Built to move: The difference behind Lamella in curtain wall fire protection

In facade design, passive fire protection must perform over time in real building conditions, not just in testing.

This is especially important in curtain wall construction, where facades accommodate movement from wind loads, thermal expansion, and structural deflection. In these cases, a firestop or perimeter seal must do more than fit at installation. It must maintain the seal over time as the building moves.

This is where a Lamella material offers something distinctly different.

Fire protection must do more than achieve fire resistance

Passive fire protection performance depends on more than fire rating alone. It must also maintain the right form, fit, and compressibility over the life of the system.

Some standard stone wool solutions use a horizontal fiber structure. While stable, this can reduce their ability to accommodate repeated lateral compression over time. As movement and compression continue, internal fiber bonds can break down, reducing the product’s ability to recover and potentially allowing gaps to form between the fire protection and the facade or slab edge.

In curtain wall systems, where movement is expected, that loss of recovery can become a critical performance issue. Passive fire protection must remain closely fitted between the facade and the floor slab or inner construction, maintaining integrity as those elements move relative to one another. If the material cannot flex, recover, and sustain contact, the long-term effectiveness of the seal may be at risk.

A material engineered differently

Siderise® developed its own unique Lamella to address these real-world demands. Rather than using a conventional horizontal fiber structure, Siderise Lamella is manufactured from a specially formulated stone wool with vertically oriented fibers. This vertical arrangement allows the product to better withstand lateral compression and to recover more reliably from movement. Accelerated age testing in accordance with EOTA Technical Report 024 has demonstrated that Siderise’s Lamella structure can be repeatedly laterally compressed without loss of recovery or flex.

A smarter experience on site

Lamella also brings practical advantages. The integrated foil facing is clearly marked on top/bottom, and with the fibers already oriented vertically, it significantly reduces the risk of installer error.

Traditional solutions can also require application of spray, with insulation cut and compressed onsite before being sealed with an elastomeric compound. Because Siderise’s product is pre-compressed in the factory, Lamella and the applied foil scrim provide such a high level of fire resistance that an additional wet seal is unnecessary. As that compression is applied, the facing visibly wrinkles, providing a visual indicator that the product has been installed correctly.

Built for the reality of modern facades

Siderise Lamella is engineered to maintain form, fit, and integrity in building envelope applications where movement is inevitable. In curtain wall systems, where small gaps can have significant consequences, that ability to move with the building is a critical performance requirement.

Learn more about the innovation behind Lamella at www.siderise-us.com/lamella

Navy Shore Enterprise announces 2025 Fire and Emergency Services Award winners

Commander, Navy Installations Command has announced the Calendar Year 2025 Navy Fire and Emergency Services (F&ES) Award winners, recognising fire and emergency personnel across the Navy Shore Enterprise for operational excellence and mission support.

The awards highlight teams and individuals responsible for emergency response across U.S. Navy installations worldwide, including structural fire suppression, aircraft rescue, hazardous materials containment and emergency medical response. According to the command, these capabilities are central to maintaining readiness across shore installations and supporting fleet operations.

By carrying out life-saving medical interventions and rapid emergency response operations, Navy F&ES teams help ensure that bases remain operational so that naval forces can train, deploy and conduct missions.

“Our personnel are the cornerstone of base resilience,” said CAPT Bill Lane, deputy director of CNIC operations. “Protecting our people and our tactical assets is essential for projecting power from the Shore Enterprise. These winners represent the best of the best in ensuring our mission remains uninterrupted.”

From this year’s recipients, three Navy representatives advanced to top honours in broader military competition at the Department of War (DoW) level: Naval Support Activity Annapolis; Katsuhiro Watanabe of Commander Fleet Activities Yokosuka; and Metro San Diego, a regional fire and emergency services organisation covering Naval Base San Diego, Naval Base Coronado, Naval Base Point Loma, and Naval Air Station North Island.

The awards span multiple categories recognising performance across different installation sizes and specialties.

Navy Shore Enterprise awards in full

In the Small Fire Department of the Year category, Naval Support Activity Annapolis received the DoW-level award, with Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay named runner-up. For Medium Fire Department of the Year, Naval Station Mayport was selected as winner, followed by Joint Region Marianas.

Metro San Diego FES earned the Large Fire Department of the Year award, with Navy Region Northwest as runner-up. Joint Region Marianas was also recognised for Fire Prevention Program of the Year, alongside Navy Region Mid-Atlantic District 3, Naval Air Station Oceana, and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek–Fort Story as runners-up.

Individual awards highlighted firefighters, officers, instructors and emergency medical personnel across the fleet. ABH2(AW) Kiara Robin of Naval Station Rota was named Military Firefighter of the Year runner-up, while ABH2(AW/SW) Joshua Acuna of Metro San Diego was also recognised. Civilian Firefighter of the Year went to Katsuhiro Watanabe of Commander Fleet Activities Yokosuka (DoW winner), with Ahmed Dakail of Naval Support Activity Bahrain named runner-up.

Other honours included ABH1(AW/SW) Leaundre Johnson of Naval Support Activity Naples as Military Fire Officer of the Year winner, and Eric Boggess of Naval Station Mayport as Civilian Fire Officer of the Year winner. Additional categories recognised training, inspection, EMS provision, and fire prevention leadership across multiple installations.

The Navy also recognised legacy contributors to the Fire and Emergency Services community through Hall of Fame inductions. Inductees included retired fire chiefs and senior leaders such as Ruben Perez, Edward Stillwell, David Inman, William Casey, Kenneth Snyder, and Jack Woodard (deceased), reflecting long-term service across multiple regions.

Lifetime Achievement Awards were also presented to senior leaders including Rodolfo Gonzales, William Killen, Christopher Connelly, and Daniel Gaumont, acknowledging decades of service within Navy fire and emergency operations.

Commander, Navy Installations Command oversees global Navy shore installation management, including infrastructure development, sustainment and quality of life programmes. The organisation manages 10 Navy regions and more than 70 installations, employing over 48,600 personnel focused on readiness, training and support for fleet operations.

According to the command, Navy installations function as operational platforms essential to supporting global naval missions and maintaining overall fleet readiness.

Closing the gap before combustion: Can Sonic Fire Tech replace traditional residential sprinklers?

Remington Hotchkis, Chief Commercialization Officer at Sonic Fire Tech, outlines how infrasound systems detect ignition signatures and deploy targeted acoustic suppression

Wildfires across California and other fire-prone regions increasingly spread through wind-driven embers that travel far ahead of the main fire front.

Structures can ignite even where vegetation has been cleared, because existing protection measures often activate only after combustion has already begun.

Most building systems depend on heat detection, water-based suppression or manual response, leaving a gap between the arrival of embers and the moment a system reacts.

This problem has encouraged interest in approaches that interrupt ignition earlier in the fire chain.

One proposal focuses on infrasound, a form of low-frequency acoustic energy that operates below the range of human hearing.

Sonic Fire Tech is developing systems that use targeted infrasound to interfere with the combustion process and suppress ignition without water or chemical agents.

The technology is being explored for homes, critical infrastructure and operational firefighting tools.

IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey sat down with Remington Hotchkis, Chief Commercialization Officer at Sonic Fire Tech, to discuss how infrasound fire prevention systems are intended to work and where they could be applied.

The term infrasound may be unfamiliar to many readers; how would you describe it, and why did you decide to use it for fire prevention?

Infrasound refers to low-frequency sound waves that are below the audible range of human hearing.

Since it is inaudible, it does not create noise pollution or interfere with electronics.

Household pets, or everyday life.

We chose infrasound because of its effectiveness and that it allows us to address fire risk without causing collateral damage.

How do you believe infrasound interacts with embers or the surrounding air in a way that could stop ignition before a flame forms?

Fire requires three elements: heat, fuel, and oxygen.

When these combine in the right conditions, combustion begins.

Our infrasound technology disrupts this chemical reaction.

The acoustic waves create rapid oscillations in the surrounding air, which interfere with the combustion process by destabilizing the oxygen-fuel interaction.

In simple terms, the sound waves vibrate oxygen at a rate that the chemical reaction of fire can’t take hold, thereby preventing the flame from sustaining itself.

Our early testing has shown when our system is deployed against airborne embers, the soundwaves act as a forcefield which the embers reflect from.

When they land on the ground, they then decay rapidly.

With connective fuels, we also see that combustion process is stopped, such as a wood fence that connects two structures, in the areas that our frequency is being deployed on.

When you install your residential system, what parts of a home are you protecting first, and why those areas?

We have been focused on testing and promoting that our technology is being developed for the exterior wildfire defense of homes.

But builders, insurers, architects, and homeowners realize that we must continue our path proving the technology in 80-100mph winds, ember storms, and 40ft flames 10ft away from another structure that’s burning.

Though initial testing shows we create essentially a sonic forcefield around a structure that mitigates the threat of common ignitions.

The market unanimously has asked, “can you protect the interior of a home from internal residential fires in place of water sprinkler systems?” And the answer is YES.

Because we can detect the flame much quicker, we can respond immediately and suppress a small fire in its earliest state rapidly, without collateral damage of water.

And the best part, no possibility of water leaks ever occurring, which is a well-known liability of internal based water sprinklers.

Further, the homes that burned in LA County are required to integrate water sprinklers to meet the NFPA 13-D mandate in California.

But the water infrastructure is not adequate to provide ample water pressure to meet the mandated system.

So, homeowners who are rebuilding are forced to purchase an upgraded water meter for $20,000 and up, just to meet the sprinkler code mandate.

Turns out, validating our technology on the internal residential path enables a strategic approach to delivering a solution to the market as a foundational pillar to validating our technology in defending the exterior of homes during a wildfire conflagration event.

How does the system know when to activate, and what happens in the moments after it does?

The system is designed to operate autonomously.

FM-certified IR3 sensors continuously scan for early ignition signatures, including fire chemical traces and ember activity.

These sensors feed data into our AI-driven detection system, which evaluates risk conditions in real time.

When the thermal conditions exceed a defined threshold, the system deploys automatically with no human intervention required.

Activation occurs well before traditional sprinkler systems would engage, which typically happens only after flames are fully established.

Once activated, targeted infrasound waves are emitted to interrupt combustion or decay embers on the exterior of a home.

The process leaves no residue, does not alter oxygen levels in living spaces, and does not interfere with electronics or indoor air quality.

It is a silent, rapid-response system designed to act in seconds.

Beyond individual houses, what kinds of sites are you exploring for larger-scale protection, and what makes those sites different from a typical home?

While residential protection is central to our mission, the same core science applies to a range of environments.

We are currently developing our technology to meet all industry demands that water-sprinkler based fire suppression systems currently meet.

We are engaging in commercial pilots this year with several forward-thinking customers who require the most sensitive fire detection and who see the clear benefit of no collateral damage.

In most cases, we are installing our system as a voluntary system that acts as the first stage suppression tech in advance of being certified.

You have also mentioned equipment intended to be carried by people working in fire-prone areas; what problem is that meant to solve, and who might use it?

The Sonic Backpack is designed as a lightweight, portable tool for firefighters and first responders for use on small fires in wildland or urban environments.

In urban areas we are seeing potential for success in extinguishing small rubbish fires., which in Los Angeles account for 120+ calls weekly.

In wildland applications, hot shot crews use 5-gallon initial attack packs, which are quickly depleted and require refilling.

Our backpack unit eliminates that dependency on refilling.

It allows continuous operation for extended periods without water refills and avoids chemical exposure.

The goal is to develop a new tool for firefighters that is dependable and which complements existing equipment and saves critical response time.

What testing, standards, or approvals do you need before this type of technology could be widely accepted by regulators, insurers, or fire services?

We are actively working with leading fire protection engineers to develop our validation case studies needed to inform our certification paths with UL, FM, NFPA.

Currently we are on an initial path to validate the technologies efficacy in exceeding the intent of NFPA 13D, residential interior water sprinklers.

The Sonic Backpack is currently undergoing real-world field testing with firefighters.

Feedback from these deployments informs ongoing research and development.

For regulators and fire services, acceptance ultimately comes down to performance data, reliability, and integration with existing wildfire mitigation frameworks, hence our initial pursuit of NFPA 13D equivalency.

Looking ahead, how do you see this approach fitting alongside existing wildfire measures such as building materials, defensible space, and conventional suppression systems?

Our approach is to complement the proven mitigations that are available in the market today and what comes tomorrow.

We do not intend for our tech to be the silver bullet.

The threat of conflagration events across the world are growing, and we are designing Sonic Fire Tech to be part of the solution to property and community resilience.

How, when, & where our technology best performs in the future of wildfires & urban conflagration events is frankly why we all wake up every morning and are working with purpose to push the tech forward.

This was originally published in the April 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

Upcoming webinar: From data to decision in the fight against wildfires

Electric utilities across North America are facing a growing crisis as wildfire seasons become longer, more destructive and increasingly unpredictable. In response, industry leaders are shifting their strategy from reacting to fires to preventing them.

A new webinar, From Data to Decision: Powering the Future of Wildfire Prevention for Utility Networks, will explore how this transformation is taking shape on April 28.

REGISTER HERE

The upcoming session, hosted by IFSJ sister publication FSJA, will bring together experts and utility professionals to examine how data is being harnessed to reduce wildfire risk and protect critical infrastructure.

At the heart of this shift is a move beyond simple data collection toward actionable intelligence, insights that can guide decisions across operations, risk management and long-term infrastructure planning.

Modern situational awareness platforms and predictive analytics are playing a central role. Utilities are now integrating a wide range of data sources, including localised climate patterns, real-time weather observations, vegetation health and encroachment monitoring, asset condition reports, historical outage trends and wildfire progression models.

These inputs are enabling a more comprehensive understanding of risk across utility networks.

Emerging technologies are also expanding the toolkit available to utilities. Artificial intelligence-powered smoke detection systems, for example, are helping identify potential ignitions earlier than ever before, giving operators valuable time to respond before incidents escalate.

The webinar will highlight how advances in vegetation intelligence, machine learning applied to localised climate extremes, and infrastructure risk scoring are allowing utilities to prioritise mitigation efforts more effectively.

By focusing resources where they are needed most, companies can strengthen resilience while improving public safety outcomes.

Wildfire experts to speak

Among the featured speakers is Chris Waters, a retired Operational Division Chief from CAL FIRE with 25 years of experience in wildfire management. Waters, now Principal of Fireshed Forestry Solutions, brings deep expertise in fire behavior modeling, predictive analytics, and risk assessment, informed by his work on major incidents including the 2021 Dixie Fire.

Joining him is Chuck Parker, Vice President of Sales – Americas at Indji Systems, Inc., and Director of Business Development for the utility industry. With more than two decades of experience, Parker has contributed extensively to industry knowledge through expert papers and conference presentations focused on lightning science, natural hazards, and data-driven solutions for utilities.

As wildfire risk continues to redefine operational priorities, the webinar aims to provide attendees with practical insights into how leading utilities are leveraging data to move from awareness to action. The session underscores a broader industry trend: prevention, powered by intelligence, is becoming the new frontline in wildfire management.

Sign up for the webinar here: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/666672836818352474

The future of wildfire technology

The world is making significant investments to rise to the challenge of managing and responding to deadly wildfires. Not only has the US federal government expanded budgets to prevent and defend against wildfires, but it is also evaluating the organisation of its federal wildfire agencies.

Likewise, state and local governments and utility companies are increasing their investments in wildfire prevention, mitigation and suppression.

IDGA’s Wildfire Technology Summit, taking place on April 21-22, 2026, at the Kona Kai Hotel in San Diego, CA, convenes senior decision-makers from across the wildfire ecosystem to tackle real-world challenges, accelerate modernisation efforts and shape the next phase of wildfire resilience, prevention, and suppression.

IDGA’s Wildfire Technology Summit agenda

Here’s a sneak peek at what you’ll find in the agenda:

✔️ Timely and high-priority sessions, such as the role of the brand-new U.S. Wildland Fire Service, advancing wildfire capabilities, AI and its role in wildfire intelligence, management strategies, and more!

✔️ Recently confirmed speakers, including Dirk Giles and Jessica Haas from the U.S. Forest Service, Sean Triplett and Mike Falkowski from Earth Fire Alliance and Brian D’Agostino from San Diego Gas and Electric, alongside many new additions

✔️ Networking opportunities with more than 300 senior wildfire experts, all focused on exploring solutions for the prediction, prevention, detection, suppression, and mitigation of destructive wildland fires

Download the agenda to find out more.

3M expands fire portfolio through $1.95 billion Madison Fire & Rescue deal

3M Fire deal sets out joint venture structure

3M has agreed to acquire Madison Fire & Rescue with Bain Capital through a new joint venture, with the transaction announced on 19 March and expected to close in the second half of 2026.

3M said it will contribute Scott Safety to the new company, receive $700M in cash proceeds on closing and hold a 50.1% stake, with Bain Capital holding 49.9%.

Under the terms of the agreement, 3M and Bain Capital will acquire Madison Fire & Rescue from Madison Industries for $1.95B.

The business includes rescue technology and fire suppression products sold under the Holmatro, Amkus, Task Force Tips, Fire Fighting Systems and Waterax brands.

Scott Safety and Madison Fire & Rescue products

According to 3M, the new company will combine Scott Safety’s premium Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) solutions with Madison Fire & Rescue’s wider product portfolio.

The company said the combined business is intended to serve firefighters, first responders and industrial workers.

William Brown, Chairman and CEO of 3M, said: “This strategic transaction broadens 3M’s safety portfolio, one of our priority verticals, by expanding our market reach and building scale for future growth.

“It positions us to enhance margins and generate strong free cash flow, and enables continued investment in innovations that create value for customers and shareholders.”

The transaction remains subject to customary closing conditions.

Donna Black named IAFC CEO, effective March 23, 2026

IAFC leadership change and start date

Donna Black has been appointed CEO of The International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC), effective March 23, 2026.

The IAFC announced the appointment in a statement.

Black has more than 29 years of fire service leadership experience, beginning in 1997 as a volunteer firefighter and progressing through volunteer and career ranks.

She has served as Fire Chief for the Town of Duck, North Carolina, since 2006.

Over the past year, she has also served as Acting U.S. Fire Administrator.

Experience, education and quotes

Black served as IAFC president and Board Chair in 2023 and was the second woman elected to that role in the association’s 153-year history.

Chief Trisha Wolford, President and Board Chair, said: “Donna Black’s leadership, dedication, and commitment to the membership make her exceptionally qualified to serve as IAFC’s CEO.

“Her appointment reflects both her achievements and IAFC’s ongoing commitment to lead, educate and serve.”

Black holds degrees from Ithaca College – B.S. – and the University of Georgia – M.A.

Her credentials include the National Fire Academy, Chief Fire Officer, and UNC Chapel Hill.

Black said: “I am honored to serve the IAFC.

“The organization supports fire and EMS leaders, and I look forward to working with members, partners, and staff to advance its mission.”

Black will take up the role on March 23, 2026.

The Last Word with Sarah Lawson: Advanced’s US growth plan

Sarah Lawson, Operations Director, Advanced, on driving compliance and innovation in the US fire safety market

North America faces stricter fire regulations and rising infrastructure investment.

How do these support your regional growth strategy?

We need to ensure the safest living and working environments, and this drives Advanced to design and manufacture compliant systems that are reliable and efficient.

In the US, that’s our Axis AX system which is UL approved, well established and supports low and medium rise buildings with its scalability.

This means designers and installers can opt for our small single panel up to our larger command centre.

What scale of opportunity do you believe exists for fire system manufacturers over the next few years?

The fire safety market is roughly $26 billion and that’s expected to grow to about $30 billion in 2030.

We believe that we’ve got a market opportunity of the $6 billion worth out there.

We’re really looking at operating costs, so we offer a system that’s easy to use, easy to programme and increases the installer’s efficiency.

The simplicity of our system is a real key differentiator and it can also scale.

How has the rigorous testing and certification standards shaped your product development and compliance strategy as you expand in North America?

UL’s high bar aligns with our global approach of designing for the world’s toughest standards.

Our R&D and product teams look to ensure that our systems meet and often exceed regulatory requirements.

We’re looking at what the regulator needs but also using customer feedback to try and drive a bit more of that market focus.

We’re utilising that with customer feedback and market insights, but we also have our distribution partner in the US, Harding.

As you exhibit at two US fire trade shows this year, what are you aiming to showcase about your technology and commitment to the US market?

We are returning to NFPA this year and we’re also exhibiting at ISC West.

What we’re looking to do is showcase our products, continue to increase our North American presence and to build the understanding of what Advanced can offer to the market.

We’d like to continue to demonstrate the reliability, usability and scalability of our Axis AX model and highlight our integration and smart building capabilities.

How is Advanced demonstrating its commitment to the US fire sector through investment, partnerships, and local support?

We have our distribution partner and we’re also investing in regional sales to support coverage in North America.

We are also continuing to understand the differences required in different areas and regulatory bodies.

We’re strengthening partnerships to improve local reach, while continuing to invest in training, customer support and after-sales support.

This ensures customers have a clear route to provide feedback, understand the breadth of our offering and get the most value from our products.

This was originally published in the February 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.

Oshkosh appoints Marty Bass to lead Pierce Manufacturing

Pierce Manufacturing leadership appointment

Pierce Manufacturing has appointed Marty Bass as President of Pierce Manufacturing, effective 13 January 2026.

Bass’s responsibilities include oversight of Pierce Manufacturing, MAXIMETAL, Oshkosh Airport Products (ARFF) and Frontline Communications.

He joins Pierce following a 19-year career at Brunswick Corporation.

His most recent role there was President, Americas Market Operations for the Navico Group.

Role scope and background

Bass has more than two decades of leadership experience in global manufacturing businesses, with a background in operations, quality systems and complex supply chains.

During his tenure at Brunswick, he held roles including President of Mercury Marine’s Europe, Middle East and Africa region.

He also served as Vice President of Global Category Management and Strategy at Mercury Marine.

Mike Pack, Oshkosh Corporation Executive Vice President and President, Vocational, said: “Marty is a proven leader with a deep understanding of how to deliver quality, efficiency and long-term growth to meet the critical needs of our customers.

“As Pierce continues to make significant investments in people and across operations, Marty’s experience leading advanced manufacturing organizations will be instrumental in helping us remain focused on what matters most: delivering safe, reliable, quality fire apparatus while being thoughtful stewards of our customers’ resources.”

Current operating context and investment claims

The company said Bass joins as departments across North America face increased budget pressures, industry-wide extended lead times and rising operational demands.

Pierce described its response as more than $150 million in capital investment and capacity expansions, process improvements and workforce development aimed at strengthening quality and improving production flow to reduce delivery timelines.

Bass said: “I’m honored to join Pierce Manufacturing and build upon the legacy of craftsmanship, innovation and customer commitment which defines this organization.

“Fire departments and their communities rely on Pierce apparatus to perform in the most critical moments, and that responsibility guides every decision we make.

“My focus will be on supporting our teams, reinforcing quality and operational discipline, and ensuring we continue to earn the trust of our customers and the fire service community.”

Before his corporate career, Bass served as an officer and engineer in the United States Navy within the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.

He holds dual master’s degrees in business administration and engineering management from Northwestern University.

He also holds a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School and a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

The future of fire service data: How FSRI rebuilt US incident reporting with NERIS

Dr Craig Weinschenk, Lead Engineer for NERIS at the Fire Safety Research Institute, discusses rebuilding the foundation of US emergency data management from the ground up

For nearly half a century, US fire departments have relied on the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) to record and share incident data.

But a framework designed for paper forms in the 1970s has struggled to keep pace with the demands of a connected, data-driven era.

Its manual processes, static structure and years-long data lag limited the fire service’s ability to analyse trends or act on emerging risks in real time.

The new National Emergency Response Information System (NERIS) aims to change that.

Developed by the Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI) in partnership with the US Fire Administration and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Science and Technology, NERIS provides a cloud-based, geospatial and user-focused platform that captures and shares fire data almost instantly.

IFSJ Editor Iain Hoey sat down with Dr Craig Weinschenk, Lead Engineer on NERIS at FSRI, to learn how the system was built and what it could mean for the future of fire service data.

NFIRS served the fire service for nearly 50 years – what were its limitations, and why was a new approach required?

NFIRS was conceived in 1973 after the Fire Control Act and it started as paper forms, even carbon copy forms where you had three copies.

To make field reporting doable, “structure fire” became “111” because three numbers are easier to process than handwriting.

That served the field well for a long time, but you needed a big lookup table to know the codes.

When things started to digitise in the late 80s, early 90s into the 2000s, the approach was to digitise NFIRS.

It became a digital version of paper forms instead of taking advantage of advances in database technology.

Expectations for data expanded, but the system stayed tied to that older mindset.

It was not geospatial.

You filled out a complete address but there was no latitude and longitude in the payload, even though incidents all occur somewhere.

It was also very manual.

You completed the record locally, exported a text file, sent it to the state, then to the federal government.

Everyone processed plain text files that were emailed around.

That does not scale and it creates data lag.

When your environment changes in three-to-nine-month windows but the data lags 18 to 24 months, you miss chances to make real time impact because by the time it is aggregated you are looking too far in the past.

There were practical constraints too.

The hardware was old and the software was old, and you could not upgrade one without breaking the other.

If you tried to build an NFIRS 6.0 you were rebuilding the same system and moving one step forward.

The decision was to rebuild from the ground up, take lessons learned from geospatial needs and time lag, and put the fire service first on incident collection.

That is what we did with NERIS.

How did this public-private partnership work in practice, and why was it important?

We work hand in hand with the United States Fire Administration and with DHS S&T.

We have weekly stand-ups and the rigor you expect from a national project.

We produce documentation and artifacts, and we have oversight from security scans to operational performance metrics, all documented and shared with the federal government.

That oversight ensures we have no blind spots and keeps the project healthy.

As a nonprofit building this, we can also be nimble.

We are not owning local data or hosting on federal servers inside federal firewalls, which have limitations.

We can hire a dynamic team and move quickly while following standards and best practices.

We see ourselves as stewards of a national system by and for the local fire service, building to support USFA’s mission and DHS’s mission while putting the fire service first.

Data governance is foundational.

Local departments own their data.

They collect it and send it.

The value is in aggregating at local data  regionally statewide, and nationally, but the department still owns the record.

That principle is a critical piece that makes this work.

What is causation data and why does it matter for incident reporting and prevention?

In NFIRS the causation data was in the primary record.

That created a challenge.

Either the record stayed open while you waited for an independent investigator to provide answers, or people put something in just to close the record.

We decoupled the schemas.

We have a core schema that looks at general causality from a fire behaviour and safety perspective, not from criminality.

We are deliberate in our language so we can understand the incident from safety, response and frequency perspectives.

Then we have a follow-on called Incident Analysis.

The two are decoupled.

You can close the first part so we know the call happened and we can run metrics on demand, while the analysis can be completed 24 or 48 hours later when the right staff are available or when more time is needed to understand the incident.

That puts the right information in front of the right people at the right time, instead of forcing someone who may not be qualified to answer those questions.

How does the system balance the need for national-level analysis with the practical, day-to-day needs of local departments?

In addition to collection, we are building an analytics platform that runs as part of the system.

Every department gets an Insights tab with high level information about response.

Incidents appear on maps, colour coded by response duration so you can spot hotspots.

We are deploying a unit-level response dashboard to see metrics on particular units, frequency of units running together and distances travelled.

We also show things around casualties and rescues, so you can understand both loss and saves.

Data ladders up.

A state sees the same dashboards in aggregate.

They can view activity percentages, performance across the state and distributions of calls by discipline.

Because we built an API-based system instead of manual data movement, when a record shows up it is available to the local and to the state, and it is available to be pulled by the federal government into its infrastructure via secure API.

They keep a full copy and can run their analytics in real time.

We have cut lag from roughly 14 or 15 days from local to state, and 6, 12 or 18 months to federal, down to hours.

In practice we usually see records completed at the end of a shift, QA and QC over the next shift, then submission.

If you want to keep using your own tools, you can do that and still access your data via secure API.

Looking ahead, what do you see as the next steps for NERIS?

NFIRS sunsets on 31 December 2025.

Looking at 2026 there are two phases: take what we learned on onboarding and improve the system, schemas, questions and workflows.

Then focus on analytics.

Provide products that help departments do their job, identify gaps in response at hyper-local levels, and surface larger trends regionally, at state level and nationally.

The aim is to identify the next hazard and where to invest in research, because we are seeing data fast enough to act.

This was originally published in the January 2026 Edition of International Fire & Safety Journal. To read your FREE copy, click here.