Mumbai high-rise fire reveals non-operational safety systems

Inspection reveals high-rise safety system failures

An inspection by the Mumbai Fire Brigade revealed critical safety deficiencies in a 22-storey high-rise in Dongri, Mumbai, a day after a fire broke out in the building.

Officials found the firefighting system was non-operational, and the building lacked a designated refuge area.

A senior fire brigade officer stated that the building’s management has been asked to provide structural plans, including those for firefighting systems and refuge areas, as mandated by Section 6 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006.

The officer said: “A notice will be served to the building on Nov 28, if they are unable to produce the plans.”

Official response to the fire

Mumbai Fire Brigade officials confirmed that immediate measures are being taken to address the issue.

An official said: “Our teams reached the site and found that the fire systems were non-operational.

“We will issue a notice to the building, but have given them time to produce any documentation.”

Amin Patel, Congress MLA for the constituency, called for strict action against those responsible for the lapses.

He said: “The lives of people should be of utmost priority, and any kind of negligence should be dealt with strictly.

“I have already spoken to the authorities to ensure that such an incident isn’t repeated.”

Allegations of illegal construction

Shiv Sena Mahayuti candidate Shaina NC visited the site and raised allegations of illegal construction and safety negligence.

She said: “There is no parking or refuge area in the building.

“We insist on the registration of an offence by the jurisdiction police, Dongri Police, and DCP Zone 1 to take action against the builder and the nexus of illegalities and mafia involved.”

Shaina NC also highlighted the need for a detailed investigation into the lack of firefighting facilities, stating: “Because of such illegal construction, the lives of the poor people are at stake.”

Legislative safety requirements

Under the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, building owners and occupants are required to ensure fire safety measures are in place and operational.

Failure to comply with these regulations can result in notices, fines, and legal action.

The Dongri high-rise fire incident has drawn attention to the importance of adhering to these safety measures and the consequences of negligence.

Mumbai high-rise fire reveals non-operational safety systems: Summary

An inspection by the Mumbai Fire Brigade after a blaze at a 22-storey Dongri high-rise found that its firefighting system was non-operational, and the building lacked a refuge area.

Officials are demanding structural plans to ensure compliance with the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006.

Notices are set to be issued if documentation is not provided.

Local leaders, including Congress MLA Amin Patel and Shiv Sena Mahayuti candidate Shaina NC, have called for strict action against the builder and alleged illegalities contributing to the building’s deficiencies.

Tougher targets set for removing unsafe cladding in England, industry responds

Government introduces the remediation acceleration plan

The UK government has announced its Remediation Acceleration Plan to tackle unsafe cladding in England.

The plan, published today, outlines measures to expedite the remediation process, hold accountable rogue freeholders, and support affected residents.

According to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, key targets include the remediation of all high-rise (18m+) buildings with unsafe cladding by the end of 2029 through government-funded schemes.

By the same date, all buildings over 11 metres with unsafe cladding will either be remediated, have a set completion date, or see their landlords face penalties for inaction.

Building Safety Minister Alex Norris said: “Every resident deserves to feel safe in their home.

“By setting a clear timeline and firm deadlines, today’s announcement is a major step towards ensuring every building is made safe.”

Developer commitments and enforcement measures

The plan is supported by a joint action plan with developers, aiming to double the rate of remediation work on buildings they are responsible for.

At least 29 developers, representing over 95% of the self-remediation workload, have committed to starting work on all their affected buildings by summer 2027.

The plan also includes increased investment in enforcement to enable local authorities, fire and rescue services, and the Building Safety Regulator to address hundreds of cases annually.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said: “The pace of remediation has been far too slow for far too long.

“We are taking decisive action to right this wrong and make homes safe.”

Progress since Grenfell and challenges ahead

The plan comes seven years after the Grenfell Tower fire, where 72 lives were lost.

While 95% of buildings with cladding similar to that used on Grenfell have been remediated, only 30% of all identified unsafe buildings in England have been addressed.

Thousands more buildings are expected to be added to the remediation list through a comprehensive register to identify unsafe cladding using advanced data assessments.

The plan builds on findings from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, which highlighted systemic failures in ensuring safety.

The government will provide updates on progress by March 2025, with a long-term social housing remediation strategy to follow in spring 2025.

Regulatory changes for building safety

The announcement coincides with a parliamentary debate on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s final report, which includes proposals for improving statutory guidance on building regulations.

The Building Safety Regulator will oversee a continuous review process to ensure clarity and accountability in fire safety and building design standards.

Social housing remediation will also be accelerated, with targeted support for eligible social landlords to begin work sooner.

The government aims to review 80% of the 11m+ building stock by 2025, reaching 95% by late 2025, and holding those responsible for unsafe cladding accountable.

National Fire Chiefs Council highlights workforce challenges

The National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) has welcomed the UK government’s Remediation Acceleration Plan but cautioned that achieving the outlined targets will face significant challenges.

Responding to the announcement, NFCC Chair Mark Hardingham said: “We welcome the Government’s plans to improve building safety and accelerate the removal of unsafe cladding.

“Addressing these risks is a critical step towards preventing future tragedies and ensuring the safety of people in their homes across the country.”

Hardingham emphasised the practical difficulties in delivering such a large-scale programme.

He noted a shortage of skilled professionals required to meet the ambitious targets and warned that current pressures on fire and rescue services may hinder progress.

He stated: “Without a coordinated, long-term strategy to address workforce shortages and build capacity, there is a real risk of overstretching the capacity of competent practitioners across the fire and wider construction sectors.”

The NFCC has called for sustainable funding and collaboration with all stakeholders, including local authorities, industry leaders, and training providers, to ensure a systemic response.

Fire Brigades Union calls for urgent action

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has criticised the delays in addressing unsafe cladding, describing the prolonged crisis as unacceptable.

FBU General Secretary Matt Wrack said: “It is now more than seven years since the Grenfell Tower fire, an entirely preventable disaster which took the lives of 72 people.

“Residents and firefighters had been warning of the dangers of flammable cladding for years before it took place.”

Wrack called for accelerated action on cladding, increased investment in local government, and stronger support for the fire and rescue services.

He also urged an end to the privatisation of building control, which he described as a contributing factor to the crisis.

He added: “It is an utter disgrace that many millions of people are on course to be left living in unsafe buildings for at least 12 years after the Grenfell Tower fire.

“We urge the government to speed this process up.”

Stakeholders seek long-term strategies for building safety

Both organisations have stressed the importance of addressing systemic issues that underpin the cladding crisis.

The NFCC highlighted the need for sustainable funding to support fire and rescue services, ensuring they can fulfil statutory obligations while contributing to the remediation programme.

The FBU echoed this sentiment, calling for immediate investment in local government and public services to address the crisis effectively.

Both groups have expressed their willingness to collaborate with the government and industry to ensure the safety of affected residents and prevent future tragedies.

Tougher targets set for removing unsafe cladding in England, industry responds: Summary

The UK government has launched the Remediation Acceleration Plan to address unsafe cladding in England.

The plan sets deadlines for remediating high-rise and mid-rise buildings by 2029 and introduces penalties for non-compliance.

At least 29 developers will increase their remediation efforts, with enforcement powers given to local authorities and the Building Safety Regulator.

The plan builds on Grenfell Tower Inquiry findings, aiming to identify all unsafe buildings through a comprehensive register and advanced data tools.

Social housing remediation will also be prioritised, with a strategy due in 2025.

The NFCC and FBU have responded to the UK government’s announcement of its Remediation Acceleration Plan to remove unsafe cladding.

The NFCC welcomed the initiative but highlighted workforce shortages and capacity challenges as obstacles to achieving the proposed targets.

The FBU criticised the delays, describing the situation as unacceptable and calling for immediate action on cladding, investment in public services, and an end to the privatisation of building control.

Both organisations stressed the need for a coordinated, long-term strategy involving collaboration across all sectors to address the crisis effectively and prevent future tragedies.

Fire Risk Assessment – A Guide for Workplaces

A Fire risk assessment is crucial in ensuring the safety of a workplace. 

They help identify potential fire hazards and create a plan to reduce risks. 

Having an effective fire risk assessment can prevent serious incidents and save lives.

In this article, we will explore what a fire risk assessment is, why it’s necessary, who needs it, how to conduct one, and how often it should be done.

What is a Fire Risk Assessment?

what is fire risk assessment

A fire risk assessment is a process that identifies potential fire hazards in a workplace and evaluates the risk they pose. 

The goal is to prevent fires from starting and to ensure that people can safely evacuate if one occurs. 

The assessment involves looking for sources of ignition, flammable materials, and any risks that could make a fire worse.

It also includes checking if there are enough fire safety measures in place, such as fire alarms, extinguishers, and emergency exits. 

The findings help create an action plan to reduce risks, ensuring the workplace complies with fire safety regulations.

A fire risk assessment isn’t just a one-time task. 

It needs to be reviewed regularly, especially if there are changes in the workplace, like new equipment or staff. 

By conducting regular fire risk assessments, workplaces can minimise the chance of fires, protect lives, and avoid costly damages. 

They’re a legal requirement for most businesses, but more importantly, they ensure a safe environment for everyone in the building.

Why is a Fire Risk Assessment Needed?

why fire risk assessment needed

A fire risk assessment is essential for several reasons. 

Legal Requirements

It ensures that workplaces comply with legal requirements. 

Many countries have laws that mandate regular fire risk assessments for businesses.

Accident Prevention

Fire risk assessments help prevent accidents and injuries. 

Fires can spread quickly, and without proper precautions, they can cause serious damage or even fatalities. 

Identifying fire hazards early allows businesses to put in place measures to prevent fires.

Property Protection

A fire risk assessment helps protect property. 

Fires can cause significant financial losses by damaging buildings, equipment, and inventory. 

By reducing fire risks, businesses can protect their investments and ensure continuity.

Safe Working Environment

Finally, fire risk assessments promote a safe working environment. 

Employees will feel safer knowing that their workplace has taken steps to protect them from potential fire risks. 

This can boost morale and increase productivity.

Who Needs a Fire Risk Assessment?

who needs fire risk assessment

A fire risk assessment is essential for almost all businesses and organisations. 

It is a legal requirement in most countries for any workplace that has more than five employees. 

Whether it’s a small office, a large factory, or a retail store, fire risks exist, and conducting regular fire risk assessments helps minimise them.

Businesses and Offices

Any business, regardless of size or industry, needs a fire risk assessment. 

This includes offices, retail stores, restaurants, and warehouses. 

Even low-risk environments, like small offices, should assess potential fire hazards, such as electrical equipment or paper storage.

Industrial Facilities

Factories and warehouses deal with larger risks, especially when handling hazardous materials, machinery, or chemicals. 

Regular assessments help manage these risks and ensure that proper safety measures, like fire suppression systems and clear evacuation routes, are in place.

Public Buildings

Public spaces, such as schools, healthcare buildings such as hospitals, and care homes, need fire risk assessments to protect large groups of people. 

These places often have vulnerable individuals, such as children, the elderly, or people with disabilities, who require extra safety considerations during evacuation.

Landlords and Property Owners

Landlords and property managers are responsible for ensuring that their properties, particularly multi-occupancy buildings like apartment complexes, are fire-safe. 

Regular fire risk assessments ensure that residents have adequate fire alarms, clear escape routes, and functioning fire doors.

What to do For a Fire Risk Assessment

fire risk assessment what to do

Conducting a fire risk assessment is essential for maintaining workplace safety. 

It involves identifying potential fire hazards, assessing risks, and implementing measures to reduce those risks. 

Below is a step-by-step guide on what to do for a fire risk assessment.

Identify Fire Hazards

The first step in a fire risk assessment is identifying potential fire hazards in the workplace. 

Hazards can include sources of ignition, such as electrical equipment, heaters, or machinery, and combustible materials like paper, fabric, or chemicals. 

Look for areas where heat or sparks could come into contact with flammable items. 

This can be anything from overloaded power outlets to improper chemical storage.

Identify People at Risk

Next, identify who might be at risk in the event of a fire. 

This includes not only employees but also visitors, contractors, or members of the public. 

Consider specific groups that may be more vulnerable, such as the elderly, disabled, or those with mobility issues. 

Make sure that emergency exits and lighting, and evacuation procedures are suitable for everyone, including those who may need assistance during an evacuation.

Evaluate the Risks and Take Action

Once you’ve identified hazards and people at risk, evaluate the level of risk associated with each hazard. 

Ask yourself: How likely is it that a fire could start, and how severe would the consequences be? 

After evaluating the risks, take appropriate actions to eliminate or reduce them. 

This could involve:

  • Removing or reducing fire hazards (e.g., properly storing flammable materials).
  • Installing or improving fire detection systems, such as smoke alarms.
  • Ensuring that fire extinguishers are accessible and maintained.
  • Implementing clear fire safety protocols and ensuring exits are unobstructed.

Record Your Findings and Implement Changes

In businesses with more than five employees, it is a legal requirement to document your findings. 

This documentation should include the hazards identified, the people at risk, and the actions taken to reduce or eliminate risks. 

Keep a detailed log of all fire safety measures in place, such as fire extinguishers, fire exits, and alarms.

Once you have recorded the findings, make sure the necessary changes are implemented. 

Assign responsibilities to individuals, such as fire wardens or fire marshals, who can oversee the implementation of safety measures.

Review and Update Regularly

Fire risk assessments are not a one-time task and should be reviewed regularly.

By keeping your assessment up to date, you ensure that new risks are addressed, and fire safety measures remain effective.

Who Can Do a Fire Risk Assessment?

who can do fire risk assessment

A fire risk assessment can be conducted by a competent person within the workplace. 

This person must have adequate knowledge of fire safety regulations and an understanding of fire hazards. 

Often, businesses will appoint a fire warden or safety officer to conduct these assessments.

For complex buildings or high-risk environments, it may be necessary to hire a professional fire risk assessor. 

A professional will have the expertise and experience to identify risks that might be overlooked by someone with less training.

Some businesses choose to outsource their fire risk assessment entirely to certified professionals. 

This ensures that the assessment is thorough and compliant with legal standards. 

However, even if you hire a professional, the employer is still responsible for ensuring the assessment is carried out properly.

How Often Should a Fire Risk Assessment be Done?

how often fire risk assessment

A fire risk assessment should be conducted regularly to ensure the safety of a workplace and its occupants. 

The frequency of these assessments depends on various factors, such as the type of business, the size of the premises, and the level of fire risk involved.

Annual Reviews

As a general rule, businesses should review their fire risk assessments at least once a year. 

This ensures that any changes in the workplace, such as new equipment or changes in staff, are considered and any new risks are identified and addressed.

After Significant Changes

If there are significant changes in the workplace, such as renovations, new machinery, or changes in the number of employees, a new fire risk assessment should be done immediately. 

These changes can introduce new fire hazards or affect existing safety measures, such as fire exits or alarm systems.

High-Risk Environments

Workplaces with higher fire risks, such as factories, chemical plants, or places that handle flammable materials, may need more frequent fire risk assessments. 

Depending on the level of risk, reviews might be necessary every six months or even quarterly.

After a Fire Incident

If a fire has occurred, an immediate review and reassessment should be conducted. 

This helps identify what went wrong and ensures that additional safety measures are put in place to prevent future incidents.

Conclusion

You should now have the knowledge on exactly what a fire risk assessment is. 

A Fire risk assessment is vital for ensuring workplace safety and preventing devastating incidents. 

They help identify potential hazards, protect employees, and ensure compliance with fire safety regulations. 

Conducting regular fire risk assessments, documenting findings, and acting on identified risks will create a safer environment for everyone. 

Remember, whether your workplace is an office, a factory, or a care home, fire safety is a responsibility that should never be overlooked. 

By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can ensure that your fire risk assessment is thorough, effective, and up to date.

Independent façade design service launched by CHPK Group

CHPK Group launches façade design service in response to industry demand

CHPK Group, a property and construction consultancy, has announced the introduction of a new Façade Design service.

The service is aimed at providing independent, comprehensive façade design solutions for building owners, architects, and contractors.

According to CHPK Group, this initiative addresses the growing need for fire safety compliance and structural integrity in façade design, incorporating expertise from their team of chartered fire engineers and structural façade specialists.

The service, led by Chouaib Lekmiti, director of external wall and façade, is designed to support both remediation projects and new builds.

It integrates fire safety and risk mitigation strategies at every stage, ensuring compliance with local and international safety regulations.

CHPK Group highlights that this approach combines safety, aesthetics, and structural integrity in its designs.

Comprehensive solutions for building lifecycles

CHPK Group’s Façade Design service aims to provide a holistic, full-service approach, covering all aspects of a building’s lifecycle.

The service streamlines project processes by offering clients a single point of contact from inception to completion.

It employs the latest technologies to enhance efficiency and ensure consistent project management.

Current projects include collaborations with Telford Homes and other clients, focusing on façade remediation work.

These projects involve replacing non-compliant insulation and materials with approved alternatives while maintaining the original design intent of the buildings.

Expert team with interdisciplinary experience

The Façade Design service team brings a range of expertise, including chartered fire engineers, façade designers, and structural façade engineers with architectural training.

This multidisciplinary approach enables the service to address complex requirements in modern construction projects.

Chouaib Lekmiti explained: “This service is a direct response to the urgent need for independent, accredited fire engineering advice to deliver fire safety compliance in façade design.

“Alongside the obvious safety and structural demands, we also know that façades play an important role in placemaking and must support quality architecture, design, and sustainability.”

Supporting architectural and sustainability goals

CHPK Group emphasises the importance of façades in creating sustainable and high-quality designs.

The Façade Design service aligns with broader architectural goals, ensuring that buildings are safe while enhancing their aesthetic and functional value.

By collaborating with architects, developers, and building owners, CHPK aims to integrate their façade design service with other CHPK Group offerings to provide comprehensive project solutions.

The consultancy also stresses its commitment to fostering client collaboration for optimal project outcomes.

CHPK Group introduces independent façade design service led by chartered fire engineers: Summary

CHPK Group has launched a Façade Design service to meet the demand for independent and accredited fire engineering solutions.

The service focuses on remediation and new build projects, incorporating fire safety strategies to ensure compliance with safety standards.

Led by Chouaib Lekmiti and a team of chartered fire engineers and façade specialists, the service integrates safety, aesthetics, and structural integrity into façade design.

Current projects include work with Telford Homes, replacing non-compliant materials while retaining original design aesthetics.

The initiative supports sustainable, high-quality architectural goals, with CHPK offering a single point of contact for streamlined project delivery.

UK fire safety standard BS 9991:2024 revised for residential building guidance

Updated fire safety guidance for UK residential buildings

The British Standards Institution (BSI) has released the revised BS 9991:2024 Fire safety in the design, management and use of residential buildings – Code of practice.

Published on 27 November 2024, the updated standard replaces the previous 2015 edition.

BS 9991:2024 includes new recommendations and updates aimed at enhancing fire safety in residential properties across the UK.

Focus on Grenfell and stakeholder input

The revisions commenced prior to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry final report in September 2024.

While the report did not directly recommend changes to BS 9991, it highlighted the need for comprehensive fire safety measures.

The public consultation process generated over 1,800 comments, reviewed by the FSH/14 technical committee responsible for the standard.

Expanded scope and updated measures

Key updates in BS 9991:2024 include extending the scope to cover residential care homes, revised guidance on evacuation lifts, and new height limits for sprinkler installations and single-stair buildings.

These changes aim to provide consistent fire safety measures while addressing diverse UK regulations, including England’s Approved Document B, Scotland’s Technical Handbook 2, and Northern Ireland’s Technical Booklet E.

Expert input and industry focus

BSI Director-General, Standards, Scott Steedman, commented:

“The Grenfell tragedy has brought the issue of building safety into focus.

“It is critical that all standards reflect the latest evidence.”

He noted that the updated standard is designed to ensure effective escape routes and robust fire safety systems in residential buildings.

BS 9991:2024 revised for fire safety: summary

The BSI has published the updated BS 9991:2024 standard for residential building fire safety.

The revised guidance includes expanded scope and updated safety measures.

It reflects input from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and extensive consultation with stakeholders.

Managing fire risks with living walls: Insurer’s advice for safe construction

Demand for sustainable vertical gardens raises fire safety concerns

An insurance expert has urged construction companies to assess the risks associated with living walls as their popularity in sustainable architecture increases.

Lee Musgrove, from insurance broker Lycetts, highlighted the potential fire risks linked to materials used in these systems.

Musgrove stated: “With the increasing integration of green roofs and living walls in modern architectural designs, there is a pressing need to address the fire risks linked to the materials used in these on-trend systems.”

He pointed out that even with proper installation of cavity barriers, some components might still be combustible, posing risks of fire spread.

Non-combustible materials essential for mitigating fire risks

To enhance safety, Musgrove recommended the use of non-combustible materials for backing walls, insulation, and support structures.

He emphasised that careful consideration must be given to elements such as potting, irrigation, and drainage systems.

“The impact of severe weather events and potential water leaks can significantly affect the safety and insurability of the building,” he explained.

This could also endanger adjacent structures if the design and maintenance of the living wall are inadequate.

He also advised structural engineers to assess load-bearing capacities during the design phase to ensure that the building can support these installations.

Unique challenges posed by green roofs

Musgrove outlined specific risks related to green roofs, which differ from conventional roofs due to their added weight and water retention capacity.

“Green roofs are considerably heavier due to the additional weight of the support structure, the requisite irrigation systems as well as the plants themselves,” Musgrove said.

Heavy rainfall further increases water retention, creating structural challenges.

To address these risks, he suggested conducting water tests after installation to detect leaks and installing electronic leak detectors for ongoing monitoring.

Consultation with insurers recommended for construction projects

Musgrove recommended early consultation with insurers to mitigate risks.

He stressed the importance of maintaining living walls through annual inspections to remove problematic plants and ensure safety.

“Living walls and green roofs offer numerous environmental, aesthetic, and health benefits but the ongoing maintenance and repair can be a challenging and costly process,” Musgrove said.

He urged companies to prioritise safety alongside sustainability goals.

Managing fire risks with living walls: Summary

An insurance expert has called for construction firms to evaluate the risks posed by living walls and green roofs, focusing on fire safety and structural challenges.

Recommendations include using non-combustible materials, conducting rigorous testing, and consulting insurers early in the design process.

Living walls require regular maintenance to ensure safety and insurability, particularly given their dependency on irrigation systems and potential for weather-related impacts.

The advice underscores the balance between achieving sustainability and maintaining building safety.

CROSS-AUS addresses structural safety with latest newsletter

Structural Safety: Engineering New Zealand strengthens registration rules for engineers

Engineering New Zealand (ENZ) has released a consultation document proposing updates to the Chartered Professional Engineer Rules.

These updates aim to enhance the quality and accountability of engineers by introducing new registration classes, revising the assessment process, and bolstering the complaints and disciplinary system.

According to CROSS-AUS, these changes reflect an ongoing commitment to improving engineering and structural safety standards in Australasia.

Additionally, the Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand (SESOC) has issued an interim advisory document addressing the implications of the National Seismic Hazard Model.

SESOC is also working on further guidance related to low-damage design principles, contributing to seismic safety in the region.

CROSS-AUS highlights the role of human factors in engineering safety

CROSS-AUS Director Gordon Hughes emphasised the importance of learning from human errors in engineering.

He noted that while engineers focus heavily on technical training and Continuing Professional Development, the role of human factors is often overlooked.

Hughes said: “As engineers, we can build on this by sharing experiences so that we can learn from other people’s mistakes, and they can learn from ours.”

He further encouraged the use of CROSS Safety Reports as a tool to confidentially share and learn from engineering errors, promoting improved structural safety.

Importance of robust load paths in structural design

The CROSS-AUS newsletter includes insights on the significance of robust load paths in engineering.

Two safety reports featured in the issue explore issues related to portal frames, underscoring the necessity of thorough inspection and maintenance.

A webinar presented by ENZ, Load Path Analysis for General Practice Engineers, led by UK-based engineer Mark Moppett, reiterated the critical criteria for selecting a load path: strength, stiffness, and stability.

Moppett also discussed the safe theorem of lower bound plasticity, which ensures structural safety when equilibrium is maintained, and stresses remain within yield limits.

Moppett explained: “The structure will only collapse when it has exhausted all possible paths, giving engineers the liberty to choose and direct load paths.”

Safety Reports provide critical insights for engineers

The newsletter highlights the value of CROSS Safety Reports in addressing common engineering challenges.

These reports offer practical examples of safety risks and solutions, enabling engineers to apply these lessons to their projects.

CROSS-AUS aims to encourage proactive measures in structural safety by fostering an environment where engineers can share their experiences without fear of professional repercussions.

CROSS-AUS newsletter discusses structural safety in Australasia: Summary

The 12th CROSS-AUS newsletter, published on 28 November 2024, provides updates on engineering safety initiatives in Australasia.

Engineering New Zealand has proposed updates to registration rules, including new classes and improved accountability measures.

SESOC released guidance on seismic safety, focusing on the National Seismic Hazard Model and low-damage design.

CROSS-AUS Director Gordon Hughes highlighted the importance of addressing human factors in engineering and encouraged using CROSS Safety Reports for knowledge sharing.

The newsletter also emphasised the role of robust load paths in structural design, featuring insights from ENZ’s webinar by Mark Moppett.

Engineers are encouraged to apply lessons from these safety reports to enhance structural integrity and safety practices.

Grenfell Tower Inquiry: House of Lords discusses government response and remediation efforts

Government responds to Grenfell Tower Inquiry findings

As reported by the House of Lords, members engaged in an extensive debate on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report.

The discussion centred on the report’s findings, which highlighted systemic failures that led to the tragic fire in West London, resulting in 72 fatalities, including 18 children.

Lord Khan of Burnley moved to take note of the report, emphasising the preventable nature of the tragedy and the collective shortcomings of the state and construction industry.

Lord Khan stated: “It was an immensely personal tragedy for the bereaved families, survivors and residents in the immediate community.” He acknowledged the government’s commitment to ensuring such an event does not recur and thanked Sir Martin Moore-Bick for his thorough examination of the incident.

Baroness Sanderson of Welton emphasised the importance of addressing the report’s recommendations promptly.

She highlighted the need for a national oversight mechanism to monitor the implementation of public inquiry findings.

Lord Khan assured the House that the government is dedicated to responding to the inquiry within six months and increasing remediation efforts to prevent future tragedies.

Remediation efforts and regulatory reforms highlighted

Baroness Pidgeon raised concerns about the slow progress in remediating unsafe buildings, citing recent National Audit Office reports that indicate only a fraction of high-rise buildings have been addressed.

She called for streamlined processes to expedite remediation and protect leaseholders from bearing the costs of fixing fire risks.

The government has allocated over £1 billion for remediation in the fiscal year 2025-26 and committed to accelerating the pace through targeted measures.

Lord Stevenson of Balmacara discussed the necessity of regulatory reforms in the construction sector.

He stressed the importance of clear guidance and mandatory qualifications for fire risk assessors to ensure public safety.

The government plans to introduce comprehensive reforms to the construction products regime to enhance consumer confidence and supply chain integrity.

Baroness Scott of Bybrook focused on the impact of the tragedy on vulnerable populations, including children and individuals with disabilities.

She urged the government to ensure continued support for the Grenfell community, including tailored health services and educational support for affected children.

The government intends to implement personal emergency evacuation plans (PEEPs) and enhance fire safety measures for vulnerable residents by 2025-26.

Support for Grenfell community and social housing reforms

Baroness Thornhill highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by the Grenfell community, including mental health issues and the need for sustained support.

She emphasised the importance of providing adequate funding for remediation works and ensuring that social housing providers are held accountable for maintaining safe living environments.

The government has committed to increasing investment in social housing and implementing reforms to improve accountability and service quality.

Lord Carter of Haslemere raised concerns about the lack of legal accountability for those responsible for the Grenfell tragedy.

He called for the prosecution of culpable individuals and companies to ensure justice for the victims.

The government responded by stating that criminal investigations are ongoing and that they are committed to holding responsible parties accountable through the legal system.

Baroness Pinnock underscored the role of manufacturers and certification bodies in the Grenfell disaster.

She questioned whether the government is considering the status of these critical companies and whether there will be stricter oversight to prevent similar incidents.

The government assured that comprehensive proposals for system-wide reform of the construction products regime are forthcoming to enhance safety and accountability.

Accountability and justice for responsible parties

Baroness Brinton emphasised the need for accountability within government departments and public bodies to prevent future tragedies.

She pointed out the absence of mechanisms to ensure the implementation of public inquiry recommendations and advocated for greater transparency and monitoring.

The government acknowledged this concern and committed to establishing robust oversight systems to track the implementation of recommendations.

Lord Booth-Smith reflected on the personal impact of the Grenfell tragedy and the importance of remembering the victims.

He highlighted the emotional and financial toll on the community and called for swift action to remediate unsafe buildings.

The government reiterated its commitment to increasing remediation funding and streamlining processes to ensure timely completion of safety measures.

The Earl of Lytton discussed the technical aspects of building safety and the importance of robust construction standards.

He criticised the “stay put” evacuation strategy in buildings with inadequate fire resistance and called for stricter enforcement of building regulations.

The government responded by stating that buildings requiring remediation will adopt simultaneous evacuation strategies to ensure resident safety.

Lord Porter of Spalding expressed frustration over the length and detail of the inquiry report but emphasised the necessity of thorough investigations to prevent future incidents.

He called for the implementation of recommendations related to building safety and the protection of leaseholders from undue financial burdens.

The government assured that measures are being taken to address these issues and that progress updates will be provided.

Summary: Grenfell Tower Inquiry report reviewed by House of Lords

The House of Lords conducted a comprehensive debate on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report, addressing the systemic failures that led to the tragic fire in West London.

Government officials, including Lord Khan of Burnley, committed to responding to the inquiry within six months and accelerating remediation efforts with over £1 billion allocated for 2025-26.

Discussions highlighted the need for regulatory reforms in the construction industry, streamlined remediation processes, and enhanced support for affected communities.

Key recommendations include establishing a national oversight mechanism, enforcing accountability for responsible companies, and implementing personal emergency evacuation plans for vulnerable residents.

The government emphasised its dedication to preventing future tragedies and supporting the Grenfell community through ongoing and future initiatives.

What to expect when Warringtonfire’s new $30m fire resistance testing laboratory opens

Leigh Hill, Director, Built Environment Europe at Warringtonfire discusses the new $30m Fire Resistance Testing Laboratory which opens January 2025

With construction finished and handover now complete, Warringtonfire’s flagship fire resistance testing facility is entering the penultimate testing phase.

In this Q&A, Leigh Hill, Director, Built Environment Europe, Warringtonfire, answers some questions about what people can expect from the state-of-the-art laboratory once it opens in January 2025.

Leigh, can you give us an overview of the timeline that has led up to this point?

It is exciting to be at the stage where our new large-scale Warringtonfire laboratory is less than two months away from opening.

It’s taken a long time and huge amounts of work to get to this point.

However, I’m delighted to share that our $30m fire resistance testing laboratory is all set to officially open in January 2025.

Now that construction has finished, the team will be focusing on UKAS validation and accreditation for its five furnaces and operations.

We recently passed a pivotal milestone when the first official trials of two of our large-scale furnaces were carried out.

This represents the culmination of years of planning and hard work by the team.

The testing process is expected to be completed by the end of November and will ensure that the laboratory is ready to accept test specimens when it opens its doors.

And what’s happening with Warringtonfire’s previous laboratory?

While the new Birchwood site is completed, Warringtonfire’s resistance testing team will gradually transition from the Holmesfield Road laboratory as they prepare for opening.

As part of the expansion, 50 new jobs have already been filled, including all maintenance engineer, technical officer, and technical assistant positions.

The plan is for our technical and certification teams, currently based at a third site, to move into the new facility in the first week of December.

This change brings a wealth of benefits to our clients and colleagues, who will now be physically together to support and deliver the entire end-to-end process under one roof – from initial enquiry, testing, and technical evaluation, all the way through to certification decision.

This gives us the ability to service customers to a higher standard with the latest technology and collaborative processes, whilst developing multidisciplinary teams with expertise across the whole testing and certification process.

How does the capacity at the Birchwood laboratory compare to the Holmesfield Road site?

As we all work towards better building safety, the importance of fire testing continues to grow and with that comes greater demand.

That’s why the new Birchwood Park laboratory has been designed to double the capacity of the Holmesfield Road site and triple it in due course.

We’ve had an incredible amount of interest so far in testing at the new site, with clients already securing their bookings with us.

Testing slots are filling up quickly. We’re thrilled with the positive response and are looking forward to welcoming everyone soon.

What are some of the standout features the new laboratory has to offer?

We’re thrilled that the laboratory, in partnership with Tilbury Douglas, was recognised with a Bronze Award and a perfect score of 45 out of 45 under the Considerate Constructors Scheme during its construction earlier this year.

This scheme celebrates the efforts of construction sites, organisations and suppliers who commit to raising both environmental and community social value standards.

From the initial conception of the project, we have also aspired to incorporate sustainable principles at every stage, from the energy-efficiency and air quality measures integrated into the build, to the company’s continuing commitment to sustainable operations.

Equipment such as new abatement systems which clean the smoke to ensure that fumes from the fire testing process have negligible environmental impact have aided in this.

The laboratory is also prepared to utilise a blend of clean hydrogen and natural gas as soon as the local infrastructure supports it.

While the new laboratory will be at the forefront of sustainable fire resistance testing due to these measures, client confidentiality is also a core priority in our processes.

The facility features seven confidential spray booths, each with its own temperature-controlled environment, as well as custom-made steel screens that can be attached to test preparation bays to protect intellectual property.

Dedicated client viewing areas and strict workflows are also in place to safeguard sensitive information and ensure privacy.

Ahead of the launch, we are trialling full blank screens in front of the furnaces as an additional confidentiality measure during the test process.

Have you received any early feedback from your colleagues or customers on how the new site is shaping up?

From a team perspective, colleagues have spoken about the ways this new site could speed up responses and resolutions to queries and the potential for new career pathways across the business.

We have already received extremely positive feedback from client visits so far, all of which have recognised the scale of the operation and the improved facilities for installation, welfare, and testing.

The return to a single site with the technical team nearby was also well-received.

On 14 and 15 October, UKAS attended the site to witness a timber door test on the vertical furnace.

The assessor’s feedback was positive, and they were very impressed with the laboratory and the scale of the fire resistance testing that will be completed at Birchwood Park.

Thanks Leigh, finally can you share what you’re most excited about ahead of the new facility opening?

While a lot is changing for the better, plenty also remains the same.

This includes our priority, which is to deliver a safe, healthy workplace that protects our environment.

Fire resistance testing facilities are often expected to be dim, dusty, smoky places but we’re committed to showing that this is not the case.

Instead, our facility offers a clean, state-of-the-art facility for our customers and employees.

I’m particularly looking forward to making our clients and colleagues feel at home at Birchwood Park.

Not only do we want the site to serve as a testing facility, but we also want it to become a versatile environment where meetings can be held, and our team can thrive.

Once open, the Birchwood Park laboratory will be renowned as a world-leading fire resistance testing facility and set a high benchmark for other facilities to follow.

For more about Warringtonfire and its new Birchwood Park laboratory, or to book for 2025, please visit https://www.warringtonfire.com/about-warringtonfire/warrington-site-relocation-and-expansion

If you are unsure of bookings already scheduled for 2025 or have a question regarding booking for 2025, please contact your account manager.

If you are unsure of who your account manager is, please contact Matthew Ruff (matthew.ruff@element.com) who will be able to assist.

CROSS and CHIRP issue alert on bridge strikes by large vessels

Safety alert issued on bridge strikes by large vessels: CROSS and CHIRP

CROSS and CHIRP have issued a joint Safety Alert following the March 2024 collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore.

The alert provides recommendations to mitigate the risks of large vessels striking bridges.

The alert highlights guidance for bridge designers, port authorities, and vessel operators.

It addresses how risks have evolved due to changes in maritime transport and climate.

While the probability of bridge strikes remains low, the consequences can include fatalities, infrastructure collapse, economic losses, and environmental damage.

Historical examples of bridge strikes

The alert outlines significant historical bridge strikes.

Between 1960 and 2015, there were 35 major bridge collapses globally, resulting in 342 deaths.

Examples include the Sunshine Skyway Bridge collapse in Florida in 1980 and the River Volga disaster in Russia in 1983, where 172 people lost their lives.

Recent incidents include the January 2024 damage to the Pont de Sully Bridge in Paris and the March 2024 Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse.

These incidents demonstrate the ongoing risks posed by evolving vessel sizes and environmental changes.

Bridge vulnerabilities and design considerations

Bridge vulnerabilities depend on structural design and maritime conditions.

Risks include superstructure impacts from increasing vessel sizes and substructure damage during collisions.

The alert recommends periodic risk assessments and integrating protective features such as sacrificial structures or impact-absorbing islands.

Guidance from standards like the Eurocodes and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) emphasises updating risk assessments and design approaches to align with evolving maritime challenges.

Recommendations for risk mitigation

The alert provides detailed recommendations for key stakeholders.

Bridge designers should conduct risk analyses, consider climate impacts, and implement protective measures.

Owners and operators are urged to perform regular risk reviews and liaise with port authorities.

Ship operators should ensure vessel maintenance and conduct scenario planning.

Port authorities are advised to adapt to changing vessel sizes and implement traffic management strategies to prevent collisions.

Autonomous ships and predictive technologies are highlighted as emerging tools for safety management.

CROSS and CHIRP issue alert on bridge strikes by large vessels: Summary

CROSS and CHIRP have issued a safety alert focusing on the risks of large vessels colliding with bridges, following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore in March 2024.

Historical examples highlight the severe consequences of such events, including fatalities and infrastructure damage.

The alert recommends periodic risk assessments, updated design standards, and implementing protective features to mitigate risks.

Guidance is provided for bridge designers, owners, and ship operators, with a focus on adapting to evolving maritime challenges and ensuring collaborative planning.