.

Vice President of Health, Safety and Environment, Marissa Badenhorst, said in an interview with Reuters: “We prioritize safety above production, and we show it through actually stopping production, and have the time to talk to folks and hear from them as well.”

She added: “We hear what is getting in their way, what they’re concerned about … and then we learn and we start work back up.”

The company said these measures aimed to understand workforce concerns and improve processes accordingly.

Chevron leaders reiterate risk awareness message

In his 30 May address, Neff reiterated Wirth’s earlier safety concerns.

Neff said that recent incidents across the business involved basic daily tasks and highlighted potential risks.

He said: “These were close calls where seconds or feet could have changed everything and they are stark reminders no one is immune.”

Neff called on employees to be aware of risks and ensure proper planning.

He said: “Nothing matters more than everyone going home safe.”

Chevron said it would continue investigating the Angola incident and monitoring safety practices.

Chevron stresses safety after Angola platform fire: Summary

Chevron CEO Mike Wirth warned employees of increasing near-miss incidents in April 2025.

Reuters reported that this message came weeks before a fatal fire on a Chevron-operated platform off the coast of Angola.

The fire on 20 May 2025 killed three workers and injured 15 others.

Chevron confirmed the incident occurred 60 miles offshore.

The company said some of the injured workers were still being treated.

Chevron President of Upstream Clay Neff said an investigation was ongoing.

The firm recorded 12 serious injuries and one fatality in 2024.

Wirth’s video urged employees to continue prioritising safety and speaking up.

Chevron held safety stand-downs across its operations following the incident.

Chevron Vice President Marissa Badenhorst said the company paused production to focus on safety discussions.

Neff later told staff that many recent incidents involved routine tasks.

He said these close calls were reminders of the need for vigilance.

Chevron said it remains focused on understanding the causes of the Angola incident.

The company said it will continue efforts to reinforce safety standards.

Survitec awarded €22.7m contract for dry inert gas systems

Survitec to supply LNG carrier safety systems in China

Survitec has announced that its brand Maritime Protection will provide dry inert gas systems for 24 LNG carriers under construction in China.

The company confirmed on 9 June that the contract is valued at €22.7 million and covers equipment deliveries between 2026 and 2030.

According to Survitec, the deal is the largest single order in Maritime Protection’s history and supports Qatar’s second LNG fleet expansion programme.

The systems will be installed on vessels owned by a consortium of five shipowners.

Each unit will include a high-capacity dry inert gas generator rated at 21,000 Nm³/h.

Design and delivery to span four years

Survitec stated that deliveries will be phased to align with vessel completion schedules.

The manufacturer said the systems will be installed between 2026 and 2030 across 24 ships.

It added that the project will contribute to meeting rising global demand for liquefied natural gas transport.

According to Survitec, system design maturity and operational reliability were central to the contract evaluation process.

The company noted that the order followed a multi-party selection process involving detailed technical reviews.

Bernt Øhrn, Managing Director at Maritime Protection, said: “This is a defining contract for Maritime Protection.

“It’s the largest single order in our history and reflects the growing demand for engineered safety systems in the LNG sector.”

Technical specifications and compliance

Survitec confirmed that each system includes a combustion chamber, cooler, chiller and dryer arranged in a horizontal configuration.

The company stated that this layout helps eliminate hydrocarbon risk in the seawater drain.

It added that the dry inert gas systems are designed to maintain an oxygen level near 1 percent in cargo tanks, minimising fire and explosion risk during operations such as dry docking.

Survitec explained that the design meets approval standards set by DNV, BV, ABS and Lloyd’s Register.

These approvals are required by the shipowners commissioning the new LNG carriers.

Market confidence in existing performance

Survitec highlighted that Maritime Protection has delivered dry inert gas generators for over 400 gas tankers since 2005.

It stated that more than half of those deliveries occurred in the past five years.

Knut Kaupang, Director of Sales at Maritime Protection, said: “Throughout the quotation process, it became clear that the shipowners were focused on securing a technically mature solution from a supplier with a long-standing track record in the LNG sector.

“The vessels involved are among the largest and most advanced of their type, and the equipment requirements reflect that scale.

“Our system design has been proven across a wide range of vessel types and operating conditions, which has helped build confidence among all stakeholders involved.

“When equipment is this integral to a ship’s infrastructure, owners need to have certainty in the design, the delivery capability, and the long-term support behind it.”

Industry relevance and contract background

Survitec reported that the contract was awarded following an extended negotiation period.

It stated that performance history, system maturity and lifecycle support were all key evaluation criteria.

The LNG carriers form part of a wider expansion programme aiming to support increased liquefied natural gas distribution worldwide.

Maritime Protection is responsible for engineering, manufacturing and service delivery across the lifecycle of the supplied systems.

The company noted that its integrated delivery model was a factor in the contract decision.

Survitec awarded €22.7m contract for dry inert gas systems: Summary

Survitec announced a €22.7 million contract to supply dry inert gas systems.

The contract was awarded to Survitec’s brand Maritime Protection.

It covers 24 LNG carriers being built in China for five shipowners.

The project is part of Qatar’s second LNG fleet expansion programme.

Deliveries will occur between 2026 and 2030.

Each system includes a 21,000 Nm³/h dry inert gas generator.

System design includes a combustion chamber, cooler, chiller and dryer.

The layout eliminates hydrocarbon risk in the seawater drain.

The systems are approved by DNV, BV, ABS and Lloyd’s Register.

They are used to maintain oxygen levels of around 1 percent.

This reduces explosion and fire risk during cargo operations.

The contract followed a competitive evaluation and negotiation process.

More than 400 tankers have been fitted with Maritime Protection systems since 2005.

Over half were delivered in the past five years.

Survitec stated that design maturity and lifecycle support influenced the contract award.

Crew evacuates cargo ship carrying 800 electric vehicles near Alaska after firefighting system failure

Cargo ship carrying electric vehicles catches fire off Alaska

A fire broke out on the cargo ship Morning Midas while it was transporting 3,000 vehicles from China to Mexico, including 800 electric vehicles, according to AP News.

The fire began Tuesday on a deck loaded with electric vehicles while the vessel was in the North Pacific Ocean, about 300 miles southwest of Adak Island, Alaska.

The 22 crew members aboard were forced to abandon the ship after firefighting systems failed to control the blaze.

They evacuated into a lifeboat and were rescued by a nearby vessel, the Cosco Hellas, the U.S. Coast Guard confirmed.

Emergency response and rescue operation

The U.S. Coast Guard reported that it deployed aircrews to Adak Island and dispatched a vessel to the scene.

Rear Admiral Megan Dean, commander of the Coast Guard’s Seventeenth District, said in a statement that the immediate search and rescue mission had concluded.

Rear Admiral Dean said: “We are grateful for the selfless actions of the three nearby vessels who assisted in the response and the crew of motor vessel Cosco Hellas, who helped save 22 lives.”

Zodiac Maritime, the ship’s London-based management company, confirmed that firefighting efforts were initiated onboard but failed to bring the fire under control.

The company stated: “The relevant authorities have been notified, and we are working closely with emergency responders with a tug being deployed to support salvage and firefighting operations.

“Our priorities are to ensure the continued safety of the crew and protect the marine environment.”

Ongoing investigation and vessel status

As of Wednesday afternoon, the U.S. Coast Guard reported that smoke continued to emanate from the vessel.

It added that the fire’s status remained unclear.

Zodiac Maritime is coordinating with response teams to assess the condition of the vessel and develop a recovery plan.

The Morning Midas was built in 2006, is 600 feet long, and sails under a Liberian flag.

It departed Yantai, China, on 26 May, and was en route to the Pacific port of Lazaro Cardenas in Mexico.

Broader context on shipping safety

The incident follows a similar case in 2023 when a ship carrying 3,000 vehicles, including 500 electric vehicles, caught fire en route from Germany to Singapore.

That fire resulted in one fatality and caused extensive damage, prompting the Dutch Safety Board to call for stronger emergency response measures on North Sea shipping routes.

Concerns have been raised over the risks associated with electric vehicles and other cargo transported by sea.

More than 80% of international trade by volume is shipped by sea, with many modern cargo vessels exceeding 300 metres in length.

Ship fire off Alaska: Cargo vessel crew evacuated: Summary

A cargo ship caught fire off the coast of Alaska on Tuesday while transporting 3,000 vehicles.

The ship was carrying 800 electric vehicles on board.

The vessel, Morning Midas, was located 300 miles southwest of Adak Island.

The fire originated from a deck loaded with electric vehicles.

The crew attempted to control the fire using the onboard fire suppression system.

They were unsuccessful and abandoned ship.

All 22 crew members were rescued by the merchant ship Cosco Hellas.

The ship is managed by Zodiac Maritime, based in London.

Zodiac Maritime confirmed a tug is being sent for salvage efforts.

The U.S. Coast Guard dispatched aircrews and a vessel to the scene.

Smoke was still visible from the ship as of Wednesday afternoon.

The vessel was en route from Yantai, China, to Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico.

The ship was built in 2006 and sails under a Liberian flag.

Rear Admiral Megan Dean praised the rescue efforts.

The fire is being compared to a 2023 North Sea incident involving electric vehicles.

Shipping industry experts are examining marine fire risks related to vehicle transport.

What is a Third Degree Burn?

A third-degree burn is one of the most severe type of burn. 

But exactly what is a third degree burn?

It affects all layers of the skin, and can cause serious damage to tissues beneath. 

These burns require immediate medical attention, as they can lead to lasting damage and complications. 

In this article, we will discuss what a third-degree burn is, its causes, treatments, healing time, and potential scarring.

What is a Third Degree Burn?

A third-degree burn is the deepest type of burn injury. 

It affects the epidermis, dermis, and sometimes the subcutaneous tissue (fat and muscle). 

This kind of burn causes the skin to become charred, white, or leathery. 

The skin may also look dry and may not bleed. 

Because the damage extends to nerve endings, a third-degree burn might not be as painful initially as a first- or second-degree burn. 

However, it is extremely serious.

In third-degree burns, nerve endings are often destroyed, leading to numbness in the area. 

This is why the burn may not cause much immediate pain. 

These burns can also affect underlying tissues, such as muscles, tendons, and bones.

They may require significant treatment, such as skin grafts or even surgery, depending on the severity.

What Are The Most Common Causes of a Third Degree Burn?

causes of third degree burn

Third-degree burns are usually caused by extreme heat or chemicals. 

Below are some of the most common causes:

Flames

One of the most common causes of third-degree burns is fire. 

Whether from a house fire, an explosion, or being caught in flames, direct exposure to fire can quickly cause severe burns. 

Clothing that catches fire can also lead to third-degree burns.

Hot Liquids or Steam

Hot liquids, such as boiling water or oil, can cause third-degree burns if they are spilled or splashed onto the skin. 

Prolonged contact with hot steam can also cause serious burns, especially in areas like the face and chest.

Electrical Burns

Electricity can cause severe burns when it passes through the body. 

These burns can cause deep tissue damage and even cardiac arrest. 

Electrical burns usually occur when someone comes into direct contact with a live electrical source.

Chemical Burns

Certain chemicals can cause third-degree burns if they come into contact with the skin. 

Acids and alkalis, for example, can cause serious burns. 

Chemical burns may occur in industrial settings or due to household cleaners.

Radiation Burns

Exposure to radiation, such as from sunburns or radiation therapy, can also lead to third-degree burns. 

Sunburns from prolonged sun exposure, especially in sensitive areas, can reach this level of severity in extreme cases.

How Is a Third Degree Burn Different to Other Types of Burns?

how third degree burn different
Source: Wikipedia

There are different classifications of burns, based on their severity. 

Third-degree burns are the most serious, affecting deeper layers of skin and tissue. 

Here’s how they differ from first- and second-degree burns:

First-Degree Burns

A first-degree burn affects only the outer layer of the skin, the epidermis

The skin becomes red, sore, and may peel after a few days. 

These burns are mild, and usually heal within a week. 

They rarely cause scarring.

Second-Degree Burns

A second-degree burn affects both the epidermis and the dermis

These burns cause blisters, pain, and swelling. 

They can lead to deeper damage and may require weeks to heal. 

Second-degree burns often leave scarring but are not as severe as third-degree burns.

Third-Degree Burns

A third-degree burn is the most severe. 

It damages all layers of the skin and may affect muscles, tendons, and bones. 

The skin may appear white, charred, or leathery, and it may feel numb due to nerve damage. 

Third-degree burns require immediate medical treatment and can result in long-term scarring, disability, and loss of function.

How is a Third Degree Burn Treated?

A third-degree burn requires immediate medical attention.

It is important to follow the right steps to prevent complications and promote healing. 

Here’s how third-degree burns are typically treated:

Call for Help

If you or someone else suffers a third-degree burn, call emergency services immediately. 

This is a life-threatening situation, and professional medical help is essential.

Stop the Burning Process

If the burn is caused by fire, stop, drop, and roll to extinguish the flames. 

If the burn is caused by chemicals, remove any contaminated clothing and rinse the area with water (unless directed otherwise by medical personnel). 

For electrical burns, ensure the person is no longer in contact with the electrical source before offering help.

Cover the Burn

While waiting for medical help, cover the burn with a sterile, non-stick dressing or a clean cloth. 

This helps protect the area from infection and reduces pain. 

Avoid using ice or applying any ointments, as they can worsen the damage.

Monitor for Shock

A person with a third-degree burn may go into shock. 

Signs of shock include rapid breathing, weak pulse, and pale or clammy skin. 

If this happens, lay the person flat, raise their feet, and keep them warm until help arrives.

Hospital Treatment

In the hospital, doctors will assess the burn and may perform treatments like fluid resuscitation (to replace lost fluids), debridement (removal of dead tissue), and skin grafts (to cover large areas of damage). 

Pain management is a priority.

How Long Does a Third Degree Burn Take to Heal?

how long third degree burn heal

Healing time for a third-degree burn depends on its severity and the treatment required. 

These burns are serious, and full recovery may take weeks, months, or even longer.

Initial Healing

The immediate response to a third-degree burn is to stabilise the person and prevent infection. 

The skin and underlying tissues will begin to heal, but the process can take a long time. 

Skin grafts may be needed to replace the damaged skin, especially if the burn is large.

Recovery Time

For most third-degree burns, healing can take weeks to months. 

Smaller burns might heal faster, but larger burns can require ongoing treatment and rehabilitation. 

A person may need physical therapy to regain strength and mobility.

Long-Term Care

Even after the burn heals, the person may need continued care to address complications like infection, scarring, or loss of function. 

Ongoing medical treatment may be necessary to improve the appearance of scars and restore skin function.

Does a Third Degree Burn Scar?

Yes, third-degree burns almost always cause scarring. 

The deeper the burn, the more likely it is to cause permanent scarring. 

The skin may form thick, keloid scars, or it may be contracted, causing the skin to tighten.

Scar Treatment

While third-degree burn scars can be severe, treatment can help minimise their appearance. Scar treatment options include:

  • Pressure garments to help flatten scars
  • Surgical revision to improve the appearance
  • Laser therapy for scar reduction
  • Physical therapy to prevent skin tightening

It’s important to follow medical advice to improve scar healing and prevent long-term complications.

Conclusion

You should now have more of an understanding of exactly what is a third degree burn. 

A third-degree burn is a serious injury that can cause extensive damage to the skin and underlying tissues. 

Immediate medical care is essential to prevent complications, promote healing, and reduce scarring. 

With proper treatment and ongoing care, people can recover from third-degree burns, though healing time is long, and scarring is inevitable. 

If you or someone you know suffers a third-degree burn, seek medical help immediately.

Hong Kong shipping regulations revised for IMO compliance

Amendments reflect updated international maritime safety standards

The Government of Hong Kong has announced amendments to nine sets of shipping-related regulations.

According to the Government of Hong Kong, the legislative updates align domestic shipping legislation with three conventions from the International Maritime Organization (IMO): the 1974 Safety of Life at Sea Convention, the 2004 Ballast Water Management Convention and the 1973 MARPOL Convention on pollution prevention.

The changes were published in the Government Gazette on May 23 and are intended to improve safety, environmental protection and operational standards across Hong Kong’s maritime sector.

Nine shipping regulations updated to reflect international requirements

The Government of Hong Kong confirmed that the updated rules affect nine legislative instruments under the Merchant Shipping Ordinances (Cap. 369, Cap. 413 and Cap. 548).

These include safety regulations for grain transport, navigation, vessel construction, fire protection, and polar operations, as well as pollution reporting, air pollution control, ballast water management and local vessel rules.

The amendments introduce provisions on the safe carriage of grain cargo, requirements for reporting lost or drifting freight containers, and new measures concerning shipboard lifting equipment.

Environmental and safety protocols strengthened

The Transport and Logistics Bureau stated that the legislative amendments address fire prevention, fire suppression, and requirements for protecting specific compartments on vessels.

Additional provisions also cover navigation planning for ships operating in polar waters and mandate new procedures for packaging, documentation and labelling of dangerous goods.

Fuel-related regulations now require bunker delivery notes for low-flashpoint and gas fuels, along with rules for electronic ballast water record-keeping.

Legislative Council and stakeholders consulted

The Government of Hong Kong said that the proposed changes were tabled for negative vetting in the Legislative Council on May 28.

According to the Government, the Panel on Economic Development, the Hong Kong Fleet Operation Advisory Committee and the Local Vessels Advisory Committee of the Marine Department were consulted on the draft.

The Transport and Logistics Bureau reported that local fuel oil suppliers were also consulted and supported the proposed measures.

A spokesperson for the bureau said: “As an Associate Member of the IMO, Hong Kong is committed to fulfilling our responsibilities to support the protection of the marine environment and the prevention of pollution, as well as to promote safe navigation.

“The proposed legislative amendments will keep our local laws up to date and in line with international standards on those fronts.”

Hong Kong shipping regulations revised for IMO compliance: Summary

The Government of Hong Kong has amended nine shipping regulations under the Merchant Shipping Ordinances.

The amendments align local laws with IMO conventions on safety and pollution control.

The updated regulations address grain carriage, navigation, vessel construction and polar operations.

New rules cover reporting lost freight containers and managing lifting appliances.

Fire prevention and compartment protection standards have been revised.

Dangerous goods handling and documentation procedures have been updated.

Fuel-related requirements include bunker delivery notes and ballast water record verification.

The amendments were tabled for negative vetting in the Legislative Council on May 28.

Stakeholders consulted included legislative committees, advisory bodies and fuel suppliers.

The Transport and Logistics Bureau said the changes align Hong Kong with international maritime standards.

Survitec warns of 2026 deadline for fire protection rules on RORO and ROPAX ships

New SOLAS rule requires water monitors on vehicle decks

Survitec has reported that amendments to international maritime fire safety regulations will come into force on 1 January 2026, requiring fixed water monitors on weather decks of RORO and ROPAX ships.

The change was approved at the International Maritime Organization’s 107th Maritime Safety Committee session and modifies SOLAS Chapter II-2 and the FSS Code.

The regulatory update responds to the growing number of fires involving vehicle cargo, including incidents with electric vehicles, which have shown the limitations of current fire suppression systems.

Survitec outlines fire risks and design constraints

According to Rafał Kołodziejski, Head of Product Support and Development – Fire Systems at Survitec, the layout of vehicle decks increases the risk of fire escalation.

Kołodziejski said: “The open and expansive nature of vehicle decks means that a fire can escalate very quickly, potentially spreading across the entire length of the ship.

“This incoming regulatory requirement puts a renewed focus on practical fire suppression systems that can be deployed quickly and effectively to extinguish or control a fire in these large, open deck spaces.”

Fixed water monitors are intended to provide targeted coverage beyond what is possible with sprinkler or deluge systems, especially in areas that are hard to retrofit.

Technical specifications for compliance explained

Survitec noted that the new rules will require two fixed water monitors for ships with a breadth of less than 30 metres and four for ships wider than this.

Each monitor must deliver at least 2.0 litres per minute per square metre, with a total minimum flow rate of 1,250 litres per minute.

The company added that options exist for manually operated, self-oscillating, hydraulic, and electrically controlled systems, offering shipowners choices suited to their vessel configurations.

Equipment selection depends on layout and usage

Michał Sadzyński, Product Manager at Survitec, explained that choosing the correct system is dependent on several operational factors.

Sadzyński stated: “Understanding how to interpret and apply the new rules is as important as the technical specification of the equipment itself.

“We can advise customers on the various monitor types that can be implemented to meet the new requirements, including manually operated, self-oscillating, hydraulic, and electrically controlled systems.

“Each type brings different advantages depending on the ship’s configuration, operating conditions, and available firefighting infrastructure.”

He added that material durability and ease of maintenance are important considerations, particularly for ships operating in challenging environments.

Fixed monitors seen as key to faster suppression

Kołodziejski added that early detection remains a critical safety factor, but rapid suppression using fixed monitors provides a necessary secondary defence.

Kołodziejski said: “Prevention is always better than cure, especially where EV fires are concerned.

“Early monitoring and detection of fire remain key safety factors, but fixed water monitors can play a vital role in supporting a rapid, targeted response to contain and suppress fire.”

He also noted: “Many in the industry are still unaware of the upcoming 2026 deadline.

“As the Team Trusted to Protect Lives, we welcome the opportunity to support our customers with this important development.

“While the regulation change represents a technical requirement, it is also a vital step forward in protecting lives and assets at sea.”

Fire safety regulations for RORO and ROPAX ships to change from 2026: Summary

Survitec has reported that new IMO rules for RORO and ROPAX ships will take effect from 1 January 2026.

The regulations will require fixed water monitors on vehicle decks under changes to SOLAS Chapter II-2 and the FSS Code.

The change follows fires involving vehicle cargo, including electric vehicles.

Survitec explained that deck layout affects fire escalation and suppression requirements.

Fixed monitors offer targeted coverage that can be more effective than traditional systems.

Ships under 30 metres wide must install two monitors.

Ships 30 metres or wider must install four monitors.

Each monitor must deliver a flow of at least 2.0 litres per minute per square metre.

Total flow from all monitors must be at least 1,250 litres per minute.

Survitec stated that both manual and remote-controlled options are available.

Environmental conditions, ship design, and water supply all influence equipment selection.

Survitec warned that many operators may be unaware of the deadline.

The company is offering technical advice to help ensure compliance.